Lexington Teacher Fired
Lexington Teacher Fired Save Email Print
Board votes to terminate contract
Reporter: Jamie McCutheon
Email Address: jaime.mccutheon@wowt.com

A | A | A

A Lexington middle school teacher accused of fleeing to Mexico with a 13-year-old student to have sex with the boy has been fired.

The Lexington School Board voted 6-0 to terminate the contract of 25-year-old Kelsey Peterson, a sixth-grade teacher in the system.

Peterson had been put on administrative leave late last month after allegations surfaced that she was having an inappropriate relationship with the student.

Peterson faces a federal charge of crossing state lines to have sex with a minor. She also has been charged in Dawson County with felony counts of kidnapping and child abuse and contributing to the delinquency of a minor.

Peterson's new attorney, Omaha's James Martin Davis, says he questions whether the former student is really 13-years-old.

Peterson is now in a federal detention center in San Diego, California.

So far we haven't heard a response from Peterson's family.

Davis says, "They're concerned about how Kelsey's being portrayed as a monster.” Davis says not an appropriate description of Peterson, no more than he says the word “victim” is a good description of Fernando Rodriguez.

Peterson faces federal and state charges of crossing state lines and the U.S. border to have sex with a minor, which is punishable by 10 years to life in prison and a $250,000 fine.

She has also been charged in Dawson County with felony counts of kidnapping and child abuse and contributing to the delinquency of a minor.

After Peterson was arrested, Fernando Rodriguez stayed in Mexico with family members because he had illlegally come to the U.S. years ago.

"She is not a predator, misguided maybe, but this kid is not a victim,” says Davis. “This kid didn't need protecting from anybody, as opposed to being a victim, I think he was out there talking about this and Kelsey Peterson was a notch on his belt."

"Assuming what she did is true, it's a violation of the law, but she is not a predator and this young man by no means is a victim,” says Davis.

Davis says Rodriguez is no angel. "He isn't a victim, this kid, he's a gangbanger, he's alleged to be in a gang, he's determined to be ungovernable, the kid shaves."

Which leads to another argument Davis plans to pursue. He believes Rodriguez has lied about his age and is older than 13.

“I'm not even sure that he's only 13. He shaves, he has a mustache."

"I'll be requesting his original birth certificate from the Mexican consulate. I think he had one here, but I don't know if anyone vouched for its authenticity."

A prosecutor and a relative of the boy rejected Davis' claims. "Mr. Davis can allege what he wants, I've seen the birth certificate and he's 13," says Dawson County Attorney Elizabeth Waterman.

"He'll be 14 in January," Laura Rodriguez, the boy's aunt told the Associated Press.

As for the boy not being the victim, Rodriguez said of Peterson, "She started up with him when he was 12. She was 24. How could that happen?"

In an interview from Janitizio, Mexico, Rodriguez said he and Peterson had sex "maybe twice" and he considered Peterson his best friend, not a girlfriend.

Davis says a federal grand jury will meet at the courthouse in Omaha this week to formally charge her. After that, she will be extradited to Omaha in the next seven to 21 days.

He is sure Peterson will not be released due to her being considered a flight risk.

"She obviously shaken up, she's incarcerated, you know it was a silly thing for her to do and she recognizes that it was," says Davis.

More Stories
Weather Cooperates For Fireworks Show

Holiday Weekend Fireworks Displays

Fireworks Injury Victim Warns Others

Woman Stabbed Multiple Times

Update: Owner of Pit Bulls Cited

Barking Upsets Neighbors

Historian Follows In Ancestor's Footsteps

Palin Resigns As Alaska Governor

Post Your Comments
First Name:
Location:
Enter Comments: characters left
Email (optional):
By posting this comment I have read and agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy:
You must agree to the Terms of Service to continue.
Read Comments
Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
Posted by: Danion on Nov 15, 2007 at 11:03 AM
Wow, reading this board which is so full of hate and rage towards one race makes me sick. It makes me want to leave Nebraska and never come back. Everyone here should be ashamed of themselves. James Davis should especially feel ashamed. What he is doing is beyond low. When did it become ok to value your pocket book above the lives of other humans? When did this issue become about you? Chances are only 1/4 of a penny will come out of each and every one of your pocket books over this matter so get over it. Please stop hating on this child simply because of his race, and stop worrying about your precious money, it will still be there when you get to the bank. All of you are Scrooges' and clearly are selfish and disgusting creatures.

