Body Armor But No Body Art

When LaVista police officer John Danderand goes on duty his arm goes undercover. He has to cover up a tattoo on his forearm.

That’s policy at LaVista Police. It’s to prevent the public from seeing a tattoo on an officer and getting the wrong idea.
Danderand says the public might say, “Maybe this officer is the good guy that’s here to help and protect us.”
Officer Danderand says in the past tattoos were kind of bad boy thing to do.

Bellevue Police Department is the latest area agency to require officers to cover tattoos that might be offensive or intimidating.
Chief John Stacey says, “If citizens we’re going to talk to are uncomfortable they may not be forthcoming with information.”

Stacey put the policy into affect in June. Officers already on the force are exempt but future hires will need to have tattoo covers apart of their equipment.

LaVista Chief Bob Lausten says it’s also a safety issue. A tattoo can identify an officer out of uniform.
Lausten says, “We come in contact with a lot of people who don’t always like us.” A tattoo becomes an issue on and off duty.”

Several area law enforcement agencies have a policy requiring officers cover up tattoos. In some cases military insignias are allowed but some departments say all tattoos must go undercover.


Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
powered by Disqus
WOWT NBC Omaha 3501 Farnam Street Omaha, NE 68131 (402) 346-6666 sixonline@wowt.com
Gray Television, Inc. - Copyright © 2002-2014 - Designed by Gray Digital Media - Powered by Clickability 50402842 - wowt.com/a?a=50402842