Omaha Pet Proposal Nearing End Of Phase One
Omaha Pet Proposal Nearing End Of Phase One Save Email Print
Committee to make recommendation to City Council
Posted: 3:11 PM Aug 11, 2008
 Last Updated: 11:06 PM Aug 11, 2008
 Email Address: sixonline@wowt.com
65 comments
A | A | A

The mayor's committee appointed to look into the matter of a new pet ordinance for Omaha met again Monday to discuss its options.

Talk of a possible pit bull ban has created quite a stir following the attack on a 15-month-old girl in June. The city says it's time to do something to protect the public.

The committee is working on a proposal, whether that be to ban certain breeds of dogs or harsher punishments for owners if they harbor a dangerous animal or fail to keep their pet on a leash.

"He'll lick ‘em to death,” says June Smith. Shadow is part lab, part cocker spaniel, but now he's all hero.

"As we were walking back the next thing I know I've got this pit bull coming right at me and Shadow jumped in front and got the brunt of it," says Smith, who says she was walking her dog Sunday evening at South 8th Street and 2nd Avenue in Council Bluffs when what she thought was a pit bull came charging.

"I started screaming and it was like I was screaming forever. I kept hollering, help somebody, help."

Council Bluffs Animal Control says the dog that attacked was not a pit bull, but an American bulldog, still part of the so-called “bully breeds."

"I thought he was gonna kill Shadow,” says Smith. “He was going for his neck and just was on top of him and I thought I was never gonna see my dog again."

In Council Bluffs, a pit bull ban has been in effect since 2005 so this brings up the question, if Omaha creates a similar ban will we really stop dog attacks from happening?

"We want to do everything we can to increase public safety across the city as it relates to any dog bite incident,” says Don Thorson, Omaha Mayor Mike Fahey’s deputy chief of staff.

A committee made up of Omaha City Council and Humane Society representatives, along with police and the mayor's office, is working to create an ordinance. "We’re working on it,” says Omaha City Councilman Garry Gernandt. “There'll be something soon."

"I think the emphasis has really been public safety and how do we protect the citizens of Omaha in a rational, reasonable method and I think the package that we're going to present is extremely comprehensive," notes Nebraska Humane Society president Judy Varner.

The committee has looked at other cities' bans and hopes to create what will be best for Omaha. "I think this is going to be one of the most comprehensive in the country," says Varner.

The committee has not said if the ordinance will ban a specific breed or includes all so-called dangerous dogs. It hopes to have a proposal for the City Council by August 26th.

“They're going to review it, what we come up with and they're going to hash it out,” says Thorson. “There will be a public hearing and at the end of the day we're going to have a good ordinance."

Smith hopes that in time it will prevent other tragedies from happening. "What if that had been a child that was walking to school or home from school or whatever, there's already been enough attacks around here."

Council Bluffs' ban keeps any new pit bulls from coming into the city. Owners who had their pets before 2005 have been able to keep them, but they must re-license them every year.

Council Bluffs has not had any pit bull bites so far this year and total dog bites are also down.
More Stories
Fireworks Show Threatened By Rain

