Mayors Shed Light On Pedestrian Bridge Project
Mayors Shed Light On Pedestrian Bridge Project Save Email Print
Span to spur development on both sides of the river

A | A | A

Mayors of Omaha and Council Bluffs will celebrate the completion of the tall pylons of the new pedestrian bridge that will span the Missouri River between the two cities.

The pylons were illuminated Thursday night during a "topping off" ceremony.

It's a project that's been more than 10 years in the making. Two hundred feet above the water, the pedestrian bridge stands to become a focal point of two river cities and those who like to walk along the Missouri River.

“The Omaha side seems to be developing really nicely,” says Julie Ekstrum of Omaha. “I really look forward to seeing what Iowa has to offer."

Omaha does have some elaborate plans, including a $2 million plaza, plus another high-rise tower of luxury condos at Riverfront Place. “Fifteen-story building with 56 condominiums," says Ben Proctor of NP Dodge. “All the homes themselves will have balconies, view of the Missouri River, the pedestrian bridge and the city skyline."

Over in Council Bluffs, development is trickier because a quarter-mile of the riverfront sits in a flood plane.

“What we'd like to do is develop a park atmosphere, performing arts, somewhere you could get out, soccer field, baseball diamonds, something where you can run up and down the river," says Council Bluffs Mayor Tom Hanafan.

City leaders say the pedestrian bridge will bring big strides for both communities. “If it causes some sort of economic development in the long run it will be worthwhile, but that's yet to be seen,” says Eckstrum.

Some other plans include more development in Council Bluffs, including housing and commercial space.

Restaurants on both sides of the river will open for business sometime after the bridge opens in November of next year.

More Stories
Court: Omaha Drug Bust Illegal

Girl Rescued From Pool Doing Better

Driver Gets Probation In Teen's Death

Motorcyclist Killed In Crash

Holiday Enforcement Nabs Drunk Drivers

Lake Assault Could Bring Charges

Omaha Senator Considers Run For Congress

Report: Plane Quit, Restarted, Quit & Crashed

Post Your Comments
First Name:
Location:
Enter Comments: characters left
Email (optional):
By posting this comment I have read and agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy:
You must agree to the Terms of Service to continue.
Read Comments
Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
Posted by: Chris on Oct 5, 2007 at 06:51 PM
To all those haters, I will gladly pay your share of tax money that is building this bridge and the new stadium that you don't support. In return, you can pay my share of the West Dodge Expressway and Iraq War that I don't support. Sound fair?

Posted by: Cathy on Oct 5, 2007 at 05:39 PM
Why would anyone want to go visit the dirty Missouri River? It's not clean enough to even attract people. The bridge to be built is just another place for the homeless to go and view the beautiful river!

Posted by: Sick of people that dont know facts on Oct 5, 2007 at 05:24 PM
The bridge does not end in the flood plain; it ends on top of the levee, which is a bike trail the runs from harrahs north by the missouri river chute and will have nature trails and pedestrian paths. Also if people were so inclined to "jump off the bridge" they'd do it on the bridge from cb to omaha we have NOW! It isn't like no one noticed that there are 2 train bridges and 2 highway bridges before and now that the pedestrian bridge is opening, all the jumpers are going to come out of the woodwork. Federal tax dollars are paid for by all americans; they allocate dollars for highways, bridges, trails, etc, and ANY city/state can apply for these pre-collected funds. Why shouldnt omaha get it? Someone else would otherwise. Council bluffs has plans for residential/business on the iowa side, potentially from a 'great places' grant. Why dont those of you who hear tid-bits do research before making 'informed' opinions based on what you heard from people who are as uninformed as you!

Posted by: Joe on Oct 5, 2007 at 04:59 PM
Jason from Norfolk, I live 2 blocks from were the bridge comes on the Iowa side and I do not need flood insurance. So I do not know were your getting your facts.

Posted by: terry on Oct 5, 2007 at 04:58 PM
I don't plan on using this bridge, and I haven't met anyone interested in using it. I think it is a waste, and will attract criminals, and suicide peeps. That part of town is not built up or safe enough.

Posted by: S on Oct 5, 2007 at 03:52 PM
Well put, Glen. Long term vision seems to be lacking in all the crying going on.

