Home  ·   News  ·   Weather  ·   Sports  ·   Jobs  ·   Community  ·   Pics N Videos  ·   Station  ·   Marketplace  ·   6 on Your Side  ·   Contests  ·   Get Connected  ·   Blogs
Health Check · Lottery · DTV · Seasonal · Mom to Mom · Traffic · The Omaha Buzz · CityCAMS · My Weather · School Closings · HS Cribs · Restaurants · McKnight Investigates
WOWT.com on Demand
6 On Your Cell
News, Sports & Weather
Information On Your Cell
Text ALERTS
Breaking News Alerts
Direct to Your Cell Phone
Daily e-News
News & Weather Updates
delivered via email
You Cast
Submit Your Pics
and Video
What's on 6
Your Guide to NBC
& WOWT Programming
Mayor Calls For City Department Cuts Save Email Print
Says $4-$6 million must be reduced from 2009 budget
Posted: 10:32 AM Dec 2, 2008
Last Updated: 10:51 PM Dec 2, 2008
Reporter: Jaime McCutcheon & Jodi Baker
Email Address: sixonline@wowt.com

A | A | A

Omaha Mayor Mike Fahey is asking all city departments to make cuts, saying Tuesday $4 million to $6 million must be removed from the budget plan for fiscal 2009.

Fahey wants proposals from from every city department as a way to survive the current national recession and avoid a budget shortfall. "By making these cuts now, we're trying to make sure we don't have to make more drastic cuts come February, March and April."

At a news conference, the mayor announced he's given department heads two weeks to come up with ideas on what they might be able to cut without sacrificing service and safety.

All departments are being ordered to trim their spending by two percent. "They will come back to me and the city finance director with their proposals. At that time, we will make the cuts necessary based on the priorities of the city."

The cuts will include the police and fire departments. "I think it's fair to say police and fire do make up 50 percent of the general fund, so a lot of the burden is going to fall on them," added Mayor Fahey.

“I'm really concerned they're gonna take our protection away,” says Carolyn Cook of Omaha. “It's already frightening."

One reason for the need in budget cuts is the city sales tax. It funds 46 percent of the city's revenue and Fahey believes it will remain flat in 2009. When asked if city services will be cut, Fahey said he can't predict what department heads will do, but that sacrifices are necessary.

"Anytime you cut, you're going to give up something. Now what that is, whether it's police cars or not buying a piece of equipment for public works, there's a lot of different things we can do."

The mayor said cuts will be prioritized and fighting crime is a top priority. So too is leaving the city solid for the next mayor in June. "To make sure we're doing these things upfront so the new administration coming in will not find themselves so much in a hole."

What do the mayoral candidates think? All three tell Channel 6 News they support the budget cuts. "There's no doubt about it, Omaha faces very serious financial difficulty and I liked the way in which the mayor approaches the problem,” said Hal Daub.

Jim Vokal also supports the mayor, as long as the cuts don't include one thing. "With the exception, I would not certainly support any cuts in staff from a police standpoint."

Jim Suttle isn't giving his thoughts on what to cut yet, but says in this difficult time one thing can help. "We need to have unity of purpose around our mayor. He is the center of the leadership for our city."

Mayor Fahey plans to review each department budget proposal and announce a final plan in two weeks. As to where the cuts will come from, city department heads Channel 6 News spoke to said it's just too soon to tell. The cuts would likely take effect in early 2009.

One Channel 6 viewer posed this question online: "Where are the priorities? We can build a $20 million bridge to nowhere?" That $20 million was federal funding, though the city did have to come up with $100,000 to make renovations to the park area surrounding the bridge.

As for maintaining the bridge, city officials say with low-energy LED lights and simple mowing and snow shoveling, those costs are minimal and they are shared with the city of Council Bluffs.

Omaha City Councilman Chuck Sigerson does see other waste, like $42,000 already approved for a streetcar study. "I said this was a waste of money. I studied trolleys all over America and I can tell you not a single one is operating in the black.”

Savings won't come from lower gas prices for city vehicles because officials locked in for a year in October at what was a good deal then, $2.41 a gallon. The metro average is now $1.61 a gallon.

A taxpayer advocate has his own suggestions, like scaling back retirement benefits and privatizing some departments. “We believe that the Public Works Department is a very good candidate for privatization, especially in their street improvement and restoration," says Doug Kagan.

Areas like snowplowing and pothole repair should not be affected, says Sigerson. "Those are things that have to be taken care of because potholes, in addition to being annoying, are public safety hazards."