Posted by: Anonymous on Nov 14, 2007 at 06:30 PM
if he was illegal then how can they charge her for taking him across the border

Posted by: NE Tax Payer on Nov 14, 2007 at 03:41 PM
THIS YOUNG MAN WAS NOT SUPPOSE TO BE HERE ANYWAY, NOW MAKE SURE ALL HIS FAMILY COMES TO THE U.S., AND NOW WE HAVE TO PAY ALL THAT EXPENSE TO... I'M SORRY BUT, LAWS NEED TO BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY, AND THE GOVERMENT BREAKS THEM ALL THE TIME.... NEBRASKA HAS HOMELESS PEOPLE AND THE GOVERMENT IS WORRIED ABOUT PEOPLE THAT SHOULDN'T BE HERE IN THE FIRST PLACE.......WE NEED TO GET OUR PRIORITIES STRAIGHT. LEAVE THE WHOLE BUNCH OF THEM IN MEXICO.. SHE WAS DOING US A FAVOR... 1 DOWN AND MANY TO GO.

Posted by: Henry on Nov 14, 2007 at 11:13 AM
How can a minor be illegal in a country by choice? They cant work so...

Posted by: D on Nov 14, 2007 at 09:23 AM
Shanon)--For me it is hard to fathom that anyone would think it was right for her to have sex with this child. The only way I would look at it differant would be that they do find the child to be 18 0r over. Plus if he was 12 when they started their relationship, (my God what are you thinking)AND as far as her being a mother figure. MOTHERS do not go around having sex with their children unless they are sick too!! IF you condon this kind of behavior how can you blame his mom for anything! If you think any part of that relationship she had was moral or right (having an affair and later sex with a child) then I think you need to seek some help also in understanding bounderies, moral, respect and so on....

Posted by: MB on Nov 14, 2007 at 04:28 AM
Where is dateline NBC to catch a predator?? stone phillips should be here!!

Posted by: shanon on Nov 13, 2007 at 07:59 PM
WRONG! WRONG! WRONG! Why was he never made legal by his parent who had guardianship, his mother never once lifted a finger to do anything about raising this kid since he has been here.If she had then they should make that public!Why was he released to Peterson from a state run facility?Where were his parents when he was running the streets, in jail , court etc.? She had become his mom to an extent as well as gurl and best friend.What part of this is so hard to fathom?

Posted by: Donna on Nov 13, 2007 at 04:19 PM
You want to talk about delinquent kids look all around you. And alot of these punks aren't even hispanic. They are white and black since everyone is making this a racist issue. You people act like only hispanic kids are punks NOT TRUE. If this was a white boy from west Omaha. You would hear oh! the boy has problems or oh! he just needs help! This is his first offense. All BS. What about the perverted child molester BLAIM HER I wish she would of picked a white boy to molest than all the Ignorant people would be saying the opposite.

Posted by: LM on Nov 13, 2007 at 03:38 PM
A teacher is in a position of trust. This teacher violated that trust and has had her contract terminated, and, if proven guilty, should serve the same amount of time in jail as her male predator counterparts. She took advantage of a child--whether he is legal or not is irrelevant to the discussion. Think of your own kids--would you say this was "silly." Really, Mr. Davis, you KNOW the responsibility rests with the person who is the adult.

Posted by: BJ on Nov 13, 2007 at 02:03 PM
BJ Really???? Your son shaves at 13. Oh my God. Is he half wolf???? Take a poll on how many 13 year olds shave.

Posted by: T on Nov 13, 2007 at 01:55 PM
The only thing that idiot JMD is trying to do is to create a little "reasonable doubt" and confusion in this whole screwed up mess. Which, by the way, is only being made worse now that his sorry butt is involved. There is no way this is going to make it to trial - too much publicity and too many people wanting on the jury (including myself). I agree with those stating "what if the sexes in this case were reversed" - you're darn right the guy would be in the slammer with no questions asked. BUT the same laws to be applied to ALL! She deserves to be punished just as any guy would be in the same situation. And as for YOU, James Martin Davis...your client knew the "boy" as a 6th grader and HER STUDENT (to make matters worse). Stop trying to tarnish the facts of the case with your stupid attempt at removing the blame from where it NEEDS to be at - which is on KELSEY PETERSON!

Posted by: tj on Nov 13, 2007 at 12:23 PM
She is a foolish, obviously very lonely person...Come on, she couldn't find someone closer to her age??? The fact that "you can't help who you love" just doesn't fly in this situation...but lets get ALL the facts first. One thing we do know for fact, is that he is here illegally! As for illegal immigration...it has nothing to do with being white, black, hispanic, asian, boy or girl, 13 or 40...it has everything to do with the LAWS! I am SICK SICK SICK of the money allocated towards this failed system, why bother making laws, especially with so many sympothetic people willing to move over and let the aliens...just let them all come over(isn't that right Tim?)

