Stadium Plan Unveiled
Rosenblatt renovation off the table
Posted: 10:15 AM Feb 27, 2008
 Last Updated: 2:29 PM Feb 28, 2008
 Email Address: sixonline@wowt.com
414 comments Poll
A | A | A

Omaha has formally unveiled a plan for a new baseball stadium to be built in the Qwest Center parking log. It's a $128 million venue. Rosenblatt renovation is no longer being considered.

 
Do You Favor or Oppose the Downtown Stadium Proposal?
Favor
Oppose
 

Jack Diesing, with CWS Inc. says, "Certainly Rosenblatt Stadium was a good option but the downtown stadium was the best option."

There had been concerns about cooperation from MECA, the board that oversees Qwest Center operations. Chairman David Sokol says MECA and the City of Omaha have reached a memorandum agreement. That means they can begin "good faith" negotiations without the threat of a lawsuit.

Sokol says he wants to see the College World Series stay in Omaha, but must also consider what is in the best interest for the Qwest Center and it's customers.

Omaha Mayor Mike Fahey and his stadium committee made their plans for a new stadium public Wednesday afternoon.

Diesing said, "In baseball terms, it's time to step up to the plate and swing for the fences."

The stadium committee began looking at all the options in October 2007 and Tuesday presented its findings to the NCAA in Indianapolis. The committee chose parking lots C and E at the Qwest center as the site for a new downtown stadium and said Wednesday they are moving forward with this option and Rosenblatt Stadium is not longer a viable alternative.

In addition to renovating Rosenblatt Stadium, the committee considered eight sites in the downtown area during its evaluations. The committee's objectives were to "recommend the best alternative to serve CWS within available funds" that was "the best interest for all of Omaha."

Each site was scored in several categories and the site with the highest score was parking lots C and E.

The eight sites considered were:

  • Site AA: 14th to 17th Streets from Cuming to Webster
  • Site BB: 14th to 17th Streets from Webster to Cass
  • Site CC: Qwest Center Parking Lots C and E
  • Site DD: Qwest Center Parking Lot D
  • Site EE: Union Pacific, North of Abbott Drive
  • Site FF: Civic Auditorium
  • Site GG: Pinnacle Foods, North of Capitol Avenue
  • Site HH: Riverfront OPPD and Union Pacific Property

    Funding issues were also considered by the committee. The cost of a new stadium is estimated at $127.84 million while the cost of renovating Rosenblatt Stadium is estimated at $72.57 million. The debt still owed on Rosenblatt, $11.95 million, must also be added to each of these costs bringing the final cost totals to $139.79 million and $84.52 million, respectively.

    Money to pay for the new stadium would come from private donations, public money and stadium revenue sources. The committee estimates $42.95 million could be raised in private money for the new stadium; $37.60 million would come from stadium revenue sources, including premium seating, naming rights, parking revenue and a seat tax and the remaining $59.24 million would come from public funding. This money would be raised by a proposed 1% increase in the hotel/motel tax, a $2.00 increase in the city's rental car fee and Keno funds.

    Ken Stinson, chairman of the Stadium Oversight Committee, said the downtown proposal will benefit the target area for site development and the Rosenblatt neighborhood.

    Stinson said as the North Downtown continues to grow, "a new stadium will definitely be a catalyst to that development."

    As for moving the city's baseball venue north, Stinson said, "A new stadium will create a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity for the Henry Doorly Zoo."

    The stadium committee placed its proposal on a Web site that went online as the Wednesday news conference was taking place. Click here to view the site.

    Omaha Mayor Mike Fahey said at the Wednesday afternoon news conference that this was the day he has been waiting for.

    He said, "I am confident that this proposal will allow Omaha to serve as the host of the College World Series for many, many years to come."

    Public Forum Discussions
    South Omaha
    March 6, 2008
    7 p.m. to 9 p.m.
    Laritzen Gardens Great Hall

    North Omaha
    March 8, 2008
    10 a.m. to Noon
    Omaha North High School
    4410 N. 36th St.
    Gymnasium

    Midtown Omaha
    March 10, 2008
    7 p.m. to 9 p.m.
    Westside High School
    8701 Pacific St.
    Auditorium

