MONDAY ON NBC, it's an all new two hour return of the American Gladiators with new Gladiators and new events. Then on ten at ten, imagine going through an expensive medical treatment and having the money from a fundraiser just disappear. Could this happen to you? Mike McKnight investigates what questions you should ask before handing your money over to someone who promises a surefire investment. "Show Me My Money", Monday at ten only on 6 News.
The Weather Authority
Currents
Doppler Radar
7-Day
Find a Local Business with Local Lookup
 
WOWT.com on Demand
  • 6 On Your Cell
  • RSS Feeds
  • Desktop Alert
    		•
  • Text Alerts
  • Daily E-News
  • What’s on 6
    • MarketPlace
  • Restaurants
  • Auto Map
  • Business Connections
  • Financial Advice
  • Legal Advice
  • New Home Listings
  • Your Home, Your Investment
  • Entertainment
  • Recipes
  • Education
  • Jobs
  • The Wedding Planner
  • Martha's Tip of the Day
  • Advertise With WOWT
    • Dog Bites Renew Debate Save Email Print
    Posted: 9:36 PM Mar 27, 2008
     Last Updated: 1:39 PM Mar 28, 2008
    106 comments
    A | A | A

    When an Omaha man was bitten by two pit bulls on Wednesday, a familiar debate was renewed in the metro. Whenever there are incidents like this, strong reactions surface on both sides.

    One of the pit bulls involved in Wednesday's incident remains quarantined at the Nebraska Humane Society. The other was shot by a police officer.

    Meanwhile, Hopeton Hewett is recovering after being bitten on the arm.

    "They grabbed me and pulled me perhaps about 10 feet," the 76-year-old Hewett said.

    The dogs stopped attacking Hewett and ran away. Officers ended up killing one and the other was taken to the Humane Society.

    The attack may be unfairly focusing attention on pit bulls and unfairly labeling them as vicious, says Pam Weise of the Humane Society.

    "All pit bulls are not bad," she says.

    "I put a lot of the blame on owners of pit bulls who do not socialize them properly," Weise says. "I put a lot of blame on the breeders of pit bills who do not breed for the best tendencies but in fact breed for the worst."

    Pit bull attacks prompted Council Bluffs to take action in 2004.

    City council member Lynne Branigan says, "With the incidents that we had been seeing here in Council Bluffs I just felt it was a very, very much a public safety issue."

    Council Bluffs banned pit bulls and Branigan says it's been largely effective.

    "The number of incidents that have been reported have been almost zero, since the ban has been in place," Branigan says.

    To keep what happened to Hopeton Hewett from happening again, Lynne Branigan has some advice for Omaha.

    "I would encourage the city council over in Omaha to look at a similar ban but get ready for months and months of controversy."

    Our calls to the president and vice president of the Omaha City Council were not returned. For now, only the leash law applies to pit bulls as a breed in Omaha.

    While Council Bluffs put a ban in place, the dogs have not vanished. Those that were in the Bluffs when the ban took effect were grandfathered in.
    Email  del.icio.us   Google   Yahoo  digg
    More Stories
    Bond Set for Three of Four in Marriott Melee

