WOWT.com on Demand
  • 6 On Your Cell
  • RSS Feeds
  • Desktop Alert
  • Text Alerts
  • Daily E-News
  • What’s on 6
  • Children's Programming Changes
    YouCast - Submit Pics and Video
    Watch NBC Shows Online
    6 News Features
    On Your Side
    Don't miss the latest On Your Side segments.
    McKnight Investigates
    Catch all of McKnight Investigates here.
    Heartland's Most Wanted
    Catch all of Heartland's Most Wanted here.
    Product Recalls
    Check for threats that might be in your home.
    Family Health
    Don't miss the latest from Family Health.
    MarketPlace
  • Restaurants
  • Go Green!
  • Auto Map
  • Business Connections
  • Financial Advice
  • Legal Advice
  • New Home Listings
  • Your Home, Your Investment
  • Entertainment
  • Recipes
  • Jobs
  • The Wedding Planner
  • Martha's Tip of the Day
  • Advertise With WOWT
  • Pardons Board Turns Down Parole For Erving Save Email Print
    Inmate has served 43 years for a murder he didn't commit
    Posted: 10:20 PM Feb 12, 2008
    Last Updated: 2:25 AM Feb 14, 2008
    Email Address: sixonline@wowt.com

    A | A | A

    The Nebraska Pardon's Board Wednesday denied a request for a hearing to consider commuting the sentence of an inmate who has served 43 years for a murder he didn't commit.

    Evelyn Erving took her husband's case to the state capitol. "He's ready to come home, he's just been there so long." She doesn't want her husband's life sentence to turn into a death sentence. “He's 67 years old. He was 24 at that time. I'm asking for a hearing so we can get this thing started."

    “Everyone needs a second chance and I have seen people get a second chance."

    Jerry Erving entered prison in 1965 for his role in a 1964 robbery. He sat drinking at a bar when a friend pulled out a gun and shot the bartender during a robbery. Erving grabbed three whiskey bottles and left in the getaway car.

    Larry Hall pulled the trigger. He told Channel 6 News that he planned the crime all by himself. “He was just there with me. I was the shooter, but he's still there."

    Even though Hall pulled the trigger and was sentenced to life, he was paroled more than 20 years ago. “I don't feel good about that or what happened. I don't feel good about that either." The scene of the crime no longer exists, it's now an empty lot.

    After Erving's conviction of first-degree murder, Evelyn asked for a divorce. “I was young, I was 18, there was no place to turn. I was devastated, I didn't know what to think. I was angry, I was hurt."

    Time changed everything in the relationship between Evelyn and Jerry. They reconnected and remarried two years ago. “He's changed and I love him. He's back to being the person that I knew, he's back to being that person."

    “If I plead guilty they would get cut loose for a lesser charge,” says Hall.

    "From the heart does it seem right for him to still be there and other people are free," says Evelyn.

    Erving had to persuade the governor, secretary of state and state attorney general who make up the pardon's board. The state used to commute life sentences for good behavior, but stopped in the early 90s.

    “The shooter happened in a fortunate moment in history and that doesn't mean we're gonna square everything in history for the shooter,” says board member Jon Bruning. “He walked through a door that surprisingly opened."

    Board members say even though Erving's case could draw sympathy, a hearing would bring false hope because a man convicted of a such a felony shouldn't go free.

    “This person chose to be part in a cold-hearted murder that took someone's life who would otherwise be living the kind of life that you talk about and want for Mr. Erving," says board member John Gale.

    So the board won't hear from prison supervisors about Erving's good record or see the trial transcript where the judge informed the jury that a life sentence could be commuted in the future.

    “There's a broken system in Nebraska with the governor, attorney general and the secretary of state,” says Evelyn. “They are not even looking at the cases, they're not even considering to commute a sentence."

    Evelyn says she's going to keep coming back to the board. Scott Polski, the attorney who took on the case for free, says he's going to try other legal options, including potential litigation against the board.

    “This case was one to me that I just couldn't rationalize professionally or any other way,” says Polski. “How you could continue to hold this guy accountable?"

    This was the third time Polski asked the state to commute Erving's sentence. “The simple fact is he didn't kill anyone, it was bad place, bad time to be somewhere."

    Erving has actually been out of prison. When rules were less strict, he attended community college and would leave on furloughs. That's no longer possible.

    His father was given a life sentence for shooting a man and was released from prison in the 1980s.