    		•
    More Stories
    Family Mourns Loss Of Loved One

    Man Critically Wounded by Gunfire in South Omaha

    Fire at Omaha Apartment Complex Blamed on Electrical Problem

    Ralston Celebrates Independence Day

    		 Holiday Weekend Fireworks Displays

    Man Drives Himself to Hospital after Shooting

    Weather Cooperates For Fireworks Show

    Fireworks Injury Victim Warns Others
    Post Your Comments
    First Name:
    Location:
    Enter Comments: characters left
    Email (optional):
    By posting this comment I have read and agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy:
    You must agree to the Terms of Service to continue.
    Read Comments
    Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
    Posted by: Nathan on Mar 26, 2008 at 08:28 AM
    Did any of you even read this article? People keep complaining about a tax increase. the pricetag on the new stadium is around $140 million but about $43 million is coming from private donors, which has no effect on you, and $38 million will come from the stadium itself, ie premium seating, naming rights, parking revenue and a seat tax. So the total cost that would come from “taxing the people of omaha” is around $60 million, and this amount is only coming from a 1% increase in hotel tax and a $2 increase on rental car tax. So the CWS would bring even more money into the Omaha economy than it already does. Renovating the South O Blatt would cost around $73 million but we still have $12 million in debt on it. So “build new stadium ($60) million. keep and fix rosenblatt ($85) million. humm. can you figure which is a smarter decision, guess not.”
    Posted by: Bobbi on Mar 18, 2008 at 09:45 AM
    Ok if we re build rosenblatt will it still be called rosenblatt stadium and why are you making people that don't want to rebuild why are you highering there taxes and prices of everyday needs? this is stupid
    Posted by: Terry on Mar 3, 2008 at 06:25 PM
    That is true Fahey isn't honest. He talks out of the side of his mouth. He knows the real reason for the new stadium. It's so he and the rest of his buddies can get riches. Just wait and see who starts making the money. The first will be last someday.
    Posted by: To Jerry on Mar 3, 2008 at 03:49 PM
    I feel your pain but there is relief. First GO TO THE MEETINGS and tell the mayor you are concerned. Ask him, "Warren Buffet has declared that we are in a recession. Can you define a 9-11 event and does the looming recession qualify". If you are not satisfied by his response, www.recall-fahey.com Although it won't eliminate the possiblity of a TAX increase, the NCAA did offer to extend the current contract, which would have put both the new stadium and Rosenblatt groups on hold for awhile.
    Posted by: Terry on Mar 3, 2008 at 03:47 PM
    We'll sure they want the down town stadium. They need to have the ground at Rosenblatt. So they can build the water works park and another Motel. Sounds like a winner to me. They don't intend to give it to the zoo for expansion.
    Posted by: Anonymous on Mar 3, 2008 at 12:16 PM
    Fahey is not an honest man.
    Posted by: Jerry on Mar 3, 2008 at 12:07 PM
    I am scared for Omaha. We are in this SPEND mode, that we can not afford. A Stadium, Replace a Sewer System, the original Rosenblat remodel, Pensions for our late Police and Fire Department heads, Man hole cover "Updates", A Walking Bridge to nowhere, We are still paying for the Civic Auditorium and now the Quest, witch lead to the Omaha citizens owning a HOTEL? Has anyone paid any attention to the amounts of money we are saddling our children with? How does the College World Series benifit the average Omaha Tax payer? All of the money generated goes to the Hotel, Bar, Restaraunt, and Car rental companies. Tax dollars for sales will be far more than eaten up by this new stadium Purchase, so the benifits are gone. Let the CWS die gracefully from Omaha. It was fun when we had IT and Level Heads about us, but now it is out of control, and not worth the indebtedness it is about to cause.
    Posted by: To Randy on Mar 2, 2008 at 05:41 PM
    News FLASH! There are ongoing grandjury investigations into the financing involving ARCO arena in Sacramento in 2006, similiar to this issue.
    Posted by: Valerie on Mar 2, 2008 at 03:52 PM
    Cancelling my World Herald subscription. The paper as I observed is pushing hard to support the mayor and giving very little to the taxpayers options. Fahey was very sneeky doing all of the dealings and then coming to the public and claiming we have to do this in order to save CWS. CWS has never said that they are leaving that I'm aware of. Is he working for the public or himself and/or buddies that are going to profit with this deal? Families are struggling, we don't need another ball park or higher taxes.
    Posted by: Marc on Mar 2, 2008 at 07:08 AM
    Yep a new stadium would be great, but NOT on MY dime!.Those of you morons that favor this Money Pit, need to pull your heads out of the sand, and get a grip!..It's YOUR taxes that will be paying for this Lemon!. Neither the NCAA nor the CWS have ever requested a NEW place to play. "The Johnny" can be expanded much cheaper and still maintain it's nostalgia! King Fahey, needs to disappear before he drives this city into the ground! This is just another in a long string of examples where King Fahey presses this city into something that we DO NOT need, and will cost a bundle of money in the future to maintain! Bottom line.. Anyone remember AKSARBEN!?!? FAHEY HAS TO GO!
    Posted by: Puzzled on Mar 2, 2008 at 12:06 AM
    I called the CWS of Omaha numerous times over the course of the new stadium debate to ask why they were forcing us to tear down a landmark to go downtown. I was told that THIS HAS ALWAYS BEEN FAHEY'S IDEA NOT THE CWS OF OMAHA. So how does Fahey translate this into a fear tactic to elicite a psychological response that if we do not do this now the NCAA will take the CWS out of here. Could it be the other way around the pressure is our mayor and the special interests which are losing money at this time on ventures. Mr. Fahey I went to college and I am educated but I am not wealthy enough to save all of those who may have made questionable decisions in todays economy. With the stock market in panic and people again fearing lost pensions and social security scheduled to run out in 2040. How can we count on things being better while this loan is paid off by our childrens children if they stay? Economics I think has been left out of the equation. Rosenblatt is the better choice.
    Posted by: NEW STADIUM on Mar 2, 2008 at 12:06 AM
    Greg, why don't you run to for office you seem to think you know how everyone wants their tax dollars spent, other than that you really don't have any control. Omaha looks like a bunch of loosers for wanting to recall the mayor for what improving the city. Messed up in my book!
    Posted by: Greg on Mar 1, 2008 at 06:48 PM
    When is the Mayor going to get the "Peoples" 'recommendation' on how 'they . . . "the People"' would like for their tax dollars to be spent for what projects they choose for their city to be engaged with? So far already 53.7% of respondents are already in oppostion to this lop-sided article. This should be a wake up call!
    Posted by: To Mike and others on Mar 1, 2008 at 09:37 AM
    Do you HONESTLY think the NCAA wants it to stay at the Blatt? NOOOOOO, READ BETWEEN THE LINES! Geez, OPEN UR EYES FOLKS. CWS = GONE if no new stadium, THAT'S A FACT.
    Posted by: ... on Mar 1, 2008 at 03:13 AM
    Everytime I think of how it must of went to get all of this ready by the committee to buffalo us the tax payers. How hard was it to manipulate Rosenblatt a wash statistically? Padding the costs for the old to prove useless & definitely not an option for the NCAA. Taking the footprint of the new stadium to drawings of all over downtown so desparate for it to fit there for the agenda. Hiding the facts from us about EPA covenants on usage. All of the phone calls to the mayor useless, either they know nothing or tell you he is an elected official which I elected and must let him do as he sees best for the city. Mayor Fahey & committee are partners with the NCAA not the citizens. Best of all no information will be given about anything especially why the taxes will raise for the Qwest in 2013 until the city has a signed long term contract with their partner the NCAA whom wanted it this way. So many secrets, no trust, no compassion and definitely no hometown feel at the mayor's office.
    Posted by: Michael on Mar 1, 2008 at 02:37 AM
    To Randy; Been there since '06? Didn't see the same fiasco we are dealing with now taking place then? It's all on the web and if that is your sole argument a bad comparison as well. It won't work here.
    Posted by: RE: Ric from another Iowa tourist on Mar 1, 2008 at 02:10 AM
    I will not be attending the downtown stadium, I have always parked for free at Rosenblatt.
    Posted by: 2Randy on Mar 1, 2008 at 02:05 AM
    You might check the net, the same thing is happening there August of 2006. The ARCO TO OLD TO REMODEL. The tax payers upset and feeling like they are being pushed into something they do not want. Thanks for the tip to research for you.
    Posted by: TO Randy @ 8:17PM on Mar 1, 2008 at 01:38 AM
    Sir; Multiple issues with your comparisons, they didn't put Arco in an EPA SuperFund site or in parking lots serving another local venue. Another issue with the comparison is that you are comparing apples to oranges, Omaha is definitely no Sacramento. We are not a BIG city. Have you checked on the recent 2006 issues that plagued Sacramento taxpayers regarding Arco? Available on the net and interesting reading, almost a CLONE of this very SAME situation... If those articles are correct, it proves our point and this will NOT work for Omaha. Nice try...
    Posted by: Mike on Feb 29, 2008 at 11:47 PM
    RUN FOR OFFICE; Yes, it is a personal agenda, the Mayor's, not ours. Keep the CWS here for twenty years? We can EASILY do that without a new stadium plan. According to the NCAA, they are open to the idea of remaining at the 'Blatt for any reasonable term of contract but were not given any plan or the opportunity from THE COMMITTEE. Must of been that agenda thing again or lack of 'compromise' that prevented it. We do support our leaders, when we trust them and when they make good choices, this descision is definitely not. Yepper, I will be at the SAVE ROSENBLATT rally tomorrow. Do you really want to know why? Because the mayor had the opportunity to prevent this whole thing if he would have accepted the generous offer from the NCAA to sign a shorter term deal at the 'Blatt while we come up with a REAL plan that has what this one is missing, which is community trust in their local goverment and rock solid financial support that doesn't leave so much risk for the lowly taxpayer.
    Posted by: TO Moving-ahead on Feb 29, 2008 at 11:41 PM
    SCARED OF EVERYTHING sounds a little paranoid to me as a statement about the people who go back to as in a lot of cases at least three or four generations. HERE LONG? THINK the area with the World Class Zoo and Gardens are decrepit. Have you ever been to a game, zoo or gardens? Daub brought the Qwest to reality to be jeporadized by people like you. The original concept that finally sold the people was the street cars coming up 10th connecting the existing successful venues to a new venue thus maximizing parking issues then for Rosenblatt. The clean up cost for the Qwest more than expected & soil was allowed to be stored on site. Covenants placed and further defined in OCT 2007 prohibiting use as a day care, preschool, playground, athletic field, picnic ground, dormitory, or nursing home. To help you understand that means ball fields are considered to be an athletic field. This WILL BE MORE MONEY if at all changeable. Does this not cover the planned usage for LOTS C & E.
    Posted by: To Moving-ahead on Feb 29, 2008 at 10:18 PM
    Are you just trying to infuriate the TAXPAYERS of this fair city? Even the folks that do agree with you know that comments like "Hillbillies" & "narrow minded" will not help you sway anyone to recognize any valid points you may have. Keep this up and you will lose any support you might have gained. Useful facts and comments will aid you in your goal. And I am for growth in this city, but not at the loss of my civic voice or the identity of this fantastic community. We are not scared of any change as you indicate, cautious maybe when we suspect that we are being railroaded but that is the human condition. And it IS our money...
    Posted by: 1 of 30 EDUCATED CANIDATES on Feb 29, 2008 at 09:24 PM
    RUN FOR OFFICE; Own the CWS? Make descisions for the NCAA? WOW! Really, if it was that easy, this discussion would be moot. Thanks for being so empowering though. Why are YOU pushing specifically for tne downtown plan? Compromise isn't a part of your vocabulary? When a major project that has been handled as badly as this (and the Mayor even admits it) with such secrecy and on-the-sly politics, this is really the best proposal they could come up with? I don't think so. The old line, "That which we call a Rose, by any other name would smell just as sweet" comes to mind only with substitutions to "Rose" and "sweet" being "pile of rot" and "Bad". And the ONLY option available? Well there's that C word again, but that's not allowed. Hmmm... Sounds like you aren't about democracy since it is our right to have checks and balances to prevent leaders from making serious mistakes, be it in ignorance or on purpose. It's called RECALL proceedings, would you prefer that to the C word?
    Posted by: Randy on Feb 29, 2008 at 08:17 PM
    I lived in Sacramento CA in the 1980's when a proposal was offered to build an arena for the NBA's Sacramento Kings that was needed to keep them in town. Arco arena was built at a cost of almost $100 million (this was in the 1980's). The same funding proposals were used there as is proposed here in Omaha for the baseball stadium. Private funding, naming rights, and a 1% hotel tax hike all were used to fund for the new arena without raising local taxes. It worked in Sacramento. They still have the Kings. It will work in Omaha too.
    Posted by: Dick Tater on Feb 29, 2008 at 05:46 PM
    I hope there will be a large turnout sat. at the Blatt to show our support. For all who think the Blatt is too old maybe we should tear down the OLD MARKET.
    Posted by: To J on Feb 29, 2008 at 05:25 PM
    J - Yes, typing SPECIFIC words can be interpeted as SHOUTING (and if you can actually READ a shout, sorry I deafened your eyes), but mostly it is used to EMPHASIZE points in my well developed argument (can't use BOLD or ITALICs here). If 'less than half' is your actual age, you MUST be around 12, which explains why you just can't seem to grasp what others (read adults who aren't SHOUTING) have been telling you, quit being so emotional about the new stadium that you can't present any useful facts or opinions. If you what to influence anyone, you're gonna have to do better than try and pick on me... Good luck!
    Posted by: Ric on Feb 29, 2008 at 04:03 PM
    HAHA! Tourist from Iowa.... it sounds like it will be to expensive to come to omaha now?????? If you get a hotel it will be one dollar more... and nothing will be less conviniet than Rosenblatt! GO DOWNTOWN STADIUM!!!!
    Posted by: Logic on Feb 29, 2008 at 02:37 PM
    More taxes for whats left out? With little time to go should we go with the alternative that was a wash? Original plan for the existing stadium solution being the best fit because there truly never will be enough hotels downtown. This takes the entire METRO AREA of hotels, businesses still profit. Parking? Why not shuttles for the price of a bus fare to handle large crowds, family budgets would benefit? Fahey's committee plans about using existing parking structures to resolve the Qwest issues would still be viable? Most of all the tax payers would not be holding as big of a bag during such an UNCERTAIN economic time in this country. Long term contracts should not be the MAJOR issue!! It is about the game and the kids we so cherish who play. South Omaha Business Leaders were already planning amenities for the area. Quite beautiful area from a tourist perspective. Zoo & Gardens draw a crowd. I80 currently under expansion for the traffic. THE HISTORY MAY REUNITE THIS CITY!!!
    Posted by: s on Feb 29, 2008 at 02:16 PM
    I would be able to accept a new stadium easier if this multi-million dollar walking bridge wasn't being built.
    Posted by: laurie on Feb 29, 2008 at 01:52 PM
    Whether or not those of us against a new stadium support the CWS or not is a non-issue. ALL Omaha and Douglas County residents pay taxes, ALL of us are affected by the products and services that are falling by the wayside in favor of fal-der-al, and ALL of us deserve a voice in how our taxes are spent and how our city government operates. I can't wait for Fahey to either get recalled or lose in reelection...at this rate, I would vote for HILLARY CLINTON to be mayor of Omaha, no one on any ballot anywhere could screw this city up anymore than it is. By the way, since WHEN is the "Omaha skyline" a requisite for a stadium? That has got to be THE dumbest reason for putting the stadium downtown that I have heard TO DATE.
    Posted by: Moving-ahead on Feb 29, 2008 at 01:51 PM
    People in Omaha are scared of EVERYTHING! Casinos, Arenas, New Roads, fairy dust, Hotels etc etc.. Anytime something new that comes into the city the Hillbillies’ come out and say no, that'll bring more people into the city and possibly help Omaha grow.. We don’t want change keep it the way it is.. Face it! Omaha is on the rise whether people like or not.. I say continue growth and leave the narrow minded behind with Rosenblatt and the old decrepit way Omaha use to look. Let's go!
    Posted by: Badger on Feb 29, 2008 at 12:51 PM
    Left the MAC last night (Great Foo concert) and it took me 45 minutes to get out of the lot and an hour to get to the interstate. Parking is a major issue. The same holds true for Qwest center. I simply do not understand why anyone would consider taking away two large parking areas when things aren't great now. I could care less where/if CWS is. Build or renovate - whatever. But do so with parking in mind.
    Posted by: Business Minded on Feb 29, 2008 at 12:26 PM
    Will this decision drive down property values of the homes sold with Rosenblatt as the anchor that brought the improvements to this area? If property values fall because of this and the lack of appropriate planning for sewer seperation will this not further hurt the property tax receipts that are needed for the Qwest in 2013? Finally do our current leaders pay attention to the world economy trends in the stock market with the possibility of small banks failing the world stock market took a tumble last night?
    Posted by: TO J on Feb 29, 2008 at 12:17 PM
    What the drunk guy is not invited especially over weight in shorts? I wonder how Arkansas fans feel about being called Back Woods. What is wrong with the majority of this population that we are called Back Woods?
    Posted by: 4Casinos on Feb 29, 2008 at 12:13 PM
    Did you forget the NCAA does not want casinos next to or anywhere near their venue? This makes CB an unlikely venue for the event for sure. So you must be a gambler...
    Posted by: Response to Run for Office on Feb 29, 2008 at 12:10 PM
    I thought running for office took possible a million dollars or more, it is too bad all of the educated are smart enough not to waste their money to be shot down by wealthy old boy money. We need a box on the ballots in this country that gives the option of NONE OF THE ABOVE this may bring out all of the voters in this country. Besides giving a true realistic message to our leaders, WE ARE NOT HAPPY WITH THE DECISIONS ARE LEADERS MAKE. Maybe we should call and suggest laws in the future that would prevent such a hostile take over of this local economy for short sighted agendas jeporadizing the successfullness and world known venue in just five years of the Qwest the real cornerstone of this area.
    Posted by: For anonymous on Feb 29, 2008 at 12:02 PM
    Sokol and others like the NCAA have said all along that Rosenblatt plan would be accepted. Or do you not remember that Fahey Commission only took one plan and was met with more for him to do before they consider signing on. A broad based community concensus and a solid financial plan to completion of this long term contract Faheyville says we need or else. THIS ABSOLUTELY WAS NEVER THE CASE. THIS IS ABOUT DEVELOPING AN AREA NORTH OF DOWNTOWN LEAVING THE RESIDENTS IN CLOSE PROXIMITY WITH ABSOLUTELY NO PLAN TO KEEP SEWAGE OUT OF THE HOMES AND OFF THERE PROPERTY, SEWAGE THAT JEPORADIZES THE HEALTH OF ALL THOSE EFFECTED. BUT THIS CONTINUES TO FALL ON DEAF EARS. At least the current site of Rosenblatt, the homes here are high enough off the river it does not threaten our property. I am someone who cares about hardship to others. Again tunnel visioned on just the downtown development which is having trouble filling all of the condos due to a weakened economy.
    Posted by: Curious on Feb 29, 2008 at 11:34 AM
    If the mayor can compromise with MECCA to NEGOTIATE for the right to acquire the parking lots, can it be possible he MIGHT consider a compromise with the TAXPAYERS of this fair city as well? It probably is just wishful thinking at this point, but who knows...
    Posted by: harry swartzfeger on Feb 29, 2008 at 11:32 AM
    What is rong with the Blatt? it has worked for fifty years. Add more seating to the Blatt. Come on Fehey were is your brain? We are over taxed now. Maybe Kansas City or Oklahoma City would be the best bet. You can't keep it here forever. What would happen if the C.W.S pulled out of here? Royals don't get evought fans nor does Creighton.
    Posted by: 2CWS fan on Feb 29, 2008 at 10:59 AM
    You want bars close by to a college event this was the problem to begin with beer tents. College games are not allowed to serve alcohol, NCAA is very protective of these kids. I have been to a game with this traffic many times and it has always been far less than an hour to get to I-80. Is alcohol availibility the driving force here with Mayor Fahey having interest in the Mattress Factory which will be next door?
    Posted by: To J @ 1:08AM on Feb 29, 2008 at 10:56 AM
    Sir; I was born in KC and visit there often for business. Great Place!! But not for the CWS because of it's size. They are looking for that DOWN HOME feeling and hearty WELCOME they get from the citizens of this fair city, not a place to stick 100,000 people...
    Posted by: To J in Kansas City on Feb 29, 2008 at 10:52 AM
    Are you one of the mayor's hometown friends? You have obviously not been to Omaha lately or did you not hear about the annexations out west taking Omaha out to almost 220th ST against the will of the people. The plans for growth are huge but you see us as LITTLE OMAHA forgetting that the Qwest Center is in the TOP 20 TICKET SALES MARKET IN THE WORLD WHICH IS AN AMAZING FEAT, But you wish us to jeporadize this by dwarfing it with a SEASONALLY USED STADIUM to replace a perfectly WORLD CLASS EVENT like the historical excitement of finding something preserved as grand as this. Sometimes with people the soil is sacred, but thats right we are not supposed to know there is a EPA convenant preventing this use, not in the plan and carefully left out to skew the selection saying it was a wash only $200,000 with a multi million dollar infrastructure to build not included in the plan. The NCAA wants a COMPLETE PLAN TO COMPLETION FOR A MULTI YEAR COMMITMENT, not a vaguely presented agenda.
    Posted by: To Tim on Feb 29, 2008 at 10:43 AM
    Parking at Rosenblatt was the only problem but at least they had a lot of free public parking in surrounding neighborhood streets. You must of been one of those people talking a walk say through Spring Lake Golf Course or Park, no homeless there. Or did you park in a lot close by charging for parking in the private yards, yes needing to charge something in order to repair any damage to their property but willing to do so for the love of the event. How can anyone say that the parking fees in this one event is the only thing this area is holding onto? Will all of this downtown parking have neighbors watching out for their cars? Not likely!!!
    Posted by: TO GET OVER IT on Feb 29, 2008 at 10:41 AM
    I did read the proposal and it is VERY possible that the TAXPAYERS will end up eating this, just like the $300 MILLION from the Qwest loan that will be raising OUR taxes in 2013 (Your City Council Rep WILL verify that info for you just so you know WE DON'T MAKE THIS STUFF UP). And BTW, houses sitting empty for 11 months? Think the TAXPAYERS aren't CLEVER enough? Omaha worried over NATIONAL IMAGE? It is quite apparent WHO is reading... FICTION that is... Better get back to your book, you might miss something important... Like REALITY...
    Posted by: RE: To Run for Office on Feb 29, 2008 at 10:40 AM
    Reading some of the comments here, there are about 30 EDUCATED candidates. Rather than screaming and yelling without KNOWING an ounce of the details, do something constructive, offer a plan that would mean the CWS wouldn't have to be dislaced for a year (that would happen if they did the Rosenblatt renovation). Come up with a plan that will be half funded by private donations, NOT happening with the Rosenblatt. Come up with a plan that the city wouldn't have to fork over 20 mill for the land. Instead, you just yell and scream, acting like the facts aren't there. The Qwest lot is the ONLY option to keep the CWS here for 20 years. If they do any other "compromise" than we lose it. Plus, the people DON'T OWN THE CWS, so why should they make the decisions for the NCAA? They should SUPPORT their city, and do what they can to keep the CWS here, not push their own personal agenda.
    Posted by: To Get OVER it on Feb 29, 2008 at 10:36 AM
    You should base your knowledge on more than just this article or were you not paying attention to the press briefings with the powers that be. The comments are here because of the poll being done. The educated use a large body of information instead of a few lines in one article.
    Posted by: ... on Feb 29, 2008 at 10:33 AM
    What a mess!!! Just secret agendas no truth at the mayors office.
    Posted by: ? on Feb 29, 2008 at 10:31 AM
    I am not dumb or uneducated and have spent well over $40,000 to beautify our property because we are so close to such a grand event. You have to be educated to have this kind of money to invest not to mention the labor of love put into the work. Is there a plan to beautify the neighborhood dealing with raw sewage in walking distance to this stadium? I did not see that in the cost projections. When beer tents and parking were the main concerns about keeping Rosenblatt would it not be cheaper on all of us to just spend the originally proposed $26 million to finish this part of the plan instead of trying manufacture a hometown atmosphere in a No Do area of town. In the heart of a concrete jungle. This is all so sad that all of those who have supported this stadium for so many years are left in the dark, called dumb or uneducated unlike the mayors experts. Whom by the way thought two Creighton games were a good judge of traffic by the Qwest with no event at the Qwest on the days studied.
    Posted by: Anti-Progress on Feb 29, 2008 at 10:27 AM
    Recall Fahey the new stadium is a horrible idea!!!!
    Posted by: NCAA Supporter on Feb 29, 2008 at 10:23 AM
