Pit Bull Debate Renewed
Pit Bull Debate Renewed Save Email Print
Talk of ban resurfaces
Posted: 6:07 PM Jun 26, 2008
Last Updated: 7:28 PM Jun 26, 2008

A | A | A

Wednesday's dog attacks in Omaha have renewed the ongoing debate over the possibility of banning pit bulls. It brings out strong emotions on both sides of the argument.

Many cities across the country ban the breed including Denver and most of Kansas City. Closer to home, Council Bluffs adopted a ban in 2005.

Neighbors around 14th and Pine, near the spot where Wednesday's attacks occurred, say they would like to see a ban in Omaha.

The year before the ban in the Bluffs, there were 29 reported pit bull bites in the city. Last year there were two and so far in 2008 there have been no pit bull bites reported in the Bluffs.

Only pit bulls that were already in the city prior to the 2005 ban are now allowed in the city and those are under heavy restriction.

Assistant City Attorney Don Bauermeister says, "There's been less attacks. The numbers have gone down. We don't have as many pit bulls in Council Bluffs as we did in 2003, 2004."

In Omaha, City Councilman Jim Vokal says, "Certainly, something needs to be done. We have to protect the health and safety of Omaha."

While Vokal says we can't let this attack cause a quick reaction without merit, he says we do need to change.

He says, "We can't sit back and do nothing and that's historically what we've done. Not we as a council but we as a community, including the Humane Society."

The Humane Society's Pam Weise says, "We haven't been a big proponent of a pit bull ban because there's no evidence that the ban accomplishes what the city is trying to do."

But Weise adds that the Nebraska Humane Society will meet with city leaders and work with them on whatever they decide to do.

Weise says that the pit bull is now number-one when it comes to dog bites in Omaha. She says it passed German Shepherds a few years ago.

So far this year there have been 210 total dog bites reported in Omaha. Of those, 48 involved pit bulls. Last year there were 524 bites and 88 of those involved pit bulls. In both of those years, the Humane Society says Labs were the number-two biters.

More Stories
Family Mourns Omaha's Latest Murder Victim

Hit-And-Run Crash Kills Man

Midtown Sparkles Sunday Night

Gun Violation Found On MySpace

Conference Examines Impact Of Disasters

Park East Store Burglarized

Protection Order Violations

Iowa Man Shot To Death In Chicago

Post Your Comments
First Name:
Location:
Enter Comments: characters left
Email (optional):
By posting this comment I have read and agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy:
You must agree to the Terms of Service to continue.
Read Comments
Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
Posted by: Amber on Jul 29, 2008 at 06:00 PM
When you can ban sexual predators or the kids that the parents don't pay attention to that blow kids away in schools then you can ban my pit, its not going to stop bad owners from breeding pits police have better things to do then go around checking homes to see if they have a pit, they don't even have enough people to catch all the druggies and such, you want a safe neighbor hood why the heck are you in Omaha! Cigarrettes kill more people then dog bites and we do not ban those, bans don't work! my pit would die for me and I would die for my pit. Its not fair that if its passed that a officer will come to my home and take my dog and kill him, your dog will be next people like drama, tell your little kid that there bichon is getting put to sleep becaus of a few stupid people. Pit bulls should never be humane aggressive if they are they need to be put down, they are bred to fight animals not people even fighting dogs have to be able to have humane intervention to doctor them up.

Posted by: Hailey on Jul 12, 2008 at 02:07 PM
All dogs bite so why try to ban just one breed? All dogs can kill EVEN A POMERANIAN which killed a 6 week old baby. People who can't think for themselves are rallying together claiming all pitbulls are bad. If the breed is so terrible then why where they once used as nanny dogs? Dogs only become aggressive because they are trained to be by either the owner or people being mean to it like neighborhood kids. Pitbulls are just big babies that run away from just about every type of water except the one in it's water dish. I say NO on the pitbull ban.

Posted by: Lisa on Jul 5, 2008 at 08:04 PM
All the debates I have heard focus on the dogs themselves. What about the owner. There are plenty of "dangerous" breeds out there. It is the OWNERS' responsiblity to raise these dogs in a responsible home. I don't feel the dogs would pose such a threat if the owners were more responsible. Instead of focusing on the dogs we should be more concerned about the people who own them. People buy these dogs and do not take the time to properly train them and socialize them. I don't feel we need a ban on the dog. However we do need to make certain that these owners are more responsible--and that goes for all dog owners.