More Stories
More Medicine Monitoring in Iowa

Shooting Victim Found At Ralston High School

Murder Suspect Arrested At Boys Town

Infant Seriously Hurt, Father Arrested

High Court Refuses to Hear Custody Case

Shooting Victim May Face Charges

Near Accident Leads to 2nd DUI

Blue Cross Blue Shield Moving Omaha Headquarters

Post Your Comments
First Name:
Location:
Enter Comments: characters left
Email (optional):
Email will not be displayed on site. For station contact purpose only.
Read Comments
Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
Posted by: Joe on Dec 5, 2008 at 12:08 PM
Yes the footbridge was constructed using Federal money, but upkeep of the bridge falls on local taxpayers.

Posted by: To Maybe true on Dec 4, 2008 at 11:19 AM
So your relatives spiked their hours during their last year to take advantage of a loophole that uses their last years total income to base their retirement on and you think that justifies them pillaging the retirement account? Granted that some compensation for years of service is warranted but you should not be allowed to retire for more money than you made during any year previous. Imagine if EVERONE could have such deal when they retire, just work 365 a year and get a substantial increase in retirement benefits? Every retirement account would go bankrupt in a few years! These contracts are solely the responsibility of Fahey but the officers can choose NOT to take advantage of his lack of foresight, for the benefit of the entire community, including their fellow officers who may not get the same breaks in the future because we simply cannot afford it.

Posted by: First Thing on Dec 4, 2008 at 11:05 AM
Get rid of NO-DO, the mayor's personal dream and the sole reason that he ignored all of the city's major concerns like violent crime, terrible streets and graffiti. If he hadn't been busy trying to circumvent the will of the people, we might have been in better financial straits by now. Anyone, who claims to be a VISIONARY as Fahey has, who didn't see the potential issues with booking multiple major sporting events in our city is very short-sighted. If the 'Blatt was still viable, we could have had BOTH the Olympic swim trials and the CWS at the same time! What a wonderful feather that would have been in our cap, eh? As usual, thank Mr. Fahey for this travesty, especially if you didn't sign the recall petition. Let him know how you feel about his ego driven approach to governing this city. He only makes Daub look better, though I wouldn't vote him or anyone associated with MECA or the City Council. These are the nuts who got us into this mess because of their own agendas!

Posted by: jd on Dec 4, 2008 at 09:46 AM
HEY SCOTT: I pay into my pension, too. I also pay into my 401. Fortunately, I've made money, as I consulted with a financial adviser who helped me choose conservative investments. What is a "fair" amount for health care coverage. I am single and pay approximately $58 per check. Some of my coworkers on the family plan pay well over $100 per check. I have no credit card debt, I paid off my student loan early, my home will be paid for in 6 years, and my car is paid for, too. I am VERY, VERY lucky, BLESSED actually. I feel the pain of my coworkers who are maxed out on their credit cards, have enormous house payments, and drive great big shiny SUVs, oh, and also have all the new expensive gadgets. Good luck, my friend, I hope your union can protect your wage/benefits. Times will get worse for us working men and women.

Posted by: LLR on Dec 4, 2008 at 09:33 AM
Yes, we all have to tighten our budgets in economic hard times. That means most of us do without the "extras" and focus on spending our limited dollars on necessities. Hmmm...anyone wonder what the "extras" are in this equation? They sure aren't police, fire and public works. They WOULD be baseball stadiums, decorative manhole covers and trolley cars...

Posted by: To Steve on Dec 4, 2008 at 12:05 AM
And to all the other people complaining about the pedestrian bridge. GROW UP & GET OVER IT! The money has been spent already. JEEEEZ beside that, it was federal money, not the city of Omaha's. If you morons had have a brain you would know that already!!!!!!

Posted by: To MMM on Dec 3, 2008 at 10:24 PM
I agree with you. I heard stories of things happening. The question is, how can it be proven?

Posted by: Chris on Dec 3, 2008 at 10:03 PM
Let's send back the custom manhole covers he bought...

Posted by: Double J on Dec 3, 2008 at 06:13 PM
If the city cuts the number of workers, more work will then be contracted out, thus costing the city more money.Why don't they just get more work out of the present city work force and put a cap on contracted work.That is the way it is done in the private sector and it sure beats getting let go.

Posted by: MMMMMMM on Dec 3, 2008 at 05:45 PM
CAN SOMEONE FIND OUT THE MONEY THAT FAHEY IS RECEIVING FROM THE KIEWITTS AND THE HAWKINS CONS. OR AFTER FAHEY IS FINISHED IN THE MAYORS JOB, YOU GOTTA KNOW THAT THIS GUY IS GOING TO BE SET UP BY ONE OR MORE OF THESE CONTRACTORS.AND IF YOU DO NOT BELIEVE THIS I HAVE A FOOTBRIDGE TO SELL YOU.

Posted by: Jon on Dec 3, 2008 at 05:10 PM
I say it is fiscally responsible to assume that less money is going in the coffers due to less spending. So you budget accordingly. That makes sense to me. That's what I do (call me irresponsible). So..what you guys are doing is slamming someone for being proactive with our citys' (our) money, and future. Based on some unpopular decisions he has made in the past (no city money has been pledged for the ballpark, or was spent on the bridge construction-just the park around it). Just want to get the issues right.

