Home  ·   News  ·   Weather  ·   Sports  ·   Jobs  ·   Community  ·   Pics N Videos  ·   Station  ·   Marketplace  ·   6 on Your Side  ·   Contests  ·   Get Connected  ·   Blogs
Health Check · Lottery · DTV · Seasonal · Mom to Mom · Traffic · The Omaha Buzz · CityCAMS · My Weather · School Closings · HS Cribs · Restaurants · McKnight Investigates
WOWT.com on Demand
6 On Your Cell
News, Sports & Weather
Information On Your Cell
Text ALERTS
Breaking News Alerts
Direct to Your Cell Phone
Daily e-News
News & Weather Updates
delivered via email
You Cast
Submit Your Pics
and Video
What's on 6
Your Guide to NBC
& WOWT Programming
Children Left at Hospital Under Safe Haven Law Save Email Print
Reporter: Associated Press
Email Address:

A | A | A

Boys ages 15 and 11 have been left at area hospitals and were believed to be the first to be left under the protections of Nebraska's new safe-haven law.

A 44-year-old woman dropped off her teenage nephew at Lincoln's BryanLGH Medical Center West on Saturday, saying the boy had behavioral problems that she couldn't handle anymore, Lincoln Police Chief Tom Casady said. The woman is the boy's legal guardian.

The exchange occurred without incident, said Casady, who has turned the case over to the state Department of Health and Human Services. The boy was placed in temporary protective custody.

Hospital spokeswoman Peg Aschwege, citing a need to protect confidentiality, would confirm only that it was the first case the hospital has handled since the law went into effect and that established procedures were followed. She declined to discuss any details.

The other boy was left at Immanuel Medical Center in Omaha on Saturday, said Alegent Health spokeswoman Kelly Grinnell.

HHS identified that child only as an 11-year-old boy. A parent dropped the child off, saying she believed she could no longer care for him, said Todd Landry, director of HHS' division of Children and Family Services.

The cases are the first uses of the state's safe-haven law, Landry said.

Neither case produced suspicion of child abuse or neglect and neither child appeared to be in immediate danger, he said.

"These were two cases where the caregiver or parent decided the behavior issues were such they felt they could no longer provide good parenting skills," Landry said.

The 11-year-old remained in an Omaha hospital for evaluation and observation Monday, he said. The 15-year-old has been placed temporarily in an emergency shelter in Lincoln. The county attorneys and the courts will now step in to determine custody.

Both boys are believed to be doing reasonably well, Landry said.

Nebraska was the last state in the nation to adopt a safe-haven law, which took effect July 18. It allows anyone, not just a parent, to leave a child at any state-licensed hospital without fear of prosecution.

Under previous law, a parent who abandoned a baby could have been charged with child neglect or abandonment, both misdemeanors, or child abuse, a felony.

State Sen. Arnie Stuthman said he introduced the bill intending to protect infants. In a compromise with senators worried about arbitrary age limits, the measure was expanded to include the word "child."

The law doesn't further define child, and some have interpreted that to mean anyone in Nebraska under the age of 19. Others have taken the common law meaning of child -- those under age 14.

The law also isn't intended to absolve someone of child-abuse charges.

Most other states have focused their laws on protecting infants.

Stuthman said Monday he found it surprising the state would see two cases on the same day and unusual that they were older children.

"This is a situation that I felt could possibly be coming," he said of older children being left. "I didn't realize it would happen this quick."

Though the cases didn't meet the intent of his bill, he offered no regrets. They will open lawmakers' eyes as to the issues affecting children and families, Stuthman said.

He said he remains open to revisiting the law.

Stuthman's bill was signed into law as a way of protecting children from immediate danger or harm, said Landry, who didn't believe the two cases carried that sense of urgency.

"I clearly do not believe this was the intent of LB157," he said.

The department will continue to evaluate the situation and work closely with the Legislature to determine what, if any, changes are needed to the safe-haven measure, he said.

Landry and Stuthman urged those struggling with their children and behavioral issues to seek out community resources including the United Way's 211 service before using the provisions of the safe-haven law.

Information and referrals are also available at any local HHS office, Landry said.

More Stories
Senators Back To Work In Lincoln

Pre-teen Burglars ?

Attempted Armed Robbery

Lawsuit Filed Over Teddy Bear Spying

Eligible For Parole After One-Year On 10th DWI

Pension Spiking Revealed Again

Hearing Held In Attempted Murder Case

Parking Rage Incident

Post Your Comments
First Name:
Location:
Enter Comments: characters left
Email (optional):
Email will not be displayed on site. For station contact purpose only.
Read Comments
Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
Posted by: Charlie on Sep 20, 2008 at 11:17 AM
Nebraska's law on this is jacked up. It needs to be more like Iowa's, which says that any child can be turned over with no questions asked if it is believed that the child is no older than 14 days. So if a new young mom or anyone has a baby they have 14 days to make the decision on whether or not they keep that child.

Posted by: lc on Sep 19, 2008 at 06:33 PM
you know what?? afyer 11 years, afyer 15 , you have tried just about everything. If you can't do it, you just can't do it...for whatever reason. It's better than abusing them. Isn't that what this law is about?? Helping the child be in a good place? For Gods sake people. Make up your minds. What's the problem?? Their age? At least the adults tried.

Posted by: To Dan on Sep 19, 2008 at 02:43 PM
maybe you should reread the post because it says in there the law is a NO QUESTIONS ASKED thing so how could they be interviewed and convicted? And with this law you can't have a child abandonment law because the law states you can drop the children off at a hospital again NO QUESTIONS ASKED

Posted by: Gloria on Sep 19, 2008 at 10:29 AM
Wonder how they could get a 19 year old guy into a hospital? When kids age out of the foster care system, they are out. Period. Some can't take care of themselves and cause problems. Maybe this system will provide some attention to these kids that the caregivers could not get. Life is really tough when you have a monster child in the household. Some of the sanctimonious comments here aren't tuned in to what these people go through. I hope some good can come of this situation.

Posted by: Savannah on Sep 18, 2008 at 11:22 PM
I say " Congratulation to the parents of these children and putting them 1st to get the help they need and admiting you cant or dont want to provide the care they need" At least in a case of some one I know. the kids dont have to live with a child porn Daddy who is guilty of much more then that" and know one would take them out of the home dispite Daddy being caught! they would benifit from this law and help.