Posted by: Travis on Jul 5, 2008 at 01:53 PM
A pit bull ban makes me sick. Have you ever seen some of Omaha's kids. Totaly out of control no boundries no rules but do we talk about banning them. What about criminals. I see them get arrested and back out some of them are killers or child molesters. And we are ignorant enough to try to ban a dog instead of what we really need to take care of.

Posted by: Karen on Jul 3, 2008 at 09:52 PM
Just remember, folks, that dog fighting and breeding human aggro dogs to guard drug operations is big business....these people will not go down without a fight. They are organized, have loads of propaganda websites, and troll the internet fighting BSL. Many of the people posting here are back yard breeders. These dogs are bred primarily by thugs, criminals, and dogfighters....the are genetically disposed to animal aggression and/or human aggression, because they are selectively bred for it. Many have a high prey drive, are dominant, are "game" dogs, (will not stop an attack until they are dead), have a very high threshold for pain, and often exhibit no warning..growling, hackling, etc...before they attack. The breeding of these dogs should be illegal....mandatory spay and neuter, with exceptions for some show dogs, AKC/UKC, not weight pull or the fake registries the dogfighters use. Mandatory microchips for all pits.

Posted by: paige on Jul 2, 2008 at 06:03 PM
Well,where do I start?Three years ago I had a pit bull dog take me off my knees and he seemed sweet but just big.I don't recall why he took me down,no memory ,but I can tell you I WILL NEVER FORGET THAT DAY HE SPLIT MY SKULL BETWEEN THE EYES AND CRUSHED MY FACE ,EATING MY NOSE,LEAVING HAIR,HIS BLOOD ,AND ONE OF HIS TEETH IN MY TEMPLE,HE ALSO ALMOST BIT MY FINGERS OFF AND AT THE LAST PART OF A SECOND THE OWNER PULLED HIM OFF ,WITH MY HELP AND I LOST THE USE OF MY HAND WHICH WAS MY CARREER,i CUT HAIR.NOW ITS BEEN THREE YEARS AND I HAVE LOST EVERYTHING BUT MY TWO WONDERFUL BOYS WHO HEARD IT FROM THE NEWS STATION ON TV BEFORE ANYONE COULD CALL!I live with pain daily and anxiety that controls my world and i have researched these dogs and i can tell you that they were bread to KILL.they are called silent killers and the difference between most otheres is that they bite with 3000 pds.of pressure! if you live your a mirracle!they need to be stopped from being bread!Im a mirracle! BAN,BAN,BAN!!!

Posted by: Ray on Jul 2, 2008 at 02:33 PM
I think to make the matter simple. That the government needs to implament a Identification sytem for the owners of a Pit Bull., Also have the same rules and regulations to own a pit bull as too own a gun. Then things should be more responsible.

Posted by: m on Jul 2, 2008 at 11:55 AM
Ok m, We are not talking about just bites, but ATTACKS. "SHAKE-EM UP SPIKE" let's not ban Pitbulls,let's just ban people from OWNING pitbulls.

Posted by: m on Jul 1, 2008 at 07:54 PM
Dog bans do not remove the irresponsible owners who repeatedly just open the door and let their dogs run without supervision. Also it is important to realize that dogs are pack animals, owners must be the leader of the pack. I have read that dog bites often occur in situations in which the female of the home is not alpha in the dog's eyes. This is very important part of a pack, the female dog is always the leader of a pack. I believe in a time of high crime a good dog is very important to safety of our homes, we cannot depend on the police dept to protect our homes before a crime. Crime is something reported after the fact. A good dog is important even if you have a security system on your home. Just the bark can deter a criminal in a plan for home invasion. Shepherds date back over 3,000 yrs in Europe as very very valuable protector's to man, family, herds & property. Please consider the human part to this dilema.

Posted by: LDL on Jul 1, 2008 at 04:49 AM
It may be argued that Pit Bulls and certain other dog breeds are inherently aggressive towards humans and shouldn't be allowed at all, or that since the breed is so popular, these dogs are often owned by irresponsible owners who provide insufficient training or, worse, aggressiveness training. An opposing argument is that no breed is inherently aggressive towards humans and that regulating one breed simply moves the irresponsible owners to start focusing on breeds that haven't yet been regulated, moving the problem to other breeds. This is one of the positions taken by the CDC and AMVA.