    More Stories
    Bold Move by Federal Reserve

    Paypal Layoffs

    Two More Left Under Safe Haven

    Short Cut Cut Off

    Water Main Break Closes School

    Nader Coming to Omaha

    Campus Warnings On Facebook?

    Help For Iowa Homeowners

    Post Your Comments
    First Name:
    Location:
    Enter Comments: characters left
    Email (optional):
    Email will not be displayed on site. For station contact purpose only.
    Read Comments
    Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
    Posted by: Saddened on Apr 23, 2008 at 04:41 PM
    The State of Nebraska is one of the most racist states to live in. Stuff of this nature happens ALL the time. White people in Nebraska are behind the times when it comes to racial harmony. They are ignorant farmers who could care less about black people. I was raised there as a black person and find myself ashamed to admit that. Lincoln is horrible for racist crimes and nothing's being done about it.

    Posted by: JQPublic on Feb 18, 2008 at 05:32 AM
    Where is Ernie Chambers when you need him? This is actually something that appears on the outside to be racially motivated due to the time of the crime/sentence. I challenge him to look at this and see if he can help.

    Posted by: Steve on Feb 15, 2008 at 11:28 AM
    Do a crime, pay the time...3 whiskey bottles or not. He was involved so let him rot. He obviously didn't learn his lesson...but let me guess. While in prison, he found Jesus. GIVE ME A BREAK!

    Posted by: Doug on Feb 14, 2008 at 10:46 PM
    People, people, people...Come on how could you expect a group of Republicans to let this guy go after forty-three years in prison for just being involved and not actually doing the shooting. I am sure there is a national security potential here. Well, if not, they will turn it into one. Have to follow the Republican Party talking points. They are protecting you from this guy. But if you drive drunk and kill a police officer, you get a slap on the wrist. If you drive drunk nine or ten times in Bellevue, you get another chance. Oh, by the way, this is not a race issue. It is a, "I want to be elected to office again," issue. What this guy did was wrong, but he has paid his dues to society. I wonder how serious you all are about voting out these idiots. Guess we will see.

    Posted by: R U Kidding on Feb 14, 2008 at 10:35 PM
    I would like to organize some mass gatherings to draw attention to this travesty. We need to pack the hearing room at the capitol the next time this matteris heard, We need to distribute fliers, send emails and do whatever it takes to get this guy home. If you REALLY want to help, contact me at freedom4jerry@yahoo.com, so we can put our heads together to raise the consciousness of this state about this case. Believe me, if we let this happen to Jerry, this could happen to anyone.

    Posted by: Brian on Feb 14, 2008 at 09:28 PM
    I don't think that we should turn this into an issue of being a racist issue before we know all of the facts of this case. Come on News people do some investative reporting and find out all of the details from the original case against this man. Start knocking on doors and find out why this man is getting denied a parole hearing. What are the facts to this case, If this does turn out to be a racist issue. Then we need to see about removing these people from office and getting officials who are going to be non-biased in the decisions. We elect these people to represent the well-being of the populus and so far I am not seeing anything more then a group of people who don't want to be bothered because they may miss their tee time at the local golfing site. From what I have read on this there has been some injustices here and I am ashamed to think that we elected these people.

    Posted by: BB on Feb 14, 2008 at 08:06 PM
    We should all write to the govenor to complain on this mans behalf. The website to Heineman is www.gov.state.ne.us and click on contact us. This will give you a way to send an email to the govenor. If he gets enough of them he will be forced to deal with it. Otherwise I agree we should remember this when it comes time to vote.

    Posted by: The Original Cop on Feb 14, 2008 at 07:37 PM
    Brooke- I completely agree that this guy should have been out of jail long before the guy that pulled the trigger, but how do you make this a race issue? Unless you tell me the guy that pulled the trigger was white then what the hell does race have to do with this?

    Posted by: y on Feb 14, 2008 at 06:04 PM
    These people making these decisions are not human, where is the mercy and compassion the Bible talks about? What is the matter with this system that it is so cold and ruthless, this man has paid his dues, let him out, eveyone should write to the governor and whoever else is involved in the travesty, they can't ignore us all. I have a problem paying taxes for something like this, enough is enough.

    Posted by: Bill on Feb 14, 2008 at 04:49 PM
    This is very sad. I think it is about time that this man be released back to society! He was an accomplice to a terrible crime and has done his time. Do not make this a matter of race. Do the right thing, grant him a hearing and you will be forced to set the man free!