Holiday Weekend Fireworks Displays

Fireworks Injury Victim Warns Others

Woman Stabbed Multiple Times

 Update: Owner of Pit Bulls Cited

Barking Upsets Neighbors

Historian Follows In Ancestor's Footsteps

Palin Resigns As Alaska Governor
Post Your Comments
First Name:
Location:
Enter Comments: characters left
Email (optional):
By posting this comment I have read and agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy:
You must agree to the Terms of Service to continue.
Read Comments
Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
Posted by: ana on Sep 19, 2008 at 09:40 AM
i don't think its fair to continue stereotyping pitbulls as visious dogs.i own two myself and they are both very loving dogs. they can be very protective however they would never attack anyone without reason. its all about the way the dogs are trianed, any dog can be visious. its not fair to put all of the blaim on pitts.
Posted by: FarmBoy to Patrick on Aug 15, 2008 at 11:52 AM
Patick - where in my post did I say I did not care about city folks. I am one! I just don't need Mommy / Daddy and the Government in MY business - nor you for that matter. No baiting, - WHERE DOES IT END ?
Posted by: b on Aug 15, 2008 at 10:54 AM
Between guns and pits the streets are looking kind of scary.
Posted by: Anonymous on Aug 15, 2008 at 10:25 AM
To Al in Bellvue Do you know that for the ratio of dogs, German Shepards bite as much as pit bulls. In 2006 they were the #1 biting dog in Omaha. Do you also know that when Bans start they just keep going. Guess which breed will be next?
Posted by: Anonymous on Aug 15, 2008 at 07:14 AM
I have owned many types of dogs in my life. Including 2 pit bull mixes. I've always tried to do the right things with my dogs walking, training, etc. I've always loved all my dogs but I have to say my pit bull mixes were the only dogs I've ever had a problem with. They were mean and unpredictible. It's not a good feeling when the puppy you tried to rescue grows into a monster that wants to tear apart everything that moves inspite of the best intentions. I've never had a problem with training or socializing any of my other dogs and I've had plenty so I'm inclined to think it's the pit bull factor. I think it's cruel to breed an animal not suited for any domestic purpose, unless your consider watching animals tear each other apart sport.
Posted by: Patrick on Aug 15, 2008 at 12:34 AM
Farmboy, you ask if we start, where is the stopping point? There's a more important question: what if we don't start. Pit bulls are only 3-4% of the dog population, yet they are guilty of HALF the dog attacks that require a hospital visit, and they slaughter a THIRD of the people killed by dogs annually. When the pit bull population grows, and pit bulls account for 75% of the hospital visits and 60% of the deaths, will you be willing to take action then? How about when the statistics are 90% and 80%? Still no action? I guess you don't care about city people, because you're a farm boy, so quit faking your compassion for pit bulls and keep your baiting comments out of this discussion.
Posted by: Anonymous on Aug 14, 2008 at 08:29 PM
I think that some peoples agruments about pitbulls are not true. I have two pitbulls. They are wonderful dogs. You have to( like every dog should) train them. I knew what I was getting into when I got them. It is all about how you raise them. You socialize them with babies, children, and even the elderly people. I take them to the park every day so they can run around with other dogs. They socialize. They love people, and are not mean. And I am sick and tired of what people say. Any dog can be mean. It is the owner that has to teach them. They are responsible.
Posted by: Chris on Aug 14, 2008 at 06:37 PM
That's it, Kam! Manditory dog training for all citizens, dog owners or not. Let's teach everyone how not to be afraid of an attacking dog. Maybe we should also teach people to sit up, roll over, and beg.
Posted by: Ban ALL on Aug 14, 2008 at 05:38 PM
I'm still waiting for you pit supporters to throw out some ideas on how to solve this problem.....
Posted by: Al on Aug 14, 2008 at 04:36 PM
By the way. I have owned Dobermans in the past. I currently have an awesome pair of German Shepards which I very carefully researched bloodlines for In-Breeding and hip issues prior to purchase. My male is overe 100lbs and my female is extremely family oriented. Neither one of these dogs would ever harm a person that wasn't posing a DEFINATE threat to my wife or child. And then I'm not so sure that they would attack. It would be more like taking control of the situation. I know several people who own Pit Bulls. And I have been around their dogs for extensive amounts of time. There is absolutely NO comparison between the two breeds in family environments. The German Shepard is family oriented as well as affectionate and loyal to their family. And there is this very uncomfortable feeling of being "prey" when around the Pit Bulls. Not just one of them. In each one of the 7 homes I often visit where these Pit Bulls are living. Does that tell anybody something??
Posted by: FarmBoy Again on Aug 14, 2008 at 12:02 PM
If you start, where is the stopping point? My God, when did we become so weak as a society that we need governmental control over every aspect of (what is becoming) our total society's sorry excuse for a life.
