WOWT.com on Demand
  • 6 On Your Cell
  • RSS Feeds
  • Desktop Alert
  • Text Alerts
  • Daily E-News
  • What’s on 6
  • Children's Programming Changes
    YouCast - Submit Pics and Video
    "Picture Perfect" Contest
    Watch NBC Shows Online
    6 News Features
    On Your Side
    Don't miss the latest On Your Side segments.
    McKnight Investigates
    Catch all of McKnight Investigates here.
    Heartland's Most Wanted
    Catch all of Heartland's Most Wanted here.
    Product Recalls
    Check for threats that might be in your home.
    Family Health
    Don't miss the latest from Family Health.
    MarketPlace
  • Restaurants
  • Go Green!
  • Auto Map
  • Business Connections
  • Financial Advice
  • Legal Advice
  • New Home Listings
  • Your Home, Your Investment
  • Entertainment
  • Recipes
  • Jobs
  • The Wedding Planner
  • Martha's Tip of the Day
  • Advertise With WOWT
  • Crackdown on Driving Distractions Save Email Print
    Grant money funds enforcement
    Posted: 9:23 PM May 15, 2008
    Last Updated: 9:23 PM May 15, 2008

    A | A | A

    Omaha Police are taking advantage of grant money to crack down on the kind of driving distractions that contribute to a lot of traffic accidents.

    They say that distracted drivers cause 80 percent of all crashes.

    Ewald Sender of Springfield has seen a lot of this.

    He says, "I see them read newspapers -- women put on their make-up."

    Police say that most crashes that result from these incidents happen within three seconds of the distraction. The most common is talking on a cell phone.

    Omaha Police Officer Chuck Casey says it's just a matter of, "people doing things they shouldn't be doing while driving: writing things down; eating fast food they just ordered."

    We rode along with Casey on a special enforcement operation at 120th and Bel Drive, one of the city's most accident-prone intersections.

    He says the goal is, "enforcing violations that are typical during accidents -- most commonly speeding, violating traffic signals and again, improper turns."

    You can't be pulled over for multi-tasking in the car but if it leads to a crash, you could be cited for careless or negligent driving, punishable by up to six months in jail.

    "That is a common offense we do enforce here in Omaha," Officer Casey said.

    This is just one of several special enforcements that Omaha Police will be doing with the help of federal grant money.

    More Stories
    Husker Fans Keeping The Faith

    Unmarked Police Car Shot At

    Fight Between Brothers Ends In Gunfire

    Papillion Man Critically Injured In Crash

    Running From Omaha To Lincoln

    Home Rebuilt, Ranger Returns To Little Sioux Camp

    Rendezvous Leads To Robbery

    Suspect Sought In Stabbing

    Post Your Comments
    First Name:
    Location:
    Enter Comments: characters left
    Email (optional):
    Email will not be displayed on site. For station contact purpose only.
    Read Comments
    Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
    Posted by: Dave on May 20, 2008 at 02:19 PM
    I've been tail-gated on the North Freeway by an Omaha police officer. I watch a Carter Lake cop pull away from a traffic stop where, presumably, he wrote a ticket. He changed lanes without signalling and did the same when he turned left on Locust. They have a tough job, without a doubt. Although it doesn't excuse bad driving by regular citizens, shouldn't they set an example?

    Posted by: The Original Cop on May 19, 2008 at 09:52 AM
    Tom- There is no law against talking on a cell phone while driving. If you on a cell phone leads to you crossing the lane lines, failing to signal etc. then that becomes negligent or careless driving which is against the law. You go ahead and talk on your cell phone all day long and you won't get stopped for just that because it is LEGAL!