    Posted by: Tim on Feb 14, 2008 at 03:03 PM
    I do alot of sponser work in the prison system and yes I think it is broken and I also think reform is impossible do to the fact that reform could cost some their nice cushy state employment.

    Posted by: Gina on Feb 14, 2008 at 02:44 PM
    What a sad state we live in when our Goverment would NOT even give this man an opportunity to have a hearing. Shame on you all. We need to stand up as a "community" to save what little time this man has on this earth and prevent this from happening to another person! Shame on you General Bruning - may you sleep well tonight!

    Posted by: Jay on Feb 14, 2008 at 02:10 PM
    This just proves what I have always thought. Any idiot can be elected to a political office. Obiviously, common sense was not used here. The gentleman has done his time for the part he played (which seems to be stealing several bottles of whisky and leaving with the gunman, who has been released. We need to vote these types out of office and restore common sense to our state leaders, or we'll end up on some AP news report titled "Look how stupid Nebraska is"!

    Posted by: Todd on Feb 14, 2008 at 01:27 PM
    There is something wrong when the Attorney General and Governor are on the board. This politicizes the decision. They could deny him any recource because there is no political advantage for them to do so, or because there is a political disadvantage to doing so. This setup is very wrong. Regular people should be on this board so that a fair decision is reached.

    Posted by: Mother of Two on Feb 14, 2008 at 01:10 PM
    Are you kidding me? What kind of power trip are these guys on? Let him out!! Everyone needs to remember this when it comes time to vote. I am ashamed to be a republican in Nebraksa right now... Shame on you guys.

    Posted by: C on Feb 14, 2008 at 01:00 PM
    Yesterday, when I posted, I left room for some doubt that he was worthy of being paroled. As in, what has his prison record been like? That has been answered when they said "...Erving's good record..." Another thing that is screwy about this is the fact that his father shot a man but was released from prison in the '80s. After receiving a life sentence. Ironic, isn't it? Younger Mr. Erving does NOT shoot anyone, gets a life sentence and cannot get a hearing to even consider comuting his sentence. But...the guy who DID do the shooting is now out. AND, Mr. Erving's own father who shot someone is also out. Until I saw that Mr. Erving had a good record while in prison, I was skeptical. But now? I think our system really needs an overhaul (or, maybe the people running it?).

    Posted by: Brooke on Feb 14, 2008 at 12:42 PM
    In my opinion, this is a race issue, and it's obvious there are racist people on the board. This is ridiculous, and makes you ashamed to even have this sort of thing happen in our state. Give the man something to look forward to before he passes away. This is very sad he had all those years taken from him, for something like this.

    Posted by: a on Feb 14, 2008 at 12:31 PM
    I cannot believe that the Dept of Corrections kept this man in prison!! He stole whiskey, left with the shooter and he is still in prison??!! I agree he should have served SOME time, but for God's sake the MURDERER IS OUT!! Someone needs to intervene for this man and his family. The is no logical, or legal, reason he should have served this long. I hope Brunning can see that this is an injustice and do something. He is always looking for press time, now would be a good time!

    Posted by: Stunned* on Feb 14, 2008 at 12:02 PM
    This is terrible. They should let him go. Nobody deserves that. His life was wasted because of an unfair and UNJUST system. Simply unorthodox.

    Posted by: Michael on Feb 14, 2008 at 11:54 AM
    I will use my voice by voting against all parties responsible for keeping the man in prison.

    Posted by: Delancey on Feb 14, 2008 at 11:01 AM
    This is not justice! Mr. Erving was not the shooter, and did not plan the crime. For the shooter to be paroled and Mr. Erving to be serving a life sentence is wrong. More evidence of justice being arbitrary!

    Posted by: G on Feb 14, 2008 at 10:42 AM
    Okay the facts are his friend shot and killed someone and he was let out 20years ago while this man who was there just drinking and stole some wiskey has to die in Jail. Now Omaha no Nebraska does that make any sense to me. It is totally backwards!! What is the problem!! This other man who was the killer has been free for the last 20 years!!!! I am really not liking this state b/c the as bass ackwords. Let this man go please!

    Posted by: Jen on Feb 14, 2008 at 10:40 AM
    This man never killed anyone. What is wrong with this picture. Others who actually take another person's life do less time than he has already done!

    Posted by: Linda on Feb 14, 2008 at 10:04 AM
    What is not being told here? He was convicted as an accessory to the crime. Why did the actual shooter get paroled 20 years ago?

