Home  ·   News  ·   Weather  ·   Sports  ·   Jobs  ·   Community  ·   Pics N Videos  ·   Station  ·   Marketplace  ·   6 on Your Side  ·   Contests  ·   Get Connected  ·   Blogs
Health Check · Lottery · DTV · Seasonal · Mom to Mom · Traffic · The Omaha Buzz · CityCAMS · My Weather · School Closings · HS Cribs · Restaurants · McKnight Investigates
WOWT.com on Demand
6 On Your Cell
News, Sports & Weather
Information On Your Cell
Text ALERTS
Breaking News Alerts
Direct to Your Cell Phone
Daily e-News
News & Weather Updates
delivered via email
You Cast
Submit Your Pics
and Video
What's on 6
Your Guide to NBC
& WOWT Programming
Teen Pregnancy Becomes Election Issue Save Email Print
Pregnancy of Sarah Palin's unmarried daughter has voters talking
Posted: 9:53 PM Sep 3, 2008
Last Updated: 11:57 PM Sep 3, 2008
Email Address: sixonline@wowt.com

A | A | A

Fair or unfair, the issue of teen pregnancy has dominated talk off the Republican National Convention floor in St. Paul, Minnesota this week. What do voters think and does this change the campaign?

As Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin's life is forever changed, becoming the first female Republican vice presidential candidate, her 17-year-old daughter's life will also soon change. Bristol Palin is five months pregnant. The family says she will marry her boyfriend.

"It happens,” said Kay Elsasser of Omaha. “Everybody has situations in their family that they have no control over."

"I sympathize with the girl, I mean she is very young, but I think it's going to effect the campaign," said Nikki Elsasser of Omaha.

For those who work with teens who become pregnant the hope is that Bristol's pregnancy opens America's eyes. "Maybe now, the people in this country will realize that this is a situation that happens to every economic level and you can be the best parent in the whole world, but you might not prevent it,” said Essential Pregnancy Services executive director Nancy Foral.

Last year, more than 2,600 young women came to Essential Pregnancy Services in Omaha for help. "The situation needs to be addressed. We're seeing more and more pregnant women, young women. Our average age here is between 17 and 18."

Foral says this can happen to any family. She sees it every day. It's something people like Kay Elsasser say we should remember when we look to those like Sarah Palin. "It's not because she's been a bad parent. Things happen."

Bristol Palin's pregnancy, in Foral's opinion, should also do something else. Put the issue on the table for families to have an open dialogue.

More Stories
Pre-teen Burglars ?

Attempted Armed Robbery

Lawsuit Filed Over Teddy Bear Spying

Man Eligible for Parole after 1-year on his tenth D.W.I. Conviction

Pension Spiking Revealed Again

Hearing Held In Attempted Murder Case

Parking Rage Incident

Flag Theft Arrest

Post Your Comments
First Name:
Location:
Enter Comments: characters left
Email (optional):
Email will not be displayed on site. For station contact purpose only.
Read Comments
Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
Posted by: kass on Oct 19, 2008 at 05:47 PM
sick just sick how the world is today

Posted by: EW on Sep 8, 2008 at 01:03 PM
Boyfriend, if you are going to have sex and if you would DEMAND an abortion if she gets pregnant, maybe you should take a few steps to prevent pregnancy. YOU could wear a condom. YOU could choose not to have sex. YOU could choose to have a conversation about the consequences of having sex BEFORE you do it. YOU clearly need to grow up before you set out to particpate in any act that would result in your reproduction.

Posted by: boyfriend on Sep 8, 2008 at 01:07 AM
I don't have a problem with a pregnant 17yr old, either. Unless she's my girlfriend and won't obey my demands to get an abortion. Do you really think it's always the woman's choice? Think again. For an underage girl, it's often the parents forcing the decision. On this issue, at least we know Sarah Palin practices what she preaches.

Posted by: EW on Sep 7, 2008 at 10:09 PM
Teen pregnancy doesn't have to become an election issue. The media will choose whether it is an issue or not. As far as the Palin family goes, they are a typical American family. Sarah Palin is human. She is a mom with a teenage daughter who had sex with her boyfriend. Every family faces its challenges. It is what we learn from these challenges and how we rise above them that makes us better people. Bristol is a brave young woman to face having her pregnancy on the world stage. She is very fortunate to have the parents she does who will only empower her to move past what could be a setback in a young adult's future.

Posted by: Kent on Sep 7, 2008 at 09:34 PM
Anonymous, you have a lot to learn about the real world. Were it really true "if you feed yourself you live, if not you die," then the human race would have died long ago. No baby is born ready to feed itself, unless you allow a certain amount of assistance, but your post makes it obvious you don't believe in assistance. You need to rethink your science of evolution mixed with the fantasy of mother nature.

Posted by: Anonymous on Sep 7, 2008 at 08:12 AM
I don't have a problem with a pregnant 17yr old. Who are we to say that mother nature's plan is wrong. What I have problem with is a mother of any age on welfare. Part of nature's plan is if you feed yourself you live, if not you die. That's evolution. It ensures a stronger, healthier, smarter species. To think otherwise is cruel and living in denial.