Posted by: Oh No on Dec 3, 2008 at 03:54 PM
Where in my post did I say that? I respect him, for the tough decisions he has had to make, especially with the likes fo all who have nothing other to whine about than their dear pocketbook. My Gosh people, progress is not free. Was it for your folks? And speaking of your folks, did they have to tighten their budgets when the economy tanked? That would be a yes, same as the City of Omaha is required to do now. No ones fault. Situation of the world today.

Posted by: Anonymous on Dec 3, 2008 at 02:09 PM
The first thing Omaha needs to "cut" is Mike Fahey.

Posted by: To "Oh No", "Mitch", and other Fahey lovers on Dec 3, 2008 at 02:00 PM
With this year’s successful swimming event, the US Olympic Committee wanted to return to the Qwest Center with the Swimming Trials for the 2012 games. But why was it announced today that Omaha had to turn them away, you ask??? Because the CWS will be occurring at the same time DOWNTOWN…… thus, instead of hosting two big events in 2012, in separate venues, we will have room for just one. Pure Genius Omaha!!! SMOOTH MOVE FAHEY!!!!!

Posted by: FORD BLUE on Dec 3, 2008 at 01:48 PM
JENNY, ITS NOT THAT THEY ARE TIGTENING THE BUDGET ITS THAT THEY ARE GIVING MORE MONEY TO PEOPLE WHO NEED IT AND LEAVING US TO HAVE TO DEAL WITH THE CONSEQUENCES.

Posted by: Anonymous on Dec 3, 2008 at 01:36 PM
Did we really need the stupid walk bridge? We could have save ALOT of money there!!

Posted by: Maybe true on Dec 3, 2008 at 01:09 PM
To comment posted to enough already. I have family members in law enforcement and none of them have made over 100k. Now with some of the guys that retired after spiking maybe true but understand this those guys deserved it and worked 365 days literally the whole year to get that retirement. If it is so good them why don't you go do it and see for yourself how much you will make.

Posted by: Oh No on Dec 3, 2008 at 12:49 PM
My...looks like the petetion folks are out whining again. Same names, same comments, same level of intelligence. Not learned much since the recall effort, eh Folks?

Posted by: jan on Dec 3, 2008 at 12:42 PM
Fahey wasn't the only one responsible for the new stadium.

Posted by: jenny on Dec 3, 2008 at 12:40 PM
The economy is tanking - why are any of you acting like its a surprise that we'd have to tighten the City's budget???

Posted by: FORD BLUE on Dec 3, 2008 at 12:30 PM
AND GIVES RAISES TO PEOPLE WHEN WE THE PEOPLE HAVE TO TAKE THE PUNISHMENT

Posted by: L. on Dec 3, 2008 at 10:11 AM
Budget Now or Pay Later. Isn't that what the Mayor was told when negotiating the lucrative union deals with Police and Fire to get re-elected.

Posted by: DHB on Dec 3, 2008 at 09:50 AM
I did NOT vote for this "tool". I voted for Daub and Friend as well. I also not only signed but circulated recall petitions. Here it is, real simple: Stop talking about the pension plans because that's part of a UNION contract that is currently in arbitration. We cannot cut police, fire, or street crews (this includes snow-plowing and pothole/street repair). EVERYTHING else is fair game and I do mean everything. And that includes the baseball stadium and anything else that does not immediately impact public safety. And stop farming out city park maintenance to private mowing crews...who probably charge far more than what it would cost the city to pay ITS employees to do it.

Posted by: Anonymous on Dec 3, 2008 at 09:39 AM
All of you who would not support the recall have no right to be upset. All along we said it was not ALL about the stadium. You short-sightedness has doomed the city.

Posted by: Kim on Dec 3, 2008 at 09:16 AM
I agree with everything bad being said about fahey but as far as the pedestrian bridge is concerned that was a federally funded grant, use it or lose it. so it was not money coming from omaha taxpayers os lets stop whining bout that one. whining about the ballpark isnt getting you anywhere either. what would many of the businesses here do without the cws?

Posted by: w on Dec 3, 2008 at 08:28 AM
I say all the people that want the new stadium to pay the extra money. Lets keep the police and firefighters. Does this also mean no new manhole covers? Fahey killed the Crossroads and Omaha.

Posted by: paul on Dec 3, 2008 at 08:13 AM
Just maybe we should consider not paying for a report on trolley systems,and not spending money on a baseball stadium we don't need right now

Posted by: Anna on Dec 3, 2008 at 07:38 AM
Hey Fahey, if you want the ball stadium so badly, why don't you pay for it with your own personal paycheck and leave those who actually work for a living alone. You've spent enough of my tax money since I've been in this city for 40 years. I hope that you, Fahey, enjoy all of those things that you want, like the stadium and that useless bridge. Have fun walking across that thing! And don't let the river suck you up! And thanks a lot for all that you've "accomplished" in this city. You've been a real example of what this city doesn't need. Congrats on letting everyone down!

