Home  ·   News  ·   Weather  ·   Sports  ·   Jobs  ·   Community  ·   Pics N Videos  ·   Station  ·   Marketplace  ·   6 on Your Side  ·   Contests  ·   Get Connected
Family Health · Health Check · Schools · Time Saver/Traffic · Gas Prices · Backpack Journalist · Mom to Mom · City Cams · School Closings · HS Cribs · McKnight Investigates · DTV
WOWT.com on Demand
6 On Your Cell
News, Sports & Weather
Information On Your Cell
Text ALERTS
Breaking News Alerts
Direct to Your Cell Phone
Daily e-News
News & Weather Updates
delivered via email
You Cast
Submit Your Pics
and Video
What's on 6
Your Guide to NBC
& WOWT Programming
6 News Features
On Your Side
Don't miss the latest On Your Side segments.
Family Health
Don't miss the latest from Family Health.
Product Recalls
Check for threats that might be in your home.
Heartland's Most Wanted
Catch all of Heartland's Most Wanted here.
McKnight Investigates
Catch all of McKnight Investigates here.
Schools to Squeeze Budget Save Email Print
Spike in expense unveiled

A | A | A

Nebraska might have to pay millions more to schools than expected, dimming what had been a bright financial outlook. The added expense also raises the specter of higher taxes or budget cuts over the next couple years.

Department of Education officials have notified lawmakers that state aid to schools will have to be about $39 million more than expected next fiscal year.

That sharply decreases the balance lawmakers expected to have on the state's budget ledger the end of next year.

Senator Lavon Heidemann of Elk Creek says the ongoing costs could have the biggest impact during the next budget cycle, increasing a projected shortfall by more than $140 million. That could prompt talk of raising taxes and cutting spending.

The governor's office rejects the notion that tax hikes or spending cuts will be required.

A spokesperson for Governor Heineman says the governor's message to lawmakers on the issue will be that the formula that has brought about this situation needs to be simplified and streamlined.

More Stories
Officer Takes Ford Documents

Thefts From Heartland Churches

More Jobs Lost in Nebraska

Funeral Arrangements Set for Former ISU Player

Free Security Cameras to Help Deter Crime

Search for Missing Man

UNL Students Building Edible Cars

Fire Victim's Mother Headed to Trial

Post Your Comments
First Name:
Location:
Enter Comments: characters left
Email (optional):
Email will not be displayed on site. For station contact purpose only.
Read Comments
Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
Posted by: Not Surprised on Dec 31, 2007 at 03:05 AM
Catholic School Parent - You obviously understand the fee for service concept, where you choose to spend your money for the best education for the dollar. It's easy to understand why you choose not to participate in the public school "No Child Left Behind" system, where good schools' budgets are cut and bad schools rake in more money. Where's the motivation for schools to do better? When schools can make more money by performing poorly, that's their incentive.

Posted by: Catholic School Parent on Dec 29, 2007 at 02:34 PM
Spending even more money for a smaller number of students, with dumbed down achievement tests to make the districts look better under No Child Left Behind. Just think what government would do running our health care.

Posted by: omahan on Dec 29, 2007 at 09:11 AM
well comon nebraskans, what did yalls expect? this is the tax-me state. homeowners is going to be taxed right out of their homes. people wont be able to get cars cause they cant afford the tax. hey while there at it, why dont we build a new baseball stadium. o yea-taxpayers will buy it no problem.

Posted by: Pete on Dec 28, 2007 at 11:43 PM
Gee ... look at the surprised look on my face !!! Maybe if they quit on spending money on usless stuff around town; like foot bridges..maybe they could have some money. It is still a joke..no wonder Iowa's population growth is 11% and nebraska is 1%.. People are leaving this out of control state.

Posted by: Dave on Dec 28, 2007 at 09:57 PM
How about this. We just stop taxing every homeowner roughly 50 percent of their property taxes for schools,and have each school say how much it costs to educate a kid at that school. Then if a parent/s want to send their kid to that school,thats how much it costs. Nowhere in the constitution does it say I owe other people kids an education.

Posted by: Brad on Dec 28, 2007 at 08:49 PM
spend/spend , Yet we have problems paying for books & we need more money! Give me a break. OPS is a big joke.

Posted by: DB on Dec 28, 2007 at 04:32 PM
How in the world can there be 39 million more needed. OPS needs to be evaluated and trimmed down. When will we make them be accountable? The OPS schoolboard is a joke!

Posted by: Keith on Dec 28, 2007 at 03:15 PM
Before we the public can make informed comments on this story, we need more information. Why do schools suddenly need $39 million more than expected? Which Department of Education notified our lawmakers--U.S. or Nebraska? And what roll does our $542 million reserve play in this issue? Would we really raise taxes to cover an unexpected expense in order to protect the reserve that should be used to cover unexpected expenses without raising taxes?

Posted by: Dan on Dec 28, 2007 at 02:49 PM
I say we demand that our legislators pass a law and a cap on what and how much a superintendent and principles make it should be 10,000.00 less then what the governor makes he/she is voted into office these people are not. At our school in Plattsmouth the superintendent makes 140,000.00 a year which is way too much and beyond what’s right. If they are too afraid of the teachers union then we tax payer should show them the door next time they run as these people forget its WE THE PEOPLE not them the school board and the teachers union. Taxes are getting out of control and its time to stop it dead in its tracks.

Media Partners