Fahey Proposes New Tax To Fund Stadium Plan
Fahey Proposes New Tax To Fund Stadium Plan Save Email Print
2% entertainment tax on deck

A | A | A

Omaha Mayor Mike Fahey is proposing an entertainment tax to help fund a new baseball stadium that he says could cost up to $120 million. City council members were briefed on the plan Thursday.

Financing for a new stadium would be a private/public split with much of the public money coming from a 2% entertainment tax on prepared food, drinks, movies, plays and parking in Omaha. The tax would raise an estimated $3 million a year.

Five months ago, city hall told us a new downtown stadium would cost more than $50 million. The mayor is now telling members of the city council it’s more like $95-$120 million.

"We were in there well over an hour-and-a-half." Councilman Garry Gernandt isn't likely to be swayed by any new stadium pitch since he helped organize the "Save Rosenblatt" group.

For him, this isn't a political decision. ”I was outnumbered, let's say about 11 to one, 11 people that are fighting like crazy to get this thing built and me in there to save Rosenblatt."

Mayor Fahey briefed the council in twos and threes, confident when the facts are known there's only one answer and that is to build the stadium.

"There are so many rumors out there right now, this is the first time we actually had a kind of an in dollar amount and the payment financing mechanism that we're contemplating installing," says Fahey, who does not want the tax put to a public vote.

That troubles at least one city councilman. "It's a real difficult decision for the city council because the public wants to vote on this, the public's not going to get a vote on this,” says Chuck Siegerson.

"The mayor pointed out to us that other cities want the College World Series. There is nothing sacred about us having this forever, so we need to be thinking, are we willing to sacrifice something to hang onto this College World Series for a very long period of time?"

“It's the mayors decision what the public’s going to see," says Siegerson. "Do we want to vote a 2% tax and if we pass that tax, the public's going to say this is a tax-and-spend-council and if we don't pass the tax, the mayor’s plan goes down the tube and we could possibly lose the College World Series."

Last month, the mayor announced the city and NCAA agreed on a plan to build a new stadium north of the Qwest Center and in return, the NCAA would extend the contract to keep the CWS in Omaha for up to an additional 20 years.

"I don't really have an opinion on that,” says Jeremy Jorgenson of Omaha. “I know you have to pay for that somehow as long as the revenues eventually build the community, I think that's great."

"We're one of the highest taxed states and I don't like it, but I want to keep Rosenblatt,” said another man. “It's closer to where I live, it's got a lot of, just a lot of ambiance about it, you know?"

The whole issue could hinge on Mayor Fahey's next pitch, to the public. He’s having a news conference Friday at 10:30 a.m.

It's unlikely he'll have firmer numbers by Friday for the cost of a new stadium. Much of that will be in the details of design which they don't yet have and how much the private donations will be, and that's anybody's guess.

More Stories
Fireworks Show Threatened By Rain

Holiday Weekend Fireworks Displays

Fireworks Injury Victim Warns Others

Woman Stabbed Multiple Times

Update: Owner of Pit Bulls Cited

Barking Upsets Neighbors

Historian Follows In Ancestor's Footsteps

Palin Resigns As Alaska Governor

Post Your Comments
First Name:
Location:
Enter Comments: characters left
Email (optional):
By posting this comment I have read and agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy:
You must agree to the Terms of Service to continue.
Read Comments
Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
Posted by: Dennis on Feb 26, 2008 at 07:52 PM
Don't we live in an democratic society Don't we have the right to vote anymore mayor fahey needs to realize that he is an elected public servant we the people of omaha and and surrounding areas need to watch very carefully who we elect into public office.mayor Fahey cares nothing about the people of omaha all he cares about is filling the pockets of those small circle of bigshots that will certainly benefit from the kickback they'll get from construction of this stadium at tax payers expense.

Posted by: Fred on Feb 20, 2008 at 02:55 PM
We need to get Fidel Fahey recalled immediately. We can not have a Boston Tea Party, but we can recall the Mayor.

Posted by: Thomas on Jan 16, 2008 at 11:07 PM
I have lived in this Tax me to death town for 42yrs at the same address, in that time 29 years ago the tax me state has re-black-topped my street one time, I have seen a city snow plow drive up my street once in the last twenty years, not plowing the street but just using this street to get to another, I have noticed, as you will too once the snow is gone, take a look around. Every street corner, every curb line, and every interstate fence line is full of trash, never to be cleaned up. I havent seen a street cleaner on my street for at least 25 to 30 yrs. The police do nothing about abandoned cars or cars parked illegaly with no plates or In-Transits, It is against the law to park any car or truck on a public street even with dealership In-Transits, yet they are everywhere. I have called the Mayors office for more than two weeks straight on an abandoned, wrecked, non plated truck in front of my house not move once in that time, your Tax dollar at work. Nebraska the place to leave.

Posted by: Kay on Oct 6, 2007 at 11:42 AM
When is Fahey's term up? We can all put a stop to the tax me to death. Vote for someone else, and pray. They all lie.

Posted by: Russell Fulton on Oct 5, 2007 at 10:33 PM
Citizens: not a week goes by when our public pulse does not have a letter about how high our taxes are. Now, we are presented a plan for MORE of our tax dollars going to a Stadium that we probably could do without, plus the Taxpayers(US) are not to vote on such a thing. Too costly he says. Costly is a $117 million dollar ballpark!

Posted by: Kenneth on Oct 5, 2007 at 10:26 PM
Entertainment Tax for "FAHEY'S FOLLY" -- I'm from Iowa but in Omaha fairly frequently. -- At that rate I can find very nice, clean,excellent cusine on the Iowa side -- also other good entertainment (beside casinos) and without the tax. I would HOPE that, if this foolishness (and unsolicited Omaha bondage) goes through (without popular electorate approval) that thereis, at least a firm, binding,undefaultable contract signed by the NCAA before so much as $1 is spent -- they muscled their way into the College World Series and wrested control by Omaha default and now want to move it. I have no real assurance that they won't do so anyway on any pretext -- F. Folly or not, reported promises or not -- Bilateral political lies, I think! -- whose personal/political/power gain(s)!?! I wonder (not much)

Posted by: Claudia on Oct 5, 2007 at 10:13 PM
Just another one of Fayhey's Follies. Heaven hElp us if he gets elected to any other ofice, in either our city or any other office. He's just to busy making a name for himself, rather than doing any good for this city.Making himself a joke is more like it.

Posted by: Justin on Oct 5, 2007 at 07:15 PM
I do not agree with this tax one bit, not to mention I do not agree with building a new stadium. Taxes of Nebraska pushed me across the river, everything is cheaper there; from gas and cigarettes to eating a nice dinner with your family. I do not understand why the Mayor of Omaha wants to spend millions of dollars the city DOES NOT have for a new stadium, espicially when we have the gun crime problems this city has. 3-5 shootings a night, in North Omaha? But its ok to brush those off and worry about spending 95-125 MILLION dollars because he thinks everybody in this city can afford it. I feel that the NCAA is not going to pull the CWS out of Omaha, its a tradition here in Omaha, as long as we keep upgrading the present stadium the way the NCAA wants it to be done. I think its time the Mayor of Omaha starts worrying about something else besides raising taxes for a stadium that is not needed.

Posted by: John on Oct 5, 2007 at 07:12 PM
The 120 million for a new stadium is only the start. There's the 13 million left on the renovations of Rosenblatt that the zoo says they're not able to spend to by the site. Then comes the construction of the new stadium. Who would be the contractor for it? Someone from Kansas City or Denver? If it is awarded to a Omaha contractor that would be better but cost over runs come with incomplete plans for building and as quick as this is being proposed, they'll be a ton of change orders to the construction that will guarantee cost over runs. Why dont we send Fahey a bill for 2% of our home value and say "sorry, you dont get a choice if you want to pay this or not, you dont get to vote on the bill I sent to you"

Posted by: Linda on Oct 5, 2007 at 06:09 PM
Just say NO to any new taxes!! Enough already, get corporations to fund the project, and increase the ticket prices of those that use the facility.

Posted by: William on Oct 5, 2007 at 06:07 PM
I am opposed to any new taxes to pay for improvements on the existing stadium or to fun the construction of a new statium. WE PAY TOO MUCH IN TAXES ALREADY!! Find a way to have those that use or benefit (local businesses) fund the project. Quit taxing the little guy!!!

Posted by: Jamie on Oct 5, 2007 at 06:03 PM
To mike telling everyone to move. If that was the case then there would be nobody left in Omaha and also not everyone can afford to move. Think about it smart one

Posted by: Craig on Oct 5, 2007 at 05:46 PM
"Five months ago, city hall told us a new downtown stadium would cost more than $50 million. The mayor is now telling members of the city council it’s more like $95-$120 million" Save rosenblatt, Save Omaha, Recall Fahey!

Posted by: martin on Oct 5, 2007 at 05:45 PM
When I see something I want and would improve my life, but my budget doesn't have room for it and I have spent too much on credit already, then I don't get it. And no vote on an imposed tax? Isn't that part of what led to a little conflict known as The American Revolution?? Shelf the stadium for later or put the tax to a vote. We are not being represented, we are being shoved around.

Posted by: c.j. on Oct 5, 2007 at 05:25 PM
this is pathetic to see the taxes go up yet again because of a new stadium! not to mention all the other renovations he has yet to complete.If he listened to the people this town would be twice as good as it is right now

Posted by: Jeff on Oct 5, 2007 at 05:24 PM
Just what we need another way for the City of Omaha to take a working person's dollar and spend it on something we don't really need. If this concept of a new stadium had never been brought up in the first place chances are we still could have got a longer term contract because there is still plenty of room to renovate and expand at Rosenblatt Stadium currently. If parking is a concern build parking garages, if restraunts are a concern buy some of the homes in the area that are run down and re-develop the property for commerical use. There are more options that need to be explored, not just build a new stadium and CREATE new non-necessary taxes just to fund a project that we can't afford.

Posted by: Ditto on Oct 5, 2007 at 04:51 PM
To Pat: Ditto! There ARE plenty of wealthy people residing here and do NOTHING to help the city of Omaha. I for one, am sick of the Tax Me mentality of this city. The posters are correct, in the grand scheme of things, 2% is small amount; however, if I can not afford something, then I wait and save my money or go without. Who is going to pay off the 13 mil on the Blatt? What about the Qwest? It is just a matter of time before the Civic is dust and rubble.This spend, spend mentality of this city needs to stop. It is a bigger issue than the 2% tax. No vote; more debt; and yet another temporary tax I will be still paying in 20 years!!! I hope Mr Fahey has enjoyed his last few years in office because I think next election we will see a new mayor.

Posted by: Randy on Oct 5, 2007 at 04:20 PM
Taxes, Taxes, Taxes, Taxes, Taxes, Taxes!! THIS IS NEBRASKA, NOT CALIFORNIA? I thought the state modo was "THE GOOD LIFE"? Give me a break, first a wheel tax, then the Qwest Center, a dumb bridge, then a 30% raise in Property values, Now another tax for a stadium after we just underwent renovations a few years ago on the old? When will it end! I can barely make ends meet now! Somebody end Fahey's spending spree NOW!!!

Posted by: Elizabeth on Oct 5, 2007 at 03:36 PM
Carey: The number of seats in the proposed new stadium is projected to be about 2/3 of the current seating at Rosenblatt. Explain how THAT will increase the numbers of people who come to the CWS. Less people come, less people spend money there, more taxes for the poor schmucks who already are overtaxed by Fahey and his wealthy cadre of buddies. Why don't we focus on the poor here and the homeless, and why don't we take care of the crumbling infrastructure of this city instead of creating more fluff? I can go elsewhere to eat and spend. I WILL NOT be paying 2% more. Next it will be 4% and so on. Dan Welch, you don't represent me, you betrayed me. You'd better find a "real" job, because you will NEVER see another vote from me!

Posted by: Mike on Oct 5, 2007 at 03:06 PM
All I am reading is negative...I've got a solution...MOVE!!!

Posted by: Tom on Oct 5, 2007 at 03:01 PM
Yeah maybe the final cost will be substantially more than initially figured....only because people like you won't quit bickering and it will take forever to be built!!! It’s going to be built so get over it or move. When the CWS leaves how are we going to subsidize the millions of dollars in revenue the city has counted on for 57 years? I say to all the naysayers that they can take their own trash to the dump and scoop there own streets if this stadium doesn't go though. Build the stadium and I may even go watch a Royals GAME!! HOW ABOUT THAT!!

Posted by: Eric on Oct 5, 2007 at 02:56 PM
Posted by: Elizabeth Location: Omaha ......do you know how stupid that sounds? Yeah tons of money lost because that area of the city is just bustling with economic activity...lol rigghht. As for everyone else, should we drop everything we are doing and the progress of the city because a small group of thugs wont stop shooting each other? There are few innocent victims. They are drug deals gone bad and people retaliating from earlier violence. Nobody has enough money too fix that sort of a problem. All you cheapskates should move to C.B. we don't need your small minds and negativity here anyway.

Posted by: Mike on Oct 5, 2007 at 02:54 PM
The NCAA won't tell you they are leaving until they have already signed a new contract...act now and ensure it's future in Omaha. Or redue Rosenblatt and build the new stadium in 5 more years. Which one makes financial sense to you?

Posted by: pat on Oct 5, 2007 at 02:46 PM
reply to Richard in Minneapolis-there are many very wealthy individuals and businesses in Omaha who have the resources here to make this ciy "on par" with others, the problem is the average citizen paying high taxes cannot afford to keep footing the bill. If businesses here would spread their wealth proportionally with better wages, paying their fair share in taxes, and financial support for these projects, people wouldn't feel so taken advantage of and they would get behind civil projects. The wealthy and big business in Omaha will have to lead the way with "getting smarter" as they've gouged the average wage earner to the point they can't listen to them anymore. 2% may not seem like much, but on top of all the other taxes and wasteful spending, I think most people are just saying enough is enough.

Posted by: Anonymous on Oct 5, 2007 at 02:37 PM
Show Fahey how you feel this weekend. Don't buy or spend anything this weekend that he proposes to tax.

