Home  ·   News  ·   Weather  ·   Sports  ·   Jobs  ·   Community  ·   Pics N Videos  ·   Station  ·   Marketplace  ·   6 on Your Side  ·   Contests  ·   Get Connected
Health Check · Lottery · DTV · Backpack Journalist · Mom to Mom · Traffic · The Omaha Buzz · CityCAMS · My Weather · School Closings · HS Cribs · Restaurants · McKnight Investigates
  • sixonline@wowt.com
  • Phone: (402) 233-7909
  • WOWT: 3501 Farnam St.
  • Omaha, NE. 68131
  • click here
    Dust Upsets Neighbors Save Email Print
    New school year increases the problem
    Posted: 8:43 PM Aug 25, 2008
    Last Updated: 11:53 PM Aug 25, 2008

    A | A | A

    You might think it would be difficult to keep a neighborhood clean when you have a dirt road in the mix but some homeowners say it really wasn't a problem until school started again.

    A dirty cloud hangs over the area of 16th and Jaynes twice a day. Students can get a taste of life in the dust bowl years but parent and homeowner Jeannie Lade is tired of living history.

    She says, "I'd like to have it paved but I know they're not going to do that."

    East of 16th, Jaynes street is a rocky road and twice a day parents drive it to drop off or pick up kids from Sherman Elementary. The street by the school is one way and that unpaved road is the best way to circle around.

    For safety, OPS officials say it's necessary to route parents one way past the school.

    Parent Tammy Bronston says, "They all have to come around this way and then there's a traffic jam and you can't get through this way."

    So parents and bus drivers have little choice but stir up neighbors in 11 homes along the unpaved street.

    Bob Coleman waters the street in front of his house.

    "I do this so we can breathe," he says.

    The city would pave the street if Bob and his neighbors, most of them retired, paid thousands of dollars toward the cost.

    Coleman says, "You don't do that on Social Security when you're making $800 a month. You just don't do that. So you got to live with it I guess."

    Homeowners say the dusty condition is caused by school traffic that goes by too fast or too many cars that come by at the same time. Add buses to the mix and there's a haze in the air every school day.

    Jeannie says, "We shouldn't have to live down here like that in a dust bowl. It's terrible."

    After a call from Six on Your Side, Omaha traffic engineers said they plan to inspect the street conditions to look for solutions. That could include spreading calcium chloride that knocks down dust.

    More Stories
    Parking Confusion Angers Holiday Shoppers

    Couple Falls For Loan Scam

    Omaha Victims Of Lending Scam

    Confusing Highway Still Taking Its Toll

    Ex-Enron Employees Told To Return Retirement Money

    Complaints Follow Contractor's Broken Promises

    Graffiti Vandals Caught On Camera

    Residents Raise A Stink Over Landfill

    Post Your Comments
    First Name:
    Location:
    Enter Comments: characters left
    Email (optional):
    Email will not be displayed on site. For station contact purpose only.
    Read Comments
    Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
    Posted by: llr on Aug 28, 2008 at 09:52 AM
    The point is, we COMPLAIN about the potholes, but NOTHING EVER GETS DONE.

    Posted by: Anonymous on Aug 27, 2008 at 08:36 PM
    Lived here over 20 years and pay our taxes with all the increases just like everyone else. If we lived in the country and paid country taxes, I would expect dirt roads. If they don't want to pave the road, then move the buses to the paved road. The city paid for those roads to be paved, have the buses use them. Lead is in excess in the dirt down here it warrants testing again. Maybe a call to the EPA is in order. And we do have dust AND potholes now. We don't complain about the potholes, after all we live in Omaha, the city of Potholes!

    Posted by: TO IIr on Aug 27, 2008 at 01:28 PM
    Didn't you hear? We aren't in the country anymore but are now referred to as a 'big city' (some call this PROGRESS). This is a dirt city road that needs to be a paved street. As far as them 'complaining' about potholes(aka 'exercising civic responsibility'), why should that neighborhood be any different than the rest of the city they belong to? Besides we already know that the city doesn't pay any heed to citizens who complain, unless WOWT gets involved, they simply don't care.

    Posted by: Mickey on Aug 27, 2008 at 01:19 PM
    Another prime example of this city putting the solution on the backs of the few who can least afford it. Home values plumment down over 15% but the fixed-to-moderate income families (who have been already taxed exhorbantly for NON-SERVICES rendered) are expected to correct an obvious planning foobar. And to add injury to insult, they are breathing in lead particulant contaminated dust (and putting down calcium cloride is not a solution, just a bandaid). Why isn't this street already paved? Why are the current weight restrictions not enforced? That dirt road was never intended to handle all that traffic and the neighbors shouldn't be put in harms way because the planners didn't perform simple due-diligence or just didn't care about the ramifications their plan entails.