Posted by: kristie on Sep 18, 2008 at 05:11 PM
my friend had a son who was a mess. he hurt her and his sibblings. the system you all favor would do nothing. she lived in constant fear. he went out and robbed people, was arrested multi time. she was taken to court many times by other parents. who would help her... no one. if this law was in effect while she was alive mabye she would still be here. he killed her and his younger sister and and younger brother. so before you all go off about how the parent or aunt are such horrible people you need to go fix the system and laws to help people like this

Posted by: Dan on Sep 18, 2008 at 04:08 PM
How can you just drop off a child in your custody? The parents and guardians need to be interviewed and convicted if necessary. With this law should be a law for child abandonment. I do not know these kids but a lot of kids at these ages are carrying guns and robbing people and burglarizing homes. Hopefully this is not the case. As far as sending them to foster homes, what a joke. Get these kids back home. I believe that most foster homes are doing it for the paycheck. It is not about love. It is about greed. I didn't read anything about these childrens fathers. Where are they. Hopefully they will come out of the woodwork and take their kids away from these give ups. (like that will happen). How old was the mother? Is she getting help from goverment? Is she divorced or never married? Does the kid have a record?Does the mom have a record? These are the ?'s that need to be answered. THese kids will be taken to hospitals for asylum if this keeps up. Don't need that at all.

Posted by: Erin on Sep 18, 2008 at 02:00 PM
CPS - you say these kids will have a good place to live now...how can you be so sure...take the case of the 4 & 6 yr old girls that were repeatedly sexually abused by the 10 & 11 yr old boys while in foster care. The foster care system isn't utopia for a child either...

Posted by: Chris on Sep 18, 2008 at 12:45 PM
You know, I agree with most of the people that this is a tragic event that happened. And we dont know the what really happened with these two boys and their familys, but maybe the Guardians just lost their jobs and have been trying to take care of these two and are now to a point where if they didn't do this that they all would end up on the streets with nothing and no where to sleep/live. I don't have any children and right now in my life I am greatful that I don't. I was Medically discharged from the Army and looked everyday for a job in two different states and I was out of a job for a year. I lost my house, my credit is shot, and I was very close to losing everything that I had. I know it would have ripped my heart out if I would have had kids and HAD to do the same thing.

Posted by: To Single Mom... on Sep 18, 2008 at 11:28 AM
...though you words are encouraging, your FACTS are way off base - these 2 boys were not from the SAME family - so I rather doubt that this particular 11 year old boy "looked up" to this particular 15 year old boy.

Posted by: C on Sep 17, 2008 at 07:32 PM
Gen - I did read your post. Your words were: "maybe some people can afford to have children,and then something tragic happens with the economy, or say, they get injured and can no longer work... then walk in some of these parents shoes for awhile and see what it is like to all of a sudden, and unexpectedly, loose your job and no longer be able to provide for your family.." It's easy for one to interpret that you used these as possible excuses given the subject of the article. Maybe your response should have been worded differently.

Posted by: Mr Right Now on Sep 17, 2008 at 03:18 PM
So, you can keep the kids around, until what they cost you exceeds what they get you in government handout checks (AFDC, Section 8, Food Stamps, etc etc etc). When they become a financial or lifestyle impediment (like making it harder to meet "Mr. Right Now"), you can just go dump them at a hospital.

Posted by: Gen on Sep 17, 2008 at 02:29 PM
and by the way, C, no where did i mention anything about anyone getting rid of their kids due to personal economic difficulty.Read the post.

Posted by: Gen on Sep 17, 2008 at 02:25 PM
to C, Yes, I have children, and i, personally, would not dump my children off on anyone. I have had it very difficult, and I fight for every needed thing my sons need. I do not take NO as an answer to their needed care. In fact, my older son has aspergers, and I have not abandoned him. It is the school system and health system that has failed him and abandoned him. I have fought more for my son than that average parent. Thanks to my not giving up on him, like everyone else has, he is doing alot better with everything.

Posted by: Until it happens to you on Sep 17, 2008 at 01:50 PM
You people have no clue. If you have a child that is out of control you do not have many options... and I am not taking about misbehaving... I am talking, not coming home, not listening, breaking the law, those types of issues. If you discipline your children the police come and take you (and your other children) and then there is a court process that you must go through that last what seems like forever, and that is beside the $$ it will cost. (The system is for the criminals.) Getting help?? from who??? You are responsible for your children and there actions until they are of age... which means you can be arrested and charged for there criminal behavior. So until you have walked even three feet in these parent/ aunts shoes... you are clueless!!!! I am sure they did not just give up on these children for no reason... they had to be at the end of there rope.

Posted by: To To Dave on Sep 17, 2008 at 11:20 AM
In these days and times, having children is not a privilege, it is a curse.

Posted by: Anonymous on Sep 17, 2008 at 09:22 AM
Response to J. Does it really matter what the 15 and 11 year olds told the cops? I'm sure the conversation probably went something like - OMG I'm such and angel, I don't do anything wrong, and I have no idea why my parents (and Aunt) are doing this to me...Like you really have to believe me.... What the cops and the hospital should have said is...get a life, and grow up. The world doesn't really care what you think.

Posted by: Anonymous on Sep 17, 2008 at 03:29 AM
The foster care system is no walk in the park for the kids either. I remember my 3 nieces in foster care in another state and they had so many family members from across the nation come out of the woodwork to take them in that the state they lived in got scared and said they could only stay in that state! Some children turn out fine, while others turn out horrible. There are too many children in the system now. Our tax dollars just can't handle it anymore. When my own child turned 18, it was "time to get a job," and they did. My thing is make the child feel like they're contributing and that they are important to you and that you care. Even in the bad times, I could never bring myself to drop them off somewhere and never look back. I felt that would cost me my own soul.

Posted by: Sally on Sep 16, 2008 at 09:57 PM
Remember that the older boy was not with a parent - the parent was already out of the picture. We don't know the situation of the 11 year old but probably he knew he was a problem for his mother. My boys used to fight and argue so much that I threatened to leave them outside until they could talk civilly. Kids are all different, and this 11 year old probably knew which buttons to push to get a reaction out of his mother. It sounds like there will be evaluations and determinations for the best handling of the kids.

Posted by: To S on Sep 16, 2008 at 08:06 PM
Whats wrong with us? Whats wrong with you. You liberals never cease to amaze me! What ever happened to a thing called being a responsible parent!!!! No, lets make a law to where parents can say, Ok I've had enough, I can't take it any more. I'm throwing you away! Ya, real smart thinking there!!!!