Posted by: Nancy on Oct 5, 2007 at 02:33 PM
My family came to Omaha over the summer and one of our days was spent at the zoo and that afternoon we went to see a ballgame. The stadium was pretty much empty. I don't know how your mayor could justify $120 million dollars for an empty baseball stadium. Plus we stayed at a hotel in downtown and it was a bit scary after dark. The Old Market was beautiful but a few blocks off the beaten path seemed a bit sketchy to me. I think your mayor should spend that money on extra police officers to get your city's crime under control. For the week we were there, the news reported shootings everyday and they were very close to downtown. As nice as the people were in your city of Omaha, my family will not be returning anytime soon. Just an outsiders opinion.

Posted by: DJH on Oct 5, 2007 at 02:31 PM
At this point, I'd vote fot ernie chambers for mayor just to get rid of fahey!!! at leat ernie is a do nothing politian.

Posted by: Dan on Oct 5, 2007 at 02:25 PM
The CWS has never said that they will leave if we don't build a new stadium. Why are we considering a $120M stadium? The mayor and the city council are elceted to carry out the will of the people, not to treat us like children who can't decide for ourselves what we want or need.

Posted by: T on Oct 5, 2007 at 02:13 PM
Steve Haas is right. Does anyone realize the wheel tax was voted in and was suppose to be for only a yr? Hummm, I think it was in the 70's the tax was imposed!

Posted by: bgm on Oct 5, 2007 at 02:09 PM
Our government can continue to raise our taxes but my income doesn't go up. How do they expect anyone to make a living here except the ones that continue to spend my hard earned money on things that I can't even afford to go to. Never have been to CWS and I'm sure not now!!! Thanks Mr. Mayor and Council for your support!!!

Posted by: Scott on Oct 5, 2007 at 02:04 PM
I suppose this the only way Mayor Fahey will get his name on anything once he leaves office. Like another person eluded to, he'll probably take it upon himself to name the stadium the Michael G. Fahey Stadium. The entertainment tax proposal is a bad idea seeing that it will deter some (should be all) locals from wanting to dine out, etc. If you want it to be fair, charge more taxes on hotel stays where you can collect from out-of-towners. This should encourage the City and MECA to go after more serious convention business to fill up the rooms on a more regular basis and make better use of the underutilized Qwest. In short, take the burden off of the people who won't use/visit the facilities. Also, it sounds like the O-Royals aren't actually contributing anything at this point. Lastly, I had Carol Ebdon (Omaha's CFO) as a pofessor in public budgeting. I'm surprised she has allowed herself to become such a pawn in this administration. The numbers just do not work, Carol!

Posted by: Vision on Oct 5, 2007 at 01:55 PM
Everyone wants the CWS to stay, but no one wants to pay for it. Open your eyes if this went to a public vote and you say no to it, who do you blame when the CWS leaves? I know none of you would blame yourselves. How many of you were against the Qwest Center? If this city wants to be a "big time" city then it needs to step up and that is what the mayor is doing. Not to mention the 36 million a year the CWS brings to the economy.

Posted by: Mary on Oct 5, 2007 at 01:52 PM
I vote NO, and a recall is in order. The problem with $120 million is that, when all is said and done, it will be $150-$200 million! Rosenblatt is a great, nostalgic field which teams want to come to. A new field on an asphalt jungle looking at a bridge to no where is not my idea of fiscal management.

Posted by: w on Oct 5, 2007 at 01:50 PM
So taxes go up and people buy less and the city makes less in tax revenue so the city charges more in tax and people buy less and the city gets less revenue. Then people leave cause the taxes are too high and the city has to charge more in taxes to make up for what they are losing. Where will the city get the money for the stadium if people aren't buying enough to make the 200 million needed.

Posted by: Art on Oct 5, 2007 at 01:47 PM
When the people boycott the Omaha restaurant for restaurants outside Omaha not victim to the new mayor's tax, will the city reimburse for the lost income?

Posted by: rl on Oct 5, 2007 at 01:45 PM
any politicians remember a little part of history that dealt with a certain tea party resulting from taxation without representation....and another of "government for the people by the people"?

Posted by: Chris on Oct 5, 2007 at 01:45 PM
So lets go over to Council Bluffs to eat from now on !!!!

Posted by: GP on Oct 5, 2007 at 01:42 PM
I will be dining in Council Bluffs right after I fill my car with cheaper gas.

Posted by: Pat on Oct 5, 2007 at 01:40 PM
This will most likely will be the worst thing to happen to this city, since the footbridge and maybe the Q-West. Fahey is out of control. Enough is enough. So now what? I'm sure most of the people in this city could care less about a new ball park. We are paying for to many mistakes now. I've never been to the College World Series or the Q-West, and I've lived here all my 60 years of life. Plus I'm still waiting for my share of all the money, these things bring into the city. With all the negative things I've read apposing this, I still haven't heard of anyone with away or idea of stopping this, before it's to late. I'm just a small time retired person being taxed to death. There's got to be people out there with ideas and the smarts to do something about this, and take control of our city back. I'm not the smartest one around, but would be glad to help some smart leaders stop this. Please someone try to stop this now and save the people of Omaha, before it's to late.

Posted by: Ann on Oct 5, 2007 at 01:31 PM
One person, one vote. No taxation without (decent) representation! Where have I heard that before? Take Fahey and his lackeys out of office. If I can't vote against it, how am I represented? The only reason the mayor (aka money-monger) doesn't want a vote is because then he won't get his own way. Is our government a bunch of out-of-control toddlers? We need a BIG change!!!! We need it now! Next he'll tax medical care as entertainment.... Single parents can hardly afford to feed their families working one or two jobs, and now we cannot even enjoy the "luxury" of an occasional meal from a deli or a restaurant!!!!!! Where is the recall petition? I want to be first to sign it! My city councilman had better find a day job.

Posted by: Thinking on Oct 5, 2007 at 01:29 PM
Math, w/ Calculator - 1: $40 mil x 20 years = $800 mil. 2: $120 mil divided by 20 years = $6 mil / year 3: $6 mil is .0075 of $800 mil 4: An extra .027 / $1.00 on a $65 meal out - $1.75 Question---Which or do all of these numbers make this decision smart? Puleeez..........

Posted by: Linda on Oct 5, 2007 at 01:24 PM
I'm ready for a recall!!!

Posted by: John on Oct 5, 2007 at 01:23 PM
Once again the Politician strikes again. When is Mr. Fahey going to learn that he needs to listen to the people and quit pushing his agenda down their throats.

Posted by: Millie on Oct 5, 2007 at 01:22 PM
Instead of the mayor and council worrying about keeping CWS, he shoul worry about keeping the people. If not for the immigrants, the population in Nebraska has been going down.

Posted by: Chris on Oct 5, 2007 at 01:02 PM
What a bunch of know it alls. Say bye bye to the CWS then. Nobody is ever happy around here. Complain but don't come up with any type of solution. Just like everything else that's wrong in this society.

Posted by: John on Oct 5, 2007 at 12:58 PM
I think the Mayor should put up the first 5 million and have all his close buddies, like Dennis Circo contribute. Why would anyone agree to this plan since the tickets will still be hard to get!

Posted by: alan on Oct 5, 2007 at 12:58 PM
These are the sorts of ideas and decisions that made moving away 6 years ago an easy one.

Posted by: Chris on Oct 5, 2007 at 12:56 PM
Should have legalized gambling in Ne. That could pay for this. Instead, all the tax revenue goes to Iowa and we still have the problems of gambling without any benefits of it. Just a thought.

Posted by: carey on Oct 5, 2007 at 12:44 PM
how many seats in the new stadium? I thought I heard the same that rosenblatt now holds (let me guess room for expansion). so besides more tax plus the ncaa controling the grounds around the stadium ie (no alcohol) what the heck are we gaining?

Posted by: Anonymous on Oct 5, 2007 at 12:27 PM
recall fahey. what a dum idea

Posted by: J on Oct 5, 2007 at 12:23 PM
I find it interesting that the mayor is trying to run this thru before we get hit with the cost of the sewer separation. Has anyone stopped to think of the fact that by Federal Mandate we have to have this done. It's not the government paying for it. Our MUD bill is going to sky rocket untill the billions of dollars that this will cost is payed. When the bill is doubled or tripled not namy of the real people of Omaha will be able to go eat or to a movie.

Posted by: David on Oct 5, 2007 at 12:20 PM
We must recall the Mayor period. He is out of control.

Posted by: Sandy on Oct 5, 2007 at 12:16 PM
Fahey why isn't this something the public can vote on? I know why because you know darn good and well it wouldn't go through!!! We are the ones that go to the games so we should have a say. I have never seen anyone spend money (THAT WE DON'T HAVE) like this city does, UNBELIEVEABLE.We don't need a new stadium. This would be great if we had the extra money but when I see all these other things that the money could be spent on, no way. I attend many of the CWS games and there's nothing wrong with Rosenblatt. We have homeless people with nowhere to go and schools that need fixing trust me my kids attend a school that is in need of some major repair not to mention that our teachers are paid crap. This just sickens me!!!

Posted by: Jim on Oct 5, 2007 at 12:15 PM
I am sick and tire of being taxed to death. 2% for twenty years so other can go to games that I could never get tickets for. thats NUTS. Raise the price of tickets 5.00. $5.00 x 20000 tickets, x 10 games a series is $1mm a year supported by the USERS.

Posted by: Linda Davey on Oct 5, 2007 at 12:14 PM
Why isn't he listening to the people? When did we indicate we wanted a dictator? Roosenblatt is a tradition I am not willing to give up. This is an event my family looks forward to every year. Not only Roosenblatt, but the entire atmosphere surrounding it. I personally will not frequent any entertainment facility in Omaha and pay an addition 2% tax for food or drinks. Ralston, Council Bluffs, Millard all are close enough to avoid the Omaha area for entertainment. I say get the heck out of Dodge Fahey.

Posted by: michael on Oct 5, 2007 at 12:11 PM
once again our weak minded politicians are not listening to the public. We don't want the new stadium its obvious. But do we get a voice in this, nope. We put these people in their jobs to represent us, I guess that just dosen't matter anymore. A very sad statement about our mayor again. All I can say is I'm glad I didn't vote for that idiot. What a waste of humanity. He is a bum and all he cares about is himself. To say publicly that he dosen't wan to get let the public vote on this is just plain stupid. What an idiot!!!

Posted by: Jillian on Oct 5, 2007 at 12:10 PM
I moved from Omaha because of the arrogance of the politicians and school board. The park has been a done deal for a LONG TIME!! Would love to know who's getting the payoff/paybacks by locating it downtown. Time for a Boston Tea Party!

Posted by: Chris on Oct 5, 2007 at 12:05 PM
Chuck Siegerson, suposedly a republican, says its a choice of the tax or lose the cws. People of Omaha, Mike Fahey and company are right. A change is needed. At the next election I propose a 100% turnover rate in elected officials seeking re election. The people still ultimately have the power----at the ballot box.

Posted by: Liz on Oct 5, 2007 at 12:04 PM
Let's take back our city from the NCAA. Write to them at 700 W. Washington St., P.O. Box 6222, Indianapolis, IN 46206-6222 and tell them that if they don't like Rosenblatt, they can take their ball games to another city.

Posted by: Richard on Oct 5, 2007 at 11:59 AM
Want to know why there is a brain drain in Omaha? I'll give you a hint...NOT TAXES. It's the close-minded, myopic, backwards thinking by the majority of the citizens. You people whine and complain about EVERYTHING. Are you people seriously complaining about $.2 on a bottle of Coke? This is exactly why Omaha will never be able to compete with the big boys...Omaha's citizens are it's worst enemy. I am thankful that a few enlightened individuals like Hal Daub had VISION and has transformed the appearance and view of Omaha. Mayor Fahey is just continuing that trend. For a state that prides itself on education, you certainly wouldn't know it by reading the comments on here. Economics 101, folks. Don't worry, I am sure Indianapolis will treat the CWS like their own. I will be interested in seeing the fallout after that occurs too. You go Omaha...WHINE, COMPLAIN, WHINE.

Posted by: M on Oct 5, 2007 at 11:56 AM
Fahey, get your head out of your you know what and take a look around!!! Construction, construction, construction!! Lets take our money and finish THEM before we start something else. You make me and a lot of other Omahans upset because all you are thinking about is yourself!

Posted by: Elizabeth on Oct 5, 2007 at 11:56 AM
CWS probably costs us as much as it brings in. Lots of businesses lose money during the ball games because the horrible traffic situation makes them inaccessible. I know of several businesses in the Rosenblatt area that are in that boat. Add the cost of extra police, staff, and the vandalism and CWS is not such a great deal. It's time for them to go elsewhere.

Posted by: Nick walker on Oct 5, 2007 at 11:54 AM
I think that the Mayor should take responsibility for ths city and all of the wrong and hurt that is happening here. Kids die every night the homless are going to start getting cod and needing a place to sleep that is harder and harder to find , and the mayor is more concerned with taxing its citizens and wasting money on a bridge to nowhere council bluffs, and putting a Brand spanking new stadium downtown after spending millions to renovate rosenblatt recent years. lets get our priorities in line and take care of our own before worrying about keeping CWS here. so the city tells us we make 40 million a year, who is going to tell us how much we have spent each year to keep the cws here?

Posted by: Tired of it on Oct 5, 2007 at 11:53 AM
Whom does Fahey represent! Not those who reside in this city. If he did, he would not mind if we voted on a tax increase!

Posted by: Tom on Oct 5, 2007 at 11:50 AM
Don't get so upset with Mayor Fahey''s new plan! He just throwing his weight around. Did he forget, he was elected, as is any elected offical, to represent the people who elected him and put him in his position. When ever anything of importance comes up, it should simply be put to a vote by the public, NOT THE MAYOR! After all he is nothing more than a mayor, not a DICTATOR! If this stadium and tax increase were to be voted on by the public it would fail by a landslide. We have not ever heard a word from the College world series offical's stating their views on Rosenblatt or relocating to a new stadium down town. Chuck Siegersen is the only councilman who had the nerve to stand up and voice any opposition to the mayors new proposal! Way to go CHUCK!