    Alleged Assailant Falls Through System Cracks

    Alleged Theft Investigated

    Jury Splits on Assault Decision

    		 Major Omaha Street Closed

    Shooting Investigation

    Kristin's Crash Course in Mobile Threats

    Teens Need to Get the Text Message
    Post Your Comments
    First Name:
    Location:
    Enter Comments: characters left
    Email (optional):
    Email will not be displayed on site. For station contact purpose only.
    Read Comments
    Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
    Posted by: jimmie Location: omaha on Apr 5, 2008 at 08:35 PM
    PEOPLE ARE IGNORANT ABOUT WHAT THEY DONT UNERSTAND I THINK THEY NEED TO STOP JUDGEING DOGS WE SEE ALL THIS CRIME BUT WE DONT SIT THERE AND SAY BAN ALL BLACKS WHITE OR MEXICANS GROW UP LETS BAN RAT TERRIORS THEY WERE BRED TO KILL TOO DO YOUR RESEARCH THEN YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO SAY SOMTHING UNTIL THEN KEEP YOUR OPINION TO YOURSELF
    Posted by: John Location: Omaha on Apr 2, 2008 at 12:30 PM
    J-try workingpitbull.com and pitbulllovers.com. Now I think it only fair that you list your sources. It's easy to claim anonymously that you have a BS in animal behavior but BS can stand for alot things
    Posted by: Anonymous Location: omaha on Apr 1, 2008 at 05:59 PM
    Notice the sterotyping of all pit owners.
    Posted by: M Location: Omaha on Apr 1, 2008 at 08:47 AM
    Territory is a very important aspect of owning any dog. Territory must never be allowed to extend to other peoples property, whether private or public. All dogs can be trained if given the chance. It is the responsibility of the owner to train their dogs. I do not believe this a problem specific to the breed. People are just too overwhelmed or maybe too lazy to put this effort into their dogs. The neighborhood I am in has had those that just open the door and let their dogs run. I have even met those that no matter how many times the pound comes they still feel it is their right to intimidate the neighbors who might be afraid. The dog was named DIABLO and taught to hunt cat. My husband & I do not fear dogs so the dog always backed down. Dogs sense fear. The older man who was dragged I am sure was very afraid, this fuels the response of the dogs. This does not make it this man's fault, it does however make it imperative to not ever allow this territorial response to happen.
    Posted by: Anonymous Location: Omaha on Apr 1, 2008 at 12:30 AM
    Last year i was bit by my neighbors pitbull, not because she was vicious or violent but because i was in the back yard eating a sandwich...she was just hungry, she had not been fed in days and finally broke off her chain. I did not blame the dog, even while my hand was bleeding. I simply gave her a bowl of dog food and called the humane society (for the 4th time that month). I love the breed, my 54 year old mother has a pitbull and he is her constant companion. If trained and cared for properly they are amazing animals. I belive the enforcement of the laws that are in place should be tighter, not just for pits but for all dog owners. Because had something been done about these dogs the first time the humane society was contacted there may have been much different results.
    Posted by: Anonymous Location: omaha on Mar 31, 2008 at 08:44 PM
    I think if you wanna make this a better city-Lets put a stop to the violence that seems to be getting worse-THATS the problem.It'not I'm afraid of getting attacked by a pit when I go for a walk,which is not a common thing (only when idiots are not being responsable) it's I am afraid of getting shot and/or murderd by some looser.
    Posted by: J (@ 757) @ 726 Location: NY on Mar 31, 2008 at 07:26 PM
    To John 1027 am: First I would like you to cite your source. Then I would like clarify once again, they are a terrier breed. Terriers were bred originally for hunting ground dwelling game. Later in the breeds evolution, mastiff lines were incorporated to make the breed larger (today it stands at 18 inches at the shoulder). The increased size prompted the use for bull baiting. In addition, baiters are trained, which means one simple thing, these dogs are also bred for trainablity. Just taking the time to train your dog can make all the difference. I respect all opinions on this forum and I expect the same in return. In the future, I would appreciate it if you would not assume I am a student of "revisionist history." I will be glad to show you my BS in Animal Science not to mention my personal experiences working with these animals. One final comment, dogs have been domesticated for human companionship for thousands of years, tigers, lions and bears have not.
    Posted by: Chelsey Location: Omaha on Mar 31, 2008 at 06:22 PM
    Any dog can be trained or raised to be a protection dog. If a protection dog is outside of its element and someone is scared, the dog can sense that and will attack that person weather the dog is a Pitbull, German Shepherd, or Doberman for example. They will all do the same thing. It's just that more people do get Pit Bull's in Omaha than a German Shepherd or Doberman because in my opinion, Pit bulls are cuter. I have many Pit bulls who were raised to be around people and I would love to show all of Omaha that it is how you raise the animal, not just a perticular animal. On the flip side, I have a protection dog who was professionally trained as such, that is a sweet baby to me but not someone it does not know. For people who do have such dogs, it is 100% the owners responsiblity to watch and manage that dog. It is not the dogs choice when people get a dog for fighting, it's doing what it is told to do, no matter what kind of dog it is. BAN THE DEED NOT THE BREED.
    Posted by: Anonymous Location: omaha on Mar 31, 2008 at 04:14 PM
    just wanted to say thanks to the idiots who let there dogs run around the streets loose.Your giving the higher-uppers something to do.I'm bored there is nothing going on in this town lets ban a breed of a dog-we will then worry about the stadium later. And also that lady in the video from council Bluffs.She talking about how it made a difference.Yes it is so much better there now I wanna go raise my family there.She has helped do so much-at least thats what I am sure she is telling herself.What a joke this whole story has become.
    Posted by: Liam Location: Omaha on Mar 31, 2008 at 12:22 PM
    I see a lot of postings about how "all" pit bulls are bad, or how "all" of them are bad; remember the words of wisdom: "Only a Sith deals in absolutes."
    Posted by: John Location: Omaha on Mar 31, 2008 at 10:27 AM
    J- I know revisionist history is a popular pastime this days but you seem to have confused some facts. Not only was the breed of pitbull created for dog fighting, but historically they have been used for the fighting of bears, tigers, lions, bulls, among others. Pitbull are no more suited for domestic purposes then any of the other animals I have just mentioned. I know there are popular magazine and book publishers that will print anything to sell another copy. I also know there are breeders that will say anything to perpetuate their business. But a person has to consider the motivation behind such misinformation. I have owned a dog which was half pitbull. I have also owned many other types of dogs. Based on this experience and witnessing the extremely aggressive behavior of pitbulls on may occassions. I have to question why anyone feels the need to own a dog which is capable of easily killing other dogs people, and under the right circumstances even tigers or bears?
    Posted by: Anonymous Location: omaha on Mar 31, 2008 at 10:08 AM
    hey 550 hp -You seem to know so much about what the breeds history and what they were bred for -well guess what do your studies a little bit harder also you got a few right but theres hundreds of breeds bred for all sorts of reasons.And pits are bred for all sorts of reasons as well,even to be a house hold pet such as me.Why did I get one because I came across one,did my studies and actually rescued one from a not so good beginning.Don't tell me why I and others got a dog because you don't know.How about I start saying things about you because I assume.Yes there are bad owners-as there are good owners-and there are great owners.A good or great owner won't allow there dog to run around the neighborhood.So it's been 2 attacks in 2 states in around 100 days that I heard on the news WOW! it's a major problem-I guess only in Omaha it would be.Please don't let a few dummys ruin it for everyone else.
    Posted by: C. Moore Location: Omaha, NE on Mar 31, 2008 at 08:43 AM
    I just want to say that if every city and county were into Breed Discrimination or excuse me "Dog Bans on Pit Bulls" then what would happen to the good pet owners that have pit bulls that weren't raised to attack human beings? I agree with the other caller that called in and stated that any human being or dog when put into a negative situation would react. DON'T BREED YOUR DOG TO BE AN ATTACKER IF YOU PLAN TO KEEP THEM AROUND and this warning goes out to not only pets but their 0wners too. Thank you
