Home  ·   News  ·   Weather  ·   Sports  ·   Jobs  ·   Community  ·   Pics N Videos  ·   Station  ·   Marketplace  ·   6 on Your Side  ·   Contests  ·   Get Connected  ·   Blogs
Health Check · Lottery · DTV · Seasonal · Mom to Mom · Traffic · The Omaha Buzz · CityCAMS · My Weather · School Closings · HS Cribs · Restaurants · McKnight Investigates
WOWT.com on Demand
6 On Your Cell
News, Sports & Weather
Information On Your Cell
Text ALERTS
Breaking News Alerts
Direct to Your Cell Phone
Daily e-News
News & Weather Updates
delivered via email
You Cast
Submit Your Pics
and Video
What's on 6
Your Guide to NBC
& WOWT Programming
Chambers Wants Special Session For Safe Haven Save Email Print
Agencies say real problem is lack of state services
Posted: 1:43 PM Oct 10, 2008
Last Updated: 2:17 PM Oct 11, 2008
Reporter: Jodi Baker
Email Address: sixonline@wowt.com

A | A | A

Sen. Ernie Chambers called on Gov. Heineman and other state lawmakers Friday to convene a special session of the Nebraska Legislature to fix what he calls a "worsening situation," the turmoil created by the Safe Haven Law.

Its intent was to keep troubled mothers from leaving newborns for dead. Its author allowed for a broader age limit to get it passed.

"There needs to be somewhere so that these people who need help can go,” said Sen. Arnie Stuthman of Platte Center, who knew older children could be dropped off, but never expected so many.

Sen. Chambers says a special session is needed to protect others. "It could be a life-scarring experience and I want to bring that to a stop." Due to term limits, Sen. Chambers will not return to the Legislature in January.

Since taking effect in July, nearly 20 children have been left at Nebraska hospitals. Many of them have been children in their mid-to-upper teens. Nebraska was the last of the 50 states to enact a Safe Haven Law. In other states, those laws most often are intended for the protection of newborns or children under the age of one.

Nebraska lawmakers did not include an age limit so any child up to the age of 19 can be dropped off, and the parent or guardian is free of any prosecution.

Sen. Chambers has suggested setting a limit of three days old, but has opposed any Safe Haven Law from the start. So too has Voices For Children.

"We think it's illuminating many larger problems that families have that are actually driving them to abandon their children because they don't feel they can get services they need,” says Kathy Bigsby Moore with Voices For Children.

She says the state's services, especially for mental health, are woefully inadequate and that's where lawmakers should focus. "I think the debate needs to be so much broader than the age of a child under the Safe Haven Law and I think that's best served during the 2009 full session."

For the moment, Sen. Stuthman is also against a special session. "But I think we need to wait a couple weeks before we make that decision and see how many additional kids are dropped off at a hospital, especially if we would have a lot more from other states."

Ultimately, the decision rests with Gov. Heineman. "My preference and my hope is that we don't have a special session, but it might be necessary."

The Child Saving Institute's president and CEO says Safe Haven should be limited to infants, but the law fails to address the need for more resources for struggling families before parents reach their breaking point.

Gov. Heineman says awareness of existing resources is a problem and he urges parents who need help to call The United Way at 211 or the Boys Town hotline at 1-800-448-3000.

  • Chambers' Letter

  • More Stories
    Bank Robbery

    Senators Back To Work In Lincoln

    Attempted Armed Robbery

    Pre-teen Burglars ?

    Parking Rage Incident

    Elderly Syracuse Woman Dies in Crash

    Flag Theft Arrest

    Bible Stolen From Car

    Post Your Comments
    First Name:
    Location:
    Enter Comments: characters left
    Email (optional):
    Email will not be displayed on site. For station contact purpose only.
    Read Comments
    Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
    Posted by: melody on Nov 3, 2008 at 04:15 PM
    This bill was passed to save babies from the trash can.Now they are saving not just babies,but all children from the trash can. What needs fixing?

