Effort To End Affirmative Action In Nebraska Not Over
Effort To End Affirmative Action In Nebraska Not Over Save Email Print
Bill withdrawn, petition drive underway to get proposal on ballot
Posted: 1:05 AM Feb 27, 2008
Last Updated: 1:05 AM Feb 27, 2008

A | A | A

Former California regent Ward Connerly, a national figure in the battle against affirmative action, spoke Tuesday to a hostile crowd at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln.

Nebraska is one of five states being targeted by the California group Super Tuesday for Equal Rights. Colorado, Missouri, Oklahoma and Arizona are the others.

Connerly, who leads the Super Tuesday group, was a key force behind California's successful ballot measure banning considering of race and gender in public hiring, contracting and school admissions in 1996.

Connerly's supporters are gathering signatures for a proposed constitutional amendment in Nebraska that would bar "preferential treatment to any individual or group on the basis of race, sex, color, ethnicity or national origin in the operation of public employment, public education or public contracting."

The crowd of mostly students cheered when a speaker referred to the death of a constitutional amendment (LR233CA) that was pulled Monday by the state senator who introduced it.

Sen. Mark Christensen of Imperial said he withdrew the measure because of pressure from other senators who threatened to torpedo his other bills.

"Some people would call it extortion," said Marc Schniederjans, the UNL professor who filed the petition. "Some people would call it blackmail."

Schniederjans said a blatantly discriminatory incident at the university, which he wouldn't describe, convinced him the university was using unfair preferences and he contacted the Nebraska Civil Rights Initiative, which is connected to Connerly's group.

Connerly said his resolution is vital to the nation's competition in a global marketplace. "Our country is falling behind in so many areas. We can't compete. We've made diversity more important than accomplishment. We've gotten soft and we're losing jobs because of it."

Connerly said if the measure makes the November ballot and voters approve it, minority numbers in enrollment and employment could drop at universities in Nebraska, but "I have no doubt they'll come back up."

Connerly said he picked Nebraska because it is one of 23 states with the initiative process. Connerly has championed measures in four states and voters approved measures in California, Michigan and Washington.

In Florida, then-Gov. Jeb Bush implemented his own plan eliminating the use of race or gender in higher education and government hiring.

Connerly said he believes the Supreme Court will decide in his favor eventually. The court ruled in 2003 race could be a limited factor in college admissions, but Justice Sandra Day O'Connor said at the time she thought affirmative action would be no more in 25 years, Connerly said.

Asked if he planned to try to pass the measure in the 19 other states with the initiative process, Connerly said, "I hope we don't have to do that. I don't think I'll live that long."

Students cheered each others' questions and jeered Connerly's responses. One student asked if Connerly was supported or funded by the Ku Klux Klan. Connerly said no and called it "a stupid question."

As to the outrage that seems to follow his measures, he said, "Any time you take something away from a group of people they're going to scream."

Connerly's opponents say the petition initiatives avoid the terms affirmative action and use language that intentionally confuses people.

"If they believe it's synonymous with racial preferences, then just use the words affirmative action," said ReNee Dunham, president of the American Association for Affirmative Action. She and others came to Nebraska to testify against Christensen's amendment and held a rally in Omaha Tuesday evening.

"Then you can be sure the voters know what they're voting against."

Connerly said the measure doesn't ban all affirmative action, but says it cannot be used in hiring, admissions or the awarding of contracts at government institutions.

Dunham said Connerly is playing to people's fears that unqualified minorities are being picked over qualified non-minorities. She said it took the University of California system seven years to rebound in applications from African-American students.

"The impact is greater than just the decision that's before us today," she said.

The proposed amendment has met opposition from the University of Nebraska, with the Board of Regents saying it could eliminate some measures the university now uses to increase and promote diversity.

That includes recruitment of students from other countries, trying to attract more minority candidates for faculty positions and events aimed at minority students.

A group wanting to amend the state constitution must gather about 114,000 signatures, 10% of the state's registered voters, by July 4th to get the issue on the November ballot.

More Stories
Family Mourns Omaha's Latest Murder Victim

Midtown Sparkles Sunday Night

Gun Violation Found On MySpace

Conference Examines Impact Of Disasters

Park East Store Burglarized

Protection Order Violations

Fire at Omaha Apartment Complex Blamed on Electrical Problem

Ralston Celebrates Independence Day

Post Your Comments
First Name:
Location:
Enter Comments: characters left
Email (optional):
By posting this comment I have read and agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy:
You must agree to the Terms of Service to continue.
Read Comments
Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
Posted by: Kristie on Feb 29, 2008 at 11:12 AM
As mentioned in many posts, affirmative action does NOT equal quotas, nor does it apply to unqualified people. What it does is level the field for those qualified applicants who might be overlooked otherwise. We must remember that the Civil Rights Movement, which granted equal rights, was only 44 years ago. That's not a long time considering african americans have been here for 300 years. So there are a lot of systems that still need this policy in place for America to even compete in the global market. We must also remember, Affirmative Action doesn't just apply to jobs or minorities, but this bill would affect education, women, women and minority owned businesses, programs based on age, and disabilities. I agree that selection should be based on merit. My problem is whose defintition of merit will be applied. I challenge all of you who are ready to sign, to educate yourself on what Affirmative Action really means and look at all the programs at UNMC,UNO,and UNL that will be affected.