    Posted by: J @ 757 Location: NY on Mar 30, 2008 at 07:57 PM
    Pit bulls are were not originally bred for dog fighting, thats a fact. They are a terrier breed which also makes it a mid-sized breed not a large or giant breed. Breeding for dog fighting is a relatively recent event when you consider dogs were domesticated 12,000 years ago. I thought that people need to have their facts straight. And, just to clarify something, barking does not indicate viciousness. Also, the owners need to be held accountable for one simple reason. If you sit your dog down (of any breed) and tell it its against the law to bite people they DONT GET IT BECAUSE ITS A DOG. It is not their job to make smart choices its the owners job. People will hate me for saying this but it is similar to a race issue. If someone of another race muggs someone else does that mean that everyone of that race is bad? ABSOLUTELY NOT. You cannot blame an entire breed for the actions of a few, and it is a few when you look at actual numbers.
    Posted by: Chris Location: LV on Mar 30, 2008 at 06:41 PM
    I think I'm getting a handle on this debate. We agree that two pit bulls attacked and dragged an elderly man. The debate is whether the dogs knew what they did was wrong, or if their conscience was impaired by bad socializing. Pit bull owners believe that the dogs are not vicious, that the dogs are merely misunderstood in their attempt to play with Mr. Hewett, due to poor socializing. Those who fear pit bulls want the opportunity to walk safely down the street without a rhetoric wielding dog owner letting their dog "play" with the pedestrian to the tune of thousands of dollars of hospital bills.
    Posted by: AP Location: Omaha on Mar 30, 2008 at 04:34 PM
    We hear about pit bull bites because it is a media frenzie. A Golden Retriever bite is not news worthy nor sensational. The American Temperament Test Society has conducted tests since 1977 measuring shyness, stablitlity, aggressiveness and friendliness. The "Bully Breeds" have at least a two point above average pass grades from other breeds. Several breeds with low average passing grades include the Beagle, Collie and Sheltie.
    Posted by: John Location: Omaha on Mar 30, 2008 at 12:40 PM
    Defenders of the pitbull breed are correct in saying that other breeds such as the German Shepherd can be equally dangerous. The difference is that the German Shepherd breed was created for the practical purpose of herding. In more recent history other desirable qualities have been selectively bred into the German Shepherd making them suitable candidates for such usefull jobs as police work and seeing eyes dogs among others. This being said only those who are willing to train, socialize, and exercise their dog should own a German Shepherd. Which brings up another point. The ability to socialize is specifically bred into the German Shepherd. The breed of pitbull on the other and was created for the specific purpose of dog fighting. Socializing is generally not a priority to the breeders of pitbulls.
    Posted by: Tones on Mar 30, 2008 at 12:08 PM
    Jimmy -- if it had been a pit bull that attacked you, we would have heard about it because you would have needed multiple stitches and would be missing fingers.
    Posted by: Anonymous Location: omaha on Mar 30, 2008 at 11:31 AM
    To know one is to own one.I guarentee over 3/4 of the ones wanting the banned has probablly never been in contact with one.But they heard o tv or the radio or read about the FEW bad moments for the breed,so they go by that.Guess what I heard on the news this girl was killed by a drunk driver-There should be a ban on alcohol or better yet lets bann vehicles-I know it does crazy don't it-my point exactlly.
    Posted by: John Location: Omaha on Mar 30, 2008 at 08:46 AM
    It is a good idea to consider what type of lifestyle a person lives when choosing which type of breed to own. For example, someone who is not active might choose a toy breed. Someone who runs might choose a hound. A hunter would obviously most likely choose a retriever. We own a herding dog because we like to camp, and herding dogs are unlikely to run away if they get loose in the country. They are also easy to train. What I'm getting to is I have yet to read a valid reason for any of these pitbull owners to choose a pitbull. I've read a few blogs from persons claiming that the neighbor kids play with their pitbulls. Come on, no sane person would allow kids to play with a pitbull. A pitbull can so easily injure a child even by accident. Pitbulls are bred for their biting power, aggression, and desire to maintain an attack inspite of injury to themselves. So what does that tell you about pitbull owners?
    Posted by: Anonymous Location: omaha on Mar 30, 2008 at 07:50 AM
    Exactally how long is this story going to be talked about.It has been like 5 or 6 days days.It seems like you want to convince people they are bad.Please call the humane society and see how many others have been bit or attacked by other breeds since this story aired.What it is is the strength of the dog.It isnt because they are all crazy.If thats the case there would be a handfull every day hitting the news doesnt that make since also Steve Irwin would of been attacked by his before the sting ray death and the dog whisperer doesnt seem to have problems even when he brings the pit on live talk shows without a problem.When your newscasts air with the pits its convencing people thay are all bad and its probablly why all the negative remarks.I guarentee over half the people saying ban them have never even been in contact with a pit.Yes there will be a few that have had bad encounters.But it will be the same with every breed.All news cast there is 2 sides to every story.
    Posted by: AP Location: Omaha on Mar 30, 2008 at 07:48 AM
    The problem is not the breed of dog, the problem is irresponsible dog owners who fail to keep their pets secure and those that train the animals to be aggressive. Take away a breed of dog and another breed will take its place. BSL does not address the fact that a dog of ANY BREED can become dangerous when bred or TRAINED to be aggressive. Breed bans are also difficult to enforce and unfair to the responsible dog owner and non-threatening dogs. The problem is a people problem not a dog problem.
    Posted by: 550 hp Location: Here on Mar 30, 2008 at 04:50 AM
    Hey "Vickie 3/29 @ 4:14pm", if German Shepherds are so bad, then how come police departments ALL AROUND THE WORLD use them? Why don't they use Pit-bulls? And if pits are "trained right", why are they still so agressive toward other dogs to the point to where the pits WILL kill them? If Pit-bulls are "sooo lovey dovey" toward "YOU" and "YOUR KIDS", why do they want to KILL everything or everyone else? You Pit-bull feens say; "It is how the Pit-bull is trained".. That's the biggest crock I have ever heard. One guy said; "I have Pit-bulls because of the type of person that I am".. Well, sorry dude, but we're not all losers, white trash and gang bangers and if that is the type of person you choose to be, then that's your choice.. Your pit may be able to rip my throat out, but my dog (German Shepherd) will smell the drugs in your house from a mile away.. And my Jack Russel Terrier, well, the ONLY thing I have to worry about him is, digging under the fence to chase rabbits!!! Bring on the ban
    Posted by: jimmy Location: omaha on Mar 29, 2008 at 10:09 PM
    i think that it is sickening how people sit there and judge any breed u dont hear about any lab attacks ive personally been attacked by 3 labs my neibor has 1 i know eventually i will end up getting bit ive called several times the humane society still hant came out but if i said it was a pit they would be out in minutes, PITS ARE ALL I'VE HAD AND ALL I'LL EVER HAVE
    Posted by: Anonymous Location: omaha on Mar 29, 2008 at 08:58 PM
    How many attacks have been put on tv in the last 2 years that were pit bulls.When you really think about it-If EVERY pit is bad -outta all the 1000's owned.Don't you think there would be several every single day.It's funny out of 12 years of owning my 2 pits I yet have to have a problem yet.
    Posted by: I LOVE AMERICAN PIT BULLS Location: WESTPHALIA, IA on Mar 29, 2008 at 06:47 PM
    these dogs are far from stupid!! infact they are one of the smartest breeds out there, look it up. stop asuming its all the breeds fault. its the stupid owners that need to be band! we have had our pit bull for almost 3 years now, got her when she was just 4 weeks old. she is the best dog i have ever had, she loves everyone including children and other dogs. i will always own a pit bull. its all on how you the owner wants to raise them. im sick of people telling me pit bulls are bad or the reaction i get when i tell someone about my pit. lets finally start punishing the owners, i love my pit too much to let the breed die. baning breeds wont help will anyone realize that...ever!
