Home  ·   News  ·   Weather  ·   Sports  ·   Jobs  ·   Community  ·   Pics N Videos  ·   Station  ·   Marketplace  ·   6 on Your Side  ·   Contests  ·   Get Connected  ·   Blogs
Health Check · Lottery · DTV · Seasonal · Mom to Mom · Traffic · The Omaha Buzz · CityCAMS · My Weather · School Closings · HS Cribs · Restaurants · McKnight Investigates
WOWT.com on Demand
6 On Your Cell
News, Sports & Weather
Information On Your Cell
Text ALERTS
Breaking News Alerts
Direct to Your Cell Phone
Daily e-News
News & Weather Updates
delivered via email
You Cast
Submit Your Pics
and Video
What's on 6
Your Guide to NBC
& WOWT Programming
Should The Legal Drinking Age Be Lowered? Save Email Print
College presidents nationwide support idea
Posted: 10:15 PM Aug 19, 2008
Last Updated: 10:45 AM Aug 20, 2008
Email Address: sixonline@wowt.com

A | A | A

A number of college presidents, many at well-known, prestigious universities have signed on to the idea of lowering the drinking age from 21 back to 18 in an effort to curb binge drinking.

The federal government decided to raise the drinking age to 21 in 1984. States could decide whatever they wanted, but would lose millions in federal highway funds if they bucked the trend.

Now there's added pressure from more than 100 college presidents to change. They believe binge drinking puts students most at risk and think the way to take on the problem is by lowering the drinking age to 18.

"I think 19 would be better 'cause that would keep high school kids from buying it for younger classmates," says Creighton law student Mark Kiesler. While UNL and Creighton have not signed on to the list of college presidents pushing for lowering the drinking age, there are some big-time schools on the list of who are, including Dartmouth, Duke, Johns Hopkins, Syracuse and Ohio State.

"Treating our students in a more adult way brings out the best in them,” says Ohio State President Gordon Gee.

"There is no proven research to show that it would impact binge drinking rates and lower them," counters Cassandra Greisen with Project Extra Mile. Greisen wonders what parents must be thinking for those going to a school where the president is on record supporting a lower drinking age. "It is sending a mixed message to the students, 21 is 21."

UNL Chancellor Harvey Perlman tells Channel 6 News, "I do not think merely dropping the legal age to drink would have a beneficial impact. I do not think simple solutions usually lead to solving very complex problems."

Creighton University's Father John Schlegel says, "My experience of more than 30 years of living on college campuses tells me that the 21-year age limit has not resolved the situation. It should be looked at in the broader context of education for responsible drinking."

As Creighton gets ready to welcome its largest freshman class in 30 years, the university will sit down with each of them and their parents.

"We just take it seriously,” says Creighton Assistant Vice President for Student Services Tanya Winegard. “We know that we need to partner with everyone and be clear in our messages about alcohol. It's an important issue for students and they need to make good choices."

Since UNL began its program, students report binge drinking decreased more than 20 percent in a decade.

Coe College in Cedar Rapids, Iowa is the nearest college whose president endorsers a lower drinking age. Again, with highway funds tied to it, states would be hard-pressed to change anything and Congress hasn't entered the debate.

More Stories
Senators Back To Work In Lincoln

Attempted Armed Robbery

Pre-teen Burglars ?

Lawsuit Filed Over Teddy Bear Spying

Eligible For Parole After One-Year On 10th DWI

Pension Spiking Revealed Again

Hearing Held In Attempted Murder Case

Parking Rage Incident

Post Your Comments
First Name:
Location:
Enter Comments: characters left
Email (optional):
Email will not be displayed on site. For station contact purpose only.
Read Comments
Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
Posted by: Anonymous on Sep 1, 2008 at 07:17 PM
I think that changing the age to 19 would be better. Its not fair that kids can go off to war, have the right to vote, but can't have a drink now and then. Everyone knows underage drinking is already occuring, and kids are doing it because they know its wrong and they enjoy the fear of getting caught. If it was lowered they wouldn't think it was "the cool thing to do". i think that 19 year olds should be legally able to drink. That way they are away from highschool where they can't give it away to the younger students.

Posted by: Brisnon on Aug 31, 2008 at 08:13 AM
I think either 19 or 20 would be better ages to legalize drinking and just changing the times to serve alcohol in clubs would be another change they have. Also limiting the drink consumption for each age having wrist bands for different ages (different colors) to have the limit.. Plus bars and clubs would be making money. Not to mention transportation companies like limo's and cab companies.

Posted by: Keith on Aug 24, 2008 at 04:57 PM
Tim, our country is full of what you would call "double standards". For example, our population as a whole is fine with the military using fully automatic weapons, but they don't want such weapons in the hands of the common citizen. On the other hand, our common citizen enjoys freedom of speech, while our military members must put their freedom of speech on hold. Is either example wrong and against the founding principles of our great country? Of course not! Our military members have fewer rights than the common citizen. So don't fall prey to the ignorant argument that relates military service to common citizenry. That's an insult to both of us.

Posted by: alicia on Aug 24, 2008 at 03:35 PM
Its a difference between serving our country and picking up a beer. You dont have to think much about killing terrorists. But you dont have to think about the consequences of drinking and driving which must 18 year olds would do if allowed to drink.

Posted by: Tim on Aug 24, 2008 at 02:21 AM
Two points to clear up here: The military “law” on drinking age is the same now as it was in the early 1980’s. The base and its personnel will have the same drinking age as the non-military people in the surrounding area. This was set up to ensure there were no double standards (like the 18yo = adult but must be 21yo to drink) for all people living in the area of a military base. Second, the comparison of “if you can go into the military you should be able to drink” was only meant as a comparison of rights and responsibilities. Most of the posts here only meant it in that regard, not the “military personnel should have more rights” mode. Double standards are wrong and against the founding principles of our great country.

Posted by: Chris on Aug 24, 2008 at 01:19 AM
Mike, I don't know how I could have taken your comment about our soldiers murdering Iraqi children the wrong way. And I'm saying if you aren't volunteering to defend your country, you don't deserve the beer at 18.

Posted by: Betty on Aug 23, 2008 at 10:59 PM
I have only one simple word on this NO!! Law makers better not make another stupid choice just because our teens want to do something extremely stupid and don't have the patience to wait till the legal age

Posted by: Robyn on Aug 23, 2008 at 02:58 PM
It's been a debate for years, I personally am only 23, but I was young and stupid at 18 and not much better by 21. I'm not saying I'm not still young and stupid, but I believe 21 is the youngest the limit should ever be. Your brain is still developing at 18, and teen are influenced more by their peers at 18 then when their brain is fully developed. Of course, if you drink irresponsibly no age is safe.

Posted by: Mike on Aug 23, 2008 at 11:31 AM
To Chris - You took my comment the wrong way. All i'm saying is if at 18 you are old enough to hold an AK-47 in the name of your country, you should be old enough to open a beer with that same hand. I meant nothing against soldiers, at all.

Posted by: Two Cents on Aug 23, 2008 at 11:28 AM
Do any of you really believe a drinking age has ever stopped underage drinking? It never has and NEVER will. Until parents and individuals take responsibility for their children's and their own actions a drinking age will only cover up the problem. The parents need to teach their kids how to drink responsibly and it is up to the individuals to control themselves after that, government shouldn’t try and legislate or have a magic age where you have responsibility with alcohol. The schools want to lower the drinking age, ok, but they too will have to share in the responsibility of teaching them how to handle drinking. The reason I believe that "binge drinking" is happening in the first place is no one has ever taught these young people to respect alcohol or how to drink responsibly. If they don't learn it from the parents, they WILL learn it from their peers and when their peers don't know right from wrong, the blind is literally leading the blind.