Posted by: Chris on Jul 1, 2008 at 12:09 AM
To E.R., yeah, I agree, life is so unfair. Love your tank top example. Similarly, the boys get to take off their shirts during PE, so shouldn't the girls? Same rules for all! And if all dogs are the same, I can see why you're having trouble believing a pit bull can cause more injury than "a very small dog". I can imagine you at a park with your kids, saying, "It's okay to run up to that pit bull, but stay away from that very small dog! I had a bad experience with one, you know!" So keep believing that boys and girls are the same, all dog breeds are the same, and your personal experience is the total sum of experience needed to judge all dogs. The rest of us should cower at your wisdom, even though you were too inept to defend yourself against a very small dog.

Posted by: Patrick on Jun 30, 2008 at 11:54 PM
Julie, we had responsible owners of fully automatic rifles, but we still banned an entire class of weapons. Now imagine a weapon that can go on a sudden rampage all by itself - that's called a pit bull. Just because you refuse to believe pit bulls will be banned won't stop it from happening. You ask why we don't hear about more attacks in West O, Millard, etc. I know, you want to imply that's where the good owners are. Negative, Julie. That's where the NON-owners are. The attacks happen where the dogs are, and pit bulls aren't such a status symbol in West O and Millard, although Millard is feeling the Omaha influence.

Posted by: Anonymous on Jun 30, 2008 at 11:37 PM
Dennnis, you say there's no reason a whole breed of dog should be banned? But everything else in your comment are reasons TO ban pit bulls, because people don't and won't do the things you say they should. Even the "good owners" don't do those things, because they believe they've raised "good dogs" that are somehow exempt from the naturally aggressive nature of pit bulls. You're right. It's shameful.

Posted by: M on Jun 30, 2008 at 07:49 PM
I do hope that the city council does not put a ban on Pit Bulls- I don't like the breed myself, but if they ban pitbulls then what breed is next? Owners need to be responsible for their dogs-we don't need the city banning dogs.

Posted by: Dennnis on Jun 30, 2008 at 05:53 PM
We should all take notice of the location in which these attacks occur.It's a shame people don't take better care of there dogs, they treat them as if disposable. No dog should have been out in that heat. If you know you have an aggresive dog they should never be left unattended. There are simple ways to make sure innocent people are not harmed, and there are ways to make sure your dog doesn't hurt innocent people. There is no reason a whole breed of dog should be banned. We should be more focused on creating safe neighborhoods where people don't feel the need to turn there dogs into security instead of family. It's shameful

Posted by: Julie on Jun 30, 2008 at 05:41 PM
I refuse to believe that they will ban Pit Bulls, when they need to ban the people that refuse to take proper care of there dogs. We are the proud owners of a loving pit bull named Alice we have had for five incident free years. When we walk around the neighborhood people stop to pet her with no hesitation. We care for her as though part of our family not as a gaurd dog. She has been properly trained, hugged, and kissed. We need to restrict the avalibility to anyone getting a hold of any dog. We need to look more closly at the area in which these attacks happen, you don't hear of attacks in west O, millard,etc. I feel terrible for the baby and her mother,but if the dog were treated properly, restrained properly the insident would probably not occured. You can't ban drugdealers or sexual predators from omaha how can you ban a whole breed of dog? You can't know what any animal is about to do that is why they are called animals. For Alices sake don't judge them all on numerous bad Owners.

Posted by: confused on Jun 30, 2008 at 05:23 PM
So, when it's a pit bull, ban the breed. But if it's a lab, it's owner responsibility? Can we please ban stupid people, instead?

Posted by: Vinny on Jun 30, 2008 at 04:30 PM
I love it.."The owners were stupid.." Funny, I don't recall the owners gnawing on innocent children..IT was the DOGS in all the cases. Get these mutts outta town.

Posted by: Hank on Jun 30, 2008 at 03:34 PM
To "D" in central Omaha...Not "all guns are designed to kill people". There are many guns made for sporting clays and target practice. To everyone claiming bans should be put on Labs as well. Really? Maybe Labs are second because they are by far the most popular breed in Omaha. I would bet that the number of bites per animal is way less than other breeds. Likewise Pit Bulls are probably at the top.

Posted by: Joy on Jun 30, 2008 at 11:57 AM
These dogs need to be banned right now. Why take anymore chances with peoples lives? Get rid of this breed!

Posted by: Steve on Jun 30, 2008 at 11:29 AM
To Wilson.....You're gonna sit here & tell me that labs need to be banned too becuase THEY bite??? GIVE ME A BREAK! Owner's responsibility, NOTHING MORE! Pit bulls & Rottweilers are a menace to kids, ban them both!

Posted by: Anonymous on Jun 30, 2008 at 07:14 AM
Now's the time to let our city council members know where we all stand on this issue. Personally I fell nothing short of an all out ban on pit bulls will solve this problem.

