MONDAY ON NBC, it's an all new two hour return of the American Gladiators with new Gladiators and new events. Then on ten at ten, imagine going through an expensive medical treatment and having the money from a fundraiser just disappear. Could this happen to you? Mike McKnight investigates what questions you should ask before handing your money over to someone who promises a surefire investment. "Show Me My Money", Monday at ten only on 6 News.
The Weather Authority
Currents
Doppler Radar
7-Day
Find a Local Business with Local Lookup
 
WOWT.com on Demand
  • 6 On Your Cell
  • RSS Feeds
  • Desktop Alert
    		•
  • Text Alerts
  • Daily E-News
  • What’s on 6
    • MarketPlace
  • Restaurants
  • Auto Map
  • Business Connections
  • Financial Advice
  • Legal Advice
  • New Home Listings
  • Your Home, Your Investment
  • Entertainment
  • Recipes
  • Education
  • Jobs
  • The Wedding Planner
  • Martha's Tip of the Day
  • Advertise With WOWT
    • Man Attacked By Pit Bulls Save Email Print
    One killed by police, other dog found with owner
    Posted: 5:17 PM Mar 26, 2008
     Last Updated: 1:19 PM Mar 27, 2008
     Email Address: sixonline@wowt.com
    116 comments
    A | A | A

    An Omaha man was treated and released for injuries suffered during an attack by two pit bulls Wednesday afternoon.

    A police officer shot and killed one of the pit bulls shortly after the attack.

    Authorities searched for the other dog for several hours. It was located Wednesday night at the home of its 19-year-old owner. She has been cited for two counts of harboring a dangerous animal.

    The dog was taken by the Nebraska Humane Society.

    Hopeton Hewett has seen a lot in his 75 years, but he says he's never seen a day like this before, bitten seven times on the arm and dragged by two pit bulls.

    “It was scary, yes, I was taking my afternoon stroll on such a beautiful day and then I heard these patter feet behind me and I turned around and ahhh! I heard about these. I hope I don't die."

    Hewett says the dogs got hold of his arm and dragged him 10 feet before letting him go. He came stumbling home to Carolyn Walker. “He said the dogs got me, the dogs got me. I didn't understand and then he was bleeding all over.”

    Walker says the dogs have attacked before. “I'm glad to be alive,” says Hewett. “I don't want to dwell too much on that experience because it was frightening.”

    The Humane Society believes it issued citations to the owner of these same pit bulls just two weeks ago for allowing them to run loose.

    Email  del.icio.us   Google   Yahoo  digg
    More Stories
    Shooting Investigation