Posted by: C on Sep 16, 2008 at 07:16 PM
Hey Gen - Clearly you're not a parent. Loss of employment and the economy are really crappy excuses to get rid of your kids. Not a single person I know would throw their kids away b/c of loss of employment, the economy or an injury. Anyone who could justify these as events as excusable are pathetic excuses for parents. My mother raised two children alone with not a single bit of state assistance. She worked 2 and sometimes 3 jobs to keep a roof over our head, clothes on our back, food in our mouths. And let me tell you - my sister was a pain in the butt. She got kicked out of a number of schools for behavior related issues and clearly had some mental health issues. Both of us are here today to talk about it and my mom didn't dump either of us off at a hospital or anywhere else to lighten her load. Grow the heck up or don't take on the responsibility of children. Children are lifes precious gifts - not throwaways when life doesn't go exactly as you plan. Educate yourself people.

Posted by: j on Sep 16, 2008 at 05:33 PM
omg thats scary! 15 & 11 yr. olds! dont you think they would have told something to the cops!! kids these days know more than adults!! like duh...XD

Posted by: L on Sep 16, 2008 at 05:24 PM
The mental health system in Nebraska is horrible for all. They need help. Who will help these people? Interview the Psychiatrists.

Posted by: D on Sep 16, 2008 at 04:35 PM
I'm sure this was a last resort for the parents and Aunt. Remember, you can't discipline your children, or CPS will come after you for abuse. Remember that kids today know just exactly how to work the system, and have become very good at it. To be honest, I'm glad the parents took them to the hospital instead of the kid walking out of the house and ending up on the street. These people have multiple storie, and I'm sure the children aren't angels...

Posted by: Anonymous on Sep 16, 2008 at 03:40 PM
I don't agree with the parents that did this, but these bratty kids for the most part these days need to respect adults.

Posted by: A on Sep 16, 2008 at 03:02 PM
What kind of mother drops her child off like that? The poor boys...watching someone drop them off and walk out the door knowing they aren't loved enough. Maybe this isn't the first time they've been abandoned. I pray they are put in a loving, caring situation where they can heal from this devastation. And I pray the law is changed to exclude situations like this...the parents/guardians should not have this option for an older child and should be held accountable for such abandonment.

Posted by: Single Mom on Sep 16, 2008 at 02:56 PM
Hey Dave, Where I do believe that having a child is privilege. Not everyone is ready. I am a single mom and was not ready. But I did take on the responsibilty of my actions. AND NO I DO NOT get ANY help from the state or goverment. I work hard for my money! And maybe this mom/aunt was struggling because she didnt have help. I thank god that my childs father is still around! He is an awesome dad! And a great help! I hope these 2 boys can find some peace in the heart ache that they are feeling. Maybe the mom/aunt lost her job and could no longer care for the 2. A 15yr old eats ALOT!! And the 11 yr old probably looked up to him and tried doing everything he did! God bless those boys. And god bless this lady. After she did the right thing. She did not place them on the streets and run away. She took them to a safe place where they could get the help they need. Some of you are very cold hearted. And yes I DO spank my child when she does not listen. And guess what she stops after a few times!

Posted by: Sandi on Sep 16, 2008 at 02:50 PM
Oh, and my mom's kids(my self included DUH), were raised, not only Fearing GOD, but having the fear of disappointing our mother(and she was a single mother, 3 kids, 4 dogs and handicap). Kids now days, just don't get it. oh they can't get it, as they are taught at a very young age, by educators, if you are disciplined at home, and don't agree with it call 911!! I do agree that society needs better care for mental illness,. but i am a Psych degree, and i just don't buy all the ADD, and ADHD...Parents needs do to a better job of raising their children, less TV, less computer time, and more parenting time. Alot of times children act out because any attention from their caregivers is better that NONE!!! One last note on Nebraska, CPS in this state takes children 50% more than any other state in the nation and keeps them in foster homes 50% longer...You go GOOD LIFE

Posted by: Cynthia on Sep 16, 2008 at 02:43 PM
The law should pertain to newborn infants only! As the law stands now, it can give certain parents permission to "dispose" of their children. If it is determined that a parent can't care for their child, other long term options can be explored. Even making an adoption plan for an older child is less traumatic than dropping them off at a hospital. Newborns have the ability to bond and attach with new families and likely will not suffer the same negative effects of being left at a hospital.

Posted by: JRTM on Sep 16, 2008 at 02:29 PM
I am so glad those children are safe and will receive the care they deserve.

Posted by: T on Sep 16, 2008 at 02:22 PM
Next Weeks News Headline - "146 MORE CHILDREN LEFT IN NEBRASKA HOSPITALS" - this is going to turn into such a huge mess for the already burdened DHHS / foster care system. It is better for these kids to be "somewhere else" if their parents don't want to (or simply CAN'T) take care of them - but posting the "up to age 19" in the media is going to create an even bigger mess.

Posted by: Gen on Sep 16, 2008 at 02:18 PM
Hey,Dave. maybe some people can afford to have children,and then something tragic happens with the economy, or say, they get injured and can no longer work. Would you concider it the parents fault and tell them that they should have seen what was in the future. I bet many people, that have been layed off of jobs due to the ecomomy, wouln't have predicted it,say 10 years ago, when they decided to have children. If you want to play the blame game, then walk in some of these parents shoes for awhile and see what it is like to all of a sudden, and unexpectedly, loose your job and no longer be able to provide for your family, including very important and needed health insurance. Especially if your child has a severe mental health illness, and the insurances refuses to pay for need care.

Posted by: J fron Bennington on Sep 16, 2008 at 01:18 PM
After the Westroads shooting, I made it a point to read all the OWH articles about the state of Nebraska's mental health "system". People like Dave are part of the problem - thinking that better parenting will cure psychiatric disorders that may be rooted in hormononal imbalances or genetic predispositions. Such thinking creates a stigma in treating and funding mental health. "Just spank 'em, never hurt me none." You can't just spank away some of these problems. I truly feel sorry for people like these caregivers who found no other solution than to admit failure and give up their wards to the State. If you read about Hawkins and others like him, you may know how difficult it is to get the State to help. "Community resources"??? Sheri, who posted earlier today, told us all about "community resources". How about recognizing this as a tragedy for all involved, rather than heaping abuse on the guardians who did try to raise those kids, but couldn't?

Posted by: C on Sep 16, 2008 at 01:10 PM
I agree w/ most of the people here-these children will be scarred for life, having been dropped off and left at a hospital. However, there is no easy solution to this problem of frustrated caregivers (not necessarily family even) taking care of children w/ behavior or other problems. We can't say the law should end at age 2, because we all know there are parents out there who can't deal with their kids (any age) and end up hurting them. Wish there was an easy answer, but there's not.

Posted by: CS on Sep 16, 2008 at 12:26 PM
It's lazy abandonment if you ask me and those who don't see anything wrong with this are nuts. I was abandoned by my father at 12 years old. He just got up and walked out one day and I haven't seen him since. The affects of this kind of abandonment have left me with scars that I will have for the rest of my life. I can't imagine the scars that these kids will be left with for they way they have been abandoned. If you think they're bad now, wait until they're 30! There are so many resources that one could take advantage of in this community for help but to give up and throw someone away because you're not strong enough to handle them is just plain lazy and cruel.