Posted by: Kris on Sep 7, 2008 at 02:07 AM
Democrats being the champions of abortion rights, they are also the champions of a woman's right to privacy. We're told privacy for abortion recipients is essential, thus privacy around a woman's pregnancy is essential, or a woman would need to lie to cover up her abortion. So it is the height of hypocrisy for Democrats to attack Sarah Palin for her daughter's pregnancy. (Or is it only Democrats who are allowed privacy?) If Bristol's pregnancy is an issue, we should also know how many abortions Michelle Obama has had and whether Joe Biden's daughter has had any abortions. We should know how many abortions Hilary and Chelsea Clinton have each had, and we should know how many abortions have come of Bill Clinton's liaisons--and we should know how many sons and daughters he really has. One violation of privacy deserves another...

Posted by: Anonymous on Sep 7, 2008 at 12:48 AM
If you think Sarah Palin should quit the race to take care of her family, then you must hate Joe Biden, also. When Biden's wife and daughter were killed in a car crash, and his two sons were critically injured, he considered resigning from the Senate to care for them, but he didn't resign. If you believe Palin is shirking parental responsibility, should we forgive Biden's shirking of parental responsibility because he's a man?

Posted by: Registered Voter Single Mother on Sep 6, 2008 at 10:47 PM
Tom, it really does take two. As far as I'm concerned which party will stop raping the middle class of all they work hard for?

Posted by: Savannah on Sep 6, 2008 at 09:45 PM
I know alot of 40 year olds who cant take care of a baby let alone themselfs! and Ive wittness some younger teenagers have better parenting skills then those 40 yr olds. and well! why do people forget that just because some families making head line news such as this! they are humans as well and have just as many rights to make mistakes to live and learn so to speak! let this girl alone and think postive, ask your self? " what would you want if you where in their shoes?"

Posted by: Teen Mom on Sep 6, 2008 at 10:21 AM
I think it's comical that there are so many ignorant people in this world. While I would agree that there are SOME teenagers incapable of taking care of a baby, that is definitely not true of every 17-year-old. My parents were extremely unhappy when I came home at 17 and said I was pregnant. I don't agree with the statement that EVERY teenage parent has medicaid/welfare, because I know it isn't true. And while I didn't plan on being a pregnant high-school senior, I DID take responsibility and at 8 months pregnant scored a 33 on the ACT. Even smart people make mistakes. And I am a big believer that age makes no difference. I've met/interacted with some really horrible middle-aged parents. I make good money, work full-time, go to school, pay my rent, have benefits and my child has everything he needs and wants. And I'm 21 with a 2 1/2 year old...so don't tell me it can't be done. I did it, and so have many other teens.

Posted by: ANONYMOUS on Sep 6, 2008 at 08:33 AM
Stop throwing stones! I had two sisters get pregnant at 18 and one at 16 and a stepbrother have his first at 16. All of their children are smart, well loved, well cared for and mature for their ages (two are now in the Army in Iraq). My siblings are wonderful parents. It's not often you see this, but I can tell you, I've seen it work. None of my siblings was ever on welfare. They went to work, school and took care of their responsibilities because our parents forced them to. Since they made their bed, they could lie in it. But our parents were always there if they ever needed them. That's all a family can do--love and care. Isn't that what the Bible teaches us? To love one another, even though we do things that the others might not like or appreciate?

Posted by: to elizabeth ann on Sep 6, 2008 at 08:01 AM
maybe you aren't as strong as she is? maybe she can handle more than you can.

Posted by: Anonymous on Sep 6, 2008 at 02:21 AM
If you tout "family values" as a strength, you need to be able to take the heat if your teen child gets knocked up.

Posted by: Daycare on Sep 5, 2008 at 11:15 PM
Teens are too stupid to be fit parents. What kind of values are they taught by their parents?. It is the welfare cycle.

Posted by: Jeff on Sep 5, 2008 at 11:07 PM
To - Slim/To Jeff: is the "close minded partisan zealot" argument the best you could come up with? I had hoped democrats apply some values based objectivity to their voting, but I see I was wrong. I suppose it is easier to let the talking heads do your thinking for you. However, our country wasn't founded the easy way, but the easy way will destroy it.

Posted by: To Teen Moms: on Sep 5, 2008 at 05:39 PM
Don't expect the rest of us to be juming up and down at any teens decision to keep & raise their baby...a teen isn't mature enough to raise a child. And they can't afford to. Grandma & Grandpa or the good old state are going to be footing the bill for the baby. So don't expect people to be cheering for you...don't have a child until you are old enough, mature enough and financially stable enough to take care of it by yourself.

Posted by: Erin on Sep 5, 2008 at 05:29 PM
There is nothing stereotypical about anything I wrote in my post. At 17 a teen can't financially take care of a child period. Not to mention that they aren't at all emotionally mature enough to take care of another human being. They don't live by themselves or have health insurance or a full time job to feed & clothe a baby. Condoms and the pill aren't 100% which is why you should use both especially if you think as a teen that it will be all fun & games to have a baby. I am sure your mom & dad who footed the bill or the state of Nebraska, if not your parents, would have appreciated a bit more responsibility on your part.

