Family In Home 15 Years Charged For Address Change
Family In Home 15 Years Charged For Address Change Save Email Print
Annexed Elkhorn resident furious over phone bill
Posted: 5:53 PM Feb 20, 2008
Last Updated: 8:29 PM Feb 20, 2008
Email Address: sixonline@wowt.com

A | A | A

Imagine living in the same home for 15 years and notice a charge on your phone bill for a new address. It happened to an Elkhorn family months after being annexed by Omaha.

The Elkhorn annexation changed the Munch family's street name from “place” to “circle.” That means all of their bills must change from place to circle, the only change needed.

When it came to their Qwest phone bill, that simple change came with big surprises. "I really don't do a whole lot on the computer, my kids do it all for me."

But the Internet, along with phone calls at the Munch house, unexpectedly got more expensive. "It is a charge for a new service and I said it's not a new service, I've had the same service for 15 years, everything's the same," says Cathy Munch, just one of many in Elkhorn whose address changed after the annexation.

But it's in name only, her house is still in the same spot. "Same house, same everything."

That's why charges from Qwest have Munch asking why? “The one-time charge for order processing, charge for service at new address, $33."

"They actually didn't do anything. I've lived here, they didn't flick no switches, they didn't come and disconnect it and reconnect it, they did nothing on that point, they just threw it all in a bill and said address change and you've got to pay all the extra now."

The extra goes on. The bundled services plan Munch has had for years at the same price is also higher. "It's just a basic plan, the call waiting, call forwarding, all that stuff, but being as the address has changed they cancel out that plan, that has been closed out and they start a new one, so with the new one I cannot get the rate that I was guaranteed."

After several calls, Qwest has now taken some of the charges off of Cathy's bill this month, but they can't guarantee her normal bill of $63 will ever return. "But then she said, next month it shows on their computer I'll still get billed 80-plus dollars," says Cathy.

"It's just not fair that why should I have to cancel the package that I've had for 15 years because we were annexed, that's just not right.”

Channel 6 News contacted Qwest Wednesday about the problem. A spokesperson said this should have been just a routine record change and not a new address service. She said they have fixed the problems with Cathy's bill.

The Qwest spokesperson also said other residents of Elkhorn should not see the same problem on their bill, that this was just an isolated problem that should not have happened in the first place.

More Stories
Fireworks Show Threatened By Rain

Holiday Weekend Fireworks Displays

Fireworks Injury Victim Warns Others

Woman Stabbed Multiple Times

Update: Owner of Pit Bulls Cited

Barking Upsets Neighbors

Historian Follows In Ancestor's Footsteps

Palin Resigns As Alaska Governor

Post Your Comments
First Name:
Location:
Enter Comments: characters left
Email (optional):
By posting this comment I have read and agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy:
You must agree to the Terms of Service to continue.
Read Comments
Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
Posted by: Emily on Feb 22, 2008 at 08:15 AM
Why is this even news? She got the charge removed, end of story. It was a mistake. If I called channel 6 everytime there was a mistake on one of my bills I'd have their phone number memorized and they would recognize my voice on the other line without having to tell them who I was!!! Come on people- will you look for any reason to complain about the city you live in? If you don't like it MOVE!!!!

Posted by: Essie on Feb 21, 2008 at 04:28 PM
to Anonymous-I am an ex-Omahan, who eats, flies out of, and works in Omaha. I NEVER tell anyone when I'm vacation that I'm from Omaha and yes, I hate Fahey. I don't hate Omaha but hate what it's become under the Fahey regime. I lived in Millard when it was annexed in 1971 and we got the same story from Omaha-sevices won't change, but they did. An apartment building behind my house caught fire, it's 4 blocks from an OFD station but Ralston, Papillion and Millard's volunteer FD's all responded an hour sooner than OFD did. Now some moron has sponsored a bill in the Unicameral to give large cities the ability to annex any town regardless of size or location (meaning over county lines). Fahey's been trying to extend his wheeltaxes over county lines as have other mayors-all of which failed. I don't live in Omaha, don't want/need your services and sure the heck don't want your taxes.

Posted by: Mr G on Feb 21, 2008 at 03:02 PM
Qwest loves to stick it to their customers. I switched to Cox many years ago and have never looked back. I suggest everybody else do the same.

Posted by: Govt.Observer on Feb 21, 2008 at 01:09 PM
Regarding the post below (attached), just what does the following have to do with this discussion Mr. Anonymous? In my humble opinion, nothing? The point I believe doris is trying to make is that Elkhorn did not want nor ask for the annexation and Elkhorn was led to believe there was not going to be any address changes, then when there was, they did not expect Qwest or any other vendor to screw up billings and existing programs. I shows me a lack of planning and research on by the Fahey administration (in their haste to annex) to ensure that the change was made smoothly, which for a lot of people has not been. So, before you trash doris, or anyone else for that matter, try and understand where they are coming from. Posted by: Anonymous on Feb 20, 2008 at 07:14 PM thanks doris for being the typical Fahey/Omaha hater but probably works in Omaha, flies out of Omaha, eats in Omaha, shops in Omaha, when on vacation tells people youre from Omaha, then complains about Omaha.