    Posted by: Lee on May 19, 2008 at 08:20 AM
    I respect the OPD more for the 2 yrs that I lived there then I do the police here in Maine in which I have lived for 30 yrs..they have a LOT more to deal with (shootings, gangs, etc) on a daily basis there in Omaha alone then in Maine..I failed to update my license when I got pulled over one time near the Civic Auditorum and the officer was stern telling me he could of arrested me and impound my car but he was more then fair with me...gave me a summons and had my wife drive home. The police here wouldnt do that cuz I know lot of officers I went 2 to high school with and didnt get along with. Up here they expect you to bow down/kiss there butts but in Omaha the vast majority of officers are very good ppl with a VERY stressful job. Rather live in Omaha. My wife when she was a MGR at McD's would not have the OPD on duty 2 pay 4 there meals telling them that they protect us so I am going to feed ya for looking out for us..a kind act from her where the officers deep down appreciated.

    Posted by: Tom on May 18, 2008 at 07:53 PM
    Are they going to crak down on police officers talking on cell phones while driving police cars .

    Posted by: The Original Cop on May 18, 2008 at 10:58 AM
    Jennifer- I am a cop. I work in the northeast precinct on the evening shift. Why don't you come down and see what we deal with. We only respond lights and sirens to active felony crime calls or felonies just occurred, oh and personal injury accidents. All other calls we are trying to get there as fast as we can safely. If an officer has to go through a light they will turn on their lights, but if they are just speeding and weaving in and out of traffic to get there, that is not grounds for lights and sirens. If your neighbor calls and says your husband is beating you, that is not a lights and sirens call, but I bet you'd like us to get there as fast as possible. It's amazing to me how this story could turn into a bash the po-po fest. If you see one of my officers driving like a$$ to hurry up to get lunch then by all means turn them in to me and I'll deal with it. (be careful they may actually have been called to that restaurant for something) Otherwise we have do drive fast etc

    Posted by: C on May 17, 2008 at 12:09 PM
    Sorry, the Cop parking is on 25th and L on the south side of teh firehouse.

    Posted by: Kent on May 17, 2008 at 08:14 AM
    If a person can't be pulled over for "multi-tasking" and can only be charged after an incident, exactly what will this grant enable police to do that they aren't already doing (or supposed to be doing)?

    Posted by: Lori on May 16, 2008 at 10:42 PM
    I won't say "always" but I will say that 98% of the time I see officers NOT wearing their seatbelts. Why is this OK for them and not for the rest of us? Then there's the person who ran into a tree earlier this week because she was eating MACARONI AND CHEESE in the car (it happened near my place of work and I heard about it from the cops). C'mon, a burger is one thing, but a bowl of Easy Mac with a SPOON? I won't even attempt a TACO while driving.

    Posted by: O' cop? on May 16, 2008 at 09:17 PM
    So, if you follow a "person" in a OPD uniform early morning, from 33rd and W st to the cop parking lot on 23rd and L and NO turn signals are used (left and right multiple times), NO (3) second stop sign @ stops signs. THE COP IS ON A "EMERGENCEY CALL"??????

    Posted by: Irritated on May 16, 2008 at 08:56 PM
    To everyone attacking the police, officers sometimes feel it is their privilege to weave through traffic as they do. And in some cases they are in the right. What's everyone else's excuse? Case in point, two days ago my brother was nearly killed doing road work by a man who was distracted and driving 65 , with his infant daughter in the back seat! He hit their machinery then would have went straight down a ravine if those steel mailboxes wouldn't have stopped him. He should have been paying attention. And one would think a loving father would have been more vigilant with his child in the car? Look people, who cares who is doing it, you, the police, those idiots who have to be somewhere in the blink of an eye, the fools who think that they can move their car like liquid mercury through traffic, everyone needs to realize that their lives aren't the only ones in danger because of their absent minded, no stupid, habits. That is the problem and that is why innocents die.

    Posted by: Andy on May 16, 2008 at 08:14 PM
    Any more I see lots of officers that are on patrol, talking on their cell phone. I'm guessing more times than not that the phone is not being used for official business.

    Posted by: A on May 16, 2008 at 04:32 PM
    Ok, so there are officer who at times fail to use their turn signals or make a wide lane change...Shame on them for attepting to do another vital task such as obtaining directions or confering with a fellow officer to get to your 911 call involving a major disturbance or other potential life threatening situation. I guess you believe that eating a cheeseburger or your laziness to just use the signal is the same thing!!!! And you call the police hypocritical!

