Home  ·   News  ·   Weather  ·   Sports  ·   Jobs  ·   Community  ·   Pics N Videos  ·   Station  ·   Marketplace  ·   6 on Your Side  ·   Contests  ·   Get Connected  ·   Blogs
Health Check · Lottery · DTV · Seasonal · Mom to Mom · Traffic · The Omaha Buzz · CityCAMS · My Weather · School Closings · HS Cribs · Restaurants · McKnight Investigates
WOWT.com on Demand
6 On Your Cell
News, Sports & Weather
Information On Your Cell
Text ALERTS
Breaking News Alerts
Direct to Your Cell Phone
Daily e-News
News & Weather Updates
delivered via email
You Cast
Submit Your Pics
and Video
What's on 6
Your Guide to NBC
& WOWT Programming
Safe Haven Bill Advances, Another Teen Abandoned Save Email Print
Fifteen-year-old left at Grand Island hospital
Posted: 8:49 AM Nov 19, 2008
Last Updated: 2:34 PM Nov 19, 2008
Reporter: Dennis Wilden
Email Address: sixonline@wowt.com

A | A | A

The Nebraska Legislature gave second-round approval Wednesday to a new Safe Haven bill that sets a 30-day age limit on the children that could be dropped off at a hospital.

The vote was 41-6 to advance the proposal to a final vote and state senators are expected to pass the measure on Friday. Nebraska Gov. Dave Heineman is expected to sign it into law immediately.

One of the most vocal opponents of Safe Haven said the change will protect older children from suffering the emotional trauma of being abandoned.

"My green vote is a vote against the Safe Haven concept and in favor of bringing an end to dropping off these unfortunate children,” said Sen. Ernie Chambers of Omaha.

Even as the Legislature meets this week in special session to fix the Safe Haven Law that took effect in July, another teen has been abandoned at a Nebraska hospital.

Todd Landry, director of the Division of Children and Family Services for the Department of Health and Human Services, said a 15-year-old girl was left at St. Francis Medical Center in Grand Island.

Landry said the Hall County youth was left at the hospital by her guardian, a relative, late Tuesday afternoon. The girl is now in a foster home.

This was the 26th instance of use of LB 157 and the 35th child left at a hospital under the law since September 13th. As has been widely reported, the Safe Haven Law was passed with no age limit. That allowed people from as far away as Michigan and Indiana to abandon children in Nebraska without fear of penalty.

More Stories
Murdered Store Clerk Remembered

Shooting Victim Found Near Ralston High School

Murder Suspect Arrested At Boys Town Returned to Indiana

High Court Refuses to Hear Custody Case

Lawmakers to Consider Red Light Cameras

Armed Robbery in Car

Infant Seriously Hurt, Father Arrested

Shooting Victim May Face Charges

Post Your Comments
First Name:
Location:
Enter Comments: characters left
Email (optional):
Email will not be displayed on site. For station contact purpose only.
Read Comments
Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
Posted by: LLR on Nov 22, 2008 at 02:45 AM
The law is now the LAW. No more children over the age of 30 days can be abandoned, or the parents or guardians WILL face charges. Can't wait to find out how many last-minute drop-offs there were tonight. Probably not any from Michigan, or Florida...or any other state outside a five hour window. At last the law can do what it was SUPPOSED to do...save babies from dumpsters. Instead of "saving" sociopathic teens tied up in the ER when they should have been dumped in kearney or the DC Youth detention Center.

Posted by: To Cece on Nov 21, 2008 at 11:35 AM
Has anyone done extensive tests on these kids to determine if the "behavioral issues" are not linked to a "mental issue"? Please provide that information or perhaps take a class or two in psychology before you ASSUME that a behavioral issue is not related to a mental issue

Posted by: just wondering on Nov 20, 2008 at 06:55 PM
have there been any kids under 30 days abandoned yet? all I hear about are the teens. and is the girl in G.I. the only one from outside Omaha metro and Lincoln?

Posted by: cece on Nov 20, 2008 at 08:57 AM
As a follow up. I heard an interview with someone from Alegent on a local radio station and it sounded like most if not all of these recent 'safe haven' cases were children with behavioral NOT mental issues.

Posted by: Terry on Nov 19, 2008 at 09:24 PM
These so called guardians, need to stop and think about what they are doing to these kids.

Posted by: Anonymous on Nov 19, 2008 at 08:14 PM
anon: How do you know that each one of those children need special medical help? Not all cases are the same. The first case was a man who left his 7 children cause his wife died, ect. So why would those kids need special medical help? Dont blame the State! Why it may not be perfect, There is help provided. Im sure if it was looked in to, some of those parents never even attempted help. Dont lump all cases into ones like yours. If you cant raise your kids and be a parent, DONT HAVE THEM. Its not that tough. While some situations may be different, you cant say that EVERY ONE OF THE CHILDREN needed special medical help.

Posted by: anon on Nov 19, 2008 at 07:14 PM
having dealt with the so called health and human services (what a oxymoron) I can see why these parents end up using the safe haven law. We have dealt with at least 8 different sections each time to be told no one can help us go try this department where we got the same run around. Every one of the children dropped off need special medical help but the great state of BE is too busy worring about bridges and man hole covers and where the state fair should be. Way to go huskers.