    Posted by: D on Oct 13, 2008 at 05:09 PM
    So if Ernie changes the safe haven age limit to three days, how does this law protect unwanted and neglected two-year-olds and three-year-olds and on and on....A newborn is not as difficult to tend to than a child in his/her "terrible twos." The most important aspect of this law is the safety and welfare of children.

    Posted by: Sid on Oct 12, 2008 at 04:58 PM
    While I agree with Senator Chambers, I facetiously suggest that people have a license to reproduce. The book "1984" has some solutions, but the ACLU would be in like a hurricane if we tried licensing. However, some of these kids are really mentally ill and need services that are not available at the time. A few years ago I knew of a young adolescent girl who had been hospitalized in a psychiatric unit for three months. When she was released to go home, that evening she called the front desk at the unit asking someone to come get her. Her mother to whom she had been released had gone out partying for the night, leaving her alone. What a poor excuse for a mother. Some people should just not have kids, period. Senator Chambers is usually thoughtful and articulate (I once heard him say the word kindergarten as kin-der-gar-ten, while the woman he was debating in Lincoln said Kinny-garden. His point was excellent)

    Posted by: M on Oct 12, 2008 at 05:09 AM
    Looks like Ernie Chambers should spend some time working with the State of Nebrasks's CPS - perhaps he could see Shaken Babies (> 3 days old) and maybe change his mind when he realizes how many cases there are.

    Posted by: for the babies on Oct 12, 2008 at 02:41 AM
    chambers is right, but the age is suggesting is wrong!! Limiting it to babies under 3 days old will not stop all of the child abuse that happens later than that. how many times do we hear about shaken and beaten babies from 3 -9 months old...perhaps the hospitals that get these babies needs to send their stats to the legislature...or i'm sure that would violate hipa laws

    Posted by: S on Oct 11, 2008 at 05:58 PM
    Oh my gosh! I can't believe I agree with Sen. Chambers!

    Posted by: Mark on Oct 11, 2008 at 09:38 AM
    While this bill may need some tweaking, it does not need a special session. These kids that are being dropped off are probably in the right spot. If a parent can actually abandon their child at a hospital they probably have no business raising that child, regardless of age. It's a mess for society to clean up for the "parents" but it's not the childs fault and hopefully something good can come of it.

    Posted by: eselte on Oct 11, 2008 at 09:05 AM
    kudos to senator chambers for addressing this issue.

    Posted by: Proud Omahan on Oct 11, 2008 at 08:16 AM
    I'm old school, and in that school we call people like Ernie Chambers downright crazy. In principal he's a master at the legal system of Nebraska, in reality he is downright mean. He's no longer an elected official in our legislature so go back to cutting hair.

    Posted by: Tom on Oct 11, 2008 at 04:25 AM
    LEAVE THE BILL ALONE!! I'd rather see a child in the saftey of a foster home than beat to death or starved or possibly left to the hands of a child molester.

    Posted by: A on Oct 11, 2008 at 01:39 AM
    Hey Ernie, it's all the Christian god's fault. Better try suing it again.. *mocking laughter*

    Posted by: D on Oct 10, 2008 at 11:57 PM
    And while they are meeting to fix this mess, they can take care of that idiotic law Chambers pushed & passed making police & cities liable for criminals fleeing police.

    Posted by: Keith on Oct 10, 2008 at 10:50 PM
    "Its intent was to keep troubled mothers from leaving newborns for dead." Yet Ernie opposes it. That's because Ernie supports the option of killing children before they're newborns. What an irony! The fight for legalized abortion was initiated by a woman who wanted to eliminate "undesirable elements" (e.g. African Americans) from society. And Ernie, the man who thinks for himself, goes along with the plan. Yes, a Safe Haven Law is legalized abandonment, but abortion is legalized murder.

    Posted by: LLR on Oct 10, 2008 at 10:38 PM
    This is the second time in my life I've agreed with Ernie. WE looked like IDIOTS on the national news the other day. WE NEED a special session to fix this. I don't care what it costs, if we've had 17 teens dropped off in two months, think of the cost by January. MY tax dollars, YOUR tax dollars. A special session will cost less. UNFORTUNATELY we will be dealing with the same morons who passed this bill in the first place. Stuthman is a TOTAL moron, we need to vote OUT the incumbents and start fresh in January.