    Kristin's Crash Course in Mobile Threats

    Teens Need to Get the Text Message

    Case Underscores ID Theft Threat

    		 The Pool Haul

    Pooling Resources

    Coming Home

    Platte Funding Approved
    Post Your Comments
    First Name:
    Location:
    Enter Comments: characters left
    Email (optional):
    Email will not be displayed on site. For station contact purpose only.
    Read Comments
    Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
    Posted by: B Location: Omaha on Apr 11, 2008 at 03:11 PM
    Pit bull=angry, risky, mean natured dog. That is all there is to it, a ban is the right thing to do to keep kids and other pets safe.
    Posted by: luvmyAMSTmutt Location: Omaha on Mar 31, 2008 at 04:53 PM
    I own a mutt who’s about 20-30% AMST (DNA tested). She’s a sweet dog loves people. We had to move out of CB because the judge thought she had “majority characteristics ‘pit-bull’” DNA didn’t mater. I’m very against breed discrimination and think that irresponsible owners need to have harsher punishments. I think that people need to do their own research and stop listening to all the media hype. AMST have been around for many years yet ‘pit-bull’ attacks didn’t become an issue until the 80’s when people started getting them for guard dogs and tough look they think having one will give them. Wrong Reasons! This is the wrong breed for that! German Shepards and Cocker Spaniels have a very high number of human attacks yet you see nothing about them in the media! Stop the witch hunt and punish the so-called smarter species not the animals that are only following their upbringing. Last comment: when there is more than one dog, everything changes and the pack instinct kicks in!
    Posted by: Anonymous Location: RALSTON on Mar 31, 2008 at 02:45 PM
    first of all, for all the people who made dumb comments to this article....grow up and think about things a little more clearly. pit bulls or any other dog are not born mean, they are abused and grown to be mean by a brainless human. IT'S COMMON SENSE....think about it!!!
    Posted by: Against PITS Location: Omaha on Mar 30, 2008 at 11:13 AM
    To DD: Your post states in your first sentence that you are a well educated, strong and successful woman. SO WHAT! You patting yourself on the back?. This story is about pit bulls, not about "strong women". If you have 2 pit bulls, what for? One is not enough for you? They are of a breed that is and can be mean, and will turn on you. I suggest you watch them VERY carefully, especially when around your children. You have 2 just as a "status symbol"?
    Posted by: 550 hp Location: Here on Mar 30, 2008 at 05:55 AM
    I absolutely LOVE DOGS, but Pit-bulls are the only exception. I work for Cox Comm as an installer for all of their services and I generally am given routes in NE Omaha. I have worked for Cox for over 7 years and have performed hundreds of installs in North O and have encountered hundreds of Pit-bulls in that area. In that time period, I have NEVER encountered A SINGLE friendly Pit-bull, ever.. Granted, I have done other installs throughout the metro and have had "other breeds" that want to "kill me", but at the same time, I HAVE seen other Rotts, Dobies and even Chows that are friendly to me, but NEVER have I seen a friendly Pit-bull, "while working".. I stocked my Cox van with dog biscuits, mainly for Pits and I also carry "dog mace". About 10 years ago, a Cox Tech was attacked by the "customer's" so called friendly Pit in the back yard and the tech slammed his 28' fiberglass ladder on the Pit's back and killed it. I carry a "legal" gun permit(And gun) primarily for THAT reason...
    Posted by: Amanda Location: Omaha on Mar 29, 2008 at 10:36 PM
    All dogs should be banned from things like the Annual Arts Festival. Why do people think it is cool to drag a dog to a human event? What fun can it be for the dog. It is even scarier when it is an attack dog. I don't see status, I see a lawsuit.
    Posted by: Gary Location: Omaha on Mar 29, 2008 at 10:29 PM
    DD, Why the need for two? One isn't enough? So you're a strong educated woman. Why not have two cute weiner dogs? Why live with the possibility of getting mauled? I guess I just don't get it. Good luck! Hope I don't see you on the news.
    Posted by: Heather Location: Dewitt Ne on Mar 29, 2008 at 07:47 PM
    Hi I just wanted to say that I have two pitbulls of my own. Both are very sweet and gentle. We have a three year old son and allow people to bring their dogs over with them when they come to visit and we have not had any problems with any kinds of attacks. I just want people to know that most of the attacks are by dogs who are not treated or trained properly. As far as I know all of my neighbors except two love my dogs. Most people fear pitbulls becuase of the few cases they hear on the news. Funny thing is, is I hear of many other dogs growling and biting people but they are never talked about on the news. I know someone whos little boy got his face bit off by a black lab how come no one talks about situations like that. Most people don't want to hear anything but bad things about pitbulls well these people just don't have a heart. It has been proven in many situations that pitbulls can be adopted out and taken care of without any problems if given to the right people.
    Posted by: Anonymous on Mar 29, 2008 at 05:26 PM
    Marilyn, A pittbull attacking a 73 year old man this week, and mauling a childs genitals off several years ago are just 2 examples of why this breed is useless.
    Posted by: Vicki Location: Millard on Mar 29, 2008 at 02:47 PM
    I got my pittbull from a humane society, three years ago. I feel that I saved her from a terrible life if the wrong person would of got her before me. I have three kids she is our family dog. The best dog we have ever had. We would not trade her for anything. All the kids love her in the neighborhood.I even take her up to the school to pick up my kids. My pittbull is perfectly safe. Just an overweight lap dog that loves to lick you and sleep with you at night.
    Posted by: Karma Location: South Omaha on Mar 29, 2008 at 08:22 AM
    To Tury~as a bully breed owner and lover of the breed, I volunteer with a bully breed rescue in another state. I agree that all backyard breeders should spay and neuter their dogs. The problem in this state and other states is too many dogs are falling into the wrong hands by greedy backyard breeders just wanting the money. We have a litter of puppies dumped on us a month. Sometimes the whole litter dies because the breeders don't bother to vaccinate. Then the dogs die of parvo or distemper.You people that think we should go into a ban I dare you to take a walk through a Kansas City shelter and see all those sad eyes looking up at you. If you can still talk of a ban you have no heart. Every day there are thousands of pitbulls put to sleep all across this nation. I agree the breeding needs to be under control but these dogs need rescued and rehabilitated. God put these dogs here~it's a travesty to kill these dogs and other breeds every day~Shame on the human race for having no heart~
    Posted by: Marilyn Location: Mid town on Mar 29, 2008 at 08:10 AM
    I'm a 70 year old woman and I own a pitbull. She is my best friend. I wouldn't take a million dollars for her. My dog would not bite anyone and anyone from the media is invited to come and meet her and see if she doesn't change your mind about pitbulls. If you need to know any thing else about pitbulls ask Rachel Ray or Ceaser Milan. They are the BEST dogs in the world. People that fight them and abuse them give them a bad name.
    Posted by: Banyon Location: South Omaha on Mar 29, 2008 at 08:05 AM
    Over 4000 thousand men and women killed in Iraq. How many killed by pitbulls? Don't you think we are misplacing our priorities here. We want to save human lives by stopping a war.
    Posted by: Wil Location: Omaha on Mar 29, 2008 at 05:51 AM
    I feel that if it were any other dogs such as a couple of Labrabor Retrievers, that were not socialized well, there would not as big of an issue about this. Because pitbulls have such a bad wrap (mostly because council bluffs has their problems) in Iowa it will spill over into Omaha. I don't think the breed shouldn't be punished for wrong doings, it's the owners who are responsible. Licensed dogs should have a clean bill of health, and responsible owners should have certificates for completion of Obedience classes. If not then fine the owner. Obedience classes are cheap and easy to accomplish. Any breed of dog could have done the same thing!
    Posted by: anonymous Location: omaha on Mar 28, 2008 at 11:10 PM