    Will the NCAA be fooled into believing that it will only be $140 million, what about soil cleanup and widening area interstate and streets, acquiring more parking after the complaints roll in during construction. Why do we want to dwarf a world class place such as the Qwest Center with a seasonally used stadium inconveniencing the majority of the people who are more likely to be at the Qwest, people who have never been lucky enough to get in on general admission tickets. Green spaces like the Rosenblatt area are much nicer to walk through,relax, talk with friends and hear local neighbors cheer on a fans team. Will people all leave their homes and go downtown to make our guests feel welcome even though they are not attending that particular session? This will be replaced with big buildings, interstate bridges and a park full of the latest homeless struggling because they are one of the many in the US to lose their homes due to uncontrolled preditorial loans.
    Posted by: Garry on Feb 29, 2008 at 09:43 AM
    Like Rosenblat was ever seriously considered as an option. Looking at the figures above and Rosenblat looks like a better deal. How much of the "estimated" private funds are promised, and how much is wishful thinking? The fact of the matter is, the mayor wants the statdium downtown because he thinks it will spark renovation. Hasn't happened in a single city yet - look at Chicago, new stadiums and arenas built in the bad part of town hasn't magically made it the good part of town. The people of Omaha are so against this largely because of the way it was handled. The Mayor stacked the deck on the committee, populating it with only his yes-men. Such a public decision was shrouded in secrecy. The mayor and committee refused to even hear public opinion. They refused to share details until after they made promises to the NCAA. What happens when we votes "no" to send a message about the secrecy? Is the NCAA going to think the mayor was dumb, or will they think Omaha doesn't them?
    Posted by: COST??? on Feb 29, 2008 at 09:33 AM
    www.epa.gov/correctiveaction/success/upo11-07.pdf this is the link to an official EPA document the Mayor, council & committee do not want us to know about. I checked yes they have all known since October 2007 that a covenant prevents so easily building an athletic field,& admit not in the cost projections. I wonder why Omaha does not remember less than 10 yrs ago in our community are the supporters this young. The contaminated soil was left on the property, to save money on the Qwest construction telling the citizens NO WORRIES,area will always be a parking lot. Just copy and paste the web address this will give you the pdf file, pg 2 bottom paragraph spells it out clearly. We as citizens are not to consider this in the $200,000 wash figure between staying at Rosenblatt, this will raise the cost of this project by many millions. Go to the meetings coming up ask the hard questions so we are not left with yet another surprise unaddressed for progress. BUYER BEWARE economy is WEAKENED
    Posted by: w on Feb 29, 2008 at 09:06 AM
    hahahahahahaha sure they will stop the tax in 16 years just like the government has stopped any other tax after its time.
    Posted by: The Truth on Feb 29, 2008 at 08:49 AM
    This is fantastic. Omaha is spending hundreds of millions for a 2 week event? Get real. Creighton wants a new stadium. Creighton gets a new stadium. You chumps are paying for it. End of story.
    Posted by: J on Feb 29, 2008 at 07:34 AM
    To J - Sorry, by the time this is settled, I will still be less than half your age. Not to mention, typing specific words in capital letters means you're shouting. Does yelling get you anywere? No... coming up with a well developed argument does, clearly something you missed.
    Posted by: Bill on Feb 29, 2008 at 05:04 AM
    My wife and I are tired of the treatment that the Mayor and his "Committee" has given the majority of the citizens of Omaha. We are not uneducated, but trying to face reality. We don't want anymore taxes. Don't believe for one second there won't be any. We have a budget we go by and our elected officials should show the same fiscal resonsibilty as well. Which has not been demonstrated in this whole fiasco. The NCAA does not run Omaha. We both work, own our home and are strained financially. We do have money set aside for our retirement and the way things are going in this town and state, maybe it is time to move to some place where we won't be taxed up to our necks. We plan to be at the Save Rosenblatt rally on Saturday. Yes, Mayor Fahey needs to be recalled, and this looks like the only way he will hear what the "uneducated" (no pun intended" citizens of Omaha are saying. We also urge that if your City Councilman votes for this waste of money, to recall that person as well
    Posted by: Don on Feb 29, 2008 at 03:19 AM
    For those that keep advising to read the proposal, I did it, and unfortunately, it leaves much to chance and speculation. There are no signed contracts, no signed promises of monetary support. It does not address all the issues brought up. For "Get OVER it". Follow your own advise.If you had the money to spend, you wouldn't enter into this venture. In fact, so far, nobody with the money has made any promises to actually do this. I could care less of the CWS leaves or stays. I also could care less of a new stadium will be built and where. I do care that Omaha is being driven into a debt with no fiscal way out. Anyone that supports this project, would be the ones that are uneducated. The ones in support simply want this in the same way that they want a new car, got to keep up with the neighbors. With that said, send it KC. It can sit by the race track that they can't even sell all the seats to.
    Posted by: To Jessica on Feb 29, 2008 at 02:35 AM
    What made you think ROSENBLATT wasn't a viable option with the NCAA?? Do you even watch the news?
    Posted by: Educated on Feb 29, 2008 at 02:30 AM
    It is sad that there are those referring out there as we the majority cannot be allowed a voice because we are uneducated and some include emotional. I am highly educated as well as my siblings and we as well as many are against not being allowed to be a democracy. This all feels like a political game with closed doors, secret donors, no vote allowed because you might not understand and vague so called projections based on a sound economy unless a catastrophe like 9/11 happens according to our mayor & EXPERTS. Why can our government not trust the voters? We are told the Fahey EXPERTS are in specialized fields. Did he really think all of the tax payers who work hard at educating themselves to achieve yet better economic stability might not want to lose their hard earned gains to fund what most never ever attend but many more have been to the Qwest more than once. I have been there at least a dozen times because of income earned. How can they be so arrogant if they what a broad concensus
    Posted by: r on Feb 29, 2008 at 01:53 AM
    Mayor Fahey stated that the cost between the stadiums was a wash $200,000, but the deciding factor was that the CWS and the Royals could not be displaced for the duration of construction. My question is has anyone thought of how much profit will be lost by the construction displacing yet more parking? An advertised low cost event could draw low crowds such as a home or garden show. This would not build on the market already built up for the Qwest not only of consumers but vendors & venues. Convenience is supposed to be the key factor to make a seasonal aethletic field downtown, what about the Qwest. Maybe a sign saying SORRY FOR THE INCONVENIENCE it will only be two years or so of extra walking for those who might have gotten one of those valued spots so close to the stadium when the weather is bad during a major revenue producing event. For those who have been to the Qwest it is not easy to get anywhere close to park at the stadium, this is why we walk in, usually rushing after work.
    Posted by: Truth on Feb 29, 2008 at 01:37 AM
    To Get OVER it - all of my statements were based on press coverage I have watched on this channel.
    Posted by: 4Truth on Feb 29, 2008 at 01:30 AM
    TO GET OVER IT; apparently YOU missed the SOKOL broadcast today where all of the outlined facts were stated. Seems you like reading books from your location, mostly fiction I assume...
    Posted by: J on Feb 29, 2008 at 01:08 AM
    Ok with that all said then, bring it here to Kansas City. Im sure this place attracts more people anyway than little omaha.
    Posted by: Tim on Feb 29, 2008 at 12:07 AM
    You people are screaming and hollering about the lack of parking with the new stadium. You make it sound like Rosenblatt Stadium was a dream come true in the parking department...HA!!!
    Posted by: Get OVER it on Feb 28, 2008 at 11:51 PM
    Again, this debate is being fed by uneducated people, who like to hear their own voice. You people need to READ the article. That means you "truth". Just because you say it doesnt make it true, when a group of people IN THE KNOW, and ACTUALLY invovled release the information, you look foolish when you come out saying things that are not true. All of you need to READ the proposal, and then dont make ridiculous claims that it will still fall on us. You guys are just making stuff up...for what? Some houses on 13th street that sit empty 11 months of the year? Or because you are not clever enough to get yourself down town in a quick fashion? Come on people.....you REALLY are not helping our national image here.
    Posted by: To RUN FOR OFFICE on Feb 28, 2008 at 10:32 PM
    Better idea! Let's ALL go down to the first TOWN HALL meeting and show just how UNEDUCATED we really are when we DO offer OPTIONS! As far as actually RUNNING FOR OFFICE, we DO NEED FRESH LEADERSHIP WITH A RESPONSIVE ATTITUDE FOR THE CITIZEN'S CONCERNS, got any REAL canidates in mind or just fishing?
    Posted by: Jean on Feb 28, 2008 at 10:23 PM
    We have been told it is about the community not the place by the NCAA, it is about a budget leading through to completion not vague assigned values based with little data supporting these values. There are a lot more people to Omaha than just downtown. This will not save fuel because we will still be in line if you have ever tried to get anywhere close to the Qwest during an event. The surrounding streets are so congested you have to go the long way to the airport especially if you are from out of town and more comfortable with an Interstate to travel there since most of us are not familiar with all of the changes to this area. I was stuck in dead ends and with one way streets leading me into the darker parts of town looking to find my way past concert traffic blocking the road to IN PLAY to pick up my husband from a business meeting. I was afraid as I drove around because of a recent rape behind this building. Finally there I could not park I feared walking from behind the building.
    Posted by: jack on Feb 28, 2008 at 09:42 PM
    Since when do we put people in office for there own personel visions.I thought we elect them for then people by the people. If the do not do the job for the people the should be jailed for breach of contract. not impeched.
    Posted by: <<< on Feb 28, 2008 at 09:32 PM
    Sokol has said this afternoon that the most important part of the new stadium is citizen support and the NCAA loves this community experience and would accept Rosenblatt.
    Posted by: Anonymous on Feb 28, 2008 at 09:29 PM
    if people only think of today and cry about 6 dollar parking THEN we will see the cws leave.
    Posted by: TaxPayer from on Feb 28, 2008 at 09:18 PM
    Mr. Mayor; Are YOU willing to talk NEW PLAN yet? Maybe even a COMPROMISE? Anywhere BUT DOWNTOWN appears to be the popular consensus at the moment so MAYBE (due to TIME constraints) you might even consider... dare I say it?... ROSENBLATT?! If the COST is TRUELY that much of a WASH (as you keep pointing out) it MIGHT be a good idea to LISTEN, even if you still disagree. We need a VOICE in this, as you were painfully made aware when you visited with the NCAA and we're WILLING to TALK. The BEST solution is to ask the NCAA to ALLOW you to reconsider their GENEROUS offer to extend the current contract while we work this out, TOGETHER! It's TIME we talked, what do you say?
    Posted by: Jessica on Feb 28, 2008 at 08:22 PM
    Wouldn't we rather lose the tradition of Rosenblatt than the tradition of the CWS all together? That should be everybody's biggest concern. We should be attatched to and fighting to keep the event...not the venue.
    Posted by: LC on Feb 28, 2008 at 06:28 PM
    I don't care if they build a new stadium, I just wish they would put it somewhere else. Anywhere other than the Qwest Center parking lots. They are already short on parking when there are big events.
    Posted by: Truth on Feb 28, 2008 at 06:19 PM
    MECA did not back down, Fahey did and Sokol was happy because it was a good decision to take litigation off of the table. Sokol also felt that the city had no legal hold on the parking lots. Sokol also stated this was not about power this was about his responsibility. He also said that the position of the MECA board is still no to lots C&E, the traffic study was based on two Creighton games not a concert, that improving traffic would be great but that alone does not address the concerns of the board. Rumor has that Fahey has the four votes in city council to force us to pay the bill. But the concensus of the public, the reality of the true cost of the project could keep all of this from happening at all. But I will watch to see who votes to ruin this city further with debt in a time that even President Bush, the stock market & major cooperations are all aware the economy weakening is the risk in spending without need.
    Posted by: To J on Feb 28, 2008 at 06:08 PM
    Get over it? Going to happen anyway? Oh REALLY!! Well without BROAD PUBLIC CONSENSUS (which we are NOWHERE near and the NCAA is very AWARE) = NO NCAA APRROVAL=NO STADIUM FUNDING=NO STADIUM and if Fahey keeps it up = NO CWS. Or maybe you weren't paying attention to the TWO requirements that Mr. Poppe required from Mr Fahey before approval? Yep, and the other requirement was a CONCRETE financial plan, that didn't happen either. And as far as 'everything is settled and paid off', you and I will be long gone from this world before that ever happens. Better stay put in KC as you are definitely not abreast of the situaton in Omaha (and as a NON taxpayer/resident in this city, your opinion is moot anyway).
    Posted by: Informed on Feb 28, 2008 at 06:03 PM
    The city is aware there is a EPA covenant on the use of this land, it prohibits use as a day care, preschool, playground, athletic field,picnic ground, dormitory, and nursing home. This was given to the city in October 2007. But the mayor, some of our council and the committee pushed forward keeping this from the public and going as far as denying knowledge of. So therefore if you are hiding this from the public of course it is not included in the proposal. It will definitely raise the cost of the stadium possibly driving this project over $200 million or more. Nor is the city being honest about needing more land for parking which this land is not in the proposal either. If that ends up an UPRR property the same covenant applies.
    Posted by: Fan on Feb 28, 2008 at 05:47 PM
    I too will not be attending a game in Omaha anymore, it sounds like a mess. I never liked being downtown. I too came for the history.
    Posted by: CWS fan on Feb 28, 2008 at 05:45 PM
    You mean we will be able to park on CONCRETE now? You also mean I will be able to walk to a bar after the game rather than get in my car and wait for 2 hours for the congested 13th street to clear out? Man, I get to watch my city on TV and NOT see dumpy EMPTY houses?? Great day for REASONABLE people.
    Posted by: RM on Feb 28, 2008 at 05:42 PM
    All of those that want the stadium should be willing to put their assets up to guarantee the loan. Maybe they are all to rich to care if taxes go up?
    Posted by: Parking on Feb 28, 2008 at 05:33 PM
    The traffic study was done at two Creighton Games to say we will not have any problems downtown. Why not at the Bon Jovi Concert the results would have been different. The truth about statistics is the data is very easily skewed to support an agenda.
    Posted by: Bob on Feb 28, 2008 at 05:28 PM
    WOW, why do you keep posting the stupid comments? I know of several people that posted comments offering an argument to some points being brought up, all i see are anti-stadium comments, guess it's clear where you stand. Thanks for HELPING Omaha....
    Posted by: Revenue Minded on Feb 28, 2008 at 05:02 PM
    I wonder how many more conventions will go across the river, there the parking is free and next to the building. Location of this new stadium is a huge error in judgment.
    Posted by: Run for Office on Feb 28, 2008 at 04:57 PM
    So many of you have the sure fire solutions, yet don't leave your front porch. Run for office, offer a solution, rather than just yelling about something you are uneducated on.
    Posted by: Don on Feb 28, 2008 at 04:51 PM
    For all those that say that taxes won't go up need to think twice. Fahey advised that he is planning to take keno money from Douglas county. This same money is already accounted for spent by the county. If you take money from Peter, how are you going to pay Paul. But lik esaid earlier, some of you just want to believe everything you're told. By the way, I have some swamp land for sale, only floods a couple times a year.
    Posted by: Casinos on Feb 28, 2008 at 04:49 PM
    Had this state just done the right thing, the two casinos down town would have funded this by themselves! BUT that river stops all crime from entering. Didnt we have 30 days with about 30 shootings?
    Posted by: J on Feb 28, 2008 at 04:35 PM
    You all need to get over it because the new stadium is going to happen, either you like it or not. And once everything is settled and paid off and the city starts making good profit off of it and is able to build more attractions and have a better commercial economy you will then appreciate it. P.S. Im not a Fahey Fan!
    Posted by: J on Feb 28, 2008 at 04:34 PM
    C - lack of atmosphere? You think that the 50 something year old guy with his beer gut hanging out of his cut off jean-shorts while letting you pay $20 to park your gilapi in his yard is atmosphere? At lest the city is now trying to make this thing fan-friendly and not a backwoods get together of local know-it-alls. The CWS looks more like a nascar event in South Omaha than it does a NCAA Championship get together. I fully support the idea of kicking in new money to mak the place respectable and inviting to people who don't know Omaha. From a Rosenblatt perspective, they would think that Omaha was in Arkansas and not Nebraska.
    Posted by: Randy on Feb 28, 2008 at 04:27 PM
    The NCAA is requiring broad based community support for this proposal. It obviously it not there. The polls I have seen are 50-50 at best for the new stadium. Time to move on to new and better ideas...
    Posted by: Thankful on Feb 28, 2008 at 04:12 PM
    Thank you to MECA board and David Sokol for standing up to the mayor to ask the hard questions.
    Posted by: Common Sense on Feb 28, 2008 at 04:01 PM
    Folks; As some of you are pointing out, IF WE HAVE NO PLAN TO PRESENT TO THE NCAA, WE WILL LOSE THE CWS! Everyone clear?! OK, now that we are on the same page, here is the COMPLEX part; THE PLAN doesn't HAVE TO BE downtown, that is a SEPERATE ISSUE. What the NCAA wants from us is; HERE IS THE PLAN THAT HAS BROADBASED PUBLIC SUPPORT AND THAT WILL SATISFY THE CWS FOR THE TERM OF THE CONTRACT AND HAS SOLID FINANCIAL BACKING TO SEE IT TO COMPLETION. Our Mayor has presented only ONE plan with NO broadbased public support and SHAKEY finances at best. What the NCAA said (and I hope you ALL were listening) was that while they LIKED the downtown design, the Mayor needed to accomplish the two seperate tasks mentioned above BEFORE they would approve it. DID THE NCAA DEMAND/REQUEST/THREATEN OMAHA FOR A NEW STADIUM? NO! That is the responsibility of the MAYOR & COMITTEE. If we want to KEEP the CWS, we need to compromise (are you listening to us MAYOR?) and present a BETTER plan to the NCAA
    Posted by: Jennifer on Feb 28, 2008 at 04:00 PM
    I couldn't be happier with a downtown stadium. It makes sense financially, location-wise (to hotels, food, and other amenities), and for our future and children's future. Way to go Fahey!
    Posted by: Bob on Feb 28, 2008 at 03:53 PM
    And the parking at rosenblatt is good???? no. i have sat in traffic for over an hour after a cws game.... it will be much more smooth at qwest...
    Posted by: Senior citizen on Feb 28, 2008 at 03:49 PM
    Retirement can make you choose between food and medicine. Struggling to pay the property even with homestead exemption. Please protect the older generation that shares this city from taxation without a voice.
    Posted by: Money on Feb 28, 2008 at 03:40 PM
    Sweet not only will I be in debt from being in college but now I have a slap on taxes. I love not having money.
    Posted by: Ride the Bus on Feb 28, 2008 at 03:31 PM
    If PARKING is the biggest problem to the people in this city, it shows how petty people are. PARKING?!?!! Forget our future as a city, PARKING IS A HASSLE.... come on people.......
    Posted by: Jeff on Feb 28, 2008 at 03:21 PM
    Great job to Mayor Fahey, Meca, and the CWS. I am so happy to see our city leaders finally work together to grow our great city. The plan for the new stadium has been carefully drafted and addressed my concerns. I am anxious to see the benefits to Omaha from all the future development. I am sorry to see Rosenblatt come to an end, but when even Johnny Rosenblatt's son supported a new stadium downtown, I realized the best option for Omaha and its tax payers. Now we need to ralley together to make this another one of our city's successes. Buy the big O!
    Posted by: N on Feb 28, 2008 at 03:17 PM
    I'm almost ashamed to be from Omaha...why is everyone so naive? If we want the city to grow and progress, we have to be willing to spend a little money to do so. Why is the tradition of Rosenblatt so important to everyone? Let Rosenblatt take its proper place in history, and let's build a new, better stadium downtown. And as for the traffic...give me a break, it can't POSSIBLY be worse than it already is. I'm sure everyone at one time or another has driven down I-80 and had to sit there for hours during the CWS. Everyone is just making up excuses!
    Posted by: Shelly on Feb 28, 2008 at 03:11 PM
    So how much is the Zoo paying for the 43 acres ??? Are those $$$ figured into the new staduim price ??? Or does the Zoo get a freebie ???
    Posted by: Baseball fan on Feb 28, 2008 at 03:10 PM
    PLAY BALL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    Posted by: Scott Christensen on Feb 28, 2008 at 02:56 PM
    I favor it as long as we don't up the tax on food for those dining out!!!! Or use the sin tax which is always looked at first. User fee, like a tax on ticket sales until the stadium is paid for is preferred. For those not going to the stadium or renting a hotel room, shopuld not have to fund the new stadium project!!! scott
    Posted by: Vincent Petak on Feb 28, 2008 at 02:28 PM
    I say they should leave the stadium right where it is. the reason why because its tradition to have the collage world series there. IT NEEDS TO STAY.
    Posted by: randy on Feb 28, 2008 at 02:25 PM
    isnt daub an investor in ricks boatyard? and who else is .or has a benefit from it going there
    Posted by: Marsha on Feb 28, 2008 at 02:20 PM
    We Need a new leader, are taxes are high enough.
    Posted by: Tourist on Feb 28, 2008 at 02:18 PM
    I will not being coming into Omaha anymore is sounds like it will be too costly and INCONVENIENT to attend either the Qwest or the new stadium. We liked the atmosphere of Rosenblatt, the history brought us.
    Posted by: Baffled on Feb 28, 2008 at 02:15 PM
    FAHEY seems to like the position of dictating to us what is best but refuses to give clear answers to the hard questions.
    Posted by: Recall Fahey on Feb 28, 2008 at 02:05 PM
    Price of new downtown stadium - $140 million Price to renovate Rosenblatt - $60 million Price to recall Fahey - Priceless
    Posted by: Sylvia on Feb 28, 2008 at 02:04 PM
    It is sad to see the NCAA official going along with Fahey's plan to push this city into greater debt. He just needs to prove support, and find the funding. I wonder if the NCAA will be fooled into believe that all costs were addressed and that the people truely were allowed to decide since the majority of their ticket sales come from Omaha. MARKETING is a process of psychologically convincing someone they need what is being sold. With about 90% of what is on our shelves being bad for our health or lead poisoning our children & pets we are supposed to believe that a big pretty vague presentation with values assigned is best for us. This is such a waste of time when we have a beautiful stadium with recent improvements in the last year to be salvaged at a cut rate of cost.
    Posted by: Tonya on Feb 28, 2008 at 02:02 PM
    with almost 300 comments, is anyone even listening to what "we the tax payers" want, or are they going to do what they want anyways.
    Posted by: Tonya on Feb 28, 2008 at 02:00 PM
    If they "renovate" the 60 yr. old stadium, won't that make it a "NEW" stadium?? Just leave it where it is. Have you seen the parking for an event at the Qwest Center??? Parking a mile away, and they want to "take away" two of the parking lots. What ever?? take all this "MONEY" and put it to better use.
    Posted by: Marge on Feb 28, 2008 at 01:57 PM
    How can he say it is what best for everyone when it wil benefit the minority of the population? DEFINITELY in a round about way it will raise the cost of living in this city. What about our CHILDREN????
    Posted by: Marilyn on Feb 28, 2008 at 01:56 PM
    Wait until construction starts around the Qwest Center...Won't that be a nightmare if you plan to attend a function there or if you work in the vicinity. I can see all the construction workers using the other Qwest Center lots for their vehicles and equipment. Get ready to shuttle or walk a few miles to Qwest events as this all goes forward. Remember, Creighton may build their own ball field and the Royals still want something a whole lot smaller. Maybe we could use the ballfield to park on in the winter (like we used the infield at AkSarBen in the olden days...)
    Posted by: Donna on Feb 28, 2008 at 01:55 PM
    I was in favor of renovating Rosenblatt. But the way Fahey and the committee of people who have something to gain from the Downtown stadium kept the public in the dark for so long is wrong. And also the fact that someone from the Save Rosenblatt committee wasn't allowed on Mayor Fahey's committee was also wrong. Looks like what Fahey wants he gets.
    Posted by: Sad on Feb 28, 2008 at 01:52 PM
    A variety of sources was not even a consideration for Rosenblatt because she is too old to care for anymore. How old is Fahey?
    Posted by: RM on Feb 28, 2008 at 01:51 PM
    We are being pressured by peer pressure to accept Fahey's plan as a golden cow. I feel like I have gone back to high school, with bullies pushing this plan down our throats. Millionaires seem not to be too worried about taxes.
    Posted by: Surpirse on Feb 28, 2008 at 01:40 PM
    Well this doesn't surprise me about MECA. It all comes down to money for these buisnesses and the mayor. I had hoped that the Mayor would've taken the 5-year deal with the NCAA and during that time, looked into a stadium downtown. This was all so rushed and he even said so himself. All the comments about it not effecting us you may or may not be correct - if the private donations don't come through or if profits from other taxes aren't met, the citiziens will have to foot the bill. Aa far as people who live on credit and bought more of a house than they could afford- you don't know those peoples circumstances - businesses fire and lay people off - I have seen this happen alot lately. I live in South Omaha, built a house here 12 years ago, live close enough to Rosenblatt to endure all the headaches that come with the CWS and reap no benefits - and I still don't want the new stadium built. I want other things in Omaha to be taken care of , Sewer, Pensions, crime, homelessness, etc..