Posted by: Chris on Jun 30, 2008 at 03:28 AM
Kylie, I know you didn't ask the question to get an answer, but there's a good reason "we never hear about any dog other than the pit bulls." Other dogs don't have the extremely high percentage of attacks that pit bulls have. Other dogs don't "lock and shake", as recognized by the US court system. Other dogs don't consistently make the news for ripping scalps off girls or tearing testicles off boys (yes, there are multiple examples of each of these horrific situations). Are you getting the picture, or are you too deep in denial to notice the difference?

Posted by: Anonymous on Jun 30, 2008 at 12:39 AM
Pit bull owners keep screaming that other dogs do everthing pit bulls do, that there's no difference between breeds. If that's true, why are pit bull owners so adamant to own pit bulls. They should be just as happy with any other breed. Unless they're lying.

Posted by: Tones on Jun 30, 2008 at 12:30 AM
Your favorite song must be "Walk Like and Egyptian" because you are living in DENIAL ANNONYMOUS. From what your are saying, I guess that whenever a pitbull mauls someone -(and note that I said MAUL and not just bite) it's because the owner was stupid. (the fact that you have to walk on eggshells with this breed to avoid an attack frenzy is telling enough) Let's do some logical deductions based on that assertion. 1. Whenever pitbulls go off on humans it's because the owners acted stupidly. 2. People who act stupid are stupid. 3. The vast majority of pitbulls will attack with less provocation than other breeds. 4. That means that the vast majority of pitbull owners are ......! Ding ding ding ding ding! ding ding ding ding ding ding ding ding!!!!! Oh wait I meant for that to be like a game show bell! Not a dog fighting bell! I hope you weren't reading that outloud to your pitbull!! If so you are probobly getting mauled right now!

Posted by: E.R. on Jun 29, 2008 at 10:18 PM
I think that if they put a ban on one breed, they need to do it to all breeds. That is like saying that girls can't wear tank tops to school, but boys can, the same rule shoudl apply to all!! I have seen more bites by the smaller dogs. I was attacked by a very small dog and had a face full of stitches. I completely agree with Kylie, ALL dog owners should have strict punishments for the actions of their dogs!!

Posted by: john on Jun 29, 2008 at 05:18 PM
If a person really loves the breed of pitbull he would like the ban so inbreed trailer dwellers dont give the breed a bad name. It takes an exceptional, experienced dog handler to control the breed. Not a tuff guy, an experienced dog handler there is a diffrence. Until then ban the breed.

Posted by: anonymous on Jun 29, 2008 at 05:00 PM
ok, so you people say we should ban pit bulls, what about all the other dogs that have done significant damage to children? my daughter had to have 14 stitches in her neck from a lab that bit her. owners of pit bulls should be responisible for thier dogs, it is how the dog is treated that people should look at. we own two pitbulls and they are not aggressive. they are a part of our family.

Posted by: Anonymous on Jun 29, 2008 at 10:26 AM
To Wilson, what good is jail time when a child is maimed or killed

Posted by: A dog handler on Jun 29, 2008 at 08:50 AM
As a certified dog handler, I agree with both sides of this debate. It is both the handler (dog owner) and the dogs fault. The first thing taught as a handler is that ANY dog can and WILL bite if provoked. With that being said, only the handler will (or should) know what will provoke that action. And I know that many pitbulls are in loving homes that have never shown any aggressiveness what so ever, but, it can, and will, if provoked. But here is the problem, it's the propensity of damage that the dog can do. A pitbull, when provoked is a very fierce animal that has tendicies of causing severe damage. More so that most breeds. That is why they are used as "fighting dogs". That is also one reason (among others) that they are not used for law enforcement. A pitbull, even trained, once provoked, does not want to let go or stop. It wants to continue until the threat has been eliminated. And yes, provocation can be anything, even a child riding in a wagon pulled by her mother.

Posted by: John on Jun 29, 2008 at 07:37 AM
Wilson, the reason you never hear about labs or golden retrievers attacking in the news is the even if one of these types of dogs should attack they are not capable of generating much of a bite. This is due to hundreds of years of breeding for a gentle bite which serves in the job retrievers are bred for. Pit bulls on the other hand are bred for a powerful bite. A pit bull's jaws can generate more power than the jaws of a mountian lion. There aren't many dog breeds with any where near the destructive power of a pit bull. Any type of dog can bite, but only one popular type of dog has been been bred for fighting and the killing of other animals almost exclusively.