Posted by: C on Nov 13, 2007 at 12:17 PM
Ms. Peterson - was your tryst with a child worth it? You have ruined your life AND your own daughter's life. As a mother, my children are my #1 priority - it's too bad that there are so many poor excuses for parents out there would rather put their own self-indulgent actions before their kids. Children are a blessing and a blessing for which I truly cherish - and there are so many people out there in this world who want kids and can't have them and then have to listen to stories like yours and feel so deeply saddened for those poor kids who get lost in the shuffle of such mixed up lives. What a waste.

Posted by: B on Nov 13, 2007 at 11:49 AM
I'm pretty sure this boy is 13.He was in my sons class in Lexington before we moved to Omaha, and Kelsey is not too bright herself. She is very immature for her age, and it's not suprising to see this happened. I've lived in Lexington all my life and this one sure takes the cake! I hope she gets what she deserves.

Posted by: Suzee on Nov 13, 2007 at 11:30 AM
Wow! First of all, I don't care if he is 13 or 16, Hispanic or American, he is old enough to know the difference between right and wrong and so is the teacher. She sexually abused a boy and that is that! As for his status as a citizen, I don't care how old you are, if you are here illegally and too lazy to become a citizen, you need to be deported until you can respect this country and our laws! It enrages me how people who are not citizens have more rights and priveleges than we do! What is wrong with this country?

Posted by: t on Nov 13, 2007 at 11:02 AM
It sounds like everyone posting messages is missing the point. Who cares if he was mexican, black, white, or candy stripe! Bottom line is, Ms.Peterson broke the law. Even if he is older than 13, she ASSUMED he was only in the sixth grade so that makes her guilty of having sex with a minor, even it was consensual. Her moral standards are not where they should be. What grown adult has sex with a kid, leaves the country and leaves her own kid behind. Obviously she needs some psychological help. Him being illegal is irrelevant to the whole situation. Stop making this an illegal immigrant issue and look at the real situation here. 25 year old teacher takes 13 year old student outside of the country for her own purposes. If she were an illegal mexican and he was a white kid from nebraska would we even be having this conversation?

Posted by: Reality on Nov 13, 2007 at 10:55 AM
I think this goes to show people were a little quick to judge this girl so harshly last week. The boy probably will turn out to be 16 or older (remember when the Far East baseball teams would play in the Little League World Series and they would have kids that were like upper teens or older). He shouldn't be in this country anyhow and Nebraska law enforcement and school officials couldn't seem to figure it out. This was not your typical 13 year old naive kid from West O. As Davis said...the kid's probably a gangbanger.

Posted by: Annette on Nov 13, 2007 at 10:44 AM
The first statement in this article: I don't think she took him to Mexico to have sex with him. That's not what this story sounds like. I think they had sex here in the US. She didn't have to take him to Mexico to have sex with him. There's more to the story. Even if showed interest in her, she, as a teacher, should be the adult here and make the right decision not to act on it. Pleeeease!

Posted by: Alan on Nov 13, 2007 at 10:37 AM
It must be nice to have a case where it's OK to talk these things about a 13 year old. If the 13 year old was a girl, you better believe he would get hammered by politicians, the press, and Oprah for his comments. In that case, he career would pretty much be over. It's sad we have such a double standard today. I for one, think the punishment for sex laws has gotten too tough. However, I think the only way to get them changed is to punish women the same way men are punished for the same crime. That being said, I hope she gets the same punishment a man would get if she is found guilty.

Posted by: Bill on Nov 13, 2007 at 10:31 AM
When people speak about deporting everyone that is "here" illegally, what is behind it? If a person is not otherwise a criminal, what difference does it make to you that someone is trying to make a better life for themselves? do you want your all-white town back or something? and btw this kid is no victim. every normal man would have gladly been such a victim.

Posted by: Michelle on Nov 13, 2007 at 10:17 AM
Amazing how a story about a teacher illegaling having sex with a student has turn into a huge story about illegal aliens. This story is full of illegal conduct - on both sides. Peterson is guilty. Rodriguez is guilty. Rodriguez does not need to be returned to the US to receive his testimony. If they want his testimony, why can't they do a deposition or have him appear by satellite? With all the techonology today, there is no way that is not possible. The family does need to return to Mexico. Laws are laws, and the Rodriguez family broke a federal law and they need to pay the consequences. I don't want to be mean or crude, but in all honesty, if they hadn't broke the law and came here illegaly, there is a strong possibility this never would have happened. I hope this case is treated as an example. Our society and legal system can learn from this.

