Find a Local Business with Local Lookup
 
WOWT.com on Demand
  • 6 On Your Cell
  • RSS Feeds
  • Desktop Alert
  • Text Alerts
  • Daily E-News
  • What’s on 6
  • MarketPlace
  • Restaurants
  • Auto Map
  • Business Connections
  • Financial Advice
  • Legal Advice
  • New Home Listings
  • Your Home, Your Investment
  • Entertainment
  • Recipes
  • Education
  • Jobs
  • The Wedding Planner
  • Martha's Tip of the Day
  • Advertise With WOWT
  • Cruelty To Animals Suspect In Court Save Email Print
    New law makes crime a felony
    Posted: 3:25 PM May 5, 2008
    Last Updated: 7:07 PM May 5, 2008


    A | A | A

    An Omaha man whose dog froze and starved to death in February, made his first appearance before a judge Monday where he waived his right to a preliminary hearing.

    Keion Shelton faces a felony charge of cruelty to animals. Investigators say he left home for at least a week while leaving his pit bull outside without adequate food, water or shelter.

    "People simply can't leave their animals out without food, water, and shelter in any kind of weather situation,” says Mark Langan with the Nebraska Humane Society. “We find more and more people just forget about the animals and leave them out. The animals are dying, which now will be a felony prosecution."

    Shelton, who is out on bond, is the first person in Douglas County to be tried under a new law that makes the crime a felony.

    Under the law, abandoning an animal resulting in serious injury, sickness or death is a Class 4 felony, carrying a maximum sentence of five years in prison.

    Email  del.icio.us   Google   Yahoo  digg
    More Stories
    Intersection Plan Raises Questions

    Multi-Vehicle Crash Investigated

    Abuse Investigation Expands

    Fifth Suspect Named in ID Theft Case

    Convicted Rapist Sentenced

    Students Coping With Classmate's Death

    Athlete's Death Raises Questions

    Deadly Crash

    Post Your Comments
    First Name:
    Location:
    Enter Comments: characters left
    Email (optional):
    Email will not be displayed on site. For station contact purpose only.
    Read Comments
    Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
    Posted by: Lori Location: omaha on May 8, 2008 at 11:38 AM
    Keith, I work in a hospital and while you are correct that a DNR means no heroic measures to alter the course of a life-threatening event (cardiac arrest, respiratory distress, etc), there is a separate order to withdraw care and provide "comfort measures" only. In this instance, mechanical ventilation is generally withdrawn from a patient on the vent and painkillers and anti-anxiety meds are pushed. It requires an ethics consult with the Chief of Medicine in addition to the general consultation with the family and the initial code status report. In this instance, taking the patient off of the vent induces the life-threatening event (respiratory failure). Which I would consider euthanasia. Perhaps some do not. Either way, the end result is the same.

    Posted by: Patrick Location: Omaha on May 8, 2008 at 08:56 AM
    Lori, unfortunately you’ve mischaracterized what Keith and I wrote. I specifically wrote about euthanization, but you compared my feelings to DNRs. Yet, let me give you some perspective on DNRs, since you obviously don’t have firsthand experience with their execution. Although pain killers may be available, the majority choice being morphine, doctors fear lawsuits for giving “too much” morphine. Higher doses of morphine will speed up death. So, your loved one might still be in pain, but your doctor won’t allow more pain killer. If he does give more, you or another family member could sue him for euthanizing (causing premature death) your relative. So, many DNRs still die in great pain. Death isn’t as cut-an-dried rosy as you make it out to be.

    Posted by: Keith Location: Papillion on May 8, 2008 at 01:02 AM
    Lori - Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) situations are completely different from euthanasia, although I can see why you would errantly lump the two together. A DNR allows a person to die (rather than be saved) during a natural life threatening event, while euthanasia requires inducing a life threatening event on a person who would otherwise continue living. That is, a DNR allows death, while euthanasia causes death. The situations I mentioned DID NOT involve morphine, ativan, or any type of pain killer. For example, had I killed my son (with the blessing of doctors and the courts), he WOULD NOT have received pain killers. He would have died in agony, as thousands of children already have, because to give pain killers is an admission of action to kill. Don't blame me for that logic. Blame the courts and doctors who care more about appearances than suffering. With euthanasia, we have more concern for the pain and suffering of dogs than of humans. I hope this clears up your confusion.