Posted by: llr on Jun 28, 2008 at 10:36 PM
Sorry, Wilson, I've been "bit" by a Lab and it never even broke the skin. Horse of a different color, compared to ripping the scalp off a baby.

Posted by: Kylie on Jun 28, 2008 at 09:45 PM
I dont agree with the banning at all. Any breed of dog can bite, but how come we never hear about any dog other than the pitbulls? any dog can cause harm, it is the owners that need to take more responsibility for their pets. Its the owner's and their actions that teach a dog to act, just like children...get the picture? Humans make a dog,or child, act and behave in certain ways-shootings, suicide, dropping out of high school, drugs are all examples. I believe we need to make more strict punishments for the owners of ANY dog that bites, ANY DOG. But banning of a breed is not the answer. What will happen to all the dogs in rescue that were brought into this world just to be put to sleep never having a chance in life...this sickens me. I personally am in rescue and can not believe the city of Omaha is even considering it. The people governing our city can come up with a better solution than that. Educate owners on any breed and lives will be saved.

Posted by: JD on Jun 28, 2008 at 08:55 PM
What an uniformed ignorant world we live in.

Posted by: Chey on Jun 28, 2008 at 07:30 PM
This is ridiculous. I cant belive we have such closed mineded people in this city, it sickens me. I have 2 pit bulls now, and have had 4 befor them. They are amazing, yes some are aggressive because THIER OWNERS DONT CONTROL THEM. I am just sick of these irresponsible owners not doing their job with these wonderful dogs to keep people like you guys saying such horrible things. Yes they should of had control, but they didnt, so give them a higher fine and throw them in jail. I hate having to watch everything i do with my dogs because of you people assuming their monsters. Did i mention my boyfriend has a 5 year old who has grown up with one and always plays with them?

Posted by: Tracy on Jun 28, 2008 at 06:03 PM
Why should innocent people esp children have to pay w/ their flesh, blood and lives for the failures of dog owners, breeders, what have you?? The nature of attacks in this breed is in the bloodline going back generations! Unlike real watch dogs, you cannot predict what, when or who will trigger a pitbull attack, making the argument that (the dog) "has never shown aggression before.." null and void!! As for the idea of requiring owners to carry insurance, this completely misses the real issue!! Taking action to PREVENT years of post traumatic stress, rehabilitation, corrective surgeries and funeral costs are what's called for here!! WHO CARES ABOUT THE MONEY or financial protection for the owners of these dogs!! It's obvious a ban is needed yesterday!!

Posted by: Wilson on Jun 28, 2008 at 05:45 PM
If the city is banning Pit Bulls, then they should also ban the other breeds like Labs that also have high bite rates! I have a Pit Bull and have had them for over 8 years and I have never had an incident. I believe that there should be harsher penalties for the owners of the dogs, don't penalize the breed, penalize the owners with higher fines or even jail time. That could help the stem the mistreatment of the dogs that ultimately ends in meaner dogs.

Posted by: Michaela on Jun 28, 2008 at 05:16 PM
How many children will be attacked before we band these overly aggressive dogs? They are to much of a risk for injury to the neighborhoods they live in. The city needs to take action to save lives.

Posted by: John on Jun 28, 2008 at 04:00 PM
Since we can't all agree whether to ban pit bulls or not, how about a compromise that any responsible dog owner can live by. How about requiring pit bull owners and other owners of large dogs carry insurance policies on their animals, and require them to be registered as a lethal weapon. I own German Shepherd so a law like this would apply to me too. I've trained my dog and I'm pretty certain of his behavior in any situation. I would have no problem with a law like this. Let's see if all these pit bull owners who say their dogs are so sweet are willing to put their money where their mouth is.

Posted by: Ed on Jun 28, 2008 at 03:40 PM
Of Course Pit Bulls should be banned, are you kidding me? They rip off a child's head and some people don't want everyone of them destroyed? Just amazing.

Posted by: Lisa on Jun 28, 2008 at 02:48 PM
I dont agree with banning pitbulls or any other dogs. It isnt the dog that is the problem, it is the person raising them. I have two pit bulls and they are a big baby. I can hold them just like a baby, they arent happy unless they are included in family activities. The only problem I have with my male, is he gets into the trash when I am not home, but I put him in a kennel and he is fine. If people would use some common sense with these dogs there wouldnt be a problem. I some times think people get bit, due to their already big fear. They are a good dog, just give them a chance.