    I've worked at several humane societies and have seen Pits that had to be destroyed after almost severing the arm of their owner. I have seen Pits covered with bite marks, horrible wounds and blood from being pitted in fights. I have seen Pits terrified of the other dogs in the kennels. God only know what they might have witnessed to get like that. I've seen many Pits that cowered whenever anyone approached them. Dogs that had never had a good day in their lives. I've seen countless stray Pits who had to be humanely destroyed because their owners never came to get them back. Although many Pits are friendly, they are muscle bound and possess a hard mouth (as opposed to the soft mouth of a retrieving dog, who bites more gently). Most of the other dog breeds don't bite in the same manner that a Pit does. Pits have a tendency to grab hold and not let go, and also a tendency to shake their heads violently when doing so, which causes more damage. Many pits are more likely to nip hard when playing. Pits also have a strong desire to chase and catch someone or some other animal running away from them. I suggest that breeding of Pitbulls and Pit crosses should be made illegal, unless the owner can demonstrate the knowledge and skill required to handle the breed safely and also has the proper housing and fencing to keep the public safe from their Pits. These Pits should be neutered or spayed, as they are usually less aggressive then.
    Posted by: Anon Location: Nebraska on Mar 28, 2008 at 10:30 PM
    I can't help but question who would be enforcing a law banning pitt bulls in Omaha? Omaha can't even keep people committing violent crimes against other people off the streets. Lets focus on the people killing other people and once we get that under control we can discuss if a ban is needed on pitt bulls in Omaha.
    Posted by: Sean Location: Omaha on Mar 28, 2008 at 08:06 PM
    Lets start banning PEOPLE with felonies from our city. That would cut down on both crimes and pit bull attacks. I have an American Pit Bull Terrier and I trust him around anything but an alpha male dog. I know we cannot actually ban people with felonies from the city, but we can make sure that those people dont own pit bulls or any other animal capable of doing excessive harm. If we ban pit bulls from the city, we need to ban Rots, German Shepherds, Dobies, Mastiffs, American Bulldogs, Chows, Boxers, Great Danes, and Giant Schnauzers as well. Once these idiot owners cant have a Pit Bull, which one of these breeds do you think they are going to buy next. Why dont you hear of any Pit Bull attacks west of north and south omaha? mmmmmmmmm, thats a good question.
    Posted by: Janon Location: Omaha on Mar 28, 2008 at 01:25 PM
    I have owned a pit bull for 3 years. She is a smart, loyal and loving. It's all in the training. PEOPLE are to blame, not the dogs.
    Posted by: angie on Mar 28, 2008 at 01:14 PM
    Now if i am not mistaken, i thought it was the law to have your animals on a leash at all times and in a fenced in area? if these pits are not muzzled there will be more injuries.
    Posted by: Pam on Mar 28, 2008 at 10:54 AM
    It is the owners fault this man was attacked, not the dogs. I'm tired of reading about these poor animals suffering because their owners are stupid and irresponsible!!! Owners have responsibilities to their pets to protect, love, care for and train them. When this happens it is because the owner didn't do what they were supposed to do!
    Posted by: Sharon Location: West Omaha on Mar 28, 2008 at 10:27 AM
    The laws are not tough enough or enforced enough with Pit owners. A citation or warning is not going to make a difference. They were at that owners house 2 weeks prior. Mr.Hewetts attack would not have happened if those dogs would of been muzzled. Yes, there are responsible owners, however they are Few in numbers. With this said. I believe if Omaha doesn't ban this breed then they should make EVERY Pit owner take their dog and have it trained and socialized and Muzzled when out side. Why is it that we hear of these attacks are occurring in North Omaha? It's because of all the gangs and shootings and break-ins. These Pit owners think by having this breed it is protecting them from that. The meaner the more protection. Sad but true. In the past I had a huge German Shepard. The sweetest dog. Raised and trained but very intimidating to others. I was not afraid to go anywhere with him on his lead. It is the owners responsibility. Omaha, step up to the plate, if you don't ban then Muzzle
    Posted by: Ray Location: Council Bluffs on Mar 28, 2008 at 09:49 AM
    I live in Council Bluffs and have an American Pit bull terrier. C.B and Omaha does not have a Pit Bull problem. Our society has a problem with its people turning a blind eye to these people (who ever they are or where every they live) who do not control their animals, any animal. I truly free sorry for this gentleman and hope he can take action against the owner of these animals. Some action may need to be take against these dog if they attacked him unprovoked, which may include putting them down. I work in Omaha and see every day police driving by people with unleashed Pit Bulls, If Omaha has a law why do the not enforce it. We need stronger laws that hold all animal owners accountable for their animals not just Pit Bulls. Our City Council to include Ms. Branigan took the easy way out and still has not addressed the issue of all animals running loose or owners not being held accountable for their actions. The law over here has reduced the number of bites by Pit Bulls but has done nothing about the Labs that have bit people; Both City’s must hold the owners accountable! We will never change people’s minds if they are closed and not willing to grow and learn. I see plenty of dogs that bite and are not given a second thought because they are cute little ankle bitters. Does it make it any better or worse, these animals are not properly socialized and that is not right at any breed or size of animal that is living with people
    Posted by: Jeff on Mar 27, 2008 at 11:14 PM
    "Ignorance breeds fear"? Well, Jill, sometimes ignorance breeds an unwise sense of safety. Like with Hopeton Hewett, maybe he wouldn't have been attacked if dog lovers hadn't lulled him into a false sense of safety. Let's see what people wrote AFTER he was attacked. "They do not attack for no reason." Really, Amanda? Then why do you say in a later post, "I'm not saying the elderly man did anything..." And "They are great family dogs." Yes, B, but don't let grandpa go for a walk alone. "It's not the dogs that are mean it's the owners." No, Sara, I'm pretty sure it was the dogs that attacked Mr. Hewett, not the owner. "Betta fish are known to be violent..." Anon, I'll remember that the next time I see a couple Betta tracking me down the street.
    Posted by: jennifer Location: south omaha on Mar 27, 2008 at 11:01 PM
    First no dog no matter the breed should be roaming the streets, that alone can end badly. Owners need to be held responsible for the actions of their dogs. End of Story! I have two pitbulls, they are chained in the backyard and watched while outside. Now my neighbors do the same, I am constintly running them out of my yard because they are charging at my dogs. But if a fight were to start my dogs would be blame because of their breed! To Mr Hewett, as a pitbull owner I apologize for what you are going through now, it should have never happened had the dogs owners been more responsible.
    Posted by: DD Location: west omaha on Mar 27, 2008 at 10:24 PM
    Gary-I happen to own 2 pit bulls and I am a well educated successful strong woman. I am not, as you stated all pit bull owners are, a wimp, drug dealer or just plain stupid. I happen to have two amazing dogs who not only love and adore myself and our family but all our friends. I am a responsible DOG owner that takes precautions with my animals but would take these same precautions with any breed of dog I owned. People become so defensive and immediately jump to the idea of banning a specific breed from the city limits when again this is not the only breed of dog that will attack. Any dog has the capacity to attack, especially a dog that is not cared for. It truly disgusts me that ignorant irresponsible pit bull owners give this breed such a bad name.
    Posted by: Erin Location: Omaha on Mar 27, 2008 at 10:18 PM