Posted by: The Original Anonymous on Feb 29, 2008 at 08:52 AM
Bill, that's a tough question. Of course, the original KKK aligned with Democrats, because Republicans forced the War Between the States and sponsored Amendments 13-15 (although one notable Democrat sponsored the 13th Amendment), freeing and giving rights to slaves. Today the Klan claims to represent “White Christians”, which means they want to have the credibility of Christians while at the same time offending and discrediting Christians. Given that, I would have to guess most Klansmen are Democrats who register as Republicans.

Posted by: Keith on Feb 28, 2008 at 05:44 PM
In college, I attended a discussion group sponsored by Affirmative Action, and the leader told us not enough minorities signed up, so we might not get funding. (Magically, we got enough minority names on the roster, but the size of the group didn't change.) I thought, why are only “non-minorities” using this Affirmative Action group? Then I realized that many minorities didn't use the tools given them to compete, because they didn't need to compete. I didn't mind the study groups intended to help people "catch up" from a lesser education. But when graduation came, looking at people who were given a chance to learn and didn't take it, yet their degree was supposedly equivalent to mine--that upset me. Fortunately, I found that employers knew my degree was more valuable, but they had hiring quotas to deal with. All I could figure was that Affirmative Action was a cruel trick to devalue educated minorities and increase racism. It’s been 20 years, and the hoax goes on. It’s time to end it.

Posted by: Mary O. on Feb 27, 2008 at 08:57 PM
I'm with you, Jennifer. Really, can someone from WOWT tell us where to go to sign the petition? I believe that the most qualified person be hired for a position. Same goes for managers hiring their friends from outside of the company rather than promoting from within, so race and gender are not the only factors in preferential treatment of candidates/employees.

Posted by: smiley on Feb 27, 2008 at 08:35 PM
I also would like to sigh this.

Posted by: M on Feb 27, 2008 at 07:06 PM
I would much prefer my doctor, lawyer or teacher got their job due to their accomplishments rather than their sex, gender, race or religion.

Posted by: Jennifer on Feb 27, 2008 at 05:14 PM
Where do I sign to become one of the 114,000 signatures needed?

Posted by: Biff on Feb 27, 2008 at 03:31 PM
Great post, Bill. I would only like to add that you don't achieve "equality" by giving someone else the short end of the stick. You are only doing to them what was done to you (or, in some cases, what you perceived was done to you). Yes, there was a time and a place for affirmative action, but it's not now and not here.

Posted by: Bill on Feb 27, 2008 at 01:42 PM
Anonymous: Just wondering, in the current political world, which of the two major parties a KKK member would identify with ...? I realize most would claim independent parties, or Libertarian, but if the choices were Reps or Dems, which do you suppose they would lean toward? The Democratic party had a major split with racism in the 1948 election when Truman declared he would mandate integration in the military, which paved the way for the civil rights movement later on. But this discussion has gotten far off topic. Affirmative action had a time and place with great relevance and purpose, and many advances could not have been made without it, but - with the exception of a few isolated areas in the country - discrimination is getting to be less of a concern. In pursuit of the highest possible profits, companies want to hire the most qualified, but can't because of quotas. Race, gender, etc. would not matter if quotas were removed, only the end results shown by profit margins.

Posted by: Steve on Feb 27, 2008 at 01:18 PM
Bill, I couldn't have said it better myself. Great comment!

Posted by: Anonymous on Feb 27, 2008 at 12:04 PM
I guess that student doesn't know that, before the KKK became a pariah, the KKK and the Democratic Party were tightly aligned. The KKK even threatened and murdered Republicans. Yes, that was a STUPID QUESTION by a student who FORGOT TO STUDY HISTORY.

Posted by: Ken on Feb 27, 2008 at 11:29 AM
How typical. A bill against discrimination was pulled because the detracting senators threatened to discriminate against Sen. Christensen's other bills. I'm sure the other senators have said, "But I didn't TEACH my child racism." Nah, they just learn it from your actions.

Posted by: Maurice on Feb 27, 2008 at 09:55 AM
"Level Playing Field" I guess that would mean affirmative action is outdated. Race, religion, sex, nat'l origin should never be a factor with employment in any capacity.

Posted by: Bill on Feb 27, 2008 at 09:52 AM
It's unfortunate that a system that was so sorely needed 40 years ago is still in place and being expanded. Affirmative action is no less racist than profiling airline passengers or hate-crime legislation (isn't all crime with a victim a hate crime of some sort?). I have to agree that "we've made diversity more important than accomplishment." I've seen innumerable instances where a person was given a promotion, contract, or accolade simply for having a different gender, race, or religion. The US Govt. is the worst. My neice is biracial, but was offered a full-ride scholarship by the UNCF; she turned it down, because she didn't feel she should get a benefit others didn't simply because of her skin color - I couldn't be prouder. Affirmative action and hate crime legislation now do more to highlight the differences between us and draw attention to bias than they do to help provide solutions to the problems of inequity. Treat a person as a person, not a statistic or a symbol.

Posted by: RJ on Feb 27, 2008 at 08:56 AM
If it is wrong, not to hire someone on the basis of their race, sex, ect. and I agree. Then why is it right to hire someone based on their race, sex, ect? If someone is qualified for a job, I have no problem with them getting the job. Problem is, I have seen unqualified people get jobs apparently due to their race, or sex, ect. Why can't all people be on an equal playing field. Ok, I am a white male, I don't think I am racist or sexist, but I see no need for affirmative action.

Special Sections