Posted by: To Erin on Sep 5, 2008 at 01:52 PM
And just to finish my last comment, condoms are not 100%, and neither is birth control. I ate dinner with my parents every night growing up, I've never done a drug in my life, and I don't drink, even though I'm of legal age. I was on birth control when I got pregnant. And even though I was upset, I kept my son, and I've never regretted it. He's the best thing that's ever happened to me. People like YOU shouldn't be allowed to be parents because you are not understanding or compassionate at all. I think before you go spewing stereotypical comments you should think again.

Posted by: To Erin on Sep 5, 2008 at 01:49 PM
Your comments are ignorant. I was a 17 year old pregnant high school senior. I graduated high school exactly 3 days before I gave birth to my son. I have raised him as a SINGLE mother for the last 2 1/2 years. I have a full-time job with BENEFITS. My son goes to his grandma for daycare, so that I can work full-time. I have received NO money/help/insurance from the government. My son is perfectly healthy and extremely advanced for his age. Just because I was 17 when I had him, means nothing. I'm a full-time mother first, a student second, and an employee third. My son knows that he's loved by ME. My parents are not raising my son, but they are a huge part of his life. Bristol Palin's pregnancy is a non-issue. I bet you're someone that would say she should've had an abortion. I applaud her decision to keep her baby even though it's going to be hard and she won't have a normal teenage life.

Posted by: ANON on Sep 5, 2008 at 01:31 PM
I gave birth to my first child at age 17. I graduated High school two months later. At this point my daughter is 16 and beautiful. I'm glad i had the support i did with my family. It saddens me to see people shun those who choose life. I am a proud mother of 3 now and have no regret. Guess what! Still not married. I see far too many marriages end in divorce these days.

Posted by: JL on Sep 5, 2008 at 11:40 AM
to J from Bennington: You are right on!!

Posted by: To MV on Sep 5, 2008 at 11:28 AM
How exactly do you go about keeping your child from getting pregnant? Keep them locked up and not let them go do anything? Pretty sure teenagers are going to have sex no matter how many times parents or teachers tell them not to, unfortunately thats how things are these days. But if you know how to keep a teenager from getting pregnant please let us all in on the secret!!!

Posted by: DHB on Sep 5, 2008 at 10:37 AM
I think I read somewhere that teens in general do not practice birth control because subconciously that admits they are having/plan to have sex and subconciously they know it is wrong. No form of birth control is 100% but by taking the pill, most teenagers have to admit they have made a conscious choice to participate in sex. Perhaps they used a condom and it did fail...it's been known to happen. That, and maybe it was the very first time. Some people get pregnant the very first time they have sex...happened to a relative of mine long ago. Anyway, they're getting married so what's the deal?

Posted by: To Jeff on Sep 5, 2008 at 08:36 AM
There is obviously no reasoning with you as you are a close minded partisan zealot. You and the rest of the 28% my friend, are what is wrong with the country. I pity your poor lost soul.

Posted by: Anonymous on Sep 5, 2008 at 05:11 AM
Anonymous@5:22pm, do you have the ability to pick up a Bible and find the verses yourself? Why wait on someone else's action?

Posted by: Bill on Sep 5, 2008 at 05:01 AM
Just drop it. The media - which is pro Obama/Biden is trying to make an issue out of this for the election. The media is so biased. I can make decisions on my own, I don't need the media and entertainment people to do it for me. This thing with the Palin family is nobody's business except theirs!

Posted by: over fifty male on Sep 4, 2008 at 08:53 PM
1. The daughter is not running for public office so this should not be an issue. 2. How do you know the guy didn't wear a condom? Those things aren't 100% guaranteed. Neither is birth control. 3. Am I supposed to believe that all of you making an issue of this never engaged in premarital sex? Yeah, right!

Posted by: bill on Sep 4, 2008 at 08:36 PM
anonymous, right on am a democrat and have no problem with Gov. Palin's daughters choice, had the tables been turned I don't think you republicans would be so open minded. Oh Henry why don't we all just join the military since that makes us better peaople, get real at least in this great country we have a choice to serve or not and no one should be judged either way.

Posted by: just Me on Sep 4, 2008 at 08:23 PM
I don't think that anyone including the media should say anything about bristols pregency shes not in office her mother is..leave her out of it. How many presidents while in office had sexual relations with someone other than thier spouse? Lets see her kennedy,clinton to name some and this is while they were in office.

Posted by: Jeff on Sep 4, 2008 at 06:46 PM
Slim, you have a very narrow view of recent events. That is, you are incorrect, sir. John Edwards was campaigning for the presidency while his indiscretions were yet undiscovered. Eliot Spitzer was New York's governor at the time of his scandal, and his presidential hopes are now dead. It's funny how you can't recall those recent events, but you seem fixated by the homosexual exploits of Larry Craig and Mark Foley. Interesting. Are you knocking homosexuals, Slim? Are you secretly interested, but deep down believe it's wrong? Values, Slim, values... (For the record, Sarah Palin is not running for, as you say, the "Executive Office of the President of the United States," [I doubt you even know what the phrase means, since your usage is wrong] and Palin is not an unwed, pregnant woman. The point is, you defend the unethical actions of leaders such as Edwards and Spitzer, but you attack Palin for the actions of a family member. Invoking Craig and Foley doesn't cover your extreme bias.)

