Humane Society Enforcing New Dog Ordinances
Humane Society Enforcing New Dog Ordinances Save Email Print
Educating pet owners as well as issuing citations
Posted: 3:19 PM Dec 2, 2008
Last Updated: 9:21 PM Dec 2, 2008
Reporter: Jeff Sabin
Email Address: sixonline@wowt.com

A | A | A

Most of Omaha’s new dog ordinances have been in effect since October 15th and animal control officers are busy enforcing the rules as well as educating dog owners.

“We're educating as much as citing," said Mark Langan with the Nebraska Humane Society. "We've cited in some instances when we thought a citation was appropriate, but our job is also to educate the public. We're telling the public about the new ordinances, what they have to do to satisfy the new ordinances."

So far, 24 potentially dangerous dog declarations have been issued. "We feel that by declaring those dogs potentially dangerous, putting requirements on those dogs, hopefully in the future those dogs won't pose any harm to any of the citizens of Omaha," said Langan.

Another 19 citations have been issued for dogs who have been tied up outside for longer than 15 minutes without someone 19 years or older nearby.

One of the new ordinances also requires owners of dangerous animals, potentially dangerous animals and pit bulls to carry $100,000 of liability insurance for their pet. Animal control officers have issued 13 citations for no proof of insurance.

Of the six insurance companies contacted by Channel 6 News about coverage for pit bulls and other "dangerous" breeds, only Farmer's Insurance said their basic homowner's policy included that type of coverage.

But that would change if a dog had a violent incident. The other five companies all said they did not cover those types of dog breeds.

One insurance agent said dog owners who need insurance may have to find a specialized insurance broker to provide the coverage required by the new ordinance.

One reckless owner declaration has been issued due to an owner that was not complying with his potentially dangerous dog declaration. This declaration is still in the 10-day appeal period.

Starting January 1st, pit bulls and pit bull mixes will be required to wear a muzzle when outside of a house or securely fenced yard. Exceptionally gentle pit bulls can get a muzzle exemption by passing the canine good citizen test and completing all of the other strict requirements of the Breed Ambassador Program.

Scooter Fruge’s pit bull/lab mix named Sadie was the first dog in Omaha to pass the canine good citizen test. Fruge says the test confirmed that Sadie was not dangerous.

"We basically walk towards each other with the dogs on our side and make sure the dogs don't cross and try to growl or try to play with the other dog," said Fruge.

"The only thing that I was going to have trouble with here is the sit and stay for the 20 feet. That was about it, but everything else I knew she was going to pass perfect."

Fruge said Sadie is a favorite in the neighborhood. "We had her outdoors during Halloween with all the kids trick-or-treating. She did great. All the people love her and we don't want to use that muzzle. We just don't like it."

For more information about the new dog ordinances and the Breed Ambassador Program, go to the new ordinance page at the Nebraska Humane Society Web site.

The family who helped push for tougher monitoring and punishment of dangerous dogs in Omaha will see their case return to court. The Blevins fought for those changes on behalf of their daughter Charlotte, whose scalp was ripped off by a pit bull in June.

The dog’s owner, Tina Agerson, pleaded no contest to the charges that included harboring a dangerous animal. She will be sentenced Thursday morning.

More Stories
Woman Wounded In Drive-By Shooting

Bellevue Mayor Suffers Possible Heart Attack

Police Ask For Help In Finding Hit-And-Run Suspects

Driver Gets Probation In Teen's Death

Salvation Army In Need Of Supplies

Girl Rescued From Pool Improving

Suspect In Coach's Murder Pleads Not Guilty

Motorcyclist Killed In Crash

Post Your Comments
First Name:
Location:
Enter Comments: characters left
Email (optional):
By posting this comment I have read and agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy:
You must agree to the Terms of Service to continue.
Read Comments
Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
Posted by: Faith on Dec 15, 2008 at 06:06 PM
What a joke! Imagine targeting a breed just because city officials, who have no idea about canine aggression, decide it is dangerous!! I would sure love to see some statistics on the breeds that have been biting since this archaic legislation was enforced. What is next on the agenda for Omaha - enforcing segregation laws!!

Posted by: LW on Dec 8, 2008 at 08:35 AM
Thanks Courtney! This helps tremendously.

Posted by: Courtney on Dec 5, 2008 at 10:47 AM
To all pit owners not finding insurance - If you have renters, or homeowners insurance right now, that covers $100,000 liability (which most do), YOU ARE COVERED. There is nothing in the new laws about the insurance having to be specific for the breed/dog. The NHS will take this as coverage. You are going above and beyond what the law states!

Posted by: LW on Dec 3, 2008 at 01:15 PM
I wish they would let us know which of the six insurance companies they checked with. I am hesitant to call my insurance company to raise the question with them and the fear of being dropped by my insurance company. If anyone knows please post on here.