    Posted by: Lynn Location: Omaha on May 7, 2008 at 08:31 PM
    I have personally witnessed a boy at the zoo throwing rocks at the peacocks. It was extremely sad to hear the parents laughing and urging the boy on, saying things such "there is another one, go get him". I went up to the boy and calmly told him to stop throwing things at the birds, however he continued. I then became a little concerned for own safety knowing that the parents probably weren't too happy that I disciplined their child. I eventually went into the ice cream area and told the workers there, hopefully they had him stop. It's good to read that others would do the same thing I did. Let's pray that poor little dog is in a better place now than with that man. Thankfully, this country is finally taking animal cruelty more seriously.

    Posted by: Lori Location: omaha on May 7, 2008 at 03:10 PM
    Actually if you have a "living will" specifying what you DON'T want in terms of life-saving measures. There are any number of things that constitute a "DNR" order (do not rescusitate). While Keith and Patrick think these are inhumane, I can assure you that anyone refusing heroic measures to die with dignity have plenty of morphine and ativan at the ready, for pain and anxiety relief. The dog in this story had no such relief, it literally knew what was going on from the first day in the subzero temps to the day it died. Let's not let a story on animal cruelty turn into a debate on the right-to-die with dignity argument. I have advanced directives, so does my husband, and so do our parents. I'm not living out my days on machines just because some bleeding heart thinks it would be inhumane to let me go.

    Posted by: NIECY Location: OMAHA on May 7, 2008 at 12:24 PM
    TO STACI FROM B TOWN, YOU DON T KNOW KEION SHELTON I DO HE A GOOD PERSON LOVING TO HIS FAMILY. SOMETHING WENT WRONG WHO ARE YOU TO PREJUDGE STACI FROM B TOWN. YOU ARE NOT GOD.

    Posted by: MARIE Location: OMAHA on May 7, 2008 at 12:20 PM
    WHO ARE WE TO PREJUDGE AND TO JUDGE WHERE ARE OUR PRIOITIES CHILD KILLERS AND MOLESTORS WALK THE STREETS FREELY MURDERS REPEAT OFFRENDERS. I KNOWN KEION FOR YEARS I MYSELF WANT TO KNOW WHAT HAPPEN. CHECK YOURSELVES OMAHA NEBRASKA WE ARE NOT GOD!

    Posted by: Sylvia Location: Omaha on May 7, 2008 at 10:39 AM
    To Denise: I do have my priorities. I despise the molesters and murderers, too. That doesn't mean that animal cruelty should be tolerated - studies have shown that people who are mean to animals progress on to being mean to people.

    Posted by: Patrick Location: Omaha on May 6, 2008 at 03:43 PM
    Keith, you're right. A lot of people are screaming "it's not just a dog" or "it's not just an animal," but why are we so humane when euthanizing animals and so inhumane when euthanizing humans? We use methods to euthanize humans that wouldn't pass the Supreme Court for use as the death penalty (e.g. starvation, dehydration, suffocation, untreated infection or pneumonia). Something's wrong here. Something's *radically* wrong here.

    Posted by: Keith Location: Papillion on May 6, 2008 at 12:48 PM
    I was given the opportunity to starve my son to death, after he was born with a severe handicap. Thousands of parents have already done it. And Terri Schiavo's husband starved her to death, while she was in a coma, so he could remarry. These people are called "brave" and "heroes", but don't get caught starving a dog! When done to an animal, it's called "inhumane" or "torture". And "To Beckie" has the gall to say of the dog, "This too is a human life!" It gives new meaning to our society "going to the dogs"!