Posted by: B. on Aug 23, 2008 at 03:06 AM
Hey that's a great idea, now when people get their licenses they can celebrate by drinking and driving! Heck my girlfriends sister was killed by a 34 year old senior citizen that was drunk. Just think how many he could have killed if he started at 18?

Posted by: Josh on Aug 22, 2008 at 09:58 PM
I can't imagine how insanely stupid it would be for them to lower the drinking age to 18. They seem to think it would reduce drinking? That is the funniest thing I've ever heard. Lets see if the drinking 18 is 18, then people that our seniors in high school can buy for all there younger friends. Finding alcohol would become even easier. For colleges, it doesn't matter what the drinking age is there is almost always going to be underage drinking lowering the drinking age will make it worse.

Posted by: Whats next on Aug 22, 2008 at 09:21 PM
yes lower the drinking age to lets say 13, driving at 13 give all 13 y/o a birthday present of a gun and a pound of pot. you say this is stupid well allowing 18 y/os to drink is just as stupid.

Posted by: Jeff on Aug 22, 2008 at 03:43 PM
Jeff from Omaha, please put together a reply based on facts. Where you there during prohibition? To argue "it's well known" is the idiot's excuse to escape from rational thought. And to say "more people drank more alcohol during prohibition" is meaningless. More people than what? More people than rode on the Mayflower? More people than since prohibition? And more alcohol than what? More alcohol than was consumed on the Mayflower? More alcohol than has been consumed during every spring break? Come on, Jeff. Put something coherent together, and stop hiding behind fantasy and innuendo.

Posted by: moreta on Aug 22, 2008 at 12:56 PM
Lower it to 19 that will keep most high school students from LEGALLY drinking (not that it will stop them completely), but give the older people who have all other adult responibilities except for drinking and gambling their full adulthood. Igave my son and daughter the same type of card on their 21st birthday--"Now you can do legally what you already have been doing". I never saw them drink except at special parties at home but I know they did. In college we drove to Kansas to drink because it was 18 legal there. NE legal age was 21 then just before my 21st birthday they lowered it to 20 the day my boyfriend turned 20. LOL

Posted by: Biff on Aug 22, 2008 at 12:10 PM
Jake - I hope you really did learn your lesson. Not all parents would've had the charges thrown out for their kid, regardless of their ability to do so (that's called enabling). Using your logic (which a lot of others use and for which I've little tolerance), should we remove stop signs? No one pays attention to them around here (same with stoplights). Same with speed limits - why not just turn West Dodge into the autobahn? 21 DOES work for those people who have a respect for and obey all laws, not just those with which they agree.

Posted by: Luke on Aug 22, 2008 at 12:01 PM
I don't really care if it is lowered or not because I will be 21 by the time it happens!!

Posted by: Charlie on Aug 22, 2008 at 09:50 AM
I agree that if you are old enough to vote and old enough to serve in the military then you should have the choice to have a drink. The question is.... Maybe 18 is to young for the voting and serving your country. I don't know the answer to this, but whatever lawmakers decide if you are given adult powers then you should be able to drink and make adult decisions. **Next, gambling age lowers to 18!**

Posted by: Father of 3 on Aug 22, 2008 at 09:09 AM
The age limit is good and should be left alone. If I could have drank legally at 18 when i was 18, I would be dead now. Think hard before you debate this. 18 is a little young for booze.

Posted by: Jeanne on Aug 22, 2008 at 09:06 AM
We all turn our heads to college student alcohol use. We all know they drink. They always have and they always will. I think it is a terrible lesson to teach our kids to selectively adhere to the law. It is a stupid law - responsible alcohol usage should be taught, not prohibition. Kids become adults at 18 in every other way. Why should we treat them like children when it comes to alcohol?

Posted by: Jeff on Aug 22, 2008 at 06:45 AM
Jeff, it's well known more people drank more alcohol during prohibition. How do you think Las Vegas got built. We can thank prohibition and know the drug war for practically all the organized crime in the U.S. today. Thanks for asking Jeff.

Posted by: Jake on Aug 22, 2008 at 12:35 AM
I don't drink and drive anymore. I learned my lesson. Yes my parents got the charges thrown out, so what? I am sure you would do the same things for your kids too if you have the capability. So chill people. All I am saying is that 21 isn't working obviously and it may or may not be lowered, but I will guarantee you that it won't ever be raised.

Posted by: larry on Aug 22, 2008 at 12:24 AM
To mv-thats why you shouldn't drink at all. Nothing makes sense to your types. An 18 year old service person (soldier) on active duty and on base should be able to-as they tend to have more than a lick of it (sense that is). Join your buddies at Memorial Park. They probably will share their booze with you!

Posted by: Chris on Aug 21, 2008 at 11:37 PM
Mike, you conveniently forgot that not all 18-year-olds are mature enough to (get into the military and) be shipped off to Iraq. So you want to give a country full of immature 18-year-olds the privilege to get drunk, drive drunk, and murder children at home? Sorry, Mike. Can't respect your idea. You’re a base hypocrite. Your bias makes it obvious you're not going to Iraq, so you have no right to try vicariously demanding a lower drinking age through an organization you despise.

Posted by: Krissy on Aug 21, 2008 at 10:03 PM
It really doesnt matter. More will start drinking. I know ppl that buy drinks for minors. Its an easier way for the teens to get it. I mean, at the same time, I agree with mike. It really doesnt mater cuz who drinks now will still drink when that happens. Oh well

Posted by: Lori on Aug 21, 2008 at 02:46 PM
To Dan in S.D.: Man, you said it. Let the punks have their own bars, where they can blare the jukebox at deafening levels, pick fights and destroy property (all of which happen too frequently at our neighborhood bar, and it is always the 20-somethings involved.) And if they lower the drinking age, maybe they should raise the minimum driving age.

Posted by: Mike on Aug 21, 2008 at 01:19 PM
I think if you are old enough to be shipped off to Iraq and be trusted with an AK-47 to murder Iraqi children, I think you should be old enough to have a beer!

Posted by: Anonymous on Aug 21, 2008 at 01:10 PM
Jake, You and your friends are all irresponsible fools. It's the young guys like you who do stupid drinking decisions that we all see on the news. I will look for your name in the 'frat party gone bad' stories that will occur this year.

Posted by: Stunt Man Mike on Aug 21, 2008 at 12:56 PM
If I am allowed to buy cigarettes @ 18 and proceed to murder countless innocents with my second hand smoke, it would seem only fair that I should also be able to buy alcohol thereby affording me another venue in which I might continue my murdering nefarious ways. All this thinking has made me tired, Big Brother, will you think for me?

Posted by: Biff on Aug 21, 2008 at 12:46 PM
Jake - I have relatives in Lincoln whom I'd like to see again - at their homes, living and breathing, not in a morgue because of some drunk idiot crashing into them. If you're going to be stupid, at least find a designated driver. I totally agree with llr. I wish I would've been caught and charged when I was drinking and driving - I would've wasted a lot less time, well, being wasted and spent a lot more time being a productive member of society and a loving member of my family.