Posted by: Terry on Oct 5, 2007 at 02:44 PM
Response to Josh - do you think 'Fed" money is created out of thin air? Our taxes provide that "fed" money. 19 million of "fed" money for a barely used foot bridge is Omaha's equivalent to the Alaksa "Bridge to Nowhere"

Posted by: DB on Oct 5, 2007 at 02:32 PM
We need this bridge. Several times a week I have this overwhelming urge to walk to Iowa. I mean, for crying out loud, its Iowa! I want to walk there. Build this bridge already!

Posted by: VICKIE on Oct 5, 2007 at 12:25 PM
I HOPE WE BUILD A PARKING LOT ON THE CB SIDE FOR THE NEW STADIUM, BECAUSE THAT IS MY NEIGHBORHOOD AND I'D RATHER MY PARK BECOME A PARKING LOT THAN NEW LOW INCOME HOUSING WE DON'T WANT.

Posted by: Josh on Oct 5, 2007 at 12:12 PM
No John, Fed money is paying for 19 out of 22 million. The remaining 3 million came from private orgs like the Iowa West Foundation. Gallup is paying to light the bridge. Please do some research before forming your opinions.

Posted by: Jim on Oct 5, 2007 at 11:46 AM
I love the idea of this bridge. Another destination for people that doesn't involve drinking. All of the people on here complaining about any progress really should look at what options a growing city has compared to those that do nothing. I have lived in Omaha just 4 years, but I can see how much progress is being made to try and attract young people here and to keep them here. If you are so opposed to tax dollars being wasted, support ending the war in Iraq.

Posted by: ricksplendid on Oct 5, 2007 at 11:45 AM
I cant wait for this bridge to open! It is going to be so much easier for me to jump into the Missouri River after losing all of my money at the casino! Way to go Omaha!

Posted by: W on Oct 5, 2007 at 11:20 AM
To Bryan, you need to remember that majority rules in a democracy and most of the people think this is a bad thing. It is a shame theat the individual is revered more then the society anymore. I am not against moving forward but am against change for change sake. This is another project where form beats function. 400,00 people in the area and how many will actually use the bridge, or the new stadium?

Posted by: Steve on Oct 5, 2007 at 11:17 AM
This is what will happen. People will lose a ton of money at the casinos (mostly Nebraskans), will go to the middle of the bridge, jump into the river & law enforcement will have to rescue these idiots. WHAT A WASTE OF MONEY!

Posted by: Anonymous on Oct 5, 2007 at 11:06 AM
federal money paid for $16M of the $25M bridge. 16/25 is 64%, hardly small.

Posted by: Michelle on Oct 5, 2007 at 10:30 AM
how many times have you driven over 480 to see folks walking or riding bikes?? This should help eliminate the potential of someone getting hurt or killed.

Posted by: John P. on Oct 5, 2007 at 10:30 AM
So basically the idea I get from reading all of you people's comments is that Omahan's aren't mature enough to handle having a pedestrian bridge? That all we are going to do is deal dope then jump off the bridge? GIVE ME A BREAK! You all make me sick with your negativity.

Posted by: Glen on Oct 5, 2007 at 10:27 AM
I'm amazed by all the negativity! I was raised in another city that took a long-term view of riverfront development. Some projects were obviouly good and some were questionable. But now, the value and pride of the whole development is much bigger than the sum of the parts. I really believe efforts like this on both sides of the river will really come together in a meaningful way. Have a little vision and faith.

Posted by: cw on Oct 5, 2007 at 10:01 AM
boy we like to waste money!! Were going to light the towers, what a nice waste of energy.

Posted by: L on Oct 5, 2007 at 09:54 AM
Lets name the Bridge "CRIME BRIDGE" because thats exactly what its going to be. Where is someone going to go when some criminal comes up and demands whatever....If we jump we die....if we fight we die...BECAUSE THERE IS NOT GOING TO BE ANYWHERE FOR A VICTIM TO ESCAPE!!! Really smart Omaha!!!! The crime rate in this city is sooooo bad now just another place for criminals to hang out for their next victim.

Posted by: Pete on Oct 5, 2007 at 09:08 AM
Another waste of money..This town along with it's politicans are a major JOKE!!

Posted by: Progressive on Oct 5, 2007 at 09:05 AM
And just to think, maybe having this bridge to walk or bike will help drive more "suburbanites" out of their homes and out towards the Downtown area to lose some of the weight they've gained while commuting to work everyday. Or wait, that's a progressive thought, all of the people that have posted here (except for Josh) seem to think that any of Fahey's ideas are bad for the city. Let me guess we should have used this money to expand Pacific, Center and Maple Streets to 10 lanes so you wouldn't have to sit in traffic. At least let those people that live in the urban parts of the Omaha Metro have something for once... oh wait, who the heck lives Downtown anyway right, when you can live in cozy Elkhorn - oops I mean West Omaha! Hee Hee!