    Posted by: Laura Location: omaha on May 6, 2008 at 10:54 AM
    Barbara, Dr Simmons should have banned that family from the zoo for life. You can bet if I had seen a kid throwing something at an animal in the zoo I would have said something as well. And we all know the mother would have screamed at me for chastising her "precious baby." I'm so sick of holier-than-thou parents who think their "darlings" can do no wrong. People who say "it's just an animal" have no heart or compassion. Jeffrey Dahmer started out torturing and killing squirrels, birds, and stray cats and dogs in his neighborhood. It scares me to potentially meet such an unfeeling person on the street.

    Posted by: w Location: midtown on May 6, 2008 at 10:39 AM
    To beckie or y, make up you mind how you spell your name, the unsolved murders were possibly performed by people that tortured an animal. This is why it is important to stop this while the person is just starting. And for your statment that everyone has tortured and animal-that is just sad if you realy thing that. It sounds llike your are just covering you own acts of animal abuse. When do you plan to start abusing people?

    Posted by: Liam Location: Omaha on May 6, 2008 at 09:20 AM
    Beckie and/or Becky: (hopefully not the same person unable to spell her name the same way twice...) You are aware that one of the primary indicators of a potential for violence is how someone treats an animal, right? If the person enjoys intimidating and harming animals, the transferrence to humans is only one bad situation away. You are aware that aside from owning copies of 'Catcher in the Rye' that one of the common factors among serial killers is starting out by killing and torturing animals...? Yes, it is 'just a dog' to you -- how about letting this guy watch your kids for a week? After all, dogs and people are different, right? And as for everyone torturing animals: WOW! You need to get to a headshrink pronto! My personal thanks to everyone who understands what a horrific crime this is, and is vocal enough to have helped make this a felony that may actually be enforced. I can only hope the judges and prosecutors don't label this as a 'light' felony, like they do with DUI.

    Posted by: JJ Location: OMAHA on May 6, 2008 at 09:13 AM
    HOW ABOUT SOME JAIL TIME AND FINE ,6MONTH OF COMMUNITY SERVICE AT THE ANIMAL SHELTER.AND NOT ALOUD TO HAVE ANYMORE PETS?

    Posted by: cory on May 6, 2008 at 08:16 AM
    people like this are often people abusers too so when someone says it isn't a big deal had better look at some of the serial killers we've had. abusing animals is a sign that there is something not right with a person and a clue to how they treat people.

    Posted by: Innocent first Location: Omaha on May 6, 2008 at 07:50 AM
    Your all so smart. He's not even convicted yet. This is America!

    Posted by: Staci Location: B-town on May 6, 2008 at 07:14 AM
    Abuse of animals most always leads to abuse of humans. It makes me sick to my stomach when humans treat a animal in this way. I don't care what breed of dog it was, it didn't deserve to die. Hope he gets the maxium.

    Posted by: Tom Location: Omaha on May 6, 2008 at 07:05 AM
    I hope this guy gets his just reward for the cruelty he placed on the animal he starved to death. I've got a neighbor that's just about like this guy, I've called the humane society about it at least 6 times and they still haven't done anything about taking the dog away from them. A neighbor and myself have feed and watered the dog more than several times cause it was hungry or needed water. I've just about given up hope on the Nebraska Humane Society

    Posted by: DENISE Location: OMAHA on May 6, 2008 at 07:01 AM
    I KNOW KEION SHELTON FOR YEARS HIS A DISTANT RELATIVE, HIS IS NOT THIS MONSTER THAT HE IS PORTRAY TO BE. WHO ARE WE TO JUDGE! WE NOT GOD, WHAT ABOUT THE CHILD MOLESTER AND MURDERS INNOCENT PEOPLE DYING FROM THE HAND OF A GANG MEMBER. CHECK YOUR PRIOITIES OMAHA.