Posted by: anonymous on Aug 14, 2008 at 11:32 AM
I am a proud owner of 2 dogs that are in a fenced in yard and kenneled and have another dog in my home. The 2 that are in the yard and kenneled are Pit bulls and the 1 in the house is an American Bulldog, and all dogs are unpredictable not just Pitts. My dogs have never bitten anyone, so why should I and people like me who take good care of there dogs be put at risk to lose these dogs which are part of our families? Should my dog attck someone then I would feel responsibe for that attack and willing to accept any consequences for my dogs actions, be that of fines and paying for the medical care that is needed, just as if my child did something wrong, and those of us who really love our pets are willing to do that, so why ban them all of them are not bad. Maybe they should enforce the laws they already have first.
Posted by: Kam on Aug 14, 2008 at 11:06 AM
Ok, the dog that attacked the C.B. woman's dog was NOT a Pitbull. I have an American Bulldog which is what it was. I really think they should have classes for people to be trained. Bulldogs have sensitive ears and are scared easily. I'm sorry but if you are scared they sense it and makes them scared. Screaming is a way to stop a dog attack but you need to do it in an authoritive tone not fear. I don't agree with a breed specific ban, i do agree with stronger punishments for owners and some sort of regulations on all dogs even little wimpy chihuahas. Which by the way are skittish dogs that tend to bite. The difference is anyone can throw a chihuaha off so noone thinks its a big deal. By the way, any dog bites that pierce the skin need stitches and medical attention. My daughter was bit by a Scottie and had to have stitches and antiobotics.I think too many people are afraid of dogs and have no respect. Maybe a defense training class is needed.
Posted by: To Pit Bull Owner on Aug 14, 2008 at 07:25 AM
Law enforcement chose German Shepherds over Pit Bulls, because German Shepherds don't tear their victims to shreds, like Pit Bulls would, before the officers get to them. You're funny. You told Anonymous to do a little research and sound somewhat educated, but you can't get your facts straight. You're just another fool blindly echoing what you've been told to say by the Pit Bull defense counsel. (That’s a polite way to say you might not be intentionally lying, if you’re merely gullible.)
Posted by: John on Aug 14, 2008 at 06:56 AM
Pit bull, owner as long as you're educating the rest of us answer this please. If other dogs such as the German Shepherd have more biting power than pit bulls than why is it that only the pit bull can support it's own weight for an extended period of time hanging only by the power of it's jaws? Real life is the best labratory. The revisionist history, or better put fictional pro-pit bull web-sites just don't reflect the real nature and danger of the pit bull breed. The rest of us should not have to wait for the learning curve of the pit bull owners to catch up before we are safe from the next pit bull attack.
Posted by: Me on Aug 14, 2008 at 03:31 AM
If insurance companies can have a list of dogs it deems dangerous and keep you from getting insurance on your house, then there should be a list of dangerous dogs for pet owners. If you have one of those dogs and it maims or kills someone, you have committed a felony, not a misdemeanor. I know pit bull puppies are cute little furballs and that they're fine up until one day, they just snap and do something you wouldn't expect. So a list of those potentially dangerous dogs would be a good start. I also feel that pet stores and the humane society should also put the "cons" of what the breed can do as well beside just the "pros" of the pet.
Posted by: Back to Pit Bull Owner from Anonymous on Aug 13, 2008 at 11:23 PM
Why do I sound irresponsible just because I choose to dislike a certain breed? I choose not to think a dog that regularly KILLS people and their pets MUST remain in our society. Sounds like it is you who is irresponsible to defend such an out of control breed. Get your facts strait before calling me such. My Shepherds are licensed, vaccinated, they dont run free, and they are very well obedience trained. So what is irresponsible about that? I think is you who needs to get your facts strait before you accuse me of being irresponsible just because I have an opinion.
Posted by: Back to Pit Bull Owner from Anonymous on Aug 13, 2008 at 11:17 PM
Do some searching of your own. Pit Bulls were bred to attack and take down an animal hundreds of pounds higher than itself. They were bred to do as much damage as can be done. They were bred to fight and KILL other animals. Shepherds were bred for loyalty and protection. They bite and hold, they don't bite and tear things to shreds, Unlike your pit bull friends. You can try pushing your opinion until you are blue in the face. But do some more research. Post the number of PIT BULL RELATED DEATHS as opposed to SHEPHERD related deaths. You might surprise yourself.
Posted by: me on Aug 13, 2008 at 09:07 PM
texas dept of human services has stats, 40 % of attacks were pit, chow or rots , with pits being half of those.... coincidently around 45% of dog bite victims required hospitalization/ surgery. Hmmm. you want stats... no problem. non-fixed male pits were the worst. considering that pits are relatively rare compared to labs etc., and they are responsible for the highest number of attacks- seems like you pit owners need to wake up and smell the stats
