Crime Lab, Investigators Under The Microscope
Crime Lab, Investigators Under The Microscope Save Email Print
Wrongful arrest lawsuit filed in 2006 Murdock murder case
Posted: 11:24 PM Jun 18, 2008
Last Updated: 12:32 AM Jun 19, 2008
Email Address: sixonline@wowt.com

A | A | A

The head of the Douglas County Crime Lab is on paid administrative leave while the lab, Nebraska State Patrol and Cass County Sheriff's Department are being sued in connection with how a murder investigation was handled two years ago.

It stems from a double murder case in Cass County. The initial scrutiny centered on Nebraska State Patrol and Cass County investigators and includes the crime lab because the two initial suspects spent several months in jail only to be released because they weren't involved in the murder after all.

"I'm innocent, I had absolutely nothing to do with this," said Matthew Livers in December of 2006. When Livers left the Cass County Jail a free man in December 2006 he had lost seven months of his life.

Livers had confessed in April 2006 to the murders of his aunt and uncle, Sharmon and Wayne Stoke, shot to death in their Murdock home. Nine days later, Livers was picked up at his home by the state patrol and Cass County sheriff and, according to the wrongful arrest lawsuit, for the next 11 hours he was interrogated.

He told investigators 102 times that he had nothing to do with his aunt and uncle's deaths. Livers, who was 28 at the time, has the IQ of a young child. His lawyers say the 103rd time he was asked about the murders he said he did it along with a friend, Nicholas Sampson. At the time, Livers' attorney said he felt threatened by the death penalty.

"Matt perceived the officers and the interrogation as a threat to his life and as a consequence he made up the story,” attorney Julie Bear said in December 2006.

Now two years later, the Nebraska State Patrol and Cass County Sheriff's Department are under the subpoena microscope and a civil suit and so is the Douglas County Crime Lab. The man in charge of the lab, David Kofoed, is on paid administrative leave pending an internal investigation.

CSI examined the car Livers and Sampson had used and found no blood in it. Later on, the crime lab was asked by the state patrol to go through it again. Kofoed found a trace amount of blood under the dashboard consistent with one of the victim's blood.

Livers' attorneys want to know how the blood got there. It's one of many questions a judge will examine sometime next year.
Douglas County Sheriff Tim Dunning says he's proud of the crime lab and that this action was taken for the sole purpose of maintaining its integrity.

A Wisconsin couple with no apparent connection to Livers and Sampson are serving life sentences for the Murdock murders.

More Stories
Fireworks Show Threatened By Rain

Holiday Weekend Fireworks Displays

Fireworks Injury Victim Warns Others

Woman Stabbed Multiple Times

Update: Owner of Pit Bulls Cited

Barking Upsets Neighbors

Historian Follows In Ancestor's Footsteps

Palin Resigns As Alaska Governor

Post Your Comments
First Name:
Location:
Enter Comments: characters left
Email (optional):
By posting this comment I have read and agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy:
You must agree to the Terms of Service to continue.
Read Comments
Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
Posted by: Chris on Jun 22, 2008 at 03:04 PM
Hey, "not applicable," of course the 5th Amendment applies. He DID in fact incriminate himself, whether or not he committed the crime. He was a suspect during the interrogation, so the angle of the interrogation was to get him to confess (i.e. self incriminate). He wasn't being interrogated as a witness against someone else, where the 5th Amendment wouldn't apply. This was all about him, and this is another example of why our forefathers included the 5th Amendment in the Bill of Rights!

Posted by: Anonymous on Jun 21, 2008 at 04:45 PM
CSI's do NOT interrogate suspects, I think someone's feeling the 'csi' effect too much and watching grissom.CSI's examine,collect and process evidence.

Posted by: Charlie on Jun 20, 2008 at 01:41 PM
Hey Mayberry! You got some problems with OPD!?!?!?

Posted by: The Original Cop on Jun 19, 2008 at 02:11 PM
Mayberry- OPD HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH THIS CASE!!

Posted by: not applicable on Jun 19, 2008 at 12:18 PM
The 5th Amendment provides against the right of self incrimination. If he had nothing to do with it, the 5th Amandment is not applicable. Everyone wants to through that around since the OJ trial put that LA cop on the stand.

Posted by: Anonymous on Jun 19, 2008 at 12:06 PM
yes he was put in jail for seven months, but he confessed. Maybe next time he will ask for a lawyer before the 103rd time of saying he didn't have anything to do with it. Punitive damages are always a problem, because you are playing on the sympathy of a jury.

Posted by: Sheri on Jun 19, 2008 at 11:51 AM
It says in the article above that this man has the IQ of a child. To me this would mean he has some sort of disability, be it learning, emotional, physical...I do not believe he would have even known to invoke the 5th Amendment. This being said, the officers interrogating this man should have had a clue after questioning him long enough to get over 100 denials of the charges should have ended it. Even if they believed he did it, they should have had him mentally evaluated to determine whether or not he was capable of withstanding the interrogation. This man should be compensated. I don't know about $10 million, but his time is worth something.

Posted by: HMG on Jun 19, 2008 at 11:21 AM
VERY interesting devolopments I must say. So much for being the BEST in the state when you have to PLANT evidence to get the outcome you had hoped for! Makes me sick! The douglas County Sherrif's office is getting pretty bad these days!

Posted by: jj on Jun 19, 2008 at 10:09 AM
WE COULD USE A REAL CRIME LAB,BUT OFCOURSE WE HAVE OTHER PRIORITIES,A WALKING BRIDGE ACROSS THE RIVER,AND A NEW BASEBALL STADIUM. WHAT ELSE DO YOU WANT?

Posted by: To: Mayberry on Jun 19, 2008 at 09:55 AM
The Douglas County crime lab is separate from that of the Omaha Police Department Crime Lab. Douglas County is associated more so with the Sheriff's Office, while OPD's is that of OPD. And how do you say that 10 million dollars will help their emotional and mental anguish when right before that you said he should have invoked his 5th Amendment right- had he invoked his right don't you think this could have been preventable (I'm not saying it could have been, it's just a possibility)? Even if he is awarded a settlement, many states have laws as to what can be recovered (if anything!) out of a wrongful imprisonment law suit and usually there's a cap on what can be given.

Posted by: mayberry on Jun 19, 2008 at 07:10 AM
If you tell an investigator you did not have anything to do with a crime 100 plus times . . that certainly should be enough. Insert your 5th amendmendment right and say nothing. I think 10 million each should help with their mental and emotional anguish. OPD investigators should serve time in jail for planting evidence and re-evaluate their (in-terror-gation) techniques, unfortunately their are crooks behind the badge too.

Special Sections