The Weather Authority
Currents
Doppler Radar
7-Day
WOWT.com on Demand
  • 6 On Your Cell
  • RSS Feeds
  • Desktop Alert
  • Text Alerts
  • Daily E-News
  • What’s on 6
  • Children's Programming Changes
    YouCast - Submit Pics and Video
    Watch NBC Shows Online
    MarketPlace
  • Restaurants
  • Go Green!
  • Auto Map
  • Business Connections
  • Financial Advice
  • Legal Advice
  • New Home Listings
  • Your Home, Your Investment
  • Entertainment
  • Recipes
  • Jobs
  • The Wedding Planner
  • Martha's Tip of the Day
  • Advertise With WOWT
  • New Pitch For Stadium Has Suttle Changes Save Email Print
    City councilman's plan would involve sales tax in outlying areas
    Posted: 10:30 AM Feb 13, 2008
    Last Updated: 9:48 PM Feb 13, 2008
    Email Address: sixonline@wowt.com

    A | A | A

    Omaha City Councilman Jim Suttle has put a new proposal on the table aimed at keeping the College World Series and said Wednesday he cannot support a new stadium.

    The two major proposals discussed have involved extensive renovations to Rosenblatt Stadium or a new ballpark in downtown Omaha. Both are expensive propositions.

    Suttle said his plan is designed to save the CWS and protect Omaha taxpayers. "I am announcing today that I will not support and I will not vote for the downtown stadium proposal as it's been presented to me and my colleagues on the city council," Suttle said at a news conference outside of Rosenblatt Stadium.

    Suttle said he won't vote for a new downtown facility for two reasons. He says the mayor's plans to pay for it are too risky and he doesn't agree with the fact that the public has been kept out of the decision-making process.

    The councilman said the city faces a $1.5 billion sewer renovation and $700 million shortfall in city pension funds.

    So what's his answer? Councilman Suttle says his plan is a win-win for everyone. It lays out plans for Rosenblatt and financing for the next 45 years. It would keep Rosenblatt and eventually a new stadium there and the money for it all would come from not just Omaha, but five counties and their cities.

    He is proposing what he called the 20-25 Rosenblatt Solution. It's a two-part plan to address a CWS contract for the next 20 years followed by an agreement for 25 years after that.

    The first phase is to make improvements to Rosenblatt in an effort to reach a CWS deal from 2011 to 2031. He is proposing a Sports Facility Capital Fund that will be used to finance improvements.

    The second phase of his proposal addresses the period from 2031 to 2056 and it includes building sports facilities for area youth throughout the five county region, after the Rosenblatt improvements are complete.

    With Save Rosenblatt supporters standing by, Suttle, with the support of Councilman Garry Gernandt, announced his plan to save Rosenblatt. The fund would pay for improvements and eventually a new stadium where Rosenblatt now stands.

    Suttle says there's many ways to get the money. One is a surcharge on CWS seats. Another is getting the surrounding communities involved. "We need partners from the five counties, two in Iowa, three in Nebraska, the cities that are inside of those counties, the state of Nebraska."

    That includes Douglas, Sarpy, Washington, Pottawattamie and Mills counties and their cities, places Suttle says benefit from College World Series.

    "If we had a one-tenth of a cent sales tax approved by the voters, that would generate $9.7 million out of the five counties, that's a heck of a stable number."

    The idea of taxpayers outside of Omaha helping to support Rosenblatt started some discussions at The Downtown Coffee Shop in Bellevue.

    “I think we pay enough in taxes,” says Richard James of Bellevue, who worries the CWS doesn't bring enough money into the other counties like Sarpy, to warrant support from them, adding Omaha sees the biggest benefit.

    "The amount of money that it actually brings into the area, why can't they recoup some of that and invest it into it,” says James. “I just think they're taxing us to death."

    He agrees with Councilman Suttle on one point though, tradition. "That's kind of where it's always been and you're wanting to walk away from the whole thing and build another stadium, I just don't think that's right."

    Councilman Suttle does say what he proposed Wednesday is just the outline of his plan. The details still need to be worked out, but he hopes this starts the discussion.