    If you're going to own a large dog, you had better properly obedience train your dog to respond to your commands, and make sure you dont allow your dogs to run loose. Any dog can attack. I'm no longer a dog owner (I used to have a Bouvier) but I like to think I'm a responsible dog owner. My dog was obedience trained, was properly supervised, and I NEVER allowed him off lead, even tho I trusted him not to run off and eat a jogger. I trusted my dog, but I didnt trust him THAT much. I didnt want to have to pay for injuries, didnt want my dog shot, and I didnt want people to think he was vicious. He was a barker, but not a biter. It's the owner's fault that her dogs attacked that man, for allowing them to run free, and for apparently not training them correctly. Hope her fine is HUGE! and that she pays the medical bills that the man probably has to pay now. Hopefully she wont ever own another dog again. I'd feel sorry for the dog if she does.
    Posted by: bob Location: omaha on Mar 27, 2008 at 08:14 PM
    TO steph, I don't work with dogs but every time I read about a dog biting accident, its a pit bull. Why is that, I have never read about killer rat terriers, and how many people that have dogs like this actually take them to the vet. These dogs have never been in youre office or any other one I am betting. These people make these dogs bad i agree, but until the public becomes smarter than dogs they will keep raseing bitting pit bulls. The news just reports it they dont just say hay pit bulls are bad.
    Posted by: LSB Location: Fremont on Mar 27, 2008 at 06:42 PM
    I currently own 2 American Bulldogs, I had a Doberman Pincher until he died of old age a couple years ago. I also have 3 children who have grown up with these dogs and the dogs have grown up with them. My youngest daughter has a scar on her face from a dog bite, the dog that gave her that scar was a miniture schnauser, not one of these "viscious" breeds as some call them. My dogs have never hurt anyone and are the sweetest things. (BTW American Bulldogs are not known for agression as Pit Bulls are, but have a much calmer temperment in the overall breed. They are mistaken for Pit Bulls because they look very similar if you dont know the difference) The only way they would hurt anyone is to knock them over wanting attention. It is not the breed of dog, it is the temperment, breeding and how they are raised. More small dogs bite than large dogs, they just dont do as much damage.
    Posted by: Jill Location: omaha on Mar 27, 2008 at 04:30 PM
    I commend the people that stand up for the American Pit Bull Terriers. I do feel for Mr Hewett that his first encounter was with pit bulls' whose owner is totally irresponsible. Ignorance breeds fear and I make this challenge to the TV stations that continually put these dogs on the wrong side-Do a segment about the dog and do some research. Web sites like badrap.com can help. You will see that if the owners of the dogs are held responsible for their dogs and a greater penalty to the owners is put in place this type of behavior will go down. Unfortunately once you own and get to know this breed you will see why they are being exploited. I agree with Tury that it should be a requirement for dog training and socialization-especially with these dogs. Channel 6, please be the one,like other subjects, educate the public on this.
    Posted by: Steph Location: Omaha on Mar 27, 2008 at 04:09 PM
    I work in the veterinary field and I am so sick of the stigma that is associated with Pit Bulls. Pit Bulls don't go wandering around looking for people to attack. Educate yourselves, people...I've had more Labs, Rat terriers, Malteses, Shepherds, Dalmations, and mixed breed dogs come after me at work than Pits. I'm not saying those breeds are "biters" they're just as much a dog as a pitbull. The media does nothing to help either, they just play into the stereotypical "pit bull attack" as everyone else. How many people are bit by non-"bully breeds" everyday? They're never on the news are they?
    Posted by: Kent on Mar 27, 2008 at 04:01 PM
    Everyone who's concerned about viscious dogs, you don't need to post anymore. Just let the dog lovers fight it out. They can't decide amongnst themselves whether pitbulls grow up nice and have to be trained to be mean, or if they're naturally mean and have to be trained to be nice. The only thing apparent to me from these posts is that pitbull owners are naturally agressive.
    Posted by: Jeff on Mar 27, 2008 at 03:50 PM
    I sorry, to everyone looking forward to the Rosenblatt walk. The Rosenblatt events promoter and OPD won't allow the event because of the liability due to a high likelihood several people would be injured. Amanda - I'm surprised at you. If it's irresponsible owners that make the dogs violent, why would you take the walk when you know nothing about the dogs owners? Feel free to explain.
    Posted by: Anonymous Location: Council Bluffs on Mar 27, 2008 at 03:46 PM
    I have owned a pit bull for seven years now. I trust this dog completely with my life, and she has shown me more love, affection and loyalty than most humans are capable of. I know deep down that she would never harm my husband and I, but I don't trust her as far as I can throw her when it comes to strangers. In my experience, I have learned that pit bulls are very unpredictable. I don't know if a ban is going to solve any problems when it comes to attacks, because people will definitely continue to break the law and own them regardless. I think the ban in Council Bluffs has had positive effects.
    Posted by: JP Location: Omaha on Mar 27, 2008 at 02:37 PM
    I've owned Pit Bulls and made a point to properly train, socialize and spay and neuter them. I've never had any problems with them. They were wonderful members of the family, and got a long great with my kids, cats and neighbor dogs. But just because they were wonderful, didn't mean I didn't take proper precautions. My back yard was like Fort Knox, privacy fencing and buried chicken wire incase they were to try to dig out. I would muzzle them in public incase other dogs ran up on them... it would only take one bite to kill a smaller dog. Unfortunately most people aren't as responsible or take the time to understand the needs of the breed, they use them as "status symbols" and have no concern for the animals or their neighbors. Ban IGNORANT PEOPLE, not the breed.
    Posted by: Repsonse to JAY Location: Lincoln on Mar 27, 2008 at 01:10 PM
    Do your research. Pit bull breeds are VERY friendly if they have responsible owners. I know cockerspaniels that have attacked! In case you didn't know this little fact....no matter male or female cockerspaniels are VERY tempermental as are dalmations who should be watched CLOSELY!! Think of an abused child that couldn't tell ANYONE and had to live with it their ENTIRE life. Pit bulls are the abused kid...maybe if you're a great pet owner you should own one and save one dog from living a life where everything thinks they are terrible!!!!
    Posted by: Heather Location: Gretna on Mar 27, 2008 at 01:09 PM
    The next time I go to the local pet store and one of the Napoleonic lap dogs that visits attacks and snarls at my 2 absolutely docile bully breed doggies, I am going to call the police. Fair is fair. If pit bull breeds cause dog attacks, then do cars cause car accidents? Irresponsible owners cause dogs to behave poorly. Period. Not all bully owners are "gangstas". Parents need to watch how their kids and teens are exposed to these breeds in society and educate them. A young girl at the pet store yakking on her cell phone pointed at my dog and said "Look Mom, I want a fighting dog like that!" I said, "First, she is not a fighting dog, she is a loyal and affectionate pet, and second, it is a shame that your parents are allowing you to believe such ignorance about the breed. I hope you never own one." As for the selective breeding, Sir- pits were bred for many, many years to be loyal to humans. Owners of ALL breeds should go through basic temperament testing and obedience training.
    Posted by: Disgusted Location: Lincoln on Mar 27, 2008 at 01:03 PM
    What in the world is wrong with these owners!!! I am a PROUD owner of a pit bull mix breed. The neighborhood kids love to play with him!!! Why? Because he is trained well!! I feel terrible for the man this happened to but I feel worse for the dog that had a HORRIBLE IRRESPONSIBLE owner who needs to be BANNED from owning ANY animal!!!!
    Posted by: Cari Brown Location: Omaha on Mar 27, 2008 at 12:51 PM
    Well I hate to burst your bubble but a Pit Bull’s instinct is to NOT TO BE HUMAN AGGRESSIVE!. Animal aggressive…yes, but never human, unless trained to be. Dogs in general may be born with a “dominant” personality, but an “aggressive” personality is trained. It’s like HATE. Humans are not born to hate, they are taught to hate. To JB’s comment :” of course like typical Pit bull owners, she wont be able to afford the damages her dog has done to this man.” RE: Are you trying to say that only poor people own Pits? I worked in Pit Bull Rescue but no longer do because we looked for good homes not money. I’m sure that some of the people that adopted from me would disagree with your comment. Such as the family that owns 3 business and 2 homes. The other family who’s wife is an Omaha radio personality or even the Air Force Pilot that fights for our country. If you don't own a Pit then no one really needs your opinion because you can't give advice if you can't see both sides.