    Posted by: MRH on Feb 28, 2008 at 01:37 PM
    Where is the figures for improvements to the 480 that will be needed to handle the traffic, figures for traffic control, overtime for police or will crime be forgotten as a priority, new signs, changing of all the literature pertaining to the area. I see no plans for an infrastructure. No concrete plans to fill the stadium year round unlike the convention center. So in the winter we will walk to our concerts by a stadium that used to be a more convenient place to park. It is quite cold and windy downtown during the winter because it is the river valley. The cost of soil removal with EPA restrictions of use of this property a new agreement will have to be made. This is very very costly, that is why the soil was left under the parking lots in question. Maybe even widening of the streets down there will be next. This is only the beginning of the spending. Do not give the mayor a blank check.
    Posted by: Michelle on Feb 28, 2008 at 01:28 PM
    Progressive means forward thinking, financially responsible and creative. If Fahey was progressive he would fight to save Rosenblatt. Progressive does not mean having the latest and greatest toys at any expense.
    Posted by: Catherine on Feb 28, 2008 at 01:22 PM
    Why are we doing this now? What about the debt and failing infrastructure. I do not understand a city that feels it's responsibility is not to the people trying to survive in this current economy.
    Posted by: Cletus on Feb 28, 2008 at 01:22 PM
    Im just really having a hard time understanding 140 million dollars going to pay for a staudim that "may" be used for a month out of the year, just so we can claim to have the cws. This whole thing is lame & we are all gonna be so screwed when all that glorious private funding never comes. The world is facing a reccession but whether you wanna admit it or not...Who cares about the cws if nobody but the mayor & his cronies can afford to go see it? Believe me I am all for advancement in this city, but at what cost. Is it really worth raising taxes for a weeks worth of crappy baseball
    Posted by: Michael on Feb 28, 2008 at 01:21 PM
    I am a 26 year old Omaha native, as I've grown I have watched the city grow right along with me. I am a college baseball fanatic, attending my first CWS game at the age of six I have not missed a year yet. I anxiously await those two weeks all year long, and even use vacation days to attend games. Like I said, fanatic! I would love to share that experience with my children someday. Rosenblatt is a beautiful venue with so much history, but that history is well documented and will never be forgotten. With time comes change, and I believe the new stadium is a change for the better. Downtown Omaha has been going through some wonderful transitions in the last few years, and it is important to keep that momentum up. People are so concerned with parking and traffic, but have they ever tried to navigate through the narrow neighborhood streets of South Omaha to find a parking spot? Downtown is the best choice hands down, and I look forward to attending the CWS for another 20 years.
    Posted by: Tax Question on Feb 28, 2008 at 01:18 PM
    For you tax experts out there. Am I correct that, if the stadium is financed with tax exempt bonds, and the city leases the facility to a non-tax exempt entity, like the Royals, the bonds will lose their tax exempt status? I heard that this issue has come up in some other stadium projects for professional sports teams. In essence, the Royals have to be permitted to use the stadium at no rent. I do not know if this affects Creighton, as they are a tax exmept entity. How does this affect the financing proposal (and who is advising "mayor landow" on this project)?
    Posted by: Sources? on Feb 28, 2008 at 01:18 PM
    All of the various sources have absolutely no guarantee of success but a definite guarantee of a fight over keno. And more than likely will be a property tax increase & utility bill increase of up to $50 a month or more. Fahey is always taking from somewhere when will he address the DEBT!!!
    Posted by: Elections on Feb 28, 2008 at 01:05 PM
    Fahey must not plan on running for re-election - with this, Elkhorn, most of West Omaha, and now South Omaha, will vote him out of office.
    Posted by: CJ on Feb 28, 2008 at 01:03 PM
    CWS Oversight Cmt. Informational meetings: North, South and Midtown is ignoring the west side especially since Omaha goes out to practically the Elkhorn River at 220th Street area. Midtown is more 110th for Midtown to be applicable When are they going to schedule a meeting in Western Omaha? Otherwise aren't we ignored out here in the 132nd & on west? What are they afraid of out here? A higher taxed home locations that would be the payer of the bulk of the higher taxes to pay for the stadium? Or Elkhorn people filling the hall that would boo Mayor Fahey? I would invite those with the RECALL of FAHEY petitions to these meetings...you would probably have enough signtures in quick order.
    Posted by: Toney on Feb 28, 2008 at 01:03 PM
    It seems funny to me it takes a baseball stadium to bring out all of these comments. Where are all of you when an area of the city right down the road from the proposed stadium, is flooding with backed up sewage. I'm pretty sure this much needed stadium will have a adequate sewer system.
    Posted by: Did you know? on Feb 28, 2008 at 01:00 PM
    The homes in the Rosenblatt area were marketed using the stadium as a reason to buy, not the zoo. Just like property has been bought and sold downtown for several years being marketed that the stadium would move downtown for them to have instead of the historical location it is at. This marketing was done knowing already that the area had an EPA covenant on it preventing athletic fields on the property. Sad that they were taken but it does not mean that the rest of us have to be.
    Posted by: John on Feb 28, 2008 at 12:59 PM
    Since 1987 Omaha has spent 33 million dollars on Rosenblatt. Now the city is saying that the stadium is old and decrepit and we need a new stadium. My question is who oversaw the work that has been done and apparently did not verify that the work was dont to approved standards and if the same is done with a new stadium, where will we be 20 years from now? Will it be considered old and decrepit also?
    Posted by: Citizen on Feb 28, 2008 at 12:53 PM
    We all know who will be in the sky boxes, this is part of the donor money, Kiewit will do the construction, HDR the planning and etc. Can you say a set up from the start with the committee just there to justify Fahey's plan for his own land at the other side of the walk bridge.
    Posted by: ann on Feb 28, 2008 at 12:46 PM
    you have got to be kidding ... Fahey just wants his name on something - the Royals have too big of a ball park now and you want them to use something even bigger? stupid - we should get a vote on this. i know the public funding will come in the form of even more taxes ... we should all move to iowa.
    Posted by: /// on Feb 28, 2008 at 12:26 PM
    How many of these people that approve this spending rent and do not pay property taxes? They must never plan to buy here maybe in Iowa?
    Posted by: Confused on Feb 28, 2008 at 12:22 PM
    When I have travelled to downtown Denver what you see most is Homeless Panhandling and the majority being children. I wished each time that I had a hotel room closer to something interesting to see. We went for a walk at nights after working to only find out we were walking in the most dangerous part of town later. I am thankful we did not get hurt. In downtown Georgia we were almost mugged at a gas station. Bring tourists all to one place and thieves and pan handlers will definitely come to get what they can. As we make the rift betweeen rich and poor greater for the sake of progress.
    Posted by: Marianne on Feb 28, 2008 at 12:21 PM
    We are in a recession, yet we are spending money in the City of Omaha like it is going out of style! We all live on restricted budgets, times are bad. The City needs to quit spending what it doesn't have. If the housing market was not so bad; I would leave this city and this State. Noone can afford to live here anymore, a multimillion dollar ballpark that is only full 10 days out of the entire year. Shame on you Mike Fahey, shame on you.
    Posted by: Alex on Feb 28, 2008 at 12:17 PM
    J says there is nothing fun for the children to do at Rosenblatt. How about watching the baseball game?
    Posted by: RMH on Feb 28, 2008 at 12:10 PM
    I guess we should all plan to have our children grow up and live elsewhere because it will be impossible for them to survive with the cost of living so high only to continue to grow higher with this Fahey plan.
    Posted by: Larry Bauman on Feb 28, 2008 at 12:09 PM
    I'm glad that Omaha is going to get a new stadium, but just like the new Sprint Center in Kansas City,as a working man. I'm like the rest of Americans trying to earn a living, with threating job loss, won't be a participant on any of these high dollar events. Higher taxes collected from lodgeing, food, & ect I also veto when ever possible. I can't afford to be a charity for certain interest pet projects.
    Posted by: MMM on Feb 28, 2008 at 12:08 PM
    The mayor has done it divided the city without a vote, that he says would of been divisive. But the poll number are the majority of us are still opposing the new stadium. Thank God for some common sense in Omaha. It gives one hope we will get controll of spending.
    Posted by: ? on Feb 28, 2008 at 12:05 PM
    The men presenting this plan on the committee look a little old. Maybe we should replace the committee and have a fresh look at this.
    Posted by: ?? on Feb 28, 2008 at 12:02 PM
    What kind of old boy threats made MECA change their minds?
    Posted by: Pretty Woman on Feb 28, 2008 at 12:01 PM
    I am a pretty woman that does not ever want to walk in the dark to a concert in downtown Omaha. So I guess I will no longer be attending the Qwest. Too bad, I have seen over a dozen concerts there. I hope SOKOL & DAUB really know what they are doing this time around. Because Daub also left off the clean up costs until after the project started, this is why a large portion of the contaminated soil is buried under those parking lots. I was not one to complain about the parking before but this is unreal depending on lots that take care of the downtown businesses and condo living. I wish we had a better mayor.
    Posted by: Angry on Feb 28, 2008 at 11:56 AM
    The men who want this should be the ones to guarantee the bonds, the donors that want this should be guarantee to the bonds, the citizens still have to pay the entire principle on the Qwest because the bonds revenue failed to pay anything more than interest at this point. MECA plan to cover the soil cleanup and the negotiations with EPA to allow an athletic field in an area we were all told would stay capped. WHAT A NIGHTMARE FOR OMAHA!!!! SHH!!! We are not supposed to consider the truth...
    Posted by: D on Feb 28, 2008 at 11:52 AM
    If you voted against the casinos in Omaha, you better NOT be on here complaining about tax hikes and city revenues.
    Posted by: Barb on Feb 28, 2008 at 11:52 AM
    People are posting saying that those of us not supporting a new stadium are selfish. I think not. We are tired of taxes, tired of being railroaded by a mayor who does not let the people who put him in office vote on this. Also, someone commented on having a stadium where the children can play. Well, maybe I am missing something but when you go to a ballpark, it IS to see a ballgame! If kids don't want to see a game, leave them home or take them to the Family Fun Center or Dave & Busters! As for the zoo wanting to expand, Dr. Simmons has said they have enough land to expand on. He never said they needed the land Rosenblatt sits on. $140 million for a ballpark that will not be used for most of the year is alot of $$$. This city has more important things to take care of that affects everyday life.
    Posted by: Dave on Feb 28, 2008 at 11:50 AM
    To: J (creighton student) why should the taxpayers be responsible for building Creighton a new stadium? I have no problem with then using it,IF and only IF they pony up more than concessions to use it. NU payed a large portion of their stadium cost and the Salt Dogs picked up most of the rest. Why should CU be any different? And a Super Regional?? Even if CU made it that far it Wont happen because there are NCAA rules that prohibit a Super Regional being held in the same ball park as the CWS..Just so you know!
    Posted by: MM on Feb 28, 2008 at 11:48 AM
    In this city only many millions have been spent on historic renovation, it is placement that is so important, the history has been a driving force in Rosenblatt for 60 yrs for us to throw her away and send her to the dump or to be recycled with most of her improvements never realizing a return in a very modest figure compared to $140 million to go new. It was only $35 million for the improvemets to be trashed how is that good economics for anyone. The history made us different in a market, new will just lead to CWS going elsewhere in the end with the citizens paying for a huge stadium for just the Royals and Creighton because bars & hotels to sleep drunk in are the biggest priority for this city. Very Very Very Sad.
    Posted by: Jessica on Feb 28, 2008 at 11:47 AM
    Has the entire city forgotten about the sewer systems that need replaced?
    Posted by: Jackie on Feb 28, 2008 at 11:43 AM
    here is the deal....wether we like it or not we have to get behind the new stadium. For NCAA aproval there needs to be overwhelming community backing. Do we want the CWS to be gone forever or just in a new stadium. Personally I am VERY upset to see Rosenblatt go but would rather have the CWS here than anywhere else.
    Posted by: Dave on Feb 28, 2008 at 11:40 AM
    Bob..they will raise other taxes that will weffect every citizen in Omaha,I gurantee that.
    Posted by: Phil on Feb 28, 2008 at 11:21 AM
    $139.79 million??? What is up with the city governments around here? Papillion decides they want WalMart or a splash park in a residential neighborhood and they do it in spite of the desires of the people. La Vista wants to give millions to a millionaire so he'll build near Cabelas, and they do it in spite of the desires of the people. Now, Omaha is spending millions on a stadium in spite of the desires of the people. I think our mid-west values and 'good life' are quickly dying to the over zealousness of our city leaders.
    Posted by: MRH on Feb 28, 2008 at 11:20 AM
    The comments for the stadium have no substance just hey lets build it, it wil be great, I liked the pictures. People that approve this should start donating there savings towards this idea instead expecting the community to fund a stadium to replace the one we have because the mayor thinks 60 yrs is too old. How old is our Mayor, he has to be around 60, so maybe he is too old as well and should be replaced with a more compassionate man with a strong minded civic duty to provide a good set of services and a balanced budget with some knowledge how not too give city pensions a blank check in order to be re-elected.
    Posted by: Mark on Feb 28, 2008 at 11:16 AM
    Why doesn't anyone mention the horrible parking situation at Rosenblatt during the CWS or Royals Fireworks night, or even Husker/Creighton games. I guess you would rather pay $10-$20 bucks to park in some unpaved, unsecured yard then the so-called outrageous $6 the city charges. The Zoo needs the land for both expansion and parking. Let's not let what is now a world class facility get stuck with no room to stay that way.
    Posted by: Dennis p on Feb 28, 2008 at 11:16 AM
    Elkhorn and Rosenblatt Stadium, A city that had no choice of getting annexed and a Stadium that never had a chance of being in the mix. Taxpayers lose again.
    Posted by: MH on Feb 28, 2008 at 11:10 AM
    There is much more to this city than just downtown. There is far more choices to dine in west Omaha. This is where I meet the tourists when they come. We are so sure that 25,000 people will just mill around in the downtown area for the convenience. I would not like this if I were a tourist. The downtown area can overcrowded as it is with any event. This all makes no sense to me. I have two Businesss Degrees graduating with highest honors, I believe in integrity, honesty & commitment to do what is right. Of course Creighton students and condo dwellers like the idea but this is a very small part of the population for the entire area to fund. They must not work for TIPS!!!
    Posted by: RM on Feb 28, 2008 at 11:03 AM
    We need to change the laws to provide the opportunity to vote on Revenue Bonds. This is FISCAL IRRESPONSIBILITY just like what is happening at a federal level. Revenue Bonds are failing because of economic stress on the people of this country. Is Fahey ready to fix the economy for the country when he has little desire to take care of debt locally. He definitely refuses to be honest with us about the debt or the pension shortage. The English pound is now almost worth twice that of the American dollar. The stock market continues to tumble struggling to gain the overinflated count to begin with. Everyone's retirement money that is tied up in stocks are at risk and the value is falling. NO GUARANTEES THAT FAHEY's PLAN WILL WORK because we the citizens of this community will have to pay the bill just like the Qwest principle will definitely raise property taxes in 2013. Obligations come up conveniately after the mayor's time is over. Foolish to agree to this without definite funding.
    Posted by: Maria on Feb 28, 2008 at 10:47 AM
    I called the mayor's line to ask about the Qwest property tax increase and was told no information until a signed contract from the NCAA. I was told to accept Fahey's decisions without question because he was elected by this city and is in charge of this city. And most of all he knows what is best for us, and now he has experts to back him up. The committee is seeded with FREE experts who stand to gain when they build the stadium because it would be a waste to be fair and have open contract bidding on this project. NOTHING IS FOR FREE IN THIS WORLD THAT IS A FACT!!!
    Posted by: J on Feb 28, 2008 at 10:47 AM
    4 tickets to new stadium $50.00, refreshments $40.00, parking $10.00, hummm..let me see..how many people out there can afford a family outing for $80-$100? What happened to affordability?
    Posted by: pt on Feb 28, 2008 at 10:38 AM
    I am not a baseball fan, and I never go downtown so I'm not emotionally involved with either decision. On websites I've visited outside of Omaha I read where coaches and players of CWS want to stay at Rosenblatt, and we have already spent money on renovations there. I can already see where this proposal is going. You cannot get a real commitment for a "donation", and when the economy gets worse the donations will not be there. The county board is already talking tax increase so you can count on that too. We are being sold on an investment that will benefit certain businessmen and insiders of downtown development. There will probably be millions more spent on studies and designs they can't use, like the footbridge. For those who believe the figures and who will pay for this, all I can say is I wish I had something to sell you!
    Posted by: parking on Feb 28, 2008 at 10:28 AM
    are you serious? parking is already a hassle. where are people going to park? oh i get it. rosenblatt will be demolished, and they will shuttle from there. wonderful idea folks.
    Posted by: gdubs on Feb 28, 2008 at 10:26 AM
    $59.24 million in public funding? How about we administer a 1% increase in the hotel/motel tax, a $2.00 increase in the city's rental car fee and Keno funds and put all of that money into aging schools, improved teacher pay, and additional city law enforcement (maybe those let go from the Elkhorn annexation)? I can't believe that people think this is a good idea.
    Posted by: Yolanda on Feb 28, 2008 at 10:24 AM
    How can we all feel secure in this city when the priority is stadium first, then caring for the city if we have anything left over last. No answers to the debt on bonds still owed & pension shortages & sewers still fall on the peoples utility bills this will hurt the retired, disabled and single parent families the most. If utilities are shut off the families will be forced to move out and become part of the homeless. City law prevents people from staying in their homes without utilities. Sewage in our basements is OK!!! Definitely not a priority because those affected are in a low tax part of town the same part the new stadium will be in. In a time that people may be required to move throughout this city because of creeks that have been buried causing problems with our quality of our water. Water is not a priority, so build a baseball field on a site that is definitely in the Tributary system. I hope we all like mud.
    Posted by: Kevin on Feb 28, 2008 at 10:16 AM
    To Anne- putting the park out west makes little sense. A benifit of a downtown park is the exposure to the skyline that you don't get way out west. And Elkhorn? forget it! you didn't want to be a part of the city, you don't get the benefits then!
    Posted by: C on Feb 28, 2008 at 10:09 AM
    The Royals average 1500 people show up for a game, a new stadium will not change this. Oh, I forgot we need more bars down there to attract more fans because the reason only 1500 come is they are boring to watch waiting for a score. This will make so they can go have a drink instead, let see the Mattress Factory which Fahey has an interest in. I find it hard to believe his plan has so many holes in it, that it makes sense not to do this. The Royals ticket receipts will never pay for this stadium. Angry fans who have lost generationally paid for seats will not come anymore for lack of atmosphere.
    Posted by: Bob on Feb 28, 2008 at 10:09 AM
    I have a question, to all your anti-new stadium folks, how many of you ACTUALLY go to the CWS? So if the cost is not put on your shoulders, why do you care?! let those that WANT to take their children for many years to the CWS have the chance, rather than screaming and yelling about something you don't even support or will be affected by. Just a reason to argue for some of you. Shame on you.
    Posted by: O on Feb 28, 2008 at 10:04 AM
    What angers me most is we are treated like children to be seen and not heard... Major decisions in our local economy are manipulated in a way to keep us quiet. We all know how town hall meetings go. Vague answers or no comment at all is the case with Fahey at all of the town hall meetings held so far. No comment section on his website because he really does not want us to know about others opinions. Only email us and we will market you one on one. I am thankful for channel 6, the other channels seem to not want the opinions of others know. We were supposed to be told who the $42 million dollar donors were to be. We are to believe a conversation is sufficient proof the funds are there. Rosenblatt project plans were padded with unneeded improvements to sway the public opinion. I saw eagles, hawks and falcons while I viewed games. These birds do not spend a lot of time near contaminated areas. So no more nature for are guests. They can go anywhere in the US to see concrete.
    Posted by: City of Indianapolis on Feb 28, 2008 at 09:59 AM
    Love it, keep it up Omaha. At this rate we'll get the CWS THIS YEAR!
    Posted by: R on Feb 28, 2008 at 09:55 AM
    We are lambs led to slaughter concerning the state of finances in this city. The bills will become property tax increase as soon as the Revenue Receipts do not cover the bill. All across the U.S. Revenue Receipts are falling creating holes in community budgets. The wise save and pay off their debt during a time like this economy is going through. The ignorant and blind who want everything new without the funds to pay for it finance it to wait till later. I think we need a new financial consultant to look at our city budget and better manage the money. Economic expansion is good when it has reasonable expectations. This is a bad time to build. If we waited we may see a turn around in our economy with the right leaders. Everyone is forgetting that at the Federal level we are all pinned with debt due to the war.
    Posted by: Will on Feb 28, 2008 at 09:53 AM
    Take a Vote.
    Posted by: R on Feb 28, 2008 at 09:48 AM
    Closed door meetings always the topic. We are only to hear the marketing of this. Because it is done be experts we have to believe in this. Fahey was on the committee to get his way. Sokol quit playing because it jeporadized the succes of the Qwest. With over $800 million in bond debt on the line, why are we taking this risk. We all know how he treats us when we complain we are detractors. Using Revenue Bonds with inflated expectations from an economy struggling so hard to get by just paying for fuel. How much will this project cost really? The infrastructue does not exist nor is it included in the plan.Using the main road to the airport could cause great inconvenience to anyone flying into our city.Most fans drive except the teams & press who are always pressed for time trying to catch a plane in the final days of the season. I believe we have a better chance preserving what we have,paying down the current debt&repair the infrastructure of our city without shifting the projects to us.
    Posted by: Ben on Feb 28, 2008 at 09:47 AM
    New stadium? OK idea I guess. Faheys the boss and he has his finger on the pulse of the city. But downtown? Not a good idea. Traffic is gonna be like downtown Los Angeles.I dont think 480 can take it. Get ready to spend more tax dollars on the rippling effect this stadium is gonna have. Widening 480, more overtime for police etc. I guess thats progress....right??
    Posted by: J on Feb 28, 2008 at 09:42 AM
    It is clearly obvious that none of you have been to a Creighton home baseball game in years. Have any of you ever been to a Royals game? Creighton scheduled more games this year than ever to be played at Rosenblatt, why? Maybe because they need a bigger stadium to hold crowds. The Royals want something more fan-friendly rather than you pull into a desolate looking 60's era Rosenblatt, with nothing fun for the children to do at the game. Hence the entire reason for the city to build a better stadium that could house Creighton, Omaha Royals, and keep the CWS here too. I didn't know that everyone in Omaha was an expert in every aspect of local government or psychology? I go to Creighton, I love watching the games, but with a (projected) ncaa regional or maybe even super regional team this year, I want to be able to attend games in something other than the dump (Creighton Sports complex) that they play now. Plus, the Quest isn't even a drive away. I would even consider watching the royals.
    Posted by: Anonymous on Feb 28, 2008 at 09:40 AM
    Omaha--We need to keep up with the other cities trying to get the CWS. For those of you upset about the downtown parking...Have you been to a CWS game at Rosenblatt?!! I have to park in the residential side streets and walk several miles. Its a mess for the local residents.
    Posted by: mike on Feb 28, 2008 at 09:38 AM
    Once again our mayor has chosen to exclude the tax payer. I also live in the Elkhorn district and with the recent anixation our street services were great now very limited service. Even though the Mayor stated we would not see any changes. I have called to the Mayors office requesting a snow plow and have been hung up on. Our Mayor says and does another. We need a honest mayor that is for the people and not for himself. Mike
    Posted by: J on Feb 28, 2008 at 09:37 AM