    Posted by: M Location: Omaha on Mar 29, 2008 at 06:14 PM
    With my shepherds maintaining appropriate boundaries is a very important part of training. A dog, especially the larger dogs if allowed will extend territories over time. This is behavior best not ever allowed to begin. Some dogs are challenging to keep home, starting with a puppy tends to work out best. Irregardless immediate correction to the behavior is important. Owners who purposely allow their dogs to run are putting the rest of the neighborhood at risk as the dogs become more territorial, this must not be allowed, I do not believe this problem is breed specific, it is more of an owner specific problem. Socialization only goes so far, territory is important to a pack animal. I do have a problem with people who are mean to dogs, so therefore I personnally worry more about people than I do my dog. My dog listens to me, people trespass just like a stray dog and most always are arrogant as they pass by. Pit bulls are not my favorite breed, I believe the owner is responsible.
    Posted by: Vicki Location: Millard on Mar 29, 2008 at 05:56 PM
    In response to the ignorant one that posted people buy these stupid dogs because they know people are scared of them. Thats just the wrong people who have them and should not be allowed to have them those are the idiots we are talking about. I worry more about the dog next door attacking my pittbull who stands there and wags her tail while the dog next door barks their head off at my dog. Now which dog sounds aggressive. We need to stop breeding altogether. I think people breed and don't care who buys them it's just a quick buck.
    Posted by: Jim Location: omaha on Mar 29, 2008 at 05:25 PM
    What has happened to the leash law in this city? I see dogs everywhere not on leashes. Come on City, Crack down on this problem!!
    Posted by: roger Location: omaha on Mar 29, 2008 at 05:01 PM
    We have the right to bare arms: We should have the right to own a certian breed of a dog: Do guns kill or do stupid people/idiots who have them kill. My point exactlly.
    Posted by: Anonymous Location: omaha on Mar 29, 2008 at 04:57 PM
    According to a highly regarded dog breed dictionary-it was little discription on every breed.According to that Pits dont have lock jaws-it says that the jaws are just that strong.I actually called 2 vets offices and they said the same thing.They said allot of the breeders say that.I thought I would just share that with everyone.
    Posted by: Anonymous Location: omaha on Mar 29, 2008 at 04:52 PM
    I was attacked violently by a black lab and have the scars to prove it -It was my face and thankfully missed my left eye by a lil over an inch-but my cheek was badly damaged and had to go to the hospital.I did not provoke it-i went to pet it.That did not hit the news,i was like it's just a lab-dogs bite-If it was a pit-someone would of made sure the news was there.All dogs bite and I did not blame the dog he didnt trust me and I reached over him.Just my thoughts on this waste of time matter-it is so Omaha.
    Posted by: Anonymous Location: omaha on Mar 29, 2008 at 04:47 PM
    Wow you will go to Iraq if you can shoot the pits.You are not man enough to go there to fight for your rights such as freedom of speech-like the garbage you just said.I know 5 marines who are proud owners of pits.I have a feeling they might stop you.Because they are real men.It appears you have some issues you need to work out with yourself-you seem to be the one with the violence.Is that how you feel tuff-killing dogs.I wish all the pit haters could go along with the animal cops-rescuers and see what the breed goes through it will a reality check.I have a feeling the majority has not.I just think that there is allot of other things wrong not only in this city but state and country that need to be dealt with.hunderds and thousands are killed and injured every week in this country by several of other things than dogs.You put a stop to the gangs,drugs,drinking,ect.-i think most of the problems will stop such as dog fighting.I just can't believe it's even an issue.
    Posted by: Cathy Location: Omaha on Mar 29, 2008 at 04:37 PM
    I get the feeling that those who don't train their pitbulls want them extremely agressive to protect their property. What do they have that is so valuable that they will endanger people so visciously.
    Posted by: Anonymous Location: omaha on Mar 29, 2008 at 04:32 PM
    I think it's funny how people are labeling all pit owners as losers and criminals-Yes there are allot of them I 100% agree that there are many.But there are also allot of great ones and I am one.I am making roughly 80k a year which I feel I do pretty well.I was one who actually did not care for pits 12 years ago until my brother brought one home that was tied to the side of street as a puppy.I fell in love with the breed ever since.A few years later when I finacially stable I rescued 2 from some sick wimps who can only feel tough by being mean to dogs.These dogs expierenced a rough start and are loving life as all living breathing things should.So what I am saying is there are allot of people out there are responsible owners who like the breed for several reasons that are positive.But there are many who are sick heartless scum who get them for wronge reasons like- michael con-vick.Allot of the people should look in to whats going on where most eyes can't see.IT'S A SAD SIGHT.
    Posted by: Vickie Location: Omaha on Mar 29, 2008 at 04:14 PM
    More restrictions need to be placed on owners. It's not the animals fault. We are placing the blame on an animal doing what it was raised and trained to do. Penalize the owner severely. Forced insurance, increased fencing. Registration as a dangerous weapon. Jail time if need be but don't ban the breed. It will just be someother breed next year. Look at German Shepards or Dobermans. They have been guard dogs for years. Are we going to ban them too? Then we will all be stuck with cats... I love cats but they make lousy alert animals.
    Posted by: Keith Location: Papillion on Mar 29, 2008 at 03:52 PM
    I see four score and seven posts telling me that pit bulls are not vicious. "All pit bulls are not bad," says Pam Weise of the Humane Society. Literally, that means all pit bulls are good. Really? Yet, we have here an example of two (one mixed) pit bulls who did in fact attack, maul, and drag an elderly gentleman on a public sidewalk. Now, dog owners and humane society, you can use all the rhetoric you want to try convincing me that THE DOGS WERE MERELY CONFUSED BY THEIR BREEDING OR UPBRINGING, and they didn't intend to attack Mr. Hewett, but that won't pay his hospital bills. And if I'm someday walking when greeted by bare teeth canines, I'm not interested in pausing with them for A PSYCHOANALYSIS SESSION TO DETERMINE FROM WHERE THEIR FEARS AND ANGSTS DERIVE. It doesn't concern me whether it was bad breeding or an abusive owner, because my immediate concern is avoiding personal injury, regardless of the dogs' survival.
    Posted by: Vicki Location: Omaha on Mar 29, 2008 at 09:44 AM
    I currently own a pittbull, my dog is far from visious. I think people get these dogs for the wrong reason. We have alot of ignorant people out there. Rottwilers are just as visous. I have seen some pittbulls that are beautiful and not agressive. Any dog can be trained to be mean. I am totally against the ban. The people who are making these dogs mean need to be punished not the dogs.I will not get rid of my dog and I'm sure there are others that feel the same way as I do. I am at a loss for how to express my anger in all this. My dog is a family dog. She plays with all the kids and their friends. My dog is not vicious if anything she would lick you to death. She is an over weight lap dog whom we love very much and feel like we saved her from someone that would abuse her this is the best dog I have owned. I could go on all day on this subject but I hope you got my message. I will be following this matter to see whwre it goes. Thanks for letting me respond.
    Posted by: GW Location: Omaha on Mar 29, 2008 at 09:20 AM
    I agree with the majority here that it is not the dog but rather the owner's negligence. If you want tougher laws then add them to the leash laws alread in place such as: 1. Violation of leash law without incident; a second offense of this nature should result in a huge fine and mandatory classes or community services 2. Violation of leash law with incident of assault (fear was provoked; victim felt fear etc.) more severe punishment for owner; misdemeanor offense; 3. Violation of leash law with incident of assault and battery (victim was attacked and survived) more severe punishment for owner; felony offense; 4. Violation of leash law which resulted in death (victim was attacked; injuries resulted in a fatality) most severe punishment for owner; 1st degree felony offense. Some changes to the law as such should appropriately punish the true criminal the owner . . . not the animal. Just a thought...