    Posted by: hockeymom11 Location: omaha on Mar 27, 2008 at 12:43 PM
    I have to agree that its how the dog is brought up. I was attacked and severly bitten by a Doberman when i was a child and for a while there they were the worst breed in the world. Let's hold the owners accountable for keeping their pets under control just like every other pet owner. Have a friend who has had several pit's - none of them had a mean bone in their body and this last one is a big lap dog who thinks he is humane. I have always been a golden retriever lover but if i could have a pit like his i would take it over a golden in a minute. Blame the owners not the dogs!
    Posted by: LD Location: Omaha on Mar 27, 2008 at 12:18 PM
    I agree with the comments that state that it is how the dog is raised and trained that effects how their behavior is. The nicest breed in the world can be trained to be "mean"; and likewise, the most fierce breed can be trained to be "gentle". However, that doesn't absolve the owner for "not knowing that the dogs were loose". If I owned a dog that was loose and it bit someone, I should be held responsible for what the dog did and take appropriate action with the dog. If it was deemed by the Humane Society that the dog needed to be put down, then so be it. I feel that the police were in the right to defend themselves by putting the one dog down that was attacking them. Many will say, "but what about the owner's rights". I say that if you harbor a dog that has been trained to be vicious and the dog gets loose and put down by the police in self-defense, then don't complain about no longer having the dog. You couldn't control it for yourself, so law enforcement did it for you.
    Posted by: Anonymous on Mar 27, 2008 at 11:58 AM
    Here's the real scoop on pitbulls. Back in the 18th and 19th centuries there was a popular sport in England called bull baiting. This so-called sport consisted of putting a number of bull dogs in a pen with a bull and betting on which dog would kill the bull. This activity was mercifully outlawed. It was also mandated that bulldogs have the trait of the well known lock-jaw bred out of the breed. Before this could be completely implemented the breed of pitbull was created for the sport of dog fighting. The pitbull was created by crossing a mastiff with an old style (lock jaw) bulldog. Therefore the breed of pitbull was not created for any practical purpose (hunting, tracking, herding). The pitbull was and is bred to be an efficient killer. Unfortunately no amount of good intentions will make the pitbull more predictable. And we all know that many pitbull owners don't have good intentions for their "pets" to begin with.
    Posted by: pete Location: Omaha on Mar 27, 2008 at 11:58 AM
    I'd say, is to lock the owners of these dangerous dogs up with other people's dogs and see how they fare.
    Posted by: backpacker Location: Omaha on Mar 27, 2008 at 11:36 AM
    Back in 2006 a couple of Pit Bulls broke through their owners chain link fence and attacked my dog and wife in our yard. Now when I work in my yard I go out fully armed for protection; shoot to kill. Now is the time to BAN all Pit Bulls from Omaha. They have no place here.
    Posted by: Jeremy Location: West O on Mar 27, 2008 at 11:03 AM
    I own a Pit Bull. I understand why society hates them. I dont even trust a Pit Bull that I am not familiar with. IT IS ALL HOW THEY ARE RAISED. Most of these attacks are in North Omaha...go figure!
    Posted by: Rick Location: Papillion on Mar 27, 2008 at 10:53 AM
    just another thing to worry about in North Omaha.......either get shot or attacked by dogs!
    Posted by: Tury Location: omaha on Mar 27, 2008 at 10:46 AM
    I suppose that a ban on pitbulls is just too much to hope for. How about pitbull owners be required to attend a special training and socialization course? How about pitbull owners who are not licensed breeders be required to spay and neuter their dogs? It doesn't seem too much to ask from people who feel the need to own an animal that is bred to kill. Wouldn't we have much higher expectations from the handlers of other dangerous animals? For that matters all dog owners should train and socialize their dogs. And, if a person is not a professional breeder they should have their dogs fixed. There's enough homeless animals at the animal shelter.I'm sorry.
    Posted by: Carrie on Mar 27, 2008 at 10:13 AM
    The owner says she had no idea of how the dogs got out! Well she can't tell me that these dogs have never got out before. She also knows her dogs and knows what their capable of doing.
    Posted by: Sara Location: North Omaha on Mar 27, 2008 at 09:48 AM
    OK first off it is all in how you raise you dogs. Pitbulls are very smart animals and they are very loyal to the owners ( i know own one) I think that putting a ban on a dog is unfair. Just think pitbulls are now the popular "badass" dog. 15 yrs ago it was german shephards that everyone was so scared of and people were making mean 10 yrs ago it was dobbermans and now its pitbulls..get it RIGHT people its not the dogs that are mean its the owners that make them mean. We need greater punishments for the owners of those dogs.. I think that if i was feed lead and chained to a concrete block and left outside in all weather conditions i might be a angry also..
    Posted by: Jay Location: Omaha on Mar 27, 2008 at 09:29 AM
    Dogs have been domesticated long enough that we know which breeds have been engineered for companionship, and which breeds are for protection. Hundreds of years of selective breeding have given the 'pit bull' family many identifiable traits, including the ability to bite down on anything with incredible force and to keep that bite clamped on despite mortal injury to the dog. That trait alone should make anyone think twice about owning or breeding one. To those who preach the 'family friendly' bit, make no mistake how unpredictable these animals are. Once their instincts are triggered a human doesn't stand a chance against them. And no one can say what will trigger the instincts; a smell, a sound, or even a gesture. Keeping a dog like this in your house or even allowing them in our city is a big gamble with anyone's life who dares to cross their path. When was the last time you heard of a Chihuahua dragging someone 10 feet? Does the 'benefit' of owning one outweigh the potential risk?
    Posted by: Amanda Location: Omaha on Mar 27, 2008 at 09:23 AM
    Jeff, I would, because I'm pretty dang sure those Pit Bulls wouldn't attack! It's not their in their "blood" that makes them attack, it's simply irresponsible owners. The only difference between a pit bull and a staffordshire terrier is that Pits use to be used for game and staffies are used for show, that's why the AKC allows staffies to be registered, not pits. I 100% agree w/you PG, please look up info. about this breed before you form your opinions.
    Posted by: Biff Location: Elkmaha on Mar 27, 2008 at 09:19 AM
    I've yet to see one, but I'm sure 'good' pit bulls exist. I highly doubt that those owned by a typical 19 y.o. can be included in that group. Whoever sells these dogs needs to ensure (to the best of their ability) that they are going to good owners. Owners need to adhere to the laws regarding pets! If there's a problem with a dog escaping from the house when a door is opened, keep them in a pen! If they won't stay in their fenced yard, chain 'em up! Common sense isn't totally dead - is it? I hope Mr. Hewett has a complete recovery.
    Posted by: MM Location: Omaha on Mar 27, 2008 at 09:03 AM
    I think these people are taking dog training lessons from Michael Vick.
    Posted by: Amanda Location: Omaha on Mar 27, 2008 at 08:59 AM
    The last sentence of this article says it all. TWO WEEKS AGO a previous citation was issued.....and now here the dogs are loose yet again. They obviously are getting out somehow and are a danger to anyone in that neighborhood....and the owner didn't care enough to resolve the situation and find a way to keep her pets safely inside. Just from seeing the dogs on TV and how they were charging and attacking.....it is obvious they were trained to do that. Those poor dogs were raised to be aggressive. The owner should be ashamed.