    Steve - first off, the homeless cannot beg for money in Omaha, that is called panhandling, and that's illegal. Second, do you think that giving the homeless money would erase the problem of homelessness? What about that lady who just got fired from McDonalds and can't afford her apartment anymore? She'll be homeless in a few months, where's the money going to come from to give her? Giving money to people will never solve homelessness. How many times does someone have to stress that this doesn't and shouldn't be voted on, because you elected mayor fahey? I'm sorry, but that's just how our government works. If you don't like it - move to Canada, join the draft dodgers up there.
    Posted by: R on Feb 28, 2008 at 09:37 AM
    Even if Fahey gets what he wants, you can count on him wanting more. 1. More Parking Lots to Build 2. OOPS forget the covenant on the soil by the EPA stating no athletic fields to be placed on this property. Remember this agreement saved money on the Qwest. How much will this cost to change next. Remember this dust will end up in our air to breath and water we drink. 3. Now we need to help build bars around the stadium or at least give them tax breaks to attract the business. 4. Dome anyone the sun will not be blocked by terrain in the evenings anymore. But Fahey did suggest last year that Omaha would supply sunglasses to the players so they can see better. 5. Ooops historical catastrophe, flooding, heavy rains which we still have no sewer plan. Digging up the river bank that is contaminated to put a huge storage tunnel by the new ball park would be next. Still EPA monitored will cost extra to move the soil. Not too mention the millions to gain the property from UPRR.
    Posted by: A on Feb 28, 2008 at 09:28 AM
    People we are being marketed to believe a lie about Rosenblatt being a failure because it is old. When all of downtown Omaha is filled with Old buildings being restored into historical fixtures which does definitely beyond a shadow of a doubt attract tourists. All of the small towns in Nebraska are trying to preserve history. Fahey wants to destroy the south Omaha economic stability to help him and the few that stand to gain. We the tax payers are to be marketed by pretty pictures and bullet points with vague figures and a system of scoring sites. The committee was set up to do exactly what is happening now. Work together to realize a Fahey fantasy for his new walk bridge which I have heard from many leads directly to land he owns in IOWA. Omaha tax receipts is just a way to fund his fantasy. The Mattress Factory will be next door which many say he has an interest in this bar. When will time and money quit being wasted on him?
    Posted by: F on Feb 28, 2008 at 09:27 AM
    Omaha will never get out of the "hicks and sticks" mindset. Get over it Omaha, you are stuck in the Midwest and will never be "prime time." Let the NCAA move the venue. That is what the public really wants.
    Posted by: Fed Up on Feb 28, 2008 at 09:18 AM
    Fahey has created a large division in this community. Take over of Elkhorn during a blizzard changing locks. Now Douglas county has to fight to survive. Qwest Convention Center must fight for parking rights. And the nation is watching. We are sounding more and more like an unfriendly place to live. The accidents from this week made national news. Such a small storm with such a big failure to make it safe for drivers or even warn them. Keep kids home because of the cold but the ice and accidents are acceptable by our city leaders. The excuse we did not expect it to freeze again overnight. Why did the $40,000 given to HDR not fix this? HDR is planning the new stadium as well because they are experts. It is time for the citizens of Omaha to take back their city before it is too late to manage without extreme poverty as has happened in all of the big cities Fahey compares us to needing to become like. Crime has been so much of a bigger problem with him office. Priorities not needed by him.
    Posted by: Tradition on Feb 28, 2008 at 09:07 AM
    Just once it would be nice to see government think of the people. These private donors and politicians don't respect the tradition of the CWS. They shun the idea of revitalizing a community staked around the tradition of "Road to Omaha" in lieu of better air conditioning in their skyboxes and closer parking for their exotic foreign autos. When's the last time any of these idiots EXPERIENCED the CWS? Tailgating and mingling with thousands who celebrate this event without even attending a game, that is the essence of the CWS. This is totally irresposible government at it's finest. The tradition of the CWS is dead under this plan. Goodbye to the EXPERIENCE. It's only baseball now. If these monopoly mongors could have true vision they would have endorsed allocating these resources to update the stadium and revitalize the entire area surrounding Rosenblatt. Enjoy your new concrete jungle Fahey.
    Posted by: Aaron on Feb 28, 2008 at 09:03 AM
    What people dont realize is that in the early 90's our taxes went up to pay for renovation to the Civic and look what we got afterwards they built the Qwest Center. Our Taxes never went back down. The city decided to keep it this way so that they have more money to spend on whatever. I dont agree with the new stadium because all this is doing is putting this city more in debt then we already are. Why not use the money for the roads or school that we have here. I'm sorry but what is more important, Our children or a baseball team. Save the Blatt!!
    Posted by: ... on Feb 28, 2008 at 08:59 AM
    Our tourists don't need parking, reasonable prices or a place to put their RV. The food establishments will all serve alcohol near this stadium. The original complaint from the NCAA was beer tents too close to the kids. The want a clean family environment. The Royals will cost more than they ever bring in. Creighton is a conflict of interest. Rosenblatt was a good choice for all of these years because it was not a college field. Citizens have been a huge part of this success only to see the good fans leave because they cannot get seats. The season ticket holders will lose their spaces to corporate money to stand in line for general admission. Originally Daub wanted a trolley system to help connect downtown to the stadium and zoo. No longer in any plan yet. Business leaders by Rosenblatt had plans to build up their area using Rosenblatt as the anchor. Now we are to believe build it they will come. At least definitely the Starlings will have another roost downtown.
    Posted by: Jane on Feb 28, 2008 at 08:58 AM
    How can Omaha be considering a 140 million dollar expenditure for the two week event of the College World Series? Why not apply that money to separating storm/sewer systems or improving public transit? Or – heaven forbid – lowering taxes! Traffic in that area is already a nightmare - this will only make it worse. If NCAA doesn't like Rosenblatt, then move the event to another city! Don't go through with this ill conceived monument to Mike Fahey!
    Posted by: Jerry on Feb 28, 2008 at 08:53 AM
    The cost of the stadium is $140,000,000, (which will be sure to rise before the project is completed). The ESTIMATED $42,000,000 in donations will drop the debt to $98,000,000, and Mr. Stinson says that the stadium will raise an estimated $3,000,000 per year. How many of these business people who did this study, would invest their own money knowing that they MAY expect a 3% return? Will the 3% and the revenue fron the hotel tax and car rental pay the interest on the loan? Also, I didn't hear any mention of the cost to demolish Rosenblatt or how much the Zoo is going to pay for the land. They tried to paint a pretty picture but in the end, the tax payer will pay. Just like we will pay for the deficit in the city employees retirement fund. Give Rosenblatt and it's $12,000,000 debt to the zoo, as is. Let Oklahoma City have the College World Series, and let Creighton and the Royals fend for thier self.
    Posted by: Sue on Feb 28, 2008 at 08:51 AM
    I know everyone loves Rosenblatt(so do I) but maybe we should look forward to what the future holds for us. The College World Series is a big deal for Omaha. How many big deals are we willing to lose? All and all, a new staduium makes more sense and our world class zoo needs room to expand. We have two choices, stay in the past or move toward the future.... no brainer to me! As far as the 1% tax increased on hotel tax, we have paid over $100.00 to stay in Allience, Nebraska because that was going rate... I don't feel people will chose not to stay in Omaha because of it, if you want to go somewhere, you pay whatever they ask.... I would love to stay that close to the venue. I say Thank You to everyone invovled in this process.
    Posted by: Julie on Feb 28, 2008 at 08:42 AM
    Good idea, Becky! I'd pay a few bucks to own a few seats from Rosenblatt... I can imagine that quite a few sports bars in town would as well!
    Posted by: Brooke on Feb 28, 2008 at 08:23 AM
    Clearly people are not even looking at our options here and are only thinking they are against more taxes. Well no one likes taxes however this new stadium HAD TO HAPPEN or else we would lose a major event in Omaha- the College World Series. And if you look at the plans and the final costs after private donations, etc it is going to cost the people of Omaha the same amount of money to refurbish Rosenblatt or build the new stadium. So why on earth wouldnt they move forward with the new stadium? People want to be downtown where all of the action is, etc. I think people need to stop being selfish and think about what is best for the city.
    Posted by: jan on Feb 28, 2008 at 08:04 AM
    I would like to know what will happen to Rosenblatt will they tear it down and allow it to be zoned commerical and if so will there be 5 auto parts stores and used car lots and I never heard that the zoo was interested in buying that land ?
    Posted by: AGAST on Feb 28, 2008 at 07:51 AM
    TO THE person WHO CLAIMS TO BE 'YOUR VIEWERS'; Not only do we get unfair taxation without representation by the mayor, but now YOU want censureship as well! Definitely UN-AMERICAN! THANKS WOWT FOR NOT FOLLOWING THIS REQUEST! The PEOPLE need a VOICE and if the MAYOR won't give it to us, no holds are barred!
    Posted by: Mike on Feb 28, 2008 at 07:50 AM
    What good would the "naming rights" do? Because when the College World Series comes to town they will have to cover up the sign and anything else with the name on it like they do with all those banners/advertisers at the Blat since they can not advertise or promote any company/business.
    Posted by: DB on Feb 28, 2008 at 07:40 AM
    To all of those who compare this to the quest are comparing apples and Oranges. The quest can be used 52 weeks out of the year. The Stadium makes money two weeks of the year. Talk to the teams and the coaches and ask them. The out of town fans love the old town feel of where the stadium is to. Mark my word the cost will be at least 200 million dollars. Who are these contributors??????
    Posted by: Barb on Feb 28, 2008 at 07:04 AM
    Regarding the post by Liz...read further down...the new Yankee stadium is being built RIGHT NEXT TO THE OLD ONE!!!! Besides, you CANNOT compare building a major league ballpark to one replacing Rosenblatt. New York city is way bigger than Omaha and more people go to major league games. As for the Qwest Center, that is used year round. The stadium will not be!
    Posted by: Tim L on Feb 28, 2008 at 06:51 AM
    OK, to all of you out there that think this proposal is the greatest thing since the invention of the wheel. I agree with the comment made yesterday afternoon. What about the cost of continued EPA clean-up of the proposed Stadium Site? Also, to all of you with this great "Vision", you had better put your money where your mouth is. DONATE, pay for your stadium. Because I feel that 100% of the financing for something that so many have repeadedly said they are against, had better be paid for privately. DROP ALL PUBLIC FUNDING OF THIS FOLLY! I am tired of my tax dollars being spent on stupidity!
    Posted by: Anne on Feb 28, 2008 at 06:25 AM
    I sure hope Mr. Stinson will be picking me and my family up as we are making our TWELVE MINUTE trek to the Qwest for a Creighton basketball game in the MIDDLE OF WINTER. Obviously, the average family does not park in the Qwest parking garage. Did the brain-trust of this whole debacle ever consider putting the ballpark in the western part of the city. Elkhorn has plenty of space for a ballpark and room for parking, too.
    Posted by: Chuck on Feb 28, 2008 at 06:19 AM
    For all of those people that believe that there will be no taxes to build this thing think again. Hotel tax, car rental tax seat fee, a fee is still a tax they just call it a fee to throw you off. They plan on taking the keno revenue also. Where does the keno revenue go now? I am sure that those funds will have to be made up somehow and that will equate to more taxes or fees on somthing else. No matter what anyone thinks, it will take tax money to build this stadium. 100% of the people of Omaha will be paying for the stadium and only 10% will probably use it more than once. Anyone want to make a bet on what construction firm builds it???
    Posted by: south o girl on Feb 28, 2008 at 06:01 AM
    I grew up in South O and Rosenblatt was great as a kid but like life times goes on and things change. When was the last time any of the oppposing public went to a Royals game? It is like a ghost town in the stands - some people just like the idea of things staying the same which is not reality - WAKE UP OMAHA YOU ARE LOSING A CHANCE TO MAKE OUR TOWN BETTER!!!!!
    Posted by: Anonymous on Feb 28, 2008 at 05:50 AM
    TO: Sick Location: Omaha on Feb 27, 2008 at 10:23 PM "NO NEW TAXES" you say.. Really? That is not guaranteed. Once the keno revenues shift, Douglas County has to make up that loss somehow. How do you think that will be? Hmmmm, a higher TAX levy on your house is how. If I get into a car accident, the RENTAL car that I will have to get, will have a higher TAX on it. Get a clue.
    Posted by: Tom on Feb 28, 2008 at 05:33 AM
    Ok, what happens when they build a new stadium downtown and lose the CWS?
    Posted by: Becki on Feb 28, 2008 at 03:20 AM
    Yada, Yada, Yada, Fahey this Fahey that, give me a break. Its a good thing Fahey had the foresight to look to the future and do whats best for this once cowtown. It sucks to have to build a new stadium, but It's better to bite the bullet now then wait for the Blatt to crumble ten to 2O years from now and spend millions more. Hey one more way to raise money it by selling off parts of Rosenblatt on Ebay. Thats sure to bring in a few bucks. :-)
    Posted by: C on Feb 28, 2008 at 03:05 AM
    I LOVE the idea of a ballpark downtown. however, i was disappointed in the design. the curved seating area down the baselines looked to generic/cheap - it reminds me of the hated cookie cutter stadiums. also, i thought portable seating would be used more. i was expecting a 15k stadium w/ 10k of portable seating.
    Posted by: judy on Feb 28, 2008 at 01:34 AM
    There is alot of space in bellevue and still close to 13th street, why not build it there?
    Posted by: ??? on Feb 28, 2008 at 01:15 AM
    The finance plan for the stadium seems like rob peter to pay paul. In a time when people are choosing between bills, gas, food and medical we want to make it even harder on those depending on tip money or keno revenue or entertainment money for the family. I wonder if Fahey thought that he might really be driving people away from all of the progress Omaha has had so far. With small businesses struggling to make ends meet or raise prices. There is such a fine line between economic success and total economic failure. His plan is flawed and desperate to prove the bigger price tag. This stadium is not a quick fix to the financial problems on the riverfront as it is currently financed. Entertainment tax includes Burger King and the rotissiere chicken from Hy-Vee. This will affect everyone the rich and the poor. Fahey states Rosenblatt is too old and worthless to improve. What changed since the last improvements being approved by the citizens? Or even the last cws game?
    Posted by: Steve on Feb 28, 2008 at 01:05 AM
    I would be all in favor of the "New Stadium" if this committee could assure me that the homeless would not have to beg for money for the next 20-25 years.... The Open Door Mission/The Francis House/The Salvation Army & OPPD/MUD would not have to go on the local networks to expose the financial hardship of individuals that have falling on hard times...to not have the proper clothing...food...living conditions & their heat/water & electricity shut off.... $140 million would eradicate the problem of our homeless...I think? This to me would be a great accomplishment...so I say build the New Stadium but make sure that these organizations have all the money they need so they don't "beg" anymore or at least for the next 20-25 years
    Posted by: Sally on Feb 28, 2008 at 12:24 AM
    This is another case of the government shutting out the citizens, because they know they will be voted down. The mayor is trying to make a name for himself by doing this, and his ego is too big for Omaha. This place is so over taxed now, that people are moving across the bridge, and does anyone in this city or state seem to care? This has to stop - they wouldn't allow any Casino to bring in help on our taxes, but they keep wanting to spend our money and drive people our of our city and state. WE DON'T NEED THIS - WE HAVE A GOOD BALL DIAMOND, stop this before it's too late.
    Posted by: M M on Feb 27, 2008 at 11:14 PM
    $200,000 difference between Rosenblatt and New - I wonder how hard that was to set up. The finance plan is fine as long as a catastrophe such as 9/11, How about the more likely heavy rainfall. Missouri Valley had a historical flood last year. The downtown Omaha area warehouse district flooding from storm waters unable to flow into the river fast enough popped all of the sewer caps in downtown Omaha and CB in 1987. Remember the rain destroying a parking lot full of cars at the airport. It is the riverfront, mother nature will not consider our ball park when it rains. Omaha is in the Missouri River Tributaries.
    Posted by: justin on Feb 27, 2008 at 11:09 PM
    who likes baseball? this stadium would be busy once a year?? obviously that wont pay off lets get a pro football stadium and a team then we could have bowl games, high school football tournaments, large monster truck shows, and a bigger circus. Baseball is faicng to much negativity with the steroids the players are all using and it is a dying sport, plus it is very boring to watch.
    Posted by: Tom on Feb 27, 2008 at 11:01 PM
    A new feild is inevitable, it's going to happen whether we like it or not. Just build it the Traditional baseball direction. Home plate to left feild is straight North and can be modified to go as far as Northeast. Don't turn the feild to face southeast...that's just wrong!!!It's not about seeing downtown...it's about the players playing the game, don't take away from the players on this one. Please do not build it any other direction, anyone that has played as much as these players and coaches coming in have, all know the best of all stadiums built are facing traditional directions...
    Posted by: your viewers on Feb 27, 2008 at 10:38 PM
    WOWT, Omaha will lose the CWS, you guys need to emphasize to your viewers to READ the details before vocalizing their opinions. The NCAA will see this, and realize it's a big issue. It wont be a matter of Rosenblatt or Downtown, it will be a matter of us watching Indy enjoy the great CWS Omaha turned into a national event every two weeks in the Summer. Please, Im begging you, you need to help in this. Your competitors too. ALL of you need to emphasize the facts to the viewers. Please, you don't have to post this, but take it to someone of authority. Im asking you as a loyal viewer, no rain drop ever feels its responsible for the flood, you dont have to tell the people what to think, just emphasize Omaha HAS to read the details. If anyone knows the REAL details, they would support this, knowing what it means for Omaha, AND your sports team. 2 weeks, you have access to a NATIONAL sports event. Every year, you have to cover a 2 week NATIONAL event, that HAS to do well for your ratings.
    Posted by: Lara on Feb 27, 2008 at 10:36 PM
    So when this new stadium goes up (because you know this issue will continue until that is accomplished), will ticket prices become unaffordable just like events at the Qwest? How much more can our budgets handle? How many of us are truly going to be able to enjoy such a facility? Or is it just for those slapping their names on it, and the tourists? And as for parking, why is it this town has trouble learning and understanding the concept of a parking garage? Honestly, when is this town going to grow up?
    Posted by: Doug on Feb 27, 2008 at 10:35 PM
    BEST SOLUTION-----Here is the best way to handle this. PUT IT UP FOR A VOTE. If the majority is build it...then build it and we move on. If the majority is no...then don't build it and we move on. Let each side state their case with facts and let the people decide and the chips fall where they may. BUT, Mr. Fahey, I don't trust you anymore. Your chips are up I think. Maybe I am wrong, but I guess we will have a vote on this one way or another. It might be your re-election vote, but there will be a vote. Unless that is, you know you won't have a chance and decide not to run for re-election. Then maybe you could bid for the naming rights. Let's see...Fahey Memorial Stadium. Mr. Fahey, you struck out. No pun intended.
    Posted by: Hannah on Feb 27, 2008 at 10:35 PM
    I favor this and not oppose it, this could do good for Omaha. I think its a great idea. Many people probably disagree with me. But I do favor this it could end up being a succses
    Posted by: What changed? on Feb 27, 2008 at 10:31 PM
    An article titled NCAA: Rosenblatt just fine for CWS dated 6/4/03 by Eric Olson and AP writer. The article states "Pete Festersen, deputy chief of staff for Mayor Mike Fahey, said the mayor's office has had no discussions with the Royals about a new stadium. "Even if there were a desire, when the city is struggling to provide basic services, any effort would have to be privately funded," Festersen said." I see things have become worse than in 2003 when you consider the unfunded fire and police pension contracts and the 1.5 billion for federally mandated sewer separation. Failure to comply with these important issues for our city could impact the city for many years to come. Even possibly losing federal dollars. A capped contaminated soil will have to be dealt with considering there is a covenant preventing and athletic field on this property. How many millions will this cost? Our mayor paid HDR $40,000 to study snow removal, failing to change the safety of our streets this week.
    Posted by: Chris on Feb 27, 2008 at 10:29 PM
    Ha i laughed a couple years back when ernie chambers said that omaha was a segregated community when all the school talk was going around but now if it is segregated which i dont think it is well You could say now say that this great town i have grown up in is a Dictatorship it pretty sad when we live in such a grand country i am one of the most patriotic persons it just breaks my heart that my own town has to go against the great values of are dear Nation!
    Posted by: Sick on Feb 27, 2008 at 10:23 PM
    It just sickens me how many of you can't read. NO NEW TAXES, IT will NOT cost YOU! WHAT'S THE DARN PROBLEM?!?! You are FREAKING out over something YOU DON'T OWN, the CWS is NOT Omaha's. Fact = We BUILT IT, FACT = we don't OWN IT! LET'S MAKE SURE Omaha enjoys the rewards! ALL OF YOU, need to READ the proposal, without any assumptions. Nebraskan's actually read the facts before making a judgement? Hmm, midwest values alright....the same values that use a stadium debate to take a shot a presidential candidate? Wow....Im an "Omahan"??!?!?
    Posted by: In The Dark Again on Feb 27, 2008 at 10:18 PM
    No comments accepted on city website so others might view. Fahey is again manipulating the outcome without a vote. In a sense he does not want to hear any comment without an identity to attack for having an opinion and being a detractor. This all to give the NCAA the false impression of a community concensus. I think if Fahey and his committee were not so afraid of opinion counter to their own they would of recommended a vote to build a concensus on.
    Posted by: laura on Feb 27, 2008 at 10:12 PM
    The NCAA has yet to give their blessing to this plan. They want the people of Omaha behind it. I don't think they are (PUT IT TO A VOTE!) This is not about the stadium, not about taxes, not about Qwest. What it IS about is under this administration, the streets aren't salted, the sewers are backing up into people's homes, the water mains are breaking, potholes are ruining cars, the infrastructure is crumbling and the City is operating in the red. And some of you blindly think a new stadium for the CWS will solve all this. NO, and NO. These problems will still exist even if the new stadium is built. I certainly hope you pro-stadium people enjoy driving covered wagons to the CWS because that is where this city is headed. And I certainly HOPE the NCAA is attuned to the majority of Omahans when they move the CWS ELSEWHERE. They want it here, let THEM pay for it. (By the way, Omaha made the NBC national news for NOT salting their streets this last time. But hey, the KING wasn't here
    Posted by: Peg on Feb 27, 2008 at 10:11 PM
    We weren't involved in the decision making of Peony Park, why would they involve the people of the "tax me state" to be involved in this decision? This city continues to take away the things that made Omaha what it is. They continue to take away the traditional things that have so much meaning to so many Omaha families...is the Zoo moving next or will they just close??
    Posted by: J on Feb 27, 2008 at 10:09 PM
    For the last and final time, If I see anybody else say this is taxation without representation I might have a cow. YOU ELECTED MAYOR FAHEY!!! HE IS TAXING THOSE WHO ELECTED HIM TO OFFICE!!! THEREFORE, THIS IS TAXING THE ONES HE REPRESENTS!!! STOP SAYING THIS NOW!!! YOU ALL NEED TO GO BACK AND TAKE HIGH SCHOOL ECONOMICS AGAIN!!!
    Posted by: EPA on Feb 27, 2008 at 10:01 PM
    Does the $140 million price tag, as well as the time schedule, address the fact that the stadium is proposed to be built on top of an EPA RCRA site, and additional environmental remedication will be necessary if the cap is disturbed?
    Posted by: ???? on Feb 27, 2008 at 09:54 PM
    I beleive this will only be good for the city if you let this run its course
    Posted by: JJ on Feb 27, 2008 at 09:53 PM
    I am disgusted with this news station for taking such a bias stance on this issue. All WOWT has done is taken Rosenblatts side and made Fahey to look like a criminal, when actually he is saving this city from losing the single most important event it hosts. Now I realize that this post will probably get deleted because I am trying to promote change and WOWT hates change.
    Posted by: Ed on Feb 27, 2008 at 09:49 PM
    For all you naysayers, here's the point by point why you need to quit whining & stop arguing against the donwntown stadium... 1)Public costs are the same for a Rosenblatt fix & the new stadium- stop making up lies about how "our taxes are gonna go up" (wha wha wha). public costs ARE EQUAL with either choice. anyone that continues to argue about the funding is ignorant. i say again, PUBLIC COSTS are EQUAL, whether it's downtown or still at rosenblatt. this isn't about Fahey trying to raise our taxes & not let us have a say, look at the facts--> PUBLIC COSTS ARE EQUAL!!! 2) Parking/traffic: first of all don't pretend it isn't a pain in the *! at Rosenblatt right now. Just this past year I had to park 25 min from the stadium. look at the OWH article on stalls downtown w/in 12 min & stalls at Blatt & realize that a new stadium is the logical choice. could go on & on...