    Posted by: Jackie Location: N. Omaha on May 6, 2008 at 06:57 AM
    What a loser! His sentenced should be to time him to a utility pole, stripped necked without any food or water. His jurors (which in this case would be pitbulls) should sentence him for his heinous crime!

    Posted by: Here Location: Look Around on May 6, 2008 at 06:43 AM
    How on gods green earth could someone abuse a defenseless animal. If nothing else he could of turned the dog loose and hopefully the dog could of had a chance. This idiot should be subject to the same cruelty that the dog had done to him. If he forgot about the dog to me that implies he was using drugs/drinking or simply just doesn't care. I wish there was an island that we could put every abuser, criminal and etc on and let them kill each other off. Let them find food and water. Leave them on the island to rot. And no way to escape the island. I hope you burn in h!!. May your soul be tortured. I could never do that. As a mother of a German Shepard, Pitbull, and Lab/Great Dane mix. And a grandmother of a Akita, Cane Corso, and Pitbull.

    Posted by: pete Location: omaha on May 6, 2008 at 06:39 AM
    I puzzles me that they will send a animal abuser to prison and all the drunken murders get off free after killing someone in with car.

    Posted by: Brad Location: Omaha on May 6, 2008 at 01:36 AM
    Why didn't he just give up the dog to someone who could care for it ? To all of you who don't think about your animals- they are live beings and need care. They feel pain and neglect and can't help themselves the way we humans can. The Humane Society does a wonderful job and there are many rescue programs out there that do also. If you don't have time for the animal, it is OK only if you do the right thing- give it to someone who can care. That means that YOU care. My only fear for the defendant is that he may treat a spouse, a child of another animal like this. As a man, he needs to understand that his responsibility in society is to care for those who cannot...animal or human. Men and women everywhere- please turn the pet in to the Humane Society or post it on Craigslist if you can't care for it. They depend on us. Lets set a good example. Let's also remember that even our enemies are live beings who deserve love and attention. Say something good to someone today...all of you...

    Posted by: Barbara Location: Omaha on May 5, 2008 at 11:00 PM
    Cruelty to animals takes many forms. A number of years ago, the Director of the Omaha Doorley Zoo, Dr. Simmons, stopped a kid from throwing dirt clods at an animal to make it move. The mother was incensed that he had the temerity to stop her son from doing that, and threatened to sue Dr. Simmons. She was laughed out of the situation by newspaper articles, etc. I have wondered how that kid has grown up, with a mother who approved of his harassing and hurting a zoo animal. I hope she and the boy learned something, but you never know about people like this.

    Posted by: Ed Location: Omaha on May 5, 2008 at 10:31 PM
    Cruelty to animals is almost as despicable as cruelty to any vulnerable person. It's hard to think of anyone that dim as to "forget" an animal.I hope the court is able to make a huge statement to him. This is probably just the tip of the iceberg around this city, given the gangs and felons and thugs around town. There must be a ring in Dante's Hell where they end up some day.

    Posted by: Michelle Location: Omaha on May 5, 2008 at 10:03 PM
    To Beckie: Would you like to have this man responsible for taking care of you? If you are hungry, thirsty or cold you can take care of it, but this poor animal depended on his owner to take care of him. He should be subject to the same treatment that he gave to his dog, be fined the maxium allowed and then be given the entire 5 years in prison without the possibility of parole. In addition, he should never be allowed to have another pet for the rest of his miserable life. The thought of what this poor animal went through just makes me ill. I hope that he never has a family that has to depend on him.

    Posted by: becky Location: west omaha on May 5, 2008 at 09:36 PM
    wow its just a dog who cares. i bet all you guys talking have at one point toture an animal.

    Posted by: TA Location: Iowa on May 5, 2008 at 08:09 PM
    Its too bad that something depended on this guy to take care of it and this guy failed miserably. Hopefully he never has kids.....