Posted by: To the "It's the Owner" on Jun 28, 2008 at 09:50 AM
To all you using that ridiculous cop out: When a man shoots another man, do you blame his parents? You blame HIM. People and dogs can be raised by wonderful loving people, doesn't mean they won't eventually hurt someone terribly someday. Stop posting that crap, the BREED is a KILLING breed. They have 1 single purpose, and they accomplish it with intense jaw strength and extra thick skulls. Protect is their goal, and mauling is their way to accomplish. They don't just tear your pant leg, or growl, they ATTACK! Yes, there are SOME Pits that are not killers, there are some that could live a perfectly good, tame life, however, should we really play chance with something that is PROVEN to be a source of many MANY viscious attacks?!!?!?!

Posted by: Anonymous on Jun 27, 2008 at 08:42 AM
Pete, your plan wont work. These people do not have the desire to learn. Therefore, trying to educate them on pet care would be an inefficient use of your time.

Posted by: Anonymous on Jun 27, 2008 at 08:37 AM
The owners know they are bad dogs. They are just trying to be tough. And if they don't know this, then the REALLY shouldn't have a pit bull.

Posted by: mike on Jun 27, 2008 at 08:35 AM
Pam Weise of the Humane Society - just look across the river at Council Bluffs and see what happened after they banned Pit Bulls - attacks dropped dramatically - these dogs don't bite, they attack - its real simple - ban them now

Posted by: Mike on Jun 27, 2008 at 08:08 AM
To AT and LSB, How many Labs have you seen or heard bitting the scalp off of a baby? Or the genitals of a little boy?

Posted by: Pibble on Jun 27, 2008 at 08:06 AM
Identify the "Pit Bull" http://www.understand-a-bull.com/Findthebull/findpitbull_v4.swf "Pit Bull" is a term encompassing 3 Breeds. There are 20 Breeds mistaken for "Pit Bulls" Better make sure your dog doesn`t have a square head and short hair!

Posted by: A mom on Jun 27, 2008 at 08:00 AM
Amazing, 210 dog bites in Omaha in 2008, 48 from Pit Bulls! Why is taking so long to do something about this problem? Ridiculous! How many more children, who are the most vulnerable, have to be scarred for life?

Posted by: Darren on Jun 27, 2008 at 07:45 AM
Here is the web address to find phone numbers, emails and mailing addresses of all city council members and the mayor. We need to let these folks know it is time they step up and LEAD this city on this issue. Ban these vicious beasts! http://www.ci.omaha.ne.us/

Posted by: D on Jun 27, 2008 at 07:41 AM
I'm not here to defend pitbulls by any means because that was my child I would want to do more than ban the pit bull, Patrick all guns are designed to kill people.

Posted by: katrina on Jun 27, 2008 at 07:31 AM
its not the dog or the breed, EDUCATE YOURSELVES PEOPLE.it the owners & the breeders. inbreading & flat out irresponsible owners ar the target here not the individual dog.is like banning all colored people( white, brown, blue or green)if a few snapped & attacked. there not interlinked, they are individuals

Posted by: brad on Jun 27, 2008 at 07:05 AM
Smoking in doors was banned to protect people- Pit bulls need to be banned as well. They are an aggressive, dangerous breed. Brett- how would you like it if I moved in next door to you and brought a mountain lion with me ? Pete- I had neighbors who had 2 of these animals. Although I kept my 8-pound chihuahua on a chain, they let their pit bulls roam the neighborhood unrestrained. No amount of education is going to make an irresponsible person responsible. Ban them.

Posted by: Karin on Jun 27, 2008 at 06:32 AM
BAN THEM NOW! A NO BRAINER!

Posted by: TS on Jun 27, 2008 at 06:00 AM
I agree with Tones that the "docile" Pit Bulls are potential ticking time bombs. Overwhelmingly when a Pit attacks the owner says "He/she has been raised with kids and has never displayed this behavior before...." I've never heard one say that "he/she attacked my uncle last week but I didn't think it would happen again"! The people that own Pit's need to get real. They are not just any dog. No matter how they are raised, they have a genetic pre-disposition that many dog owners cannot handle. Spare society. I don't care about educating a dog owner but I do care about kids and people. Own a breed that integrates well with society. Your lives will not be meaningless if you can't own a Pit!

Posted by: t on Jun 27, 2008 at 05:36 AM
This is a breed that needs to be banned from public ownership, along with rotweilers. they were and are a breed that was bred for guarding royal families for centurys. They regarless of handlers, will strike and attack at any given moment.We have lots of towns and cities that have banned new ownership, and mandating that current owners not only have the dogs put through obedience schools, but carry max insurance. This is the way to handle this. The responsibility of the owner, is no diff, then for your kids. If they do something wrong, then you have to pay..I hope the young child recovers fully, and is young enough to not be emotionally scarred.