Posted by: Shannon on Nov 13, 2007 at 09:30 AM
um..... i think she is really wrong for doing that and she should go to prison for that for a long time.

Posted by: E on Nov 13, 2007 at 09:29 AM
Every time I see JMD on the case I have to laugh. Did the teacher really go to him? I think this is just another opportunity for JMD to bring down the Lawyer Profession. There is no wonder that lawyers are not trusted in this country, he has proved it yet again. I understand immigration is a big problem, but just because a boy shaves and is an illegal immigrant, does not make him the bad guy. What she did is wrong, and JMD is defending her? Way to go JD!

Posted by: T on Nov 13, 2007 at 09:18 AM
Good next time a man rapes a 13 yr old girl we can say that he's not a predator and what he did was just silly. I'm so sick a tired of women being treated differntly because they can't be seen as predators. Well she is, she's is an adult and he was 13yrs old...thats statutory rape and she should go to prison just as long if a man had done this to a 13yr old girl.

Posted by: BillyBob on Nov 13, 2007 at 09:11 AM
Seems kinda weird that the only thing people bring up is the fact that he was an illegal. Would this be the case if the teacher was a man and student was a girl ? Probably not huh ? Everybody would be crying to hang the guy. So why isn't this being done w/ her? Oh, and since he's mexican , it seems to be more his fault and now he's a gang banger too according to Davis. Seems pretty low. If the sexes were turned in this story, the teacher would get the book. And shaving and age, nice try Davis, you make yourself look like a fool. I shaved at 14. I hope i get on that jury. Guilty in a heart beat. Laws are laws, no matter what sex or race you are.

Posted by: B on Nov 13, 2007 at 09:06 AM
I don't even have to turn up the volume on the TV to hear JMD to know that nothing but BS is flowing from his lips. Even if the student is a little older - who cares? Peterson still abused her position of authority over her student and it's wrong, wrong, wrong.

Posted by: Anonymous on Nov 13, 2007 at 08:56 AM
What a sad situation when people care more about an illegal immigrant that what really happened here. Bottom line, we should be able to trust teachers with our children. A teacher having sex with a child is a crime. I can't even believe that Mr. Davis would just dismiss this whole thing by saying it was "a silly thing for her to do". She did the crime, now she needs to do the time. As for the boy....leave that up to the immigration department.

Posted by: Martin on Nov 13, 2007 at 08:28 AM
He doesn't have "parents" here. Only his mother, who lives with a boyfriend. His father is back in Mexico.He could testify via video or audio, it isn't necessary for him to return to testify. Sounds as though he doesn't appreciate being in this country anyway, given his incorrigible behavior earlier.

Posted by: That's the problem on Nov 13, 2007 at 08:26 AM
What she did is wrong I do agree with that but come on I don't feel she forced him he is old enough to say no and tell someone but now to keep himself from getting in trouble he will say anything against her to keep himself clean and free everyone talks about being illegal look how many of them live in our state who are illegal but nothing is ever done more and more of them come here and take over our state they don't have to pay taxes they take the jobs they have it made here and I think it's wrong most of them don't even speak english if your going to live here speak english I get so tired of hearing them speak spanish but sure if funny when an amercian ask them a question then they can speak english who we kidding there taking over our country and nothing is being done about it

Posted by: BJ on Nov 13, 2007 at 08:17 AM
What in the world is with JMD. My son needed to shave at 13, does that mean that he was a gang banger. Heaven help us all. He was underage, she was a teacher who should have known better. Case solved. She is guilty! The kid wasn't an angel, but he was definitely underage! Period!

Posted by: GM on Nov 13, 2007 at 08:12 AM
Wow Tim, good one...Let's get one thing straight, if this were A man and A 13yr old girl I would ripping him up one side and down the other. But this is viewed A little different being it is not A man, yeah, double standard I know, but that is just the way it is. To tell you the truth, I think he is older than 13, but still underage yes. And nobody know's the real story yet, not even you! So back off! Don't worry I don't live in South "O"...Holmes

Posted by: BoBo on Nov 13, 2007 at 07:50 AM
O Jimbo finally got his mug in the national news.

