Home  ·   News  ·   Weather  ·   Sports  ·   Jobs  ·   Community  ·   Pics N Videos  ·   Station  ·   Marketplace  ·   6 on Your Side  ·   Contests  ·   Get Connected  ·   Blogs
Health Check · Lottery · DTV · Seasonal · Mom to Mom · Traffic · The Omaha Buzz · CityCAMS · My Weather · School Closings · HS Cribs · Restaurants · McKnight Investigates
DTV news, with your converter box scan for digital channels. You may need to move the box around the room or get an antenna. Be prepared for the Feb 17 digital transition! Click here for more info.
WOWT.com on Demand
6 On Your Cell
News, Sports & Weather
Information On Your Cell
Text ALERTS
Breaking News Alerts
Direct to Your Cell Phone
Daily e-News
News & Weather Updates
delivered via email
You Cast
Submit Your Pics
and Video
What's on 6
Your Guide to NBC
& WOWT Programming
Safe Haven Age Limit Proposals Vary Save Email Print
Public hearing Monday afternoon
Posted: 10:31 AM Nov 17, 2008
Last Updated: 9:23 PM Nov 17, 2008
Reporter: John Chapman
Email Address: sixonline@wowt.com

A | A | A

The list of age limits Nebraska lawmakers will consider to stop rampant use of the state's open-ended Safe Haven Law now includes 30 days.

State Sen. Chris Langemeier of Schuyler said Monday Gov. Dave Heineman's proposal of three days could leave babies at risk. "Everything that goes along with being a new parent hasn't set in yet," said Langemeier.

His amendment to Heineman's bill will compete with another introduced on Saturday that would cap the age at one year. Other amendments are expected to be introduced, including one calling for a four-month age limit.

The governor says he's flexible on an age limit and would support an age limit up to 30 days old. The Legislature will begin debating Heinemann's bill on Tuesday and could amend it so it has an age limit other than 30 days.

Nebraska's Safe Haven Law currently has no age limit and has led to the drop-off of 34 children since the law took effect in July, many of them preteens and teenagers.

A public hearing was scheduled for Monday afternoon in the special session of the Nebraska Legislature that began last Friday. Forty of the 49 state senators have indicated they support a change to the law that will make it apply specifically to infants.

A final vote could come Friday. Gov. Heineman will have five days to sign a bill, veto it or let it become law without his signature.

Demonstrators gathered Monday on the steps of the Capitol, calling for more emergency services for families in crisis. It's something they say is desprately needed, yet won't be addressed during the current debate.

More Stories
Salvation Army Tree of Lights Reaches Goal

Double-Murder Suspect Arrested At Boys Town

Infant Seriously Hurt, Father Arrested

Welch Out of the Mayor's Race

High Court Refuses to Hear Custody Case

Bill Bans Smoking in Car with Children

Bill Would Make Lethal Injection Execution Choice for NE

Crews Respond to Apartment Fire in Bellevue

Post Your Comments
First Name:
Location:
Enter Comments: characters left
Email (optional):
Email will not be displayed on site. For station contact purpose only.
Read Comments
Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
Posted by: To Nicole on Nov 19, 2008 at 08:10 AM
Nicole, If we don't have this law, unwanted babies get abandoned in garbage cans and other unsafe places. It's senseless but it happens and our state needs to have a safe haven for these babies.

Posted by: nicole on Nov 18, 2008 at 10:56 AM
i think its ridiculous to even have to this law..we should just get rid of it al togther

Posted by: angelofdesteny7 on Nov 18, 2008 at 10:14 AM
I think that the age limit should be set to 1 year, but also if parents with older children need help they should be given the help they need. Most of the kids that have been dropped off were dropped off because the parents couldn't get the help they needed and it was the only thing they could do.

Posted by: TJ on Nov 18, 2008 at 09:31 AM
This is a clear example of how our law makers couldnt change a lightbulb. Make it as close to the same age as other states. Samey Same, I concur. The law makers make laws with so many holes.

Posted by: Samey Same on Nov 18, 2008 at 08:18 AM
It's insane to have an age limit higher than the highest age limit for any of our surrounding states. Think about it.

Posted by: Vickie on Nov 18, 2008 at 05:41 AM
3 days is ridiculous. I believe one year is reasonable and also a resident of NE.

Posted by: D on Nov 17, 2008 at 11:34 PM
Maybe if the state "licensed" parents this wouldn't be such a problem. If you can't afford them, know how to raise and care for a child you shouldn't have any. Why should the state have to raise, pay for, & care for "YOUR" kids?

Posted by: Murray on Nov 17, 2008 at 11:28 PM
Perhaps this time some of the senators, and perhaps the governor will actually "READ" the legislation before it is passed and signed this time.

Posted by: M V on Nov 17, 2008 at 10:28 PM
father of two.one year is good that way .just maybe the little ones dont remember being left ...

Posted by: Anonymous on Nov 17, 2008 at 09:13 PM
i think one year is very sufficent. it saddens me to hear of these babies being shaken that are under a year old. but thing of it is they wont be able to please everyone and protect all the children... still sad.

Posted by: jj on Nov 17, 2008 at 03:34 PM
one (1) year makes sense,but i feel for the older children that no one seems to want,what is to become of them? and once the child is left the parent should have no right to get it back.

Posted by: LLR on Nov 17, 2008 at 02:13 PM
I think 30 days would be sufficient for someone to decide they are not cut out to be a parent. But a year makes sense, too...I think they would like to go with the 3-day limit as submitted because then there would be no chance of people just dropping off toddlers because they were tired of them. But at least 1-year old isn't old enough to be a "problem" like so many of these teens we saw dropped off. Surely somewhere between 3 days and one year they can find a compromise...

Posted by: C on Nov 17, 2008 at 01:36 PM
OK, so what do these lawmakers propose we do with all the teenagers that have been dropped off? Clearly there's an issue that's not being dealt with. Obviously dropping them off at hospitals is not the answer, but what would happen to these kids otherwise??

Posted by: BJ on Nov 17, 2008 at 01:19 PM
One year makes sense!

Posted by: R on Nov 17, 2008 at 12:57 PM
Capping it at a year sounds very reasonable. You hear about 4, 6, 9 month olds being shaken all too often. Let's save these children from death or a lifetime with a severe disability. A child a year or younger also has a much higher chance of being adopted.

Posted by: CS on Nov 17, 2008 at 12:54 PM
I agree that 3 days doesn't seem long enough. I would opt for the 1 year deadline myself.

Posted by: b on Nov 17, 2008 at 11:11 AM
They need to change it so babies up to 1 year can be dropped off. If they change it to 3 days the moms are just getting out of the hospital. Usually the hospital stay is anywhere from 2-4 days

AP Online Network
YOU CAST - YOUR PICS N VIDEOS
Media Partners