Home  ·   News  ·   Weather  ·   Sports  ·   Jobs  ·   Community  ·   Pics N Videos  ·   Station  ·   Marketplace  ·   6 on Your Side  ·   Contests  ·   Get Connected  ·   Blogs
Health Check · Lottery · DTV · Seasonal · Mom to Mom · Traffic · The Omaha Buzz · CityCAMS · My Weather · School Closings · HS Cribs · Restaurants · McKnight Investigates
WOWT.com on Demand
6 On Your Cell
News, Sports & Weather
Information On Your Cell
Text ALERTS
Breaking News Alerts
Direct to Your Cell Phone
Daily e-News
News & Weather Updates
delivered via email
You Cast
Submit Your Pics
and Video
What's on 6
Your Guide to NBC
& WOWT Programming
Noxious Weeds Causing Problems in Nebraska Rivers Save Email Print
May Cause Ice Jams Later This Year
Posted: 4:48 PM Sep 23, 2008
Last Updated: 6:16 PM Sep 23, 2008
Email Address: sixonline@wowt.com

A | A | A

Years of drought throughout Nebraska has created a problem that is starting to take over the Platte River.

Dense vegetation on sandbars caused by non-native weeds --- phragmites and purple loose strife coupled with trees --- is plugging the river.

It affects wildlife, recreation and the flow of the Platte River itself.

It's so dense you can't even walk through it.

"It creates a dense thick mat and it sucks up a lot of water...it crowds out all native vegetation," said Douglas County Weed Control Officer Mike Reed.

“The Phragmites can clog the river and we are very concerned particularly in the Valley to Fremont area where we have the potential for some ice jam flooding," said Rich Tesar of the Papio-Missouri River Natural Resources District.

Gayann Henn is concerned about potential ice jams later this year.

"With all the trees on the sandbar there's nowhere for that ice to flow," she said.

So the natural resource district is calling in an air strike.

The dense foliage from Fremont to the Missouri River will be sprayed by helicopter.

The weed grows fast --- 10 inches a day.

An herbicide called habitat will be sprayed to kill it.

"I don't think agencies like the NRD would use chemicals that would harm anybody or animals.” Gayann Henn said. “I have no problem with it at all."

The Environmental Protection Agency said the aquatic herbicide is safe for fish, animals and humans.

The cost for spraying is $150 an acre. Landowners along the river will pay two-thirds of that bill.

More Stories
Senators Back To Work In Lincoln

Attempted Armed Robbery

Pre-teen Burglars ?

Lawsuit Filed Over Teddy Bear Spying

Eligible For Parole After One-Year On 10th DWI

Pension Spiking Revealed Again

Hearing Held In Attempted Murder Case

Parking Rage Incident

Post Your Comments
First Name:
Location:
Enter Comments: characters left
Email (optional):
Email will not be displayed on site. For station contact purpose only.
Read Comments
Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
Posted by: John on Sep 26, 2008 at 08:35 AM
Actually the excess weeds choking our water ways, area lakes and ponds are not caused totally by nature. The excess weeds are caused by nitrates in the water. Which come from animal fertilizer and human body waste in the water table. Nitrates are the most common form of colon cancer in the U.S. The E.P.A. should do something about the nitrate level in our water, instead of the lazy, and more importantly dangerous way of dealing with the problem. Adding more poison to the water. Duh. I can't believe I have to explain these things

Posted by: Kent on Sep 25, 2008 at 10:00 AM
RM - how do you defend your allegation that weeds don't grow naturally in nature?

Posted by: Keith on Sep 25, 2008 at 01:28 AM
RM, are you saying the weeds shouldn't be here, because they have no "control"? You're thinking backwards. The weeds are here precisely because they have no "control". THAT'S NATURE! Can you grasp that concept? So what if the weeds are "non native"? If a natural process brought them here, that's just nature. And if nature is allowed to progress, what we call weeds will be the dominant plants in the river, naturally. We call them "non native" today, but we might be calling them "native" in 20 years. On the other hand, spraying herbicide definitely isn't a natural process. If we spray the weeds, we will restore the native plants, unnaturally. To summarize: you are wrong. Letting these weeds grow is nature occurring naturally, while committing herbicide against them is not nature occurring naturally. You just say the weeds are not here naturally, because you don’t want them here. But your desire doesn’t change the fact that they are here, naturally.

Posted by: RM on Sep 24, 2008 at 03:13 PM
Sorry Keith but this isn't nature occurring naturally. Both are non native plants that naturally would have some other kind of control but these don't when out of there natural environment. Will goats eat these plants?

Posted by: Anonymous on Sep 24, 2008 at 02:35 PM
John, it only creates a small tic in people and animals. That's safe enough, isn't it ;)

Posted by: Keith on Sep 24, 2008 at 10:34 AM
It's called "nature", people! It's ironic how we worship nature for giving us the Platte River, but we won't let nature continue naturally. We have to stop the natural progression and return things to the way they were.

Posted by: Peg on Sep 24, 2008 at 09:37 AM
Did anyone ask the landowners if the want it sprayed?

Posted by: Chris on Sep 23, 2008 at 11:35 PM
Our schools teach evolution, but we don't really believe it. If we really believed in evolution, we wouldn't stop the more "fit" weeds, so that the "weak" native vegetation can grow.

Posted by: John on Sep 23, 2008 at 05:02 PM
This has to be one of the dumbest things I've ever heard. Have you seen the oil and garbage in the Big Mo? There's no way in heck (not my first choice of words) that a herbicide is safe for the enviroment or people. They should change the name of the EPA to the Enviromental Destruction Agency.

AP Online Network
YOU CAST - YOUR PICS N VIDEOS
Media Partners