    Mayor Mike Fahey has been pushing for a new downtown stadium. Not surprisingly, he is not commenting on Councilman Suttle's plan. He's waiting for the recommendation from his stadium committee and doesn't feel it's right to say anything right now.

    More Stories
    Pelini: Team Needs to Be More Disciplined

    Nader Campaign Plans Omaha Stop

    Two More Left Under Safe Haven

    Bus Bogs Down in Street Hole

    Banks & Recession Worry Financial Markets

    Shooting Victim In Stable Condition

    Music Hall Packed For Palin

    Salmonella Warning

    Post Your Comments
    First Name:
    Location:
    Enter Comments: characters left
    Email (optional):
    Email will not be displayed on site. For station contact purpose only.
    Read Comments
    Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
    Posted by: Keith on Feb 16, 2008 at 01:54 PM
    "The NCAA will accept Rosenblatt renovations." "The NCAA wants a downtown stadium." I don't know what to believe, but there's one thing I know for sure: if Omaha is depending on my vote to increase sales tax in Sarpy, THE CWS WILL BE MOVING. There's no way I'll trust Omaha with a "Sports Facility Capital Fund" to build youth facilities in my county in 20 years. Omaha's already "borrowed" from the city pension fund and is only paying it back because the city was sued. And they have other pressing needs like the sewer renovation. Trust them with a Capital Fund? The only reason Suttle wants other areas to pay now and wait for facilities is because Omaha hasn't been fiscally responsible to manage the needs for the stadium now. Remember Wimpy? "I'll gladly pay you Tuesday for a hamburger today." I'm not going for the con. Come on! Omaha can't annex across county and state lines, but they want to tax us? Yeah... Right...

    Posted by: dave on Feb 16, 2008 at 12:20 AM
    LIKE THE QWESTCENTER WE WILL BE ON THE MAP WITH THE NEW BASEBALL STADIUM. CAN YOU SAY OUTDOOR CONCERTS. SORRY IF THAT SOUNDS TOO REALISTIC !!!!!!!

    Posted by: MJ on Feb 15, 2008 at 12:42 PM
    To m: We "dump 10 -15 million" into Rosenblatt every year because NCAA wants certain things upgraded. We Could build a new stadium and in 5 years be putting money into it for the upgrades that the NCAA wants.

    Posted by: Dave on Feb 15, 2008 at 11:26 AM
    THE NEW STADIUM IS GOING TO BE GREAT. I HOPE EVERYONE CAN COME TOGETHER AND ENJOY IT TOGETHER.

    Posted by: M on Feb 14, 2008 at 01:48 PM
    Everyone if forgetting that 30million is currently owed on Rosenblatt. So the ideas of tearing it down and putting something else there is not going to happen. What business would sink 30 million dollars on just property alone, plus building whatever on it?? To T who said "give Rosenblatt to the Zoo", The Zoo DOES NOT want the land. Also, the land on 12th and Cumming is currently on hold for potential sale to build the new stadium. 12th and Cumming is still quite a little hike to get to all of 'Downtown's Amnenites" don't you think???

    Posted by: Dennis on Feb 14, 2008 at 01:25 PM
    The College World Series is not going anywhere stadium or no stadium. There is no proof that any city could support this and get the same crowds. Right now it is a cancer on the financial well being of Omaha maybe lets call the NCAA bluff and say you can have it. It is less then a 2 week event motels and hotels need revenue more then that to survive.

    Posted by: Ted on Feb 14, 2008 at 12:30 PM
    Do you really think people in the surrounding counties are going to pay for this? Sounds a lot like more taxes for residents to bear. I would think that the 1 BILLION in sewer repair would be enough to stop our "wise" leaders from spending money so frivously...opps too late we just had to have the pedestrian bridge to CB, Thanks guys. If we can't keep the CWS here and not bankrupt the city with any plan then maybe, just maybe, it is time to let it go. Hal Daub ruined part of the tradition when he got rid of the old Dingerville.

    Posted by: GM on Feb 14, 2008 at 12:26 PM
    Build A new stadium out West. Stay away from the hassel of downtown.