Posted by: Dan on Aug 21, 2008 at 11:58 AM
If you have not served or are not willing to serve in the military do not use the military as an excuse. I am a former Marine (89 to 93). We were allowed to drink beer on base to keep us from going to Tijuana. Guess what? We started on base and ended up going to TJ anyway. We took a bus or a train to TJ and did not drive. I do not drink and drive today. San Diego has a great trolley system that takes you right to the heart of downtown from about 25 miles out. THe only reason I do not want it lowered is because it is bad enough having drunk obnoxious 21 to 24 year olds in the bars. I am not saying I don't get drunk here and there, but I am a happy drunk that wants to shoot pool and talk sports.21 year olds feel they need to drink there weight in beer. At that time they are "invincible" and want to fight everybody.You don't see that as much with 30's and up.We have jobs and family's to support. Lower it but let them have their own bars.

Posted by: llr on Aug 21, 2008 at 11:23 AM
To Jake: Your obvious lack of maturity is exactly why the drinking age should be raised, not lowered. And I suppose the charges were dropped on your graduation night because your big hot-shot daddy and mommy got you off.

Posted by: MV on Aug 21, 2008 at 10:23 AM
List of things I could do when I turned 18: Buy cigarettes, buy pornographic materials, get married, drive a car, register with the government for selective service, vote for the leaders of our government, be sentenced to death for committing a murder and enter into a legal contract. List of things I couldn’t do for another three years: Drink and gamble. Doesn’t make a whole lot of sense to me.

Posted by: Mom of 2 on Aug 21, 2008 at 10:12 AM
I got married at 18 and had my first baby by 19, I wasn't allowed to even go out with my husband and have a glass of wine with dinner, but if I stayed home my husband could by me a whole bottle of wine and I could sit there and drink all I wanted to, but I didn't because i could if I wanted to. I haven't been much of a drinker since highschool. I drank more in HS than I have since I turned 21. I am now 25, and I can have a drink if I so choose, but if I was allowed to drink in HS I probably wouldn't have been much of a drinker then either. I think we should have more of a european structure, that way it is made out to be no big deal, and you start with your parents, who can supervise the amount of consumption and you end up thinking about it as a normal occurance instead of they told me no, so I will hide it and drink as much as I can in one sitting.

Posted by: Stephanie on Aug 21, 2008 at 09:21 AM
When it comes down to it all depends on the person. I mean honestly age ain't nothing but a number there are some 18 years old that act mature and act like adults yes and there are some people who are 50 years old and act like children no age will ever be good enough for drinking it all depends on the person and how mature they are. There are people of all different ages that drink and drive saying thats its okay to drink at age 18 to me isn't going to make a big difference it will still be the same stuff happening regardless maybe even worse

Posted by: Alicia on Aug 21, 2008 at 09:17 AM
It really doesnt matter if you lower the deinking age or not. Children under 21 are going to drink anyway. A lot of these places do not card any way, so that makes it easier to get alcohol. Lowering the drinking age will only cause more problems with our youth. You have people talking about legalizing marijauna (bad idea)because it will stop people from wanting to buy it because its legal. Legalizing marijauna will only cause a jump in other drugs. Keep the drinking age at 21. Matter of fact I say raise the drinling age. People at 21 are still to immature to be buying such a powerful substance.

Posted by: Jeff on Aug 21, 2008 at 09:03 AM
John, I'd like to see your sources for your comment on alcohol consumption. Who kept these universal alcohol consumption statistics during prohibition? Or are the statistics just convenient estimates from the government to justify their actions?

Posted by: Jake on Aug 21, 2008 at 08:19 AM
Us teens drink. Legal or illegal were going to drink and its not going to stop us. I got pulled over the night of my graduation for drinking and driving. I got mip, zero tolerance and speeding. All the charges were dropped. Me and my friends start college at UNL this weekend and we will be partying, just like all of our kids will be. Ha try and stop us. Your law isnt working. People being killed or not.

Posted by: George on Aug 21, 2008 at 08:05 AM
Leave the age at 21. Won't be long here and well be drinking in the skyboxes at Memorial Stadium again. Go Husker/Bud

Posted by: Tom on Aug 21, 2008 at 07:14 AM
I lost 2 children and my wife to a 19 year old drunk driver. 21 is also too young, the age should be raised to 22 or 23.

Posted by: John on Aug 21, 2008 at 06:27 AM
You people really don't get it. I shouldn't have to tell anyone this, but. More people drank more alcohol during prohibition then before or after. Decriminalization of marijuana in Holland has shown the Europeons that fewer persons will use a drug if there's no or little legal risk involved. So why are we making the same mistakes over and over? Probably the same reason some people just keep watching American Idle over and over.

Posted by: SmartWater on Aug 21, 2008 at 04:11 AM
If the drinking age is lowered then DUIs will definitely increase along with deaths; but it is bad enough already. Kids seem to sneak out and get away with it quite a bit. 18 would be the lowest age; because that is when you are considered an adult anyways and joining the military at 18 is okay too. It just goes with being responsible. I know teenagers that are way more responsible than some 40 year olds out there. I agree with lowering the drinking age; but only if they can prove to be responsible.

Posted by: thurman on Aug 21, 2008 at 01:13 AM
if the age of drinking is lowered the crime rate might rise ;;think ,we want to make life in omaha better not worse

Posted by: Keith on Aug 21, 2008 at 12:41 AM
If lowering the drinking age will reduce drinking, why are the beer companies lobbying for the change? Let's get a clue. If you want the answer, follow the money.

Posted by: T on Aug 20, 2008 at 11:56 PM
Wow! I just love drinking! And I will be 18 next year in May!

Posted by: Laura on Aug 20, 2008 at 09:32 PM
How about NO minimum drinking age? How about legalizing pot? When are we going to learn that prohibition doesn't work? If kids drank when they were first curious about it, they would probably be bored with it long before college and be able to study after all. The taboo increases the fascination with doing it in the first place.

Posted by: Teri on Aug 20, 2008 at 09:28 PM
The ONLY reason colleges are doing this is to eliminate the liability of all those morons who drink 30 beers and jump out a 3rd floor window.

Posted by: Tim on Aug 20, 2008 at 09:25 PM
Since everyone drives over the speed limit why not raise that too to say 100 or 150mph. Than we could have drunk 18 yr olds driving 120 mph. How cool would that be? And stop with the stupid comparison of old enough for war old enough to drink. Fine, go join the military than. Get shot first than drink all ya want. What idiots.

Posted by: to answer on Aug 20, 2008 at 09:07 PM
I just wanted to say something to"Young College Student- I Know plenty of young adults that are VERY immature who are in the military. Just because you join doesn't make you mature. And have you watched intervention. The horrors people see in a war are horrifying. Some people can hide the binge drinking. I even new a guy who is a meth addict who worked in the recruiting department for the military. He was so good at hiding it that you couldn't even tell by talking to him. So don't just ASSUME that people are good because they are in the military. anyone can join.

Posted by: Aly on Aug 20, 2008 at 09:02 PM
OH that sounds great let young kids with guns be able to have alcohol! WOW that sounds amazing. It will def. bring the homicide rate up in loads of states.*rolling eyes* I agree that the government makes it more enticing to drink because there is an age limit. But I think it isn't a good idea. Being a former addict I know how easy it is to get hooked on something, and parents not being able to control their kids in the aspect would be a terrible choice. Also at 18 most kids are getting ready to drive. It wouldn't be a good thing to mix young drivers with the temptation of alcohol. I'm on the line. In some aspects it would be a good thing on others, it could bite us in the butt.

Posted by: Sgt Slaughter on Aug 20, 2008 at 08:26 PM
I like the idea of allowing 18 YO's in the military drink. It would increase the recruitment rate into the US Armed Forces. Join the Army, get free JD!