Posted by: Rid of 'em! on Jun 27, 2008 at 04:53 AM
Funny how it's the same story with pit bull owners with "nice" dogs and the ones that end up attacking people. "They are (or were) a nice dog. Never hurt a fly." That's part of the ignorance of pit bull owners. They are unpredictable and can snap at any moment. All of them! It's the way they've been bred for 100s of years. The potential and the history of this breed alone should be enough for a ban. You cannot compare labs to pit bulls. Because they are #1 and #2 in reported bites? Give me a break! Let's look at the damage inflicted between the two. There's a reason why you don't hear about other breeds biting in the news. It's because other dogs for the most part don't tear apart toddlers and attack cops. Give me a break pit bull lovers! They're an unnatural, unpredictable, viscious breed. BAN THEM!!!

Posted by: Patrick on Jun 27, 2008 at 01:32 AM
AT, so you want to compare dogs to guns... Okay: We banned automatic rifles, because they were designed for one reason: to kill people. We need to ban pit bulls, because they were bred for one reason: to fight. End of discussion.

Posted by: Pete on Jun 27, 2008 at 12:35 AM
How many people that contribute to this board would be willing to contribute in finding a reasonable solution to this problem? I, for one, would be willing to do my part in helping educate these negligent owners in our community, because that is what's needed here, not a ban. More emphasis should be towards containing illegal firearms in this city, as we all know because THAT is the primary cause of wrongful death in Omaha, NOT pitbulls. Anyone interested in joining hands to help find a VIABLE solution to end these attacks, feel free to email me at bogey_68106@yahoo.com. Together we can help educate owners to do OUR part in ending these vicious attacks and making our community safer. Actions speak louder than ANY debate on a news board. Are you willing to do YOUR part? I am, and I will need help in doing so. For one, I would like to start a pitbull registry to help locate and educate owners. Mr. Vokal, there are citizens willing to help solve the problem. All I need is a hotline #.

Posted by: brett on Jun 27, 2008 at 12:18 AM
i have a pitbull and i also have to kids and and my kids and dog get along great they pull his ears and tail and he dose not even nip it the way there raised and i was raised with one that protected my family in north omaha and we never got bit by it.Every dog bites even the small lap dogs so its not the breed it is the owner

Posted by: CBO on Jun 27, 2008 at 12:09 AM
Absolutely ban Pit Bulls. I am a dog-lover-have 2 mixed breeds. But I see pitbulls in my area and often loose. I see houses here with 2 or more of the animals and I have seen several homes where there was obvious indiscrimnate breeding. One of my daughters was chased by a pit on her walk to the busstop last spring. Also these dogs will agressively enter yards even where other dogs are. Please ban these and forget the "grandfather" clause.

Posted by: Tones on Jun 27, 2008 at 12:00 AM
Pitbulls are either one or the other -- a proven vicious dog, or a TICKING TIME BOMB!! Yes labs are the #2 biter, but lab bites are just that -- bites -- when a pitbull attacks, it's a BLOODBATH. The breed needs to be banned in Omaha.

Posted by: There is no Debate on Jun 26, 2008 at 11:37 PM
BAN THEM! Mandating higher insurance laws really works, just like vehicle registration, parking tickets, and various other things people blow off. Pits are a cheap security system. A lot of times, people have them because of the area of town they live in, while a good solution, they offer a very HIGH potential for an incident just like the other night. How many children need to be scarred for life before people stop making excuses? You wouldn't make an excuse for a kid who shoots another kid, ye a dog, property in the eyes of the law, is excusable when they commit such horrible attacks?! If I attacked a little kid like that dog did I'd be burned beyond belief by the media and people. No one would say "IT's HIS PARENTS!" yet a dog with an extra thick skull, and jaws that can rip an arm out of the socket is just so inncent?! This WHOLE breed is so beyond fixing. The genetics of Pits are so corrupted and contaminated. Pits have 1 purpose. Their job is to defend and kill. So why defend them

Posted by: llr on Jun 26, 2008 at 11:25 PM
I have a letter to the City Council and the Mayor going in the mail tomorrow, marked URGENT. If the City can ban smoking because of potential hazards from second-hand smoke, they can ban these worthless wastes of oxygen. I'd rather walk into a keno parlor or the horse track & breathe second-hand smoke, than be walking down the street & have my face taken off by one of these monsters. Think I'll send a copy to the American Kennel Club while I'm at it;they need to quit reconizing the breed as an actual DOG breed, when it should be in a shark show, or alligator show,with the other killing machines. Oh, & you people calling your dogs BOXERS when they really are pit bulls...give me a BREAK. Your boxers look nothing LIKE the ones I see on the street, or dog shows. And HALF-boxer doesn't make it NOT a pit bull. AND, my brother does have a chocolate lab who is kind of a nipper,but NO one in our family has had to undergo 3-hour surgery because she bit us! She never has even broke skin!