    Posted by: big Jim on Feb 14, 2008 at 12:13 PM
    Spending millions of dollars for something that gets used 10 days a year. Get real people, the CWS can find a new home -- I pay enough in property taxes.

    Posted by: Randy on Feb 14, 2008 at 12:11 PM
    Why would the NCAA insist on a new stadium being downtown? Why not out west where there are plenty of hotels being built, plenty of shopping centers, plenty of resturants plenty of land to build parking., plenty of clean space. The NCAA has said it did not come up with the idea of a new downtown stadium. My question is, why is west Omaha not being considered? Anyone know the answer?

    Posted by: m on Feb 14, 2008 at 11:31 AM
    People,People,People of Omaha have a bad habit of looking stupid in front of opportunity. Rosenblatt is old we need to build a new stadium. What people forget is that we dump 10 to 15 million dollars into Rosenblatt every year. If we build a new stadium we won't have to do that every year. Either way we will be spending the money. Don't cry Omaha we are bigger then that. Just move on and get over it.

    Posted by: To Brian in Dallas on Feb 14, 2008 at 10:13 AM
    Let Okla City try for it... ESPN will LOVE the terrible turnout that city CONSISTANTLY produces with the Big 12 tournament. Even with both Oklahoma teams and the Texas teams, the stadium is ALWAY 1/2 full at best. Watch this spring and see what I mean.

    Posted by: Bob on Feb 14, 2008 at 09:27 AM
    Looks like the College World Series is ours for the taking. Its too bad Omaha is not progressive. Didn't I see you on American Idol or was that a cornfield.

    Posted by: larry on Feb 14, 2008 at 09:17 AM
    The city of OMAHA does not belong soley to FAHEY, the city council or a hand selected committee, but rather its citizens. All the possible options should be layed out to the people to be voted on. Let the people decide on what they will have to live with and be done with it. FAHEY pulling all the strings the way he wants is just wrong.

    Posted by: George on Feb 14, 2008 at 09:12 AM
    Glad to see that someone in the city govenment has some brains! Way to go Jim! Buuuut --- NO MORE TAXES!!!

    Posted by: Liz on Feb 14, 2008 at 08:28 AM
    Let the CWS go elsewhere. It is not worth the taxpayer's money to keep it here. We have so many other debts to worry about--there is NO WAY we can afford this!

    Posted by: Brian on Feb 14, 2008 at 08:25 AM
    I have a good friend that lives in Okla. City who firmly believes that they will be getting the CWS. If you don't think that this is a possibility, please take your head out of the sand.

    Posted by: Roy Rogers on Feb 14, 2008 at 05:28 AM
    What the hell is wrong with you people. If any of you people go to the Royals games you would notice that Rosenblatt is a GREAT stadium! Every seat in the place is brand friggin new! With all the money that Omaha has put into it in the last 15 years, it would be a complete waste of money to build a new stadium for $150 million. Where does the Mayor think he is going to get the money to pay for this? Oh, yeah... the entertainment tax.... thats a joke! When the entertainment tax doesn't bring the expected revenue and the private donations and such(the Mayor is expecting) don't add up. You know where the rest is going to come from.....your property tax! I say continue to do what is needed at Rosenblatt for far less than it would cost to build a new stadium. Lets face it, stadium improvements for the NCAA will never stop. If we build the new stadium, by the time it is done the NCAA will want something added or a better scoreboard or brighter lights. "Fixing" Rosenblatt saves money!

    Posted by: chuck on Feb 14, 2008 at 04:23 AM
    I support the downtown stadium idea, if the financing formula can be put together in a way that makes economic sense for Omaha, and if the NCAA gives us a long term contract. I have no problem seeing Rosenblatt torn down, as it has seen it's day and it is time to move on. (Yes, I grew up in Omaha, and have attended many games there). Suttle's press conference appeared to be a weak attempt at kicking off a mayoral campaign for himself. His "20 and 25" year contracts with the NCAA were laughable. He has no idea if the NCAA would give Omaha those sorts of contracts with his plans, and to adress the media and act as though those contracts would be a done deal was irresponsible. City leaders - please continue to investigate the downtown stadium. I would love to see it happen if we can work it out in a way that is financially responsible for the taxpayers.