Posted by: Savannah on Aug 20, 2008 at 08:08 PM
Miltary yes! on base or with ID. Not for collage however! to many drop outs the way it is, because of partying at nites.

Posted by: WOW on Aug 20, 2008 at 06:22 PM
I think it should go up to 30....those in their 20's are not willing to handle all that comes with the drinking.

Posted by: Joe on Aug 20, 2008 at 06:02 PM
Wow, so many ignorant, uninformed, knee-jerk reactions here. I've been to Europe, and in Germany the legal drinking age is 16. And guess what? I didn't see any drunken children running around. The problem with our attitude with alcohol is that we make it so taboo for the young that it becomes the "forbidden fruit" that they have to have. In Germany, one can walk down the street drinking an open beer if they want. Not here. You'd be arrested for violation of an open container law. If we relaxed our attitude towards alcohol, we could have so many fewer problems. If you lower the drinking age, it's not so forbidden any more and as stated previously, kids feel less of a need to get drunk if they can buy and drink any time they want.

Posted by: Bob on Aug 20, 2008 at 05:19 PM
Unfortunatly, most 18 year olds are drinking anyhow and most parents don't even know or don't believe THEIR child would ever do that....Baaaa

Posted by: Against on Aug 20, 2008 at 05:03 PM
With all the multiple dui's being out and all the other negatives. I say raise the drinking age to at least 90. That way they can start arresting more so called adults and use the money to pay down the national debt.

Posted by: Young College Student on Aug 20, 2008 at 05:00 PM
Being able to vote and join the military is done by MATURE young adults. These individuals rarely, if at all, binge drink. If they do, I would like to know how they are fighting in our war or making the right decision on who to vote for. I don't think that we should compare these situations together. Joining the military is OPTIONAL and so is voting. I don't think that being able to drink, be intoxicated, and potentially harm themselves or others should be OPTIONAL for people of that age. They are already going through enough changes and transitions. I do not believe adding liquor to the mix would help!

Posted by: Young Omahan on Aug 20, 2008 at 04:55 PM
Coming from a young adult, I think this is ridiculuous! MANY 18 year old's are not mature enough to handle the responsibilities of drinking. There are already enough under-age individuals who drink, if we lower the legal drinking age then people even younger will have access to liquor! The binge drinking issue will go from college students to high school students!! Maybe we should offer more safe drinking or binge drinking classes to those in need. I drank when I first started college but it was never binge drinking...just a few drinks here and there. When I did have too much, I learned my lesson when I felt so crappy the next day. People can make their own decisions on whether or not to drink and how much. I don't think we should lower the drinking age to encourage drinking even more for younger people. It would just cause more trouble if you ask me!

Posted by: Tom on Aug 20, 2008 at 04:41 PM
If your Military that's fine, as long as you have a Military ID. No Military Id. "NO WAY"

Posted by: Niecy on Aug 20, 2008 at 04:41 PM
I am under 21 i am 20 years old i personally do not think that the drinking age should be lowered, thats ridiculas. the younger kids already don't know how to act let alone the ones that are over 21. if they have a vote about this trust me i will vote to keep the legal drinking age at 21. it's just too many deaths as it is that is linked to drinking and driving its sad!

Posted by: tj on Aug 20, 2008 at 04:13 PM
Go ahead with the debate...but before any type of legislation lowering the age, it should have to be put to a public vote!

Posted by: Jeffrey on Aug 20, 2008 at 04:12 PM
Lowering the drinking age to 18 will be the downfall of todays youth. They are already doing things that should not be done by youth. If we lower the age to 18 then we may as well legalize pot, same thing if you think about it. This can not happen and if it ever does happen I will push for the immediate impeachment of whatever officials pass the law to allow 18 year olds to drink.

Posted by: David on Aug 20, 2008 at 04:06 PM
I would say yes, but only for military personnel. If under 21, show a military ID or its 'no'

Posted by: Just Me on Aug 20, 2008 at 03:57 PM
no do not lower the drinking age to 18 most of the 19-21 y/os are very unresponsible as it is and lower drinking to 21 will only make them worse.

Posted by: Jason on Aug 20, 2008 at 03:56 PM
Who's idea was it to lower the drinking age? I think they should raise it to 24 or 25. That way they are out of college and the drinking problems are solved. If there are parties on campus it will be easier to bust them. Raise the age do not lower it.

Posted by: Hannah on Aug 20, 2008 at 03:54 PM
doing this only gives us 18 year olds more of a reason to drive drunk. im 18 and i think it should still be 21. you dont need to drink to have fun. stupid people need to realize that. but your only killing yourself! have fun.

Posted by: Angelofdesteny7 on Aug 20, 2008 at 03:49 PM
you can go to war and fight for your country at 18, but you cant have a beer? That doesn't make alot of sense if you ask me. The drinking age needs to be lowered to 18 or the age you have to be to fight in a war should be raised to 21......

Posted by: Aaron on Aug 20, 2008 at 03:45 PM
I can't believe how hypocritical many people are. If we REALLY wanted to curb underage drinking, we would ban alcohol completely-just like all the other drugs of the same nature. We are telling our kids that alcohol is bad and not to drink it, but look at the examples they see! They see bars, alcohol in restaurants, sports venues, almost everywhere they go, there are adults using the drug. No wonder our kids drink! How can you tell someone not to use a drug that we all use and tell them its bad and kills people, but once they turn 21 its suddenly okay?? There is no legal age for drinking and driving, people of all ages do it and kill people. So make up your mind! Either legalize it for everyone or ban it! But I know we would never ban it again. We LOOOOVE our alcohol! Any "night out on the town" usually involves alcohol at some point for adults. So quit setting a bad hypocritical example for our kids, or let them use it too and learn not to be stupid with it.

Posted by: Brian on Aug 20, 2008 at 03:44 PM
I like everyone that agrees with this because of certain things they say. One comment was that some people that are 18, 19 or 20 are MORE mature then 21 year olds. I am one of those that is below 21 and can be much more mature. Don't shoot me down because I am bragging about it. It is the truth I am a responsible student and a good person.

Posted by: ANON on Aug 20, 2008 at 03:07 PM
Do you honestly think that LOWERING the drinking age will solve this problem? Please. Most high school kids are already drinking and some Jr high kids. Alcohol consumption is becoming much too poplular nowadays at a much younger age. Why don't we just make it legal for parents to buy the alcohol for them also. Geez, crack down on this problem don't encourage it.

Posted by: S on Aug 20, 2008 at 03:04 PM
Absolutely lower the drinking age. It would be a boost the economy as alcohol sales would go up. At the same time, increase the penalties for DUI. Lose your license for 10 years, plus $5000 fine, lose your car (crushed), and also pay any restitution to victims involved (if any).

Posted by: RM on Aug 20, 2008 at 02:58 PM
To Matt just because you don't hear about it does not mean that it not there. Also maybe we could adopt some of the more stricter laws and severe fines other countries have as loung as you want to adopt the lower age limits.

Posted by: Bill on Aug 20, 2008 at 02:56 PM
Javier: First of all there is no longer a draft so the only way you will go to war is to sign up so this has nothing to do with the subject. And I did join up but I never wanted to join just to drink beer grow up just a little bit if you would. And this should show that this is all most people think of is drinking and getting drunk make the age 25 or older maybe then you and the others will show a little more brains being used here.