Posted by: ThE cLoWn PrINcE on Aug 13, 2008 at 08:37 PM
stats- of the 150 breeds- two account for the majority of deadly attacks. The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) published a study concerning deaths from canine attacks in 2000. According to the study, between 1979 and 1998, one-third of all fatal dog attacks were caused by Pit Bull type dogs. The highest number of attacks (118) were by Pit Bull type dogs, the next highest being Rottweilers at 67. You can't have it both way pit owners, the hurricane kennel, where you may have gotten your demon dog, whose website is now down, advertised them as a vicious dog.
Posted by: Jeff on Aug 13, 2008 at 04:17 PM
Catie, you said guns aren't banned. Are you really that ignorant? We have a gun ban. Okay, not all guns are banned, just like it would be stupid to ban all dogs. We allow citizens to have certain guns when properly licensed, but we have banned fully automatic weapons, because OUR LAWMAKERS DECIDED THEIR EXTREME DANGER OVERRIDES THE RIGHT OF OWNERSHIP. Similarly, we need to ban pit bulls, because their extreme danger overrides the right of ownership. Sure, all dogs bite, just as all guns shoot, but some dogs are much more dangerous than others. Specifically, PIT BULLS = FULLY AUTOMATIC WEAPONS.
Posted by: Tones on Aug 13, 2008 at 12:02 PM
A pit bull ban would work in Omaha, no other dog breed shreds children like pit bulls. If the irresponsible owners go for other breeds, there may be an increase in bites by other breeds, but it will not be the bloodbath like attack frenzies that only a pit bull can produce. BAN PIT BULLS NOW!!
Posted by: FarmBoy on Aug 13, 2008 at 11:26 AM
I am not sure if I would be called a "Pit Supporter", however, if a breed specific ban comes out of this, where does it end? German Shepherds and Labs next? More gun control after that. Well, "prying a leash or other items out of my cold dead hands" comes to mind. If you don't like the pits in the city, move to the country. You can control a much larger area of YOUR choosing and therefore provides you the "safety" a total breed specific ban would bring. My God, when did we become so weak as a society that we need governmental control over every aspect of (what is becoming) our total society's sorry excuse for a life.
Posted by: Ban ALL of them. on Aug 13, 2008 at 09:53 AM
A question NONE of you pit supporters have yet answered. Since all of you say its the owners -- which is FALSE -- bad breeding practices and interbreeding have in many cases created a bad animal. What exactly do you think needs to be done? How do you regulate or place punishments on a general society that already does not take care of their pets already? How do you make these owners be responsible? Give some ideas......
Posted by: mikey on Aug 13, 2008 at 08:53 AM
Did anyone notice that the woman's dog is totally out of control in this video? Who's walking Who? Looks to me that her dog dragged her along for the ride and probably wass to blame for getting her near the pit in the first place. Mark my words, there will be NO pit bull ban in Omaha and the uneducated comments on here are a prime example as to why. Those who want a ban have NO statistics, no scientific proof and offer no evidence that a ban would protect residents for dog bites. Those who are against a ban beat their heads against the wall to educate the public with facts and evidence and will prevail against ignorance and fear mongering.
Posted by: ShepherdOwner on Aug 13, 2008 at 07:19 AM
Pit bull owner, yeah a pit bull ban would make me fell better. What'smore if the women who owned the pit bull that attacked those kids owned a German Shepherd, and walked it regularly, I don't think any of us would have anything to worry about. You aren't taking into account that Shepherds are herding dogs and the ablity to socialize is bred into them. Just like tearing living things into little pieces is bred into pit bulls. The only time shepherds hurt anyone is when they aren't trained and socialized properly. Look at how frequently pit bull owners act suprized that their dogs hurt anyone in spite of the best intentions by the owner. Only those who are willing to train and socialize their dogs should owner German Shepaherds. Maybe they should have a special license. Noone should own a pit bull as they are bred for no practical purpose. And let's be realistic. Alot of dog behavior is inherent. Anyone who says otherwise is lying or doesn't know what they are talking about.
Posted by: To Anonymous From Pit Bull Owner on Aug 13, 2008 at 07:16 AM
Again, do a little research and sound somewhat educated!!! Do you think it was just because german shepherds were what was on hand that they used them in concentration camps and they are used by law enforcement today. FYI-a german shepherd (238 psi)has more bite force than a pit bull (235 psi). I am not saying german shepherds are bad dogs, but in the hands of a bad owner they are...just like a pit bull or any other dog for that matter. Get your facts straight before you make decisions...you sound as irresponsible as the owners you compain about!
Posted by: Do something! on Aug 13, 2008 at 03:12 AM