Posted by: Tim on Nov 13, 2007 at 07:49 AM
This is exactly what I've been talking about. If cops can screw up on a case where one of their own is the victim, then I certainly don't have much confidence in them being able to correctly handle a case involving the "thugs" in the bad part of town.

Posted by: Mmmmm on Nov 13, 2007 at 07:37 AM
I don't think anyone is saying she should get a free pass because he is illegal. She should absolutely go to jail. I just think that no one feels the Mexican kid should be allowed to return to the US, and probably that his family should also be deported because they are more than likely also illegal. We need to take care of our citizens in need before we take on the rest of the world.

Posted by: Gary on Nov 13, 2007 at 07:31 AM
Welcome to the United States of Mexico! I can't even go to an ATM to get money without having to choose between English/Spanish. I can't call a business without having to listen to both English/Spanish options. Now, they are opening the flood gates to illegal immigrants? Pretty soon, everything is going to be in Spanish. English is going to be the second choice. Wait and see.

Posted by: Pat on Nov 13, 2007 at 07:21 AM
James Martin Davis lost his credibility a long time ago. If you follow his cases and the absurd statements he makes it is comical. People should think twice about hiring this publicity seeking fool.

Posted by: J on Nov 12, 2007 at 10:13 PM
My son was shaving in the 6th grade because he was taking flak about his little mustache. Facial hair isn't a good determinate of age. My earlier silly comment about "Spanish as a 2nd Language" aside, how dare JMD point at a 13 year old and blame a teenager for an adult's actions? If this were a little white girl, NO ONE, and I repeat, NO ONE, would dare to accuse the little white girl of having solicited the relationship. Yet, we look at a Hispanic male and figure he must have caused all the trouble, especially since he's - (dramatic and ominous music) ILLEGAL. Sorry, he may have been a trouble-making brat boy, but the operative word there was boy, and Kelsey Peterson was the adult in this unnatural relationship.

Posted by: shanon on Nov 12, 2007 at 09:06 PM
now that she has Davis as counsel I do not know what to make of this.I supported them in their situation before but the real sharks are going into a frenzy over this one.Instead we need to stop assuming she was taking him across the border for sex .I would assume she was taking him to family in mexico as he had requested and as a friend she was willing to do that for him. If he can be realeased to her from a state run facility then why not be concidered as responsible enough to be a guardian. I would say he was abandoned by his mother who brought him here illegally to begin with when he was very young.I have empathy for the hispanic community because I love a hispanic who came here illegally and he is my husband.We have paid alot of money to make him legal because of a border .It had been 13 years and we are not ripping off the system and get and got to favors.I am now offened that the family of this teen could benefit for their neglect to gain visas or permits to remain here.

Posted by: JO on Nov 12, 2007 at 08:44 PM
I think people are getting off of the subject it does not matter whether he is legal or illegal what she did was WRONG, and people just need to remember that we are all immigrants of some kind.

Posted by: Matt on Nov 12, 2007 at 08:14 PM
JMD kills me... "I'm not even sure he's 13". Davis must get paid a pretty penny to actually make these kinds of statements. I suppose if I had his bankroll I wouldn't have a problem sounding like an idiot either. I'd just go home and relax in my huge bed in my huge house.

Posted by: John on Nov 12, 2007 at 08:01 PM
Who says that they did not know what they were doing? They went into Mexico just one week after immigration statred the new visa program for victims of sex crimes. Was this a plan to be able to get the boy and his family legal status in this country?

Posted by: Questioning Authority on Nov 12, 2007 at 07:26 PM
I wonder if this was there plan the whole time. He figured he would be the victim and would get a free Visa. He gets to come back and his family gets to stay. Sounds like a win-win for him. Just a thought. What kind of law lets law breakers back in the U.S. I would try and cross the border too.

Posted by: Different Stance on Nov 12, 2007 at 07:05 PM
If he has to apply for the new visa, that should then show his true age. In order to alleviate these "loop holes", people need to VOTE to get are current politicians out and replace them with those that are willing to take a stand against this. Many of our political justices house these same illegal immigrants and can't afford to turn back now because of scandal.

Posted by: Jamie on Nov 12, 2007 at 06:51 PM
The comments on here make me laugh. If this were an "American" 13-year-old allegedly victimized by his teacher, you'd be calling her to burn. But since this kid is of mexican descent, you are condoning her behavior. I don't necessarily disagree that his family shouldn't be deported as they were here illegally, but that doesn't lessen the crime Peterson allegedly committed. She took advantage of a child.