Posted by: Jean on Oct 5, 2007 at 11:50 AM
I wish I had a pool of never ending people to tax every time I want something new. GET REAL! We can't take anymore. Our paychecks are already taxed to the hilt.

Posted by: Louie on Oct 5, 2007 at 11:42 AM
The price keeps going up on this stadium. This whole thing should be left up to the voters,taxpayers to decide on. There is nothing wrong with our present stadium with all the updates and renovations that have been done recently. This was done to keep the interest of the N.C.A.A and C.W.S. officials in keeping it Omaha. Now there has to be a new stadium built to keep these organizations happy. There is a new tax on prepared food that will help pay for this new facility. That is the answer,a new tax in Nebraska for something else we really do not need,another white elephant. Our city leaders should be concerned with other things that Omaha needs,and not trying to fix things that are not broke.

Posted by: Lynda on Oct 5, 2007 at 11:42 AM
I can't wait to vote for a new mayor!

Posted by: Bev on Oct 5, 2007 at 11:40 AM
Recall Mayor Fahey. All he does is tax us more. The citizens of Omaha can not afford more taxes. Everytime they add taxes it is more taxes for our Grand Children will have to continue to pay. (Example is the Wheel Tax that was added when I was a child and now I am retired) When we do NOT need a new stadium. We pay higher taxes than most bigger cities.

Posted by: Ted on Oct 5, 2007 at 11:40 AM
I have to agree that it is time for new leadership in Omaha. The combined sewer system is going to cost Omaha tax payes hundreds of millions - our Mayor has no suggestions to date for its payment. The mayor's proposed rapid transit solution for downtown will cost us more millions. Omaha has problems paying for adequate police and firefighters, let alone street repair and expansions to meet our growing city. The mayor has not clearly explained why he believes Rosenblatt cannot be remodeled/repaired to accommodate a possible - that is POSSIBLE - contract with the CWS. Planning to build an ill-conceived new stadium with inadequate parking is ridiculous. The mayor and councilmen who support a new stadium need to start looking for new jobs.

Posted by: Vernon Davis on Oct 5, 2007 at 11:39 AM
If you don't like the new stadium, I expect to see Rosenblatt sold out for every game. Omaha does not support the sports team, the land that JRS sits on can be better used. IE expanding the Henry Dorley into a more acclaimed world class zoo. Otherwise enjoy the new 2% entertainment tax. GO Omaha sports teams!!

Posted by: Ellie on Oct 5, 2007 at 11:37 AM
I already go to Iowa to fill my car up because it's cheaper. Looks like I will be heading over there for entertainment as well. I love downtown Omaha and it gets crazy down there during the World Series as it is. To add a stadium closer to downtown would be a mess! We do not need a new stadium, we have a perfectly good one that only gets used once a year.

Posted by: Doug on Oct 5, 2007 at 11:36 AM
Let's see he's planning on building a new stadium with the exact number of seats of our current stadium. What kind of logic is that, all the goverment wants to do is spend spend spend, and who pays for it US. I am sick and tired of all the politicians they are ruining this country. They don't have the peoples best interest at heart. All they care about is fighing amongst themselves and using there power to make themselves richer. NO NEW STADIUM

Posted by: Bob on Oct 5, 2007 at 11:33 AM
How about reducing the city budget by 2%? I can't believe the mayor and council are considering burdening the citizens of Omaha even more that they already are burdened! Neb is already approaching the top ten in the nation for taxation of it's citizens. How many days a year will this facility sit idle? All of this for one brief CWS event? Is it worth it? I dont think so and my vote will reflect that next election day! another overtaxed West Omahan

Posted by: Pat on Oct 5, 2007 at 11:30 AM
I have been visiting family in Omaha for 10 years and living here for 4. I can only get CWS tickets at high prices through Ticket Master. Why should I subsidize with my fixed income the pursuits of the few. Put the tax on the motels etc. that will really benefit. The NCAA needs to make all seats available through a lottery system like the Women's Final Four Basketball rather than allowing a few to hoard tickets and pass them around or sell them like family possessions.

Posted by: Casey on Oct 5, 2007 at 11:28 AM
Fahey is the best Mayor this city has ever seen. He is doing what needs to be done to keep the CWS IN OMAHA!!! It is the biggest event that brings in the most money for the town. If you CHEAPSKATES don't pony up for what NEEDS to be done then go ahead and move. FAHEY is SAVING this city from itself. Let's get progressive here people. This is not Des Moines. I'll pay whatever Tax they want to keep that CWS here. or should we just have Oklahoma City take the CWS and the 10's of Millions of bucks it brings to this city. Quit complaining and open up the wallets or MOVE... Council Bluffs is just across the river.

Posted by: Colette on Oct 5, 2007 at 11:26 AM
This is exactly why my family decided to move to Iowa. I have to say if this tax passes, I will be spending a majority of my entertainment dollars in my own state to avoid the tax.

Posted by: Anonymous on Oct 5, 2007 at 11:23 AM
Is it really necessary to have another stadium when Rosenblatt is perfectly fine.

Posted by: michael on Oct 5, 2007 at 11:15 AM
We all know this is one of the most taxed cities in the USA. It bad enuf I have to pay for the retirement of pubilc servants, whose retirement income is higher than I will ever EARN. Who negotiated that contract for the citizens of Omaha? Now they want us to come up with the money to fund a ball park that I may go to once a year. Maybe they should look at where they are spending the taxpayers hard earned money and budget it a little better. They have the cash, they need to learn how to spend it responsibly.

Posted by: Leslie on Oct 5, 2007 at 11:12 AM
How long are the people of Omaha going to allow themselves to be taxed to death? Good God, we already have a excessive wheel tax and outrageous property taxes. NOW I have to be taxed for an a baseball stadium we don't need???? Oh it will be great for Omaha. More people will visit! It will be a lonely visit because no one else can afford to live here any more. Impeach that schmuck Mayor and his cronies.

Posted by: c on Oct 5, 2007 at 11:08 AM
If we can spend this kind of money for a new unecessary stadium, why can't we put money into north Omaha to help stop the crime. If we can't afford more police officers, how can we afford a new stadium? Where is our Mayor's priorities?

Posted by: Jill on Oct 5, 2007 at 11:02 AM
Douglas County Residents move to Sarpy County! We have great schools, a new mall, restuartants and a Wonderful Law Enforcement Department. If I need to go to the Mall I will go over to Mall of the Bluffs. I will not spend any money in Douglas County!

Posted by: Todd on Oct 5, 2007 at 10:51 AM
Hal Daub is remembered for the Mayor who made the Qwest Center (and surrounding area) happen. Fahey wants to blow Omaha's budget to try to get a legacy of his own by getting a new ballpark by the Qwest Center. Fahey is a hindrance to the progress and safety of Omaha! Thank God I live in Blair where he can't tax me yet!

Posted by: MJ on Oct 5, 2007 at 10:50 AM
listening to Fahey right now, can't even say that a twenty year contract will happen for sure. This is his dream, it is not in stone. Now he wants to be a "sell" his idea to omahans via town halls and etc. give me a break. We need to RECALL him now before he spends anymore of our money. He is a BIG BULLY who will stop at nothing to get what HE wants.

Posted by: Proud citizen? on Oct 5, 2007 at 10:49 AM
Over 220 commments on this issue, most opposed. I thought that was why it's so great to live in the USA...the people are supposed to have a voice. What is wrong with this city? A new stadium is completely unnecessary when the crime rate is at an all time high, homeless shelters are being shut down because there is no funding...we have so many problems! A new stadium and promise to have the CWS for 20 years will not fix that, in fact, it will probably make things worse.

Posted by: Pat on Oct 5, 2007 at 10:42 AM
Reply to Smart: We are already paying more taxes on everything than is necessary for all the services the city should provide, without CWS money. You realize that we are paying some of the highest taxes anywhere. The problem is mismanagement of our tax money. Do you think any of the other taxes will be lowered or elminated because of this ballpark? No way. This is an idea generated by business, so let businesses pay more taxes and donate the money. The mayor can help them get them some tax incentives and free CWS tickets with free parking and the best seats, which they'll get anyway even if they tax the people for it. People against this are not "backwards", we know if the city was managing its funds properly there would not have to be any tax to support this kind of project.

Posted by: Rusty S. on Oct 5, 2007 at 10:40 AM
I’m playing my violin for all of you. I think the mayor is much more qualified to fun the cities finances than any of you. Raise your hand if you’re a multi-millionaire! That’s what I thought. Fahey would have had a hand up because he understands business and finance. Stop acting like you're experts.

Posted by: Carol on Oct 5, 2007 at 10:36 AM
We moved to Papillion years ago to get out of Douglas county and always changing tax situation! We hardly ever spend our money in Omaha. I feel sorry for the tax payers in Douglas county. MOVE

Posted by: joe on Oct 5, 2007 at 10:34 AM
how much does fahey have in invested in the motels around that area ? i say no vote no arena!

Posted by: Bill on Oct 5, 2007 at 10:32 AM
There is an impeachment process in Nebraska. Contact your state Senator and see what it will take to start the process. If enough make complaints, it might work.

Posted by: Jennifer on Oct 5, 2007 at 10:25 AM
I want to move. Not that the "mayor" cares, but I just really want to move. Sad. Really sad. I feel sick just thinking about it. Construction everywhere, people getting shot, going hungry, not a quiet spot left in town. Now I'm supposed to be taxed more so more problems can be created, and less fixed? Seriously, what must outsiders think of us? I will pray for resolution. Who's with me?

Posted by: Jay on Oct 5, 2007 at 10:19 AM
If we don't agree with the tax increase, then lets vote for a new mayor and a new city council! We can complain all we want, and they don't care, let"s vote them out!

Posted by: BS on Oct 5, 2007 at 10:15 AM
With health costs rising so quickly, not to mention all the taxes I have moved from the so-called middle class, to the working class poor. I can't get any of the help that others seem to receive, but I can not afford to eat out, see movies, to have a needed surgery, vacation -- except maybe a drive to a local park to watch the squirrels or anything else. I do not have cable, a cell phone or any other extras -- yet Fahey wants more. I hope there is still room over in Iowa. I'm seriously considering to move come Jan. 1. Nebraska is now too expensive to live. I think it is stupid to pay that kind of money for a stadium to be used for two weeks. The Royals also do not think that they will "buy" into that cost. So why should we. Fahey and council -- you will be replaced soon!

Posted by: tam on Oct 5, 2007 at 10:14 AM
Let those who like baseball pay the tax if they want to see it built, there are plenty of people who could care less if The World Series stays here at all.

Posted by: me on Oct 5, 2007 at 10:14 AM
I love the idea of a new stadium. Rosenblatt served its purpose and needs to GO AWAY! For those who are against the new stadium what happens if the CWS leaves after 2010? Are you willing to put your money where your mouth is and make up for the 35 Million the CWS brings in? Because if we do lose it, we have to make up for it and guess what... you will BE TAXED... and I would love to hear your crying than..... so embrace the change...

Posted by: Anonymous on Oct 5, 2007 at 10:11 AM
I think it is ridiculous that Mr Fahey wants to build a new stadium. For what? What is wrong with Rosenblatt? Thats what I thought, nothing. Lets make the people of Omaha pay more taxes when half of us wont even visit the new stadium. That makes a lot of sense. It looks like everyone is against this so why build a new stadium?

Posted by: d on Oct 5, 2007 at 10:06 AM
So how do we go about recalling the mayor?

Posted by: Ron on Oct 5, 2007 at 09:58 AM
Extremely high crime rate; bridges to nowhere and a $100 million dollar stadium we don't need. Fahey and Warren need to be recalled.

Posted by: Mike on Oct 5, 2007 at 09:53 AM
Keep our present ball stadium. A new one is not needed nor an essential. A new stadium will be a huge tax burden like the Quest Center. Omaha residents all ready have too many expensive items to pay for now and in the future. Lets work on the problems that affect all of us.

Posted by: Barney on Oct 5, 2007 at 09:46 AM
Great!!! More taxes!!!

Posted by: Barbara on Oct 5, 2007 at 09:31 AM
The new ball park that our mayor wants is a moot point as anytime the mayor wants to spend a lot of money the citizens do not get to vote on it. He has said he does not want any public vote. The walking bridge for one example . Everything in Omaha is already so heavily taxed that many are leaving this state . There are many elderly people who did not make the big bucks and could not put away money for retirement. Menial and service jobs do not offer 401 programs and If it were not for Franklin Roosevelt we would not have Social Security . You can not live on even that and ever since the people in charge have been borrowing from it , it is now in jeopardy and that is being blamed on the baby boomers . Wake up Omaha , start thinking of your citizens who would love to go to shows , eat out , etc but can not afford to do so and now it would be really impossible. Everything in this town is way over taxed already.

Posted by: JC on Oct 5, 2007 at 09:29 AM
I'm all but ready to move to Iowa. We can build stupid bridges and spend millions to fix something that's not broken - yet the City stands by as homeless shelters close and are at the mercy of personal contributions to help see that those who are forced to live on the streets don't starve to death. GET YOUR PRIORITIES STRAIGHT!!!

Posted by: To: JIM DUNDEE on Oct 5, 2007 at 09:08 AM
To Jim: Yeah you have a lot to say about an extra dollar or two. Number one I work for the State and make very little money to support my son and I on. You live in Dundee, ritzy-ritzy neighborhood. If you can afford the extra dollar or two then why dont you donate some money and leave us poor people alone. By the way I am lucky to afford a $66.00 dinner every two years. We go to Taco Bell to save money. Think about the community as a whole!!!!

Posted by: taxed out on Oct 5, 2007 at 09:06 AM
Isn't it time for this idiot to go??? He reminds me of bush's twin brother..just tax the heck out of people..

Posted by: Jean on Oct 5, 2007 at 09:04 AM
Citizens of Omaha, can you spell R-E-C-A-L-L? Mr. Fahey and his big money backers are killing our city!!!! Business owners in C.B, Ralston, Bellevue and Papillion: GEAR UP! I can get my dinner from you and not pay for a stupid stadium. Most of us can hardly ever afford to have "prepared food" as it is, so now we will be taking our business out of town, so to speak, to avoid paying a 2% entertainment tax. Working parents find prepared food sometimes necessary, not entertaining, if they are to enjoy a meal after a 10-hour work day spent earning enough to pay the taxes already imposed on us. SERVERS: As the tax goes up, watch your tips go down. You can only sopend a dollar once! Well-being of the citizens of Omaha vs. keeping the CWS, so the big guys make even more....hmmmmm. Most of us won't be able to afford a ticket to the new digs anyway.