I for one don't think a complete ban of pit bulls is the ultimate answer. There will always be people out there (just like drivers without licenses/insurance) that don't obey the laws. But something is better than nothing right now. Has it not worked in Council Bluffs? I say if you are caught with a pit bull after a ban is implemented, you face very serious fines and/or jail time. That would at least give those that plan on keeping these animals something to think about when caught. I just don't think you can be sure an owner has the right restaints, shots or even the insurance needed to pay for a potential attack. I just do not trust these animals. Never will. They seem to be more unpredictable than other breeds, and definately inflict more damage when they attack. People can argue where all dogs rank when it comes to biting all you want. But you cannot argue the visciousness of pit bull when he latches on and shakes his victim like a shark.
Posted by: GoHskrs on Aug 12, 2008 at 11:01 PM
Well you can make stiffer fines all you want, Omaha. The only people who continuously allow their animals to run loose won't be concerned in the least, and our 'wonderful' Judges will continue to assign ridiculously low fines. My dog was killed by a loose pit last year while we were out for our walk. We went to court, and the owner got a 50 DOLLAR FINE. Meanwhile my dog DIED. Yet someone in court right before our case got busted for getting caught with a crack pipe in his car, and he got a 200 dollar fine.... Sorry, but to me, a dog that runs around and KILLS, should be a bigger violation than a crack pipe lying on the floor of your car... So they can make the fines as big as earth for all I care. The judges will just drop them, the owners will continue to break the law, and our children and pets will continue to get attacked. And everyone complaining "its not the dog, it's the owner." You are so correct, but there is no way to push and shove these owners into being responsible people.
Posted by: Anonymous on Aug 12, 2008 at 10:49 PM
To ''Pit Bull Owner-'' If people move on to other breeds thats fine... Other breeds will always bite, but they dont rip things to shreds like pit bulls do. She was smart in getting something other than a pit. She realizes she cannot control such an unpredictable breed of dog.
Posted by: Catie on Aug 12, 2008 at 09:28 PM
I also wanted to add after reading through a few of your posts, I am disapointed in the lack of education people have or they think they know it all. I'm sure most of you didn't hear that a 2 month old BABY was KILLED by a black lab puppy in Oklahoma a couple weeks ago, look for it on cnn. And about 3 weeks ago a choc. lab who had shown aggression before tour into a 9 year old face and pretty much ripped his lips off near Junita NE, he had 170 some stiches to his face.....you get the point. ANY DOG CAN AND WILL BITE, NEVER THINK IT WON'T, NO MATTER WHAT AGE OR BREED!
Posted by: Catie on Aug 12, 2008 at 09:10 PM
A ban will absolutly not solve the problem! You will find that people will hide their dogs and because of that they won't get the proper health care they need and then you run into other issues. The city needs to think about all the time and effort a ban will take, as well as extra tax payer money.......I am all for stern rules if thats what it takes to keep a ban from happening. This is a free country and people have the right to own what ever breed they choose, and yes people have the right to be safe in their city, but guns kill alot more than dogs do, and they aren't banned.....doesn't make much sense to me!! You need a permit to have a gun, why not come up with a permit to own certain breeds and regulate that if it is such an issue.......it may help eliminate all the irresponsible owners out there who have no buiness owning a "bully breed" because they just spoil it for everyone who has great dogs and are great responsible owners. I am a proud pit bull owners and will always be!!
Posted by: me on Aug 12, 2008 at 08:54 PM
it's not the dogs, was the owner the one that had a chunk of 1 year old scalp in her mouth. idiot owners. all animal owners have to remember the pet is never 100% under control no matter how well trained, and pitbulls are much more dangerous that 1% (and that's generous) that they are out of control.
Posted by: Suzi on Aug 12, 2008 at 03:57 PM
This is just awful - it's not the dogs, it's the owners!!!! When will someone truly realize that?
Posted by: to pit Bull Owners on Aug 12, 2008 at 03:56 PM
Your right to own a dangerous animal doesnt supercede our right to safety.
Posted by: me on Aug 12, 2008 at 03:46 PM
another thing you pit owners don't get is everytime there is an attack, we get to hear about what a great lovable dog it is, and how surprised the owner is that the beast attacked. I've heard it too many times
Posted by: tHe ClOwn PRinCe on Aug 12, 2008 at 03:29 PM
you pitbull owners are a riot-is it that hard to admit a breed that was created for fighting is dangerous. responsible pitbull owner defined- someone that understands the dog is capable of crushing bones and realizes that the way the dog behaves around him or her is not necessarily the way it will behave around other people. I've been around a lot of different types of dogs, the craziest are pitbulls, wolf-hybrids and chows, a rottweiller-you can at least tell when they are not friendly, they display their intentions.