Posted by: Julie on Nov 12, 2007 at 06:48 PM
I think if the kid is here illegally he should be kept in Mexico and his parents deported.

Posted by: Keith on Nov 12, 2007 at 06:09 PM
James Martin Davis strikes again. As soon as she was arrested, I thought it would just be a matter of time before "Perry Mason" showed up.

Posted by: jane on Nov 12, 2007 at 05:48 PM
He is a CHILD--forget about the country. SHE is a PREDATOR!

Posted by: B on Nov 12, 2007 at 05:46 PM
You people ought to be ashamed. If this was a WHITE boy, and the teacher took him to another country, or even out of the state, you would be calling her everything but a child of God. So because she decided to take this kid out of the country "she made a bad choice". She's the adult. Bringing this boy back to the US, is the law! You people are always crying foul...when it's a minority as a victim. If you commit a crime, as it seems she did, that boy has EVERY right to be returned to the United States, as he was a victim of sexual assualt, by an adult female. If you think a thirteen year old is old enough to make a decision like this, then rally to change the law, but don't be stratterling the fence. He didn't make this law, YOU DID!!

Posted by: the word is "ILLEGAL" on Nov 12, 2007 at 05:34 PM
I guess it has become "politically correct" to allow the criminal to have more rights than those who follow the law. He came here illegally, now that he is home, he should stay there.

Posted by: BJ on Nov 12, 2007 at 05:21 PM
This kid is only a victim because of his age. Ever see this kid, he looks much older than what he says he is.Who really knows how old he is.All his papers are bogus. His age is probably bogus too. If I remember right there was no amber alert either when he was "kidnapped" and "Raped". Why? When i think of a kidnapping I think of a child screaming and kicking.This didnt happen here. He had plenty of options to leave.He is no victim here. And thid new BS law should not apply. I bet a prior illegal who is now legal wrote this stupid law. Just another way to overpopulate the US.......!

Posted by: Delancey on Nov 12, 2007 at 04:57 PM
As a daughter of an English citizen who immigrated legally, I can understand the outrage regarding illegal immigrants. However, we are talking about a 13 year old child who is now separated from his parents and stuck in a country he knows nothing about. If it were your child wouldn't you want to be reunited? Besides the fact, this family broke US law to make a better live them and their children. The real criminals here are the President of Mexico Felipe Calderon, and former President Vicente Fox. Neither of these men have improved the economic conditions in Mexico or provided any type of the relief from crushing poverty most of their citizens live in. Can you blame them for coming over the border? NAFTA is a joke, and has not benefitted Mexican citizens.

Posted by: J on Nov 12, 2007 at 04:19 PM
To Rose: I'm sure that the Mexican government will provide "Spanish as a Second Language" classes for poor Fernando, considering as how he is a true citizen of that country and he is their true responsibility.

Posted by: Tim on Nov 12, 2007 at 04:07 PM
Wow, GM, its kind of scary that the worst thing you can come up with when talking about an adult having sex with a 13 year old is that they made a "bad choice". Please tell me you don't live in the same neighborhood as my nieces!

Posted by: B on Nov 12, 2007 at 03:57 PM
Looks like our government is going to create all kinds of loopholes/exceptions until everyone is over here "legally". Not good......

Posted by: Tim on Nov 12, 2007 at 03:49 PM
Amazing. Everybody was feeling sorry for this kid and condeming this teacher...Until they found out he was an ILLEGAL (always in capital letters but I don't know why). Now, once we find out that he may get to stay here legally, people become outraged and now the kid is a willing participant. What's wrong with having a little compassion? The kid was 13, should we punish him for mistakes his family made? What about the badly burned Iraqi boy who was allowed to come to the US to get surgery? Is that just a loophole also? I suggest you people get together and set the ground rules...Just lay out exactly how much suffering and abuse a person needs to go through before they can be allowed to have the almighty LEGAL (always in capital letters but I don't know why) status.

Posted by: Cindy on Nov 12, 2007 at 03:32 PM
I have to agree that this kid is NOT a victim and he should not be alowed back into this country just to break more of our laws. Send his family to him, not the other way around.

Posted by: What is wrong on Nov 12, 2007 at 03:01 PM
99% of the comments on here support sending him & his family back but as usual the law abiding citizens have no say in the way the law works: In favor of the criminals.... why we would be dying for a juvenile delinquent to stay is beyond me!

