Home  ·   News  ·   Weather  ·   Sports  ·   Jobs  ·   Community  ·   Pics N Videos  ·   Station  ·   Marketplace  ·   6 on Your Side  ·   Contests  ·   Get Connected  ·   Blogs
Health Check · Lottery · DTV · Seasonal · Mom to Mom · Traffic · The Omaha Buzz · CityCAMS · My Weather · School Closings · HS Cribs · Restaurants · McKnight Investigates
WOWT.com on Demand
6 On Your Cell
News, Sports & Weather
Information On Your Cell
Text ALERTS
Breaking News Alerts
Direct to Your Cell Phone
Daily e-News
News & Weather Updates
delivered via email
You Cast
Submit Your Pics
and Video
What's on 6
Your Guide to NBC
& WOWT Programming
Rare Cancer Gene Prompts Tough Decision Save Email Print
Woman faced same dilemma as actress Christina Applegate
Posted: 12:05 AM Aug 20, 2008
Last Updated: 1:07 AM Aug 20, 2008
Email Address: sixonline@wowt.com

A | A | A

Actress Christina Applegate has been open about her recent battle with breast cancer. While the disease was only in one breast, she recently had a double mastectomy and is now cancer-free. It’s a drastic decision, one a local woman also had to make.

At age 36 and with a family history, Applegate underwent genetic testing. The result was positive for the riskiest breast cancer gene, BRCA1. "Her likellihood of having breast cancer on either breast is in the neighborhood of 75-80 percent,” says Dr. Edibaldo Silva, director, of the Creighton University Medical Center Cancer Center.

Dr. Silva says for Applegate, a double mastectomy was smart, but hers is a rare case. Only five percent of breast cancer patients have the genetic mutation.

Thirty-year-old Tricia McSorley is one of them. "I just wanted to know what my options were and how we would face it from here on out so that I could live the longest and healthiest life possible for not only myself, but definitely for my children."

With the same dangerous gene as Applegate, she too made the decision to have a double mastectomy two years ago even though Tricia's never been diagnosed with cancer.

"No regrets. None. Every day I wake up a blessed person for making the decision I did to have the surgery."

A double mastectomy does not end the risk for those with the breast cancer gene. The genetic marker also puts them at a much higher risk for ovarian cancer which is much harder to detect and because of that, often fatal.

“About the age of 40 I will have both of my ovaries removed. I've made that decision,” says McSorley.

It's a decision Applegate will face as well. "I definitely would never wish this upon anyone and I do feel for her and her family for going through the same things that our family has gone through, but it is wonderful she's willing to speak out about it,” says McSorley. By raising awareness she says lives can be saved.

Dr. Silva says genetic testing does not make sense for everyone since only five percent of breast cancer patients have the gene. Younger women, those with a family history, especially males in the family with breast cancer, are good candidates for the test.

More Stories
Pre-teen Burglars ?

Attempted Armed Robbery

Lawsuit Filed Over Teddy Bear Spying

Man Eligible for Parole after 1-year on his tenth D.W.I. Conviction

Pension Spiking Revealed Again

Hearing Held In Attempted Murder Case

Parking Rage Incident

Flag Theft Arrest

Post Your Comments
First Name:
Location:
Enter Comments: characters left
Email (optional):
Email will not be displayed on site. For station contact purpose only.
Read Comments
Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
Posted by: to T on Aug 21, 2008 at 02:08 PM
How it is not ethical to have genetic testing for a cancer such as this? In the story, it talks about having prophylactic surgery. Obviously if you have a genetic marker for breast cancer, and have your breasts removed instead, then there is no breast tissue for the cancer to invade, and thus no "cure" is needed. I think these are wonderful scientific breakthroughs...if you know what terrible disease you might get in the future, and you could take steps to prevent that disease in the first place, why on earth wouldn't you?

Posted by: llo on Aug 20, 2008 at 02:41 PM
I am a two time breast cancer survivor and my Dr. recommended I have the genetic testing done - twice I was denied by Mutual to have the test - to me this is preventative medicine - no one else in my family has had breast cancer - I think she made a wise decision.

Posted by: Nameless on Aug 20, 2008 at 01:08 PM
I had to make the same decision in 1954 after two biopsies and a Mother who actually had breast cancer. It was rough -- at that time Cancer was considered a 'dirty disease' and no support groups available. But with the love and comfort of a very devoted husband, we survived. The doctors were speechless when I gave birth to a healthy son 2 1/2 years later! I've never looked back and now look forward to celebrating my 90th birthday in a few short months. My Mother lived another 17 years before she lost her life in a house fire. So there is life after breast cancer surgery.

Posted by: Lori on Aug 20, 2008 at 11:36 AM
Good for you, Rhonda...best wishes! I know I would not hesitate to do this if I had a family history of it, either. However, I was told most health insurances will not cover the prophylactic removal of tissue "just in case"? Or perhaps that has changed? I'm 47 and have never had genetic testing, but no female in my family (on either side) has lived past age 63, many of them died much younger (and none of them from cancer). I would also certainly have had a hysterectomy if I had a family history of those cancers.

Posted by: Pam on Aug 20, 2008 at 10:25 AM
I to had the markers, I also had a grandmother, mother, and uncle who all had passed away from this deadly cancer. I did the same thing almost four years ago and have never looked back. It is the only way to take control of something that you have no control over. I was lucky enough to have the support of my husband and my family without them it would have been twice as hard to do it, although I have never once regretted the decision that I made. Good luck, you now have your life back.

Posted by: Jarbeau on Aug 20, 2008 at 09:38 AM
Kudos to Christina Applegate. It's not often a former child star displays such foresight.

Posted by: T on Aug 20, 2008 at 09:13 AM
This is one of many examples of science getting out in front of ethics. All the gene research has allowed science to identify people who are pre-disposed to certain diseases, however, in many cases, there is no cure for the disease (yet). Should we routinely screen people for the presence of these genes? If so, what do we tell them, especially if there is no cure? Can employers and insurers screen for these defects and use them in hiring or insurance determinations?

Posted by: Rhonda Kohl on Aug 20, 2008 at 03:32 AM
I am only 25 years old and have already gone through a double mastectomy and cancer treatment. About a year ago I found a mass in my right breast and due to my huge family history of breast cancer I opted to have a prophylactic bilateral mastectomy. Well coming out of surgery it didn't end up being prophylactic. After waking up from my surgery my husband had to tell me I had breast cancer. Shortly after my surgery I was tested for the BRCA1 (breast cancer gene) and was positive. This result did not surprise me. I now have gone through 6 months of chemotherapy and undergoing reconstruction. It has been the hardest 6 months of my life, but I am happy to say I am now cancer free and done with treatment!

AP Online Network
YOU CAST - YOUR PICS N VIDEOS
Media Partners