Posted by: michelle on Dec 3, 2008 at 07:13 AM
Maybe you should of thought a little more about anexing ELKHORN! Give it back

Posted by: to enough already on Dec 3, 2008 at 06:01 AM
some police officers make around 100 grand a year in retirement. dont seem like bad money to me

Posted by: Bill on Dec 3, 2008 at 05:39 AM
Who ever the new mayor will be, he has got a big mess to clean up. Fahey didn't listen to what the voters were saying. I wonder how much he and Ken Stinson (Peter Kiewit) will make of the ballpark deal. The number one priority in this town is cutting the crime rate. This mayor has ignored this problem. This town is not safe wherever you go. Just as some of you liberals think George Bush is the worst President we have had, this mayor will go down as the worst mayor Omaha has ever had. Mike, go to the Ozarks and don't come back. BTW, take your good ole buddy Ken Stinson with you.

Posted by: Larry on Dec 3, 2008 at 03:37 AM
Fahey you can start saving the city right now by quitting and throwing your salary into the kitty. At least with you out now, you can't fire up any more 1/2 million dollar BS trolley studies. Go back to your rich West O neighborhood with all your crazy and expensive idea's that this city doesn't need. Lets hope our next mayor isn't a professional politician (like Daub), but rather someone who has worked for a living and knows what it's like to struggle and manage a budget.

Posted by: carol on Dec 3, 2008 at 01:15 AM
Fahey has no one to blame but himself as to why the city is so far in debt. The half billion dollars he has put the city of Omaha in debt with should have been the first indication of trouble with the budget. And, now he is going to make crime his top priority??????? I hope the people of Omaha are a lot more careful when it comes time to vote in a new mayor. I also hope you remember who is running is also someone on the city council and what they did hand in hand with the mayor. Vote carefully.

Posted by: Rick on Dec 2, 2008 at 11:31 PM
Whoever commented on the police department being top heavy, what about Omaha Fire. I think the last stat I saw was that over half the department was a captain or above. If I am incorrect please let me know.

Posted by: Concerned Citizen on Dec 2, 2008 at 11:27 PM
I completely disagree with Mr. Kagans notion of privatizing the Public Works Department. The private sector would rape the city for all it is worth. I have been on both sides and I know what I am talking about.

Posted by: Scott on Dec 2, 2008 at 11:25 PM
HEY JD - I pay more into my pension and personal retirement than you do - I'd wager a paycheck on it. Every bit of overtime I get there is an additional amount that goes to the retirement fund - the WHOLE police retirement fund not just mine. As far as the excuse of the economy it's a fact. What do you do for a living? Do you get overtime? Do you pay into your retirement or do you just invest? If you invest how's your account - if you'r making money then by all means tell the rest of us how to do it. I am thinking you are in a hole like the rest of us. As far as paying for insurance most if not all of the officers I talk to have no problem with paying a "fair" rate and getting to choose our plan. We are getting BCBS back so that makes me happy. If I have to pay to aid in the cost so be it - no whining here. There's plenty of other waste within our Department that SHOULD be looked at but because "it's always been done this way or that way" the waste will continue. KNOW THE FACTS!!

Posted by: js on Dec 2, 2008 at 10:39 PM
I TOLD YOU SO!! That is to all who voted for Fahey in the first place. Police and Fire put 15% of their pay into their pension!! "Normal" workers dont come close to that, take 15% of your pay, and pretend you dont get that. The way crime is including shooting officers, we need to keep the pay for police and fire competitive compared with the rest of the country! The problem is with poor investments including the pedestrian bridge and the ballpark which seem to be padding Fahey's pocketbook and making this city go broke! Daub was already making great decisions for the city, should have continued with the ideas. Daub had two drivers for as involved as he was. Fahey-only one part-time, since spending his time in the Ozarks all the time. The city should beable to save money by not paying him anymore.

Posted by: dc on Dec 2, 2008 at 10:36 PM
One good cost cutting measure would be to get rid of the mayors private car that he is driven around in by a chauffer. Most all other elected officials in town have to drive themselves around, why not the mayor.

Posted by: Angie on Dec 2, 2008 at 10:35 PM
Why is everybody so nasty about the police/fire benefits when they know nothing about them?? Last I checked my insurance paid for my well woman exam and for my well baby visits for my child. My husband is a police officer and his insurance does not pay for these things therefore we do pay for insurance, I get it through my job. Also, the police '401K' like you have at your job--if you leave you take a vested amount--the police get zero back, they either stay in one job for 20 years or they lose every bit of money they may have made in all those years working for another company. My husband works hard as many others in other professions do, but we are not rolling in the dough living in a mansion in the hills. I'm sorry a very small proportion took advantage of the system, but it was just that--a select few. If you are jealous that you can't have all these luxuries than sign up!