    Posted by: JB Location: Omaha on Mar 27, 2008 at 08:52 AM
    And of course like typical Pit bull owners, she wont be able to afford the damages her dog has done to this man.
    Posted by: Half Fast Location: Omaha on Mar 27, 2008 at 08:46 AM
    Dogs are unreasoning pack creatures driven by instincts. Prey, protection or fear are the three drives that motivate them. Pit bulls have been bred for a strong prey drive. That is why they attack unprovoked. Anything walking by them is in their mind prey, and they will attack for seemingly no reason. Dogs that have been confined by a fence are unable to exercise this drive, and when loose, it goes into over drive. Owners that don't understand dog's drives and work to control them by being the pack leader are stupid and irresponsible. Ed Frawley in WI has been breeding working dogs for 40 years, and has written many training articles. Here is one of the basics: http://www.leerburg.com/groundwork.htm Raising a 'good' dog is not for the lazy or stupid.
    Posted by: Anonymous on Mar 27, 2008 at 08:44 AM
    Dogs don't just attack! Please, I live across the street from a couple mean dogs. All they do is run against the fence and bark and bark. If that fence wasn't there, they'd be over it and attacking me. I can see it in their eyes! I've never done a thing to them! I worry that the fence will give way when I have my 6 month old daughter with me!
    Posted by: John Location: Omaha on Mar 27, 2008 at 08:42 AM
    You can find information as well as misinformation, both in favor and against the pitbull breed. You have to take into consideration though that those in favor of the breed more often then not make money from marketing pitbulls. What could be easier then perpetuating a breed with no standard for the breed other than big and mean. Even the most ardent pitbull advocates must admit that the breed was created for the so-called sport of dog fighting. Which brings up the question, why should a person feel the need to own an animal that is only bred to be an efficient killer.
    Posted by: Mike B. Location: Omaha on Mar 27, 2008 at 08:28 AM
    My opinion is this. It is NOT so much the breed of the dog, but how it is trained and treated. Probably 80% of how it is trained and treated and 20% of the breed . To Le Shawn, What was the officer to do to calm it? The dog was very aggressive, and had already attacked and bitten someone. Was the officer to say "awww, come here puppy, nice puppy, it's alright", and offer it a Scooby Snack to calm it down? I think the officer had no choice but to put this raging, mad, and aggressive animal down. He did the right thing. Apparently it should have been done long time ago. This is a tragedy that was due to happen. What if it was a child that those dogs attacked??!! We would Be reading about pit bulls killing a child. The dogs deserved what they got. Time to put the other one asleep for good. It is too aggressive to rehabilitate. The owner(s) should be jailed. Where's the responsibility!!!! Apparently they don't have any nor do they care.
    Posted by: Anonymous on Mar 27, 2008 at 08:26 AM
    No most people who own a Lexus SUV in West O have one because they CAN AFFORD IT. People who have busted their butts to graduate high school, go to college, go on to grad school, and hold steady jobs. Owning a pit bull on the north side is a status symbol because that shows how intellegent they are. No real goals in life except to show everyone how cool they think they are.
    Posted by: Goin' To The Dogs Location: Omaha on Mar 27, 2008 at 08:17 AM
    All dog owners should be required to get their dogs trained and should have a course in dog ownership. All dogs are potentially dangerous. People should get alarm systems, not dogs, or some other type of pet.
    Posted by: S Location: Omaha on Mar 27, 2008 at 08:09 AM
    To Anon location Nebraska - I hope you are not serious about banning all dogs. Most dogs are loveable and wonderful additions to families. Even pits can make great pets when they have great owners. Saying that large dogs should be banned is crazy since large breeds are gentle giants. When have you heard of a Great Dane, St. Brainard, or Newfoundland attacking someone? It's usually medium size or small breeds biting people. Maybe you just need to have a heart for animals and it sounds like you don't.
    Posted by: JMD Location: Omaha on Mar 27, 2008 at 08:03 AM
    Another case of irresponsible owners. If you abuse or neglect any breed of dog, this can happen. How about a mandatory spay/neuter ban like they have now in LA. The owner of these two dogs shoud be banned from ever owning an animal again. Don't ban the breed, ban rotten owners!
    Posted by: b Location: Omaha on Mar 27, 2008 at 07:31 AM
    I have a pit bull and he is the nicest dog I've ever owned. He'll play with my kids all day long. I really think it depends the way they're raise to be. They are great family dogs.
    Posted by: Joe Location: West Omaha on Mar 27, 2008 at 06:58 AM
    To Anon, I agree with you. Everything that has the tendency to be violent should be taken out back and shot. Guess that means humans would be in line with the dogs and beta fish. We are more violent than any of them. Thank God we have people like Officer Platt. He's good at taking out the trash. Maybe they should put the officer who shot the dog on administrative leave until the investigation is done. The bottom line is this, if you train your dog to kill, it will kill. If you train your dog to be gentle and not a killer, it won't be a killer. I love dogs. But if I was in the officer's shoes or even the gentleman that was attacked, I would have shot the dog too. To JK, how many people have been attacked by a Lexus SUV? To Ami, you heard two gunshots. Did you actually see the officer shoot the dog? No. Get over it!! Maybe showing it on TV is a "wake up" call for people with dangerous pets. Watch out Fluffy, you're next. Sit Boo Boo sit, good dog. "Ruff!!"
    Posted by: citizen on Mar 27, 2008 at 06:55 AM
    Keep in mind, folks, that OPD DOES NOT answer these type of calls UNLESS the dog catchers call them. The damage is done by the time the cops decide to show up. When I was attacked years ago the cops showed up 3 days later and just told the owner to keep her dog tied up.
    Posted by: JK Location: Omaha on Mar 26, 2008 at 11:38 PM
    Owning a pit bull on the north side is simply a status symbol. Owning a Lexus SUV in West Omaha is also a status symbol. I don't see much difference. It's all good.
    Posted by: PG Location: Omaha on Mar 26, 2008 at 11:09 PM
    Take some time and learn about APBTs. http://www.badrap.org/rescue/breed.cfm Bad owners, media hype, and people's overall mis-information continue to cast a poor light on APBTs.
    Posted by: Anon Location: Nebraska on Mar 26, 2008 at 10:50 PM
    Omaha should ban all breeds of dogs, as all of them are capable of attacking if treated poorly. Stop these overzealous AKC breeders from pouring so many puppies into the hands of insolent people for a quick buck. Maybe in doing this we should also ban cats, birds, heck lets ban hamsters and small rodents too. Oh and Betta fish are known to be violent... Omaha get to it.....!!!! Please people, learn the behavior of an animal and how it's environment can effect said behavior before you judge just what is a danger and what is not. All large dogs should be banned, that is, if you want to protect people from what bad owners can lead an innocent animal to become.
    Posted by: Lori Location: omaha on Mar 26, 2008 at 10:50 PM
    North Omaha pit bulls = tragedy. North Omahans don't keep pit bulls as PETS, they keep them as fighting machines. Why don't we do something constructive in this city for once and adopt a breed ban like Council Bluffs? Mace or guns, everyone wanting to enjoy a nice spring stroll, especially in North O, should be ready to put these worthless animals in their place. I hope they took the 2nd dog away to be put down.
    Posted by: Bob Location: Omaha on Mar 26, 2008 at 10:34 PM
    How many innocent people have to be mauled before stiffer penalties are imposed on owners of attacking dogs? Owners whose dogs attack others should be marinated in dog chow gravy and left as snacks for other dogs.
    Posted by: M Location: Millard on Mar 26, 2008 at 10:22 PM
    AMEN "Z" A dog is 'taught' to be mean. Why were they just running loose on the streets. If you cant take CARE of your animals and keep them in check, you should give them up!
    Posted by: anon Location: NE on Mar 26, 2008 at 10:09 PM