    Posted by: John Location: Omaha on Mar 29, 2008 at 09:16 AM
    It's amazing how many responsible pitbull owners come out of the woodwork whenever a story like this arises. It's funny how I've never seen any of them at the Omaha dog park. Which I don't go to since a pitbull attacked my dog there. It's funny how never seen any of them at Memorial park. Which I don't go to since a pitbull attacked my dog there. I never see any responsible pitbull owners walking my neighborhood. Which we don't do since a pitbull bit my wife. The 2 pitbulls and their owners I've met at obedience class' got kicked out because the pitbulls kept attacking the other dogs. Now I drive to Council Bluffs to walk my dog. Just another reason to spend my money in C.B. Nice job Omaha.
    Posted by: Mark Ruch Location: Omaha on Mar 29, 2008 at 09:11 AM
    BSL does not make any sense. I have owned two Pit Bulls and both have been kind, gentle members of my family - which include two and three year old boys. My neighbors will also attest to their disposition and kindness towards COMPLETE strangers. Owners of this breed must be responsible for the type of dog they own. Own a Pit Bull because that type of personality fits with you and your family. Do not own a Pit Bull because it looks cool or has a certain status. Finally, spay and neuter your dog(s). And if you have no clue how to handle your Pit Bull or ANY other breed, watch Cesar Millan, the Dog Whisperer.
    Posted by: SHannon Stolp Location: Omaha on Mar 29, 2008 at 09:06 AM
    First off people shouldnt be letting any Breed of dog run the neighborhood.I SO firmly do not believe that banining this breed will solve any problems.If thats the case then shall we exterminate violent criminals,child molesters for the haniius crimes that they do? Treat any breed the way a pitbull is treated and see what happens...when you starve and beat and show no love,loyality and respect or safety what do you think would happen? I would own no other breed they are excellant with children and will stop at nothing to be loved. Millions of children at killed at the hands of parents and care givers each year and yet they are not being thought of exterminated so why should they?
    Posted by: laroyce on Mar 29, 2008 at 08:39 AM
    To Jake--you said that the dog was palying nicely when you made your snide comment and then children come running across the street toward the dog. Any chance the dog was startled and reacted to protect "his"family. Anyone who runs at oraround ANY breed of dog can trigger that kind of response. I bet the children were probably screaming too which would also make the dog think his family was being attacked. Look carefully at what happened because of some stupid kids.
    Posted by: Anonymous on Mar 29, 2008 at 03:28 AM
    I believe there is some truth that it's how a dog is trained. I can also say that I have never seen a successfully trained and socialized pitbull. I've seen many pitbulls which were taught to be mean and aggressive. I do believe that it is true that pitbulls are more dog than person aggressive. But I don't want a pitbull to attack my dog just because I'm taking a walk. I know pitbull owners seem to find it very amusing. I love my dog too. Apparently more than any pitbull owner I've met because my dog is trained and socialized. Which brings up another point adult pitbulls will attack puppies, male pitbulls will attack female dogs. That's not normal dog behavior. I love dogs too. I just can't see why anyone feels the need to own a dog that is bred to kill other dogs. I can honestly say though that I have seen pitbulls attack and bite people more then all other dog breeds combined.
    Posted by: To ALL Pit-bull owners Location: Get a life on Mar 29, 2008 at 03:17 AM
    Why do people buy or get Pit-bulls? I will tell you why, because the people with these worthless dogs KNOW that EVERYBODY else is scared of Pit-bulls. So that tells you EXACTLY what type of people own these dogs. Some of you say "well I live in West Omaha and am a "professional".. There ARE worthless losers in West O like anywhere else in the city. The ONLY reason people own these "dogs" is for the status symbol.. These people are JUST like their Pit-bulls, WORTHLESS.........
    Posted by: To Cindy @ 11:18pm Location: Omaha on Mar 29, 2008 at 02:29 AM
    Quit with the God stuff Cindy.. OK, "God" created Osama Bin Laden and the Iraqis we are fighting, so you must be OK with them killing our troops or bombing our country. Who really cares if God created pit-bulls? I hope one day that pits become extinct. Alot of you say; pit-bulls get a bad rap, well lets see, pit-bulls and dogs in their bloodline lock their jaws on you when they bite you. Dobermans, rottweilers, and ALL other dogs can't do that. Why are Pits generally the only dogs involved in dog fighting? Here's an idea, lets round them ALL up and ship them to Iraq for target practice. I'd join the military for that...
    Posted by: 550 hp Location: Here on Mar 29, 2008 at 02:11 AM
    The "US" Govt NEEDS to ban pit-bulls altogether. "Not all pit-bulls are bad" Give me a break.. A lot of dogs are treated bad(which I'm against) but can't lock their jaws on you like pit-bulls can. I can't stand these stupid dogs. 90 percent of the dogs in North O are pit-bulls, the other 10 percent are rottweilers. I say ban them in Omaha and send the police to North O to look for pits after the ban, and I would bet money that the houses the police find the pits at will also have illegal guns in them as well. Kill 2 birds with 1 stone. Ban these stupid dogs....
    Posted by: maggie on Mar 28, 2008 at 10:18 PM
    why punish a certain breed of dog its not their fault they were born pitbull.I think its all on the owner, no one and no animal is born to be a killer its the way are trained and the enviroment they grow up in.I think harsher laws on animal owners should take place.Pitbulls grow to love and care for for their familys the same way that poodle do the only difference is the owner. Lets not punish the familys who love their pitbulls,instead lets try and find the familys that are making pitbulls look like horrible viciouse animals.
    Posted by: Daisy Location: Lincoln on Mar 28, 2008 at 09:48 PM
    Punish the owners not the breed. My pit bull is well trained and one of the nicest dogs I've ever had. Why do dogs of any breed attack? Fear of humans which usually means they have been abused. Let's look at cracking down on irresponsible owners and people involved in dog fighting which continues to give these dogs a bad name. This whole issue stems from larger societal problems that should be addressed rather then focusing on finger pointing and banning a breed of animal for the sake of finding an easier "solution"
    Posted by: Bluebull Location: Lincoln on Mar 28, 2008 at 09:35 PM
    the problem is not the dogs, i have owned/ bred pit bulls for 10 years have gone to breed shows all over the country and have see and touched literally thousands of pit bulls... and never once have i been so much as growled at. the problem is not the dogs its the MORONS that own them. if you take any dog... ANY dog and chain in the back yard never socialize it and teach it how to act its going to be a danger to anyone that it encounters. period. FACT: the american pitbull terrier is the only breed of dog ever to be bred for the trait of bite inhibition. Breeders have to buy dogs of other breeds to protec the pit bulls because people walk up off the street and walk away with them. when properly raised and bred they love people. More important than all of that, did you know that 90% of people dont know what a real pit bull looks like. there are dozens of "find the pibull" games on the net and most people fail them miserably. how can you ban what you cant identify?
    Posted by: LauraG Location: North Carolina on Mar 28, 2008 at 09:34 PM
    Over the past 43 years (1965 to 2007) there have been five (5) fatal dog attacks in Nebraska, or an average of one (1) fatality every 8 to 9 years.* Compared to other risk modalities, severe and fatal dog attacks are vanishingly rare. More people die in NE from drowning, motorcycle and ATV accidents. I would challenge Brannigan on her claim that there are "zero" incidents. Most cities that ban pit bulls see an increase in bite incidents (across all breeds)because ACO's are wasting time chasing after harmless dogs. Why not work on enforcing EXISTING ordinances first? Does anyone know what the compliance rate is for, say, leash laws, registration and rabies vaccinations? * www.nationalcanineresearchcouncil.com
    Posted by: matt Location: bellevue on Mar 28, 2008 at 09:28 PM
    to chuck i was not saying this gentleman provocted the dogs that atact him. but i will stick to my previous statment. dogs fear us just as much as we do them. the only diference is we can't smell their fear. as well as any dog can bite you or me. the last dog i own (prior to my current) was a pitt and yes it bite me but i was also responsible enough to put her to sleep berfore it happened to my kids or anyone else's. wether i had something to do with it or not. i love any dog and respect them but there is a line of trust that has to be built between both parties. as for the no reason. i have never hurt anyone for no reason. nor have my dogs