    Posted by: Rosey on May 16, 2008 at 03:12 PM
    This is a total joke. I got rear ended by a women talking on a cell phone. She then proceeded to write down her information on one of her insurance agent's cards and told me she was "late for a meeting" and had to go. Meanwhile I am on the phone with 911 who is telling me that it is okay for her to leave because she has given me her information. After she left, I went home and called the police in order to get a police report filed. You know, the insurance company for the negligent individual always says "did you call the police?". Well, the officer bascially told me he wasn't going to send anyone to my house, nor should I come to the station to fill out a report. He said the only option was to start a "criminal traffic investigation", but he advised against it, because it would "open a can of worms". I told the officer she hit me while I was stopped at a red light and that she was talking on her cell. He couldn't have cared less.

    Posted by: Amy on May 16, 2008 at 02:26 PM
    I HATE all these negative comments--everyone is too critical of everyone else. I'll be the first POSITIVE comment--thanks OPD for all you do-your job is hard but you do a great job. Ignore all these crabbies.

    Posted by: Jeff on May 16, 2008 at 02:24 PM
    Why don't they use the grant money to give to oil companies to lower fuel cost.

    Posted by: Jeff on May 16, 2008 at 02:21 PM
    Police want to crack down on distractive driver's...what about the Police Officers who drive around in their cars TALKING on cell phones. If they are going pursue this action, then they should start with themselves first. If I were to drive for 2 hours a night and count the different Police cars with officers talking on cell phones the whole OPD would be ticketed!!!!!!!!!!

    Posted by: WeNeedAPoliceAuditor on May 16, 2008 at 02:01 PM
    Once more, we see the police being treated as if they were kings while the rest of the people treated like nothing. The difference between an offense committed by a police officer and one committed by anybody else is that the police officer will NEVER get punished. Show me one police officer paying a fine for speeding while driving their cruiser. ‘It’s an emergency,’ they’d always say if anybody bothered to ask them. We need a neutral hand in cleaning up the police department together with their attitude and mentality. We need a public police auditor accountable to us and not to a ‘grand jury’ or ‘mayoral committee’. We need to stop the myth of the untouchable police army ‘performing their jobs’ while breaking all the laws they are supposed to enforce.

    Posted by: Ewwww! on May 16, 2008 at 12:58 PM
    If you are going to pick on women for putting on make up while they are driving lets be fair and "Pick" on the men the pick there noses while they are driving! That is one multitasking offense that should be stopped!!! Both hands on the wheel men! Not one on the wheel and one up the nose!!!

    Posted by: Jennnifer on May 16, 2008 at 12:30 PM
    to the original cop, you dont sound so much like a cop bc to respond to any call when using speed you have to use your lights and sirens its a warning of an emergency vehichle at a faster speed then the posted. So Rm does have apoint about police speeding and getting away with it.

    Posted by: J on May 16, 2008 at 12:15 PM
    WOW PCF - you "always" see police doing this? No one ALWAYS does something, so I bet if you looked, you might see "some" or even "a lot", but you won't always see it. You lost my interest when you generalized. I am all for putting a law into place that requires drivers to use a hands free device while talking on the phone. It may still be a distraction, but in theory, they should have two hands available to drive.

    Posted by: Kendahl on May 16, 2008 at 11:20 AM
    lm: Before you change lanes, look behind you, not just to the side. If a vehicle is catching up to you and you don't want to go that fast, wait for it to pass.

    Posted by: Bob on May 16, 2008 at 10:42 AM
    I agree with BM and citizen. These "law enforcers" do the exact same thing as everybody else. They eat while they drive, talk on their cell phones, don't pay attention to the road. They make their wide turns into the wrong lane and I even saw one nod off at a street light. And these are the people they call "police"? We are all doomed!!