Posted by: Rod on Aug 12, 2008 at 03:27 PM
How many of you that are in favor of a ban are doing your part as citizens? I continue to see stories of "these dogs that run loose in the neighborhood". How many of you call that in when you see it? Some, but not many I bet! I'm sure you have your reasons for not getting involved at that point. It's easier to complain later after problems arise with that very dog.
Posted by: Pit Bull Owner on Aug 12, 2008 at 11:34 AM
A pit bull ban will make you feel better? What if I told you that the woman who owned the pit bull that attacked those children now owns a german shephard? Does that ban you are all begging for make you feel safe now? She does you know...she has moved on with another breed, like all of the other irresponsible owners will. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. Sad that so many of you decided to make yours with false information. If you REALLY are so concerned...do a little research first and at least sound somewhat educated on the issue!
Posted by: B on Aug 12, 2008 at 10:51 AM
Lets get to root of the problem and ban the people that actually want to own these dogs.
Posted by: Me on Aug 12, 2008 at 10:34 AM
To Mel in Omaha- Just last week in Florida a lab/retriever attacked and nearly mauled an infant.Any dog can attack and kill. Size is a factor-but the main contributing factor is how a dog is raised by the owners. Rottweilers in ancient time were bred to attack and lead armies.I owned a Rott for 11 years.She was the most gentilest dog I have ever had.I do not own a Pitt nor plan to-but ANY dog can attack and kill if it is raised in a negetive enviornment.If a ban on all bully breeds passes,then everyone that ownes a bull dog or boxer is also included. Their are a lot of dogs out there with Bully characteristics-do we ban all those too-Akitas,shepards,dobbies,rotties-Wow,there are a lot of people in Omaha who will either pack up-or fight this. Make stiffer licencing requirements for Pitt owners. Have these owners put fences around their yards with warning signs.
Posted by: concerned citizen on Aug 12, 2008 at 10:29 AM
(cont) "Dogs don't have a thing to do with their own behavior -- people do," advisory board member Doug Jensen said. Jensen is a Doberman pinscher breeder and expressed concern that a ban on any one particular breed would lead to a ban on more and more. Bans are simply not appropriate, Jensen said, because they are an infringement on people's civil rights. Breed bans are also virtually unenforceable, he said. Jensen, who judges internationally for the American Kennel Club, said the pit bull is actually a crossbreed known as the Staffordshire bull terrier. Determining the lineage and breed of a dog can be a challenge and would make enforcement of any breed ban difficult, he said. "There are so many crossbreeds. How do you determine what is and what isn't?" Shotkoski asked. Grand Island Police Chief Steve Lamken said, based on calls for service from his officers, pit bulls aren't the problem. The owners are.
Posted by: concerned citizen on Aug 12, 2008 at 10:26 AM
Funny how Grand Island gets it, but not the citizens of Omaha.... Animal Advisory Board: No dog breed ban in Grand Island GRAND ISLAND - While the Nebraska cities of Osceola and Minden have added dog breed bans to their city laws this summer, Grand Island will not pursue such a ban. The Animal Advisory Board met on Monday and was adamant that a ban on any dog breed not become a part of the Grand Island city code. City Attorney Dale Shotkoski had asked the board if it wanted to pursue a ban after his office received calls recently about pit bulls. "Any type of dog can do severe damage," said Laurie Dethloff, Central Nebraska Humane Society executive director. "We prefer to make the owners accountable, not the breed." Dethloff and Humane Society Shelter Manager Jane Kuehn said that accountability comes through things such as property insurance, leash laws, kennels and muzzles for dogs that have a demonstrated history of biting.
Posted by: Scott on Aug 12, 2008 at 10:15 AM
Ban ALL pit bulls!!!
Posted by: B on Aug 12, 2008 at 10:13 AM
Thank you Keith. I thought Jennifer from CB's comments were idiotic also.
Posted by: Anonymous on Aug 12, 2008 at 09:19 AM
IT IS JUST STUPID IRRESPONSIBLE OWNERS. GET A GRIP OMAHA, WE HAVE A LOT OF STUPIDS HERE. MY DOGS DONT HAVE THE CHANCE TO BE LET OUT and HAVE NEVER BIT!!!! WHY PUNISH RESPONSIBLE PEOPLE AND THERE GOOD DOGS. WHEN WE CAN PUNISH OWNERS WHO GET THE DOG FOR NO REASON BUT TO NOT CARE ABOUT THEM. MY PITS ARE MY BABIES LITERALLY! NEVER DO THEY GO OUTSIDE. PUT A BAN EAST OF 72ND STREET!
Posted by: Michal on Aug 12, 2008 at 09:17 AM
I hope this ordinance will include ALL of Douglas County. Not just Omaha. I live in a subdivision in NW O, but not a part of the city. I have a neighbor right next door to me that has a Pit. He lets his dog run free around his driveway and front yard quite often. It only takes a split second for a dog to attack. But the owner thinks his dog would not harm anything. MORON! THERE is a leash law for a reason. It is irresponsible owners like him that make the breed look bad. Take some pet/owner responsibility and follow the proper laws and rules, and nobody would call the law and/or Humane Society on your dog.
Posted by: llr on Aug 12, 2008 at 09:08 AM