Posted by: Andy on Sep 16, 2008 at 12:18 PM
People are naive if they did not see this coming. This is more an indictement of an inept Health and Human Services Division rather than a poorly written law. While I don't condone what the guardians of these children did, it is certainly understandable. Health and Human Services is non-existent when it comes to providing services for families in crisis. In many cases parents are forced to make their children wards of the state in order to access help and even then it is sparse at best. Now our legislators will spend thousands of hours debating how to modify this law, when their time should truly be spent re-vamping the entire Health and Human Services Department to actually put into place people and services that will beneift the citizens of Nebraska. The law is just a band-aid to a festering wound called Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services.

Posted by: concerned parent on Sep 16, 2008 at 12:18 PM
It bothers me that the parents/guardians could do this but we don't know the circumstances behind each situation.I think it's better to have the kids in a safe haven than running the streets and doing who knows what. Maybe these two kids are some of the ones that are out stealing, vandalizing, shooting each other, etc. and the parents know that they can't control them anymore. How do we know that it didn't tear them up to drop the kids off but they want what's best for the child?

Posted by: TO Dave on Sep 16, 2008 at 12:15 PM
Having a child is a privledge and not a right? The constitution talks about child bearing? WOW! That is news to me. Now you are saying they should run a credit check on parents to see if they can afford it? You are totally off your rocker.

Posted by: Sandra on Sep 16, 2008 at 11:50 AM
AMEN OFFICER,....the government, CPS, has made it impossible for a parent to discipline and teach their children. Notice i said "discipline"...as there is a difference between that and abuse.. Maybe is the government officials who think they can do better with our children, would back off, and give parents their rights back, our children and society would be alot better off. NEBRASKA, not the place to raise a family!!!!!! Look at the generation that was raised in the 70's,...i am sure where disiplined, and we are one of the most successful generations around....we GOT SPANKED!!! and nope sorry no self-esteem issues here....Yep, dictorship comes to mind??????

Posted by: M on Sep 16, 2008 at 11:29 AM
I have mixed emotions. This law is good thing, especially when looking back at the parents who put their babies in dumpsters and other places, but my heart is saddened for these 2 particular children. Imagine the rejection that 11 year old feels. His mommy doesn't want him anymore. I see want ads for foster parents all the time. We are really going to have an over population of state wards now. I am hoping more GOOD people will step up to be foster parents. Like I said, I feel bad for the kids, but maybe they are better off. I think sometimes for parents, life can get overwhelming and instead of abusing their kid or putting them through hell, this is another alternative. Just expressing a few of my concerns. I was wondering if the law is set a certain way where say in 2 years the parent wants their kid back. Will that be allowed?

Posted by: Anonymous on Sep 16, 2008 at 11:18 AM
we don't know the circumstances ... it may have been the adults who were in danger!

Posted by: Denise on Sep 16, 2008 at 10:57 AM
When this bill was signed into law, those of us that worked / work for DHHS KNEW that parents would begin dumping their kids because they "could not handle their beehaviors". Do we need to give parents that excuse to dump their kids like trash? Now we have given parents ammunition. They can use threats. I will just give you to the state and you can go into foster care. That's terrorism.

Posted by: K on Sep 16, 2008 at 10:57 AM
I don't think this is neccessarily a case of the children not being loved. As a parent, the ultimate sacrifice I could make would be to give up my child for their own benefit. It is a sad situation, however, my opinion is that it is out of absolute love and selflessness for a child that a parent would do this. Because they could not provide the care the child needed, they did something very difficult and gave the child to someone who could provide more.

Posted by: Dave on Sep 16, 2008 at 10:48 AM
Hey Gen...If they cant afford to have kids,then maybey they should not do what it takes to make a child?? I mean heck you have to prove financial responsibility to have a car..but not a child? NOWHERE in the constitution does it say you have the RIGHT to have a child..it is a PRIVLEDGE you need to be able to AFFORD or you don't do! PERIOD..END OF DISCUSSION!

Posted by: Sheri on Sep 16, 2008 at 10:42 AM
Yes, I believe that the Safe Haven Law is meant for newborns, but, I do understand the Aunt of the 15 year old and the 11 year old caregiver. Although, I would not abandon my 14 year old, that is mentally ill and "a great kid", the Nebraska Mental Health System has been failing us miserably! I'm a single, working mom, that is making to much money for insurance help and I can't afford insurance, so the bills keep piling up! My heart breaks for my son! I want so badly for him to get the help he needs! Unless you have dealt with the mental health system and have a child in need of help, you can't possibly understand! If your child has a physical illness the help is there, but, with mental illness, it is different, it is on-going... I have been going through the proper chanels to get help for my son, but "frustration", sums up my feelings! The Safe Haven Law is for new-borns but Nebraska needs better Mental Health HELP!

Posted by: to kb on Sep 16, 2008 at 10:20 AM
KB, do you want the 15 year old to kill someone before something can be done? At least now the child can be helped before someone is hurt.

Posted by: Mom on Sep 16, 2008 at 10:20 AM
Being the parent of an adult child with mental disorders, I am appalled that because of "behavior" problems, you dump your child. I agree with the safe haven law, as it was intended but not as a scapegoat for dumping an adolescent. Do they think this is going to solve their problems? I am sure it will get worse. This law should be amended! AND, parents should learn to be parents! Good Lord, those poor kids. I hope they find someone to love them-unconditionally. Isn't THAT what parents do? Not just love PERFECT children?

Posted by: cece on Sep 16, 2008 at 10:11 AM
Annette--I hope very much that the Media does not follow these children. I think they have had enough attention and I am sure they have not asked for any of it. Can you imagine being in the spotlight for being dropped off at a hospital? Haven't they had enough people looking at them? Also, we don't really know the situation with regards to why the gardians felt they could not care for these children. This may NOT be a 'don't want anymore' situation. Maybe instead of this making them a 'Bad' parent...maybe this makes them a 'Responsible' parent. Maybe it is in the best interest of the child that they do this. I do prey for the children.

Posted by: mike on Sep 16, 2008 at 10:03 AM
Although it is sad that older children can be dropped off at a hospital, it still better then not doing anything and letting the kids run wild and on the streets. We would be reading about these kids in a more tragic circumstance and the guardians would be on the news being interviewed claiming they could not control these kids. Now at least the kids are in the system and although it may not be the ideal situation at least they have a chance.