Posted by: Scott on Dec 2, 2008 at 10:27 PM
Well, serves the city right. Wasting money on bridges, baseball stadiums, and other "improvements". How about tearing down that bridge, restoring Rosenblatt, and getting your moron mayor out.

Posted by: Omaha on Dec 2, 2008 at 09:55 PM
All you fools voted this tool in. I voted for Daub, then I voted for Friend, should of followed the lead!!! Don't blame the police and firefighters, they are just getting $ for a job the rest of you complainers are too scared to do! Hey Fahey--how about we take your job early. The city can run itself!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Taxpayer on Dec 2, 2008 at 09:51 PM
wow...cut the police and fire budgets but spend $140 million on a ballpark??!! He's a smart one that Fahey....how soon do we replace him????

Posted by: Anne on Dec 2, 2008 at 09:40 PM
Are you kidding me? He didn't see the financial problems that the rest of us have seen for the last several months. Give me a break. Ditch that stadium that is only going to benefit the CWS, especially now that the Royals are planning a move. What is wrong with Fahey? He should be ashamed of the way he has driven this city into the ground. The reason the police and fire pensions are what they are has every thing to do with Fahey needing their votes last time around, now we all pay. And comparable to other cities with our crime rate, those unions have it good.

Posted by: Concerned on Dec 2, 2008 at 09:03 PM
How about the fire department get rid of the loaded Chevy Tahoes that the Chiefs, who do not make runs, drive; everywhere; home, work, play.....

Posted by: Jay on Dec 2, 2008 at 08:40 PM
The people on Lake of the Ozarks had better look out Fahey is coming your way. Hopefully he moves there to his house and gets the heck out of Omaha

Posted by: Jake on Dec 2, 2008 at 08:21 PM
The sooner this Clown of Mayor is out of office, the better off this city will be. Dont let the door hit you in the backside this Spring Fahey!

Posted by: Chris on Dec 2, 2008 at 07:58 PM
I like how one of Mayor Fahey's ideas is to not purchase a new police cruzier, or atleast that is kind of suggested. Have you seen some of the Omaha Police cruziers. They are rusting with old cracked lights and some fairly ancient looking interiors. They'll find a way to make that money, but cutting funding from a city department thats needs are underscored but the violence in recent weeks. Oh well, I suppose that is better than raising already rediculous property taxes again. Its a lose/ lose, maybe they just need some new accountants?

Posted by: cd on Dec 2, 2008 at 07:44 PM
"budget misinformation" is exactly right. Cut police and fire services, and then just watch the complaints come in about how people didn't get help in a timely manner, etc. For those who feel these civil servants make too much money, let me just say this--professional athletes make millions of dollars to "play games", yet the people out there saving lives and being shot at make nothing in comparison. What price do you put on a life?? Omaha definitely needs to get their priorities straight.

Posted by: Ben on Dec 2, 2008 at 07:19 PM
Now we have to have spending cuts. If we have to cut spending why did we waste so much money on that pedestrian bridge? How much money are we going to waste on a trolly/street car? Which is more important, getting the things we would like to have or the things we need? Let's get our priorities straight.

Posted by: Budget Misinformation on Dec 2, 2008 at 06:56 PM
The police and fire departments may be 50% of the GENERAL FUND, but that is misleading. The GENERAL FUND is not the total appropriations for the city. The total city budget for 2009 is $557.5 million. The Fire budget is $73mil. (or 13.1% of the total budget) the Police is $93mil. (or 16.7% of the total budget). On the other hand the Public works budget is $146million (or 26.3% of the budget). The budget is posted on the city's website. When was the last time someone from Public Works saved your life or the life of someone you loved, at 2am, 4 minutes after you called for help? Don't believe everything you read in the media.

Posted by: Tony on Dec 2, 2008 at 06:36 PM
Instead of cutting vital things that are necessary,the mayor should forget the 140 million dollar stadium that will be used 2 weeks out of the year and the 350,000 study for a dumd trolley system that will be unused like the stadium once the newness wears off of it.His projects are a joke and waste of money that could and should be used elsewhere,especially in todays trying economic times!