    Posted by: Amy on Feb 14, 2008 at 10:00 AM
    This states legal system is all screwed up. The fact that this man is still in jail and the man who actually committed the murder has been out for 20 years is a shame and very sad. Its another life wasted. I am a firm believer that if you commit a crime with somebody and that it results in someones death that you should also be as responsible as the shooter, but in this case where the shooter was released early, he should have been released at the same time. This state is so far behind when it comes to the law. We are the last state to have a safe haven law. The current laws on the books need to be looked at and adjusted as needed. If he would have killed someone drunk driving then he would have only gotten a couple years in jail if that. He he would have molested a child he would have been out in a few years free to do it again and again. This man does not need to be in prison anymore. If the shooter was still in jail then he should stay in jail, but he's not and its not fair.

    Posted by: hmd on Feb 14, 2008 at 09:57 AM
    its time that we see why the parole board denied him~~ there are always tow sides of the story! however he has done a lot oftime for just stealing a couple of bottles and the actual killer is out of jail~~ whats wrong with this picture !!??

    Posted by: S on Feb 14, 2008 at 09:49 AM
    These "consideration" hearings are subject to the open meetings rules, so the public may attend. We need to get more people to these hearings to show the board members that they are NOT representing the people of Nebraska. Anyone may be heard. What if these guys had to sit there and listen to their constituents for hours. Maybe having to stay at the office until late at night hearing the disapproval of the citizens of this state, and not being able to go home when thay want to would give them some much needed empathy.

    Posted by: Coffey on Feb 14, 2008 at 08:58 AM
    Why does Atty Gen Bruning always see the law as black and white. The law is made up and designed to protect the people who are all shades of color, not just black and white. The law can't be black and white. Can anyone tell me what Bruning's very "eloquent" reason was all about? He keeps mentioning the shooter, but this is not about the shooter, the shooter is free.

    Posted by: SB on Feb 14, 2008 at 08:57 AM
    The only way that things change is that a mass number of people get involved.Take the time you use to post and write letters to the people that make up the board Tell them that you feel this is unjust and you support giving him a second chance. Elections coming up Polotics plays a big part in this also. If they are flooded with letters they will know that people are watching and there are some that care about this man.

    Posted by: K on Feb 14, 2008 at 08:57 AM
    This case proves what a joke the legal system is today on both sides. We let those who kill people out, but keep those whose guilt was being unfortunate enough to have a person with them that commited murder. Fine he did something wrong, but I dont know about you but the excuses coming from the board are just pathetic excuses to justify stupidity... the murderer is out!!!!! HELLOOOO It's way past time in this country for us as citizens to stop complaining about the justice system and do something about it. We sit in our homes and complain about the unfairness of cases like this but how many of you do anything to change it. I hope the board doesnt dig thier feet in and refuse to budge on this case to save face which happens all the time. To those of you on the hearing board... get a clue.. i would almost say at this point it would be called cruel and unusual punishment!!! For godness sake he's 67 years old!!!!! he does not deserve to die in prison for this.

    Posted by: Lisa on Feb 14, 2008 at 08:53 AM
    How can u keep an innocent man in prison for so long, but the accused murderer is now free. Doesnt make sense. Maybe the shooter should still be in there and Erving should go free. He served more than a life sentence for the crime a crime he didnt even commit. Maybe if the system was as strict now as it was back then it wouldnt be so much crime and so many 1st 2nd 3rd and 4th offenders out here such as rappist and child molesters. I mean u can give someone probation for a DUI and killing someone under the influence, u can give a child molester 3-5 yrs for taking a child innocence, but you cant free a man that did not commit a crime? And for John Gale, who are u to judge, and have the say so over someones life? YOU ARE NOT GOD! I am starting to wonder was the bartender a white women and is Erving just being held as a victim of racism??????????

    Posted by: T on Feb 14, 2008 at 08:35 AM
    Once again, zero common sense, a trait that seems to be quite prevelant in local, state and federal govt. It's ridiculous that this man is still in jail.

    Posted by: Karen on Feb 14, 2008 at 08:32 AM
    I have to wonder about this state sometimes. An embezzler gets more time than a drug dealear, a so called accomplis is still in jail while the real shooter has been out over 20 years? What gives? Why when the shooter's sentence was commuted wasn't this guy's?