Posted by: KSL on Sep 16, 2008 at 09:53 AM
"OK I'm curious ... so now what happens with the teens? Do they go into the foster care system, without someone checking for other family, or what?" I can't speak for Nebraska, but there is a big push to place children with relatives. Though it seems obvious, this is relatively new! Though the process takes about 6 months, as the prospective home needs to complete a home study and personal background check.

Posted by: KSL on Sep 16, 2008 at 09:49 AM
I understand the woman with the 11 yr old was trying to adopt the child, but decided against it. So it looks like biological parents were not involved (I don't think this changes things, as the two children must have been state wards, and procedures should be in place to assist or relocate (if necessary) the children. We do foster care, and it can be difficult to have an 'really bad' child removed, who is a ward of the state, from your home...I know because we went through that ourselves!

Posted by: MOM on Sep 16, 2008 at 09:35 AM
This is a dream for losers parents! They are all going to come out of the wood work and drop off their poor children so, they can do drugs and party or give whatever lame excuse to throw away their children.

Posted by: CJ on Sep 16, 2008 at 09:35 AM
Walk a mile in the shoes of the adults here. We don't know the situations that these young people were in. It could be a case of finances (have you noticed the economy lately?) or it could be a case of Tough Love. Sometimes there are situations where the adults say "I have tried everything I can think of to help this child but nothing works." And there isn't always help available. You can earn too much to be eligible for assistance, but not enough to pay for it yourself. This could be the only way the adult could see to get these boys the help they need. Remember, don't judge, because you don't know all the facts.

Posted by: KImberly on Sep 16, 2008 at 09:24 AM
Every one give all these options of help and when people go to seek the help the workers are rude, uncaring and there is always a waiting list, or you have to qualify for the help. No one know what another person situation is so why is it prejudged by people who usually aren't qualified to do so. Look forward to seeing more of parents unable to manage their kids because the law have taken the right to discipline and put the kids in charge no wonder the youth center and the jail are crowdy. The average working person never qualify for help why wait to things are real bad to help when they should be nipped in the bud. Our society is doing a great a job at ruining lives.

Posted by: Matt on Sep 16, 2008 at 09:21 AM
This law wasa intended for people who have no value of life and do not deserve to ever pro-create again. You cant care for kids..here is an idea DON'T GET PREGNANT or get someone pregnant!

Posted by: Jen on Sep 16, 2008 at 09:17 AM
I have to hope and believe in my heart that the Aunt that dropped off the 15 year old had really good cause to do so (like illness or inappropriate home to raise children in- abuse/alcoholic/drug user.) If my sister were unable to take care of her kids, I would be the first one to stand up and take them in even if I couldn't afford it, even if they were brats- you know they would be dealing with emotional problems from their parents abandoning them to begin with. This story just breaks my heart and I hope these children get help from the scars that this will surely cause.

Posted by: llr on Sep 16, 2008 at 09:15 AM
What's sick is that the safe haven law would never have passed our STUPID unicameral if they hadn't tacked on the clause for older children. I say we pass a measure getting rid of the unicameral and get TWO legislative houses to prevent the asinine law-making that took place last session. No OTHER state with a safe haven law allows abandonment of children this old, why must we?

Posted by: Get Real on Sep 16, 2008 at 09:07 AM
I think the smart thing to do would be to allow children up to like the age of 3 to be dropped off. Look at the Caylee Anthony case in Florida, most parents get stressed out when kids reach the "terrible two's". I think a baby up to 72 hours old is a little too short of time period but up to age 19 is ridiculous! Lets review this law based on other child abuse cases...

Posted by: Just a thought on Sep 16, 2008 at 08:25 AM
The lady said she did noit know what else to do with the 15 year old if she would have put her hands on her out of control kid the state would have taken him anyway so she probably did it to prevent anything bad from happening to her and him I have seen some terrible teens sorry to say but as far as the 11 year old maybe the grandma was just to old who knows I don't think we have the right to judge unless we know the whole story.

Posted by: Sara on Sep 16, 2008 at 08:19 AM
The issue is not changing the law to prevent older children from being included it is to look at what these parents are telling our community. We do not have enough resources to meet the families needs. In both of these cases these children appear to be in care other than that of their parents. There is a connection between the behavioral issues today and the experiences these children have had earlier in life that prevent them from living with their parents. Earlier intervention for these families is essential. Please do not criticise these guardians for reaching out for help- this is obviously the best way they knew how. Our community should be compelled by these events to look at what needs to change in order to create better options for our families.

Posted by: Adam on Sep 16, 2008 at 08:16 AM
The law should not include all ages. The laws in other states are intended to stop the deaths of new borns who have no other choice. There are other options available to people who need assistance. Especially to people who are already abusing a thinned system, which is probably what these "parents" were already doing. Nebraska was the LAST state to make this law just behind Alaska. You back ways people are slowly killing me. Thanks alot Ernie for making your fellow Husker fans the punch line of jokes across the nation.

Posted by: Curious on Sep 16, 2008 at 08:04 AM
How many parents are going to take their 18 years old to the hospital after high school graduation so that the kids can have college paid for since they then become wards of the state and don't have to claim their parent's income on their FAFSA forms. Also wondering what they are going to do with an 18 year old as they have already aged out of the foster care system at that point.

Posted by: S on Sep 16, 2008 at 08:04 AM
What is wrong with you people? 15 and 11 are children. If there situation at home is one that they are not being taken care of, then it is a good thing that they will now be taken care of! Do you people not leave your computers? It is not just infants that need to be taken care of and loved...........

Posted by: Chris on Sep 16, 2008 at 07:47 AM
It is very sad that this has happened to these two older Kids. With this happening it really makes you think, what if that happened to me? What would I do? I was raised by my single mom and I know I gave her hard times when I was growing up but this is just crazy..What are we doing to these kids? And people wonder why kids are starting to get out of control at a younger age, having kids at 14 or 15 years old, shooting people. Everyone needs to come together and start acting like parents!! We are teaching kids that if they have kids when they are older not to worry just take them to a hospital instead of teaching them to take care of everyone. I'm really scared to see the next generation, cause we are teaching them to be lazy and "wimpy".

Posted by: Ben on Sep 16, 2008 at 07:42 AM
Are we becoming more and more like China...or is it just my imagination?

Posted by: M on Sep 16, 2008 at 07:22 AM
The law shouldn't be revised. Although I didn't expect that older children would be dropped off, I would rather have someone take their child to a safe haven facility than read about a tragedy that could occur if this parent felt there was no other alternative. Times are getting hard now and if someone is on the edge, I would rather have them drop off the kid @ a safe haven than throw them on the streets. We cannot judge people based on what is presented in this story-perhaps more info will become available and the citizens can look at it nonbiased.