    Posted by: To Beckie Location: Omaha on May 5, 2008 at 07:32 PM
    'Beckie', this too is a human life!!! These innocent animals that are treated like this are just like babies. They totally depend and put their trust in human beings. If he didn't want the dog, he should of surrendered it to a shelter. This is just a shame that a dog had to go through this pain and suffering. So next time 'Beckie' when it's a freezing cold outside, lets tie you to a tree without food, water, or shelter and see how long you make it on your own!!

    Posted by: Lynn on May 5, 2008 at 07:20 PM
    It's good to read about people caring about the humanity of animals. As many studies indicate, most killers/rapists start off by initially abusing animals...

    Posted by: annonymous Location: omaha on May 5, 2008 at 06:48 PM
    Wow...yes cruelty to an animal is despicable, but you people are worse!!! You all want him to freeze to death, be beaten w/ a bat or burn in hell...your idea of punishments really reflect who you are as people. Now who is more inhumane???

    Posted by: Shirley Location: Bellevue on May 5, 2008 at 06:24 PM
    Beckie: It is a big deal to torture innocent animals. Your cold attitude says a lot about the kind of person you are.

    Posted by: g Location: fre on May 5, 2008 at 05:25 PM
    Hey Beckie why would you think that cruelity to an animal is not worth talking about. And what big deal are you talking about. I think you should spend a week out in the freezen cold with no food or water or shelter and see if you wouldn't think it was worth mentioning. Good job wowt.

    Posted by: Gina Location: Omaha on May 5, 2008 at 05:16 PM
    This man should be left without food or water for a week. And those that think that $10,000.00 is too much of a reward should remember that someone needs to speak for the dogs and unfortunately money might help some people do that. Also, please stop showing the footage and the still pictures of the dogs fighting! I have 2 small children and that is not something I want them to see.

    Posted by: To Beckie Location: Nebraska on May 5, 2008 at 04:54 PM
    It's sad Becky, but do you honestly believe that the city needs to spend every waking moment on just those murders alone (10 is a low number by the way). Maybe it's a good thing to see someone capable of being so cruel to a helpless creature get a piece of what he deserves. Maybe that proves that there is some good left in this world to overtake the bad. You can dwell in those murders all you want, I on the other hand like to see good prevail atleast once in a while.

    Posted by: Beckie Location: west o on May 5, 2008 at 04:30 PM
    Wow thats great there making a big deal about this when there still over 10 unsolved murders good job wowt

    Posted by: Karin Location: nwomaha on May 5, 2008 at 04:26 PM
    What in the world is wrong with people? Everyday I read something so inhumane and can't believe how many monsters are out there

    Posted by: kathy Location: omaha on May 5, 2008 at 04:20 PM
    I think that they should tie the dog's owner to the pole and let him starve and freeze to death for his punishment jail time is too good for him

    Posted by: cece Location: Omaha on May 5, 2008 at 04:18 PM
    I am typically a non violent person but I say give him the 5 years in prison and give me a baseball bat. I just want one good wack! This idiot shouldn't ever be able to have another animal and we should sterilize him while we are at it so he is unable to reproduce.

    Posted by: Shirley Location: Bellevue on May 5, 2008 at 04:18 PM
    Let him starve, freeze or burn in hell.

    Posted by: Animal Lover on May 5, 2008 at 04:17 PM
    While I hope he gets the max, it just seems sad that you can get more time for abusing an animal then a child.

    Posted by: Lulu Location: Omaha on May 5, 2008 at 04:12 PM
    Please throw the book at this guy - make him spend a week outside without food or water!!!!

    Posted by: Jo Location: Omaha on May 5, 2008 at 03:52 PM
    Never mind prison, sentence him to at least a week in a freezer with nothing to eat or drink.

    Posted by: Steve Location: Omaha on May 5, 2008 at 03:51 PM
    Another intelligent Pit Bull owner. I'm sure this dog was well taken care of before this happened. He looks like a very sensitive dog owner.

    Posted by: JD Location: Omaha on May 5, 2008 at 03:51 PM
    I hope he gets the maximum sentance. How could anyone be so cruel. No excuse for abuse

    Media Partners