    Posted by: Lizz on Feb 27, 2008 at 09:46 PM
    If they can tear down Yankee stadium, we can tear down Rosenblatt! Change is good people! Embrace it! The College World Series brings significant business, money, and positive national attention to Omaha. If we lose it because we are not willing to embrace change, the city's finances will be much worse in the long run. As for the woman who said she "heard traffic is bad downtown" maybe she should try traveling down there! Do you really get an opinion on this project if you do not attend any games at Rosenblatt or appreciate our last major success as a city, the Qwest Center? I think there are plenty of Omahans that are ready and willing for a new stadium. We are just muffled by the loud whining of the same people who said the Qwest was a bad idea. The success of the Qwest Center speaks for itself: NCAA Division I Volleyball Final Four, Olympic Swim Trials, Regional location NCAA Division I Men’s Basketball, U2, Rolling Stones, Tim McGraw, American Idol, and Hannah Montana! Need I say anything more? Change is good, Omaha. Recognize that we are a wonderful city that has this kind of opportunity for growth!
    Posted by: DB on Feb 27, 2008 at 09:46 PM
    All of this for 1 & 1/2 to 2 weeks of the entire year. Omaha makes that much money two weeks out of the year to do all this. Let the NCAA try to take the series somewhere else. Omaha has hundreds of volunteers that help with all asprcts of the CWS. It would take another city at lesat five years to figure out what we do to make it work. The community doesn't benefit that much from these two weeks, but my guess is that someone does.
    Posted by: non redneck on Feb 27, 2008 at 09:35 PM
    To all of you redneck, south omaha you can park on my lawn for a fee, mayor hating citizens of omaha. This ballpark looks great. Please build it.
    Posted by: Dave on Feb 27, 2008 at 09:27 PM
    The issue I have is the city will break ground,raise the taxes and promise things to the hotels being built(which were promised a new stadium down there,thats why theu built...just a little insider information they got from the mayor)and all this is going to be done even BEFORE a contract is signed with the NCAA?? thats a little odd isn't it
    Posted by: Tim on Feb 27, 2008 at 09:26 PM
    Michele, are you informed...Omaha and Nebraska has many different laws and tax breaks in place for businesses that want to locate here when they bring jobs to the market...I say look at PayPal as an example and i think there have been a "couple" of insurance companies locate here recently.. The reason companies dont locate here is because...the truth...High Paying executives do not want to live in Omaha because of the lack of entertainment(which with the qwest and the Holland its gotten better)...This only enhances that they would relocate....
    Posted by: Tm on Feb 27, 2008 at 09:18 PM
    Don, sorry you dont like the Qwest. Your about one in a million... I think Creighton likes what it has done for them.. I certainly like the fact that the friends I have from Des Moines and Kansas City and Sioux City like it and come often and spend their money...IN OMAHA.
    Posted by: Tim on Feb 27, 2008 at 09:14 PM
    Mike, your right...we are a small city...we cant do things like the Yankees and Dallas....I guess lets just go ahead and give it to Indy...they have a professional baseball team...Opps I mean AAA team.
    Posted by: Michael on Feb 27, 2008 at 09:12 PM
    I have not heard anyone from the CWS demand a new stadium- this is Mayor Fahey's folly. If it is so great then why the opposition to putting it up to public vote? They want my 60 Million in taxes, they should have to ask me for it. If the majority is really behind it like some here claim then a public vote shouldn't be a problem, but then they would have to make a credible argument to the public instead of the fantasy that I saw rolled out at the press conference today.
    Posted by: Tim on Feb 27, 2008 at 09:12 PM
    Scott, Go back to watching your lawn grow...Have a little vision...please dont ever walk across that foot bridge (that was mostly funded by Fed government and private donations). or go to Rick Boatyard. Go back to sitting in the dark in your basement.
    Posted by: Jim on Feb 27, 2008 at 09:10 PM
    What job do the people against the new ballpark have? With the housing construction slump, I look forward to having a job! The new park is a resession buster! These nay sayers must not be construction, plumbers, electricians, drywaller, finish carpenter or work labor.
    Posted by: Tim on Feb 27, 2008 at 09:10 PM
    John D.. Season tickets holder are screwed either way...I have had them on the first base line 10 rows up since 68. If this stays at the Johnny, and IF they redo it, Corporate america is going to get first priorty on seats and everyone else will be reallocated.....thats just the way it is... drive 10 miles and go to a game or fly 700 hundred to Indy and go to one ....your choice.
    Posted by: Tim on Feb 27, 2008 at 09:07 PM
    Debbie in Elkhorn, i mean omaha, you would think the funding was a joke because you havent read the proposal...Read it then you will understand....its not coming from omaha tax payers (hotel, rental cars)...we will be paying higher taxes when we no longer have the series...the existing revenues we have because we no longer have tourists will be down...thats will be higher taxes that YOU will be paying for.
    Posted by: Mortified Tax Payer on Feb 27, 2008 at 09:05 PM
    Come on, Omaha, lets be FAIR! Listen to what the MAYOR & COMMITTEE is FINALLY SAYING!! ...ESTIMATED 42.95 MILLION IN private DONATIONS??? ...PROJECTED $37.6 MILLION IN stadium REVENUE??? EXPECTED $59.24 MILLION IN public FUNDS??? AND IT SOUNDS LIKE A REAL SOLID FINANCIAL PLAN WITH CONCRETE BACKING TO YOU?? DO YOU FEEL COMFORTABLE WITH THE IDEA TAXPAYERS COULD END UP PAYING UP TO $100 MILLION IF ANY AND ALL PORTIONS OF THIS PLAN FAIL TO PRODUCE?? If you are just as MORTIFIED as I am by the WHOLE thing, contact ALL of the CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS and SAY SO! The BALL is now in their court and they are the BEST hope this city has to restore OUR VOICE AND SANITY. If none of this bothers you, are you NOT paying SERIOUS attention??? Richer than the rest of us??? THE MAYOR & COMMITEE?? CALL THE CITY COUNCIL AND SIGN/VOTE/RECALL FAHEY! IT'S YOUR MONEY AND IT IS YOUR CITY! LET'S TAKE IT BACK!
    Posted by: Tim on Feb 27, 2008 at 09:04 PM
    Deb, why dont you check to see who was on the committee to for the CWS site. I think Creighton and Royals reps were both on it and said they would play there. Check you facts before you post unknowns.....
    Posted by: Sue on Feb 27, 2008 at 09:03 PM
    Nobody liked Hal Daub when he wanted to build the Qwest Center - remember? Now how we love it! Having vision is hard but the time is now if we are to keep the CWS. The benefits are far reaching for our community. We bring in more revenue in that 2 week time period than any other time in the year. Funny how all we are hearing from are the people who are mad about it - your group is loud but small.
    Posted by: tim on Feb 27, 2008 at 09:02 PM
    curious location....i think all of your comments from your "office pool" are unwarranted...look at the parking at Rosenblatt and then downtown..plus all the asumption on the other....your office buddies are guessing and im sure they said the same about the qwest. I would much rather pay $10 to park in a parking lot with lights and security and pay for the stadium then someones front yard and not have any of that.
    Posted by: Janlynn on Feb 27, 2008 at 08:57 PM
    I have looked at the figures. How in the world can Fahey say that Renovating Rosenblatt and building a new stadium cost the same ? There are also so MANY "IF's" in the new stadium plan. Parking and access to the location are huge problems. There are NO solutons to these problems. He's talking about 9300 parking spots.....that's nothing for a huge stadium. Can you imagine two events in the same time frame ? Omaha has better sites if this is what they choose to do. A downtown location is NOT looking to the future. Downtown Omaha is old, crowded,and not viable for today's traffic or crowds. I truly think it will be a BUST if Omaha builds it. By the time it's done it will cost at least one and half times the estimate...like always.
    Posted by: Dan on Feb 27, 2008 at 08:54 PM
    I always find it comical when the city is trying to take two steps forward and some citizens represented by many posters below want the city to take one step back. Considering the CWS is truly the only tourist attraction in Omaha with casinos voted down and an amusement park to compete with Worlds of Fun also voted down, it would be economic suicide to not try to keep the CWS in Omaha for the next twenty years. Raise taxes to keep the CWS in Omaha, or raise taxes if we lose the CWS. I would rather pay taxes to keep the CWS. Besides the Qwest Center events (many of you probably opposed this also), Huskers, and CWS, this town and state is rather boring. I think from the posts below many Nebraskans want to keep it boring. Don't get me wrong, I love living in Nebraska and I am born and raised here but not much to do for a mid-size city.
    Posted by: kevin on Feb 27, 2008 at 08:52 PM
    Drew... Speak for yourself. If my property taxes go up because of some shortfall in the Fahey plan, who's going to take accountability. What is the plan to compensate the loss of keno revenue to the county? Fahey declined to answer this. Only one way..... raise your property tax.
    Posted by: Kati on Feb 27, 2008 at 08:52 PM
    "This is the day I've been waiting for", says the mayor. The Downtown location(s) would be ok, except - the numbers, as expected, are very shakey. They'll never get the Naming Rights at that amount, 70% of the Parking already goes to the City to pay for Qwest Center's lots (and the amnount of parking will be reduced!!) so forget that piece, Personal Seat Licenses just for the CWS (come on!), $50k average for suites in Omaha (please!!), plus the expected attendance from Creighton (maybe) and the Royals (no way, they're leaving!!!) are tied to seat tax revenues. There are way too many holes in way too many stadium revenue sources for this "plan" to fly. Nice job consultants. Also, "the experts" put a very weak effort into the basic thought process of renovating Rosenblatt - disappointing! Stinson said it a couple of times - the Zoo will be the beneficiary - which is OK, just say so up front. Now they need to fix ALL the revenue sources big time. "This" is what he wa waiting for???
    Posted by: Lacie on Feb 27, 2008 at 08:44 PM
    Impeach Fahey--- he's costing the city money not improving it. Mark my words... Taxes will be raised to all not just what's stated to Hotels/motels etc...
    Posted by: M on Feb 27, 2008 at 08:44 PM
    What about the contaminated soil on the Qwest property? We were told it would go undisturbed to protect our environment and in order to be allowed to save money on the initial Qwest development, the city made an agreement with the EPA to only use it as a parking lot.
    Posted by: Steven on Feb 27, 2008 at 08:32 PM
    As stinson put it, one of the revenue streams will be PREMIUM income, AKA, push the long time local supporter of the CWS out of their seats and now comes PSL's and sold to the highest bidder! I have no problem with the American Free Enterprise system! (get what the market will bear), but I do have a problem with people who manipulate the numbers to their benefit! Ken Lay,Bernie Ebbers,and throw in Richard Nixon for good measure as top notch scammers!!! So to you folks that HAD supported the CWS for years and had those Great seats,Pony up or get in line for the few general admission seats or maybe those seats will be gobbled up by the fahay pawns!!! If old buildings are worthless why does the south part of downtown preserve history! One would see a BIG double standard or does kiewit need some Omaha public money business.Sorry Hawkins!
    Posted by: Scott on Feb 27, 2008 at 08:29 PM
    The problem is with Mike Fahey. Mike does not have the personality or thought that normal citzens have. He's a multi millionair thanks to Wells Fargo. He said he would protect and defend his right to take Elkhorn (not try and sell Elkhorn on this process) and had in his mind to build the stadium downtown no matter what the cost. Mike, not all of us sold a business or $2 million and watched it grow to $40 million.
    Posted by: Scott on Feb 27, 2008 at 08:25 PM
    Does anyone remember when a lot of people were against the building of the Qwest Center? They said, "we have the Civic Auditorium, why would we need the Qwest Center?" These same people are back! Let's move forward with the smart and visionary plans to build downtown!
    Posted by: karen on Feb 27, 2008 at 08:25 PM
    this is nothing less than communism. the so called mayor didn't let the good citizens of the city vote. what happened to democracy? let him answer that qyestion, along with a whole lot more people have to ask and say to him!!!
    Posted by: Patricia on Feb 27, 2008 at 08:16 PM
    With gas going up to $4 per gallon, only the rich will be able to go to the new stadium. But then again, it is Faheys' hand picked rich elete committee that decided we need a new stadium. The rich get richer, the poor get poorer. Us poor folks are allowed to voice our opposition. That will be left up to the City Council and I pray they will vote no! What we don't need now is more debt for Omaha.
    Posted by: Concerned on Feb 27, 2008 at 08:10 PM
    Have we all forgotten that there is contaminated soil on this land capped with concrete parking lots in order to save money on the Qwest to begin with. This city's leaders at that time told the citizens we had nothing to worry about with this soil being present on site because it would always be a capped parking lot. There is a EPA document dated October 2007 which states the terms of a covenant on prohibiting the use of this property which states "Because there was waste left in place, there are covenants on the property restricting the type of use, prohibiting use as a day care, preschool, playground, athletic field, picnic ground, dormitory, or nursing home." This can be found by googling the search terms qwest center omaha construction epa. The document is a pdf titled Union Pacific-Omaha, in this document titled Union Pacific / Omaha Convention (Qwest) Center on page two bottom paragraph the covenant is defined. This will raise the cost of this project, but it is unaddressed.
    Posted by: CWS on Feb 27, 2008 at 08:07 PM
    Great day for Omaha! Keep it up!!!
    Posted by: joel on Feb 27, 2008 at 07:59 PM
    Why is the mayor afraid to put this up for a vote? This thing will never come in on budget and Fahey knows it. We are still paying for the QWEST center,and another big money project is beyond our means.
    Posted by: Jeff on Feb 27, 2008 at 07:59 PM
    Quality of life costs money. The Qwest Center was expensive and highly contested by the backward looking conservatives in this city and it has far exceeded expectations despite not luring as many large conventions as projected. This stadium will do the same. It will improve the quality of life, it will improve the event and may even make it more profitable in the future. Those that don't want the mony spent now will like it even less when 10 years from now we are talking about a new stadium after inveting many millions more in the Blatt. The redevelopment around this area is a catalyst for all of North Omaha and the North Downtown. Come on Omaha, get behind this and lets look to the future like so many of our great citizens and businesses do.
    Posted by: Roger on Feb 27, 2008 at 07:58 PM
    With all the homeless people in this city and streets that are filled with chuckholes. I feel the money could be better spent on other more important things then a new stadium. The Mayor needs to remove his head from you know where and do a reality check. Let some other City build a stadium Nebraska taxes are already high enough.
    Posted by: John on Feb 27, 2008 at 07:53 PM
    Now Council Bluffs can put in parking and motels across the river and Nebraska people can drive over there and park free and walk across the new bridge. The bridge will be great this summer for the Quest Center, too.
    Posted by: R Kowalski on Feb 27, 2008 at 07:49 PM
    At $2.00 a pop, how many cars are rented each day. I wouldn't think too many? A 1% raise of hotel tax might add a dollar or two per day for each rental. How many rooms are rented each day? Stadium revenue will amount to very little considering the amount of attendance of the Royals. What make Fahey think the Royal fans are going to go downtown and pay more. The consessions will probably go up. And parking will probably go up to $8.00 or $10.00, where right now it's free. And a ballpark sits idle most of the year. Keno funds are going to take a hit with this 'no smoking ban'. And as far as private funds go, is this a stair stepped funding, as long as the ballpark is making it,they'll fund it. And the most important question is, if all this of this funding and money doesn't pan out, what will happen. Will the taxpayer have to divvy up with higher property tax? Fahey needs to tell us what will happen when the stadium funding fall short. Taxes will go up, without a vote of the people
    Posted by: Confused on Feb 27, 2008 at 07:39 PM
    Top single game attendance in 2006 was over 30K, in 2007 it was just under 30K - and there is a 10 yr waiting list for tickets. This wonderful new stadium will only hold 24K and we have to be taxed above the current 140 Mil estimate to expand that capacity in the future. Shouldn't we at least start at current attendance levels for a new stadium capacity? Oh!, I forgot! The Royals want a 14K seat stadium, won't commit to a contract in a 24K seat stadium, and won't even consider playing in a 30K seat stadium. Silly me!! For a minute there, I thought this whole thing was about the needs of the CWS.
    Posted by: J on Feb 27, 2008 at 07:33 PM
    In answer to 2 questions posted: 1) Season ticket holders get to transfer their tickets. 2) Theoretically, there's enough parking w/in a 12 minute walk (no mention of how *fast* of a 12 min. walk), but they MIGHT build a parking garage next door. No $$ listed for that cost. BTW, parking goes up to $10 for CWS events, rather than the current $6. Want to bet it stays at $10? That extra parking charge will hurt Royals attendance - who, by the way, haven't committed.
    Posted by: Fred on Feb 27, 2008 at 07:25 PM
    I don't care if a new stadium is built...just as long as Creighton foots part of the bill. Especially since they will be using it all the time, irregardless as to whether or not they are hosting the CWS. Another Question: Just like they are hosting the basketball tournament in Omaha, are they also then going to give first dibs on tickets to the CWS to their own ticketholders just like they did so w/the Basketball Tournament?
    Posted by: Ben on Feb 27, 2008 at 07:21 PM
    See everyone I told you it was a done deal no matter what the taxpayers thought. Quit wasting your breath. AND what happened to that Senator Synoweicki who was to fix all this????
    Posted by: T.R. on Feb 27, 2008 at 07:19 PM
    South Omaha will start to change for the worse if this does end up happening. It's really funny how a majority of Omaha does not agree with this proposal. I really don't care if Omaha has the World Series. It seems all they want is money that's why they are staying here in Omaha. Nebraska isn't even a baseball state...Most people who live here doesn't care about baseball!!! So why should it stay here? Take it out to a city that will care. We really don't. The ones supporting this just thinks the city will grow and the zoo will take over. Won't happen. Also do we need the stadium closer to that end of the city? Many people are going to get lost over there and it's only going to become worse.
    Posted by: Anonymous on Feb 27, 2008 at 07:18 PM
    Change, change, change! Now we're getting the same sales pitch for the stadium that we're getting from Obama. It's alot easier to throw out ambiguious words then offer good reasoning. Oh well, character and substance are hard to come by these days I guess. I suppose we'll just have to settle for temporary placation.
    Posted by: Mike on Feb 27, 2008 at 07:17 PM
    What is the Mayor afraid of, for not having a public comment session any farther than Westside High School? As usual, the Mayor will only stay in his comfort zone, parts of town that support him. As usual, we in West Omaha, that have the highest property tax bills per each property, are left out of the discussion.
    Posted by: michele on Feb 27, 2008 at 07:16 PM
    to those that live in bellevue and surronding areas not be surprised if fahey does not try to get money from your towns. he will do anything to get his hands on it. he is a crook just like the rest of his "people" i am sick of the behind closed doors junk going on.
    Posted by: Anonymous on Feb 27, 2008 at 07:03 PM
    FINALLY!! A Poll to ask us what we think! THANK YOU WOWT!
    Posted by: Scott on Feb 27, 2008 at 06:55 PM
    hey i've got a great idea...take a guy from Peter Kiewit, a guy from HDR, put them on the Stadium committee and then have them explain to a moron like Fahey why THEY think we need a new stadium. At least we're not building a stupid footbridge across the river. Oh, wait...
    Posted by: HearditBefore on Feb 27, 2008 at 06:51 PM
    I have yet to see anyone present a good arguement as why we need to have the CWS here in Omaha. Aside from the fact that it's the only time of the year that the weeds and the graffitti get cleaned up in South O I could care less. Yeah, I know I keep reading that my taxes would be higher if not for the CWS. However I don't see how my taxes could be higher, or how I could be getting less for them. I say let's let the CWS leave and good riddance. Instead of building a new stadium we could use the money to clean up the graffitti and weeds all year long. There are those who say the nay-sayers will be impressed when the new stadium is done. That's what we heard about the Qwest and Jobber's Canyon. Two white elephants which still have not paid for themselves.
    Posted by: Mike on Feb 27, 2008 at 06:50 PM
    Regarding the comment from Tim who posted earlier saying that the Yankees and the Cowboys know what a new stadium means. Those teams are professional baseball teams in big cities! We are talking about a stadium that a AAA team plays in and hosts the College World series. This new stadium will sit empty for 3/4 of the year.
    Posted by: Omaha on Feb 27, 2008 at 06:44 PM
    Elkhorn fights kicking and screaming about NOT becoming apart of Omaha, now, they are screaming and yelling about a decision for Omaha?! Wow
    Posted by: Barb on Feb 27, 2008 at 06:44 PM
    Someone mentioned in an earlier post that even the NY Yankees know what a new stadium means. Well, at least the new stadium is being built RIGHT NEXT to the old one!!!! With a new stadium, concession prices will go up, there will be a seat tax and now people will have to pay to park to go to a ballgame. It will be too expensive especially since most of the working class do not get raises that keep up with rising prices. Lots from the Qwest center will be used to build this stadium which will take away some parking. The Mayor says that people will have a 12 minute walk to the Qwest. Well most people WANT to park right at the Qwest Center. I feel the Mayor has his millionaire friends convinced we need this new stadium so there is no private $$$ to renovate Rosenblatt. The new stadium won't even have the Rosenblatt name! And who is the Mayor kidding saying that property taxes won't go up. Taxes are high enough in this city and state.
    Posted by: the "minority" on Feb 27, 2008 at 06:37 PM
    wow, so many of you claim to be the majority, based on what? You need to stop making long term decisions that you are completely clueless about. You should read up on the issue, and actually have a part in that before you start screaming and yelling as if you really are the "majority". You are just the loudest.
    Posted by: J on Feb 27, 2008 at 06:37 PM
    So all those people who were quoting statistics that said 80% or 90% of people in this town opposed the new stadium, you will now learn, those were NOT TRUE. Not even 55% of people opposed it. And I'm sure plenty will finally realise how much we needed this when it's done.
    Posted by: chelsey on Feb 27, 2008 at 06:34 PM
    Everyone needs to stop trippin! Do you or dont you want the CWS here?? Our city makes so much revenue from the CWS. WE NEED THAT. Yeah, maybe the Qwest center isn't the best place but at least we can keep the CWS. Now, what i'm worried about is just to be able to drink at the CWS.
    Posted by: Response to Curious on Feb 27, 2008 at 06:32 PM
    Can I have those names of the 3 families, me and 10000's of others are just waiting for some tickets to open up. :) nice attempt, but you fail to mention the line of people who would buy those tickets and go. They probably would go for the right reasons too, not cos they feel they own something that belongs to someone else.
    Posted by: Bob on Feb 27, 2008 at 06:31 PM
    So the majority feels the CWS should leave? Those yelling and CRYING about this whole thing are saying that LOUD and CLEAR. "We don't want the millions the CWS brings in! The national exposure, the fact that people outside of this city know Omaha for the CWS, FORGET THAT! We don't want our city to grow". To the guy who said we are willing to go into debt for a shiny new car, you really need to realize how off base you are. the citizens are NOT going into debt, THEY HAVE A PLAN TO PAY FOR IT WITHOUT OUR MONEY!. READ THE DARN THING FOR CRYING OUT LOUD. But, 99% of you don't care what is said, you already know what you want. Sadly, you are the reason great cities like Omaha die all the time...
    Posted by: Anonymous on Feb 27, 2008 at 06:27 PM
    IF YOU BUILD IT, THEY WILL COME!
    Posted by: John on Feb 27, 2008 at 06:24 PM
    I can't believe those accusing anyone opposed to this plan as being against progress, growth, and change. I think you're completely missing the point. The problem with this whole situation is that Fahey and his cronies work FOR US. It's OUR money putting this thing together, (and if you think otherwise, have yourself checked), and yet Fahey actually stated he didn't feel the public had any say in this. The arrogance is astounding. And yet, some still feel we have nothing to complain about, and that it'll all be better in a few years or so? There's something drastically wrong with that thinking.
    Posted by: CWS must stay on Feb 27, 2008 at 06:22 PM
    CWS Omaha doing the right thing THAT WON'T COST THE TAX PAYERS = Omaha growing along with the CWS. To you "majority" people, you need to realize this isn't costing you, so stop acting like you control it. The NCAA has the right to do anything it chooses with the tournament IT owns, if we want the PRIVLEDGE of having it in our growing city, fine. Get over it. It's happening. say what you want, but in 5 years all of you will be outside the stadium waiting to get in or watching it on tv with a tear in your eye that Omaha will be in the spotlight for 2 solid weeks nationally. AGAIN, GET OVER IT. Simple, "we want a voice" ITS NOT YOUR CHOICE WHAT THE NCAA DOES. So GET OVER IT!
    Posted by: No on Feb 27, 2008 at 06:12 PM
    It would be interesting to know how many supporters are the same individuals who bought a big house with an ARM and now is having mortgage problems - or who buy on credit.
    Posted by: kyle on Feb 27, 2008 at 06:06 PM
    WHO CARES ABOUT THE STADIUM, TAKE MONEY AND FIX THE DAMN POT HOLES
    Posted by: Sad Day in Omaha on Feb 27, 2008 at 06:05 PM
    Fahey needs to go...
    Posted by: d on Feb 27, 2008 at 06:04 PM