Posted by: Cat on Sep 16, 2008 at 07:18 AM
It's amazing how ignorant some people can be, it should not matter the age of the child, there are hundreds of deaths a year of children by the hands of their own parents, remember I said children not infants. Folks, it is not always the teenagers with the mental defects sometimes the parents are not all there and the best place for the child is someplace else. Grow up people everyone needs a little help sometimes.

Posted by: JD on Sep 16, 2008 at 06:49 AM
TIP OF THE ICEBURG FOLKS...Now that this has hit the news...LOOKOUT! Another great disservice to the youth of Nebraska. How can one think the "system" will do any better than the parents or relatives...

Posted by: Chris on Sep 16, 2008 at 06:29 AM
I do not agree with the age on the Safe Haven Law. This should be for children under the age of two. What is wrong with those parents? Wasn't this law because of Ernie Chamber's? Seriously.

Posted by: CPS on Sep 16, 2008 at 06:18 AM
Ok, what is truly sad is the people who think that by dropping off a "child" this is crazy. I work for CPS and I see children all day long of ALL AGES that have been abused or neglected to the point of complete filth. Infested with lice and parasites. These boys will be safe now and will have a good place to live. A cooling off period for parents who get mad, that sounds like a good idea, but remenber it only takes one fit of anger to kill a child. What if there were a law that said you could do this back in the Susan Smith days? Do you think her kids would have suffocated in a lake of water? Abuse and neglect knows no age limit. I see parents all day long suffering financially. They can no longer take care of their children. Where do you think these kids are. Do you have ANY idea how many are in state custody? I can tell you more than you can imagine. The main point here people is to protect these children of any age who did not ask to be brought into this world but yet suffer for it.

Posted by: No One on Sep 16, 2008 at 05:49 AM
Thanks again Mr Ernie Chambers. It was his idea to make this law cover children up to 19 years of age. We made the national news about this and it once again made our law makers look like fools! Excuse me, I mean it made them look like typical polititions. I'm waiting for some poor shmucks to drop off all of their kids because they don't want to deal with them. Go Nebraska!

Posted by: Omaha Dude on Sep 16, 2008 at 03:39 AM
I've said it before and I'll say it again. Why does the law allow kids up until the age of 18 to be dropped off? If they're going to go that far, why not allow even older kids, 1ike a 19 or 20 year old, too?

Posted by: ME on Sep 16, 2008 at 03:27 AM
This is really very sad. You kind of wonder what kind of home life those two children had to make the parent/guardian decide that "oh well, it's been fun, but I don't want you in my life anymore. Don't let the screen door hit you on the backside on the way out." If these children had gotten so bad, why didn't they try Boystown or getting some counseling before it did get "that" bad? This law makes it too easy to just dump off the unwanted.

Posted by: Bill on Sep 16, 2008 at 03:06 AM
I am not a fan of the safe haven law. I believe that there has got to be a better choice than to abandon your child and walk away. How in God's name can you just walk away. This law according to other states is for babies....not 15 year olds. She could have waited couple of months and the kid could have drove himself to the hospital.

Posted by: Obed on Sep 16, 2008 at 02:00 AM
IF the legislature had included in LB157 that safe haven would be given up to the "Age of Reason". The question of age limit would have been easily resolved. That a parent or adult can just drop a person up to legal age at a hospital may prove way to tempting.

Posted by: B on Sep 16, 2008 at 12:00 AM
This is a perfect example of why our society is going down the toilet! What ever happened to parenting. Now people can just drop off children of any age from newborn to 19 years of age. GIVE ME A BREAK! LAZY PARENTS, PLAIN AND SIMPLE! You who did this and those that agree with what these people did should be ashamed of yourselves!!!!!

Posted by: An Officer on Sep 15, 2008 at 11:05 PM
I know this may not be liked, but I can actually see good coming from this with the older children. We get called to homes all the time where children are acting out in ways that the parents can't control them, and the kids know it, and abuse it. Don't believe for one minute that all you have to do is call the police when your kid runs away, that when we catch them, they'll never do it again. I've actually observed older children doing the exact thing that we get called about, minutes after we leave, and we can't just tale them to jail or juvenile detention. Maybe this 11 and 15 year old kids are now seeing that the parents just couldn't handle them anymore. Don't just blame the parents, because we as a society has made some parents afraid to spank their own kids. If society wants to take away how we raise the kids, then expect them to give the kids back to society to raise them. Seems fair now!

Posted by: So Sad on Sep 15, 2008 at 10:26 PM
I think that it is very sad that these parents felt they had no where to turn. However, I think that this hows the importance of this law. It is important to give these parents an out. The person who said how sad it was and it will scar them for their lives may be right however it may have scarred them worse to stay in that situation.

Posted by: Bellevue Aunt on Sep 15, 2008 at 10:23 PM
What's wrong with Nebraska lawmakers? Not only is this the last state to enact a safe haven law but then it's drafted and passed as if it were written by a bunch of mock lawyers. Nebraska lawmakers need to step up to the plate and do what's right by children who are not blessed with the resources or parents to help put them on the right path in life.

Posted by: Anonymous on Sep 15, 2008 at 09:35 PM
I see a lot of people criticizing the adults that dropped these kids off, but you don't know that it might have been the ADULTS that were in danger. An 11 or 15 yr old with serious mental issues cannot be handled by a single parental figure alone. Don't you wish Robbie Hawkins had been stopped? What about the teens that go crazy and kill their parents? We have NO idea what the circumstances are - the children may have been relieved to be left.

Posted by: A on Sep 15, 2008 at 07:59 PM
This is absolutley discusting. These adults should be ashamed of themselves. I am a complete believer in the safe haven law for babies but for someone who can pick up a phone and call you to pick them up that is absolutely the wrong thing to do. If these children had behavioral problems before, how do you think complete abandonment is going to help them? These poor kids will be scared for life and have a very hard time trusting any adults. How do they know that the adults they are supposed to trust to take care of them are not going to take them somewhere and just leave them. How can anyone in there right mind take a child that age and just walk away from them. Its sick and those people should be ashamed of themselves and I really hope the law changes to include only infants with the law.

Posted by: CS on Sep 15, 2008 at 07:47 PM
I'm completely shocked. If one is going to accept responsibility for being a legal guardian - step up to the plate and do your job - how is it that you just throw in the towel and give up? What a joke. And to the "parent" of the 11 year old... I'm sorry, but this is yet another joke. Isn't it a parent's job to go to the ends of the earth for their child no matter what? Do you wonder what you have done to this child now that you have dumped him like yesterday's trash? How pathetic and so very sad for both children. A baby would have no memory of this but these kids are going to feel abandoned for the rest of their lives. I certainly don't claim to know your circumstances but as a parent, I know that giving up and throwing my kid away would never be an option no matter what my circumstances. How terribly shameful.