Why can't we make it a law that all dogs out for a walk or free in its backyard must wear a sturdy harness and definitely a MUZZLE? At least the muzzle part. And any dog not licensed and vaccinated properly will be removed from its owner and if dangerous, euthanized. That way, it's a small price to pay for people who are legal, and the idiots who own the ill-bred monsters will promptly lose them to the Humane Society. No breed is therefore BANNED. After all, if you can't afford to license, spay/neuter and vaccinate your pet properly, you really have no business owning one. There's responsibility that comes from owning a pet, and if you're irresponsible, then guess what...the city will just take away your pet. Just like the state takes away irresponsible parents' children.
Posted by: John on Aug 12, 2008 at 06:39 AM
Recent dog attacks in Omaha have proven a point about dog breeds. In last months case where a little boy was scratched on the nose by a lab. It was a clear case of a negligent owner but the little boy received a mere scratch. Now look at the victims of recent pit bull attacks in Omaha. Each of these pit bull victims will carry the scars and feel the pain for the rest of their lives. Would any of us be the one to tell these unfortunate people that they must live in fear of another pit bull attack every time they step out the door or they must leave Omaha. It's the dog and the owner, and pit bulls are bred to kill for those who feel the need to own an animal capable of killing with ease and efficiency.
Posted by: Mike on Aug 12, 2008 at 04:33 AM
Keith, FYI, I have been in veterinary medicine for 30 years and have permanent nerve damage in my left index finger due to a chihuahua bite. Folks, you need to be careful about blanket statements concerning anything. Just reading this thread enlightens me on the amount of ignorance out there.
Posted by: LS on Aug 12, 2008 at 12:05 AM
Most pit bulls kill...everyone knows it orthey r lying or in denial. Complete ban on pit bulls will save lives. A dangerous animal...according to who? Oh he's such a good dog it's just how u raise them...BS
Posted by: Mel on Aug 11, 2008 at 08:58 PM
Oh good grief, "Jennifer" "...they may be animals but they have feelings too..."? Gimme a break - are these "sweet" little pups reading the news, then? Do you really think they "feel discriminated against"? Well, if that is the case, then wolves, pumas, crocodiles, & grizzly bears must all be emotionally devastated that Omaha doesn't allow citizens to keep THEM as pets. I mean, we don't want these dangerous animals to need therapy or antidepressants... we shouldn't "discriminate" against them, just because they have the ability and the inclination to rip a person's throat out (the smaller & more defenseless the person, the more likely the attack) As for the moron suggesting we ban wiener dogs: when is the last time you heard of a dachshund mauling a person to death? The pit that attacked the 15 month old was on a leash, had shots, was licensed, & still overpowered its owner & two adults in its drive to try to kill that baby. Ban these animals.
Posted by: Gary on Aug 11, 2008 at 08:49 PM
Jennifer, I agree lets ban all dogs in Omaha. Shitzus, poodles, beagles, labs, every stinking one. then we will all be safe. People and their dogs make me sick. They aren't human they are animals. Grow up. PS can you clean up all the poop once and awhie...
Posted by: Keep them legal... on Aug 11, 2008 at 08:44 PM
as long as the owners have & can prove, that they have HUGE insurance on their homeowner/renters insurance...because when & if their dog bites someone they will (and rightfully so) be financially destroyed...
Posted by: AB Show Judge on Aug 11, 2008 at 08:29 PM
I am a Show judge for 3 diffrent American Bulldog Registries along with being a trainer of the breed. I want to say that yes something needs to be done about irresponsible owners of a bull breed but you cant base foul opinions about the breed due to owners lack of responsiblity. The A.B. Breed is a loyal and friendly breed in general but when crossed out to other bully breeds this could cause issues for those who obviously can not control thier dogs. I feel more people should research the breed before they get it! If you do not understand what your getting into, dont get into it! Those of us that work with dogs and have knowledge should educate the public and maybe offer free services to educate those who may not be able to afford training classes. That in itself would better our community. Thats what a community is about anyway. Its just sad that its had to come down to a community living in fear of mans best friend..Lab,Pit-bull, German sheaperd, or a common lap dog... Its just sad.
Posted by: Keith on Aug 11, 2008 at 08:26 PM
"Oh, pitt bulls are the nicest sweetest animal I can't understand what the problem is..." When was the last time you heard of a weiner dog or a chihuahua rip the scap off of a child? And don't compare humans to animals, ok? We don't descriminate against people hurting people, we punish the crime! Probably screams racial descrimination when a horse is shot at a race track too. "oh, but those pretty horses are so sweet and cuddly...you can't shoot them! So what if his leg is broken! That horse never hurt you.." Why do we think of pitt bull when a dog charges?? Because that is the breed that is making the news that causing all the problems! How dare anyone bring a pitt bull to the same level as a human being!