    Looks like Omaha Mayor Mike Fahey is sending to much time in Washington D.C. with President Bush. He does what ever he wants too. Look for a New Stadium in the future.
    Posted by: Jack on Feb 27, 2008 at 05:57 PM
    I guess if I made as much as a mayor, or a retired police officer or fireman I might be able to go to a game once a year. But with food and gas going through the roof. Plus people losing their homes. The last thing I need to spend money on is a new ball park. Wish I was one of the RICH people that they are building this for. I just wish that the mayor would understand that all people in Omaha don't have money growing on trees in their back yards. I just don't believe he is truly looking out for all the people in this town. A mayor should look at all sides of things and not just the RICH in this city.
    Posted by: L on Feb 27, 2008 at 05:56 PM
    Traffic, taxes and now a new stadium. Where is the monsy to come from. Picking the taxpayer pockets again. Iowa here I come.
    Posted by: Caroline on Feb 27, 2008 at 05:53 PM
    I do not believe that Mr. Fahey should have been able to singlehandedley with his few friends made this decision. I used to believe he was a strong man with a moral character. I think he should feel ashamed of himself. When there are kids in Omaha unable to attend CWS games because they are too expensive. They can be sure to think of Mr. Fahey then. What a legacy. An empty ballpark :(
    Posted by: ALL FOR IT!! on Feb 27, 2008 at 05:51 PM
    GO FAHEY!!! THIS IS HUGE!! THIS IS THE BEST IDEA SINCE THE QUEST CENTER! STOP COMPLAINING, GIVE THIS A CHANCE! IF OMAHA WOULD HAVE VOTED FOR CASINO'S A FEW YEARS AGO, WE WOULD HAVE HAD PLENTY OF MONEY TO GO AROUND.... THE ZOO COULD UTILIZE ROSENBLATT LAND, WHICH COULD BE ANOTHER FEATHER IN OMAHA'S HAT. THE LAYOUT OF THE STADIUM LOOKS GREAT AND THE WALKING BRIDGE WILL NOW BE UTILIZED AS IT SHOULD. NOW ALL WE NEED IS FOR COUNCIL BLUFFS TO HELP OUT WITH THE PARKING ON THEIR SIDE. THANKS FOR MAKING OMAHA WHAT IT IS TODAY, "AN UP AND COMING CITY"!!
    Posted by: Don on Feb 27, 2008 at 05:49 PM
    I didn't like Quest, I still don't like Quest, and I won't go to anything at Quest. Parking is a nightmare, cost is rediculous, and getting there is a pain. Now, a stadium to make things even worse. Good luck taxpayers in Omaha. Don't whine when your taxes go up because the Quest can't get venue. And you're in the middle of your 50 week off season of no CWS. I'll be sitting back telling you "I Told You SO!!"
    Posted by: Bill on Feb 27, 2008 at 05:43 PM
    I smell a rat. This deal is to benefit who - Fahey, his committee and cronies. Anyone want to take a guess who the contractor will be if this deal is allowed to happen? Peter Kiewit is my guess.
    Posted by: to ted on Feb 27, 2008 at 05:41 PM
    Royals and Fahey have said that this stadium is not ideal for them, Where did you see a firm 20 year contract??? I've looked all over and have not come across an actual 20 year agreement. Show me your reference and I will look at it. Last I knew it was a possible 20 year contract, just like a possible 40 million private donations. Learn to actually read the words.
    Posted by: Ears on Feb 27, 2008 at 05:36 PM
    Wah, wah, wah, wah, wah wah..... Look over the proposal and read it all before you start whinging about taxes rising... They are going to raise taxes on things that residents of Omaha rarely, if ever use... rental cars and hotel rooms. No big deal. It would have cost everyone the same amount to upgrade Rosenblatt as it will cost us to have the brand new venue. There will be other uses for the stadium as well, such as outdoor concerts... It will work just fine. There were just as many whining about the Qwest Center when they first brought it up. I would say the Qwest Center has done quite well and I hear few/noone complaining abuot it now. Live your life and enjoy a new ballpark, it will be great.
    Posted by: David on Feb 27, 2008 at 05:32 PM
    Change is never easy. I remember all the games my father took me to and my feet weren't able to tough the ground when sitting in the stadium seat. However, days, months and years go by and things change. Now we can have a new stadium and new memories to share in the future. We can pay for it we are a larger and growing city. We will pay for it the same as the Qwest center, same as every thing else we pay for and use. I say go for it!!!
    Posted by: Drew on Feb 27, 2008 at 05:31 PM
    Right now there is a higher percentage of people who oppose the new plan for a stadium downtown. Once the project is complete I'm guessing the majority of the neigh sayers will be impressed with what has been done. Nobody likes change, especially when it costs so much, but this is a change everyone will grow to love and enjoy.
    Posted by: kevin on Feb 27, 2008 at 05:29 PM
    So when Fahey robs the Keno revenue, what happens? His hand-picked clan of brains did not have a solution to that. That must be the problem of Douglas County. In other words, our property taxes will more than likely go up.
    Posted by: Tim on Feb 27, 2008 at 05:29 PM
    First of all, I am getting tired of the whinners from Elkhorn using the baseball stadium isue to advance their anger over the annexation issue. One doesn't have anything to do with the other. I am proud of Mike Fahey's long range vision for the city. The information is now just getting out, so why not gather all the facts before opposing or supporting the new stadium Keep an open mind. Remember, Mike Fahey is the elected mayor of Omaha. I for one, voted for him because of his vision. Just like our former Mayor, Hal Daub, convinced the city that the Quest Center would be a plus for the city, I believe, when all the facts are in, the city will support the new stadium and in five or so years we will all be looking back and be glad we built the new stadium--just like we have done with the Quest Center.
    Posted by: Debbie on Feb 27, 2008 at 05:26 PM
    I think this new stadium is a joke and I do not understand where the money is coming from besides raising our taxes and espically the hotel taxes and car rental taxes. Plus I feel sorry for the people that have keno for a money maker for them and now Fahey is taking that away from the people. I think you should let the people decide if we want this new ball park but the people's choice is not in the option which is very sad. Fahey needs to move on, the city of Omaha is all about him and not what the people want and we are the ones that have to do what he wants and the heck with the people in Omaha. I say we vote on this ball park.
    Posted by: John D. on Feb 27, 2008 at 05:21 PM
    I am all for the new stadium with one big question??? What are they planning to do with the season ticket holders that have religously paid their money to the CWS for the past10-20 years?? Our tickets have been in family for 32 years and has become a tradition in our family along with the people we sit with. I am very concered that we are going to lose our seats that we have had for so long to some big corporation with big bucks. Very concerned and would like to know. Thanks.
    Posted by: Deb on Feb 27, 2008 at 05:15 PM
    I think Mayor Fahey handled this situation very badly. We do need to make sure that we keep the CWS in Omaha and I am not opposed to a new stadium, but the citizens of Omaha need to have a strong say in where the stadium is going to be built.
    Posted by: Smoke and Mirrors on Feb 27, 2008 at 05:15 PM
    I see that the mayor is counting on the Royals and Creighton kicking in over $7 million in lease payments to use the park - last I heard, neither had committed to the project and why would they?
    Posted by: Curious on Feb 27, 2008 at 05:13 PM
    Took a office poll out of curiousity (of course, it has no scientific merit) and found that 3 out of every 4 FAMILIES (who NORMALLY attend the CWS) on our floor will NOT be going to the new stadium when it opens. The reasons varied from A) can't afford it now that it's downtown. B) No parking will be available C) THE CWS IS ALREADY IN HD. D) Don't like it being shoved down my throat. But the one that repeated the most was E) Wasn't invited in the planning, won't be supporting it. If that translates to revenue dollars, Fahey's Folley is ALREADY a BUST and we are screwed paying for his 'VISION'. The same 3 to 1 ratio is also in favor of a RECALL vote as well. RECALL FAHEY BEFORE IT'S TOO LATE!!
    Posted by: Ted on Feb 27, 2008 at 05:13 PM
    Why is it so hard for the people in this community to look forward. This proposal is the best thing for all involved,CWS,Zoo, and the Omaha Royals as well as Creighton. Any other city would jump at the chance to sign a 20 year agreement with the NCAA with the amount of money this brings into a community. Come on Omaha use your head. Thank You Mayor.
    Posted by: T on Feb 27, 2008 at 05:12 PM
    Does this include the cost or replacing the lost 900 parking stalls, or is the mayor hiding the true cost of the project by separating that out?
    Posted by: To Mark S on Feb 27, 2008 at 05:11 PM
    People like you are what makes others in the USA think we are "corn country". We are not thought of "corn country" in many places. So what, American Idol showed a corn field - that doesn't make America think of us that way - get over it. We have major corporations that that world renowned. Also, many don't want to pay for something they can't afford duh!
    Posted by: JJ on Feb 27, 2008 at 05:11 PM
    Traffic is already a nightmare. I dont see any traffic improvements in their proposals
    Posted by: County resident on Feb 27, 2008 at 05:09 PM
    Why do I have to pay for this - what right does the city have to take the Keno money from the county?
    Posted by: To those who think on Feb 27, 2008 at 05:08 PM
    To those of you who think that the opposers of the new stadium are not for progress. I have seen Omaha grow for a long time. I did vote to have the Qwest Center, I saw Jobbers Canyon change to Conagra, so just because I don't support the new stadium DOESN'T mean I am opposed to change. I could make an assumption and say that all of you are willing to go into debt just to have a brand new shiny car - which is what Omaha will be doing with the new stadium. It's about what can be afforded and this is not affordable. We have a huge Sewer project, Pension shortfall and a rise in the crime rate (all over omaha).
    Posted by: T on Feb 27, 2008 at 05:08 PM
    Doesn't Qwest already own the naming rights to the Qwest Center property? How can they sell the naming rights twice?
    Posted by: M on Feb 27, 2008 at 05:02 PM
    In another location, Fahey said "he did not know the zoo's stand on this" so how can they say the land will be for Zoo expansion. Also when asked about the city council support he stated I'm confident. As we move forward on this process, there are added advantages to Rosenblatt area. (We currently see) erosion in south neighborhoods. Secondly, we don't know what plans are for zoo. We'll continue with the help of everyone here to get facts out to the city of Omaha." I intend to go to those meetings and I am so angered by Fahey and his wishes to get a new stadium. Honestly, if the community doesn't support a new stadium, don't you think the attitude towards the CWS will change?
    Posted by: tim on Feb 27, 2008 at 04:58 PM
    South Omaha is getting the short end of the stick on this deal. Downtown Omaha has already got the Qwest center and now they are taken away the CWS. The city Council and the mayor need to be fair to all parts of Omaha not just the down town in order to improve the City of Omaha as a whole. All areas need to be treated equal with opportunities to attract new business and improve infrastructure and property value. The Mayer needs to take a ride in his Limo and look and the deterioration of other parts of the City. There is alot more than just downtown.
    Posted by: Dale on Feb 27, 2008 at 04:57 PM
    TO Reality...Why do we HAVE to keep the CWS? Will the city go bankrupt? I doubt it yes they will raise taxes just as they do every year to pay for something that few get to use and when it is used will only be used for 2 weeks..and by creighton(which I still have not heard what they are required to pay)
    Posted by: mark on Feb 27, 2008 at 04:56 PM
    I support you Mayor Fahey all the way. Your plan is great!!
    Posted by: 23 years-old on Feb 27, 2008 at 04:51 PM
    Regarding the baseball stadium proposal released today: Once again, we have taxation without representation. I would like to see the College World Series stay in Omaha for many years to come...but how is it ok to ignore basic democratic principles in our efforts to retain the CWS? What do the people of Omaha really think about the location and financing of the stadium? Where do the members of the Omaha City Council, people who were elected to represent the People, stand on the issue?
    Posted by: Mark S on Feb 27, 2008 at 04:48 PM
    I live in douglas county and will be happy to pay a few more dollars every year for this, much better than the money I pay to park in someones front yard every year. I hope everyone on here who says they are moving out of Omaha, actually does so! You are what keeps Omaha on the map as corn country, all good things come at a cost. The mayor has come up with a way that will pay for this and not overburden the average family. If you do not want to pay for it then do not rent a car, a hotel room or go to the games. I am sure every ticket will still be sold. Keep developing Omaha Mr. Fahey I appreciate the jobs it creates, the tax revenue, and the idea that I can have anything a bigger city has and still afford to live in a nice house that is not over priced and get anywhere in town in 20 minutes. I also hope Kiewit gets the contract, that's just more of my neighbors and friends that will be getting regular paychecks and helping pay the taxes around here IN OMAHA!
    Posted by: RC on Feb 27, 2008 at 04:47 PM
    This looks like a great plan. Having the stadium downtown near the hotels and restaraunts will make it more convenient. The Qwest Center never booked any events during the CWS anyway, so the parking issue is reduced. Now the Qwest Center can book CWS related events that people can walk to from the stadium. A win-win for everyone.I think it is time for South Omaha to realize the potential for a year round facility at the Rosenblatt site, not a two week event. I also think the MECA Board better get behind this proposal. I have a say in electing the Mayor and Council. As far as I know, I have NO say in the appointment of the MECA Board. If I did, I would be voting THEM out, not Fahey, for their childish grandstanding. Come on Omaha, lots of you were against the Qwest Center and see how that has blossomed the Downtown area. The new stadium will be great for Omaha, too. Oh, by the way, I have never been to a CWS game.
    Posted by: Aaron on Feb 27, 2008 at 04:43 PM
    Maybe Mayor Fahey's proposed method of paying for this should include a new NEBRASKA casino. That would be one surefire way to pay for this without speculation. Look at Iowa's growth compared to Nebraska. Casinos may have their negatives, but as it has been pointed out several times in the past, casinos are across the river. I do not go to them, however, at the same time, I am no more likely to go to a casino in downtown Omaha than in CB, point being, if you are a casino goer from Omaha, you will go to CB so why not keep the money in Nebraska.
    Posted by: Pam on Feb 27, 2008 at 04:39 PM
    What an unbelievable joke! Fahey is a crook. He hand selected his committee of co-horts in crime. WHAT IS WRONG with the citizens of our fair city? If what we "hear" is the general sentiment, that the majority of citizens/taxpayers DO NOT WANT this - DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT. I'm a taxpaying citizen of Omaha. Where are our rights? It's time we unite and stop these egomaniacal crooks. Prime location...yeah, this NoDo buzzword crap - it's a smokescreen for yet another Creighton venue. Fr Schlegel and CU have their hands so far down the back pockets of the leaders of this city it's disgusting. Like others have said, with today's economy, with all the people that need help in our community and this is where Fahey hangs his hat? Crooks, liars, big business....simple truth is, these people are for themselves and themselves only.
    Posted by: Omaha on Feb 27, 2008 at 04:35 PM
    I have a feeling that this supposed great & grand baseball stadium is just not going to work out. Yep! Just like Rosenblatt didn't; if you know what I mean. They are going to spend alot of money, and for what? More money! It might work that way for awhile & benefit a few- but in the long run I think it will come back to haunt & bite them. Yes, I think the so-called baseball enthusiasts should have taken the hint to build it elsewhere. The `River Front was & is a very special place if not for just the handicap of it being a potential flood-plain. The River Front should have held a whole lot more of a glorious future than to have become the home to `Big Business Interests. Well, that's the way the cookie crumbles. People will see Omaha's River Front for what it is- and then move. Baseball? And Baseball Stadium? Yeah, right! It reeks of a minority investment. The old stadium & surrounding areas had its troubles, so too will this one. What would God have there? Freedom, Beauty & Peace!
    Posted by: Thomas on Feb 27, 2008 at 04:34 PM
    How are they going to present to the NCAA that Omaha is in favor of this. There wont be any vote, it will be twisted numbers saying Omaha wants this. A new stadium would be nice but this day and age of high taxes, I dont really want it. Help ease the tax burden on the people of Omaha and maybe it can happen. Why is the word "TAX" becoming such an easy word for these politicians? They take, take and take but never give. This world is going to the dogs folks. I bet any amount of money that PK gets the bid on this job.
    Posted by: a on Feb 27, 2008 at 04:32 PM
    I will not go to the Royal's games or the CWS. The magic & tradition is gone. The Qwest is great but I haven't seen my property taxes go down from all this generated revenue.
    Posted by: Rob on Feb 27, 2008 at 04:32 PM
    128 million, I thought it was 140 million for the new stadium. I bet it will be closer to 200 million. Recall the Mayor.
    Posted by: Deb on Feb 27, 2008 at 04:30 PM
    I agree that the CWS needed something outside of Rosenblatt, it's too small. My issue is we shouldn't be building something down town. Why beat a dead horse??? AS long as we don't have an international airport in this state we're not going to see anything bigger then the CWS. They should have built it out closer to Elkhorn. I think building it down town where they will be land locked yet again is the biggest issue. Why did they spend all that money on the updates to the current park just to turn it into a parking lot a few years later. They need to start building these things thinking of the future...not trying to build up a run-down part of town. I also don't agree with how sneaky he's been. He should have been more open and honest with the people this is going to effect the most...the people in the community. He sure won't be footing the bill. He should have had more fund raisers for this after the last contact was signed. This is not a surprise people, We knew it was going to come.
    Posted by: Jess on Feb 27, 2008 at 04:27 PM
    People need to stop and think for a minute. The CWS is a big reason why people even know where Omaha is. It's a part of our history and personally I don't want to lose it. The CWS has been here for almost 60 years. Why should it move just because it will cost us a little to build. When Rosenblatt was built in 1947 it cost money to build then as well. Stop being so selfish for once. If people continue to debate the issue and make Fahey jump through hoops, we will lose the CWS, that is a promise the NCAA has made. Build the stadium, deal with how we have to pay for it and get over it. It has to stay here.
    Posted by: KT on Feb 27, 2008 at 04:27 PM
    Are the residents of Omaha this pathetic? I gave up reading the comments because I was getting so annoyed! Are you the same people that complained about Qwest Center? Why don't you want to see your city progress? Why stay in a rut? Get over it!
    Posted by: Sandra on Feb 27, 2008 at 04:22 PM
    Here here Pat. I agree with you 100%. Those of us that don't go will still have to pay for the new park. And what are they going to do if say there is a concert at the Qwest the same time the CWS is on??? They will be hurting for parking if that happens. I hope to move to Texas in a couple more years and get out of this Tax me state.
    Posted by: Don on Feb 27, 2008 at 04:22 PM
    Send your comments to pmr@ncaa.org. That's the public relations people for NCAA. Let them know what your feelings are. Maybe they will have respect for the Omaha taxpayers.
    Posted by: Bergi on Feb 27, 2008 at 04:21 PM
    Everyone who is against this idea needs to stop and take a deep breath. You are probably some of the same individuals who did not want Omaha to build the Qwest Center, and we see now how wrong you were about that. Omaha needs to keep growing and spend money to make it. Omaha must continue to expand facilities that will grab young peoples attention. Many who don't support this are OLD and comfortable with what they have known for years. This is not about them it is about the youth and building a new look of Omaha and this can further that.
    Posted by: MIchael on Feb 27, 2008 at 04:17 PM
    Guess what OMAHA?! THOSE PRIVATE FUNDS MENTIONED ARE NOT YET SECURE (they are oral promises only and definitely NOT cast in cement)!! THAT MEANS THERE IS NO ACTUAL PRIVATE $$$ IN HAND DEDICATED TO FAHEY'S FOLLEY! WE WILL BE PAYING FOR THE NO-DO AREA FOR DECADES TO COME AND IN MORE WAYS THAN ONE. THIS NIGHTMARE KEEPS GETTING WORSE. RECALL FAHEY!!
    Posted by: Michelle on Feb 27, 2008 at 04:08 PM
    Anyone who thinks property taxes will not ultimately go up if this stadium is built is crazy. Omaha has such a hard time getting business to locate here for a variety of reasons, taxes being one of them. This will not help. Face it a new stadium with a low rate minor league team is just not that cool.
    Posted by: Shame!!!! on Feb 27, 2008 at 04:06 PM
    Yep, Fahey has washed his hands of it and now the county will end up looking like the bad guy for raising taxes.
    Posted by: kim on Feb 27, 2008 at 04:05 PM
    Tell me this : isnt it against CWS rules for a college team to have home field advantage ? If the "new" stadium is Creightons home field, thats not fair to other college teams !
    Posted by: Pat on Feb 27, 2008 at 04:01 PM
    I watched the news conference on the tube. But no where did I here just what this is going to cost the average person in this town. Just what is this going to do for a person living on a fixed income (like me)? Plus what are Royal fans going to think about paying to park for the first time. I can't afford to go to the Qwest now and have never been there. Now a Royals game will be out of reach for me. Let's face it the Qwest and this ballpark, will be used by a rich minority of the people in this city. I say let them pay for it. I shouldn't have to, if I don't use them.
    Posted by: South on Feb 27, 2008 at 04:01 PM
    I know I contribute so little to the local economy, except a couple times of the year, when I get to roll out the red carpet for our guests. During that time I spend $400-$500 for meals/refreshments and donate FREE parking as long as it is available and greet everyone with genuine hospitality. And that is what is going to be missing in the new venue, no warm intimate contact between the Omaha PUBLIC and the CWS ticket holders. This will be replaced with COLD commercialism and calculated smiles. It's all about the DOLLAR now, which is NOT the original intent when the 'Blatt was built. Remember? The 'Blatt WAS a place where the kids played without CORPORATE GREED or interference, simply to play. This is honestly the SADDEST day Omaha has ever had.
    Posted by: reality on Feb 27, 2008 at 03:59 PM
    i see a lot of people speaking without knowledge, and without any clue about the real world. Shame shame shame. You all need to shut up, and realize Omaha has to keep the CWS, and if we listened to your ideas, we'd lose it.
    Posted by: Tim on Feb 27, 2008 at 03:48 PM
    Thank you Mayor Fahey for not capitulating to the dinosaurs who wish to see this city stuck in the 1960s for the next 100 years. Your plan for a new ballpark is very exciting. It is long overdue and I support you all the way!
    Posted by: Andi on Feb 27, 2008 at 03:48 PM
    The mayor said that the funding would come from "a variety of sources". I think the number of sources will be around 400,000. At least I think that is the approximate population of Omaha. I moved out of Douglas County last year and now enjoy all the extra money I have since I am no longer paying those outrageous taxes. My property valuation is higher now that when I lived in Douglas County yet my property taxes are about 30% of what they are in Douglas county.
    Posted by: Don on Feb 27, 2008 at 03:47 PM
    Just got off the website. No surprise that it has no space for any taxpayer comments.
    Posted by: What a liar on Feb 27, 2008 at 03:47 PM
    Fahey LIE from this press conference: "we formed the review committee to look at all options, including Rosenblatt". Thats a total lie and everyone knows he didnt form this committee untilAFTER he already said he wanted a downtown stadium. Then STACKED the deck with people who only care about downtown interests. Omaha, I dont care about Rosenblatt, I do care that this mayor has REPEATEDLY lie to you! Where do I sign my Recal-Fahey petition.
    Posted by: Maria on Feb 27, 2008 at 03:41 PM
    Taxation without representation, a little unconstitutional don't ya think? I agree, taking away parking from quest center, a year round cash cow, for a two week event. Well thought out Fahey. This town is so corrupted. I can't wait to get out of this city!
    Posted by: Mourning on Feb 27, 2008 at 03:39 PM
    Say GOODBYE to a dear old friend, the faithful memories must be cheap. For the KING has declared her dead, no more than a dusty old heap. Wasn't it only just yesterday when the ESPN terms used were SPECTACULAR, HISTORIC and GRAND? Too bad those past comparisons interfered with the KING's sinister plan. So this year, before they tear her down, take a moment to reflect. How this GRAND lady has kept her dignity and commanded such deep respect. The likes of her will NEVER ever be seen again, this you can be sure. Where kids played simply for the love of the game, only fond memories will endure. I will make no predictions if the KING's plan will work even out. But someone should remind him what the CWS was REALLY all about. It wasn't about a stupid 25 year deal and a stadium nobody wants. It was about the kids, playing with HONEST zeal in front of all of us. Rest In Peace, ol' girl, you will be sorely missed by those who actually understand what a legacy truely is. Thanx!
    Posted by: B on Feb 27, 2008 at 03:39 PM
    This is the worst idea ever! We'll never have great artists come to the Qwest Center now and even if we do traffic is going to SUCK because what if there is a game and a concert the same days...has anyone thought of the MAJOR TRAFFIC JAMS THIS IS GOING TO CAUSE???!@?!?!? Of course not...that would be thinking ahead...
    Posted by: Tim on Feb 27, 2008 at 03:39 PM
    so when CSW is gone and then the Royals you all can find something to complain about like paying off the remaining Rosenblatt Debt without any income source...Oh and by the way, How many people does the CWS bring to Omaha in a year? how many hotel rooms does that fillup? That number of rooms multiplied by the 15% hotel tax is planned for debt payment....now when you have x number of empty rooms x the 15% there is going to be a short fall...how do you think that is going to be paid for...How much sales tax revenue do you think Omaha receives from out-of-town visitors for CWS. That is paying some bill somewhere....Where do you think that shortfall is going to come from......Wake up...When we are watching the CWS in Indiannapolis...you nasayers will have plenty of time to paint your toe nails.