Posted by: Kathy on Jun 26, 2008 at 11:11 PM
When's the last time you heard "Baby attacked by a vicious black lab!" Pit Bulls are almost always owned by specific people that view them as their pathetic "status symbols." They're all for show and bred to kill. These pit bull owners don't think they're so tough if they own a cocker spaniel.

Posted by: Fred on Jun 26, 2008 at 11:05 PM
Is the pit bull owner on Pine Street going to pony up for the medical costs incurred by the victums? Maybe the owners of agressive animals should be required to carry a high dollar liability insurance policy. $500,000 seems like a fair amount.

Posted by: Mike on Jun 26, 2008 at 10:54 PM
My question is: Why do we need Pit Bulls?

Posted by: Jennifer on Jun 26, 2008 at 10:17 PM
My Uncle is a father of 7 and a pitbull owner and I have never seen that dog violent in any way, to anyone. In fact, the mailman pets him everyday as he delivers the mail. Why should an entire breed be punished? Would we banish an entire breed or nationality of people because of their "possible violent behavior"? No. The real problem is the owner, not the dog itself.

Posted by: infidel on Jun 26, 2008 at 09:09 PM
I'd take a bite from a Lab any day over a pitbull bite. you pit owners sound like sigfreid ad roy defending their tigers after they got attacked. A tiger is a tiger....

Posted by: J L on Jun 26, 2008 at 08:36 PM
Where's the debate? Many of us are tired of having to worry about having our family, pets, or selves attacked by pit bulls. And the pit bull lovers don't care about the rest of us, or what we think. The foregoing article list numbers of dog bites. What it doesn't break down by breed is the numbers of dog bites that required medical attention or ER visits. Something else this article doesn't address is that the pit bull breed has no valid purpose as a domesticated animal. We've already E-mailed our district city council member and let him know we're tired of all the pit bulls that run loose in our neighborhood. We've had more than our share of run-ins with pit bulls, and none of them where positive experiences.

Posted by: K.R. on Jun 26, 2008 at 08:17 PM
Kill them all. They are fighting dogs. That is all they know.

Posted by: BillJ on Jun 26, 2008 at 08:07 PM
Say what you want about pit bulls...how they aren't bad dogs...it's just the way they're trained...The bottome line is that there is 500 years of blood lines that say these animals are vicious and relentless...Provoked or not. BAN THESE DOGS NOW! Fahey and the City Council need to BAND THESE DOGS NOW! Fining owners won't help this little girl--and countless other heal from an attack. BAN THESE DOGS NOW!!! How many more people, have to be injured, mamed and killed? BAN THESE DOGS NOW!!!

Posted by: michael on Jun 26, 2008 at 07:05 PM
My neighbor's pit bull got loose and would have attacked my wife but for the baseball bat I grabbed. I almost killed that nasty animal, and would have if it hadn't run away. I told my neighbor if I ever saw his dog in my yard again, I would come after HIM. He has since built a kennel that I assume will cage his worthless "pet". These dogs are just as nasty as the owners who defend them. Oh, and btw, my yard isn't your dog's toilet. Omaha dog owners are generally low class and rude, as evidenced by all the feces they pollute our city with. Ban these worthless dogs!

Posted by: AT on Jun 26, 2008 at 06:51 PM
If you ban the Pit Bull then you have to ban the Lab then also since they are the #2 biters. Hey I got an idea Mr Vokal, since you want to, and I quote,"protect the health and safety of Omaha." why not ban guns cause you know they cause alot more injuries and deaths that a dog of any breed.

Posted by: Jason on Jun 26, 2008 at 06:42 PM
The only thing pitbulls are good for is target practice for the police department. Some of these dog owners should not even be able to own a gerbil let alone a pitbull. I own a black lab and when we walk him we use a harness because he can slip right out of a collar. This woman who owned that pitbull that attacked the kids and their parents, should pay big time for her ignorance.

Posted by: LSB on Jun 26, 2008 at 06:20 PM
If labs and sheppards are also biting make sure to also include those breeds in the ban. Any breed can bite, it is all in the owner/handler.

Channel 6 News Features