Posted by: L on Oct 5, 2007 at 08:48 AM
Once again, we sure can plan to find the cash for sports stuff, and when asked the coffers are empty for streets, sewers and education! There are many more important things than new base ball stadiums!

Posted by: 9% SalesTax on Oct 5, 2007 at 08:37 AM
Basically what the Mayor is trying to feed us is a 9% Sales Tax on just about everything. So after we pay the 9% Sales Tax at our favorite restaurant and theatre, we drive home in our car taxed to the hilt with property taxes, wheel taxes and fees to our home that has higher property taxes than most states to talk on our phone, watch tv and use internet which is taxed to the hilt by the city. I bet Mayor Fahey and the Council are trying to figure out how to tax breathing right now. It is the only thing not taxed, unless you need an inhaler or oxygen tank.

Posted by: c on Oct 5, 2007 at 08:36 AM
All I can say is RECALL the mayor!!!

Posted by: Jake on Oct 5, 2007 at 08:35 AM
Brenda, great info but please tell us, how do we get a recall of this mayor started? I know many people who are eager to remove this guy..... the sooner the better

Posted by: Bill on Oct 5, 2007 at 08:25 AM
Let's get a "Recall Fahey" movement started - after we force a public vote on a new stadium and it gets shot down. The Mayor and his cronies are not being very open to us - THE TAXPAYERS!

Posted by: Smart on Oct 5, 2007 at 08:23 AM
Don't you people get it? The CWS brings $40 million in Omaha each year. If the CWS leaves, how are we going to pay for the services the $40 million went to? Taxes! So either take a 2% tax on luxury items people do not have to have, or pay a higher property tax so your snow is shoveled. Think about it people and don't be so backwards.

Posted by: Pat on Oct 5, 2007 at 08:21 AM
No vote? Well, ok, I will "vote" to not to patronize the new ballpark or any of its vendors, just as I've never attended any event at the Quest other than a graduation. I will "vote" to stop eating at Omaha restaurants (our family of 4 eats out 4-5 times a week), and I'll stop buying locally whenever I can find things on the internet for less. See, I just "voted" myself a tax decrease. Really, I think our collective "pocketbook" votes will as much to change things than a ballot right now. What's going on with this city anyway, trying to cut public safety jobs and neglecting the sewers and then blowing money away left and right on a pedestrian bridge, decorated manhole covers, and now this ballpark scam, whoops, I meant scheme. This mayor and many of the city council are so out of touch with people here, and obviously are self-serving. In my opinion we need a change of leadership immediately before more financial damage is done.

Posted by: JG on Oct 5, 2007 at 08:21 AM
Are you kidding me? Our children are gunned down almost daily in an ever widening area of town. We have the largest urban concentration of black poor in the country. We have a dysfunctional sewer system that must be replaced. Our shelters are often at or over capacity with homeless. Traffic and road repair is worse than ever. Our taxpayers are already bled to the tune of #4 tax rate in the nation and how does our Mayor respond? Build a footbridge purely for aesthetic reasons. Build a new stadium because the current one is well, it's old and run down. Omaha's Mayor is far more concerned with image than substance. If that was confined to his own household it would be his problem. Trying to ram this down our throat, without a vote, makes it our problem. You picked the wrong place and time to sneak one in without a vote Mayor Fahey. This will get you recalled. We have had enough.

Posted by: Tracy on Oct 5, 2007 at 08:20 AM
Not only are we the tax me state, but also the tax me city. No wonder people are moving out of the city limits, let alone the state. I woudln't be opposed to the new stadium if the revenue coming in from the CWS (34 million) actually went back into the community. Does the community see this money? NO, businesses do. Businesses that I don't use in this city. Hotels, certain restaurants, etc. How about using the money to help reconstruct our parks, repair streets, help the homeless. But no, Omaha is money greedy. Casinos in Iowa actually give money back to their community. Plus, how many regional citizens actually go to the CWS games? I've been to 3 games in my 28 years of life. If the city is going to tax me once again, use it for something that I'm actually going to benefit from.

Posted by: kaylee on Oct 5, 2007 at 08:14 AM
I think we need to keep the stadium because it gives so sort of heart to omaha and its been here for a long time and we do not want to ruen that reputaion we have for it

Posted by: Jay on Oct 5, 2007 at 08:05 AM
Whenever a politician doesn't want a vote on something important, it means the will of the people is about to be subverted and most likely your pocketbook is about to get lifted. If replacing the existing stadium with a new smaller stadium for $116M was a good idea, Mayor Fahey wouldn't cower behind the council. We would have a vote. Implementing multiple new taxes without representation was enough to start a war in this country two centuries ago. I for one would rally behind a recall effort for Mayor Fahey or any councilman that aligns with him to pervert and obstruct the will of the people. When will politicians realize they are elected to support us?

Posted by: Law on Oct 5, 2007 at 08:04 AM
I suggest the Nebraska State Attorney General investigate Mayor Fahey's office and the 11 of 12 City Council who are behind this. What is there motive and potential gain from another expensive project the city can not afford? What was behind their getting us an unreal police contract, manhole covers, redoing new medians near the crossroads, footbridge, and on and on. There is something driving these people and the State's Attorney General needs to do an Elliot Spitzer and investigate.

Posted by: Steve Haas on Oct 5, 2007 at 07:54 AM
Let the public who would have to pay for the new stadium vote on it. And what are the chances that the entertainment tax, if enacted, would come off the books when the stadium is paid off? ZERO!!!!

Posted by: Karin on Oct 5, 2007 at 07:45 AM
I believe in Democracy! We need to have a vote on this one!

Posted by: MIKE CHAPMAN on Oct 5, 2007 at 07:25 AM
THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH ROSENBLADT, EVERY YEAR THE CITY SHOVELS MONEY TO UPDATE AND KEEP THE NCAA HAPPY. I THINK IT IS TIME FOR THE CITY OF OMAHA TO PUT THEIR BIG BOY PANTS ON AND STAND UP TO THE NCAA. TAXING THE GOOD PEOPLE OF OMAHA TO FUND A NEW FACILITY WHEN WE CAN'T UTILIZE THE ONE WE HAVE TO ITS FULL POTENTIAL... THIS IS NOT THE WAY TO DO THINGS. IT THE MAYOR IS SO TAX HAPPY, LET HIM USE THE 2% TAX TO TAKE CARE OF THE VILANCE IN THE CITY. THIS MAKES MUCH MORE SENSE. I THINK IF THIS COMES TO A VOTE OF THE PEOPLE, THE MAYOR IS GOING TO BE SADLY DISAPPOINTED.

Posted by: me on Oct 5, 2007 at 07:18 AM
Absolutely ridiculous! We have rampant, violent crime almost daily here. We also have a huge sewer bill coming up and we still don't know how that's going to be paid. Fahey along with his cronies need to be REMOVED FROM OFFICE before he spends the rest of my paycheck. Can't we do something to stop this? Doesn't the College World Series have to pay something to Omaha for having it here? Let them pay for it, because I don't feel I should have to. Omaha Management = Dictatorship.

Posted by: Kevin on Oct 5, 2007 at 07:13 AM
New taxes ? Hot ziggedy ! I'm starting to think Mayor Fahey owns some land or a restaurant in this proposed area . Or maybe some of his friends. A 120 million dollar stadium for a two week event ? Get real it's time we say NO . If the NCCA doesn't want to stay then buh bye and thanks for the memories.

Posted by: Steve on Oct 5, 2007 at 07:09 AM
Just keep it up Mike, you will continue to drive people like myself out of Omaha. You will continue to erode your tax base... and you don't have too many more Elkhorns to annex. I really don't think that the majority of the residents in Omaha are interested in the silly bridge or the new stadium. The fine people of Omaha that I know are sick and tired of being taxed to death. We really don't have to look far to see other options. I for one am happy that I live across the county line and Omaha will not impose its taxation maximization on me and my family! I think you and the City Council need to think about the long term ramifications of what you are doing and keep in mind that elections are coming and you all might be out here looking for work in the private sector. I for one can think of alot of other needs in Omaha, how about feeding the homeless or doing something more about the drug and gang problem. The good people at the Francis House are on TV begging for help! DON'T YOU HEAR!!!!

Posted by: Hmm... on Oct 5, 2007 at 06:58 AM
Why shouldn't there be a tax on entertainment/dining out? We tax cigarettes/alcohol like there is no tomorrow. The problems caused by obesity and inactivity cost us more in health care costs than cancer and liver disease. I am glad to see that the burden is finally starting to be spread out. Besides, The new stadium is used for entertainment, no?

Posted by: Timmeh on Oct 5, 2007 at 06:47 AM
Omaha is one of the highest taxed cities in the country. I moved here from the west coast knowing they were steep for the area, but until I actually started paying them, I didn't realize how bad it was. It seems like I'm being taxed or fee'd for about everything here. Real estate taxes are extremely high, car plates are ridiculously high, income tax, sales tax, wheel tax, and on and on and on. Where does the money go? I hear that every one of them is "For the children". Boy to be a kid here and all this money going to you. What a deal. I'm going back out west. At least there's scenery to look at.

Posted by: Matt on Oct 5, 2007 at 06:35 AM
If they want to build a new stadium then we should not have to pay for it, just because we live in the great city of Omaha we should not have to pay $120 Million.

Posted by: Sean on Oct 5, 2007 at 06:23 AM
I would gladly pay a 2% or even 5% tax if it went towards strengthening our police department, fixing the sewer issue, repairing the sadly crumbling infrastructure of our town. But for a stadium we don't need and most don't want, it's fiscal irresponsibility of the highest level.And to try to force it on the city without a vote is shameful - even for Fahey.

Posted by: Mike on Oct 5, 2007 at 06:09 AM
The reason we the voters can't vote on this issue is because the city leaders don't think it will pass. Well we can vote, there are plenty of nice places to eat and get entertainment outside of Omaha. We will vote with our feet and debit cards. At election time - we need to remember!

Posted by: ENOUGH! on Oct 5, 2007 at 06:08 AM
We have our priorities so terribly misaligned. We do NOT need a new stadium. We NEED tax relief, functioning sewers, road repair, schools, $ to cover the shortfall in the pension fund etc. It just goes on and on. There is a reason our young people leave and never come back. Elderly people cannot afford to retire here. We partically have the days counted until our child graduates and we can leave too Omaha is becoming one of those cities that is "a nice place to visit, but I wouldn't want to live there." ENOUGH!

Posted by: HJA on Oct 5, 2007 at 05:35 AM
Who does the property ( parking lots where new stadium is to be built) belong to NOT THE CITY, Frank Brown and other city folks ? They stand to make alot of money off us. PUT THIS ISSUE TO A VOTE ! What is wrong with our city council, force the vote

Posted by: Herb on Oct 5, 2007 at 05:29 AM
Put the issue to a resident vote.... What happened to the 50 mil, now its 100 mil plus? 26 mil for Rossenblatt looks great. PUT IT TO A VOTE !

Posted by: Jeff on Oct 5, 2007 at 04:19 AM
Great. We need roads and bridges fixed but we getting a stadium instead. Fahey needs to take a vacation and stay there.

Posted by: Dan on Oct 5, 2007 at 02:23 AM
We still have not figured out how to quite pay for the sewer problem.

Posted by: Typical on Oct 5, 2007 at 02:21 AM
What a liar! Fahey said he wasn't going to burden the taxpayers with stadium costs, but of course that was a lie. There must be a big kickback promised by the stadium builder, to make a Mayor do a 180 like that. Next he'll say it's "for the children".

Posted by: Kally on Oct 5, 2007 at 01:41 AM
I don't agree with this new tax that the mayor is proposing. A lot of people I know, myself included, don't watch sports and have no desire to go to Rosenblatt. So why the heck should we have to pay for something we don't care about?

Posted by: bRENDA on Oct 5, 2007 at 01:03 AM
Any Councilmember may be removed at any time from office in the manner provided by state law. The Mayor may be removed by vote of the electors at any regular election or special election called for the purpose. A petition signed by electors shall be filed in the same manner as for removal of Councilmembers except that such petition shall not name a candidate for election to succeed the Mayor and need only be signed by electors equal in number to 20 per cent of the number of ballots cast for the office of Mayor in the election in which the Mayor was elected. The City Council shall fix a date of election not less than thirty days and not more than sixty days from the date of the county clerk's or election commissioner's certificate to the council showing the petition sufficient.

Posted by: People on Oct 5, 2007 at 12:19 AM
People power. I suggest boycotting starting right away every thing that will be taxed. When the retailers of the city feel the pinch, this Fahey nonsense of spend, spend, tax, tax, will end.

Posted by: Aaron on Oct 5, 2007 at 12:08 AM
Feel free to tax me more Fahey. I really appreciate it. Between Ernie trying to sue God, the School System battle, the Elkhorn annexation and now Rosenblatt, I think I'm ready to move out of here for the better life (cheaper too).

Posted by: Ali on Oct 5, 2007 at 12:04 AM
I am selling my house and leaving Omaha. Everyday I have second thoughts because this is my home, but then everyday I get a message from the ciy in the way of higher taxes telling me that although I like the people here, the city government has taxed me out of here.

Posted by: John on Oct 4, 2007 at 11:49 PM
First 30 - 40 million. The zoo was going to buy and pay for the land at Rosenblatt. Now 120 million and the zoo says in the newspaper it does not want the land. By the time it will be done, it will be 240 million. I remember when someone said we needed a war in Iraq. One trillion dollars later, a quaqmire, 4000 soldiers dead and 30,000 wounded and maimed and no end in sight. Time to say no to Fahey and the 11 out of 12 on the city council who want to feed us this for who knows what gain they get. If they don't listen now, we can make them listen election day. Omaha threw out the entire city council before. We can do it again.