Posted by: J from Bennington on Sep 4, 2008 at 06:06 PM
@Etta: If you're a "values" voter, please consider Illinois Sen. Obama's actions in connection with Illinois' version of the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act, which managed to pass the U.S. House and Senate and get signed into law in 2002. Obama blocked passage of that bill, protecting babies born alive during an abortion, despite the bill being identically worded to the U.S. bill. "Values"? Hey, I'll take a candidate with a pregnant daughter over a baby-killer any day. The daughter made the choice, not the candidate. Ill. Sen. Obama himself made the choice to continue to allow the most desperate of victims to be killed.

Posted by: "Not So Old Dad" on Sep 4, 2008 at 05:53 PM
News flash: Teens have sex! The best parenting in the world will NOT change that! It has happened since man began walking on the earth. Just why do you think people were married in their teens (prior to this century)? There ARE worse things than teen pregnancy...rewarding it with Welfare! The fact that her daughter is pregnant has nothing to do with her ability to be Vice President. However, arrogance and narrow-minded views on contraception are a bigger issue! It does not make sense to me that in this country Health Care plans will pay for an old man's Viagra but not a young woman's contraception AND then be hypocritical AND say that sex is only for procreation AND continue to make ALL abortions illegal. Before anyone starts, I am against abortion in most cases AND should NOT be used as birth control AND there is no such thing as "late-term abortion"...IT'S MURDER! After a (medically determined) time, abortion should NOT be an option unless the life of the mother or child is in danger.

Posted by: Anonymous on Sep 4, 2008 at 05:22 PM
Where is the right side proclaiming a bible verse denouncing out of wedlock sex?

Posted by: Cathy on Sep 4, 2008 at 05:10 PM
You think Obama knows anything about the "middle class". I truly doubt it - more was spent on his campaign than many people together will earn in a lifetime. To understand the "middle class", you have to be one. As far as talking to a 12 yr old about birth control - she/he is probably listening just like her daughter. Like most children, you can talk until you're blue in the face - they will do as they please. Abortion is legal - but not a method of birth control!

Posted by: J on Sep 4, 2008 at 05:04 PM
typical media trying to find the fault in everyone - wonder how many of them have had out of wedlock pregnancies in their families - hypocrites!

Posted by: To Tom 8:31 on Sep 4, 2008 at 04:54 PM
So it's the girls? No red blooded american male would be, could be an instigator? Whe I was a girl in high school there sure was alot of pressure from my boyfriend!

Posted by: K on Sep 4, 2008 at 04:50 PM
It is pretty sad that anyone would put a presidential campaign ahead of a family that clearly really needs them to be close to home. So much for family values!

Posted by: reality check on Sep 4, 2008 at 03:41 PM
It wasn't an issue until a liberal and biased media made it an issue with the sole intent of making Gov. Palin look bad. Good news reporting...eh...

Posted by: To Henry on Sep 4, 2008 at 02:37 PM
Wow!!!! Did you just get an email forward and believe all of it without any research for yourself? Did you also read the email where he is a secret Muslim? How about the one that he was sworn in on a Quran? The only people these lying smear emails fool are the people not bright enough to check out the story to find the truth for themselves. If you want the truth, you have to consult as many sources as possible and figure it out for yourself. Don't rely on the media, Rush Limpbau, Sean Hannity, Keith Olberman etc. to give you the truth. They have an agenda, to make money for themselves. The sooner you realize it the better off you'll be Henry. Have a nice day.

Posted by: moreta on Sep 4, 2008 at 02:25 PM
would we even be having this discussion if the VP nominee were a male and his teenager was preggo--of course not because it would be up to the wife to take care of the problem while he was off saving the free world. The double standard is alive and well Of course the democrats had real hissies about chelsey and amy being in the news and the media respected it but the same courtesy does not apply to the republicans. Of course the real joke is that whoever gets into office nothing will change because nothing can be done if congress and the surpreme court don't want it to happen.

Posted by: Anonymous on Sep 4, 2008 at 02:25 PM
the only reason this is 'okay' is because the parents have the financial support they can provide. if bristol was 'on her own' she'd drop out of school and/or go on welfare. i'm 24 and know that i'm not ready for a kid. if i did, my parents would support it, but wouldnt give me any financial assistance because it is MY responsibility.

Posted by: to mae and to tom on Sep 4, 2008 at 02:17 PM
Mae so what if abortion is legal what does that have to do with it. are you saying that the girl should have aborted the child instead of owning up to it and KEEPING the baby. God help your child if this ever happens to her. Tom you are a sexist jerk. Why is it ALWAYS the girls fault. I had a "talk" with my daughter's boyfriend who kept after to her to PROVE she loved him by having sex with him even though on numberous occasions she said no. Needless to say he is no longer in her life. My sister and her boyfriend let things get out of hand ONE time and she got pregnant. They have the cutest little 8 year boy and they owned up to the responsibility. Our parents were the strictest one in the neighborhood but there tons of times we snuck ut to do things. Kids will do that even in the best of families and we all know it.