Posted by: Kyle on Aug 20, 2008 at 02:47 PM
Steve is correct in every way. If this gets passed, younger and younger kids will start drinking. There's absolutely no reason why this should even be considered.

Posted by: Jim on Aug 20, 2008 at 02:46 PM
I was able to drink at 18 in Iowa and 19 in Nebraska. No problems.

Posted by: Renee on Aug 20, 2008 at 02:41 PM
what difference does it make they drink anyway...

Posted by: R on Aug 20, 2008 at 02:36 PM
If they had a military draft, they could take you at 18, so why shouldnt you be able to have a beer at 18????

Posted by: Mary on Aug 20, 2008 at 02:28 PM
I do not agree with changing the drinking age. There are adults that are not muture enough to drink at 30. And we are considering changing the age. Lets leave the drinking age alone and teach our kids how to be responsible about drinking. Maybe if parents showed there kids better examples at home we could consider changing it. There aready enough things to temped our children now a days. We don't need to add to it.

Posted by: Anonymous on Aug 20, 2008 at 02:12 PM
Binge drinking is not because of someone's age, it is one's own personal behaviour and lack of responsiblity. So by lowering the legal from 21 down to 18 is not going to decrease binge drinking. In fact, I beleive by lowering the legal age to 18, it will actually encourage the consumption of alcohol at a younger age and increase binge drinking. Those at that age will have an easier access to alcohol and will take advantage of that. Lowering the age limit to 18 isn't going to change anything, so leave it at 21. We already have enough drunks on the road...why add more?

Posted by: Jarbeau on Aug 20, 2008 at 01:59 PM
Responsible drinking is an oxymoron. I started drinking when I was 16. When I turned 19, the legal drinking age at that time, I quickly got bored with it and quit.

Posted by: HA! on Aug 20, 2008 at 01:57 PM
Posted by Jodie -"ARE YOU PEOPLE CRAZY! DRINKING AND DRIVING AT THE AGE OF 18. WHAT A BAD COMBINATION! WAKE UP PEOPLE!" Um, maybe you need to wake up. It's a bad combination to drink and drive at any age.

Posted by: Patrick on Aug 20, 2008 at 01:56 PM
Bob, I haven't tried pot, but when I set off 4th of July fireworks with my family, they aren't any less cool because they're legal. I know for a fact that many more fireworks are set off in my neighborhood during the legal period than during the rest of the year. And if fireworks were legal the whole year, we'd set off a whole lot more fireworks. Comparing fireworks to alcohol goes completely against what you are trying to prove. That is, YOUR analogy implies DRINKING WILL INCREASE ASTRONOMICALLY (intentional fireworks pun) if the age limit goes down!

Posted by: Anonymous on Aug 20, 2008 at 01:42 PM
Maybe lowering the drinking age would weed out some of the irresponsible people in our society.

Posted by: DDB on Aug 20, 2008 at 01:16 PM
People love mind altering drugs. Why not legalize weed or crack? They do the same thing as alchol, but I know, those drugs are different...yeah right!

Posted by: Serious? on Aug 20, 2008 at 01:15 PM
The legal drinking age now is 21, but most kids I know have already drank alcohol by the time they turn 21, and it's really not that cool anymore. If we lower the age to 18, then kids will start at, oh, 14, and by the time they are 18 it won't be that cool anymore. I suppose then we will have so many drunk 16-18 year olds, we will need to lower the age again. In no time it will be legal for kids entering kindergarten to drink. After all, they are of age to go to school.

Posted by: Greg on Aug 20, 2008 at 01:11 PM
I think this is a bad idea with little upside. Maybe I have a slanted view because I've had 2 friends die due to drunk drivers. This appears to be a case of College's wanting to rid themselves of accountability. That way they aren't held responsible if something goes wrong. Education for kids..hum young adults would need to be stepped up majorly and much stiffer penalties would need to be enforced for under age drinking or buying for minors if the law would be changed. Of course with a modification to this law especially this one more law enforcement would be needed and of course it would be added at the tax payers expense. 21 is good for now. I think colleges need to be more concerned about how to keep kids in the class rooms an less time on how to get them into the bar rooms.

Posted by: Lisa on Aug 20, 2008 at 01:10 PM
yes i think the drinking age should be lowered becaue i mean teenagers parents know that they aren't gonna be innocent forever and it's kinda obvious that they are gonna try it sooner ore later, seriously, how many times a year do teens get caught drinking by the law, we could stop that treat those who wanna drink like an adult because if they're mature enoutgh to drink they're mature enough to pay the price.

Posted by: B on Aug 20, 2008 at 12:55 PM
Why don't they just ban alcohol all together, since it really doesn't do any good to anyone. They have made marijuana illegal, which does not even come close to what the effect alcohol has on someone. I am a 34 yr old parent of 4 children, and I myself started drinking at a very young age...but as soon as I went to college, and had my first child, I completely stopped. My children were more important to me. If my sons were ever to drink, I think I would go through the roof. I won't allow it nor will I allow smoking of any kind. They definately do not need to lower the drinking age. And if anything, they should raise it or abolish it altogether. There is no good that comes out of it either way.

Posted by: Tim on Aug 20, 2008 at 12:53 PM
The law says that this is a state issue. The federal government oversteps its bounds every time it extorts a state government into doing its will and it's time for these united states to excersize their right and sue the feds anytime it tries to bully its way into state affairs. Those tax dollars they withhold are paid by citizens of states and were intended to better our country, not to be used against us.

Posted by: RM on Aug 20, 2008 at 12:50 PM
Most of the college kids that are doing the binge drinking arent off fighting the war. The drafrt ended years ago so anyone going into the military now can stop using that argument of if I can die for my country I should be able to go get drunk in public. Sound like educators just don't want to deal with the problem. Drink at home and stay ther till you sober up no problem.

Posted by: To Mom & Javier on Aug 20, 2008 at 12:47 PM
This has been said MANY TIMES before, but needs to be said again. Comparing being in the military to be intoxicated is a horrible anology and doesnt make sense.... For it or against it, PLEASE PEOPLE stop using this worn out / baseless reasoning.

Posted by: Anonymous on Aug 20, 2008 at 12:28 PM
Alritgh ! We want them to be adults but we won't treat like adults. OK you can join the military but don't do anything other than get shot at. If we lower the age of drinking then we have to make peopl be accountable for thier actions . Hence you are an adult act like one.Oh and by the way this is not the only country that has this problem.

Posted by: Marie on Aug 20, 2008 at 12:25 PM
Sure, lower it. If you can vote and join the military at age 18, you should be able to drink and smoke. However, I do not believe this will solve any problems. If this theory were to work, then we should legalize marijuana too!!! Wouldn't that be less dangerous than drunk driving, binging, etc...

Posted by: T on Aug 20, 2008 at 12:22 PM
I say there shouldn't be an age limit set...make it 16 or 18 for everything, drinking, smoking, driving...once the novelty of the new law passes...there will be less of an issue, because it won't be illegal, and therefore, not as fun. It doesnt matter if kids are in college or high school, they will drink, smoke, whatever. Just lower everything to 18...call it good...and paretns educate your children! My parents didn't give us a curfew or anything, just told us we know what is right...and guess what...none of the 4 of us ever took advantage of it...let go of the reigns and allow your kids to decide for themselves what is right and what is wrong. Dont allow the government to dictate your childrens futures.

Posted by: T on Aug 20, 2008 at 12:17 PM
Regardless of what age the individual is, an 18 year old will find a way to get alcohol. It's going to happen, however, at least at 18 when they are caught with it there are consequences and therefore they are more likely to be cautious when they turn 21. Keep it at 21. Keep them and any innocent victims alive 3 years longer.