    Posted by: jenny on Oct 10, 2008 at 10:13 PM
    Isn't the reason this bill reads the way it does because Ernie Chambers was trying to prove a point? And now when people have actually used the ridiculous law the joke is up? The point proved is that there are plenty of people out there who need resources and are unable to locate them. This law doesn't save babies from trash cans because people who do that aren't looking for resources there is something else fundamentally wrong with them. The people who dropped these children off are probably people who have not been able to find other methods of solving what are probably very real problems if Ernie was smart - he'd quit trying to prove points and start trying to point people to resources.

    Posted by: ? on Oct 10, 2008 at 08:21 PM
    Since when does money mean more than the safety of a child of any age? I would rather have my tax money go to this than some other dumb thing this state comes up with. Shame on all of you for thinking a child is not worth the cost. The way you all make it sound, the kid should just be negelected (no food, no parental supervision) or abused because we don't want to pay for it.

    Posted by: J on Oct 10, 2008 at 06:04 PM
    it'll cost MORE for the tax payers to NOT have a special session. For instance, just this incident with the council bluffs girl cost the state 10K bucks in time, resources, and services. Now...imagine that number multiplied by thousands and thousands of children. That is how many will be dropped off before this is resolved. And that financial number is just on a weekend getting things set up. Perminent placement will cost MILLIONS. Then again, nebraska appears to enjoy being one of the higher tax paying states. Where do you think they will get this money? taxes.

    Posted by: mTm on Oct 10, 2008 at 05:20 PM
    I never believed this like cats barking. I agree with Ernie

    Posted by: State stinks on Oct 10, 2008 at 04:53 PM
    The State officials and many people living in this state are just terrible. This should not be amended and there will be more issues with these kids other than abandonment if this law is changed. Shame on the people of Nebraska and the dumb comments that they make

    Posted by: Jeremy on Oct 10, 2008 at 04:38 PM
    Finally, Sen Chambers does something right!!! It is about time they get this resolved..

    Posted by: Ben on Oct 10, 2008 at 04:24 PM
    I think this is the first time EVER that I agree with Senator Chambers.

    Posted by: About time on Oct 10, 2008 at 04:12 PM
    is nobody going to slam crazy ernie now? he is a great leader who sometimes takes his points a little to far (like suing God to show that anyone has the RIGHT to sue anyone in our great country, if you do not like that than you need to move to Spain.)

    Posted by: joe on Oct 10, 2008 at 04:12 PM
    Hey Ernie... What about all the women and kids abandoned in your district by uncaring fathers? Do you really care, or is this just another way to get your sorry name in the press again?

    Posted by: Anonymous on Oct 10, 2008 at 03:36 PM
    we don't know that some of these kids might not have actually been relieved to be dropped off, or that its not in their better interest (consider the 9 that were living among their feces).

    Posted by: Ken on Oct 10, 2008 at 03:06 PM
    It is time for Ernie to just "Cut Hair" and leave the polotics to professionals.

    Posted by: cecd on Oct 10, 2008 at 02:49 PM
    Hasn't he retired? BUTTing in...I guess it is a hard habit to break...being Godlike and all. Ernie...move to Florida...become a snowbird...PLEASE. Leave this mess for everyone else to clean up. They can take it from here.

    Posted by: No Way on Oct 10, 2008 at 02:24 PM
    Oh hell no, we can wait till the regular session. It'd be an enormous waste of money, and we don't want to give these term-limited dinosaurs like Chambers another crack at legislation. The legislature made their bed; let them wallow there for a few months!

    Posted by: Proud To Be Mexican on Oct 10, 2008 at 02:17 PM
    Once again, right or wrong, it takes Ernie Chambers to save our state from total embarassment and being the nations laughing stock. I wonder what we are going to do when he's gone?

    Posted by: one last time on Oct 10, 2008 at 01:58 PM
    he just wants to try to do something one last time before his time is up. give it up ernie your out!

    AP Online Network
    YOU CAST - YOUR PICS N VIDEOS
    Media Partners