    Posted by: Tradt on Feb 13, 2008 at 11:36 PM
    This plan by Suttle is ridiculous. 80 million dollars to renovate a 60 year stadium is equally ridiculous. A New Downtown Stadium is the best longterm plan for the future of Omaha. No the NCAA isn't going to come out and tell the city of Omaha they want a new downtown stadium. If we're not smart enough to figure that out then we have nobody to blame but ourselves when we lose the CWS to another city that has the vision and forsight to see all of the longterm economic benifits they stand to gain. Omaha is in a unique position to secure at least a 20 year contract for a MAJOR collegiate event. The NCAA is allowing Omaha the opportunity to secure the contract without having to bid against other cities. But if Omaha can't make a decision by the deadline then the NCAA will allow other cities to submit bids. And if that happens the price tag to keep the CWS will likely go up. The longer you wait the higher the cost. A downtown stadium would be a capital investment for the next 50 years.

    Posted by: Josh on Feb 13, 2008 at 11:01 PM
    Hey Jake and Gary, I'm wrong? Maybe you should review this timeline. From the World Herald, unless they are lying too. Check out the third one down. Nov.-Dec. 2006: With the current contract to expire in 2010, Omaha and the NCAA begin preliminary talks on a new 10-year contract to keep the College World Series. In informal discussions, the NCAA responds favorably to a proposed $26 million renovation at Rosenblatt. Feb. 23: College World Series of Omaha Inc. and the city make the formal offer to renovate Rosenblatt. March 12: NCAA responds to CWS Inc. with a proposal subtitled “New Stadium.” The memo suggests that the city consider a new $50 million downtown stadium. May 15: City proposes its first concept for a new stadium.

    Posted by: J on Feb 13, 2008 at 10:15 PM
    Steven - unfortunately, you are complete wrong. You didn't know this, but Creighton has said to all the students that the bar is only going to be open until 10pm at night. Unfortunately, you didn't pick up on that at all. They aren't doing it to satisfy those from the CWS. Sorry!

    Posted by: Pete on Feb 13, 2008 at 09:13 PM
    If you would like some insight on why the NCAA is looking for a downtown ball park, just do a google search and check out the stadium that was built in Indianaplois. They boast the fact it's walking distance from hotels, restuarants,vibrant skyline, and more. They even boast about their zoo! The NCAA plays hardball, they picked up and moved their headquarters to Indy overnight. Sounds like the proponents of a downtown stadium are listening to their biggest tennant. Will we save Rosenblatt if the CWS is gone? What will happen to our taxes if we lose the millions that the CWS brings to our city anually? City leaders please don't blow this one.

    Posted by: Wayne on Feb 13, 2008 at 09:12 PM
    Don't pay any attention to the man behind the curtian. Where have I heard that before? I've been sitting in the bleachers so to speak watching our mayor walt turning into one of our old mayors.(Hi Hal) If your in power does that mean you do not have to listen to the voice of the people? Jim brought some common sense to this issue. The average taxpayer isn't getting much of voice in this so for. Let's start Talking with each, not at each other.

    Posted by: shanon on Feb 13, 2008 at 09:01 PM
    Just let it go! I never get to go to it why should I pay for it? Why are we kissing their behinds ?Let them kiss ours!If the CWS wants some great town and country let them pay us for the experience to keep it here.

    Posted by: Jeff on Feb 13, 2008 at 08:46 PM
    Mike, The number I'm hearing is $140m, not $200. And spending $80m now on the Blatt for 20 years under the Suttle plan?? Has Suttle looked at what it will cost us in 20 years to replace the stadium under his plan? What about the lost $ from naming rights? The Fahey plan makes the most economic sence. If Gernant and Suttle want to really benefit South O, they need to develop the Rosenblatt property with something that will bring jobs and revenue to that district 365 days a year. How about Great Wolf Lodge, or a Theme Park next to the Zoo. How does Suttle plan to get all these other communities involved? The deadline is April! NCAA wants a stadium downtown. Find an answer that they will bite on, and keep the CWS in OMAHA!