Posted by: Gen on Sep 15, 2008 at 06:11 PM
The law should include all children. The older children will now be able to get the services that they need, without the parents/caregiver fearing neglect charges. Many times, the parents can not afford the medical insurance to pay for needed psychiatric care that their children need. Maybe this law wouldn't be needed for older children if insurance companies would pay equally for all medical illnesses, including pschiatric illnesses.

Posted by: Michelle on Sep 15, 2008 at 04:52 PM
Is this an example of throw away children or throw away guardians?

Posted by: Joy on Sep 15, 2008 at 04:47 PM
Praise the lord for Arnie Stuthman pushing for this law! Who knows what those children may have been forced to endure without the safe haven laws! I feel terrible that these two older children weren't wanted... but hopefully now they'll have a chance to find a home where they're loved.

Posted by: KB on Sep 15, 2008 at 04:43 PM
You have got to be kidding me. This law was to protect Nebraska's babies not ment for people to drop off 15 year old brats. Nebraska was the last state to adopt this needed law and now the way it is written will make us the joke of the United States. If the 15 year old is really that out of control then file a ungovernable paperwork with the courts don't leave him at a hospital, what a sad joke. This is not how this law is supposed to work.

Posted by: Annette on Sep 15, 2008 at 04:40 PM
How sad. Now what. Will the media follow the path that these two will take? I'd be interested and I'm sure others would too.

Posted by: Sad times on Sep 15, 2008 at 04:40 PM
It's too bad this happened, but you never know what someone's circumstances are. The case with the 15-year old boy and the aunt could be understandable. He's a teenager and he probably caused more problems then anything. What is more sad is I wonder what the situation with his parents was? I realize those are questions that won't be answered, but it can still be wondered about. Dropping off an 11-year old would seem like a very tough thing to do.

Posted by: Julie on Sep 15, 2008 at 04:37 PM
This is great news! Far past overdue...

Posted by: Sad day on Sep 15, 2008 at 04:35 PM
Why would someone drop off a 15 and 11 year old kid. Why not go to an agency to get them help? This is going to scar them for the rest of their lives. That makes no sense to me. Awake up people. I am glad though they were not harmed and wish those young kids the best of luck. God Bless!

Posted by: wow on Sep 15, 2008 at 03:55 PM
Kind of messed up for the kid that is old enough to know there parent/guardian is leaving them. I mean 11 & 15 year old kids know they just got dropped off and left with no remorse. I think it is a good law for infants and maybe toddlers but teenagers, there is other routes you can take with children that age. Just my 2 cents anyway!

Posted by: Wow on Sep 15, 2008 at 03:48 PM
A 15 year old and 11 year old. Feel sorry for these two kids, I bet they have had a hard life so far. Hope the parents don't have any other kids!

Posted by: Anonymous on Sep 15, 2008 at 03:39 PM
how can someone just leave a child behind????

Posted by: jenny on Sep 15, 2008 at 03:34 PM
those poor children - I hope they go to a better place.

Posted by: Anonymous on Sep 15, 2008 at 03:28 PM
How sad that these children are not wanted! I hope they find a home that will love & nurture them, if it isnt to late.

Posted by: Lil Ole Me on Sep 15, 2008 at 03:26 PM
OK, I am glad we have the Safe Haven law, but I am a little concerned about the kids up to age 19 provision... what are the chances someone needs a babysitter for a couple of hours, drops a kid off, then claims after 'cooling off' for a bit, they decided to try to 'make it work'. I see some serious abuses of the system, unless it is put in place that by the act of dropping off the kid like that you are relinquishing all parental rights at that time to the state.

Posted by: Chris on Sep 15, 2008 at 03:21 PM
This is a terrible law... So, any parent can not get upset with their child, and then drop them off at a hospital and abandon them? Absolutely insane. I hope there are consequences (parenting classes, childcare fines) for the parent when they realize they're not upset with their child any longer and go to pick them up. The state of Nebrask should be implementing programs to help parents BE parents, instead of providing ways for parents to abandon their 15 and 11 year old children.

Posted by: Sad State on Sep 15, 2008 at 03:01 PM
It is just so sad the state of affairs of Nebraska's mental health system that people have to resort to abandoning their kids at hospitals. Our family fortunately has the insurance to cover the care needed for our bi-polar child and our autistic child. If we did not have the insurance to pay for the monthly psych visits and the daily medications we would maybe be in the same boat. Nebraska has all but abandoned mental health care for those who cannot afford it and we are seeing the result, half grown children, not babies, being abandoned at hospitals. This ought to be a serious wake up call for the unicameral and the Department of Health & Human services that both have failed the residents of this state miserably.

Posted by: Dave on Sep 15, 2008 at 02:49 PM
This is just the beginning. Once the first few wayward kids were dropped off,more and more people with no parenting skills are going to get the same idea.

Posted by: Rachel on Sep 15, 2008 at 02:45 PM
I think this safe haven law is great...however these are not babies or young children...you chose custody of these kids...don't punk out and drop them off...its not fair to them

Posted by: Adam on Sep 15, 2008 at 02:30 PM
That makes me sick to my stomach! While there will surely be abandonment issues later in life when infants are dropped off I would assume being kicked to the curb as a teenager will take a greater toll on these kids. There are untold numbers of parents or guardians who have problems with their children and leaving them at a hospital is the most selfish, inhumane solution imagineable.

Posted by: Speechless on Sep 15, 2008 at 02:06 PM
ARE YOU FLIPPING KIDDING ME? UP TO THE AGE 19???? NOTHING LIKE TELLING YOUR KID THAT IT HAS BEEN FUN BUT WE JUST DON'T WANT YOU ANYMORE, HOPE YOU HAVE FUN WITH SOMEONE ELSE. I MEAN AN INFANT IS ONE THING BUT A CHILD WHO KNOWS, HOW INCREDIBLY SAD AND THOSE POOR CHILDREN AND HOW THEY MUST FEEL. GET A GRIP PEOPLE, THOSE ARE YOUR CHILDREN SO TAKE CARE OF THEM!!!!

Posted by: Young Black Man on Sep 15, 2008 at 01:48 PM
They Need To Be Slapped. The 15 Y/o Knows What Is going on. Thats Ashame. Should Keep Your Legs Closed And Condoms On.

Posted by: parent on Sep 15, 2008 at 01:43 PM
I don't think that children under age 19 are just disposable! maybe you should of used some protection in the first place.!