Posted by: Steve on Feb 21, 2008 at 11:04 AM
I think that if anyone is to blame, it's Mayor Fahey himself for annexing Elkhorn in the first place. If he would do his civic duties in OMAHA & stay out of the suburbs, this town would be a WHOLE lot better off.

Posted by: Biff on Feb 21, 2008 at 10:35 AM
We switched from Qwest years ago and never looked back. Pretty pathetic that an incompetent company has its name on one of Omaha's "main attractions". I'm hoping that when the new stadium is built (it seems to be inevitable), a better company claims naming rights.

Posted by: Laura on Feb 21, 2008 at 10:14 AM
It's actions like this that made us switch from Qwest to Cox 5 years ago. NOTHING could make us switch back...our phone bill is less than HALF what it was under Qwest. Of course, if Elkhorn residents would have been allowed to keep their addresses after the annexation, none of this would have happened in the first place. This reminds me of the story of the City of Omaha planning to fine anyone for displaying the former street address when some of those are permanently built into the house's exterior in BRICK. Anything to make a buck...both on Qwest's part and on Omaha's.

Posted by: So over it!!! on Feb 21, 2008 at 08:28 AM
I think its sad that people drag a company's name in the mud over a fee that was fixed. Computers make mistakes. I have had every phone company (cell, home, internet) possible from this region and several others. The charge that the customer got is as a result of mandates these "phone companies" must charge due to legistlative measures. Its unfortunate. I like my Qwest service. Remember about 2 years ago they didnt release their customer's information to the government...but everyone else did. That's comendable. I had Cox they give great promotions for cost and then 3 months later the bill was nearly $200. My Qwest gives me what I had with Cox and a cell phone for less money. All telecommunications providers have issues this is no different.

Posted by: Deanna on Feb 21, 2008 at 07:56 AM
Just another example of a "big" company tying to take advantage of the "smaller" guy, i.e. Citibank, Mortgage companies, etc. This isn't the first time, nor is it the last. If people don't speak out, it will happen over and over and not just in Nebraska. Another reason why I love Vonage!!!! Thanks Channel 6 for doing this story!

Posted by: obed on Feb 20, 2008 at 10:34 PM
my problem with qwest took some time in phone calls to qwest a letter to the ceo of qwest and contacting the FTC and Iowa attorney generals office to resolve the matter.

Posted by: LSB on Feb 20, 2008 at 09:43 PM
Yeah Qwest! I too had issues with them when I moved. They changed my account number even though I kept the same phone number, so when I sent a western union payment for $200 to the same account number they lost it and shut off my service. When I called to find out the problem they even went so far as to say they dont accept western union payments. I had paid them at the HyVee in Fremont for over 2 yrs via western union and had the canceled receipt for the transaction. I know use Roadrunner for internet and my family all has cell phones. Qwest's "spirit of service" is a complete joke! If they can get away with it, they will. They are cheaper, but I would rather pay a few extra bucks to get better service and no lost payments.

Posted by: Katie on Feb 20, 2008 at 08:20 PM
This sounds like typical Qwest headaches. They are the most unorganized company I have ever seen. My actual move resulted in two weeks worth of headaches from them. They need to wake up and realize they are not the only game in town.

Posted by: J on Feb 20, 2008 at 07:59 PM
Fahey promised: no address changes. What happened? Address changes. Someone at Qwest seized upon that to make some money. Where I live, I'm stuck with Qwest and all their silly games and have been at their mercy. (Sorry, no Cox, cell reception is weird here.) Kudos to Channel 6 for exposing this and even getting Qwest to back off and fixing this for the Munch family!

Posted by: Anonymous on Feb 20, 2008 at 07:14 PM
thanks doris for being the typical Fahey/Omaha hater but probably works in Omaha, flies out of Omaha, eats in Omaha, shops in Omaha, when on vacation tells people youre from Omaha, then complains about Omaha.

Posted by: doris on Feb 20, 2008 at 06:38 PM
The point being made is that it is Omaha's fault that they are even having to have this hassle. Because Omaha annexed them she can't get her same program that she has because it is now an Omaha address. THEY never requested any change but suddenly she is being charged more She should send the excess bill to Fahey because he said there wouldn't be any change in services. Don't ya just love politicians???

Posted by: Mark on Feb 20, 2008 at 06:09 PM
Ha, I'm not going to complain about Omaha. :) THey should get Cox phone services....better and much cheaper than "the phone company".

Posted by: Anonymous on Feb 20, 2008 at 05:58 PM
before people complain about omaha, qwest charged the fee. its qwest's fault

Special Sections