    I'll tell you what provoked these dogs. Neglect. These dogs were unsupervised. Dogs are like kids. If unsupervised and unloved they don't know how to behave. They don't know right from wrong. I'm very thankful this man survived. As for the dogs that attacked...(two times called on) they need to be put down and the owners need to pay for damages. This man has suffered because of their negligence. Dont blame the breed. Blame the upbringing.
    Posted by: Dave Location: Papillion on Mar 26, 2008 at 10:09 PM
    So then why can't we ban gang bangers and fatherless children from being allowed in the city or state? Its documented statistically that if your a gang member you are more likely to kill other innocent people,sell drugs,etc... And children with no father figure in their lives have a much higher chance of ending up in prisoon and being violent. I know you will say those are people and can be rehabilitated. Welll so can dogs,including pit-bulls. Its starts with their blood,but that can be changed. I have a friend who has had 10 or 12 pits in his life time,none of them ever attacked any thing other than their food dish let alone a person.
    Posted by: Essie Location: Outside Omaha on Mar 26, 2008 at 10:08 PM
    You people don't get it - it's all in how the dog is raised. My bro-in-law got a pitbull puppy when my youngest child was a baby. He babysit for me plenty and brought the dog along occasionally. This dog absolutely adores my kids and in 11 years has never growled, barked, bared his teeth or anything EXCEPT when a stranger came to the door or approached my kids. He never has charged anyone and doesn't even try to get out of the yard even when people walk by his fence. He'll watch them, but he won't act aggressive unless they attempt to come into his backyard, pet him, or talk to my kids. If he knows you, he's fine. If you come to the house and I'm home or my bro-in-law is home, even if he doesn't know you, he won't act aggressive but he will watch every move you make. Funny tho', he was at my house with my youngest one day when someone tried to break in the front door. Needless to say that was one crook who will regret it for the rest of his life (nice limp there too bub!).
    Posted by: Ami Location: Omaha on Mar 26, 2008 at 10:06 PM
    I am saddened that you chose to show the officer shoot the animal. I agree that the dog needed to be put down, however I believe that the story would have been just as effective had you just said that office put the down down.
    Posted by: shanon Location: omaha on Mar 26, 2008 at 10:00 PM
    My best friend has one she adopted and lives in a small town with her 2 small kids and husband,Lady acts like a real lady when ever I am there however i always have my guard on as she is a very strong girl and I have a 10 year old who thinks she is a puppy.
    Posted by: LeShawn Location: Omaha on Mar 26, 2008 at 09:58 PM
    When does PETA come in and condem the Officer for shooting the dog. Everybody was so mad at Michael Vick for making money off the so called vicious animals. He was doing what a lot of people have been wanting anyway. He was killing them, but made a few dollars on the side. Where is everybody that was out for his blood. Come on someone say how this cop could have found a way to calm the animal without killing it. You people are funny
    Posted by: Jeff on Mar 26, 2008 at 09:56 PM
    Amanda, I'm sure your terrier loves people. Apparently these dogs love people, too. For everyone who believes dogs only attacked when provoked, let's try an experiment. Let's put a couple dozen pit bulls in, say, Rosenblatt Stadium. Then everyone who thinks they can walk safely from home plate, through the outfields, and back again--let those people prove that the dogs won't attack. Any takers?
    Posted by: justme Location: omaha on Mar 26, 2008 at 09:40 PM
    My question is has this family even be citited for having a dangerous animal in the past and if so why does he still have it and why wasn't the animal on a leash or in a secured fenced yard.
    Posted by: anonymous Location: Omaha on Mar 26, 2008 at 09:39 PM
    My Father, near 60 was walking with his walking stick near Carter Lake Ia (still Omaha though) and all of a sudden a pit bull climbed the fence and went lunging after him. My dad did nothing to provoke him, he was far away from the fence minding his own business. Lets just say I am glad he had his walking stick... Pit bulls need to be banned. (no I am not endorsing abuse, but if it came down to my life or a dog out to get it, you best bet I'm saving myself)
    Posted by: jamal Location: north o on Mar 26, 2008 at 09:29 PM
    I see pit bulls every where stop saying north every time somebody get hurt people get shot and robbed and bite by dogs other places too.
    Posted by: Carl Werferson Location: North Omaha on Mar 26, 2008 at 09:21 PM
    I fought off a pitbull once. It's not very hard, people just have to be more willing to fight a dog, because when it comes down to it, humans are stronger than dogs, and can hit them with sticks.
    Posted by: Tonya Location: Bellevue on Mar 26, 2008 at 09:14 PM
    "Pit Bulls" are dogs just like any other kind of dog. If it is raised the wrong way, then things like this happen. It makes NO difference where they live. Come on people, stop pointing fingers at each others neighborhoods.
    Posted by: `Pat' Location: Omaha on Mar 26, 2008 at 09:03 PM
    Animal lover Location Omaha: You astounded me. I mean, I am simply amazed that you made such a comment. Have you ever been mistreated by someone & it WASN"T your fault? Sometimes mean animals attack strangers when they get loose! Especially dogs who THINK! but don't know that you are just an elderly man passing by. Heck, I know dogs that bark! when I just walk by on the sidewalk! Have you ever had a dog try & sneak up on you from behind? Mean people harbor mean vicious animals. People say-"Sic them" or "GET them". Some dogs are just plain NOT FRIENDLY. Have you ever been bitten? You really have me wondering what kind of a sheltered life you may have led. Have you ever had to hold a dog BACK from biting someone? A person has to be careful if he or she takes a bowl of food away from a dog. Dogs can be overly-protective & defensive with strangers. Mailmen have to watch out for them all the time. We live in a city that sometimes is a concrete jungle. Man can be the worst predator. BEWARE!
    Posted by: Gary Location: Omaha on Mar 26, 2008 at 09:01 PM
    I love it when someone says my pit bull was so gentle then it bit my kids face off. Might as well have a rattlesnake. People that own pitt bulls are wimps, drug dealers or just plain stupid. The breed needs to be banned in Nebraska.
    Posted by: David Location: council bluffs on Mar 26, 2008 at 08:58 PM
    To say "all pitbulls attack for no reason" is ridiculous. As the case of the group saving many of Vicks dogs have shown, there are some pitbulls that are incredibly sweet and loving. The owners need to be held accountable- just as a parent would be held accountable. In world war 2- pitbulls were had just like labs are today- and i dont remember hearing about this rash of bitings then- so maybe if people didnt make their dogs mean to hide their drugs- we wouldnt have such a problem. Poodles bite as well - so lets kill all of them as well. By the time we are done- we will all be able to own cats- until of course someone gets scratched.
    Posted by: Chris Location: LV on Mar 26, 2008 at 08:47 PM
    Animal Lover, are you serious? Or did you just write that to provoke us? Do you know what they call a pit bull that does not attack for no reason? Dead!
    Posted by: Bill Location: Omaha on Mar 26, 2008 at 08:47 PM
    A good pitbull is a dead pitbull. They have no purpose other than dog fighting and people eating!!!!!!
    Posted by: E on Mar 26, 2008 at 08:41 PM
    I hope he goes after the obviously careless owners of the dogs....
    Posted by: Al Location: papillion on Mar 26, 2008 at 08:36 PM
    To the animal lover. This man is 76 years old. I seriously doubt he was "provoking" these dogs. His "provocation" was probably that he was walking down the street. Why were'nt these dogs confined, or leashed. They should never have been able to attack this poor man. This is definitly one breed of dog that should be banned. Animal lovers can love cocker spaniels and labs just as much.
    Posted by: Sandy Location: North Omaha on Mar 26, 2008 at 08:35 PM
    There are so many pitbulls in north Omaha and 90% of them are being bred to produce more of these dogs. We need to have a spay-neuter law in this city for pitbulls, or we will see many more headlines like this one.
    Posted by: Loves Dogs Location: Bellevue on Mar 26, 2008 at 08:35 PM
    I disagree with animal lover. Pits are working dogs and if these dogs are on the loose they are not being cared for properly, therefore most likely were looking for food.
