TB Case Investigated
TB Case Investigated Save Email Print
Risk considered to be low
Posted: 5:25 PM Jul 24, 2008
Last Updated: 9:55 PM Jul 24, 2008

A | A | A

State and metro health officials are looking into a case of tuberculosis. Tests have been conducted on those who have been in contact with the person. Health officials say this is a low-risk case.

The Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services is working with the Douglas County Health Department and the Sarpy/Cass Department of Health and Wellness to investigate the case of an adult who has active tuberculosis and to do follow-up on those who have had extended exposure to that person.

“People who had extended, close exposure to the individual will be tested for TB and will be given preventive treatment if their tests are positive,” said Dr. Joann Schaefer, Chief Medical Officer and Director of the Division of Public Health. Ten co-workers of the individual were tested and the results were negative.

Anyone can get TB but people who are especially at risk are members of the same household as an active case of the disease. The greater the degree of personal contact, the greater the risk of becoming infected with the disease.

“We are bringing this to people’s attention because, although it is a low risk, people may hear about it in the community and we want to reassure them,” she said.

TB is spread through things like coughing although most organizaitons say you must have prolonged contact with the infected person.

Associate professor Tody Schonfeld teaches at the University of Nebraska Medical Center and deals with questions of when one person's health becomes a public concern and how much information should be released.

She says there are both regulations, in terms of state and federal law as well as hospital policies, that enable us to ensure patient information is kept confidential between the patient and the health care providers."

In Nebraska's most recent TB case, that is happening.

Schonfeld explains there are many reasons for not giving more information about this infected person even though he or she could be walking among us. The main one is that a loss of trust could lead to a bigger public health risk.

Schonfeld says, "In a case of contagious disease, it's really important that patients seek treatment when they have something that could affect the public and if they're worried about their information won't remain private, that the information about themselves or the disease will get out, then they're less likely to seek out treatment in the first place or be open with providers when they go to see them."

Symptoms of tuberculosis include: a bad cough that lasts more than three weeks; pain in the chest; fatigue and weight loss.

More Stories
Park East Store Burglarized

Protection Order Violations

Family Mourns Loss Of Loved One

Man Critically Wounded by Gunfire in South Omaha

Gun Violation Found On MySpace

Fire at Omaha Apartment Complex Blamed on Electrical Problem

Ralston Celebrates Independence Day

Holiday Weekend Fireworks Displays

Post Your Comments
First Name:
Location:
Enter Comments: characters left
Email (optional):
By posting this comment I have read and agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy:
You must agree to the Terms of Service to continue.
Read Comments
Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
Posted by: llr on Jul 25, 2008 at 12:32 PM
I do think they could release enough information to put some minds at ease, without releasing the actual identity of the patient. Now instead of just a few hundred worried people, there are a few hundred THOUSAND throughout Douglas County who are concerned they may have come into contact with this individual.

Posted by: Laura on Jul 25, 2008 at 10:51 AM
Brian, protecting the private health information of American citizens isn't liberal. It's protecting the privacy rights of American citizens, including those with curable infectious diseases. I hate to be cliche, but put yourself in this place. It's not a child molester or a drunk driver. It's a person with a bacterial infection which is being treated. Could as easily be any of us.

Posted by: Nicole on Jul 25, 2008 at 08:13 AM
Brian - I very much agree with you. I also think that the people he or she may have forgotten they had contact with during the contagious period should at least be able to see this person's name and be able to contact authorities to let them know they need tested, too.

Posted by: Brian on Jul 24, 2008 at 08:55 PM
"Schonfeld explains there are many reasons for not giving more information about this infected person even though he or she could be walking among us. The main one is that a loss of trust could lead to a bigger public health risk." - They could be walking among us and it's contagious and deadly is the very reason that the identity should be made known. This is a public health issue. We should have rights. Gotta love them liberals.

Special Sections