Posted by: k on Nov 12, 2007 at 02:51 PM
You know what maybe you people should learn up on the subject of immigration before you come on a local news page and degrade illegal immigrants as if their not even people. My husband and i have been trying to do it the legal way with an immigration lawyer it's been two years and nothings happened. Have you ever stopped to think about anyone other then yourselves? Have you ever stopped to think that maybe they wouldn't have survived if they'd stayed in Mexico? Have you ever thought that maybe they came here to make a better life for themselves? Maybe you should stop and think before you speak. Also maybe you should look at the actual situation at hand such as this 25 year old us citizen teacher running off with her 13 year old student, If you think that a woman like that deserves to be in this country then why dont the people who aren't doing you or anyone else any harm, besides the fact that their immigrants?

Posted by: Vickie on Nov 12, 2007 at 02:31 PM
Give me a break, leave the illegal in Mexico and send his entire family back with him, put the teacher in prison, she's a pedifile, we don't need the kid to testify, the whole world knows what she did, after all; didn't she tell them when she was arrested that she was in love. She already admitted what she did, and this is federal, they do what they want anyway, they don't need anyone to testify, let alone an illegal kid.

Posted by: Anonymous on Nov 12, 2007 at 02:24 PM
I hate hearing about illegals in the US and now hearing that we are letting one back into this country. That is not a innocent, vulnerable kid that was hurt by an American woman, he knew what he was doing...He played her and he played it that he has a free pass to come back to the US. He is not a kid with a great future, keep him along with his family in Mexico!

Posted by: E on Nov 12, 2007 at 02:21 PM
Oh heck no! He went with her willingly, and he willingly went back into Mexico. He should stay home (in Mexico). If he wants to come back to America, then he needs to get in line at the border and cross LEGALLY (which he probably cant do till he's 18) Mexicans should take care of Mexico, rather than stick America with their problems...we have enough of our own problems, we dont need Mexico's too.

Posted by: common sense on Nov 12, 2007 at 01:22 PM
The teacher, Miss Peterson, thoughtfully took her dog and the "boy she loved" on her cross-border trip. But what about her poor child back in Nebraska. She is not a parent. She is not a teacher. No true parent or teacher would do what she did. Save OUR money, lock her up and keep him in Mexico!

Posted by: Ernie Chambers on Nov 12, 2007 at 12:57 PM
What kind of message are we sending people?

Posted by: Ernie Chambers on Nov 12, 2007 at 12:55 PM
"It's a win-win," U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services spokeswoman Marilu Cabrera said of the so-called "U" visa. I DON'T THINK SO!!!!! HE SHOULD STAY IN MEXICO!!!!

Posted by: BoBo on Nov 12, 2007 at 12:43 PM
By the time this goes to trial this manchild will already be back in the US illegally.

Posted by: BJ on Nov 12, 2007 at 12:35 PM
The kid was an illegal citizen. He had no right to be here. He was a criminal.It was against the law for him to be here. And now we are letting him come back? Will this allow all the murderers and rapists to return to society too? Doing something illegal, no matter what it is, is still illegal. And now he is getting rewarded for it. Go figure.

Posted by: GM on Nov 12, 2007 at 12:05 PM
So were gonna give a mexican illeagal and his family A free visa to testify against an american citizen that just made A bad choice. Don't seem right. Not sure it was A bad choice taking him back there in the first place.

Posted by: chris on Nov 12, 2007 at 12:04 PM
He came here illegaly he left the same way. He is with family in HIS country. Leave him there. If he needs his mommy, send her back where she belongs to.

Posted by: SICK OF ILLEGALS on Nov 12, 2007 at 11:51 AM
NO WAY - he should NOT be allowed back into the USA - he has already proved he can't behave himself here. Why was he sent to the Boys Ranch for unruly kids in the first place? His mom and the rest of his family need to be sent back too - they are here ILLEGALLY. If I was a juror in this case (when it goes to trial) I would not believe a word of what this kid testifies too, he is going to say what he needs to say to stay here in the USA and that is not right.

Posted by: E on Nov 12, 2007 at 11:50 AM
Well...I hope they deport the rest of his family because I am sure he wasnt' the only one in that household who was illegal. If they do that maybe he will stay in Mexico. We need to actually up hold the law & let people come & stay in this country ONLY if they do it LEGALLY. Our economy can't support us & the all of the illegals...they come here & get free education, healthcare & whatever else they want & really arent' worried about being deported & if they can't follow the rules of our country they shouldn't be here.

Posted by: Steve on Nov 12, 2007 at 11:05 AM
Better yet, leave him in Mexico and send the family back there to be with him. Why are these fools trying to bring an illegal alien back to Lexington? How about using those resources to sweep Lexington and clean up that town!