Posted by: Patrick on Oct 4, 2007 at 11:44 PM
Fahey doesn't want a vote, because he knows he won't get it. The majority of Omaha, doesn't really give a darn about the CWS anymore. Not if it is going to cost us an "Entertainment tax" and $40 million in unaccounted for private donations. Which, he knows he'll slap onto our property-tax if the private donations don't come through. What about all the money this city has put into Rosenblatt? What about all the money still to be paid for Rosenblatt? What about all the money to tear-down Rosenblatt? What about, what about, what about!!!! Maybe we should finish paying for Rosenblatt before we tear it down. Mayor Fahey, sometime the cost-to-benefit ratio just doesn't add up. Maybe it is time to let the CWS go.

Posted by: James on Oct 4, 2007 at 11:36 PM
Keep the CWS at Rosenblatt, but build on-site parking garages and put new seats into the stadium. Rosenblatt needs adequately sized parking garages north, east, and/or south of the stadium to accomodate the CWS patrons. The parking situation at the CWS leaves visitors with a poor impression of Omaha. Parking at Rosenblatt is bush league. The second problem with Rosenblatt stadium is the seating. The seats are too small and too close together and there is not enough capacity. Rebuild the seating in Rosenblatt to accomodate more fans and make the fan's experience more comfortable by making the seats bigger and the rows further apart. Expand the grandstands upwards and build seating in the outfield to increase capacity. In my opinion it would be much cheaper for the tax payers of Omaha to build new parking garages and new seating than build a whole new stadium.

Posted by: Fred on Oct 4, 2007 at 11:32 PM
There are about as many real baseball fans in Omaha as there are real cowboys at the River City Riundup. The "fat cats" have spoken. Fall in line, peasants and pay your dues.

Posted by: nick on Oct 4, 2007 at 11:25 PM
If these comments were votes here's a quick tally: 100 - against the stadium and its tax 15 - other (for the stadium/tax or neutral) 3 - shameless gambling ads My suggestion to those with strong opinions: don't let these largely unread comments at the bottom of a webpage be your only action. Start here: http://www.ci.omaha.ne.us/departments/city_council/default.htm

Posted by: Nameless on Oct 4, 2007 at 11:10 PM
Just let the college world series go somewhere else. All it does is bring traffic problems and stuff. The only people who support this is the very few that always go to the world series. Most people out of state don't care if the World Series goes somewhere else if it's not going to be at the Rosenblatt. We do not deserve to have more taxes raised.

Posted by: Kathleen on Oct 4, 2007 at 11:08 PM
One thing is certain, death and taxes. If you live in Omaha that is a guarantee. How many hours does Mayor Fahey stay up at night thinking of ways to spend our money??

Posted by: Jessica on Oct 4, 2007 at 10:55 PM
Isn't it amazing that if you go to one of the Council Bluffs Casinos on any given day 4 out of every 5 cars have NE plates. Omaha didn't want gambling which could have raised revenue for some of these "necessities" that our leadership want us to support. Now they want to tax entertainment which will drive more people across the river to Iowa. To add more irony to this, they are building a foot bridge to help people get there faster. What about the proposal for the Water Park between Omaha and Lincoln which would have benefited many families, for many months out of the year instead of a few die hard CWS fans for 2 weeks out of the year. I would hate to see the CWS leave Omaha, but I don't think we are getting the whole scoop when we are told they will leave if we don't build a new stadium. Also, the location of downtown is ridiculous. The parking already sucks downtown, the traffic snarls would be horrendous. If you MUST build a new venue, build it somewhere easier to get to.

Posted by: Tom on Oct 4, 2007 at 10:46 PM
Looks like Council Bluffs wins again! Keep it coming Omaha. Thanks to your poor leadership us "hicks" on the other side of the river are reaping the rewards of your poor leadership. I'm sure glad I don't live in Omaha.

Posted by: Sue on Oct 4, 2007 at 10:44 PM
I really love the CWS. I wish I could afford to go! They keep saying the CWS brings in millions of dollars to the city but I never get any of it - I just get to pay more taxes! If the CWS brings in such money we should be getting a tax break instead of a new tax. It sounds like Mayor Fahey will be opening a sports bar downtown - he'll get HIS piece of those millions!

Posted by: TAX PAYER on Oct 4, 2007 at 10:39 PM
heres an idea,rebuild an amusment park where it could be used most the year round like we had years ago. that would have FREE parking so it would bring in money rather than drive it away. build it -NO TAX hike, pay for it as the revunue comes in. its time for the CWS to move on NO MORE TAXES< NO MORE TAXES

Posted by: Rich642z on Oct 4, 2007 at 10:38 PM
I am permantly Disabled and live on a small Social Security Disability check. If this passes,Iowa HERE I COME TO LIVE!!!!!! I will not have to put up with the bull in Omaha. Resturerant owners better pay attention. It is time to recall the mayor. We did it once before and we can do it again. and thats goes for the city council also. We are tired of being goughed when the mayor and some of the city council isnt listening to well.

Posted by: nursing student with a family on Oct 4, 2007 at 10:38 PM
So, I work, go to school, have children and a husband and I have to pay more money to live and eat in Omaha? I cannot wait until graduation as that may be a good time for my family to get out of here. That saddens me as I grew up here and had wanted to keep my kids here until they graduated. If I am going to be paying lots of money, I am moving to a State in which I have options as far as entertainment, e.g. moutains, beaches deserts swamps- CWS for 10 days a year is not worth this to me. I'm really angry that Fahey is selfish that he'll put what his needs are above those he is supposed to represent. BTW-Revitalize Downtown, Midtown and North Omaha-but what about the rest of Omaha-especially South Omaha if this stupid thing goes through? I am going to research the steps needed to impeach the Mayor. I can't let him do this to my family and other families/people who feel the same way.

Posted by: flik on Oct 4, 2007 at 10:37 PM
R-E-C-A-L-L

Posted by: Mike on Oct 4, 2007 at 10:30 PM
Where can I sign up to help with a recall? I'm beyond ready, willing & able to help get rid of this egomaniac. Someone else said it earlier, "what happened to 'the people' having a say in what happens in their city?"

Posted by: J on Oct 4, 2007 at 10:26 PM
To Anonymous: Regarding your math - It won't be 400,000 Omaha residents paying the tax. Remember, Omaha has the 3rd highest poverty level in the nation for African-Americans? So, let's eliminate that demographic - they're not eating out or paying for entertainment. Neither are the youngest Omahans. So, let's say, conservatively, 200,000 Omahans are paying that tax. Plus visitors to Omaha, such as myself. I guess you're missing the point, though. It's not the dollar amount. It's the fact that the tax is being *imposed*, for an *indefinite* amount of time - my guess is 20 years minimum and will probably end up being permanent like the wheel tax.

Posted by: Anonymous on Oct 4, 2007 at 10:25 PM
I live just outside of omaha, build it yourself folks im done spendin money there, head the lavista and papillion way, its a lot nicer than downtown omaha anyway, too many taxes now , and i dont care if its 2% or 7.50, im done, boycott "The big O!"

Posted by: Tammy on Oct 4, 2007 at 10:24 PM
Why can't anybody ever say no to this man??? What an ego he must have knowing that he can have whatever he wants (including entire cities -Elkhorn, who want no part of "his" empire)and the taxpayers will have to come up with the money to pay for his toys. I don't live in the city limtis (by choice), but if I did, I would absolutely go out of my way to spend ALL of my entertainment dollars outside "his" city.

Posted by: Kristie on Oct 4, 2007 at 10:21 PM
I am personally tired of paying higher taxes everytime he has a great idea. Taxes keep going up and up and what do we as tax payers get out of it?? Nothing!! We pay higher taxes and he gets more money in his pocket....no wonder he does not want a vote, he knows it would NOT pass. I think if we are going to pay for it, we should have the RIGHT to vote on it. They say it will bring more revenue to Omaha....ok, but if it is bringing more revenue to help make Omaha a better place, then why is it everytime they build something new, we pay again. Where does all that "revenue" really go???

Posted by: MJ on Oct 4, 2007 at 10:19 PM
I don't want the stadium-I don't want my taxes raised again. The problem with starting a tax is that it never goes away-even though is supposed to. If we are to pay half of 120mil. our taxes will be ongoing for eighteen years. Why do I want to pay more so that others can profit even more. BTW NCAA did not say that they opposed fixing Rosenblatt - Fahey has a hair (somewhere) to build a new stadium. He kind of reminds me a kid who wants that new toy and refuses to no for an answer. I believe that the entertainment areas in Omaha will hurt also. I live close enough to Bellevue/Council Bluffs to enjoy the very few night outs I take. Even a dollar is too much for some poeple to pay. Many in this city live paycheck to paycheck anyway, and our way to fix it is to add more taxes! We citizens need to step up and speak for ourselves. We don't not live in a dictatorship and therefore we deserve to vote on this issue. I urge you to contact the Mayors office/City Council and tell them how you feel

Posted by: Dave on Oct 4, 2007 at 10:17 PM
It seems to me that the point is why the public does not have a say in this issue. The public votes on bonds for streets, sewers, schools, etc. Why is this issue different? The public is being asked by the Mayor to pay for this via a new tax, so it seems to me that the public has the RIGHT to demand that the stadium/tax issues be put to a vote before it can move forward (and have that demand granted). Given the cost of the project, it is simply the right thing to do. Here's another thought - the $38M/yr that the series brings into the local economy is great, but the question should also be how much of that ends up in the City's coffer and how much is the NCAA paying the City to use our facility? It should be feasible to ask the NCAA to pay more to cover the expense of the new stadium on a yearly basis. This way, the entire nation helps pay for the CWS showcase instead of just Omaha. However, the new stadium should not be built until a contract is signed by the NCAA.

Posted by: Tom on Oct 4, 2007 at 10:16 PM
I was wondering if there was any movement to impeachment of the mayor because he is wasting out tax money without allowing us a chance to vote on the ball park or the walkway over the river. It seems to me he is doing the same thing Daub did by going behind out backs.

Posted by: Jim on Oct 4, 2007 at 10:13 PM
I support the new stadium and this tax is the same thing every city does to pay for their stadiums. This isn't a tax thats gonna take a big bite out of anyway. Say you are a family and you eat out and the bill is $64, with the new tax it would only be $1.28 more, thats only $66 if you eat out once a week. That chump change compared to the taxes everyone is going to be paying to upgrade the sewers in Omaha--everyone's property taxes are going to quadruple of the next 20 years. The Stadium is needed and the CWS does alot for our community--its puts in $35 million a year. The value to the community in 3 years time will pay for the stadium.

Posted by: justthefacts mamam on Oct 4, 2007 at 10:11 PM
To the people who want to vote on this issue. Stop and think for just a moment. Do you really think that a vote would produce anything but more wasted money? The problem is that we as the public really do not have much of a voice in the locale, state or federal gov. anylonger. Think about it how can the pres. lose the popular vote and still be granted the office? This little understood bill was passed in the 1880s. The U.S.A. is the greatest country ever devised, but our rights and freedoms are being eaten alive by the very gov. that has been set forth to protect those very freedoms. Dont tread on me!! Stand up and be heard!! This is your right! As a free populace this is OUR job!! Use it or forever lose it!!!!

Posted by: Phil on Oct 4, 2007 at 10:09 PM
I find it very frustrating that the mayor can so easily raise taxes for a new ballpark and a foot-bridge, but not able to offer teachers within the community a competitive wage. I've heard the aches from fire and police, but what about the educators of the community. Teachers are tax payers that basically pay their own salary. Let's invest in the community by giving back to those that try to make it better!

Posted by: Josh on Oct 4, 2007 at 09:55 PM
People! A 2% tax is a whole 2 dollars on a $100 tab. Any body that can drop $100 on a meal can probably afford the extra 2 bucks. We need to think about this... We are the only city that get an NCAA championship every year. We need to keep this here. Let's build the ballpark. THANK YOU MAYOR FAHEY for thinking progressively! P.S. I own a condo and pay taxes and I'm totally for this.

Posted by: Beau on Oct 4, 2007 at 09:41 PM
Congratultions Mr. Mayor you have succeeded in taxing the people into poverty. Don't like the tax? Just come on over to Council Bluffs and eat our food and watch our movies. By the way, the grass IS greener on the other side.

Posted by: zach on Oct 4, 2007 at 09:37 PM
WE GET TAXED TOO MUCH. I am not willing to pay anymore to get a new ballpark that i will never attend. There are alot of people that do not like baseball but like to go out to eat. What about us, we dont like to watch baseball but we like to eat why sould we have to pay for YOUR entertainment. WE SHOULDNT! I am against taxation

Posted by: Ashley on Oct 4, 2007 at 09:36 PM
Anyone who thinks this is going to be a TEMPORARY tax is a fool. I don't believe a word that comes out of Fahey's lying mouth anymore. Once that 2% tax is set, it is never going away.

Posted by: BW on Oct 4, 2007 at 09:28 PM
Well, now you see what you get with your votes Omaha. Go to the voting booth and hit all the D's or R's on the page like a bunch of sheep. We have no one to blame but ourselves. We watch the fools in the Lincoln, Washington, and now here at our own back yards. Our representatives shame us at every turn. Watching Senators debate Rush L. comments on the floor, Suing God, and now the Stadium debacle. It is about time we clean out all of these folks at election time. Think about it, Quest Center, foot bridge, Dodge street overpass and now 120m dollar ball park for two weeks a year. Whether it's local tax or federal tax it is a tax that is sucking the life out of our communities and families. We need to reign in these folks so we can afford to stay in our State and our homes. Now a tax on “entertainment”. Who do you think is going to pay that? I would rather pay for a mayoral recall than a new stadium. Then he can be remembered the way he should be.

Posted by: M on Oct 4, 2007 at 09:26 PM
There is no way that I would support this as I don't approve of a new stadium. Use the money elsewhere, finishing construction jobs, repairing streets that still have holes in them from the winter storms, anything but a new stadium. THIS IS REDICULOUS AND I HOPE FAHEY READS THESE COMMENTS!!!!!