    Posted by: Karma Location: South Omaha on Mar 28, 2008 at 09:20 PM
    Large dogs? my american pitbull only weighs 45 pounds. Why do you think it is fair to punish all people and their pitbulls for the actions of one bad dog? I never leave my dog alone for a second even in our fenced yard and he is always on leash whenever we leave the yard. Why not instead of talking of a ban, Ban the people that are irresponsible owners from ever having a dog again.Any dog can bite...These people that let their dogs run wild or bark all night should not be able to have a dog of any breed, that's what I propose. If Council Bluffs doesn't keep their noses out of Omaha's business. I think all Omaha pitbull owners should boycott SPENDING anymore money in Council Bluffs.You have your laws, and we have ours lets let it lay at that.
    Posted by: Anonymous Location: omaha on Mar 28, 2008 at 08:39 PM
    So ony pit bulls attack? What about the first ever face transplant done? That woman was attacked by her lab while she slept!! What about the pomeranian that killed a baby? Reading the comments against pit bulls here just proves the point for pro-pit bull owners. Look at the stories: my neighbors dog got out, my neighbor sicked his dog on me and my famiy.. etc. Sounds like the owners of these dogs that have the probems! My dogs are never un-supervised and I do not let them run free, I don't care what the breed of the dog is. If you came to visit my dogs you would find goofy, playful, loyal snuggle-bugs. They are very gentle with children and all they want to do when company comes is shower them with kisses. I think a stricter leash law needs to be put in place FOR ALL BREEDS! I dot not know even one person that has been bitten by a pit bull, yet I have 6 friends and/or family members scarred for life from being attacked by the famiy labrador. How about we ban them and their owners?
    Posted by: G Location: La Vista on Mar 28, 2008 at 08:00 PM
    What gives you a vicious pit bull (or any animal) is the idiots that breed these dogs for their vicious traits, and to neglect and abuse them. They do this to raise them for fighting. Its these people that should be banned from the city. They've taken a beautiful breed of dog, and turned them into agressive killers. There should be a much stiffer penalty on these people that do that to these dogs. Make the first offence of dog fighting, breeding and harboring a dog that has been fought, to be banned from the city. That will get rid of some trash from our neighborhoods.
    Posted by: Faith Location: Seattle, WA on Mar 28, 2008 at 06:45 PM
    Again, an entire breed are punished for the irresponsible actions of the few. Breed bans will not bring about public safety from all the dogs that bite, so why focus on pitbulls. What needs to be enforced are harsher penalties for owners of dogs found wandering the streets; mandatory microchipping so dogs can be traced back to their owners; tougher leash laws; bans on chaining dogs for extended periods as it is shown to increase aggression; mandatory spay/neuter for all dogs unless those owned by licensed breeders or those who participate in dog shows. This is what will solve the issue of dog attacks, not discriminatory breed bans.
    Posted by: Denise Location: Omaha on Mar 28, 2008 at 04:21 PM
    In response to should pit bulls be outlawed? I say no, any breed of dog is capable of attacking given the right circumstance or training. Dogs attacking people are usually in response to provoking, or mistreatment by the owners of the dog. All dog owners should have to go through classes on how to raise & train their animals to determine if they are fit to be responsible for that dog. I feel it should be mandatory for all owners of aggressively nature dogs but it wouldn't hurt for all pet owners to have some training. I would like to know why someone didn't have enough care for their dogs to keep them fenced in or on a tie down to avoid this tragedy. I love my dogs & have invested time & money in them. They are very much apart of my family and I would do whatever necessary to protect them from outsiders and themselves. There is a difference between someone who loves their dog and someone who just wants to own one.
    Posted by: Tracy Location: maha on Mar 28, 2008 at 04:05 PM
    I own a 2year old pittbull, she is one of the most loving dogs i have ever owned. My family has always owned large breed dogs and to be truthful the one that I feared the most was our "Rott" He could have turned on anyone and my father put him down at the first sign of aggression. My policy with my pitt is the same, the first sign of aggression she will be put down. I also agree with the large ins policy. We lived in des moines for a while and had a $500,000 on her, when we moved back to omaha we kept the insurance on her. I am the owner and I am resposible for her actions. For the people that can not own up to their resposiblitlies for owning these breeds should face legal actions. I do not agree with an all out ban, but I do agree with certain regulations on the breed. My husband always says that if we breed her and find out that anyone is fighting her pups that he would go and kill the dog himself. Maybe all breeders should feel that way.
    Posted by: Pecan Tan Location: Omaha on Mar 28, 2008 at 04:01 PM
    Pit Bulls are not vicious dogs, its what you make of them. I would not have any other pet. Pits are loyal, friendly, and love attention. I read the Dalmation breed is the # 1 killer of dogs. Dont ban an entire breed because of a few incidents and they happen to be pits. It's based on how the particular dog is raised not the breed.My pits are VERY well trained and I love them.
    Posted by: Joleen Location: Bellevue on Mar 28, 2008 at 04:01 PM
    I'm outraged! It is not the dogs fault that they bite. Dogs that bite are raised to be aggresive. If your going to ban pit bulls then you should ban all big to medium dogs. All dogs bite even small ones but it only makes news when its a pit bull. I have a pit bull and she is a wonderful dog to me and my children. And our neighbor has a rot who is also a gentle giant. Our dogs play together with our children all the time. The owners are responsible and i agree that training is the issue along with public awareness that these dogs can be great pets. Again the pets are not the problems as with everything its humans that are the problems!!!!!
    Posted by: Anonymous on Mar 28, 2008 at 03:35 PM
    I am not saying that my dog is good with strangers. I am saying I am a responsible and take necessary and extra steps in life before my dogs go potty so I can assure that my dog will not be in danger to anyone.
    Posted by: Dog Owner Location: Omaha on Mar 28, 2008 at 03:22 PM
    The problem with pit bulls and other larger dogs is the damage they can do. If there is a stupid owner with a biting Pomeranian, the chance of that dog killing a person or other animal is small. However, if you take a large, strong breed such as a Pit Bull, the risk of irreversible damage to the victim is great. While I can agree it is the fault of an irresponsible owner or breeder, that doesn't mean we should wait for a child to get mauled to death before we intervene and understand that not all dog owners and breeders are responsible!
    Posted by: Jake Location: Regency on Mar 28, 2008 at 03:18 PM
    I was visiting family last weekend, and I noticed their neighbor was playing with his pitbull in the front yard. I asked him how old the dog was, and he replied that the dog was 6 months old. I jokingly asked him "is that the age that they start eating children?" Before he could begin to defend the dog's breed and try to persuade me that he has the sweetest dog in the world, three children came running out of the house across the street. The dog became hysterical and required all of his owner's strength to be restrained. So yes, this is a worthless breed that needs to be banned.
    Posted by: Kathy Location: Omaha on Mar 28, 2008 at 03:17 PM
    I'm afraid that certain people in society views a pit bull as a "status symbol" in the community they live in, rather than a family pet. It gives them an ego lift...how sad.
    Posted by: Marshall Location: Omaha on Mar 28, 2008 at 03:15 PM
    Gary, you've got things backwards. Pit bulls continue to attack people on a regular basis (it happens all the time), and they continue to make the news. Why, because people are disfigured and killed. You tell us we "should shut up when a person is bitten." Why? So you don't have to bother with police or reporters when your dog attacks someone?
    Posted by: doris on Mar 28, 2008 at 02:26 PM