    Posted by: Jay on Feb 13, 2008 at 07:53 PM
    If Rosenblatt isn't good enough then send the CWS on their way. How much money do they really bring to town?

    Posted by: Scott on Feb 13, 2008 at 07:52 PM
    What a great idea to have the surrounding counties finance the project. Why don't we build a stadium by the new Cabelas and JQ Hammonds Convention Center?

    Posted by: Insider on Feb 13, 2008 at 07:47 PM
    Big Surprise! Multi-millionaire Jim wants to play while somebody else pays. Not only is asking other cities/communities to foot the bill a hair-brained plan (would Omahans be willing to pay for a stadium in CB for instance?), it doesn't listen to the NCAA, the customer. When you don’t do that, the customer leaves. I have loved Rosenblatt since I was a kid, but it wouldn't be the same if we lose the CWS, and if we don't listen to the NCAA we will. Either way, we are still shoveling out a lot of money for a stadium. One way saves CWS, the other doesn't. If you think Fahey is a dictator, wait and see how Jim can abuse power. Isn't this the same guy that wanted us to get permits to change a light switch? Brilliant! Now THAT is a dictator. What’s next…potty permits? We need leadership, not a hall monitor bidding for more power. Incidentally, I wonder how how his ties to architecture/engineering firms are affected. An Insider

    Posted by: J on Feb 13, 2008 at 07:13 PM
    C - if you haven't been reading the news about the whole downtown ballpark, then you wouldn't know that part of the proposition to solve traffic was to incourage all of those places to work together on scheduling. The baseball teams are in town, they don't care when they play as long as they do play. Plus, everyone knows not to take 480 when they are going downtown, it's backed up for everything no matter how many events are being played or whats going on. Lori - did you not read this guys proposal? He wants to tax people more to get this thing going! You should NOT support him if you don't want to be taxed anymore. Finally, we would be paying for all of this stuff to happen. At least a new stadium would offer the option of having companies fund it through naming rights and such. I dont think pouring money into Rosenblatt ever will be the answer. There isnt anything else down there besides the zoo. I would love to go out to dinner or lunch and then go to the game but there's no option 2

    Posted by: Steven on Feb 13, 2008 at 06:37 PM
    I attended the news conference of Suttle's and then read the World herald's 2nd corporate editorial in 4 days tonight and have determined 2 things!! The wolves sense that Fahey's vulnerable and are lining up for a bid at Mayor and the World herald's one sided opinion for the downtown ballpark's site is BECAUSE when they tear down the old WH's facility they will have THE spot for corporate hospitality!!! Along with the big shots from Creighton with their new Booze permit!!! How convenient, just far enough away from the ballpark for the NCAA's Clean zone directive but close enough to party till the sun rises!!! When is someone going to ask the booze distributors how much they will kick in!! From what I have observed the Illegal tailgating going on in the stadium has to be big bucks!! How about putting the fine for consumption on stadium grounds up to 2-300$'s per ticket!How about just enforcing the LAW period on that! That would be a start.

    Posted by: Paul on Feb 13, 2008 at 05:38 PM
    Renovating or building new are both expensive propositions and no matter what, somebody will be unhappy they didn't get their way. Omaha needs to decide just how important the CWS is to it's identity and economy and act or not act as they see fit. Face it folks, it's a competitive world and there really are other cities who want the Series and will probably do what Omaha won't to get it. I grew up in Omaha and still work and do a lot of business her and would love to see good things happen. I will probably have to pay my fair share some way as well. I just get a little tired of the whining when someone has to pay to get something good going. Qwest would have been cheaper to build if previous administrations hadn't decided to put a Band Aid on the Civic. Omaha wants to be a "Major League" town but always wants to do it on a "Minor League" budget. Ante up and keep the CWS or keep bickering and let it go. It will. Your choice, our choice.

    Posted by: Really? on Feb 13, 2008 at 05:16 PM
    The real Suttle proposal: Put a bandaid on Rosenblatt, save a little money, look good, run for mayor. Twenty years from now when I'm out of office let someone else take the heat for building a new stadium that will probably cost twice as much.