    Posted by: BJ on Feb 14, 2008 at 08:07 AM
    This really ruffles my feathers. The trigger man got OUT over 20 years ago and this guy is still in. Murder is murder, and a life sentence is a life sentence. And who ever is responsible (i.e. parole board),for letting the trigger guy out needs to learn thier job better or better yet, be fired. Probably retired by now. Our judicial system makes no sense to me. No convicted murderer should ever be released. Or if they want out its actually quite simple, bring the victim back to life, back to society. Then they can return too.

    Posted by: Ernest on Feb 14, 2008 at 07:35 AM
    Just very silly!

    Posted by: D on Feb 14, 2008 at 06:17 AM
    I cannot believe they won't even give the guy a hearing. They didn't vote to deny him parole. They voted to deny him the chance for a hearing to argue for parole. He has been locked up for so long. If he has a good record in prison, there is no reason to not give this man a second chance!!

    Posted by: Anonymous on Feb 14, 2008 at 04:45 AM
    What? They will add years to your sentence for "associating with the wrong crowd"? Then entier population of the prison is "the wrong crowd". How do you avoid associating with them?

    Posted by: LeShawn on Feb 14, 2008 at 02:22 AM
    Wow! I think if we are going to make change in the White House, then we need to start right here in Nebraska. It doesn't look like some of you read the whole article. The following is the fourteenth paragraph: So the board won't hear from prison supervisors about Erving's good record or see the trial transcript where the judge informed the jury that a life sentence could be commuted in the future. This is truly unfair and it is time to get these politicians out of our state office ASAP

    Posted by: Lori on Feb 13, 2008 at 11:38 PM
    WOW according to this story, his record in the prison has been good, so no more years should have been added. They won't even give him a HEARING for this? Now that's just wrong. Especially since the guy who pulled the trigger is out on the streets.

    Posted by: Joe on Feb 13, 2008 at 11:16 PM
    Ok,Im confused here.You give a man life sentence for being there with the killer but you let the killer go and the innocent man still sits in prison and you know he didnt murder anyone?What is wrong with you people!Let this man go so he can live his life!youve ruined it already.I am so disgusted with this state.This man has wasted his life away for no reason and the killer walks free?How many other innocent people have been sitting in prison for no reason?He should not have spent that long in prison.

    Posted by: `Pat' on Feb 13, 2008 at 09:57 PM
    A very great travesty of `justice may already have been committed by those who have kept Jerry incarcerated all these many years. Is it too late to try & make amends on everyone's part? Better yet: Why, may I ask, did the Board which from what I understand is the Governor, Secretary of State, General Attorney & possibly others say "No" the last two times? I figure the kind of future Jerry would have outside prison walls helped determine that answer. Here's a question that definitely should be asked by the Board: What & how has Jerry been in prison? Now that would tell a story. Good luck, Jerry! Freedom in the US isn't all what its cracked up to be anymore. Not that these aren't the `good 'ole days now in some things. Life is great in 2008 in some ways, but in others, it's worse than can be imagined. If the Board ever says "Yes!"; may God fill your life with good, holy, wise & loving friends-> at least one, who will help you provide an income for yourself. You're going to need it. :-)

    Posted by: valerie on Feb 13, 2008 at 05:03 PM
    i cant belive the only thing keeping this man in jail was that he was sentanced life with out parole i think he has served his life sentance let him out

    Posted by: Anonymous on Feb 13, 2008 at 01:12 PM
    crazy stuff

    Posted by: C on Feb 13, 2008 at 12:56 PM
    Louis, I'm sure that 95% of the people in the pen are trying to tell someone that they didn't do what they were put in there for. However, most people have got it right in my opinion. Why is the accomplice still in jail and the shooter out? There has got to be some more to this story but if not, what a sorry state of affairs.

    Posted by: lori on Feb 13, 2008 at 12:23 PM
    We don't know what his conduct has been like inside the prison. They will add years onto a sentence if you are caught breaking the rules or associating with the wrong crowd. Notice he is not asking to be let out "on good behavior."

    Posted by: Tony on Feb 13, 2008 at 12:08 PM
    I am curious as to why he was denied parole on more than one occasion? There is typically a reason.

    Posted by: Kay on Feb 13, 2008 at 11:52 AM
    Let's let this guy out of jail and let's put the shooter back in jail. The punishment does not fit the crime here.

    Posted by: Anonymous on Feb 13, 2008 at 10:59 AM
    This does not make sense...the man should of been released years ago. Let him get his second chance in life. May God be there with him and his wife.

