WOWT.com on Demand
  • 6 On Your Cell
  • RSS Feeds
  • Desktop Alert
    		•
  • Text Alerts
  • Daily E-News
  • What’s on 6
    • Children's Programming Changes
    YouCast - Submit Pics and Video
    Watch NBC Shows Online
    6 News Features
    On Your Side
    Don't miss the latest On Your Side segments.
    McKnight Investigates
    Catch all of McKnight Investigates here.
    Heartland's Most Wanted
    Catch all of Heartland's Most Wanted here.
    Product Recalls
    Check for threats that might be in your home.
    Family Health
    Don't miss the latest from Family Health.
    MarketPlace
  • Restaurants
  • Go Green!
  • Auto Map
  • Business Connections
  • Financial Advice
  • Legal Advice
  • New Home Listings
  • Your Home, Your Investment
  • Entertainment
  • Recipes
  • Jobs
  • The Wedding Planner
  • Martha's Tip of the Day
  • Advertise With WOWT
    • Jury Splits on Assault Decision Save Email Print
    Posted: 4:06 PM May 9, 2008
     Last Updated: 4:06 PM May 9, 2008
    4 comments
    A | A | A

    A jury has convicted a heartland man on one of three counts related to his alleged attack on a heartland officer.

    Carlos Rosado was found guilty of obstructing a police officer but he was acquitted of a resisting arrest charge and the jury couldn't come to any decision on the charge of assault.

    The case relates to a fight at the Southgate Apartments in Bellevue last year.

    Relatives of Rosado claimed the officer overstepped his bounds and never identified himself to the family.
    More Stories
    4 Arrested in Armed Robbery

    Bold Move by Federal Reserve

    Paypal Layoffs

    Two More Left Under Safe Haven

    		 Short Cut Cut Off

    Water Main Break Closes School

    Nader Coming to Omaha

    Campus Warnings On Facebook?
    Post Your Comments
    First Name:
    Location:
    Enter Comments: characters left
    Email (optional):
    Email will not be displayed on site. For station contact purpose only.
    Read Comments
    Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
    Posted by: Just the facts on May 10, 2008 at 09:52 PM
    The officer was working in an off-duty capacity as a security guard for the apartment complex. He was in an unmarked car and not wearing the departmental prescribed uniform for patrol work and did not display his credentials as required by law. This information was disclosed during the trial.
    Posted by: Dave on May 10, 2008 at 10:28 AM
    I have an idea for the officers. NEVER EVER respond to any call concerning that family in the future. Is the family such MORONS they did not know he was a cop?
    Posted by: Anonymous on May 10, 2008 at 10:15 AM
    The police officer was there to keep the people who live there safe & I think the least the jury could do would be to protect the police officer.
    Posted by: Upset on May 9, 2008 at 05:32 PM
    Perhaps he should claim that he has a mental conditian so that he will not be charged.
    Media Partners
     
    Home - News - Weather - Sports - Blogs - 6 on Your Side - Family Health - Reminders Board -
    Schools - CityCAMS - Drivetime Saver - Channel 6 for the Heartland - Health Check - Lottery - Gas Prices -
    Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - EEO Statement - FCC Form 388
    Gray Television, Inc. - Copyright © 2002-2008 - Designed and Powered by Clickability