    Posted by: Jake on Feb 13, 2008 at 05:16 PM
    To Josh, you are WRONG with your "fact". The NCAA has NEVER said anything about a "new stadium" and Dennis Poppe said that again in January to BASEBALL AMERICA. Stop believing everything Lord Fahey tells you. Next to: Joe, a downtown staddium "easier to get to"???? I work downtown, its a nightmare on a normal day. To Jeff, at least Suttle is offering and open-minded idea to save tradition. Finally, to Erik, Council Bluffs is great, but do you honestly think the NCAA would move the CWS to CB???? I can see it now... a new statue outside of Ameristar Stadium, "The Road to Council Bluffs"! Wonderful!

    Posted by: IMPEACH FAHEY on Feb 13, 2008 at 05:06 PM
    Great Idea! FINALLY someone who hears the voice of the people! JIM SUTTLE FOR MAYOR!!!!

    Posted by: James on Feb 13, 2008 at 04:59 PM
    This idea is stupid. Sure, lets dump $80M in Blatt now, then tear it down in 20 years and build a new one. OR, we could just build a new one now at today's prices and have it last 50 or 60 years. And where in Suttle's idea does the public get involved? Looks to me like he is showboating and eating out of the Save Rosenblatt hands.

    Posted by: Bob on Feb 13, 2008 at 04:56 PM
    With all this bickering Omaha is going to loose the CWS to Council Bluffs. The Qwest is loosing money now and if a stadium were built next to it for the CWS they would loose even more money..not to mention the lawsuit. Suttle has a GREAT IDEA! Put some real planning in the project so the CWS can stay in Nebraska.

    Posted by: Lydia on Feb 13, 2008 at 04:26 PM
    If the stadium were to be put downtown where would everyone park? Would we not book the Qwest for the 2 weeks the CWS is in town. Also traffic getting out of downtown is a nightmare after a concert. All the hotels are downtown by the restaurants and the people don't stay at the stadium after the game they go back to their rooms or restaurants by their hotel

    Posted by: T on Feb 13, 2008 at 04:06 PM
    Maybe it is time for the city to just pass on the CWS, build a smaller Haymarket Park type of stadium for the Royals and Creighton to share, turn Rosenblatt over to the zoo, and get on with life. I have enough trouble justifying the cost of the Qwest Center and Hilton, but to build a $150 million (plus) baseball stadium for use two weeks out of the year, that is bordering on crazy.

    Posted by: Shawn on Feb 13, 2008 at 04:02 PM
    Larry, Fahey is the Mayor of Omaha. If he is not behind a project, then it shouldn’t be pushed through by some city councilman. You may call him dictator, but we in Omaha call him Mayor.

    Posted by: M on Feb 13, 2008 at 04:00 PM
    Ok Joe, how is Omaha going to pay for this new stadium that you think is so fantastic?What if there are things going on at the Qwest when the CWS is going on and you know that will happen? Where is everyone going to park?? The other lame brain thing that Fahey did was the foot bridge for how much money! Whose paying for that?

    Posted by: C on Feb 13, 2008 at 03:49 PM
    If anyone was downtown this past Saturday night, you'd realize why a downtown stadium wouldn't work! There was a UNO hockey game at the Qwest, an event at the Civic and another at the Holland Center. Traffic was at a STAND STILL on I-480. Let's throw a new ballpark down there, and include all of the people that work downtown daily. How bad will traffic be then? I don't think people realize that Rosenblatt isn't THAT far from downtown, and I think it's a cop out for the mayor to blame Rosenblatt's location as the #1 factor for building a new stadium. Look at it logically, our downtown cannot provide enough parking, or driving space for a new ballpark. Let's also throw in the road construction that is ALWAYS present in our city. It isn't logical to put a stadium downtown...unless you are willing to move further north of the Qwest Center (and not in one of it's parking lots!) We already have parking issues there, let's not take away thousands of spots to build a stadium!