Posted by: S on Oct 5, 2007 at 08:59 AM
Bryan - why do you think that Western Nebraska is all "Backwards thinkers"? Could it be that you haven't visited there recently? There are forward & backwards thinkers in every part of our state. Please don't perpetuate the predjudice against the western part of our state. Omaha is moving forward with many good things, but so is the rest of our state.

Posted by: John on Oct 5, 2007 at 08:03 AM
Bryan, I live near downtown. It's obvious that you have no idea what it is like in East Omaha. I don't see anyhting progressive about milking local tax payers for projects that will only attract crime and make the area even more dangerous. Josh, federal funds are only paying a small part of the cost of this bridge.

Posted by: John C on Oct 5, 2007 at 07:59 AM
The fans I talk to from visiting teams love #1 Omaha's freindly atmosphere #2 LET THERE BE NO MISTAKE - Rosenblatt. We still don't know what the Bridge to nowhere will cost us to build, maintain and tear down when it becomes unsafe. Already the original figure has ballooned and nothing has every been built for what they propose... 2% sales tax isn't much if you're a millionaire.

Posted by: Eric on Oct 5, 2007 at 06:00 AM
Sure am glad I live in Bellevue and only have local stuff to worry about. Glad you all are up to paying for this, I retire in four years and am outta here...

Posted by: jj on Oct 4, 2007 at 11:40 PM
so will it be named Faheys Foot Trail?

Posted by: Josh on Oct 4, 2007 at 10:52 PM
Again, this was funded by FEDERAL tax dollars that Bob Kerrey landed for us. We are are going to keep paying fed tax dollars. I for one am glad we get to see something for it. This money could have gone to Nashville or some other place, I'm greatfull we got the money. This is a great project that many people will use for biking and walking on trails. Seems like some just want to complain about Mayor Fahey in any way they can.

Posted by: Bryan on Oct 4, 2007 at 10:36 PM
Are all you people afraid of "new ideas" that are helping to turn a once deserted and trashy area of Omaha into a nice area. Or are you all stuck in the suburbs, taking care of your McMansions at 220th and Dodge and so scared to death of Downtown that you never even drive near the area. The money that was used for this project was Federal Tax Dollars, meaning that if we didn't use them, they would have went to benefit another city's "forward thinking" project. Oh well, all of you should just move out of Omaha anyway and go down to cities that aren't trying to move up in the world... like Detroit or St. Louis. Actually those cities are spending money to improve their cities as well with little nice things like this Pedestrian Bridge. If you don't like it, then move to Lincoln or better yet, Western Nebraska and join the other "backward thinkers" there. We need more progressive minded citizens in this town, it's us that have helped make this town a better place to live and work in.

Posted by: mb on Oct 4, 2007 at 09:34 PM
just another bridge to jump off of. Good idea. I hope it is caged in.

Posted by: Jim on Oct 4, 2007 at 08:49 PM
A footbridge to swamps in Iowa filled with mosquitoes. Are we now going to build a second stadium that no one goes to? When is the foolishness and waste of taxpayer money going to stop?

Posted by: BoBo on Oct 4, 2007 at 08:15 PM
Come election time when you cast your ballot the senate I hope you remeber that this is the brainchild of Bozo Bob Kerrey.

Posted by: vic on Oct 4, 2007 at 07:50 PM
I hope there will be some type of protective covering over the bridge or the city will have to add a few more police officers to watch for jumpers.

Posted by: Jason on Oct 4, 2007 at 07:42 PM
The bridge is a great idea....Transients and homeless need an easy way across the river.

Posted by: Bill on Oct 4, 2007 at 07:35 PM
Now watch Council Bluffs build a parking garage near the pedestrian bridge to make money off the rediculously expensive baseball stadium.

Posted by: reality check on Oct 4, 2007 at 07:26 PM
Just another stupid fahey idea. Stupid then and stupid now.

Posted by: Jason on Oct 4, 2007 at 07:05 PM
The bridge ends on the Council Bluffs side in a quarter-mile flood plane. That was good planning...

Special Sections