Posted by: ... on Sep 4, 2008 at 02:11 PM
I wonder if her personal issues have changed her thoughts. I understand her still being against abortion-- but maybe she'll understand that some sex education is needed to help prevent this? Maybe it won't change anything for her I would just be interested to know.

Posted by: Issues on Sep 4, 2008 at 02:11 PM
Let's focus on the real issues: who can best address jobs, taxes, security, war on terror, size of government, health care

Posted by: anon on Sep 4, 2008 at 02:11 PM
This shouldn't dictate how well she does. She is proving her stance though (regardless of who's pregnant)-- pro-life. It's funny that a person is an adult at 18. Why should AGE have anything to do with what stage you're going through in life? There are plenty of 30 year olds out there that shouldn't be considered "adults" financially, I can see the issue with teen pregnancy. again--some 30 year olds who can't even afford themselves have babies too.

Posted by: DM on Sep 4, 2008 at 01:53 PM
LOL! Pharisees!!!! That is priceless :-)

Posted by: Mae on Sep 4, 2008 at 01:44 PM
No, actually the Enquirer did out it first, the next day McCain/Palin announced it. Families should not be brought into it, but be real; they are. The press is making more of this issue than any of the politicians. And WTF, I must have more honest conversation about birth control with my 12 year old than this woman had with her daughter. Last I checked, abortion was still legal.

Posted by: jj on Sep 4, 2008 at 01:21 PM
what obama say has nothing to do with this. people will make a issue out of what they think that they can. this ms palin seems to be in the same boat as the majority of american households not perfect,just human.

Posted by: DD on Sep 4, 2008 at 01:03 PM
Family should not be an issue in a campaign - they are not running for office. What should be an issue is how one stands on the problems facing our country right now. We did not hear that last night - all we heard was her bashing the Democrats, especially Obama. I guess Bush's speech writer didn't feel she would know enough about issues the "middle class" are dealing with to put comments on her teleprompter. No need for a sleeping pill tonight - McBush will take care of that! Even with a teleprompter, he has trouble talking.

Posted by: Elizabeth Ann on Sep 4, 2008 at 01:00 PM
I have gone through a child with a disability and a child who became a mom while still in high school. It took every ounce of my energy to deal with those issues, and I certainly would not have put the country at risk by trying to decide which priority took top billing, my job or my family. I think perhaps Mrs. Palin has a few too many irons in the fire to serve as second in command. Also, talk about not being versed in the issues!!!! How well does she understand national security? I am very afraid for the well being of her little boy, with the national spotlight on him. Will he be exploited because he has different gifts and abilities, just to gain votes? And, what about the right wing conservatives who back the GOP? Will they suddenly be forgiving and accepting of the pregnant, unwed mom, just because her beauty queen mom is on the ticket? Come on! Talk about waffling on the issues.....GOP, please pass the syrup!

Posted by: CATHY on Sep 4, 2008 at 01:00 PM
So she has a baby - the problem? Happens everyday. If people seem to think this is a moral question - don't even ask about CLINTON! At least he was an adult and knew the consequences. He is a disgrace to the US. At least this girl is exactly that - A GIRL!

Posted by: D on Sep 4, 2008 at 12:58 PM
Unfortunately, for Bristol (and the baby) their lives will become an open book - just like Britney Spears (who by the way is an idiot). You can teach a child the difference between right/wrong, and raise them with the same morals/values that you were raised with, but when you mess with fire (in this case sex) you will get burned. Parenting, educating, and understanding can only go so far. The young folks of today need to understand that actions have consequences, and you deal with the outcome. Life isn't pretty when you are young, and you have to raise a family, and then somehow figure out how to financially afford it. Take away the teenage mother programs like wic, etc, and make them wait until they are 21 to get any assistance. The only assistance a teenage mother gets is the help of the family, and for this case an okay family...not the case for all of them. It's long past time to hold people accountable for there actions.

Posted by: Henry on Sep 4, 2008 at 12:57 PM
This is a no-issue, unless you really want to give the same attention to the fact Obama won't and does not respect the American flag. He doesn't feel he needs to stand during the National Anthem, not placeing his hand over his heart for the flag. He NEVER once served a day in the military and has NO clue what it takes to defend this country. Those things are more important to me than a teenage girl getting pregnant, and her willingness to meet her new responsibilities as a mom.

Posted by: Annie on Sep 4, 2008 at 12:32 PM
The issue I see is her pro life stance.

Posted by: To Erin on Sep 4, 2008 at 11:17 AM
I'm still with my sweetheart after 25 years. It does happen. I must agree with the fact we need to adress this and explore what approach to take to prevent more pregnancies. PARENTS talk to your children! I did - no babies babies in my house.