    Posted by: Sue on Feb 13, 2008 at 03:46 PM
    I think it's great that Mr. Suttle is trying to bring this issue back to the people. We should have a say in the decision on what the City should build, how to pay for this, and to have a firm END figure on how much it will cost us. I commend him for being a good steward of the people, (which is what the City Council is suppose to be) and trying to keep the issues out front. Not behind closed doors, as what's being done now by the Mayors office.

    Posted by: CRAIG ANDERSON on Feb 13, 2008 at 03:17 PM
    THE TAX PAYERS OF OMAHA THANK YOU. SOMEONE NEEDS TO STOP SPENDING OUR MONEY LIKE THERE IS NO TOMORROW, BECAUSE TOMORROW WILL COME, AND WE WILL BE BROKE. AND WE'LL BE BROKE.

    Posted by: Lori on Feb 13, 2008 at 03:11 PM
    Jim Suttle is our councilman and a long time ago he e-mailed me (in response to my contacting him) a VERY detailed letter of concern from the meetings about further overtaxing the citizens of Omaha for this new white elephant. I am behind him 1000%. This city is going to collapse from the inside out because all anyone wants to do is buy frills and thrills and ignore things like the sewers, the streets and the declining public safety forces. QUIT TRYING TO MAKE A SILK PURSE OUT OF A SOW'S EAR, Omaha, and let's spend the tax revenue on things that are SORELY needed. A baseball stadium is not one of them.

    Posted by: HC on Feb 13, 2008 at 03:10 PM
    The Mayor's new stadium...the new pedestrian bridge...when will it stop? Mr. Fahey is clearly demonstrating he's in charge, despite the question as to how in touch he is with what his constituents need and want. Given the sensitivity of the new stadium issue, Mr Fahey would do well to consider what happened in 1987 when Mr. Boyle told us he was in charge.

    Posted by: Ted on Feb 13, 2008 at 03:03 PM
    What does the NCAA want? It seems they have not told us, I may be wrong, what they require for a stadium. I don't see what is wrong with Rosenblatt.

    Posted by: Gary on Feb 13, 2008 at 02:57 PM
    Josh is well intentioned but wrong. The idea of a downtown stadium was hatched in Omaha, and this ill-conceived notion does not cash flow.

    Posted by: Mike on Feb 13, 2008 at 02:56 PM
    Jeff, if spending upwards of $200 million for a new staduim is your idea of coming together, then I support Suttle. NO MORE TAXES!!! What part of this don't you people get?

    Posted by: Harry on Feb 13, 2008 at 02:55 PM
    Jaime McCutcheon asked today what we think of Sarpy County being taxed to pay for renovations or new contruction to support the CWS - interesting question. Do Sarpy County businesses benefit?... Not really, unless they are a motel or restaurant. Do Sarpy County residents benefit?...Only if they attend CWS events. I don't think a tax increase or the issuance of a general obligation bond is the right answer. Those who benefit should pay for the project. Omaha should issue a revenue bond. The bond is paid for with gate reciepts - not general taxes. The city should also add or increase the local tax charged by hotels and resturants during the CWS. For those wishing to make contributions, the City could establish a fund. Bottomline: if those who benefit can not or will not pay for the project - let it go somewhere else.

    Posted by: blatt fan on Feb 13, 2008 at 02:53 PM
    rignt on Mr. Suttle!

    Posted by: Andy on Feb 13, 2008 at 02:52 PM
    Councilman Suttle, are you listening to the NCAA? They are willing to sign a long term contract to keep the CWS in Omaha. The trade off is a new stadium downtown! I suggest you take a trip to Indianappolis and look at their new downtown stadium. This is already the home of the NCAA. For the save Rosenblatt fans, "The road to INDY" is just one short 9 hour drive away.

    Posted by: Nancy on Feb 13, 2008 at 02:51 PM
    I've read all the comments, all the suggestions. Why is all the talk and worry about the CWS what about our Omaha Royals who have been here for 40 years and use Rosenblatt?