    excuse me--but why shouldn't a 60yr adopt a large breed dog I have a 60 friend who just adopted two st bernards. What gives you the right to tell us what kind of dog to get--I personally can't stand the "Taco Bell" type dog and many of the other small breeds but I don't tell people because of the age what type of dog to get. And by the way--poodles do bite
    Posted by: Tones Location: omaha on Mar 28, 2008 at 02:25 PM
    Pitbulls are ticking time bombs. The people who are defending the breed are actually MAKING the case for restrictions on the breeds. Their arguments that it's the "owner's fault" not the animals is good enough reason to for society to restrict who may own these dangerous vicious animals. When other dog's bite -it is just that... a bite. When a pitbull attacks -it's a PITBULL ATTACK FRENZY! Let's do a little deduction: If when pitbulls attack it is the owner's fault because they were irresponsible, then it is safe to say the irresponsible people like pitbulls. The owners of these dogs always say things like, "I never saw it coming" after such attacks. They had the same denial that pre-attack pitbull owners currently have. They are blind to the possibility that their beloved "Spike" could snap and maul a child or an innocent pedestrian...... Rude awakening... rude awakening.
    Posted by: nick Location: omaha on Mar 28, 2008 at 02:03 PM
    your right Dave, they have been damaged over time and who is to blame-so lets get rid of them after people screwed allot of them up-YES thats the answer.My point exactly.It is a sad sitsuation and I hope that we don end up like C-Bluffs.-it is not a fair fight.Human screw allot of them up and now it is time to throw them away.Do not let a few bad apples riun the damn bunch-Use your head,get all the facts before making a decision-really look into whats all going on that everyone does not see-the torture,the neglect,fighting,inbreeding,beating,killing.They kill and torture if they are not mean enough.Come on guys lets be reasonable they are not all bad and if they are it's our fault-Have a heart,look it up on the internet and see what they expierence.Respect my opinion as I do yours.
    Posted by: KC Location: omaha on Mar 28, 2008 at 01:53 PM
    AMERICA land of the free,home of the we tell what kind of dog you can own.Our rights are going down the tubes.As an American I can go buy a gun and a 24 pack of beer.But there is debate to what dog I can own.Is it not death everyday on the news over gangs,drugs,weapons,drinking,ect.,the main problem.I can not believe that this an issue.Thousands of pits in Omaha and a very small amount attack a couple of people and its a problem.No theres a much bigger problem.How long is this going to be on the news.Lets go back to the 3 month long talk about the stadium while eveyones is getting wasted and shooting people continues to spread cause thats not the problem here,it's the dogs.But I do believe you should be at least 18 years old to own one even 21 years of age.Because there are allot of idiots who get them for the wrong reason-thats a fact.But everybody sound off on how they should be banned even though many only have seen them on TV.I bet Fahey is loving that he is no longer the hot topic.
    Posted by: Liam Location: Omaha on Mar 28, 2008 at 01:39 PM
    Gary, what does age have to do with it? Adopting a dog - any breed, any age - is an act of kindness and humanity. Big dogs, by and large, are predisposed to have better obedience and loyalty than many other breeds. Labs, Shepherds, Rotts, Wolfhounds - they are great companions, protect you and your house, and are actually a lot more gentle and protective of the elderly and small children than small dogs, who often threaten and snap at people. Besides, 60 isn't as old as it used to be. One of my neighbors is about the same age as John McCain, and is a 'Nam vet - I wouldn't pick a fight with him on my best day. I agree the adoption laws should be tightened, but based more on the disposition and activity level of the people involved than their age. And certain breeds should require more stringent adoption policies. For instance, don't adopt a Sheltie if you want a quiet house. Don't get a Boxer if you don't want to play ball 9 hours a day. And just don't get a Chihuahua - period.
    Posted by: ed Location: omaha on Mar 28, 2008 at 01:38 PM
    It's funny the ones that own the dogs or have owned the dogs support them and the ones that have not owned one or only goes off what they hear don't like them.And the people that are telling them the negatives have not owned them either.How can people who don't understand the breed tell people what they are to go by-this does not make sense to me.Dont preach if you don't know what you are talking about.Also the people who say ban them-have you seen what mankind have done and are doing to the breed.The head people if they are to make a decision,need to go along with the animal cops and the ones that rescue and bust these neglecters and fighters and just see what these dogs go through-it is not fair-it is disgusting and sad.We as people have screwed them up and now its like just get rid of them(easy way out)(mankind pushing there weight around).I think people who have came into contact with the breed should be the only ones talking about it.Why coment on something with no knowledge of it
    Posted by: Deb on Mar 28, 2008 at 01:37 PM
    Those who think the HS is only saying that these animal's are nice because it's the "PC" way, you need to re-think that. If they were really a problem they would be the first to step in line with the ban in order to make their jobs easier. People need to do more research when buying a pet (of any kind). Pit Bull bites are made more public because that's what sells, no one wants to hear about a Golden Retriever or a Lab biting. But to tell you the truth there are more non-reported Golden Retriever bites then there are reported Pit Bull bites coast to coast. Pit Bull's should not be banned, bad owners should be.
    Posted by: roger Location: omaha on Mar 28, 2008 at 01:20 PM
    To Soopy Why is it exactly it's always a pit on the news-maybe because it seems to be the only dog attacks talked about on the news.Go check out the numbers -wise one.Pits are not at the top of the list for attacks.They are talked about because they are a stronger dog and can inflict damage.So they are being singled out for being the stronger dog-numbers don't lie.So before trying to sound like a smart one,look in to it.I can say I can speak on this being that I am a owner of the breed 15 years.And have been in contact with no less than 50 others (friends,family,and was in the grooming business for a while).This all my opinion-but I do have a a little knowledge with the breed.
    Posted by: cindy Location: omaha on Mar 28, 2008 at 01:02 PM
    To Liz I respect your opinion but it's my believe that if you are a breathing being you have a soul.And just where did the dogs come from exactly.You say they are created by man.How did man first make a dog.Please tell me.You seem to know-If you talking that they are bred by man-How did it all begin.Just where did the first of all the dogs come from.ALL I know is that they date back before 1900.And now it's a problem and we are to blame in my opinion,Thanks to what they have gone through.Liz please tell me.IF it's through breeding how is it different through our family trees.JUST MY OPINION PLEASE RESPECT MINE AS I RESPECT ALL OF YOURS.All I know is 20 years of owning never a problem.
    Posted by: Jarbeau Location: Bellevue on Mar 28, 2008 at 12:52 PM
    Steve makes a good case although I'm not sure which side he's on. Is he saying his neighbor is a poor dog owner because his wonderfully behaved pit bull attacked ANOTHER neighbor? And Gary's agist comment about 60 year-olds not owning large breed dogs. People should read their posts before they send them. Oops, too late. I just hit the submit button.
    Posted by: CeCe on Mar 28, 2008 at 12:04 PM
    What does the owner of these dogs have to say? I'd like to hear the lame brain reason why these aggressive animals were left to run around. I am a dog owner of two and as pet owner, these dogs are a part of the family. I can't imagine having an animal that I would not trust to be around other people or other dogs....but then again I don't chain them to a tree and poke sticks at them for entertainment. I"m certainly not saying this owner did that or mistreated them in anyway...I don't know that. I am saying that as owners, we must take proactive responsibility for the animals behavior. Meaning that it is up to us to train and handle any behavioral issues. Tough to blame the breed when the owners don't live up to their responsibility.
    Posted by: ryan Location: omaha on Mar 28, 2008 at 12:03 PM