Posted by: Sara on Sep 4, 2008 at 11:14 AM
It's ridiculous how the media glamourizes and promotes teen pregnancy, like saying 'Oh Jaime Lynn Spears looks sooo cute pregnant, those baby pictures are so cute', why feed this kind of publicity. Parents don't want their teen daughters having babies but yet they are the ones buying Ok magazine promoting teen pregnancy with Jaime Lynn Spears on the cover, it's unfortunate that Sara Palin's daughter has to go through her pregnancy in the media but what I don't understand is how the media harps and scrutinizes Palin's 17 year-old daughter for becoming pregnant, but Jaime Lynn Spears was 16 when she had her child and it was acceptable. Use condoms, use the pill or the shot, nothing bothers me more is unwed teen mothers or low income mothers living off of the gov. getting welfare checks because their too damn lazy to take responsiblity, if you cannot afford a child, stop having sex!!!

Posted by: Biff on Sep 4, 2008 at 11:11 AM
me - LOVED the analogy, and it is true. I knew people were going to vilify Gov. Palin. Would you question her 'grip at home' were she male? Seems to me like moms AND dads are equally necessary, but the women get this trip laid on them. Why is Bristol Palin given 'different treatment'? Um, that might be because we can see that, back to me's point, she was probably guided in a totally different direction than that which she chose to follow vs. just looking around her and doing what the 'Romans' do (case in point: the unmarried mom here in town that had almost a dozen kids by multiple dads, then lamenting the fact that her teen daughter's pregnant - duh....). Yes, it's noted that Obama said the topic was off-limits, but he has no control over the media (enamored with him though they may be), so they will just beat this drum endlessly whilst the ones regarding the Dems' more blatant moral failings remain silent.

Posted by: Steve on Sep 4, 2008 at 11:07 AM
Any teen girl that becomes pregnant..."accident" or not, needs to take responsibility. And so does the father. PERIOD ! ! !

Posted by: Slim on Sep 4, 2008 at 10:55 AM
To Jeff: You bring up Edwards and Spitzer, as far as I'm aware they are not running for the executive office of President of the United States. Guess what? Sarah Palin is. On a lighter note, at least they didn't get caught cruising the airposrt bathrooms for some male companionship or send young male pages dirty text messages asking to rub them down. Values Jeff, values...

Posted by: To Denise Barche on Sep 4, 2008 at 10:47 AM
The Obama/Biden campaign did say the issue is null. However, they do not speak for me. I want to know the truth about the people running for White House. The truth will set you free. God Bless.

Posted by: Mitch on Sep 4, 2008 at 10:44 AM
The party of Lee Atwater and Karl Rove is crying unfair to personal attacks? I believe the word is ironic. Your chickens have come home to roost GOP'ers!!! Enjoy!

Posted by: James on Sep 4, 2008 at 10:42 AM
In the words of Karl Rove, Sarah Palin is "fair game."

Posted by: jesse on Sep 4, 2008 at 10:40 AM
People that want to pretend teens buy into abstinence only programs are ignorant. Teens will be teens and "life happens" so lets try and educate them to protect against unwanted pregnancy. This way there will be fewer abortions and fewer people going on welfare to receive aid to raise their children. Being proactive we can use sex education to help eliminate abortion. It's that simple.

Posted by: MV on Sep 4, 2008 at 10:40 AM
Remember: This is the same political party that went on and on about Murphy Brown's pregnancy. Preaching about family values and so forth. And they choose a V.P. who can't even keep her own daughter from getting pregnant at 17. That is your hypocrisy! And this Palin woman going on and on about how we should be teaching abstinence. Lady, if you can't make it work in your own house with your own kid, it ain't going to work anywhere!

Posted by: Joel on Sep 4, 2008 at 10:34 AM
The GOP hates it when you hold them to the same standards to which they hold you. The Bible has a term for people like that, Pharisees. I seem to recall the Pharisees and Jesus didn't get along so well. Same thing is true today.

Posted by: Lori on Sep 4, 2008 at 10:31 AM
I think the whole point of this non-"issue" is that Bristol is going to marry the father and HAVE the baby, as opposed to having an abortion. Pro-like being one of the founding planks in the Republican Party's platform, as it were. Teenagers have been getting pregnant out of wedlock for generations. I do agree, in this age of state-of-the-art contraception, it shouldn't happen, but it does. Get over it. At least she knows who the baby daddy is.

Posted by: Claire on Sep 4, 2008 at 10:29 AM
This Palin is just a liberal trying to act like a Republican. Nothing more. My party is based on Family values, and the last time I checked we need to have our house in order before we can tell others how to live. She has failed. She is an utter embarrasement to my party.

Posted by: Scooter on Sep 4, 2008 at 10:25 AM
This is the best the Grand Oil Party can do? You should be ashamed!!! Hypocrits!!!

Posted by: T on Sep 4, 2008 at 10:25 AM
After all the efforts by the MSM to cover up the John Edwards affair and Willie's past trangressions, it is bizarre to see them making such a big deal out of a "miskate" many families have to address with teenage daughters. I find it refreshing that Palin and McCain made the press release on this (no Enquirer investigation required) and they had their soon to be son-in-law on stage with them. That is showing strong support for their daughter, and soon to be son-in-law and grandchild, nothwithstanding the sewage spilling out of the MSM.