Posted by: Anonymous on Oct 4, 2007 at 09:21 PM
This will raise $3M per year. 3M divided by 400,000 Omaha residents is $7.50. get a life whiners

Posted by: Mike on Oct 4, 2007 at 09:21 PM
WOW! ENOUGH IS ENOUGH! This is so stupid, just tax us for anything. Also just like the other post we have no voice. This state is ridiculous! It is starting to tax people out of here and I dont blame them.

Posted by: Kevin on Oct 4, 2007 at 09:17 PM
I see the need for the Mayor to get on his Bandwagon, however WHO is going to pay off the Police and Fire Pension Shortfall for Omaha city???

Posted by: Erik on Oct 4, 2007 at 09:15 PM
The new baseball stadium would be a travesty to Omaha taxpayers. The NCAA has never said it would leave Omaha if we didn't build a new venue. We still owe money on the Rosenblatt renovation, and razing it would only benefit the zoo. Raising taxes on restaurants and entertainment will only serve to drive patrons from Omaha into other areas of the city and across the river. The City Council should represent the voice of the people and stop the Mayor in his tracks.

Posted by: Barb on Oct 4, 2007 at 09:14 PM
Fahey needs to let the public vote! He's going to tax all of us all right out of Faheyville!

Posted by: Rachael on Oct 4, 2007 at 09:05 PM
Looks like the CWS will be leaving Omaha by the comments on this board. Seems like no one is in support of the CWS staying and the only way they will stay is if a new stadium is built.

Posted by: Eric on Oct 4, 2007 at 09:02 PM
Mayor Fahey knows that the new baseball stadium is not favored by the majority of Omahans. He is trying to dupe the taxpayers into believing that the NCAA will leave Omaha without the stadium. The City Council should not allow themselves to be bullied by the Mayor and represent the opinion of the voters, like they were elected to do. The last thing Omaha needs is higher taxes and another millstone around it's neck.

Posted by: Scott on Oct 4, 2007 at 08:48 PM
I lived in a city that poured millions of dollars into their riverfront, built stadiums and areas in the name of"economic development" and did so even in light of mounting crime, meager social programs and at the sacrifice of the daily quality of life of the average resident. AND they put the costs on the shoulders of its residents. It was Detroit, Michigan. And it didn't work! At the time Detroit was the fifth largest city. Now it's not even in the 10 largest! This "form-before-function" mentality in Omaha will undoubtedly have the same outcome. A new stadium does not respond to the basic needs of our "COMMUNITY" and the decision to do so comes from people who have no concept of the word. Thank you.

Posted by: Judy on Oct 4, 2007 at 08:37 PM
When is enough, enough as far as Omaha Mayor Fahey goes? Manhole covers to cover sewers that are not working, a bridge to cross yet we can't have food, clothing & shelter for the homeless, can't vote on keeping Rosenblatt, and the list goes on. Or should we say "The Beat Goes On". Maybe the Omaha City Council can help us, the middle man, beat the drums in our favor for once, and at least allow us to retain some constitutional rights especially in our right to vote.

Posted by: BJ on Oct 4, 2007 at 08:35 PM
I will then in addition to purchasing gasoline in Iowa, I will by my groceries and beverages there. Maybe we should all start using the restaurants in Iowa also. This is just a joke. I like baseball, but not to be held hostage as KC suggests.

Posted by: dennis hayes on Oct 4, 2007 at 08:26 PM
How Nice! The mayor proposes and the public pays. The simian mentality afforded by Fahey should be rejected by the public...but,of course, it won't because we don.t have a vote. If you tax daily living(sic! entertainment) we will move the entertainment venue to another city or county. But then, you know that and are simply illicinating to CYA. I think I'll vote with my feet. AMF

Posted by: Jamie on Oct 4, 2007 at 08:19 PM
IMPEACH FAHEY!!!!!!!!

Posted by: A on Oct 4, 2007 at 08:14 PM
Gosh I thought living in Omaha was suppose to benefit us in Elkhorn!!! HA! More taxes just what we need. Since I am in consider an Omaha resident, you can bet I will be voting to get the joke of the mayor out of office. I can't wait!

Posted by: Wayne E on Oct 4, 2007 at 08:12 PM
Either Mike Fahey or the People of the City of Omaha have lost touch with our system of goverment and how it works. (For the people, by the people)? Does anyone remember a Mayor named "Mike Boyle"? Maybe we could get Mr. Boyle to explain to our current Mayor how this RECALL process works! Does anyone who signed the petition to save rosenblatt could possibly start a recall another Mayor named Mikey. I'd bet anyone a nickel that we could get more than 14,000 signatures. It doesn't seem like anyone has gotten Mayor Mikey attention yet. Someone has to start the paper! Go getum Mikey! We'll miss you Mikey, but not for long.

Posted by: Rod on Oct 4, 2007 at 08:08 PM
You guys should recall Fahey. Meanwhile i would like to extend an invitation to all our brothers in Omaha to come south and enjoy your next meal. You know the saying "money talks and...".

Posted by: Betty on Oct 4, 2007 at 08:07 PM
The city still owes $13,000,000 ~ yes, $13 million for past Rosenblatt improvements. When/how will that be paid off? And, how much will be spent on Rosenblatt improvements between now and the completion of Fahey's new toy? When Fahey gets his new toy, what will he do with OUR stadium? The zoo doesn't want the space. I've had CWS box seats since 1971. I don't want a new stadium in NoDo. "Omaha will lose the CWS" scare tactic, sounds like it came straight from the Bush administration's play book! Fahey gave the NCAA one proposal ~ his vision ~ and that did not include Rosenblatt! Since when does an Omaha elected official not represent the people who elected him? If Dictator Fahey doesn't want a vote by the people, who elected him, HE should pay for HIS new stadium!

Posted by: Sam on Oct 4, 2007 at 08:07 PM
Aren't there checks and balances when a city has a runaway mayor? Why hasn't a recall / impeachment movement been started? Is the political machine and / or powers to be that powerful that they can override the wishes of the people?

Posted by: Minnie on Oct 4, 2007 at 08:05 PM
Thank you Mayor Fahey for trying to take us from the 4th highest taxed state to No. 1. If we can't be no. 1 in football under Callahan / Pederson, then at least we can be no. 1 in something else - taxation.

Posted by: TIM on Oct 4, 2007 at 08:05 PM
I THINK WE HEARD THIS SAME SONG FROM THE PUBLIC ABOUT 8 YEARS AGO WHEN THE CITY WANTED TO BUILD THE QWEST CENTER. PRETTY SIMPLE IF THE 2% IS GOING TO BREAK YOU, NOT SURE YOU SHOULD BE DINING OUT ANYWAY. BUILD THE STADIUM. WHEN EVENTS LIKE THIS AND OTHER VENTURES DECIDE TO LEAVE OMAHA THEN YOU REALLY WILL HAVE A SOMETHING TO COMPLAIN ABOUT SINCE THE TAX REVENUES WONT BE THERE.

Posted by: Liz on Oct 4, 2007 at 08:01 PM
I am sick and tired of the NCAA holding a gun to our heads every time it wants something. Let them take the CWS elsewhere and see if they can get away with the tactics they use on Omaha. As for the mayor, the word "recall" should be uppermost in his feeble mind when he forces another tax on us.

Posted by: Gambling with The Good life on Oct 4, 2007 at 08:01 PM
Stop Voting NO to CASINOS! The good life has long since left, so why not gain the benifits from having legalized gambling? There would be enough money in the city coffers to pay for the Stadium, the sewer problems as well as money left over for the homeless shelters! Plus, there would be more jobs generated! You The Voters Can Say YES!!!!!!! and solve your problems instead of whinning about the high taxes in NE.....

Posted by: timetomove on Oct 4, 2007 at 07:59 PM
So, Mayor Fahey does not want the tax put to a public vote. Why is that Mr. Mayor? I'm sick and tired of this administration forcing his will on the people of Omaha. He knows how the vote would turn out and that why he doesn't want the people to have a say. I'm saying NO tax, NO stadium. Read my lips Mr. Mayor. NO

Posted by: Clarke on Oct 4, 2007 at 07:56 PM
Fahey is just the schill. He doesn't have enough of what it takes to pull this off himself. The real power behind this is the "Downtown Aksarben Elite". We all know the ones I'm talking about. They've been running Omaha for years. They're pretty determined to get a nice new stadium to build their luxury skyboxes on. Then they can all get together at the games and pat each other on the back and regail each other with stories of their greatness.

Posted by: Pat on Oct 4, 2007 at 07:54 PM
Let me get this right Mr. Mayor, you are asking to place a 2% tax on entertainment. Does this includ the entertaining idea of your new ball stadium. Please mayor go home, get some sleep, then when you wake up you'll realize that this is nothing more then the dream of an fool.

Posted by: cj on Oct 4, 2007 at 07:50 PM
Omaha taxpayers would not support this if it went to a public vote.

Posted by: vic on Oct 4, 2007 at 07:46 PM
We have been manuevered by our 'illustrious' mayor and his writing staff to believe we will lose the College World Series if we don't do what he says--build a new stadium. This all started because the Royals wanted a smaller stadium--didn't even involve the CWS. If Fahey had listened to the commentators of the CWS games he would have heard the compliments and very positive things they had to say about Rosenblatt. I think part of Fahey's problem with Rosenblatt Stadium is that it's not Fahey Stadium. 2% isn't much--now. How long will it stay 2%--soon it'l be 3, then 4, then higher. I would like to retire and enjoy my 'golden' years with my spouse--at this rate I'll never be able to because I'll be paying for things I don't even want. Why doesn't Mayor Fahey forget about the stadium and concentrate on finishing up on some the street projects that have been sitting around unfinished and blocking traffic for months. If our city council votes his way they're just as bad as he is!

Posted by: Chris on Oct 4, 2007 at 07:32 PM
Seems like Fahey thinks the people of Omaha are too stupid to decide what to spend their own money on. Is he betting that they are also too stupid to remember who to vote against? Has he forgotten how he got this job to begin with?

Posted by: BoBo on Oct 4, 2007 at 07:31 PM
Time to get this puppet idiot out of office. Put a recall petition in front of me and I'll sign it.

Posted by: George on Oct 4, 2007 at 07:30 PM
Let's start a Fahey tax. Let's tax Fahey alone for the cost of the stadium. It is his idea.

Posted by: K.C. on Oct 4, 2007 at 07:22 PM
No way would I support a tax for a new ballpark. I am a College World Series fan, however I don't believe in being held hostage by the NCAA. The current park with some improvements would keep the CWS. Omaha taxpayers would not support this if it went to a public vote and FAHEY KNOWS it!! Is this to keep the CWS or to once again benefit Creighton? City Council wake up !!!

Posted by: mmb on Oct 4, 2007 at 07:20 PM
Can someone please remind me just what benefit we individuals taxpayers will get from the CWS staying in Omaha until the end of time?? The positive impact on the economy will NOT be felt by anyone but hotels, restaurants and other businesses near the stadium. There is absolutely no benefit to the individual taxpayer or resident of Omaha, at least none that I can see. First I thought that maybe we'd benefit from lower prices at these business who will be "economically benefitted" but that 2% entertainment tax will wipe out anything good that would come from that. I will not lie, I LOVE the CWS, but it is not fair that hundreds of thousands of Omaha residents shall be taxed to keep it here. Maybe the businesses who will benefit should kick in the millions it will take to build the stadium!!!

Posted by: the other Dan on Oct 4, 2007 at 07:12 PM
First things first this town does need the CWS the sad boring people who don't enjoy it to bad. What the hasn't considered is the more reasonable ways of paying for his buddies to over charge to build a stadium that he will try to put his own name on. Maybe after they sell the naming rites to the stadium they should take a collection from all of the over priced parking garage owners Downtown that will no doubt charge 4 times the average wage in this town to park. Then collect from all the over Priced hotels the downtown is having pop up knowing this stadium has been a done deal for a long time.Then what ever is left instead of raising money for his campaign to be re-elected and donate the waste of money.

Posted by: Roger on Oct 4, 2007 at 07:10 PM
Let's put an extra tax on the tickets for the college world series, vendors, etc. Most people in Omaha don't even get the chance to attend the games, so tax the ones who will be using and enjoying it. Omaha and NE are taxing it's people to the hilt. How much more can we all afford to pay to live here? It definately should be put to a vote, not ramrodded thru without an imput from all of us citizens.

Posted by: Frank on Oct 4, 2007 at 07:08 PM
What about the Royals? It will be there new stadium also. How much are they putting in for the new stadium???????????

Posted by: Dick on Oct 4, 2007 at 06:57 PM
116 million to build. Wanna bet. 2%tax increase. Wanna bet. Taxpayers no voice and getting scammed. No bet

Posted by: glenn on Oct 4, 2007 at 06:56 PM
It has beem said the general public of Omaha does not have a vote concerning the new baseball stadium or the tax increase necessary to fund it; I would suggest that is not true. We do have the authority and the power to vote those who support this effort out of office during the next general election. I would also suggest you contact your City Councilman and let them know if he/she supports this effort you will not support them at the next election. The concept "Of the People", "By the People", and "For the People" has long since been abandoned by this city and many others. If the CWS wants to go to another city, I would say let them go and see what type of fan support they receive there. It amazes me that the State of Nebraska and the City of Omaha wonder why people leave this area. It is not the weather; it is the TAXES STUPID! If this plan comes to pass, I would like to think we would see a total change in administration of the city at the next election; if not blame yourself.

Posted by: Jeremy on Oct 4, 2007 at 06:54 PM
I am glad I live in lavista, I guess I will keep my money over here. I agree, we don't need another stadium. And what happend to his promise to get money from investors, even they can't see the logic in this.. BOOOO Mayor Fahey!!!

Posted by: J. Svoboda on Oct 4, 2007 at 06:54 PM
With the exception of almost 7 years in the military I have lived in Omaha all of my life. I enjoyed going to Rosenblatt as a child and taking my children there as an adult. I DO NOT support another stadium being built (FAHEY BALL PARK). I think Mr. Fahey should remember a lesson from our forefathers that occured on December 16,1773 due to taxation without representation (The Boston Tea Party. There have been several changes to this city that the taxpayers have not been listened to by the local government. Is Fahey's qwest for a new stadium his turning point to end a political career? One way or another the local citizens (yes even the newest citizens to Omaha our friends in Elkhorn) will have a say at the polling place.