    Posted by: justin Location: omaha on Mar 26, 2008 at 08:35 PM
    animal lover, I love animals, but sometimes, they do attack, because they have been bred/raised/trained to do just that. I was walking my 1 year old black lab, at the time it was 60 pounds, in my neighborhood when a boxer came bolting out of a backyard, and instantly attacked my dog. We didn't provoke it, we were simply walking on the sidewalk. It was a lot of unpleasant work to seperate these two dogs, and had was tempted to beat the crap out of the boxer...but I didn't. Dogs can attack without warning, it's rare, but it does happen.
    Posted by: BiilyBob Location: Omaha on Mar 26, 2008 at 08:21 PM
    Animal Lover : If you had any knowledge, it would be wise to believe that the 76yr old man highly unlikely prevoked the dogs. Get a life.
    Posted by: Chris Location: LV on Mar 26, 2008 at 08:16 PM
    Guns don't kill people. Dogs do.
    Posted by: Amazed Location: N.O on Mar 26, 2008 at 08:13 PM
    Just like any other animal, there was a reason for their attack. Of course, the media will glorify the fact that it was two "prowling" pits that violently attacked some elderly guy as he cautiously trotted down a peaceful street. Wait, no they wont. I forgot this happened in North O. It'll turn out the dogs are thugs or gang members and this was an assigned hit. I can do nothing but laugh at the assumptions made these days. All carnivores are natural predators. If the above pic is one of the dogs, it appears a bit on the slim side for a Pit. Maybe they were abandoned and hungry. Or maybe he walked through their yard and they felt threatened. Either way, I pray for Mr. Hewitt's speedy recovery as well as the owners of those canines. They've lost a part of their "family" due to this event.
    Posted by: Amy Location: Omaha on Mar 26, 2008 at 07:56 PM
    Animal Lover: I'm sure he didn't do anything to provoke them. Not all dogs are kind and do attack when provoked. If they saw me, they'd sense fear and that might provoke them. You can be an "animal lover" but don't be so naive.
    Posted by: Mike Location: Iowa on Mar 26, 2008 at 07:48 PM
    What do you mean Animal Lover? I am confident that this gentleman did not provoke the dogs.. I am an animal lover to but this is an aggressive breed that needs to be eliminated. I am glad that OPD had to kill one of the dogs.. they should all be killed. when you drive in North O, every young punk has one of these stupid dogs and they are standing around. lets put a few in your house and see if they attack you or your family sometime.\
    Posted by: annonymous on Mar 26, 2008 at 07:36 PM
    Why is it that people on the North side of Omaha feel they need to have Pit Bulls? I know there are more in other areas, but you always hear about them in the same neighborhoods out North.
    Posted by: Anonymous Location: Council Bluffs on Mar 26, 2008 at 07:34 PM
    this is to animal lover. he didnt have to do anything for the dogs to attack him. not all dogs are provoked to be attacked. the owners should be held responsible for the actions of the dogs not the victim.
    Posted by: How Stupid R U Location: Omaha on Mar 26, 2008 at 07:17 PM
    This is not a breed issue it is an owner issue. These can be wonderful and very loving dogs to own. How they are raised begets how they will behave, just as with any other dog!
    Posted by: Lynn Location: OmahaNE on Mar 26, 2008 at 07:09 PM
    A ban on pit bulls would work about as well as the "war on drugs"... While there are many people who are deserving of owning a pit bull, there are many that arent! -those are the people who are NOT going to spay or neuter, take a class or cease to breed...those are also the people who are criminals!! Pit bulls are just a fashion accesory to them, they dont care what their dogs do to someone else. The OWNER is at fault for letting their dog(s) run and become aggressive... Banning pit bulls will only make people want them more. Its a viscous circle and the sadly the dogs are the real victims..
    Posted by: Anonymous on Mar 26, 2008 at 07:05 PM
    Hey Animal Lover: He was a 76 year old man, and yes, they DO attack for no reason if they are raised that way.
    Posted by: to animal lover on Mar 26, 2008 at 07:04 PM
    All animals are unpredictable. Dogs don't need to be provoked to attack - especially if they are "wild dogs". I own two dogs myself, and I did "dog training and socialization" with both of them. I think anyone who owns dogs should have to do this.
    Posted by: don Location: omaha on Mar 26, 2008 at 07:02 PM
    The ordinance in CB has worked miracles. The naysayers were wrong. Pit bull attacks are nonexistent. Three years after enactment of ban. Hmmm. C'mon Omaha. Get with it. http://www.dogsbite.org
    Posted by: Chris Location: Omaha on Mar 26, 2008 at 07:00 PM
    Animal Lover, I am amazed at your lack of uniformed statement. These animals most certainly DO attack unprovoked! There are plenty of cases documented on video showing just how dangerous these dogs can be. Any animal, wild or domestic, is capeable of unprovoked attack. Some breeds are just predisposed to it more than others.
    Posted by: Amanda Location: Iowa on Mar 26, 2008 at 06:58 PM
    The black dog looks mixed, but the white dog looks purebred and the white dog was showing it's teeth and looking vicious, but my question is, what provoked these dogs to attack? I'm not saying the elderly man did anything but I have a staffordshire terrier(in the same family as a pit bull) and she's is the sweetest thing ever, she loves people, so for her to ever attack anyone, I'll be shocked. I'm sick of peopple, esp. the media, saying 'pit bull' about every dog attacking someone. Yes the white dog looked like a real pit, but the black looked mixed and possibly not a pit at all, I wish people would get off the 'pit bull' bandwagon, there great dogs, trust me, I have one. Anonymous, your posts are not wanted if you call these dogs 'useless', your comments are useless, you obviously no NOTHING about Pit Bulls, look up facts and history about this breed, they are family dogs and are loyal, its the people that make these, or any dog for that matter...mean.
    Posted by: don Location: omaha on Mar 26, 2008 at 06:58 PM
    http://www.dogsbite.org 35 people died from dog attacks 2007 USA 70 % pit bulls or american bulldogs enough said.
    Posted by: na Location: Omaha on Mar 26, 2008 at 06:57 PM
    Pitbulls don't attack for no reason??? That's like saying a lion doesn't attack for no reason. Sure they do, it's in their blood.
    Posted by: Z Location: 402 on Mar 26, 2008 at 06:53 PM
    Oh man....nothing like people on wowt blaming animals for the owner's wrong doings. Heres the thing about pitbulls. Most (not all) but most people get them to look tough. If you neglect a dog and raise it somewhere around violence and abuse it, of course it is going to be mean. I myself am a runner and was once attacked by a black lab late at night. People decide to buy these dogs so they can "bulk them up" and make them look mean. Bad dogs are not born, they're made.
    Posted by: Jeff Location: Omaha on Mar 26, 2008 at 06:47 PM
    You do not have to do anything to provoke these dogs...I work for a local utility company and just today we had one of these worthless dogs charge us for no reason at all...unfortunately the Human Society could not catch it and put it down like they all should be...
    Posted by: mia Location: iowa on Mar 26, 2008 at 06:40 PM
    When are they ever going to get the pit bull problem under control.
    Posted by: Animal Lover Location: Omaha on Mar 26, 2008 at 06:33 PM
    What did he do to provoke the Dogs? They do not attack for no reason.
    Posted by: John Location: Omaha on Mar 26, 2008 at 06:22 PM
    I suppose that a ban on pitbulls is just too much to hope for. How about pitbull owners be required to attend a special training and socialization course? How about pitbull owners who are not licensed breeders be required to spay and neuter their dogs? It doesn't seem too much to ask from people who feel the need to own an animal that is bred to kill. Wouldn't we have much higher expectations from the handlers of other dangerous animals? For that matters all dog owners should train and socialize their dogs. And, if a person is not a professional breeder they should have their dogs fixed. There's enough homeless animals at the animal shelter.
    Posted by: mTm Location: West O. on Mar 26, 2008 at 06:11 PM
    I do work in North Omaha and this could happen on about every block and every street.
    Posted by: Anonymous on Mar 26, 2008 at 05:29 PM
    Just another reason to ban this useless breed of dog.
    Desktop Weather
  • Video: Hour-by-Hour Forecast Updates
    		•