    Posted by: J on Feb 13, 2008 at 09:30 AM
    Petty theft? What was his real charge? Being an accomplice to murder 1? I'd give him life too. I doubt this guy is really as innocent as he is made out to be. I also don't think that the "real killer" should have been let out 20 something years ago. Put him back in jail, and keep this guy in there as well.

    Posted by: D on Feb 13, 2008 at 09:12 AM
    That's a long time to pay for a stupid mistake. Your behavior at the time leaves much to be desired, but I think you have served longer than most.

    Posted by: Anonymous on Feb 13, 2008 at 09:10 AM
    He has done his time for being at the wrong place wrong time and the killer is free but yet he remains in jail that is not right at all.

    Posted by: Lincoln Cop on Feb 13, 2008 at 08:55 AM
    Um, I may be just a dumb copper. Why is this guy still in prison when the real "bad guy" was released a long time ago? There is no excuse for his role in the crime but I think he has more than served his debt to society!

    Posted by: Michelle on Feb 13, 2008 at 08:54 AM
    I agree, where's the attention on this, Why was he not given parole one of the first two times he asked. I would like to see an update on this one!

    Posted by: jp on Feb 13, 2008 at 08:48 AM
    Its kind of ironic that the killer is free and his buddy is still in jail. waste of money and time. But the state does'nt care, the money comes out of joe public's wallet. There has got to be another reason why this guy is still locked up. Has he done something in prison that makes him a threat to society?

    Posted by: Jennifer on Feb 13, 2008 at 08:42 AM
    This is sad. Keep this man locked up years after he has paid his debt to society. No wonder people don't have faith in the system.

    Posted by: Louie on Feb 13, 2008 at 08:39 AM
    Did he ever try to tell someone he was in prison for something he did not do? I know I would be saying something to get me out of it ,if indeed I did not commit the crime. 44 years is a long time to do for something you had no part of. Maybe he should have left the booze behind and walked away.

    Posted by: me on Feb 13, 2008 at 07:58 AM
    OK with the according to your side of this it sounds like this guy should get out and maybe so. But what was his record like before he did this? How has he conducted himself in prison? Whats the other side of the story the meada dose not want us to see?

    Posted by: steve on Feb 13, 2008 at 07:33 AM
    this is ridiculous, the real killer was released 20 yrs ago and yet this man is still behind bars, let him go already he has served his time and then some so it is time our judicial system follows the same suit with all crimese this man should have been let go beofre the real killer, since this guy just was drinking there at the time and yes he got in the getaway car but he did not pull the trigger LET HIM GO

    Posted by: jess on Feb 13, 2008 at 06:15 AM
    okay correct me if im wrong but they both got a life sentance and one didnt kill anyone nor did he help with it he just left with the guy, and the shooter is out already, um okay a few things wrong with this one you guys have stated the shooter was let out but the other is still there. but what about the fact that the sentance was life, why give them the sentance and not follow thru? granted if this is all of the story, which i am sure its not, the man still there was over punished for one thing, make the punishment fit the crime, and second make them serve what they were given. would be like telling your child they will get grounded for something and then not following thru. right up there with our nonexhistant death penelty.

    Posted by: Brian on Feb 13, 2008 at 01:46 AM
    Ok let me see if I get this right. The man the shot and killed the guy was released on parolle. But the man who was at the bar drinking and made a bad choice of let see petty theft is still behind bars for the murder of a man he didn't commit. Is there more to this case or are the people on this board feeling guilty for letting the wrong guy out of prison. Call me silly but this seems a little backwards to me. I think this needs to have more media attention and find out why the govenor and the others are keeping this man behind bars when they are willing to let others who are more dangerous then this old man out on parole. Or is there more to this case then they are telling us, so that we feel sorry for this guy. Whats the full story here or what is going on with are judicial system when a situation can even happen, and how many other killers were released while others were kept in their place.

    Posted by: what? on Feb 13, 2008 at 12:12 AM
    This doesn't make sense, we are paying to keep this person in prison while the real killer was released years ago, wake up judicial system and stop wasting our money.

    Posted by: Gary on Feb 12, 2008 at 10:41 PM
    Why is this not getting more attention? The man didnt actually kill anyone why is he in jail and the shooter walks free? Talk about wrong place at the wrong time. Thanks Ch6 for bringing attention to this story to the public's attention.

    Media Partners