Posted by: travis on Aug 11, 2008 at 07:07 PM
I am a owner of an american bulldog. I walk my dog daily and she greets many people and childer daily. She is always restrained properly. When I walk my dog I run into many dogs off of a leash. This is the reason My dog is at risk because like the dogs that have been involved in the attacks its the owners that are at fault. But If my dog is attacked while on her leash I'm sure she would be to blame before the violating dog. I have contacted police and humaine society over these dogs off their leash and I still have this present danger around me daily. This is criminal neglegence for proposing a ban or restrictions when the city its self does nothing to protect the public from loose animals. I dont break the leash law and should not be punished due to the city's neglect of the laws they are required to enforce.
Posted by: Ryan on Aug 11, 2008 at 06:32 PM
Finally, the government is working to control the people. I was worried that there was still some freedom to be found in Omaha. Chairman Mao would be proud.
Posted by: I Love Pitts on Aug 11, 2008 at 06:06 PM
OK, the Anonymous..I guess you have'nt read the history of Pittbulls either. So I will give you a little insight. Pitts come from Stratfordshire Terriers, this breed was bread to be Nanny's for children. This is because of the way they would protect them and watch over them. I have been raised with pittbulls and love them to death. I have a mixed breed right now and if it was'nt for her my niece could have been seriously hurt by a Chow Chow. My pitt protected her to the fullest. She did not kill the other dog but wounded it enough to make it run away. And if I can remember Chow's were facing the same ban years ago. So my dog did it's job, protecting my family. But I would expect that from any breed.
Posted by: Courtney on Aug 11, 2008 at 04:59 PM
Anonymous, just FYI, pit bulls were bred to protect farmers from BULLS (hence the part of the name). Even if they were bred as guard dogs, they are not the only breed to be bred for protection. Why not ban all 'guard dogs'? Dobies, sheperds, even weimaraners. Why not? Because that would be crazy to ban any breed of dog for a few individual's actions.
Posted by: Chris on Aug 11, 2008 at 04:39 PM
to Anonymous, maybe you need a little reading, just a month or so ago I was reading about back in the 70's Omaha was planning to ban Doberman Pinchers because they were used by Drug Lords to protect from other drugies and Cops. Did you also know that a beagle ripped off a 2 year olds privates that had to be sewed back on. And 2 months later another Beagle ripped a child's nose off. Should we ban those cute little beagles. And those Taco Bell dogs are known to be aggressive but are just 2 small 2 do to much damege, should we get rid of those rat looking things. I think people who breed dogs 2 fight should be locked up and be held accountable. If you treat a kid like a bad kid he will probably grow up to treat his kids bad. Same 4 dogs you beat them they will be vicious.
Posted by: Anonymous on Aug 11, 2008 at 04:06 PM
About time!!! Pitt bulls were bread to be mean for generations. They were bred to protect and attack as guard dogs. Anyone who tells you another story better look into the history of the breed. BAN THAM! No more children need to have their scalps bitten off!
Posted by: Kelly on Aug 11, 2008 at 03:54 PM
It is unfair to ban a specific breed of dog. Pit Bulls are no more likely to attack than any other animal. I own a pit bull mix that is the most gentle, and good-natured dog (regardless of breed) that you will ever meet. Do not punish good people and good dogs because of the actions of a few. Instead, focus on punishing those who abuse these animals. You cannot blame an animal for their behavior. You can blame irresponsible owners for abusing a dog to the point of it behaving like a monster.
Posted by: Jennifer on Aug 11, 2008 at 03:53 PM
It's funny that a dog comes charging and immeadiately "pitt bull" coems to mind. I Love Pitts and they have all been great dogs, even to my children and other children in the neighborhood till the ban and wasn't able to afford the insurance for them. the reason they were great dogs is because they were in a loving home, never harshly scolded. You will not stop dog attacks, it is in a dogs nature to do so, even mine though was never acted on. How many little yappy dogs bite peoples ankles? It may not be as severe as a pitt or shepheard, because of the size difference, but proportion it out, i bet it would be the same if they were a larger breed. I think it's wrong. If you are goign to ban one breed, then ban them all, even poodles and weinner dogs, then it would be fair. They may be animals but have feelings too, you are doing the same thing as racial discrimination. Someone attacks another person, than we should ban the race right? You know that wouldn't happen, so don't 4 Dog
Posted by: Anonymous on Aug 11, 2008 at 03:24 PM
Ban them. Council man Gernandt thinks the solution it to regulate the person holding the leash, not the animal at the end of it. Problem.. many of these pit bulls are not on a lease in the first place, and their owners do not license them.
Channel 6 News Features



Political Headlines