    Posted by: M on Feb 13, 2008 at 02:42 PM
    Either option needs to have a public vote. If it's our money that will be going into either of these plans, we should have a say in the matter. I know that the new stadium will go over budget and prob. cost 200 million to build. When it was first proposed it was 70 million and now it's over 120 million. I know many people "are tapped" with money now and more taxes will hurt them.

    Posted by: Pete on Feb 13, 2008 at 02:41 PM
    Looks like someone wants to get some kick backs for a new stadium.. I'm gonna move out of this overtaxed & holy roller town.

    Posted by: Bob on Feb 13, 2008 at 02:41 PM
    ABSOLUTELY CORRECT JOSH! Downtown is the way to go. Fahey and his staff have a great idea, but their delivery to the people was/is terrible. Does Suttle really think that anyone outside Omaha will help pay to renovate the BLATT, come on.

    Posted by: Erik on Feb 13, 2008 at 02:39 PM
    Well, if you saw his proposal then you would realize that it all about the 'if's' No city or county including the state of Iowa is going to agree with that garbage.. And besides the city of Council Bluffs already stated that it will try to lure both the CWS and Royals from Omaha with their own 'grand stadium'.

    Posted by: Jeff on Feb 13, 2008 at 02:28 PM
    Sounds like one more wrench in the plan to shove off the CWS. Seems like Mr. Suttle has all kinds of his own ideas. This looks to me like the formal kick off to his campaign to run for mayor. Why don' t our elected leaders come together to do what is best for Omaha and not their individual interests?

    Posted by: Joe on Feb 13, 2008 at 02:19 PM
    People are ignorant. Look at how the addition of the Qwest Center to the NoDO area helped to redevelop what once abandoned warehouses and factories. Downtown would be an amazing place for a new stadium. It'd be easier to get to, much newer, and continue to help downtown develop and compete with other expanding cities. I don't get what's so hard to understand about that...

    Posted by: Anonymous on Feb 13, 2008 at 02:17 PM
    you know i dont understand, we already have Quest that is in the red that we are paying for we are over taxed and now Fahey wants to build a new stadium, dont he think we should prepare for things that are comming at us? like maybe that LAWSUIT we are getting hit with because of the inmate that died in the city jail? Looks to me like fahey is spending now and worrying about other things later.WAY TO GO FAHEY BUT US FURTHER IN DEBT!!!!!!!!!!!

    Posted by: Rosen on Feb 13, 2008 at 02:08 PM
    HEY OMAHA, MAKE UP YOUR MIND ALREADY!! SOME OF US HAVE TO THINK ABOUT IF WE ARE GOING TO MOVE OR NOT!!

    Posted by: Z on Feb 13, 2008 at 01:25 PM
    Someone please answer this for me......Isn't Omaha poor enough as it is? Lets say the new baseball stadium gets built, then what? We still have the more serious issues around that need attention. A new baseball field.....psh.....There are much more important things that need to be dealt with.

    Posted by: Josh on Feb 13, 2008 at 12:54 PM
    I'm curious to hear Suttle's grand plan. It's probably to keep sinking 15 Million into Rosenblatt forever for 5 year deals. Even the plan to sink $80 million into Rosenblatt is a bad idea. Sure the ballpark would be nice, but there'd still be nothing around it for restaurants and hotels. Can't people see that's what the NCAA wants? FACT: When the city showed them a plan to do $25M in renovations to Rosenblatt back in spring last year, that's when the NCAA wrote back suggesting we look at building a new ballpark downtown. When your spouse suggests something, that's usually what they want. If they wanted to "fix" Rosenblatt or even build new there, they would have said so. BUILD IT DOWNTOWN!!!!

    Posted by: Biil M on Feb 13, 2008 at 12:23 PM
    Larry is correct. Fahey has a one track mind - his way!

    Posted by: larry on Feb 13, 2008 at 11:59 AM
    If Fahey is not behind whatever Suttle has to say, then it won't happen. Thats how a dictatorship works!

    Desktop Weather
  • Video: Hour-by-Hour Forecast Updates
  • AP Online Network
    Health News
  • Family Health
  • Health Check
  • Kids Corner
  • Channel 6 News Features






  • Heartland's Most Wanted
  • Product Recalls

  • Media Partners