    What someone like Lynne does not understand is when they decided to ban the Pits what exactly did Lynne know about the breed.30 attacks in 365 days is that it.Add up the amount of the other dog attacks through out the year.Are pits being banned for being strong.Some say it's in there bloodline.Exactly whos to blame for that.I believe it falls on our hands don't you.They don't have a voice.The radio no-it-alls just rip the breed apart and when people call in they are mocked and made fun of when trying to stick up for the breed.The radio host need to actually see whats really going on.For how crazy it may sound it's like racism.Pits are'nt the only thing injuring/killing people.I can write a list of 50 things,people would be one.Pits are living breathing souls that deserve a right to live.Dogs are a mans best friend and they are being singled out.I got several friends in Iraq who are owners of pits-after fighting for the US-your favorite breed is know banned-but thanks for your services!!
    Posted by: D Location: Bellevue on Mar 28, 2008 at 11:42 AM
    Erek, you're right, any dog will bite...some only if provoked, others for no reason other than they felt like it. Personally, I'm all for banning those horrid little "purse" pooches. I've seen more of those things be nasty than any other type of dog. But, while one of my grandmothers owned a pit, which was very sweet, I can't say I'm a fan of those either. Once they do decide to bite, they, unlike the little ones whose mouth I can pry open, tend to not let go. But you're right, it is how they're raised. We're in the process of teaching an adopted mutt-dog that she doesn't need to chew on us. If she'd been taught that as a puppy by her obviously neglectful owners, who fortunately gave her back to the HS, she'd be a great dog right now. As is, we have a 15 month old dog who acts like she's a 4 month old puppy some days. Training can make all the difference.
    Posted by: Gary Location: Omaha on Mar 28, 2008 at 11:27 AM
    Dogs attack. The reason you don't hear about a poodle attacking someone is because it isn't news. Get a grip. It happens all the time. Tougher adoption laws need to be put in place. There is no reason that a 60 year old person should adopt a large breed dog, but it happens. Adoption and breeding laws need to be refined and enforced more and if you aren't willing to pay taxes for it, then you should shut up when a person is bitten.
    Posted by: Pat Location: Shenandoah on Mar 28, 2008 at 11:25 AM
    It is the owner's responsibility to see that the dogs are safely in the area of control of the owner. If the Omaha city council wants to pass an ordinance, make it so that all dogs, when outside the area of control(yard) of the owner, have to be on a leash....then make the first offense a 250 dollar fine, and go up from there. All breeds of dog can be vicious, but chows, rottweilers, pit bulls, and other breeds historically known for their viciousness(athleticness). The authorities should make the owner pay the expenses of this case(all medical bills), and charge the owner with reckless endangerment. To all dog owners: please stop saying your dog is a good dog. Your dog is good to you and your family. Strangers are threatning to a dog. Please understand this.
    Posted by: Steve Location: Ponca on Mar 28, 2008 at 11:12 AM
    To Liz...these animals are NOT viscious by nature. It is the responsibility of the OWNER to make sure that attacks like this don't happen. My neighbor had a very well-mannered pit bull & very well behaved. After it attacked another neighbor, he put the dog down because he didn't want this to EVER happen again. Quit blaming the animal & LOOK AT THE OWNER!
    Posted by: Jill Location: omaha on Mar 28, 2008 at 11:02 AM
    It is sad that as a society we are deciding to try to eliminate a breed of dog that has a very good and long history. For those of you who are fearful of them or do not quite understand them, educate yourself. Most of the people in this discussion have experience and common sense which is needed for this type of breed. Banning them is not the answer. Bad breeding, bad upbringing and bad owners are to blame. For those you who think only white, black, or brown trash are the only ones who own a pit bull, you are sadly mistaken. A lot of very responsible, common sense filled people have them. They CHOOSE to take care of their dogs properly. And there are alot. Do some research people, these dogs go way back and have been in some very prominent homes, even the white house. It is said that ignorance breeds fear, and in this case fear is running wild.
    Posted by: GM Location: Omaha on Mar 28, 2008 at 11:01 AM
    Steve..It's true that there are several dog bites that happen and never reported, why are the pitbull attacks always reported?? Because that is exactly what they are..Attacks...The Pitbull does so much more damage than any other breed of dog, that is why it makes the news.
    Posted by: Anonymous on Mar 28, 2008 at 10:53 AM
    I agree with Frank!!
    Posted by: Anonymous on Mar 28, 2008 at 10:48 AM
    I would love for you to come visit my dog or videotape my dog and see that they are not mean. I agree with all of the world that people are scared and tahts all we hear about. But I guarantee that it is the owner. My male could care less if someone came in the house he will just go to his bed and lay there and not care one bit. But these owners who let their dogs roam free are wrong and not very careful owners. I won't take my dog to the dog park those are just exceptions you have to dela with when having this kind of dog that is why mine ar house dogs.
    Posted by: Anonymous Location: OMAHA on Mar 28, 2008 at 10:46 AM
    I am extremely upset with these dogs getting the rep they do because of STUPID owners. Not saying anything against this owner because I don't know her. But there are stupid people out there who think that fighting and abusing dogs is ok and fun. Little do they know. These dogs can be the greatest sweetest dogs in the world if owners took care of them and trained them. I am 150 % positive my dogs wouldn't attack. I take EXTRA precaution. I go outside and look around before my dogs go potty and they are always on a leash and my doors are ALWAYS closed. I have trained them to be LAZY HOUSEDOGS. I have gone to extremes to make my dogs happy and content and good dogs. I think that is the NHS is going to adopt them out that is a GREAT idea. BUT they need to do extensive checks on the owner before they leave the NHS. Any dog can attack Boxers, greyhounds they are all stong but if the owner trains it right they have a better chance of not. I am scared to let my 20 pund dog run loose
    Posted by: Erek Location: West Omaha on Mar 28, 2008 at 10:45 AM
    I am a 25 year old professional who is a proud owner of an American Pit Bull Terrier and a resident of a well established West Omaha community. Ever since i took the responsibility of owning a Pit Bull, I knew how important it was to make sure she becomes a good example for A.P.B.T's around the city. I dont have a fence in my front yard and my dog can go outside unsupervised and i dont have to worry about her running off or chasing down the kids in the neighborhood. It sickens me to hear that irresponsible people choose to get a Pit Bull and dont take pride in raising them right. All types of dog breeds attack people but the only ones that get reported are Pit Bull attacks. A lot of the smaller breeds like Chihuahuas and 'Min-Pins'are mean from birth and bite people all the time. No one wants to ban little dogs. Yes A.P.B.T's can do more damage, my point is that an irresponsible person can own any breed of dog and have a tragic event like this happen.
    Posted by: Dave Location: Omaha on Mar 28, 2008 at 10:27 AM
    Pit bulls are a damaged breed through time. They are now untrustworthy and mostly bred for violent tendencies. Put them all down and make them illegal-the owners AND the dogs!!!
    Posted by: Steve Location: Omaha on Mar 28, 2008 at 10:08 AM
    So many people think that pit bulls are the ONLY breed that EVER attacks anyone. GET REAL!! All kinds of dogs attack and bite people all the time, you just never hear about it. The ONLY ones you hear about are pit bulls and that's because of all this right here. One story about a pit bull and the news station gets ALLLLLL kinds of attention for it. Exactly what they want and they have received!
    Posted by: Frank Location: omaha on Mar 28, 2008 at 09:41 AM
    Well I think we have to take a closer look at the owners of these dogs. Sure these animals have had bad traits bread into them, and sure they are agressive animals by nature but lets not forget the nurture factor. Lets take a good look at the people that want to own a pitbull and have it as a pet. The people in my neighborhood that own these dogs are the same people who have there kids run around the neightborhood unsupervised, the same people who don't mow there lawns, and the same people who chain there dog up for hours without proper food and water. I'm not gonna overgeneralize this group of people but we all know who were talking about here.
    Posted by: Amazed Location: N. Omaha on Mar 28, 2008 at 09:19 AM
    I feel this is just another attempt or avenue for people to try to keep Omaha and the state of Nebraska as conservative as possible. My younger brother has always had a fascination with the Pit breeds owning several over the yea