Posted by: Javier on Aug 20, 2008 at 11:56 AM
If I can go to war and defend my country I should be able to have a beer back home if I want.

Posted by: AnotherMother on Aug 20, 2008 at 11:53 AM
Yes, lower it. Drunk/high students are a issue now, and they were all four years I was in high school -- even though the legal age was raised to 21 mid-way through. Delusions of immortality are an intrinsic part of being a young person. Take away the mystique of drinking, tax it, and zero tolerance for anyone (of any age) driving after drinking. Make public transit more affordable and widely available with the legal tax profits from it. And parent your children if you want them to behave well!!! Wake up Omaha indeed -- your kids are already drinking at 18.

Posted by: Mom on Aug 20, 2008 at 11:48 AM
if you can die for our country....let them take the responsibility that goes along with drinking on as well....They CAN handle it!

Posted by: Steve on Aug 20, 2008 at 11:20 AM
Well, let's put it this way...in my opinion. If the age is lowered to 18, the next thing you know is that kids 15 & 16 years old will drink more, cause more accidents, get in more trouble with the law & inevitably kill someone drinking & driving. Think of when YOU were 16. Because most of us know that you WER drinking & driving at that age but got lucky & never got caught. The justice system has zero tolerance for this kind of behavior & ANYONE FOR THIS IDEA IS A BUNCH OF APPLES SHY OF A BUSHEL ! ! ! YOU'RE OUT OF YOUR MINDS IF YOU THINK THIS IS OK ! ! !

Posted by: Chris on Aug 20, 2008 at 11:18 AM
The drinking age when I was a a kid was 18, I was in the bars (with a fake ID) and drinking when I was 16. This was many, many years ago. I say lets try it, but back then we did not have the police on our tails like they do now. I am almost 50 and am afraid to drink (even a little) and drive. I say let them lower the age see how they do. I believe kids are more mature now then when I was younger. At least lets hope so. The police are more alert and are scouting for drunk drivers than yesteryear. I have never had a dui in my entire life. But then again I don't drink now as I did when I was a teenager. Many of my friends did go through that when we were all younger tho. Give them a chance, lets see if they can handle the adult situations that most of them are already in now.

Posted by: DHB on Aug 20, 2008 at 11:09 AM
NO! Lowering the drinking age will not stop binge drinking...I'm in my mid-40s and I still binge drink every once in awhile. An 18-year old isn't mature enough to know when to say when. As far as being old enough to be deployed and old enough to vote, I would be more in favor to compromise at age 19 and if you are under 21 you can only buy 3.2 beer, no hard liquor at all and only certain types of wines. Then and ONLY then would I be in favor of it...also designating certain bars for the age 18-21 crowd ONLY and other bars for age 21 and above. PERIOD. By the way, they don't allow alcohol in the Middle East (or so they say) so I don't think that's much of an argument. Also, couldn't states lose Federal highway funds if they lowered the drinking age? They were in danger of losing $$ if they didn't lower the legal limit to 0.08, so I don't see how this is ANY different.

Posted by: Nicole on Aug 20, 2008 at 11:00 AM
I think getting a license at the age of 18 and smoking and drinking at 21. What age makes you a responsible adult?

Posted by: ron diaz on Aug 20, 2008 at 10:54 AM
The universities are not calling for the drinking age to be lowered. They are calling for the drinking age of 21 and its relation to binge drinking by students to be reviewed, since the 21 age doesn't seem to be working. Heaven forbid we allow a logical debate on something like this.

Posted by: Omaha Kid on Aug 20, 2008 at 10:46 AM
That may help with binge drinking, but will most likely increase drunks on the road.

Posted by: amanda on Aug 20, 2008 at 10:46 AM
i dont understand how it will lower binge drinking? but thats me. i think its rediculous to give the 18 year olds a responsibility to choose how much alcohol they drink legally. 18 year olds are generally immature. hence why they binge drink once they get to college out of parents supervision. legal or not. i just think its BS that they think its going to improve it. make the kids responisble for there actions when they get caught under age! leave it at 21!

Posted by: matt on Aug 20, 2008 at 10:42 AM
In Korea (and most other countries) the legal drinking age is 18 and you rarely hear about problems with it. Perhaps it's time that America look to other countries for some guidance on how things work.

Posted by: john on Aug 20, 2008 at 10:15 AM
If you DO serve your country then YES...If you dont serve your country and Mommy and Daddy make up excuses for you when you do something stupid while drunk...Absolutly not. This day and age Mommys and Daddys make up excuses for thier kids behavior instead of having them own up to what they do. So with that said let them wait or serve thier country and I'll buy them one.

Posted by: Anonymous on Aug 20, 2008 at 10:09 AM
Teach people to be accountable for there actions, and they will learn the consequences of bad behavior. You want to drink yourself to death, then the university can't stop you even if you are 18. Be smart, and learn from others mistakes.

Posted by: Barbara on Aug 20, 2008 at 10:08 AM
Ask anyone who has worked in a bar or night club and they will say to raise it to 26. No one under 26 (and some of them) can actually deal with this huge responsibility! What are you people thinking?

Posted by: ct on Aug 20, 2008 at 09:52 AM
Well then, if all anybody does when they reach drinking age is go crazy, why not raise the drinking age to 30, or 40, or 50? Why not just ban alcohol again? It worked so well the first time.Quite honestly, there really shouldn't even be a drinking age. Start parenting and quit letting the government do it for you.

Posted by: Steve on Aug 20, 2008 at 09:47 AM
Have many forgotten the "experiment" where Iowa lowered the age to 18 in the 70's & early 80's and all the resulting problems that occurred? There is a big difference between 21 year old and 18 year olds. However if you have the courage to step up to join the armed forces of this country you should be able to drink responsibly. After boot camp many of these children becomes men and women of character beyond their civilian peers.

Posted by: Mom on Aug 20, 2008 at 09:45 AM
It is more the problem that there is no teaching going on in the homes of these kids starting when they are very young. We need to not shelter our kids. When someone is killed because of binge drinking or drunk driving we need to let our kids see it on t.v. and talk to them about the reality of it. We need to do more ed. in our elementary schools and upper grades, including the colleges. We need to put God back in the schools and teach our kids right from wrong instead of letting them make all of their own choices because we want to be their friend and not a parent. We all need to get back to teaching good morals and values starting when they are little. It makes me so sad to see how society trys to solve problems. We need to go back to not pushing our kids so hard and making them feel that they are never good enough. Instead being honest with them about the true dangers of this world. Using a little guilt and teaching them to respect themselves and adults. It starts at home.

Posted by: Anonymous on Aug 20, 2008 at 09:36 AM
How about we just make it that everything happens at 21. Voting, drinking, going to war. I think that if my children aren't able to handle the freedom then I should still be able to claim them on my income taxes until they are 21 years old. I am not a proponent of teenage drinking, but I also believe that if the laws are going to treat them as adults in some areas then they should be treated as adults in all areas.

Posted by: Reaslistik on Aug 20, 2008 at 09:31 AM
Yes! Lower the drinking age and increase the age you can get a driver’s license. Make the legal drinking age 16 and the age you can get a driver’s license be 18 (like in Europe). The 2 years lag will teach you how to drink and what is your ‘upper limit’. In addition, during your first year of driving you should have a magnetic sign on the rear and front windows of the car you are driving to alert other drivers –and police- that you are a ‘novice’ driver.