Posted by: Enough already on Dec 2, 2008 at 06:35 PM
1st off MARY I don't know what you do for a living so don't take harsh to this. Police officers DO NOT MAKE ALOT OF MONEY I just seen today that you can get hired at Mcdonalds making $10.00 an hour. Now with that said a cop starts out his career at $17 and hour yeah only $7 dollars more than a Mcdonalds worker (no disrespect to Mcdonalds employees by any means). I respect all officers for what they do and give them much credit for putting up with what they do for the amount of money they make. Now we have Fahey saying if we have to we will cut down on new police cars. Wow here we are with the economy going down hill and crime rising and this mayor wants to cut on public safety what a joke. This city is going down hill not because of the economy but because of the crazy ideas ie manhole covers, pedestrian bridge (although it is very neat and attractive), and a billion dollar new stadium, etc.etc.etc. Scary what goes on is this city and who makes the choices. Cutting officer $$==trouble.

Posted by: kms on Dec 2, 2008 at 06:33 PM
fahey has ruined this town! a ball stadium that is going to cost us an arm and leg. he wants the city departments to cut budgets? that is fine and dandy, but the amount of fire and police people out patroling our city better NOT be jeopardized cause pathetic Fahey can't manage his budget!

Posted by: Concerned on Dec 2, 2008 at 06:02 PM
How about for the fire department, we fire the 2 retired assistant chiefs that were "rehired" days after they retired. We don't need them as "consultants". Maybe I will post some more suggestions later...

Posted by: tee on Dec 2, 2008 at 05:56 PM
right on Steve, non essential=not needed How bout police and fire pay? Those leeches are gonna bankrupt the city. It's only gonna get worse when they can't issue anymore bonds cause nobody has $$ to buy them. Move while you still can people.

Posted by: Steve on Dec 2, 2008 at 05:01 PM
I have a good idea as to how to cut government waste and personnel. Whenever there's snowy days, the city always issues broadcasts saying that only essential personnel need to show up. If you're not one of those people, you're fired.

Posted by: Ls on Dec 2, 2008 at 04:35 PM
As previously said...the stadium should not have passed and Fahey should have been recalled but the people who DID NOT SIGN THE RECALL PETITION are equally tp blame. Now you all look like fools and if the shoe fits (as it clearly does on your feet) wear it and whine no more. And maybe you all should make up the shortfall!

Posted by: Downtown Dave on Dec 2, 2008 at 04:13 PM
Easy enough, let all City employees retire at more that they were making while working then don't replace the vacant positions. That way the worker left can work a lot of overtime and build up their pensions.

Posted by: Downtown Dave on Dec 2, 2008 at 04:11 PM
Let's see, this Mayor has already given taxpayers a ball park with no citizen vote; Omaha Police and Fire Personnel one of the most liberal and out of control pension and benefits in the area; has let his Chief of staff run the City during his numerous trips out of town; and now he does not want to leave the next Mayor in a financial bind. Should things have not been addressed in the past? Oh yea, we can blame it all on the recession. Goodbye Mr. Mayor, the sooner the better.

Posted by: jd on Dec 2, 2008 at 03:43 PM
To: Scott. THE ECONOMY, is the excuse the auto CEO's are using for their problems. You need to take a look outside, you know, the real world, where real people pay for part of their insurance and don't have a nice pensions.

Posted by: Mike on Dec 2, 2008 at 03:34 PM
Of course maybe the Mayor can promote some more people in the police department where they are already top heavy. five command officers( a captain, Lt. and three sgt's in one precinct to "command" 12 officers on any given shift. One of those command officers is a administration only command and monitors equipment within the precinct.A civilian can handle that job at far less money then a Sgt's pay. My understanding is they have even had Lt.'s in this same position. It's happening in every section of the police department. Where is the logic folks?? Start your budget cuts there Mr. Mayor. Mike Mcknight I challenge you to look into this wasteful spending within the Omaha Police Department

Posted by: ToddM on Dec 2, 2008 at 03:24 PM
How come the cities, counties or states in this country that are now either begging for a federal bailout or hitting a wall because of mismanagement or excessive spending are run by a Democrat, or in California, a RINO? I'm not saying they're all Democrats but a huge majority are. I guess when the gravy train is rolling, you spend, tax, spend, tax, spend and tax. Like Omaha.

Posted by: Debbie on Dec 2, 2008 at 03:19 PM
Well it's too bad that more people weren't thinking ahead when the recall was out there. It's seems like there are a lot of people who have common sense just not in our political system. We are all going to pay for Fahey's mistakes and he's going to move on without a glance behind. Hope people don't start losing their jobs because of his poor financial planning.

Posted by: Sandi on Dec 2, 2008 at 03:00 PM
Amazing, money for the pedestrian bridge, money for the "decorated O" manhole covers and the Ballpark that will only be used 2 weeks out of the year(thank goodness i live in Papillion, now i can reap some benefit for getting the Royals team, if it goes through)..and what else did Fahey spend that was not needed. Poor Omaha, i remember not long ago, Omaha had a positive reserve in the budget...Time for Fahey to moooooooove out!

Posted by: M on Dec 2, 2008 at 02:44 PM
If we call Fahey the "CEO" of Omaha, do you think Bush will give us some "bail out" money?