Posted by: Ss on Nov 12, 2007 at 11:03 AM
Great so he is not all that inocent and probably persude her and he gets to come back here. This well help the imagration issue we have. She is WRONG but that is not going to make the situation right..

Posted by: confused on Nov 12, 2007 at 10:56 AM
Just a thought....HE WENT WITH HER ON HIS OWN ACCOUNT. I know what she did was completely wrong and uncalled for, but before we start calling him the victim let's remind ourselves that he could've told someone. HE DIDN'T! He went willingly with her. I think she needs lots of time in jail and he needs to stay with his family in Mexico where he evidently wanted to go anyway.

Posted by: Elaine on Nov 12, 2007 at 10:40 AM
How can we give him legal citizenship because he had a crime committed against him. Every illegal citizen will be looking for someone to victimize them to attain legal status.

Posted by: Larry on Nov 12, 2007 at 10:16 AM
Victim? This kid is not a victim. Take a look at his past actions and his record. He in not innocent here and they both should be sharing the consequences of their actions. Its discpicable.

Posted by: Rose on Nov 12, 2007 at 10:12 AM
People are acting like this boy is a criminal and should be banned from the u.s. as if he commited some crime. The boy does not even know how to speak spanish and has been in the U.S. most of his life. He is not a U.S. Citizen that does not mean he should suffer in a country he does not know and does not understand the language.

Posted by: tom on Nov 12, 2007 at 10:10 AM
I do feel the boy should be reunited with his family...but lets make it in Mexico...if they were not legal prior to this, why should they be now...I don't believe for a second that this boy was made to do anything he didn't want to.

Posted by: Dave on Nov 12, 2007 at 10:09 AM
Great! There go more of my tax dollars!

Posted by: Old S.O. boy on Nov 12, 2007 at 10:01 AM
Lets find a new law in the oil industry to where US CITIZENS only have to pay .20 for gas, or lets find a new law that that allows us US CITIZENS to be income tax emempt for 10 years, or lets find a new law that allow US CITIZENS to travel the country free. Sound absolutely stupid? So does the a LAW that actually allows illegal immigrants who GOT CAUGHT being here illegally to come back here again and stay. Open all the borders... fire all the border patrols... because we are never ever going to stop the entry of immigrants into OUR country.What a big fat joke........ Loop holes will destroy us. Re-write the law books.

Posted by: Nikki on Nov 12, 2007 at 09:22 AM
Once again, I am amazed! This boy was here illegally along with his parents, who I might mention are still here illegally, and this new law is going to allow him to come back here. He was not a victim, he was a willing participant, who's family allowed him to spend time with this teacher outside of school. They are both guilty and I do not think that he should be allowed to come back here, nor do I think his parents should be allowed to stay either. Lets just reward them for being here illegally. Enough is enough.

Posted by: W on Nov 12, 2007 at 09:21 AM
It is a shame that if you are an ILLEGAL immigrant you get taken care of but if you are a poor american you get nothing. the day shelter for the homeless has to fight to get funds but there is money to spare to fight for ILLEGALS. I feel no sorrow for this WILLING participant that ended up in the country he is a citizen, a country that treats ILLEGALS worse than we do. Veterans can't afford medical care, Senior citizens can't afford care, Poor can't afford food but there is money for people that are ILLEGALS. Lets take care of LEGAL immigrants and LEGAL citizens first, THEN if there is money left we can help others.

Posted by: Jarbeau on Nov 12, 2007 at 08:05 AM
This is wrong and stupid. He is not needed to convict her and he was nothing but trouble when he was in Nebraska. Keep him in Mexico where he belongs. Perhaps we should give his family an all expense paid trip home also.

Posted by: John on Nov 12, 2007 at 07:20 AM
Why wasn't this kid caught and deported the first time he went through the welfare system?

Posted by: Ryan on Nov 12, 2007 at 06:28 AM
I can really see this new loophole getting exploited. What sense does it make to bring the kid back into the very country he was sexually abused in. Sounds like he'd be safer in Mexico.

Posted by: John on Nov 12, 2007 at 06:17 AM
If indeed Rodriguez has been a victim in this case why would he come back? At best he was the victim of a crime while he was committing a crime. The crime being in the U.S. illegally. The real question is, why hasn't the whole Rodriguez family been deported.

Posted by: Sickandtired on Nov 12, 2007 at 04:38 AM
Why not send the entire family to him since they are probably all illegal, rather than bringing him back here?

Special Sections