Posted by: Ex-Brit on Nov 19, 2008 at 05:04 PM
Michelle...thanks for the laugh! You are obviously either not a parent or someone with an extremely low threshold for stress. Parenting is stressful it is meant to be, and it doesn't stop after one year! I think my children are on a mission to drive me insane, and I wouldn't change one minute of the time I have with them! Parenting is the hardest thing that anyone will ever do and also the most fulfilling. I will happily spend my time stressed and insane and with my beloved children!

Posted by: Delancey on Nov 19, 2008 at 04:56 PM
Thank you Cece for injecting a much needed dose of sanity into this debate! You are completely correct, these are two separate issues and clearly from number the children that have been abandoned, something needs to be done to assist these parents. Parenting is stressful and it is supposed to be, abandoning your children should never be an option.

Posted by: TO TODDM on Nov 19, 2008 at 04:10 PM
What would your suggestion be? This law is to protect babies from being left in garbage cans and bathroom stalls. It is sad that people can discard a human life like this, but at least with the safe haven the babies won't just be left to die. They will be taken care of in a hospital. Since you seem to have all of the answers what is your solution?

Posted by: To Deb on Nov 19, 2008 at 03:25 PM
After a year the stresses of parenthood have taken effect? GIVE ME A BREAK. My oldest daughter is 15 years old and I find new "stresses" every day. Will she grow to be a good, decent person? Did she study hard enough for that test? Did we help with her homework enough? Will she be a studious driver with her permit? There will ALWAYS be stress when you are parent, regardless of their age. You love them with all your heart and pray that you do the right thing for your child. 30 days is better than the 3 that was considered, but dont say after a year the stress is in effect. Thats plain old bad parenting!!

Posted by: Michelle on Nov 19, 2008 at 03:06 PM
30 days is not long enough. In 30 days, you haven't totally felt the stress of having a child or realized whether you can handle it or not. If this is about saving kids, then let's save all the kids not just those of a certain age.

Posted by: ToddM on Nov 19, 2008 at 01:59 PM
So this is like the lemon law for cars, but for children? It's sad we've become so progressive a society that we can discard children like an animal or problem-ridden car.

Posted by: jen on Nov 19, 2008 at 12:07 PM
I thought it should be 1 year, but 30 days is way better than 3.

Posted by: Anonymous on Nov 19, 2008 at 11:58 AM
30 days is not long enough!

Posted by: LLR on Nov 19, 2008 at 11:39 AM
Good. It needs to be 30 days. And someone needs to gag Stuthman if he keeps pushing to leave it as is. Also, studies show that the human brain is not fully developed until at least age 25. Any alcohol or drugs ingested in teen years can adversely affect brain development. That said, what about all these drugs they prescribe for much YOUNGER children, such as Ritalin, for things like ADHD and hyperactivity? You think THOSE drugs aren't affecting young minds? I highly doubt that cases of ADHD have triple-folded in the past 20 years. I think that parents with much less patience and time on their hands are over-drugging their kids in the early years and this is leading to maladjusted, sociopathic teenagers. Just my $0.02. (PS: Of course if you were still allowed to discipline your kids the way my generation was, my guess is we'd have a 90% decrease in problem teens).

Posted by: fed up on Nov 19, 2008 at 10:35 AM
What goes around comes around...Some of this is a result of how children are now raised. No accountability, no regular parents to raise them, no love and attention, no supervision. Games, video and TV have been raising the kids..Parents need to be parents and if you can't than make sure you don't have kids...but then there is the issue of teen pregnancy, so kids are having kids, but LETS NOT PREVENT ...and of course we now expect the state and the tax payers $$ to handle the issues. In the end, the children pay the price. VERY SAD state of affairs.

Posted by: CJ on Nov 19, 2008 at 10:16 AM
Mitch- I do not find one ounce of humor in this. These children and their parents are suffering and it's only getting worse. Cece I agree 100%. BOTH issues need addressing, separately!

Posted by: helen j on Nov 19, 2008 at 10:07 AM
when will it end? I am outraged. the legistlature needs to fix this and fix health care for the elderly

Posted by: D on Nov 19, 2008 at 10:05 AM
I like the 30 days better than the 3 days.

Posted by: Tom on Nov 19, 2008 at 09:53 AM
Its about time they changed this, to bad it has taken 35 kids to do it.

Posted by: Like A Regular Job on Nov 19, 2008 at 09:51 AM
Get that blasted 30-day limit bill signed and into law before the weekend, or you're all fired!

Posted by: cece on Nov 19, 2008 at 09:31 AM
This is becoming really frustrating. These cases are NOT Safe Haven cases. These sound like parents or guardians who need help with out of control children. There are two separate issues here. One, scared, teenage mothers who are hiding the fact that they are having a baby and potentially dumping it in a dumpster. Two, parents that need behavioral or mental help with their children. The later does not fall into the Safe Haven category. Clearly both issues need attention but trying to lump both into one category will not help us solve the problem and just caused needless debate. Who could argue that babies under the age of 30 days should be accepted. The real issue is that for some reason parents need the help for the older children. That is the issue that should be debated.

Posted by: Mitch on Nov 19, 2008 at 09:24 AM
This keeps getting funnier with every new kid left. It really makes Nebraska look good in the eyes of the world. Great job!

Posted by: Deb on Nov 19, 2008 at 09:22 AM
I still think it needs to be a year. by then the sresses of parenthood have taken affect. I really don't think 30 days is long enough...

AP Online Network
YOU CAST - YOUR PICS N VIDEOS
Media Partners