Posted by: Stephanie on Sep 15, 2008 at 01:29 PM
ARE YOU SERIOUS THE STATE SENATORS ALLOWED THIS TO THE AGE OF 19? THAT IS RIDICOLOUS AND WHAT ABOUT THE CHILD I CAN'T IMAGINE BEING 15 OR 11 AND MY PARENT, AUNT, BROTHER, SISTER, GRANDPA, OR GRANDMA DROPPING ME OFF AT A LOCATION BECAUSE MY MOTHER, FATHER OR BOTH DONT WANT ME ANYMORE. DID THEY NOT THINK OF THE HURT OR PAIN THAT THIS WILL LEAVE A CHILD WITH, THE FEELING THAT YOUR OWN PARENTS OR WHOMEVER DIDN’T WANT YOU ANYMORE? WE ARE JUST CREATING MENTAL AND OTHER PROBLEMS FOR THESE CHILDREN.

Posted by: Anonymous on Sep 15, 2008 at 01:29 PM
How do you just drop off a almost grown child. This is insane!

Posted by: just sick on Sep 15, 2008 at 01:24 PM
so if you don't want your kids up to 19years of age you just take them to a hospital.. What about the people like me who can't have kids.. you guys should feel blessed! what kind of place is this!

Posted by: TAM on Sep 15, 2008 at 01:21 PM
While I do not know the circumstances surrounding these cases, how would these adults like it if they were dropped off and left with the feeling that not even your own relatives want you? While I applaud a law like this, it also leaves an out for people to be the most inhumane creatures.

Posted by: Biff on Sep 15, 2008 at 12:52 PM
Those poor kids! I hope things turn out well for them. This is a better option than finding the kids somewhere beaten or dead, but this is still pretty sad and probably not at all what was intended by the authors of the bill.

Posted by: JLL on Sep 15, 2008 at 12:51 PM
Wow! I am glad that these children are safe...but how sad. I hope they end up in the arms of someone who will love them as a child should be loved!

Posted by: Marcie on Sep 15, 2008 at 12:49 PM
althought its wonderful there is a safe haven out there for kids with parents who do not want them and family memebers also, its very sad to see parents doing this, taking advantage of whats available when you could just step up and be a parent for whom you took responsiblity for when you decided to have these children, there are so many parents out there that are druggies, junkies, or just bad people alround, that choose that lifesyle over caring for thier child and drop them off for a safe haven, im shocked to see the ages (15 and 11) of these children in the story, thats 11 and 15 years of life you spent with these children and to just give that up? why? how? I was skeptical of have my son when I found out I was pregnant but now hes 2 and I couldnt imagine my life without him, I miss him after 8 hours of work and not being with him, Once people do this and drop them off for safe haven help, which is giving up your child, I hope and pray they dont get this kids back even if they wantd

Posted by: mTm on Sep 15, 2008 at 12:47 PM
What ???? 15 11 ???? Wow

Posted by: Anonymous on Sep 15, 2008 at 12:47 PM
OK I'm curious ... so now what happens with the teens? Do they go into the foster care system, without someone checking for other family, or what?

Posted by: mom on Sep 15, 2008 at 12:47 PM
Are you kidding me....how very sad. I can not even start to think how these two young people feel.

Posted by: Anonymous on Sep 15, 2008 at 12:35 PM
What? Obviously those kids are old enough to comprehend things. I wonder how you just drop off an 11 and 15 year old??

Posted by: OmahaAnnie on Sep 15, 2008 at 12:35 PM
Any child, regardless of age, is better off being dropped off at a hospital and safe than being with their family that does not want them.

Posted by: Cara on Sep 15, 2008 at 12:26 PM
How sad for those children... imagine how it would feel to be abandoned like that

Posted by: Anonymous on Sep 15, 2008 at 12:26 PM
WOW...up to 19?

Posted by: Anonymous on Sep 15, 2008 at 12:21 PM
Now - thanks to the news - there are going to be more kids abandoned by their irresponsible parents. This is just like a big banner saying "GOT A TROUBLED KID? DUMP HIM AT A HOSPITAL IN NEBRASKA - NO QUESTIONS ASKED"...there are too many kids in the foster care system already!!

Posted by: S on Sep 15, 2008 at 12:21 PM
WHAT??!!? An eleven year old and a fifteen year old? What is the matter with people? I understand infants, some people are not equipped to be parents. But after 11 and 15 years, the state should have known that these kids were not in households that were fit for raising children. To me this is crazy, one of these kids is practically grown. Did nobody notice in the last decade that these kids were unwanted? How do you do that to these kids? What do you say to your child, "hey, we've had a good run, but I am bored with raising you so I am just going to give you up." This is crazy.

Posted by: Sid on Sep 15, 2008 at 12:19 PM
In these cases, the law probably prevented harm to these kids - we don't know the circumstances or the needs these kids had, but I hope they can be taken care of in the right way now.

Posted by: Laura S. on Sep 15, 2008 at 12:19 PM
Though I believe this program is a net positive, I'm concerned that it has to be quite traumatic to children of this age. Certainly quieter, less dramatic arrangements can be made with social agencies. The idea of a 15-year old being "dropped off" at a hospital and left behind like that bothers me. Infants, certainly, but not already troubled teen-agers.

Posted by: Scott on Sep 15, 2008 at 12:17 PM
15 and 11 years old?? What??

Posted by: Anna on Sep 15, 2008 at 12:17 PM
What a completely disgusting thing to do to one's own child. Surely instead of giving people an easy out, we should be helping them keep the commitments they made by becoming parents. Children are not disposable. This is not a victory.

Posted by: Anonymous on Sep 15, 2008 at 12:15 PM
What a joke a 19 year old is hardly a child this should be a law for new borns and infants not half grown children and adults.

Posted by: Mother on Sep 15, 2008 at 12:10 PM
It's good there is a law like this, but how could you leave a child of that age? Can you imagine how that must make them feel to not be wanted? I was adopted and have that feeling everyday of my life. And one being dropped off by an Aunt. That is unacceptable. Even in the worst of times, families should stick together. I hope these children are well taken care of and loved. It breaks your heart.

Posted by: Lori on Sep 15, 2008 at 12:03 PM
Wow, I wonder what those poor kids must have thought and felt. An infant would have no cognitive memory of the event, but how sad for an older child.

Posted by: Kathy on Sep 15, 2008 at 11:55 AM
i know this law is a Good thing but i thought more for baby's how can a 15 year old and 11 year old get dropped off what you get tired of raising them. this makes me sick how do you htink these Kids feel it makes me sick to my stomach to read this. Parents need to step up and take care of their children.

AP Online Network
YOU CAST - YOUR PICS N VIDEOS
Media Partners