Posted by: Anonymous on Aug 20, 2008 at 09:25 AM
The drinking age should not be lowered. The college students are only looking at their own wants and how much easier it would be to purchase alcohol. People need to educate these students that their bodies (mainly the liver) is not mature enough to handle alcohol. An individuals liver isn't fully developed until about the age of 21. Yes, it might help with making binge drinking legal but what about the long term health affects it might have on these young people.

Posted by: me on Aug 20, 2008 at 09:23 AM
I think the drinking age should be kept at 21. I don't think lowering the drinking age will stop kids from binge drinking. The reason the colleges are all behind this is because their hope is that if the drinking age is lowered to 18, the drinking will start at an earlier age and the colleges are hoping that any binge drinking that takes place, takes place before the kids get to college, so the binge drinking aftermath (i.e., death, etc.) is not the college's problem. If the drinking age is lowered to 18, younger people will be drinking AND getting behind the wheel. This will increase the number of people driving under the influence on the streets - is this something that anyone else wants? Not me. If someone drinks enough to die from alcohol poisoning - does it really matter what the legal drinking age is?

Posted by: Anna on Aug 20, 2008 at 09:13 AM
Driving at 16 is scary enough, but if they lower the drinking age drivers with just 2 years of driving experience will be able to drink alcohol legally. That is crazy!

Posted by: Elizabeth on Aug 20, 2008 at 09:13 AM
I feel that if you are old enough to enlist in the service and die for your country, you are definitely old enough to have a beer. It's ridiculous!

Posted by: Anonymous on Aug 20, 2008 at 09:03 AM
I think we should raise the drinking age to 24. That also solves the problem of some college kids having it and some not! Your brain doesn't finish growing until 24 anyway, so most 21 yr olds are still "kids" making stupid decisions.

Posted by: Paul on Aug 20, 2008 at 09:02 AM
I see it as a rather simple matter. The law recognizes 18yr olds (or some as 19) as adults. They should then be afforded EVERY right that comes with that title. If the law deems them responsible enough in every other manner (from marriage, driving, military service, gun ownership, crimes committed, etc.) then they are responsible enough to be given the RIGHT to choose to drink or not. If they choose to be irresponsible, then they are to be punished accordingly.

Posted by: James on Aug 20, 2008 at 09:00 AM
Too young for alcohol. Too young for war.

Posted by: JODIE on Aug 20, 2008 at 08:42 AM
ARE YOU PEOPLE CRAZY! DRINKING AND DRIVING AT THE AGE OF 18. WHAT A BAD COMBINATION! WAKE UP PEOPLE!

Posted by: Chris on Aug 20, 2008 at 08:41 AM
I am a parent with a sophmore college student. The drinking age for me was 19. I did not go crazy and I don't believe my child will either. I am in favor of 19 being the age that it is legal to drink. I rented an apartment at 19, I could sign contracts, I believe I was adult at 19. My child is very mature at the age of 19 and if there is not a strong tabu for drinking, it will be no big deal. I never understood why the age was raised to 21 when the legal adult age is 19 in Nebraska.

Posted by: Kristi on Aug 20, 2008 at 08:40 AM
THIS IS THE WORST IDEA I EVER HEARD! Yes, please! Give the ability to 18 year olds not only to drink legally but to be able to buy it legally. Here is something to think about Nebraska....when my friends and I were 15 and 16, and wanted to drink to be "cool" we didn't know ANY 21 year olds to supply the alcohol...therefore, we just didn't drink because we had no buyer. But guess how many 18 year olds we knew??? At least 5 or 6, all of them would have been willing to buy it for us had it been legal. DO YOU SEE WHERE I AM GOING WITH THIS STORY? If you legalize it for 18 year olds you are also opening up a whole new world of opportunity for the new underage group of drinkers...the under 18 group.....This state is unreal.

Posted by: Joe on Aug 20, 2008 at 08:39 AM
Well teaching responsibility starts well before 21. Children should be taught responsibility and personal accountability well before they "head off to college". If this were the case it really wouldn't be an issue if the law was 18 or 21. I also agree with the fact that if you are old enough to die for your country in a war you are old enough to decide wether or not you should be able to drink. PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY, is becoming a thing of the past in this country and it is so sad.

Posted by: Darren on Aug 20, 2008 at 08:37 AM
21 years olds have a death rate in auto accidents where alcohol was a factor of 173 in 100,000 drivers. For each year of age it decreases, to the point that 40 year olds have a death rate in similar accidents of 8 in 100,000 drivers. So the logical thing to do is lower the drinking age and kill even more kids that are not yet mature enough to handle alcohol, much less alcohol and driving. Ridiculous!

Posted by: Anonymous on Aug 20, 2008 at 08:17 AM
Age is only a number. Responsibility is the key to any task. I have meet 18 year olds who are more responbsible than some 21 year olds.

Posted by: J on Aug 20, 2008 at 08:17 AM
When I was in college, the legal drinking age was 18 in Iowa, 19 in Nebraska. So, we all went to Iowa! But of course, that was back in the days when you graduated high school at 17, not being held back until you were 6 and then started school. Make the age 19 to eliminate the high school factor. This is ridiculous that our servicemen and women cannot legally enjoy a beer after serving in Iraq and Afghanistan - but can come back in a flag-draped coffin - all under the age of 21. We trust 18 year olds with the vote. 19 year olds are legally emancipated in Nebraska - that means for legal purposes they are adults and can enter into contracts, marry without permission, buy houses - but can't have a glass of wine or a can of beer. Are they or are they not adults?

Posted by: mike on Aug 20, 2008 at 08:14 AM
If you think this is to reduce crime, you're not getting the point. They don't want kids to binge drink. When you can't buy your own beer, you're more likely to go too far whenever you have the chance. If you're 18 or 19 and can buy beer anytime you want, it won't make downing as many as you can get in feel like a necessity. I don't think its a horrible plan, but one that needs to be studied more to see if it will make a significant enough difference to implement.

Posted by: DDB on Aug 20, 2008 at 08:07 AM
So the Presidents of these schools believe that lowering the drinking age will stop binge drinking? How? In what way will this stop binge drinking? The reason given in the story doesn't make any sense. Do they really think that older kids will stop purchasing the product for younger kids? How does lowering the age regulate out of control peer drinking? I would like one President of a school to explain their reasoning and then back it up with data. Here is another question for everyone, Why is it that some drugs are illegal and others are not. Alchol is responsible for so many deaths every year but we band smoking? What is the difference? I love America and its screwed up laws backed by stupid reasoning.

Posted by: Anonymous on Aug 20, 2008 at 08:01 AM
There was binge drinking when I was 18 and the legal age was 18. Blah Blah

Posted by: Bob on Aug 20, 2008 at 07:35 AM
I think the age should be higher. Kids can't drive now because they are all on cell phones. Yeah, let's add alcohol to that and she what happens from there. The majority of people turning 21 are too immature to handle themselves when it comes to drinking. They drink too much and think they are invincible. Maybe they should raise the age to enter the military. I think it's ridiculous to even think about lowering the legal drinking age. Wake up Omaha!!!

Posted by: Joel on Aug 20, 2008 at 07:33 AM
I like how Bryan says "military members at the age of 18 may drink on base." Well what about the 18 or 19 year olds that vote, sign leases, swipe credit cards, buy tobacco, play the lottery, and get married, all things that minors can't do? I say lower it to 19, put a zero tolerance on driving if alcohol is consumed until they are 21. They can either walk or take a cab to a bar or wherever. Also make them take a class about alcohol abuse and give them another id to prove they took the class.