Posted by: Bad choice on Oct 4, 2007 at 06:49 PM
There is no such thing as a temporary tax in this city. I am so tired of having my taxes raised. Everyone needs to contact the mayor/city council and give them your opinion. If they don't listen-IMPEACH-Boyle was impeached for less. Fix the problems in Omaha before you ask us to pay taxes on something that only happens two weeks out of the year. Pave all the streets, fix the sewer, help the homeless etc. Enough is Enough.

Posted by: Kathy on Oct 4, 2007 at 06:49 PM
Yes I live in the Tax me state. Did we forget that are taxes are going up greatley for the upgrade on sewers! This we need. If the mayor wants his name on something so badley put it on the manhole covers that are to be replaced also. I believe sewers are more important than a New Rosenblat. It is only full up during College World series what about the rest of the time? Lets pay off his last two great idieas first the Quest Center & Hotel & Walking bridge.

Posted by: Terry on Oct 4, 2007 at 06:48 PM
A 2% tax to pay for a new stadium a tax increase to cover the shortfall in the police/fire pensions a tax increase to cover Fahey's deferral of Qwest Center debt payments a tax increase to pay for the sewer separation project a tax increase to get road and bridges up to snuff = I move out of Omaha!

Posted by: Jason on Oct 4, 2007 at 06:47 PM
Just watching from up North but wasn't the cost for this new stadium suppose to be something like 65-75 million at first? That's what I remember reading anyway. Now it is 120 million?!? Wow. I thought renovating Rosenblatt was only suppose to be around 30 million. I guess they were a bit off on that too. Omaha needs to keep the CWS for the economic benefits but the mayor does not need to add another tax to Omaha to do it. I was looking forward to moving back to Omaha soon. Now I think I will live in Fremont, Valley, or some other close town that does not have a tax for every little thing. I bet they have sewers that work too!

Posted by: Jason on Oct 4, 2007 at 06:46 PM
Imagine that! The city council wants to get rid of one guy off a fire truck and use that money "more than likely" to help build a new baseball field for who? Oh yeah, not Omaha, but the NCAA. Just to keep the "Road to Omaha" slogan alive. What's next? Toll booth to go down Dodge expressway?

Posted by: Yippie on Oct 4, 2007 at 06:46 PM
Great lets bring in the NEW and IMPROVED stadium and we won’t have the police control we need and we will have a bunch of homeless people sleeping there just like the Gene Lehey Mall that we are so proud to have. I think it is a great idea I am so glad I didn’t vote for Fahey. And you people who say what’s a few bucks and it will bring in all this money to our great state. Where do we the people benefit from it??? Higher crime, more shootings all for a few more bucks. Thanks. And once we get this great stadium and they raise the prices of the tickets how many middle class families can afford them?

Posted by: Rose on Oct 4, 2007 at 06:46 PM
I am very upset with Fahey's new tax plan - I don't want a new stadium and I definitely don't want higher taxes. We should have the right as taxpayers to vote on this proposal. Our forefathers had a real problem with "taxation without representation" and so do I.

Posted by: J on Oct 4, 2007 at 06:44 PM
When I travel, I'm used to paying various entertainment taxes of this nature. Of course, I generally get something for my money. As a resident of Douglas Co., not Omaha, I don't benefit from the CWS. No hotels, few restaurants. No movie theaters. So, why do I get to pay for it when I go to Omaha and Elkhorn (now Omaha) for a movie or my one dining night out a week? Especially since I can't vote for Omaha's mayor or express my views to an Omaha Councilman? If I *lived* in Omaha, I would be furious that Mayor Fahey was pulling an end-run around the democratic process.

Posted by: Anonymous on Oct 4, 2007 at 06:42 PM
I WOULD PAY MORE IF THE NEW STADIUM WAS IN ANOTHER AREA LIKE BETWEEN OMAHA AND LINCOLN WHERE WE CAN HAVE LOTS OF PARKING AND ROOM FOR RV'S AND TAILGATEING AND LOTS OF ENTRANCES FOR ALL GENERAL ADMITION TO GET IN AND STAY SEATED FOR BOTH GAMES THERE COULD BE HOTELS,FOOD ALL KINDS OF STUFF IN A UNCRAMPT AREA WERE GOING IN THE WRONG DIRECTION WITH THIS STADIUM THERES ALLREADY A MESS WITH TRAFIFC DOWNTOWN LETS NOT ADD TO IT

Posted by: Ed on Oct 4, 2007 at 06:42 PM
No! Taxes, insurance, inflation keep going up! City services seem like they keep going down (count the accidents due to poor roads, potholes, poorly managed traffic lights. City and taxpayer related pension funds are in BIG trouble. Yet, pay and rea l estate valuations keep going down. Someone, such as Fahe should see the big picture and see that something is terribly out of whack, no more tax increases!

Posted by: Pat on Oct 4, 2007 at 06:39 PM
Mr. Mayor, Why not tax corporate Omaha, (restaurants, hotels, businesses? They are the ones that will benefit financially from the staduim. All I will get is a higher ticket price to get into the stadium and higher taxes. Mayor. Fahey, I think you have forgotten who you are representing.

Posted by: Jerry on Oct 4, 2007 at 06:31 PM
We already have a stadium we just sunk $30 million into. We don't want to pay for another that will get used 2 weeks a year. We do not need a footbridge to a swamp either. That money could have been spent on sewers. But wait, lets pay more taxes for those too. Our taxaholic mayor needs to go!!

Posted by: Deb on Oct 4, 2007 at 06:28 PM
We have enjoyed a trip to Omaha weekly for 30 years for a nice dinner on Saturday night. Now we will save time, money and gas for our car. It's time we explore other cities for the next 30 years. Sorry Omaha. The people that use this luxury entertainment can afford the tax. Business before pleasure. If Omaha needs the tax for a worthy cause, then by all means do what you have to do. But does Omaha need 2 stadiums or one. Omaha already has a fine stadium. Maybe the sky is the limit for Fahey and the gang but what about the thousands of people who really don't have the money?

Posted by: Concerned on Oct 4, 2007 at 06:25 PM
If we knew it would stay an entertainment tax, that would be one thing even though I don't support it. However, we all know that folks will go outside Omaha for their entertainment and then they will find another way to pass it down to the taxpayers. I don't agree with building it in downtown O where it will be difficult to get to and unappealing. If a new one needed to be done why not place it better.

Posted by: Jim on Oct 4, 2007 at 06:25 PM
I do not approve of any kind of new tax just to keep an event that only lasts 2 weeks out of a year! If the city would spend the money on something like an amusement park, we would reap the awards for at least 14 weeks out of the year. This city offers very little for familys with kids, except of course the zoo.

Posted by: Chris on Oct 4, 2007 at 06:23 PM
As taxes go, a two or three year two percent tax on restaurant meals is a relatively painless way to pay for a stadium that will bring millions of dollars into Omaha for decades. We need to remember this short-term tax is a long-term investment that will pay steadily increasing dividends to our children and grandchildren.

Posted by: Ed on Oct 4, 2007 at 06:21 PM
Such a tax is 100% UNACCEPTABLE - certainly without any public vote to approve an unnecessary new Baseball stadium. The public must demand that the NCAA statement on a new stadium be made public - for all we know the NCAA may actually feel that Rosenblatt is totally acceptable for the future. Fahey is using the panic technique to spread unsubstantiated fears that the NCAA demands a new stadium before extensions - let's see the actual document where the NCAA actually makes these demands. I actually feel Fahey is just building a monument to himself and happily funding his many in-town construction industry friends. If this project is approved expect many cost overruns that we, the taxpayers, will have to fund. Instead of a new stadium, why does he not spend his time fix the money losses on the Qwest that we are eating. NO -- NO -- NO !!!

Posted by: Mike on Oct 4, 2007 at 06:21 PM
I,as well as a large portion of Omaha residents already live by some form of a budget which already feels our states outragous taxes let alone consistantly rising gas prices. Those of us who are financially resonsible know not to indulge beyond our means. I won't buy a plasma tv until I can afford it as it's not a neccesity. Unfotunately our mayor doesn't posses this sense of responsibility and we are stuck footing the bill for a luxury that many of us don't even want. Thanks Mr. Mayor for thinking of me. Is there nothing besides the CWS that Omahan's can be proud of? Either way, give the payors a vote, it's not your money to spend. Never eating out again.

Posted by: Hal on Oct 4, 2007 at 06:20 PM
I believe the people of Omaha should be allowed to vote on the downtown stadium. I would encourage everyone to contact their councilman to let them know their feelings.

Posted by: Bonnie on Oct 4, 2007 at 06:19 PM
I am mot in favor of a tax on food and entertainment. Fahey started this to make a lasting name for himself and not for the the people of Omaha. Our taxes are too high now. Will the College World Series leave Omaha if we don't have a new stadium? It's been in Omaha for years and if the College World Series doesn't feel they should keep the tradition here at Rosenblatt, well, shame on them! The people of Omaha cannot keep being taxed to death!

Posted by: Joe Provost on Oct 4, 2007 at 06:19 PM
With all the talk about the new stadium really makes me think is it really worth all the money for an event that lasts only 2 weeks a year. Then the Mayor is coming up with not one tax but three new taxes to pay for it, an entertainment tax, a prepared food tax and beverage tax. How many more taxes can the state of Nebraska and Omaha come up with ? This is really going to hurt the low income families the most. If they want to go to a show or out to eat it will take a bigger bite out of there budget and for the most part won't get to go to the ball park anyway. Has the mayor even thought of the traffic jams this is going to cause on game day? People coming in from the air port will have a tuff time driving down abbot drive. The mayor talks about all the new jobs, What new jobs ?It is just moving from one location to another other. I would really like to see the money spent on the old stadium where the tradition is and find privite money to pay for it.

Posted by: Ed on Oct 4, 2007 at 06:19 PM
Let the people vote on the stadium and the tax proposal. My vote would be no to a new stadium and no to the 2% tax.

Posted by: Laurie on Oct 4, 2007 at 06:17 PM
Overall the 2% increase is not a lot for eating out occasionally. My question to everyone is how long will they impose this tax. If it is paid off after a number of years, they will continue to tax us. Make an expiration on the tax. When the stadium is paid for, the tax ends and require them to use a large percentage of the profits to pay down the balance. Otherwise, it will be just like the Qwest center.We will be charged astronomical fees forever while they make record profits. Also, what other fees will they charge for this new stadium, $20 parking, $15 soft drink. This will not be the only fee that they charge. If you think it is only 2%, you are fooling yourself. WAKE UP!

Posted by: dan on Oct 4, 2007 at 06:16 PM
wow, another tax. now theres people payig for this 3 times more. this is going to turn out to be another debt. like the qwest center. if any improvement for the city like this, the bridge, and the qwest center, should be a city vote not just do it and and more tax. this mayor is b.s. im planning on moving to another state. all we do is spend and nothing is comming back stop and think... there is not alot of people that wants this , and if it dont work who pays.we do. we need to vote

Posted by: Rex on Oct 4, 2007 at 06:15 PM
I think that any council member that votes for the tax increase should be voted out.We omahan's have more than our fair share of tax's,if the NCAA doesn't like rosenblat then let them move.

Posted by: Bill on Oct 4, 2007 at 06:15 PM
I oppose more taxes. Like CWS but retired here from Missouri to be near children for help in our old age. It costs me $400 more to drive a car here and $5000 more in property and school taxes. Can I afford the luxury of the good life in Nebraska? Everyday I question it more and more but where does this leave me with no other family?

Posted by: steve on Oct 4, 2007 at 06:15 PM
As a Sarpy County taxpayer I’m relieved to not have the extra burden that the new stadium, the unfunded extravagent pensions, the sanitary sewer rebuilding etc. will put on Omaha’s taxpayers. In fact the more taxes and fees Omaha piles on, the stronger and more diverse Sarpy County business becomes. We already shop less now in Omaha than the past. Another new tax will simply increase that trend for more and more people living and spending outside of the Omaha tax excesses..

Posted by: John on Oct 4, 2007 at 06:15 PM
Here we go again -- another tax! I am sick and tired of politicians who's only answer whenever they want something is - tax! I do not use the Rosenblatt, don't go to the games and don't care whether we keep the College World Series, period. If they want a new stadium, figure out something to cut to pay for it. The Mayor is afraid of a vote because he knows what would happen -- the people will speak. Read my lips -- no new taxes!!!

Posted by: Chuck on Oct 4, 2007 at 06:14 PM
Losing the CWS would be a disaster, and one that can be prevented with a relatively small investment! Add to that the new development that a new stadium would spur, thus raising the tax base in the NoDo area and you've got a win-win situation! No brainer in my book.

Posted by: Pam on Oct 4, 2007 at 06:12 PM
Pretty bold of the mayor to propose a new tax without council/voter approval. Just another reason for me (a retiree) to move to another state. Nebr. is ridiculous for taxing it's citizens blind and Omaha inparticular. Pay for the new stadium with the ONE TIME TAX on automobile/tax license which has lasted for 25 yrs. Where is THAT money going? Or, sell my house for the assessors' "value", and I'll give the city the difference between what the city says it's worth, and what I get from a buyer. Omaha, Nebr., has gone to the dogs via the politicians. Good luck to you all, I'm gone......

Posted by: Vinton on Oct 4, 2007 at 06:11 PM
I would rather lose the College World Series than be burdened with another tax.

Posted by: Sally on Oct 4, 2007 at 06:10 PM
This tax is ridiculous! It already costs so much to eat out and go to the movies. Why not tax the ticket buyers of the CWS? At least the stadium would be paid for by people who are actually at the stadium. The mayor knows this topic could not be put to a public vote because the public would vote it down so fast! Why build a stadium that will only be used (heavily) two weeks out of 50? BOO to the new tax! :(

Posted by: Mike on Oct 4, 2007 at 06:10 PM
Ok Dan and Mr. Baseball fan, looks like you guys have the bucks so why don't you pay for the new stadium.