    Posted by: The Original Cop on May 16, 2008 at 10:42 AM
    Greenie- Yes we receive grant money to deal with gang violence, gun and drug activities in "Weed and Seed" areas. Lindi- Grant money is earmarked for specific purposes! You can't use a DUI grant to address gang violence, just like whatever the parameters of this grant are, are specific to this issue and can't be used for other issues. The northeast precinct, for one, has it's own civilian coordinator that helps apply for and secure grant money to address the violence issues. RM- You ever even consider that officer was on their way to a call? Officers don't respond lights and sirens to every call they go on or you would hear nothing but sirens in this city.

    Posted by: Biff on May 16, 2008 at 10:20 AM
    It is very frustrating to me that increased enforcement of traffic violations only comes about as a result of "special grants" - HELLO - isn't enforcement of traffic laws something that's supposed to occur every day? Help me understand this.....my job consists of many types of duties, and I am expected to perform ALL of them ALL of the time, and I don't get extra money to focus on just one of them. Why is this different with law enforcement?

    Posted by: OmahaAnnie on May 16, 2008 at 09:49 AM
    Cite those who ride their brakes as well as those who are "left lane vigilantes".

    Posted by: citizen on May 16, 2008 at 09:34 AM
    this is crap. they are talking about drivers being on their cell phones? I drive around a lot. and i ALWAYS see at least 3 police officers on their cell phones while driving. We are not the only ones that do it. maybe they should follow what they are trying to inforce.

    Posted by: PCF on May 16, 2008 at 09:32 AM
    I agree with BM, I always see police turning or switching lanes and not use turning signals. I always see police not make a full "3" second stop at a stop sign...I can go on and on. Use federal grant money to give them driving lessons too! and give them a ticket! Remeber OPD, Click it or loose it? well it's time for you to start doing the same thing.

    Posted by: Keith on May 16, 2008 at 08:54 AM
    Whats this about driving distractions? Sorry, I was too busy eating tacos, shaving, reading the newspaper, watching TV, and talking on the cell phone while driving to catch what this news story was about.

    Posted by: Chris on May 16, 2008 at 08:19 AM
    BM you are so right I saw a Papillion Officer coming out of Cary St turning left onto 84th heading South, turn into the inside lane which is cool, but then he moved over to the outside lane with guess what? NO SIGNAL! They should pull no one over for no signal violations if they can not follow them themselves!

    Posted by: Scott on May 16, 2008 at 08:08 AM
    HANG UP AND DRIVE!!!!

    Posted by: jef m on May 16, 2008 at 07:30 AM
    ban cell phones people talk on them like there sitting at home

    Posted by: rm on May 16, 2008 at 07:29 AM
    yes people all in hurry to race to the next red light follow to close speed but one day on the interstate a police car flying changing lanes it was a flash past me if i would change lane there have a major accident i think the law needs tofollow safety as we should to

    Posted by: Gary on May 16, 2008 at 07:20 AM
    Good. It's about time. ESPECIALLY the cell phone users. And while you're at it, crack down on the cigarette tossers too.

    Posted by: Lindi on May 16, 2008 at 07:06 AM
    They should be using that money for stopping gangs, not women putting on their make-up. I do understand that distractions (cell phones etc.) aren't exactly a good thing, but this grant should be used for more important problems.

    Posted by: Greenie on May 16, 2008 at 07:06 AM
    Though this is a worthy cause, I would like to know if we are receiving any federal grant money to deal with gang violence, which is also a large problem in the metro area.

    Posted by: citizen on May 16, 2008 at 07:04 AM
    Wow!! OPD ticketing people for what these hypocrite cops do behind the wheel of their cruisers. ahhhh! Elitists who are above the law. AND yet another grant to get OPD to do what they should be doing anyway.

    Posted by: Wide Turn on May 16, 2008 at 04:25 AM
    I often see drivers "turning wide", because they're one-handed - the other hand is on a phone, shaver, cheeseburger, latte, etc.

    Posted by: BM on May 16, 2008 at 12:01 AM
    Illegal turns??? Rarely do I see even police officers turning into the correct lane. It's time for the police to start following the law when it comes to using turn signals and turing into the proper lane.

    Posted by: T on May 15, 2008 at 09:43 PM
    Why not crack down on the gang bangers in north Omaha - what a strange set of priorities.

    Media Partners