    Posted by: llr on Aug 27, 2008 at 11:49 AM
    For crying out loud, you don't hear people who live in the country complaining. It's something you have to live with. Some counties do spread a thin film of oil on dirt and gravel roads to control dust. If they paved it, these same people will be complaining in a few years about the potholes.

    Posted by: Anonymous on Aug 26, 2008 at 08:11 PM
    I know this area, Facts are, up until this year dust has not been bad. Weight limit on street is 6 ton, buses surely weigh more than that, and the property values increase over 60% past two years. Neighbors are elderly and cannot afford to pave, both streets either side are paved.This area always forgotten by city, they need to stop the buses, reroute to Ogden and then down 14th or step up and pave. OPD needs to issue tickets to those who drive 40-50mph down the road when kids are walking. City does not even mow abandon lot so kids have to walk in the streets-sidewalks are grown over with weeds. Lots of options is someone who just take the time to listen to those who live in the area.

    Posted by: Randi Coffman on Aug 26, 2008 at 06:15 PM
    I have read the story about our dusty raods and it is the truth i think the scool should have to pave our road or make school traffic go down the next street over it has a paved road. this is nonsense i have two young kids and my three year old chokes every morning and every after noon.

    Posted by: Jennifer on Aug 26, 2008 at 04:21 PM
    Considering the levels of lead soil contamination in that area of the city (the EPA Superfund site), I sure hope someone calls to have that dirt road tested. If those schoolkids and residents are inhaling lead-contaminated road dust on a daily basis, that will definitely cause them some serious damage.

    Posted by: Bill on Aug 26, 2008 at 03:33 PM
    Sure, it there is a problem with the street; let the homeowner pay for the solution. Just because the city never originally paved the street doesn’t and shouldn’t mean that the city can’t pay to have the street paved. If the majority of traffic on the street is generated by the school then have the school pay for improvements; they are the ones causing the problem. I am sure that the local traffic generated by the 11 homes there doesn’t create the problem. Why should they have to pay to solve a problem they do not create. The residents pay taxes that go for street improvements in other areas of Omaha so why should they have to pay for street improvements in other areas of town and not see the benefits on their own street. IF the city can’t pony up for the improvements, close the street to through traffic and do not allow the school traffic to use it.

    Posted by: OmahaAnnie on Aug 26, 2008 at 02:09 PM
    Life is pretty good if all you have concern about is dust.

    Posted by: To Teresa on Aug 26, 2008 at 02:08 PM
    what! Elkhorn did not pave the roads for you, but now Omaha is the bad city because they won't either. My thoughts if you move into a house on a dirt road, then you should expect to live on a dirt road the entire time that you live there.

    Posted by: me on Aug 26, 2008 at 02:03 PM
    I think most people who call these TV stations just want their minute of fame. I live in that area and my car is dusty everyday of the year, summer or winter. It does not matter. so why are they complaining now?

    Posted by: RM on Aug 26, 2008 at 02:00 PM
    Every time the city does a major road reconstruction do they add an additional tax to the property owners aloung the route. They should not have to pay more just to get basic services. Are the property owners downtown close to the new ball park going to pay more because I'm sure some major road work will need to be done.

    Posted by: cece on Aug 26, 2008 at 01:07 PM
    Pave the road! I am usually non-bias when it comes to city gov. Most of the time I think they get a bad rap and nothing will ever be good enough for some. However, I don't understand why there are any roads in this city that are still not paved. I don't get making the home owners pay...I know I pay plenty of taxes to cover it. Didn't we just get a tax increase to pay for roads?

    Posted by: Chris on Aug 26, 2008 at 12:56 PM
    Keith...Get off of your high horse. It should be quite obvious that LS is talking about Fahey and others having lavish lunches and other functions at city expence. Please check your over active defense mechanisms at the door.

    Posted by: kathy on Aug 26, 2008 at 11:18 AM
    SPOILED PEOPLE IN THE CITY I HAVE NEVER SEEN PEOPLE COMPLAIN SO MUCH IN MY LIFE.

    Posted by: Patrick on Aug 26, 2008 at 11:09 AM
    With all the things that are going on in our communities and neighborhoods, I think this is pretty petty stuff. The old saying being, if you don't like it move. The road was gravel when you bought the home, and it will be gravel years after you move. The kids have to get to school. Sorry...