Posted by: Steve on Dec 3, 2008 at 11:23 AM
To Jill.....Oh yes, go ahead & compare pit bulls to a terrier mix. You're just as much of an idiot as the pit bull owners who don't take responsibility for their dogs.

Posted by: B on Dec 3, 2008 at 10:37 AM
i just want to say this was suppose to be a all dog ordinance and this is just directed towards pit bulls. I have no problem following the "roles" but all dog owners need to have the same roles. I have been bit by 4 dogs and none of them have been pitbulls. I went to the nhs to purches a dog. I had to return the dog due to being very aggressive. This just tells you that other breads are aggressive too. All dogs over a current weight should have to carry insurance and need to wear a muzzle. As far as the good citizen test your dog has to be fixed and has to have a mirco chip to even qualify for the app. I do not agree with that what does the dog'S behavior have to do with a micro chip this is another way to get more $ from people. This is all but a racial profile and the roles need be be standard acrossed the board for all dog owners.

Posted by: Mary O. on Dec 3, 2008 at 10:13 AM
Personally, I feel a dog should never even be tethered. I think it's inhumane and makes a dog mean. I had a tethered dog as a child, so I'm not just guessing. Even if I didn't have a fence, I would never tether my dog. I'd take him out on a leash to do his thing and get a little exercise. If you're going to treat your dog like a piece of property, don't get a dog.

Posted by: Change of heart on Dec 3, 2008 at 10:09 AM
Scooter. My husband and I saw your story last night and I will be the first to admit my attitude about pitbulls/mix pitbulls has changed somewhat. Your dog is awsome and you are a very resposable dog owner, if everyone that owned a possable dangerous dog took the steps you did the neighborhoods would be so much safer. Thank you for sharing your story and helping me to see things in a different light. I own a very small dog and have always held my breath when out walking her if a large dog or pitbull/or mix pitbull would walk by but I can honestly say I wouldnt be at all worried if you and your sweet dog came up to say "HI" to us on a walk. Thank you again. And thank you WOWT for showing a positive story about pitbulls.

Posted by: Kelly on Dec 3, 2008 at 09:26 AM
Yes, there is. Responsible dog owners shouldn't have a problem with this or providing a kennel instead of chaining up a dog. If you can't afford the insurance and the proper housing...then you can't afford a dog or all the responsibilities that go with it.

Posted by: Breed Ambassador Vests on Dec 3, 2008 at 09:13 AM
My dog is also a Breed Ambassador...I would assume that Sadie is not wearing her vest because NHS does not have them yet. Also the vest and the redundant collar/harness are not required until Jan. 1, per NHS.

Posted by: scooter on Dec 3, 2008 at 01:31 AM
My name is Scooter, im Sadie's owner. I want to let everyone know that pitbull are a great pet to own. Everyone thinks that they are dangerous, they are not. I also have a little dog that more dangerous then my pit. I also got a phone call from the NHS after the story ended telling me thank you for going on air and telling everyone that this is a great thing to do. The guy told me that they are also getting phone calls about, why is she not on a leash. THEY ALSO TOLD ME THAT SINCE SADIE WAS NOT ON A LEASH THAT I MIGHT BE FINED FOR DOING THAT. I want to let everyone know that she is NEVER in front playing like that. I did that because I thought it would be a great shot of Sadie playing. Thank you everyone. Scooter and Sadie

Posted by: Jill on Dec 2, 2008 at 11:44 PM
NHS doesn't give a hoot about whether dogs are dangerous or not. They are still offering "terrier mixes" on their adoption site, that look decidedly pitbull. All they care about is raking in more fines from people who can't afford fences, for a ridiculous anti-tether law they pushed through while people were distracted by the pitbull mess. Shame on you, NHS. You're not helping dogs, not helping people. Maybe NHS needs some new, more intelligent leadership.

Posted by: um... on Dec 2, 2008 at 08:51 PM
Apparently there is insurance available because you have it...

Posted by: Strange? on Dec 2, 2008 at 07:38 PM
If you watch the video above this guy and his breed dog are already breaking the law. His dog Sadie which is now a breed ambassador is not wearing her vest. She's not on a leash and harness with a redundant collar..and she is not in a fenced yard. She's running into the neighbors yards as a matter of fact. While he thinks he is following the law he is breaking many laws including the LEASH LAW...which is for all dog even breed ambassadors. I suggest take a drive by his house and remind him that his dog needs to be on a leash and wearing her vest. Isn't this evidence enough to have him cited?

Posted by: the truth on Dec 2, 2008 at 04:25 PM
Now you all see how they play the game(the council and the NHS) there is NO INSURANCE AVAILABLE TO PITBULLS so the owners are forced to give up their dogs..this was just a ploy by the NHS to raise their rates and make more money..Really they didn't solve anything because people are going to remain underground with their dogs instead of registering them(if they can't get insurance) I am one of the lucky ones that was able to get insurance...

Channel 6 News Features