Posted by: Bob on Dec 2, 2008 at 02:27 PM
Yes, get rid of the Horse Patrol.....What a waste move the 6 or so officers to where crime is actually occurring and have them patrol. and not hire 6 new officers, the savings would make up half of what hes looking for.

Posted by: T from Elkhorn on Dec 2, 2008 at 02:26 PM
And you all wondered why Elkhorn did not want to be annexed! We had a city with a Mayor that knew how to run a city right, now we have Fahey. You all had your chance to recall him, where were you then?

Posted by: Reality on Dec 2, 2008 at 02:09 PM
It's amazing Fahey does this in his last 6 months in office. They need to start with the police and firefighters. Those unions are no different then the unions that were bringing down the airline industry a few years ago and which are currently hurting the automotive industry today. Politicians do anything for votes and then try to look strong at the end of their term. Spiking among the police and the "shoot-to-retire" philosophy are a joke. Integrity is lacking in those departments.

Posted by: D on Dec 2, 2008 at 02:09 PM
It is absolutely astonishing how purposely misinformed the media has allowed the public to become regarding anything to do with police, fire, pensions, healthcare benefits, crime rates/stats, retirements, raises (or lack thereof), equipment, manpower and how any or all of these actually affect taxpayers. The political climate in this city is shameful.

Posted by: Anonymous on Dec 2, 2008 at 02:07 PM
No, see, the purpose of "studies" is to get kickbacks from the consultation outfits that get the contracts to do the studies.

Posted by: Anonymous on Dec 2, 2008 at 01:56 PM
Cut taxes and city services!

Posted by: glad not ot live in omaha on Dec 2, 2008 at 01:17 PM
ANOTHER TOP STORY. THE DOUGLAS COUNT COMMISSIONERS JUST VOTED ON A 3.5%PAY RAISE FOR THE NON-UNION COUNTY EMPLOYEES? District Court Bailiffs 3.0%, Sheriffs Captains 2.0% Purchasing Agent 3.5% Veterans Services Officer 3.5% OK, SO THEY CAN GIVE THEMSELVES RAISES BUT MAKE CUTS OTHER PLACES?

Posted by: TW on Dec 2, 2008 at 12:57 PM
It's time the police and firefighters start paying for their health premiums like the rest of us.

Posted by: David on Dec 2, 2008 at 12:57 PM
All of you whinners had your chance! It was called a RECALL. You let it pass by and kept this bufoon in office. You now have no reason to complain.

Posted by: DJ on Dec 2, 2008 at 12:41 PM
Cut the 140 million from the ball park. We sure don't need one at this time. We have a ball park that will hold up for 10 yrs. and if the cws doesn't like it let them move. Who will take them at this time when everyone is cutting back???

Posted by: CUTS??? on Dec 2, 2008 at 12:35 PM
WE HAVE A CITY IN NEED OF MORE POLICE OFFICERS, NOT LESS. WE HAVE 20 YEAR OLD YELLOW FIRE TRUCKS ON THE ROAD...LOOKING FORWARD TO THE NEW BALL PARK (HA-HA) OH, AND WE LOVE THOSE DECORATIVE MANHOLE COVERS!! GET GOING FAHEY!!

Posted by: Scott on Dec 2, 2008 at 12:24 PM
Let me clear up a few things for those who have been mislead by the mayor and media reference police/fire pensions. The City offered and approved the contract/retirement system. Secondly it really isn't the few retirees who "padded" their pension that is causing the shortfall - IT'S THE ECONOMY!! I work for the police department. Yes we've had a few pad their retirement BUT that's not the issue. We've lost millions of dollars due to the economy. Just like everyone (including myself) who invest in the marked we've ALL lost money. So please get that through your heads. Also some of us are just as disgusted at some of those retirees because some never did a darn thing their whole career and then in the last 12 months milked the system. The mayor needs 6 officers, 3 Sgts., 2 Lts and 1 Captain as a group to give real ideas on department waste. Put real common sense to work. We officers could save hundreds of thousand of dollars if our input was used -but it's not.

Posted by: Anonymous on Dec 2, 2008 at 12:19 PM
Mike Fayhe, I hope you know what your doing cause your already doing something stupid making another baseball stadium when we already have one now your wanting to make cuts get real. You need to retire I can't wait until somebody takes over for you. But while your still mayor for Omaha which I feel sorry for people in Omaha you better think of smart things not stupid things like that baseball stadium which you are building. Anonamous

Posted by: RM on Dec 2, 2008 at 12:14 PM
Any future mayor is going to have a financial hole to dig out of because of this mayor and the previous mayors spending practices. Lets see him cut the extremely bloated pension plan. Fahey kept spending where Daub left off we don't need him in either.