Posted by: Jim on Aug 20, 2008 at 07:32 AM
I agree! Simply lowering the drinking age is NOT the answer. There needs to be oversight to the introduction to alcohol consumption...the mind & body can NOT handle alcohol as fast or as much as anyone can drink it. Everyone must pace themselves & lets face it, that rarely happens. Age is irrelevant...it applys to ALL of us! I suggest drug and alcohol seminar in Junior High, High School, AND College. It's great that Elementary schools have DARE, but the information needs to be reintroduced periodically as they get older. Sixth graders have little problem saying NO to drugs & alcohol. AND yes, parents need to talk to their kids (at ALL ages) about it & set a good example for them to follow. Kids DO get out of control when they get that "freedom" in College, but laying the foundation of knowledge and responsibility when they are young, goes a long way to protect them throughout their "adult" lives. With that said, I think the age should be lowered to 19 for the reasons previously blogged.

Posted by: Tim on Aug 20, 2008 at 07:31 AM
Hey we have done that before and then put it back to 21 they did it when I was in college and For some reason it keeps coming back to 21 Safety Is the big factor Drinking and driving Lets think this one through several times before we make a mistake again Our children are to inportant to us to do this to them Heck there are enough people out there that are a lot older that can't handle it Thanks and thats all I am going to say about the Just watch IT IS A BAD THING.

Posted by: come on people on Aug 20, 2008 at 07:22 AM
WHY lower it? you should raise it to 25. look at how many people over 21 got a DUI in the last year! either keep it at 21 or RAISE it to a more mature age.

Posted by: Mary Ann on Aug 20, 2008 at 07:17 AM
Absolutely, NO! At age 21 some of our children are not ready to handle alcohol. Look at the problems you read in the paper everyday! Accidents......deaths....many divorces are the result of alcohol. Why do kids think they need it??

Posted by: Rob on Aug 20, 2008 at 06:08 AM
As a parent of 2 college students I am opposed to any drinking age limit. First it teaches young people that you can ignore the law. It develops into a general lack of respect for the law when the law is unenforceable, or even worse, selectively enforced. Kids are perceptive to double standards. Why not support developing more responsible behavior instead? Waiting until an individual is on their own and free from any parental guidance to begin experimenting with alcohol makes absolutely no sense to me. Teaching them to make responsible choices begins in the home. IMHO, binge drinking is a phenomenon caused in large part by prohibition. I also believe that this behavior is unique to our country, an not necessarily isolated to the American University campus culture. Prohibition is not the answer.

Posted by: concerned on Aug 20, 2008 at 05:14 AM
If you give your life for your country it's one thing, but if you take the lives of others when you're driving it's another thing. How many 18 year olds do you think would give their keys to someone else or call for a ride when they're too intoxicated to drive? There are enough drunks on the roads now killing other people.

Posted by: ANONYMOUS on Aug 20, 2008 at 04:04 AM
My answer to this is NO. How do you explain to a grieving parent that their beloved 18 year old child died because they drank themselves to death? Lowering the drinking age is NOT going to work. Plus, with the technology today, kids under 18 can make up some pretty decent fake IDs. Dumb idea. I realize college is the time for pulling away and setting your own rules, but drinking yourself to death is no answer.

Posted by: High Schooler Mom on Aug 20, 2008 at 03:30 AM
How many of us have kids that will be 18 before they graduate from high school? They will be able to legally drink. This could bring up a whole new issue at the schools, drunk students. Do we really want to go there? Don't we have a hard enough time keeping our high school students on track.

Posted by: Kate on Aug 20, 2008 at 02:39 AM
I am so tired of hearing the military excuse as a reason to drop the drinking age to 18. If they want to lower the drinking age for the consistency of privledges as an adult, than raise the age of a legal adult to 21. I can just see all the high school seniors going to the bar after school. Great idea! I can't believe that anyone in this society, where there are already an overwhelming about of alcohol related accidents and deaths, that this is even being considered.

Posted by: Bryan on Aug 20, 2008 at 01:29 AM
Well I guess every time a law is broken we should just throw up our hands and make it legal. Speed limits broken often? There answer is to make it higher or get rid of it altogether. The arguement that if a kid wants to sign up to the military he should be able to drink is already taken care of. Military members at the age of 18 may drink while on base. This is nothing more than universities wanting to wash their hands of a problem that is placed in their laps because of age. 18 as the drinking age would mean they would not have to speed time and money enforcing drinking laws or regulations. Keep it were it is at 21.

Posted by: Tim on Aug 20, 2008 at 01:15 AM
If you are an adult (18 or 19 depending on the state) you are an adult. All of the rights AND responsibilities should be yours. Period.

Posted by: Bob on Aug 19, 2008 at 11:57 PM
As a college age kid, I can tell you that many kids arrive to school, and go way over board. Mostly when they turn 21. I drank a few times through high school, and I quickly learned how to handle it, then, when I was around it a lot in college, I knew what i needed to know. Lowering the legal age to 18 off sets the idea a person is an adult at 18, but not adult enough to go to a bar with his friends. 19 is acceptable, to counter the high school connection. Many times, kids go to school, and when they arrive they have never experienced drinking, and often go too far and are unable to handle it. Being below 21 doesn't mean they will not be around it, an I can promise you, they ARE around it. Lowering the age will take some of the fun of obtaining booze. Much like Pot, fireworks, and other illegal items, when it's legal, the "coolness" is gone. Our society needs to get kids to want to be adults, this is one way to offer that chance, because they will have to accept the resonsibility.

Posted by: JS on Aug 19, 2008 at 11:26 PM
The thing i find interesting is that at 18 you are given the ability to sign your life away and go give your life for the country and most states are considered a legal adult. but you are still to young to decide wether or not to use alcohol

Posted by: Student on Aug 19, 2008 at 11:25 PM
This is ridiculous. I hope people have enough sense to know what kind of message they're sending to their kids. As a Sophomore in college, freshmans are already tremendously immature, why contrubute to the cause. I know because people are getting caught..... so what, millions die everyday from alcohol. In car accidents, poisoning, liver failure, and so on, "Are we at a point where we no longer care about our societies?" That's like putting coke in cola again and saying, "We can control who it will affect". Let's be smart! Scientifically we can prove they are not mature at 18,male and female, so why condone what society has already deemed wrong. Occasionally, I have a drink, however, because alcohol wasn't easily accessible earlier, it is an occaional thing. I know alot of people who began drinking early on and now it's an issue. All I'm saying....... Give the kids a chance!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Bob Simth on Aug 19, 2008 at 11:19 PM
of course Creighton U. is in favor to lowering dringking age.. they have a bar on campus and want a larger crowd by lowering the dringing age

Posted by: George on Aug 19, 2008 at 11:16 PM
Oh my god, they can't be serious! Lowering the drinking age to 'reduce' binge drinking! The only thing this is going to do is increase the drinking problem! If these colleges really expect the problem to decrease, they need to get a reality check! THe first thing many (but not all) 18 year olds are going to do is go out and drink since the colleges would make it (hopefully NOT) legal! This is a terrible and very stupid idea! I hate to hear the excuses a college gives a parent when a student binge drinks themselves to death. Stupid, stupid idea!!!

Posted by: Baruch Resendiz on Aug 19, 2008 at 10:59 PM
If at 18 you are able to vote and go to war for our country you should be able to drink. Baruch Resendiz age 30 married father of 3