Posted by: Etta on Sep 4, 2008 at 10:23 AM
I am an older woman and I happen to be a values voter. Sarah Palin can't even teach values to her daughter, how can she lead by example to our nation? Just another immoral Clinton type in the White House. God alone can help us.

Posted by: Kent on Sep 4, 2008 at 10:19 AM
Come on Dems! Come off of your high horse named Double Standard. You claim that pregnancy and abortion are personal issues. Yet, now the pregnancy of a candidate's teenage daughter has become an election issue, even after you claimed President Clinton's affairs were personal issues. Sure, Sen Obama said families should be off limits. But what has he done about it? He hasn't fired any staff members. He hasn't called on the media to drop it. Either he's lying, or he's not much of a leader.

Posted by: Kathy on Sep 4, 2008 at 09:36 AM
Working parents or not...this is a teen age girl taking responsibility for her actions. She could have called it a fetus and had it scraped out like nothing ever happened. Instead...she's chosing to give her child a chance at life. Something we all deserve no matter what conditions we're born under. I would even applaud her if she gave it up for adoption to two people who can't conceive and would appreciate this new life given to them.

Posted by: Values on Sep 4, 2008 at 09:20 AM
Am I the only one who finds it funny that the Repulican party has run a hard stance for years against gays and their current VP has a daughter who is gay. They have run for years against public education on safe sex and condoms, now their VP nominee has a child who is having an out of wedlock marriage. How can people be so backwards thinking to beleive that these are such horrible things in life when the people they look up to are basically hypocrates of the party values? By the way, I AM voting for Obama because althought he may be a bit of an unknown he at least exemplifies his parties beliefs, he is a minority, young and fresh thinking...just what we need right now.

Posted by: Dennis on Sep 4, 2008 at 09:14 AM
Even though Palins family is off limits. Sarahs view on no sex education and no birth control is stone age. How far right can the republicans go?

Posted by: M on Sep 4, 2008 at 08:55 AM
Whatever you guys-teen pregnancy happens, has happened and always will happen. Parents of teenagers who become pregnant are not all bad-I can't see how some people think that she wouldn't be a good vice president just because her daughter got pregnant. For the record-I haven't decided on who I will vote for-

Posted by: Tom on Sep 4, 2008 at 08:31 AM
Only the DeMOcRATS are bringing up the pregnancy issue. Look at yourselves in the mirror before you pass judgement. Children have nothing to do on how a Country is run. It's your Congress that runs the country. The President & VP are figure heads. It's a DEAD ISSUE by Obama Himself. Drop It

Posted by: Anonymous on Sep 4, 2008 at 08:23 AM
Those abstinence programs the religious right been pushing really paid off.

Posted by: Tom on Sep 4, 2008 at 08:08 AM
Well now, if these little girls would keep their pants on, instead of getting 'hot and heavy' with their boyfriends, they wouldn't get pregnant now, would they? We don't need more teen pregnancies, we don't need more people on welfare. Somebody needs to talk some sense into these young people. Kids shouldn't start popping out until AFTER marriage. Not before.

Posted by: Realistic on Sep 4, 2008 at 07:34 AM
Honestly what do we expect our teens to do when you have artists that they listen to like Soulja Boy who was 16 or 17 when he released Crank That, a song talking about sex. Society is a BIG contradiction, they wanna cry about teen pregnacy or how the youth of today will bring nothing positive for tomorrow but in the next breath you have music companies, radio stations and tv stations promoting teen sex and teen violence. And just for the record I am not excusing parents. People need to pull their heads out of their butts and do what they have to do and raise their children right whether your a single parent or not.

Posted by: DDB on Sep 4, 2008 at 06:32 AM
This to me is not about politics, it is more about the American public being honest with itself. When minorities talk of the subtlety of racism or elitism, this change in attitude is what they are speaking of. I know it is hard for us to evaluate ourselves but just think what a alot of Whites think when they see a young person of color in the local mall with a baby. The comments are not positive I bet. We should take this opportunity to understand why is this a family matter only now when years ago it was a epidemic of growing single mothers and broken families. Have we just given up on raising our teens or have our teens just given up on US being parents? "Life happens" is not an answer in my opinion. Let's step out of the box here for a second and take politics out of it. I don't care what the politicians have said, what i am asking is can we not see the double standard here and have parents just give up on raising their children after the teenager hits a certain age?

Posted by: come on really on Sep 4, 2008 at 05:14 AM
She has not left her son? She might be busy, but she has not given him up, in fact she has many more years with the child. I know a mother who 'gave up' her downs child the day after she gave birth, and had 2 other "normal" kids at home.......that my friend, is someone who didn't want to deal. As for not having a grip at home...agin, as a teacher I saw some of the best and brightest, from some of the best homes get pregnant in high school. Not for lack of parental involvement...just pure immaturity on the kids part. Quit judging people, unless you've walked in their shoes.