Posted by: Dorothy on Dec 2, 2008 at 12:12 PM
I certainly hope the $350,000 deal to do "another" study for the street car/rail system is cancelled. It is not needed, one was done 2 years ago. With money due on the Quest Center, the new stadium, the new bridge, etc, let common sense prevail and put this "progressive" thinking on hold until the economy settles down. The people of the this city need to make their wishes known to the mayor and city council. We can only stand so much foolishness!

Posted by: Amy on Dec 2, 2008 at 11:56 AM
Maybe he should have thought about that before he forced a new unwanted stadium upon us. With crime the way it is and people being shot every day I don't think it is the time to be cutting cutting back with the OPD. He has got to realize that nobody in this city respects him.

Posted by: mw on Dec 2, 2008 at 11:50 AM
Fahey - you are a joke. Enough said.

Posted by: DR on Dec 2, 2008 at 11:45 AM
If I was a recently retired police officer or firefighter sitting on my "fat" pension benefits, I would not get too comfortable..soon the citizens of Omaha will realize what a fiasco these benefits will cost the taxpayer in the future and will demand these over generous benefits be cut.

Posted by: Anonymous on Dec 2, 2008 at 11:42 AM
OH BABY FAHEY IT IS TIME FOR YOU TO GET OUT OF OFFICE. WITH ALL OF THE CRIME IN THIS CITY HOW CAN YOU EXPECT THE OPD TO CUT THERE BUDGET? LET'S NOT BUILD A BALL FIELD THAT WE NOT ONLY CANNOT AFFORD BUT WILL ONLY BE USED ONE WEEK IN THE SUMMER. GREAT JOB FAHEY.

Posted by: jane on Dec 2, 2008 at 11:31 AM
What a guy, looking out for the next guy. Hopefully the new mayor will have some sense on how to budget like the rest of us have to do.

Posted by: LLR on Dec 2, 2008 at 11:30 AM
This city had the opportunity to retain Hal Daub as mayor six or seven years ago. Instead, Fahey won in a squeaker and we are left with unplowed, icy streets full of potholes; police and fire fighters retiring with huge pensions at astronomical rates; crime on the increase...do I need to go on? I suggest you cut the fall-der-all, Mike...of course you want to leave a gigantic mess when you leave so you'll look like a saint compared to your successor...way to go. Typical "slash-and-burn politics". GOOD RIDDANCE.

Posted by: mary on Dec 2, 2008 at 11:26 AM
So, are we not spending $350,000 for a trolley system study?? Give me a break, I am sick of all these politicians. We can build a $20M bridge to nowhere but we have to raise water/sewer rates to pay for a sewer system upgrade. While I sincerely appreciate all the police and firefighters do for all of us, why are we letting their pension plan bankrupt the city?? Let's get back to reality...WHERE ARE THE PRIORITIES???? I have not had more than a 3% raise in each of the last 6 years. How are we supposed to make ends meet?? Someone has to get a clue but it won't be anybody in city hall. I bet the mayor isn't personally cutting back on anything.

Posted by: Steve on Dec 2, 2008 at 11:09 AM
I'm pretty sure this is NOT due to the national economy. Rather, it's probably due to the millions of dollars he spent on the pedestrian bridge & all the millions that will be spent on the new downtown stadium. This kind of action by the mayor is TOTALLY PREPOSTEROUS ! ! !

Posted by: Anonymous on Dec 2, 2008 at 11:06 AM
maybe they could get that $350 thousand back for the street car study. Way to go Mayor. Try not to do any more damage before you leave us. Dont worry you will be remembered.

Posted by: j on Dec 2, 2008 at 11:05 AM
I know, how about, instead of cutting services and budgets, we just postpone a multi-million dollar ballpark. Problem solved.

Posted by: Ralph on Dec 2, 2008 at 11:05 AM
Fahey is a joke. All this money being spent on a study for a rail car system, a new baseball stadium and riverfront development. The city cant give services to the city as it is and he wants to cut??? Dont let the door hit you on the way out Mike.

Posted by: Todd on Dec 2, 2008 at 10:44 AM
Yea, lets cut city services so we can build a new un-needed stadium... Learn how to manage the money we already have!

Posted by: Evan on Dec 2, 2008 at 10:43 AM
Why is the mayor pushing a study for Streetcars one week and the next asking for cuts from city departments. Does this make sense to you?

Posted by: Anonymous on Dec 2, 2008 at 10:39 AM
At least we'll have a shiny, new baseball stadium that nobody will use.

Posted by: ??? on Dec 2, 2008 at 10:38 AM
Gotta push through those budget cuts now so there is money on the books once ground breaks on that new stadium...or the next batch of officers retire. Fahey is waiting until he is on the way OUT OF OFFICE to start making budget cuts?? Nice one.

AP Online Network
YOU CAST - YOUR PICS N VIDEOS
Media Partners