    Posted by: Tim on Feb 27, 2008 at 03:37 PM
    So the lying and manipulations continue. Only 127 million? What about the cost of the EPA Cleanup of the ground under Lots C & E? As I recall when the Qwest was built, the city saved money by agreeing to cover that particular piece of ground (the old UP repair yard) and NEVER build on it. So add another 20 to 30 million to the price tag. Also a "once in a lifetime" opportunity for the Henry Doorly, PLEASE! Lee Simmons is on record as having stated that the Zoo has no use for the Rosenblatt land or the funds to do anything with it. Please Omaha, step up and help stop this MADNESS before the bill comes and gets shoved down our throats along with the plea that it is our responsibility to pay to the stadium so we can keet the CWS another 50 years!
    Posted by: Glen on Feb 27, 2008 at 03:35 PM
    Recall Fahey
    Posted by: Don on Feb 27, 2008 at 03:33 PM
    There you go Omaha taxpayers. The head of the commitee tells you, the billpayers, that your input wasn't important. Who else would just go out and spend money, but not see if the person paying, wants to spend it. You got one way out. Contact NCAA by phone, letter, email, or whatever it takes, and tell them that you don't want them here. Tell them in no uncertain terms, to take it somewhere else. Then see if this stadium gets built. Let them know that Fahey is out of control building his own taxpayers paid legend. The comittee says they need a contract for 20 years. But I ask, what after that? They move and we're stuck with an empty building, and no parking?
    Posted by: Go Fahey ! on Feb 27, 2008 at 03:32 PM
    Build it and they will come. I can't wait for this stadium ! Yeah !!
    Posted by: Mark on Feb 27, 2008 at 03:30 PM
    This is ridiculous can we sign a pettition? This should have to be a public vote not a Fahey decision. Mark my words, this is going to hurt Nebraska, BAD.
    Posted by: Smoke & Mirrors on Feb 27, 2008 at 03:30 PM
    Sure Mayor Fahey, you're not going to raise property taxes. Just "reallocate" keno proceeds and force Douglas County to do it on your behalf. We really didn't expect anything less.
    Posted by: Julie on Feb 27, 2008 at 03:27 PM
    Let's go for it-- this plan looks great! It's a winning situation for our world-class zoo to expand as well. I'll miss the old Rosenblatt, but this proposal looks like a great (yet expensive) addition to the city.
    Posted by: Tom on Feb 27, 2008 at 03:27 PM
    Fahey should be run out of town for this.
    Posted by: b on Feb 27, 2008 at 03:26 PM
    Great vision our city has. Many complained about the Qwest. What a great thing that has been for Omaha. Those complaining about building a new ball park would complain as well when their taxes go up due to the loss of revenue from the college world series not being here. Can't please everyone. Glad to see that Omaha is willing to compete and win against the likes of Orlando/Disney area and all that it has to offer. Glad to be a part of Omaha! (used to be Elkhorn but that is a different story)
    Posted by: jj on Feb 27, 2008 at 03:25 PM
    Think again Dave, maybe Fahey will anex Bellevue.. ever think of that?
    Posted by: Chris on Feb 27, 2008 at 03:21 PM
    This is a bad idea. Take away parking from Qwest raise taxes for an event that is 7 days out of the year. Yeah real smart. Rosenblatt is fine.
    Posted by: cliff on Feb 27, 2008 at 03:19 PM
    I used to live in Omaha, I got out because of the taxes, crime, and your egotistical mayor. Maybe the Mayor should take the 128 million and use it to fight crime and repair Omaha's worthless streets, a new stadium what a joke, have fun Omaha taxpayer when your taxes go up to pay for it. Glad I'm gone from your high tax city!!!!
    Posted by: J on Feb 27, 2008 at 03:18 PM
    I forgot how intelligent the citizens of Omaha are. I love reading this website, because that makes me think about it all over agian. Hmm... Recalling Fahey is going to end up in court, so therefore, we would be wasting more tax money. Plus, on top of that, the stadium problem would be fixed and done with before the even went to court. Think logically. The zoo had recommented and wants the property - read more. I don't think that the people who are against this new stadium have been to Rosenblatt in the past 5 years - the place is garbage and should be tanked.
    Posted by: John on Feb 27, 2008 at 03:18 PM
    I'm surprised this $@#^&*# didn't also ask to have the stadium named after himself as part of this proposal. If I lived in this town, I would be ticked. We have been to the CWS many times and one of the biggest things we like about going there is the current stadium and it's location. It feels like small town USA. You don't have the big city all around yet the amenities are all readily available. I can honestly say that if this *#^%$@&$ pulls this thing off and the CWS moves downtown, there will be one less family attending the CWS in years to come. The current stadium and the current atmosphere is why the CWS is so successful. Move it downtown and the CWS will be no better than if it were hosted in any other city.
    Posted by: D on Feb 27, 2008 at 03:15 PM
    I am glad I am out of Omaha. When will the pillaging cease? This will cost more than $140 million by the time Fahey-Field is dedicated because of "unexpected" cost overruns and city tax payers will be on the hook for more of the funding. The NCAA should pay for some of this unneeded ballpark if they have to have it so badly. All of this waste of money for two weeks of also-ran baseball played with softball bats. If Fahey's heist went before a public vote it would lose badly. This certainly is a prime example of taxation without representation.
    Posted by: D on Feb 27, 2008 at 03:12 PM
    Well, Fahey must have gone back into "secret" mode - the website that is suppose to display the proposal is "out of order" - maybe one of Fahey's many cronies is in charge. Mr. Fahey - you'd better have your resume in order. Betcha he doesn't have the gumption to address the concerns voiced over his caster oil stadium (take it - it's good for you).
    Posted by: Susan on Feb 27, 2008 at 03:11 PM
    I am not one of those 99.3% that Mayor Fahey has said would come on board after I hear the details! It's not that I don't want Omaha to move forward. While it has been great having the CWS here I am getting tired of being told that we have to do this and that or the CWS will leave Omaha. There is life after the CWS. I can barely afford the taxes on my house as it is now and you know that the public is going to be expected to "pick up the slack" if costs exceed estimates. (Which they invariably do). With the exception of "private" funding none of the funding resources have a guaranteed amount from year to year. Those sources all depend on variables that change from one year to the next. The only guarantee is that we the taxpayers are going to end up footing the bill just as we will with the Qwest Center. So thank you, Mayor Fahey, I once again will have to pay for something that I have no say about and can't afford to attend.
    Posted by: Bent over on Feb 27, 2008 at 03:10 PM
    I wonder how many of the comittee member's companies will gain from this (Kiewit Const.)? Hopefully they will not be able to bid on the job due to the conflict of interest.....wait a minute....Fahey doesn't understand that concept. Never mind. The rich get richer.
    Posted by: Dennis on Feb 27, 2008 at 03:08 PM
    There is no possible way I would buy any property in Omaha now. Who wants to buy when future taxes are unknown. Council Bluffs looks very attractive in how they do things as far as bringing in big businesses like Google to the city. I myself have to retire some day and think it will be unaffordable to live in Omaha.
    Posted by: ryan on Feb 27, 2008 at 03:06 PM
    i think they are making a big mistake, we have a good ball park as is and now all the people that own bars and places to eat while the cws is going on , if they build a new ball park it will be the end for them because the only real busniess they get is when the cws comes to town
    Posted by: Cathy on Feb 27, 2008 at 03:06 PM
    I just don't see 2 things: 1 - Mayor Fahey being re-elected 2 - The college world series paying for the new stadium. Seems that's all that's going to use it. I heard from the very beginning, it was already a done deal. The Zoo had commented that they were not interested in Rosenblatt - but I think that's a "done deal" also.
    Posted by: Susan on Feb 27, 2008 at 03:05 PM
    I would do whatever it takes to keep the CWS in Omaha and continue the tradition. If we lose it then it will become Mike Faheys legacy.
    Posted by: Mike F on Feb 27, 2008 at 03:02 PM
    This idea is great!! Rosenblatt is old and moldy, a new stadium would help Omaha become more like Kansas City and less like des moines. Fahey has the vision!!!
    Posted by: Terry on Feb 27, 2008 at 03:02 PM
    Good name would be Fahey's Folley!
    Posted by: Breeze Grove on Feb 27, 2008 at 03:02 PM
    It's a shame this kind of effort and funding isn't put into improving our infrastructure. We would be driving on heated streets of GOLD.
    Posted by: Michael on Feb 27, 2008 at 03:01 PM
    Folks, the next step is to TELL the City Council that we don't have ANY available funds for this project which is truthfully "IN THE BEST INTEREST OF OMAHA". We don't want the stadium and we will NOT be coerced into paying for it because it's what CWS INC (not directly related to the CWS or the NCAA, they simply manage the use of the stadium for the NCAA) has recommended. I truely dislike the way that folks who aren't giving up their hard earned $$$, get a god-like voice in how to spend it, it's totally UN-AMERICAN and needs to changed. So, just say NO! (and make sure your City Council rep echoes YOUR VOICE) when they start looking for handouts. It's time to STEP UP TO THE PLATE OMAHA, just don't put anything in it! NO FINANCING WITHOUT A PUBLIC VOTE!! RECALL FAHEY!
    Posted by: Bellevue Dave on Feb 27, 2008 at 03:00 PM
    I am so glad my taxes won't be paying for this sham.
    Posted by: Kanaisha on Feb 27, 2008 at 03:00 PM
    Interesting. People are struggling with high gas costs, mortgage problems, credit card problems and heating bills with it being winter and your city's mayor decides that your city needs a new baseball stadium. This money for a stadium that is being built only for the CWS could be much better spent in helping people pay their heating bills or electrical bills, provide food and shelter for the homeless and more funding for the animal shelters and it's going to a baseball stadium. Truly your Mayor Fahey and his cohorts are governing only for their own interests and not the people they were supposedly elected to represent. I feel sorry for those whose taxes are going to be raised yet again.
    Posted by: Mark on Feb 27, 2008 at 02:59 PM
    Sounds like those with some money can be in luxury watching poor college athletes,in facilities mostly paid for by the overtaxed citizens.Ahh- the power of Big Business and capitalism!
    Posted by: midtown on Feb 27, 2008 at 02:59 PM
    why build a stadium thats smaller then what you still owe 9 million on?
    Posted by: m on Feb 27, 2008 at 02:58 PM
    I will make sure the name Fahey is one I will not vote for in the next election, who wants a new stadium anyway, he is the only one. Wake up Fahey, the stadium you have is enough, people don't want to pay for your pet projects anymore. Leave well enough alone.
    Posted by: Me on Feb 27, 2008 at 02:57 PM
    Get over it! Most of you sound like my 5 year old when she doesn't get exactly what she wants. If it went your way, the CWS wouldn't be coming back to Omaha after the contract expires. Then you'd whine about that and say Fahey didn't do enought to keep it here.
    Posted by: Ted on Feb 27, 2008 at 02:57 PM
    Nice, touch Fahey. Take the keno money away from Douglas county and make the county raise the taxes! Can't blame you for raising taxes, directly...He just happen to hit the first domino!
    Posted by: anonymus on Feb 27, 2008 at 02:56 PM
    How considerate of the mayor to go ahead and plan for a new stadium without at least putting it to a special vote for the citizens of Omaha. If I've heard it correctly reported, 95% of the people are not in favor of a new stadium, or at least not on the Qwest site. Thanks to the mayor, we are now going to get to pay higher taxes, more construction back up and delays, more traffic congestion, and less parking at any venue event at the Qwest center until they get a garage built to house the lost parking and additional that will be needed for the ballpark.
    Posted by: joe on Feb 27, 2008 at 02:54 PM
    tax,tax,tax i,m cant take it no more i,m moving to iowa
    Posted by: Fed Up on Feb 27, 2008 at 02:53 PM
    I can see it now, Fahey will get his wish. The taxpayers will have to foot the bill without a say. Fahey won't be the next mayor. How about a 'community investment' from Mr. Buffet. They could call it 'Diamond Park' and invest Microsoft capital into the stadium.
    Posted by: Sandy on Feb 27, 2008 at 02:53 PM
    Surprise, surprise he got what he wanted as usually and now guess who is going to pay for it!!!!
    Posted by: sad omaha citizen on Feb 27, 2008 at 02:50 PM
    FAHEY sure does like doing what fahey wants and not what the citizens of omaha want. first elkhon annex now this. Here is what I want fahey!!!!! not vote for you in the next election.
    Posted by: Tyler on Feb 27, 2008 at 02:50 PM
    Oh deal with it we are going to be able to walk to the game without almost being run over on over crowded streets, this way the CWS will stay here not leave because no one but omaha vendors want it here this is a great day to be a REAL baseball fan
    Posted by: S on Feb 27, 2008 at 02:49 PM
    Would you all prefer to keep Nebraska in the dark ages the way the rest of the country perceives us? We DO NOT still ride in horse & buggies. Yes - it costs money to keep good venues here in Omaha. Let's move into the 21st century & realize that we do need all the tourist money we can get. We don't have a lot of other interests that draw people in from other parts of the country. SUPPORT the CWS & your mayor. Quit whining.
    Posted by: Katie on Feb 27, 2008 at 02:48 PM
    Other than the public funding, the rest is all imanginary money today. Give us hard facts, not promo agency dreams. Who estimated the 12 min walk from parking to stadium? Is that from the furthest parking or gate to gate? I know this is a done deal, but I still have questions regarding the impact on Omaha residents who will have to foot the bill when the imaginary funding doesn't come through.
    Posted by: ANONYMOUS on Feb 27, 2008 at 02:44 PM
    The people that run the Qwest Center said that they will fight the new stadium being built in their parking lots. Does the cost for the stadium include the impending court costs for the ensuing battle with the Qwest Center? I'm not against a new stadium. I'm against the sneaky way it is coming about. I don't go to the college world series. I prefer to watch the games from the comfort of my couch. Why take a place that is already a nightmare to park in and make it worse? This wouldn't be such a problem if we had voted for gambling in this state so we could use the taxable income from that enterprise. Instead we give that money to South Dakota and Iowa. We still have gambling in the forms of Pull-tabs, Keno, and Lottery Tickets. So what was the big deal about the other forms of gambling, so we can generate money. Maybe we could get some tax relief.
    Posted by: Confused on Feb 27, 2008 at 02:43 PM
    I recall this all starting a couple years ago with the Royals looking for a small venue. Are the Royals gone from Omaha or will they have a share in this cost too? How can anyone justify 10 days for CWS and 9 home Jays games being cost effective? Royals, where are you? Face it Omaha, we're screwed!
    Posted by: Slimt on Feb 27, 2008 at 02:42 PM
    Plan on being Recalled Comrade Mayour.
    Posted by: k on Feb 27, 2008 at 02:40 PM
    Call me crazy but I think 84.52 million to renovate Rosenblatt will be a hell of a lot easier to get funded than the 139.79 million it is going to cost to build a new stadium. I wonder how much money Fahey had to put in MECA's pockets to get them to hand over parking lots C & E
    Posted by: Ed on Feb 27, 2008 at 02:38 PM
    I'm glad to hear Fahey finally fighting back. It seems as though the past couple weeks everyone has been complaining about a downtown stadium without even knowing the full facts and benefits to building it. Now we can realize how great a downtown CWS would be and how feasible it is. I'm not a democrat, and didn't vote for Fahey, but if he ran for reelection, he'll get my vote just for the fact that he's not backing down and standing up for what needs to be done.
    Posted by: susan on Feb 27, 2008 at 02:37 PM
    Will tickets to everything at the new stadium skyrocket? We have always enjoyed a few Omaha Royals games because it is so affordable for an entire family to go and actually have concessions there too.
    Posted by: Trevor on Feb 27, 2008 at 02:35 PM
    Best thing Fahey has done since in office. Job well done Mr. Mayor! Nobody wanted the Qwest Center while Daub was in office, now I don't think anyone in their right mind would want to do away with it. When Fahey is long gone out of publice office and this stadium is done, you will all be grateful it was built, just like with the Qwest. Also, now look at all the improvement our already incredible zoo will be able to make. I look forward to the future of the CWS and the future of the zoo.
    Posted by: TJ on Feb 27, 2008 at 02:33 PM
    They say the Qwest lots are the preferred place. DUH!!!! Thats where Col Fahey wants it so thats what HIS committee is going to say. 60 million from public funding, thats a little much in this time of everything being outragious. The CWS is one of the last things the city of Omaha needs. PK sure will be happy when they get to build the stadium. Mark my word they will get the job.
    Posted by: kevin on Feb 27, 2008 at 02:33 PM
    I still have no trust for Fahey or this hand picked committee. Espically the head of the committee, Ken Stinson. If this stadium actually gets built, what are the odds that the company for which Stinson is the Chairman of the Board for (Kiewit) gets the construction contract? ANd how can they give a figure for donations when there are no said doners yet?
    Posted by: Mike on Feb 27, 2008 at 02:32 PM
    HEY OMAHA! HAVE YOU HAD ENOUGH?? OR MAYBE YOU LIKE THE $60 MILLION DOLLAR PRICE TAG WE JUST GOT SADDLED WITH AS WELL AS $300 MILLION FOR THE QWEST LOAN, UNPAID PENSION FUNDS (estimated at $348 Million), NEW SEWERS AND STREET REPAIRS? OH, and before some idiot spouts off about how PROPOSED increases in TAXES and FEES will offset the public's financial responsibility (it won't), just take a SERIOUS look at how much of the PRINCIPLE for the QWEST loan has been paid off TO DATE. Yep, paid ZERO in principle and in 2010-2012 you are going to feel that big CRUNCH in our wallets when your taxes GO UP AGAIN! Heed the WARNING BELLS going off right now! As Diesing said, "In baseball terms, it's time to step up to the plate..." and for Omaha TAXPAYERS to blast Fahey out of his ball park before it's even built! RECALL FAHEY!! WWW.RECALL-FAHEY.COM SIGN/VOTE/RECALL! Else the next jingle you hear will be your hard-earned pennies being used on a monumnet to BAD leadership! 'Nuff said...
    Posted by: JB on Feb 27, 2008 at 02:30 PM
    Who says Rosenblatt is no longer a "viable alternative"? I am outraged by this. How can the city of Omaha, most of whom do not want to pay for this project not get a say in it? I will no longer be attending the CWS if this is the case.
    Posted by: Randy on Feb 27, 2008 at 02:29 PM
    Another reaason why we will never be a real city. Down with the old ,in with the new. No respect for tradition, or our past. The mayor sells us out again. I hope they put a stripmall across the street with lots of trendy little shops. Sure beats an Ice cream cone at a Landmark like Zesto's, or meeting with neighbors down by the stadium.
    Posted by: Tim on Feb 27, 2008 at 02:28 PM
    This is the best thing for the city of Omaha... How is it a snow job, no new stadium, no college world series.....would your rather have the college world series or not...Im sorry the area around Rosenblatt is not attractive and outside of Starsky's (Okay Zesto's...Its an ice cream shop which cna be moved...let me buy the recipes and I'll happily do it.) there is nothing there....You have bunch of people that are use to making $ to park in their yard...(which is scary)....complaining.... Fahey has a vision...look at the people the complained about the Qwest Center.....I think that has been very good for Omaha...think outside the box people....Even the Yankees, Cowboys and many more have figured out what new stadiums means.....rather than staying with the Old....
    Posted by: Jager Bomb on Feb 27, 2008 at 02:26 PM
    so where is that impeach Fahey petition?
    Posted by: Karen on Feb 27, 2008 at 02:20 PM
    I cant believe that one person (Mr Fahey) can have so much power to spend so much of the public's money, with the majority of talk being against this issue. Is there not someone in power in Nebraska that can stop this man? 2 weeks of big income (none of that going to the middle class person) at the expense of the middle class because I'm sure that it will come out of taxes. The U.S.A. states they are glad Castro is out of power. Whats the difference between him & Fahey if he can spend this kind of money with only the approval of a committee that he put together.
    Posted by: SAC on Feb 27, 2008 at 02:18 PM
    The Oversight Committee Personnel keep saying their direction was "to find the best alternative... within available funds." I think "Oversight" is definitely description of their actions and what they produced. I did not realize they could consider the deep deep pockets of the average taxpayer to be "within their available funds".
    Posted by: Bobbie on Feb 27, 2008 at 02:18 PM
    This proposed stadium is going to cost how much?? The current stadium's renovations have not yet been paid for, so we are going to throw more money down the drain and build a new one, for who, certainly not for the people who have supported and attended the CWS for many many years. This is yet another bone headed move by the powers that be.
    Posted by: Dave on Feb 27, 2008 at 02:16 PM
    All you stadium haters, how much has the Qwest Center increased your taxes? NONE, neither will the new baseball stadium. Get over it. Rosenblatt had a good run and now is time to move on. Rosenblatt is a filthy old stadium with a lot of paint to make it look okay. If people here in Omaha want to keep the CWS, which I assume most do, this is what needs to be done. Like it or not.
    Posted by: Fahey out on Feb 27, 2008 at 02:15 PM
    I want Fahey out of office. I hope he gets recalled. What a joke he is!
    Posted by: Dave on Feb 27, 2008 at 02:15 PM
    Where is the figure that Creighton will pay to use it for their home games? Or is that free of charge to them?
    Posted by: Brian on Feb 27, 2008 at 02:14 PM
    After hearing about the new stadium that was recomended to be built and how they are expecting to pay for it, you can expect me not to reccomend that anyone stay at a hotel in Omaha, and when I need to rent a car I will not do so in this state. What else did anyone expect with such a biased report by Mayor Fahey's hand picked survey team. What's in it for the Mayor?
    Posted by: This stinks on Feb 27, 2008 at 02:13 PM
    Raising taxes again. I still think it should be left up to the public. What happens when the ESTIMATED PRIVATE MONEY doesn't come through? The citizens will have to foot the bill. I have lived in this city my entire life, and am so tired of paying for items not needed. If everybody cared more about the recession, and all the homeless (avg. age is 9 years old) the world would be a better place. I am out of here, I'm gonna move somewhere where if I have to pay this much to live, I will have entertainment options. You all have fun downtown with the CWS - I will be watching and laughing!
    Posted by: Kl on Feb 27, 2008 at 02:10 PM
    Smoke and mirrors. Smoke and mirrors. Does Fahey really think the people from Omaha are so stupid to believe that this plan will not involve property taxes?
    Posted by: Linda on Feb 27, 2008 at 02:10 PM
    Anyone who accepts this proposal can pay for it in the years to come. Why come to Omaha? All these taxes will only cause people to stay away. Don't hear too much about tourism in Portland, OR and they have high taxes too. Council Bluffs, I hope you get the College World Series!!
    Posted by: me on Feb 27, 2008 at 02:05 PM
    Funding from a "variety of sources"... Isn't this similar to what we heard about the Qwest Center? At least the administration at that time gave the public the impression that we had a voice in whether or not it was built. Dictator Fahey didn't even do that. His "variety of sources" just means that he will tax us in ways we haven't even dreamed of.
    Posted by: Chris on Feb 27, 2008 at 02:05 PM
    Any respect I ever had for Mr. Fahey is totally gone. Sad day for Omaha.
    Posted by: omahan on Feb 27, 2008 at 02:04 PM
    long live the almighty king fahey. whats the next project? build a new henry dorly zoo next to the quest center?
    Posted by: jjj on Feb 27, 2008 at 02:04 PM
    why is parking lots C & E more desirable than other places with more room in the same vicinity?
    Posted by: Dennis on Feb 27, 2008 at 02:01 PM
    Mayor Fahey is proposing a 24,000 seat downtown stadium to secure a 20-25 year CWS contract. It hardly makes sense to reduce stadium capacity when planning that far in advance for an event of ever increasing popularity. Over the past 4 years, the top 10 CWS single-session attendance numbers at Rosenblatt stadium ranged from 26,604 to 30,335. An investment of the magnitude being proposed should certainly involve better planning for future growth.
    Posted by: SAC on Feb 27, 2008 at 01:53 PM
    Another example of Taxation without Representation. First Fahey gobbled up Elkhorn without considering those who were impacted, now he's force-feeding his ballpark down our throats. He won't even stop a moment to listen to viable options. I can't believe i'm about to say this, but Former Mayor Daub actually has a good idea (for an alternate site... the Union Pacific Land). If only.....
    Posted by: Mike on Feb 27, 2008 at 01:42 PM
    As long as Sokol doesn't get his way we will keep the CWS. I believe he wants us to lose it so his buddy Hal can become mayor again.
    Posted by: Bill J on Feb 27, 2008 at 01:41 PM
    RECALL FAHEY!
    Posted by: jj on Feb 27, 2008 at 12:49 PM
    Funnt, I didnt see a SNOW JOB in Jim Flowers forecast, oh its a Fahey Snow Job.
    Posted by: TJ on Feb 27, 2008 at 12:34 PM
    Should be interesting to see what this is gonna cost the people once Fahey exhausts all of his other income ideas.
    Posted by: M on Feb 27, 2008 at 11:48 AM
    It is a sad day when the citizen of Omaha DON'T have a say in a new stadium. The citizens who voted Fahey into office didn't expect him to make ALL decisions regarding expenditueres on LUXURY items.
    Posted by: Doug on Feb 27, 2008 at 11:44 AM
    Mr. Fahey said he is up against and unfavorable group. They probably wouldn't be unfavorable if you had included the people who will be affected by this event. If you would have included them and not done all this in "secret", they would have maybe stood behind you and trusted you. Trusting you is something I won't do any more. Nor voting for you in the next election.
    Special Sections