Posted by: Robert on Oct 4, 2007 at 06:10 PM
Mayor Fahey is a man of vision. He is an intelligent civic leader interested in the success of Omaha. We can not lose the Series over a pitance tax for the overall benefit to the city. Step up City Council and let's get this done.

Posted by: Ron Strong on Oct 4, 2007 at 06:09 PM
This sounds a whole lot like taxation without representation. I know my family will avoid the many fine eating establishments in Omaha if this tax without public consent is passed by a city council that is SUPPOSED to represent the people.

Posted by: JW on Oct 4, 2007 at 06:09 PM
I do not support more taxes, period. It won't matter that the stadium brings in more revenue to the city when all of its citizens move across the bridge. This is just craziness! We do not have great benefits here considering all of the taxes we already pay. Wake up Omaha!

Posted by: Klayton on Oct 4, 2007 at 06:07 PM
Absolutely, Omaha should support a tax to preserve the financial benefit of the College World Series in our fine city. We can not afford to lose this opportunity.

Posted by: Jacob on Oct 4, 2007 at 06:07 PM
I think the tax idea sounds horrible! If we are already one of highest taxed states in the country why add more? But the bottom line is Roesenblatt is at th twilight of it's career. WE NEED A NEW STADIUN

Posted by: M on Oct 4, 2007 at 06:07 PM
Been saying that Fahey would do something with taxes. I read a comment on another website a while back and this individual stated that he/she would sue for "Taxation without Representation". I think that's a great idea. I don't have anymore money to give to this city. If this goes through, I will be spending my time in Bellevue for dining and movies. This is crazy. Who can afford to live here??? Perhaps recalling Mayor Fahey would be a very positive thing. Hopefully someone starts the proceedure and lets the public know where to sign. I'll be one of the first people in line.

Posted by: Kevin on Oct 4, 2007 at 06:07 PM
Omaha must build the new ballpark and I think this particular "entertainment tax" is a step in the right direction. It would tax us only when we choose to be taxed...when we eat out, buy tickets for events, or park at entertainment venues. As a homeowner and taxpayer in Omaha I would accept that alternative because it is something I could have control of myself. Those who still believe we can somehow avoid building a state of the art facility downtown and keep the CWS in Omaha are fooling themselves. We should not give other cities the opportunity to take what they covet most from Omaha, the College World Series. Even if there was a vote, and I dont think there should be, I would vote for this tax. Build the new ballpark, build it bigger, better, and brighter than anyone expects, and demand the NCAA allows Omaha to keep the College World Series permanently. For that, I'd tax myself every time I went out.

Posted by: Henry on Oct 4, 2007 at 06:07 PM
I know a good way to fund the stadium; why don't the politicians take a pay cut! A 2% cut out their wages might make them see reality!

Posted by: Allan love jr on Oct 4, 2007 at 06:06 PM
Don't worry be happy. Just be happy that they don't start charging a TAX for every word that comes out of someones mouth. Every word could cost you!

Posted by: Jim on Oct 4, 2007 at 06:05 PM
We don't want to pay taxes for a new stadium. We already have a perfectly good stadium. We do not want to pay for a footbridge we don't need, either. We do need a new Mayor.

Posted by: Josh on Oct 4, 2007 at 06:02 PM
You people are all cry babies. This 2% tax on dining and drinking is a whopping extra buck on a 50 dollar tab. And yes I'm a property owner too so I pay taxes. You want the CWS to leave and take the $38M a year it adds to the economy here? Then lets see what happens you our property taxes. Use your heads a bit, we are the only city that gets to host an NCAA championship every year, we need to keep it. THANK YOU MAYOR FAHEY for thinking progressively! BUILD THE BALLPARK!!!

Posted by: Reality Czech on Oct 4, 2007 at 06:00 PM
We could use a man like Gene Leahy or Bernie Simon running this city right about now. Omaha is like a car going downhill without brakes.

Posted by: Joe on Oct 4, 2007 at 05:49 PM
A 2% entertainment/dining out tax isn't much when you look at other metropolitan cities and their entertainment taxes, but then again those cities don't have the property tax rates Omaha does. Forget about sewers, shootings and robberies, the CWS is priority one. What is the NCAA going to think when the new stadium floods due to poor sewers or CWS attendees get robbed or shot.

Posted by: citiznen on Oct 4, 2007 at 05:46 PM
Remember, Omaha, the city council could stop this, but most are Fahey Fans, and political cowards (Jim Welch is exempt from the coward list).

Posted by: Ryan on Oct 4, 2007 at 05:37 PM
I think wait staff at restaurants should rally against this tax. I doubt that restaurant attendance will suffer (Omaha likes to eat out) but I do believe tips will suffer. Baseball is pointless, boring sport any way. Tax the admission tickets and let the fans pay for it.

Posted by: Grant on Oct 4, 2007 at 05:30 PM
Non of this would be an issue if we had casinos in Nebraska. It would increase the amount of hotels for CWS attendees and the casinos would make more money during the tourney. Plus the revenue would pay for the ball field. A win win situation.

Posted by: Floyd on Oct 4, 2007 at 05:28 PM
What's next a "breathing tax" or "living tax"?

Posted by: olen on Oct 4, 2007 at 05:28 PM
it's incredibly arrogant of mayor Fahey to think he can force the citizens of omaha to finance a new stadium without their being afforded the right to vote on the issue. I didn't vote for him before and I surely will not vote for him in the future. Infact we recalled Mike boyle for less cause than this. Mr Fahey was elected to administer the city, not to arbitrarily commit Omaha citzens to pay up to 120 million dollars for a stadium we do not need just to stroke his vanity! Our local resturants are under enough pressure from the casinos across the river without making it even more expensive for them to do business. Just ask the employees of Mr C's, the latest casuality. It also increases the paperwork of all the resturants as they have to keep tax records and that will also increase the cost of dining out as the owners will be forced to add the administrative cost to the prices. Good job Mr Fahey. Just don't expect to keep your job for long if Omahans have their way!

Posted by: Good Homecooking on Oct 4, 2007 at 05:27 PM
Well, maybe we should raise the tax even higher and more people would start eating at home--more healthfully.

Posted by: Deb on Oct 4, 2007 at 05:27 PM
Is Mayor Fahey going back on what he said previously? What other taxes will he come up with to build his new stadium? The economy is not doing well but still the politicians raise taxes so that the "Little Guy" can't even afford to take his family out for a night on the town. 2% may noy seem like a lot but it will add up if you do several things in your night out. This should be voted on by Omaha residents and should not be only Mayor Fahey's decision.

Posted by: Jay on Oct 4, 2007 at 05:26 PM
Impeach Fahey and the CWS we would get along just fine without them both.

Posted by: Tonya on Oct 4, 2007 at 05:19 PM
Omaha is one of the highest taxed places to live in the country. This is ridiculous! He doesn't want us to vote because he knows we don't want it! Is he gonna bleed us dry by his stupid taxes? I know, if he wants the stadium that bad, then why doesn't he pay for it himself or solicit Warren Buffet?! I have lived in Omaha my whole life, but now I can't wait to leave and find a cheaper more safer place to live.

Posted by: Petproject on Oct 4, 2007 at 05:19 PM
Does anyone think this is a 'pet project' for the contractor/developer buddies of the city administrators. Next, we will be building another high rise parking garage because the downtown stadium has eaten up all the surface parking--more $$$$. Downtown Omaha is on the go. It is not dependent upon another publicly funded enterprise at the cost of an established neighborhood. What will happen to all those So. Omaha churches that rely upon the series for fund raisers. What about the services they provide to their demographic. Can't rely upon the city for any support of homeless housing--Open Door mission was allowed to close its doors. As citizens, insist on the whole story, think beyond what you are being told. We have been lucky hanging on to our AAA bond rating with the Quest funding. Don't allow this to go further without having both locations fully explored. It is not about new vs old. It is about fiscal responsibility. Insist upon it. We don't need more taxes in Omaha!

Posted by: DB on Oct 4, 2007 at 05:19 PM
Is any of us really surprised that a new tax would come out of this? I never doubted it for a second. One thing to say about Fahey is that his lameness is consistent

Posted by: Dan on Oct 4, 2007 at 05:17 PM
Am I the only one here who thinks paying 10 to 20 cents more when I eat out is not a big deal? Seriously, how many of us will end up at some point enjoying this new facility? And to keep a signature event here, 10 to 20 cents on occasion is a small price. Grow up folks!

Posted by: FedUp on Oct 4, 2007 at 05:16 PM
Is it possible to impeach a mayor and city council ? We need to look into this ! GET OUT OF MY WALLET !!!!!!!

Posted by: John on Oct 4, 2007 at 05:13 PM
He does not want a vote because it will never pass. Dictator Fahey. I never voted for him, I hope all of you who did are happy. What a joke

Posted by: Bernie on Oct 4, 2007 at 05:10 PM
THE ONLY MONEY THAT SHOULD BE SPENT ON THE CWS IS A ONE WAY TICKET OUT OF OMAHA FOR THE CWS AND THE MAYOR.

Posted by: Baseball Fan on Oct 4, 2007 at 05:07 PM
Do you know how much money Omaha will lose if we lose the CWS and how much money a stadium would bring to downtown retailers?! Use your head Omaha!! ..chip in 2% on your fun nights out and we'll gain the long term income we need to get a well staffed police/fire force. Believe me, you'll waste more money on gas driving to a resturant out of town. If you don't want to contribute, stay home!!

Posted by: Fed Up on Oct 4, 2007 at 05:06 PM
Remember everybody. Almost everything is less expensive in Council Bluffs. Why? BECAUSE THEY HAVE CASINO GAMBLING ! They have very good restaurants there so we will all go across the river...First no smoking and now this new tax. What does our state government have against restaurant owners ? If this tax passes, I will never eat at another Omaha restaurant again. Sorry restaurant owners. It's not your fault. Call the mayor now ! He is doing his best you put you out of business.

Posted by: eyes on Oct 4, 2007 at 05:05 PM
Say NO! to the Big O!

Posted by: Sam on Oct 4, 2007 at 05:04 PM
Fahey is a liar and a cheat. He led us down a primrose path telling us he stadium would cost $75 million, and taxes would not be the means of paying for it. Now, it is a substantially higher cost - and taxes are the plan. Oust Fahey - he is the most dishonest politician. And that is saying something.

Posted by: Willy on Oct 4, 2007 at 05:04 PM
Do the people have anything to say about this? Last time I checked we were supposed be living in a Democracy. Why are we saddled with Funding Fahey's Fantasy Follies? Maybe that would be a good slogan for his re-election campaign.

Posted by: poorboy on Oct 4, 2007 at 05:03 PM
Time to move from Douglas County!! If I wanted to live somewhere expensive I would have chosen Minn/St.Paul or Denver, come on mayor your spending is Washington style, What happen to the NCAA funding??? maybe I misunderstood that whole thing but I guess what they say is true--the RICH keep getting RICHER off the middle and lower class- Come on Omaha pull together and KNOCK this problem out!!!!!

Posted by: Marie on Oct 4, 2007 at 05:01 PM
First a 2% tax on eating out - what else will he tax for his stadium? Tax, tax, tax! Enough!

Posted by: carey on Oct 4, 2007 at 05:01 PM
I guess when you live in the BIG 0 you truly never have a say in anything in this city.

Posted by: Ashley on Oct 4, 2007 at 05:00 PM
It's okay, keep sending your money over the river to Iowa!!

Posted by: reality check on Oct 4, 2007 at 04:57 PM
Fahey definitely isn't part of a representative government, more like a dictatorship, and any councilman that listens to him should be recalled WITH fahey. And me an my family will say good-bye to Omaha restraunts. BYE! BYE!

Posted by: Jill on Oct 4, 2007 at 04:57 PM
Is it Mayor Fahey or Dictator Fahey?

Posted by: Jim on Oct 4, 2007 at 04:56 PM
Yup, I told you it was a done deal, and the tax payers are funding it completely. Tax-and-spend Fahey has figured a way to get it done, and he's portraying it as a necessity with a simple solution. Notice how the pending sewer tax rate hike and NoDo violence goes unmentioned though? Those are only real issues the city faces. Omaha, Nebraska is going to be a bankrupt city riddled with violence, where residents who have a choice live in neighboring cities/counties, while those who can't afford to move out are statistical victims. We'll have Fahey Field though!

Posted by: Pam on Oct 4, 2007 at 04:53 PM
I guess my family will be eating out in Valley, Waterloo, Gretna, might even go to Fremont.

Posted by: Stephanie on Oct 4, 2007 at 04:52 PM
Nice. Really nice. Sounds like I'll be dining in LaVista and Bellevue!!

Posted by: G on Oct 4, 2007 at 04:51 PM
Well I know my family and I will be eating in Bellevue and C.B now,when this tax goes through. I will never eat out in Omaha again to pay for a stadium I don't want!!

Posted by: John on Oct 4, 2007 at 04:50 PM
Maybe the mayor should use his retirement money to fund the ball park, since he's going to make money off of the deal when he is done serving as mayor. We do not need another tax to build a new ball park, rebuild the one being used presently and add some two-three story parking.

Posted by: A. Heckler on Oct 4, 2007 at 04:50 PM
Get ready folks! Here it comes. Our beloved mayor that only has our best interests in mind, has proposed a restaurant TAX to pay for HIS new baseball stadium. TAX TAX TAX ! Call your councilman, call the mayors hotline, call the President. Call anybody you can think of to put a stop to this stupidity ! Mr. Mayor has bucks. If he wants it, let him pay for it !

Posted by: Terri on Oct 4, 2007 at 04:48 PM
Seriously?! Raise our diners taxes for a stadium that will hardly get used? Get real Fahey. Learn how to do something useful without taxing us to death.

Posted by: Ken on Oct 4, 2007 at 04:47 PM
Hmm, I see a certain irony here. The people that will be funding the majority of this are obviously people who eat out a lot. Stereotypically, people who eat out a lot are the ones that have a weight problem. So, the people who are funding the majority of this are the same people who won't be able to fit in the seats at the new stadium. Funny.

Posted by: Theresa on Oct 4, 2007 at 04:47 PM
Well...duh..we knew a tax proposal would be behind this ludicrous stadium idea sooner or later.

Special Sections