Posted by: me on Sep 4, 2008 at 04:12 AM
While getting pregnant out of wedlock is not the "correct" thing to do, one must remember, teens are not all together yet. Raising teens is like nailing jello to a tree. You can talk to them, ground them, take away the car keys, but in the end, they still find ways around you. If it happened to one of my daughters, I would hope I would have the decency and maturity to help her make the right decision for her, the baby and the father to be as well. I do not cast stones at pregnant teens. Some of my high school girlfriends were unwed mothers. Some of my sisters were unwed teen mothers. We have to put our differences aside on this and realize it's not the end of the world when a teen couple gets pregnant, even if it is a politician's daughter.

Posted by: tee hee on Sep 4, 2008 at 01:13 AM
Both of them are a joke just as bush..Time to move back to greece and watch the circus from there. Pretty soon this country is gonna be called " moved to china" of america.

Posted by: yes really on Sep 4, 2008 at 12:27 AM
i applaud ddb and anonymous on their open honesty. dean what an idiot? drive up teen pregnancy to get more people on welfare? does that make sense? pretty sure this young lady wont be on welfare so whats the point? it does show that Palin does not have a grip on home. If she cant control her kids how will she help return this nation to what it once was? if this is not a red flag i'm not sure what is. OBAMA FOR PRESIDENT.

Posted by: Jeff on Sep 4, 2008 at 12:23 AM
Anonymous, you ask: can you imagine IF this happened to a Democrat? Do you mean like John Edwards alleged child with a film maker? Or Gov Spitzer's high priced affair with a prostitute? Oh, wait, those were public figures cheating on their wives, not fallible teens. But was Edwards really cheating on his wife, since she knew about the affair when it was happening, or did his wife approve of the surrogate since she was sick with cancer? So while Democrats are into hiding things, you have the gall to cry "hypocrite" about the candidate who has been completely open about her daughter's pregnancy. Talk about hypocrisy.

Posted by: Erin on Sep 4, 2008 at 12:13 AM
Teen pregnancy SHOULD be an issue. 17 year olds can't take care of a baby by themselves. They can't sign a lease, they don't have full time jobs to have health insurance to take care of their kids and who actually stays married to their high school sweetheart? My parents & my husband’s parents didn't. Don't get knocked up as a teenager...it isn't hard. Condoms are cheap & readily available & I would be willing to bet most parents would MUCH rather have their daughter on the pill than prego as a teen...you can get the pill from planned parenthood. Don't get knocked up...make sure you aren't knocking your girlfriend up. It isn't hard. Mr. & Gov Palin are going to be raising this baby, just like all the other parents of teen parents. I don't think teen pregnancy should have anything to do with this election, but it should be an issue...abstinence obviously isn't working...

Posted by: Really? on Sep 3, 2008 at 11:27 PM
This is a woman who left her child who has down syndrome 3 days after giving birth to him. She has a daughter who is pregnant. Maybe she needs to spend a little time in her house not the white house.

Posted by: Dean on Sep 3, 2008 at 11:20 PM
Whos making it an issue? Media which likes to try and stir up and change the real issues. Again many of the democrat supporters probably support teen pregnancy due to involves getting more people on welfare. Vote for experience in office, not family issues.

Posted by: DDB on Sep 3, 2008 at 11:03 PM
From what is being said on television teen pregnancy is O.K. as long as the parents of the teens provide their support. I seem to remember in the past, when teen pregnancy was perceived as a problem in just minority communities, America was pointing to bad parenting as the cause. The teens at that time were out of control and facing very difficult futures according to the "mouth peices" of the time. My how times have changed when the problem surfaces in non-minority circles, "Things happen" is what is being said now. Now we have no control over what our teens do. What a change, I will leave it at that.

Posted by: Anonymous on Sep 3, 2008 at 10:55 PM
Interesting, the hipocrisy we're seeing here: completely leaving Bristol Palin out of this, isn't it curious that usually, the Dobson, Falwell, Perkins crowd would be the first to demonize someone who got pregnant out of wedlock? (Another thought: can you imagine if this had happened to a Democrat? They'd be going on and on about "lack of family values, poor parenting, etc.) Curious they suddenly have a moderate, sensible view, "these things happen, it's none of our business, we wish them well", etc. when it's one of their own. Why the double standard? Interesting also, the Republican camp talking about "exploiting" these kids when they're the ones doing the exploiting--using the as puppets to "energize the base". Meanwhile, Obama is the one saying "leave them alone; I'll fire anyone on my staff who tries to bring them into this". Hoopefully this won't go unreported.

Posted by: DENISE BARCHE on Sep 3, 2008 at 10:23 PM
NOW, LISTEN UP WOWT.COM THE OBAMA/BIDEN CAMPAIGN SAID THAT THE PALIN PREGNANCY IS A NULL SUBJECT!!!!!!!! RESPECT THE FAMILY! ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!!!

Posted by: ray on Sep 3, 2008 at 10:18 PM
give me a break. so she is pregnant and the father is going to marry her. there is NOTHING illegal about this. So just drop it please. I thought obama stated familys would not be involved especially the kids.

AP Online Network
YOU CAST - YOUR PICS N VIDEOS
Media Partners