    Posted by: Jen on Aug 26, 2008 at 10:49 AM
    Funny how the politicians justify their white elephant projects' budgets as "necessary progress". And some people support them by claiming that Omaha is a "hick-town" and has to be bigger and further in debt and have more urban problems like Chicago or NYC in order to "progress"... and yet these same people don't see the irony (or hypocrisy) in leaving residential roads unpaved, in the middle of the city. It is a recurring theme here in the Big O: the city government focuses on gobbling up outlying communities that have taken care of themselves, and rarely bothers to improve the areas that have already belonged to the city for decades. (unless of course there is an opportunity for some developers to make a mint by repurposing an area) I say, if the grass is greener on the other side of the fence, that's a good sign that you are not taking proper care of the lawn on your own side...

    Posted by: b on Aug 26, 2008 at 10:04 AM
    Skip the council members raises and pave the road!! I'd rather see the money go there than to the fat cats pockets. They already get too much for a job not well done, if done at all.

    Posted by: Teresa on Aug 26, 2008 at 10:02 AM
    I live at the end of a gravel road in Elkhorn. There are 42 families living at the end of this road. Believe me I know what dust is. If there is a way to knock down some of the dust short of paving or asphalting I'd sure like to see it done on our road as well as theirs. All that dust can be a health issue for allergy sufferers and people with asthma. I know we (and they)chose to live in these areas without paved streets but Omaha has the money to do something about it. Why they don't is quite obvious. Less money for them to waste on stupidity.

    Posted by: Westomahaer on Aug 26, 2008 at 09:56 AM
    To LS. There is little doubt in many Omaha taxpayers minds; we have a mismanaged city. It is not necessary to extend that mismanagement. Taxpayers should not have to pay to pave gravel roads. The property owners increase in property value will offset part of the cost. Increased property tax revenues will pay for other services and benefits the owners will receive. I don't care if they are on social security. Many retired homeowners pay reduced property taxes using the homestead exemption. If you are a property owner you need to pay your own way, move, or sellout.

    Posted by: Anonymous on Aug 26, 2008 at 09:17 AM
    Come on! A little dust doesnt hurt anyone. There is to much else in this life to complain and worry aabout!

    Posted by: Citizen on Aug 26, 2008 at 09:15 AM
    Another example of how the city will annex extra land even though they have left a great deal of SID land unfinished, because it is not profittable for them to be responsible for. It is time for a law which states NO ANNEXATION ALLOWED IF A CITY HAS SID AREAS UNCARED FOR. This is why the tree pick up map had so many blanks that would not be considered even though the city recieved money from FEMA. The city is being run like a toy for the wealthy politicians to set up their retirement on the backs of the retired being the ones to be forced out one way or the other. I am sick of seeing the lack of RESPECT for their ELDERS, this used to matter when I was young. If these planners have their way they will be homeless due to high taxes with no services to help them stay in their homes. But yet we do have a RETIREMENT center building boom in town. It is time for our planners to quit playing MONOPOLY with our futures. The only priority being the bottom line, raises & a stadium not wanted

    Posted by: Keith on Aug 26, 2008 at 08:14 AM
    Calcium Chloride to solve the problem. That kind of Band-aid is too small for the wound. Its a health hazzard! Pave the road! Geez! If I had a couple million I'd do it myself and have the road named after me.

    Posted by: T on Aug 26, 2008 at 06:09 AM
    I've never understood by the neighborhood should be the one to pay for the road. The road is maintained by the city and by tax dollars. It seems silly. There are many, many dirt roads in Omaha. I think it's a little unfair to make them pay for that, especially if they haven't lived in that house since it was built. Seems a little uneven.

    Posted by: Anonymous on Aug 26, 2008 at 02:40 AM
    ok this is probly not the first year that the road has been dusty like this so why now are people complaining people have drove this road for years kicking up dust

    Posted by: Keith on Aug 26, 2008 at 12:36 AM
    LS, I don't understand you. You talk about money from the wealthy and selfish, but your suggestion is taking funded lunches and dinners from the poor! Which is it? Money from the wealthy or food from the poor? I'm a disabled father with children receiving free lunches at school. Every month is a crunch to make ends meet. Are my children selfish for accepting a good meal five times a week? Are they the ones who should pay for the road? I bet you have 21 or more good meals a weak. Why don't you give up a few meals each week and donate your savings to this paving project? Unless you're already on that other road...

    Posted by: LS on Aug 25, 2008 at 11:38 PM
    Spare me ok...pave the street for them! There's enough money to waste on the new stadium and other pet projects for the wealthy...pave it for our other citizens and children! Clearly the road to hell is paved every second by wealthy selfish and self-centered people! Tell hte City officials of Omaha to PAVE IT FOR THEM!We all know the money is there! A few less tax payer funded lunches and dinners will pay for it hands down!